Bioenergetics Explained! (Glycolysis, Krebs Cycle, Oxidative Phosphorylation)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 12 янв 2020
  • Easy to follow Explanation of Bioenergetics in 10 minutes! (Glycolysis, Krebs cycle, Oxidative Phosphorylation)
    Glycolysis: The process of splitting a glucose molecule in half!
    Exercise Science majors, personal trainers, and strength coaches join the Facebook group below to learn more about Strength and Conditioning!
    👇🏽Click here to Join a Facebook Strength and Conditioning Study Group!
    / 2415992685342170
    Learn more: www.themovementsystem.com
    00:16 Digestion and Glucose
    00:56 Aerobic Glycolysis Big Picture
    01:56 Rate Limiting Enzyme Phosphofructokinase (PFK)
    02:23 Aerobic Glycolysis and ATP Production
    02:46 Krebs Cycle (pyruvate, acetyl CoA, oxaloacetate, citric acid)
    04:45 Products of The Krebs Cycle
    05:04 Oxidative Phosphorylation and Resulting ATP from One Glucose Molecule
    06:25 How Fat Plays a Role in The Krebs Cycle
    07:05 Gluconeogenesis
    ✅ Let’s Connect:
    📱 Instagram: @themovementsystem

Комментарии • 124

  • @TheMovementSystem
    @TheMovementSystem  Год назад +5

    If you're studying for the CSCS Exam, make sure to join my study group: facebook.com/groups/2415992685342170

  • @lindaw4534
    @lindaw4534 3 года назад +39

    This is by far the most efficient and simple explanation I've seen on bioenergetics related to the NASM program. Thank you so much, I'm currently cramming for my exam in one month!

    • @mathematics5573
      @mathematics5573 2 года назад +1

      Robot Kittyyy! Except his Krebs cycle diagram, is wrong! He is too over simplifiying it and it is wrong.

  • @richa9154
    @richa9154 Год назад +1

    THIS IS LITERALLY SO HELPFUL, its the best way of explaining everything in detail but also in a short way

  • @tishazabin3974
    @tishazabin3974 2 года назад +2

    The way you explained the whole process is just amazing. I was struggling so much. Thank you! 💕

  • @von-marieoliva4827
    @von-marieoliva4827 3 года назад +4

    This completely simplified the topic for me! Thank you for sharing!

  • @edwardofrias8220
    @edwardofrias8220 2 года назад +5

    WOW! I feel like a boss right now. This material can be overwhelming, yet this breakdown has allowed me to see the light. You have shown me the way like David Goggins has. I wish you exponential success!! I appreciate you!!

    • @TheMovementSystem
      @TheMovementSystem  2 года назад +2

      Wow I’m going to call myself the David Goggins of bioenergetics now

  • @omeirbabi
    @omeirbabi 4 года назад +24

    I am gonna take CSCS exam next month, i must tell you i was having a hard time getting clarity about glycolysis but your explanation nailed it ! Thank you for sharing it. God bless you bro 👍

    • @TheMovementSystem
      @TheMovementSystem  4 года назад +1

      Glad it helped! Make sure you join the Facebook group: facebook.com/groups/2415992685342170/

    • @omeirbabi
      @omeirbabi 4 года назад

      I already did that moment !

  • @arielmejia4743
    @arielmejia4743 3 года назад +1

    Thank you so much for the great explanation/breakdown! ✨

  • @houmous942
    @houmous942 3 года назад +27

    Nice video overall, but there’s a mistake. When pyruvate is decarboxylated into acetylCoA, there is no O2 coming in to bind to C and form CO2. The CO2, i.e. COO, is simply the carboxylic function (COOH) that came from the pyruvate. However you didn’t mention the CoA that comes in at that step to form acetylCoA. O2 only comes into play at the end of the electron transport chain.

    • @Maani430
      @Maani430 2 месяца назад

      Thank you

  • @rene7391
    @rene7391 Год назад

    Wonderful simplified explanation 👏 thanks

  • @elliewilliams9015
    @elliewilliams9015 3 года назад +5

    This was explained so well and was much easier to understand than my lecturer's powerpoint. Thank you so much!!

  • @melissadrake4339
    @melissadrake4339 3 года назад +12

    I'm going through nasm for my cpt. I just now started learning this stuff and was soooo confused! This helps me out so much! Thank you!

  • @sarahtakash1
    @sarahtakash1 3 года назад +2

    Thank you for this! You're really helping me with my NSCA studying!

  • @jefflamb2301
    @jefflamb2301 3 года назад +17

    Man, Im doing my PT cert right now and wow.. thank you so much for being able to lay all this out. The text I have is really hard to digest compared to your explanation. Really man, thanks.

    • @Serenityi413
      @Serenityi413 2 года назад

      I'm doing mine right now, this was good.

  • @kcrehkopf
    @kcrehkopf 3 месяца назад

    om gosh you are so helpful--great concise explanation--plus super easy on the eyes

  • @tevii_mahnmegao6145
    @tevii_mahnmegao6145 Год назад

    THAT REALLY HELPED ME. WOW, GREAT JOB.

  • @thephysioscarerapist
    @thephysioscarerapist 8 месяцев назад

    Thanks for this... I understand this completely now

  • @21Bommi1
    @21Bommi1 3 года назад +1

    Very much useful. Explanation and providing attention by deeply pronouncing few terms was really good 👍 Thank you

  • @harsimarsingh3514
    @harsimarsingh3514 Год назад

    Helping me as always. Thanks alot

  • @kyarrajackson5207
    @kyarrajackson5207 Год назад

    This was the best explanation!

  • @doraorban3598
    @doraorban3598 7 месяцев назад

    You're a very good teacher!

  • @namulindwavictoria7213
    @namulindwavictoria7213 2 года назад

    Wow, thanks so much. Well explained

  • @Serenityi413
    @Serenityi413 2 года назад +1

    Thank you so much! Simply put!

  • @jeremyarguellesbullfrogend624
    @jeremyarguellesbullfrogend624 3 года назад +1

    THANKS MAN! I really like this. Very helpful

  • @lissetealopezmunguia250
    @lissetealopezmunguia250 2 года назад +1

    Very well explained! Thanks!

  • @mjwinterbottom9131
    @mjwinterbottom9131 2 года назад +1

    You made this super easy! Thank you so much! :D

  • @frajill4397
    @frajill4397 3 года назад +2

    I MISS THE NORMAL DAYS. I DON'T LIKE DOING DISCUSSIONS ONLINE, BUT WATCHING YOUR VIDEOS MOTIVATES ME.

  • @1ukasvn
    @1ukasvn 3 года назад +1

    thanks so much for the clear explanation, you just got a new subscriber! your videos are cool !

  • @Coach_ahmedflefl
    @Coach_ahmedflefl 3 года назад +1

    Easy demonstration. Thank you

  • @KitchenwithAdeela321
    @KitchenwithAdeela321 Год назад

    Thanks for sharing

  • @paiger9559
    @paiger9559 4 года назад +1

    So helpful! Thanks!

  • @GarrisonBush
    @GarrisonBush 4 года назад +1

    Hey Matt!! I’m currently studying for Nasm-cpt certification and this video helped me out a lot thank you!

  • @mcvheartsjdb
    @mcvheartsjdb 3 года назад +1

    Thank you! This was awesome.

  • @mikelowrey1172
    @mikelowrey1172 3 года назад +1

    a better teacher than my professor!

  • @nawannabaz3092
    @nawannabaz3092 3 года назад +1

    That was fantastic man 👌

  • @gavhlev2853
    @gavhlev2853 2 года назад +1

    Awesome!

  • @pjcarfagno6412
    @pjcarfagno6412 3 года назад

    very helpful and easy to follow

  • @eldiego5101
    @eldiego5101 11 месяцев назад

    Good topic exlanation

  • @ayushibandyopadhyay1766
    @ayushibandyopadhyay1766 3 года назад +2

    Have my University entrance exam in two days... No one has taught Kreb's cycle this smoothly ever to me.. This video was really useful.. Thank you 🙏

  • @abubzk
    @abubzk 2 года назад +1

    thanks

  • @TheYogiworld
    @TheYogiworld 3 года назад +1

    Very nice...👌

  • @ashiqamhmd2107
    @ashiqamhmd2107 4 месяца назад

    the best explanation vedio i have ever seen...thankyou so much sirr🫠🫠🫠❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥

  • @harshdinodiya8509
    @harshdinodiya8509 4 года назад +1

    Very nice its so easy now .. thanks

  • @johntruong4227
    @johntruong4227 2 года назад

    THANK YOU!!!!

  • @aquakatrin1332
    @aquakatrin1332 4 года назад +1

    Thank you ❤️

  • @alyssayoung.2494
    @alyssayoung.2494 3 года назад +1

    1st year med student here, this video is GREAT!!!!!!!!!!

  • @heavenlybreeze
    @heavenlybreeze 2 года назад

    Bro! You're goood!

  • @nataliea149
    @nataliea149 4 года назад +1

    Hey Matt! Are you a wizard? Just watched your vids lately and I was thinking to myself "maybe you should ask him to make a bioenergetics vid". lol thank you so much! :)

  • @kitsono8745
    @kitsono8745 2 года назад

    Isn't the first part of the Krebs cycle known as the Links reaction ? Thank you for your explanation!!! it was super helpful

  • @tedmed7349
    @tedmed7349 Месяц назад

    Can't see the forest for the trees are blocking my sight. So what is good or bad and what should we do about it.

  • @johndemwell6022
    @johndemwell6022 3 года назад

    How many ATP does aerobic and anaerobic respiration produce?

  • @truth6565
    @truth6565 4 года назад

    Hey man, just want you to know
    THIS WAS A GOOD VIDEO
    Probably can always get better but this was very good and I’m here totally randomly and a huge critic lol
    In case it helps to know; I Randomly found this searching up “bio energy” which is some jokey new age health nut shit I watched “Philion” make fun of

  • @strokesfield
    @strokesfield 2 года назад

    I'm confused. My textbook says that a net yield of 32 ATP is given "from energy transfer during the complete oxidation of one glucose molecule in glycolysis, the citric acid cycle, and electron transport."
    What am I missing here?

  • @lovethememory
    @lovethememory 2 года назад +1

    👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻

  • @lenajajo2168
    @lenajajo2168 3 года назад +2

    can you please explain why you are multipling the 10 nadh by three ? and 2 fadhd by 2 ?

    • @TheMovementSystem
      @TheMovementSystem  3 года назад +2

      When those substrates are oxidized in oxidative phosphorylation that’s how many ATP they produce

  • @-KARMA482
    @-KARMA482 Год назад

    i dont see where the 4 NADHs are in the end of the krebs cycle

  • @leytonpyett3572
    @leytonpyett3572 3 года назад

    So you get 2 NADH from aerobic glycolsis. 2 NADH x 3 = 6 ATP. If it costs 2 then shouldn't the NET be 4?

  • @guchi8884
    @guchi8884 3 года назад +1

    Is the electron chain transport a part of this?

  • @saahilshaik9024
    @saahilshaik9024 2 года назад +1

    im a little bit confused. you said that glycolysis doesn't need oxygen. but you wrote above the diagram "aerobic glycolysis" and said that if you didn't have oxygen, you would get lactate.

    • @TheMovementSystem
      @TheMovementSystem  2 года назад

      Yes. The process of glycolysis is occurring in the cytoplasm without oxygen. It's what happens after glycolysis that determines if it's aerobic or anaerobic. So if after glycolysis is done there is room in the mitochondria for the pyruvate to be metabolized the process is considered aerobic glycolysis and the pyruvate moves onto the Krebs cycle. If there is not oxygen in the mitochondria then the pyruvate will turn into lactate. That is termed anaerobic glycolysis. The terminology is confusing because in both cases the process of glycolysis didn't require oxygen.

  • @harrisonsmith8616
    @harrisonsmith8616 Год назад

    Very useful video, but everywhere I look it shows that only 32 ATP comes from 1 glucose.

  • @questionme9327
    @questionme9327 2 года назад

    form 4:30 onwards i just became completely lost. I dont understand the NADH bit and how it correlates to the krebs cycle. And the atp part, 2 extras form glycolysis amd the timsing by 3 to make 30 atp doesnt make sense to me either. Can someone recommems a video to help break this part down. tyy :)

    • @questionme9327
      @questionme9327 2 года назад +1

      just watched ur other video breaking it down and i understand it a bit better now thankyou :D

  • @Goldo1968
    @Goldo1968 2 года назад +1

    Same for lypolisis pls?

    • @TheMovementSystem
      @TheMovementSystem  2 года назад

      Here’s my video lipolysis vs. beta oxidation: m.ruclips.net/video/0EUslLbIkXo/видео.html&feature=emb_logo

  • @varunjirali9272
    @varunjirali9272 3 года назад +1

    Can u explain me about what happens if there are more pfk..?

  • @xSOMETIMEZxUNITEDx
    @xSOMETIMEZxUNITEDx 2 года назад

    Anyone want to check my work?
    For a 16 chain fatty acid you will make 129ATP.
    Is that correct?

  • @madisonhagen7133
    @madisonhagen7133 3 года назад +1

    did you mean to say anaerobic glycolysis instead of aerobic glycolysis (because you said the aerobic glycolysis doesn't need O2 but the definition of aerobic says it requires O2 and anaerobic doesn't require O2???

    • @TheMovementSystem
      @TheMovementSystem  3 года назад +1

      Neither require oxygen actually. These are both done in the cytoplasm without oxygen. Aerobic glycolysis just indicates that once split, the pyruvate will continue on to the mitochondria and use oxygen to break down more in the Krebs cycle. Anaerobic indicates that the pyruvate will turn into lactate.

    • @madisonhagen7133
      @madisonhagen7133 3 года назад +1

      @@TheMovementSystem Thank you so much for the explanation. That makes so much more sense now!

    • @TheMovementSystem
      @TheMovementSystem  3 года назад

      @@madisonhagen7133 You're welcome!

  • @mathematics5573
    @mathematics5573 2 года назад

    if I was marking an exam on the Krebs cycle, he had done, if he had written this, I would fail him.

  • @quon535
    @quon535 3 года назад

    how is 4x2 equaling 10?? Am i misinterpreting a step or something?

    • @TheMovementSystem
      @TheMovementSystem  3 года назад

      What part of the video are you referring to?

    • @quon535
      @quon535 3 года назад

      The Movement System the end where you multiple 4 by 2 for ATP

    • @TheMovementSystem
      @TheMovementSystem  3 года назад

      @@quon535 I'm still not sure what you mean. It's 34 from Oxidative phosphorylation + 2 from Glycolysis + 2 from Krebs cycle = 38

    • @quon535
      @quon535 3 года назад

      The Movement System ok you have
      4NADH x 2 = 10....

    • @quon535
      @quon535 3 года назад

      The Movement System ahhhhh never mind.... u explained it at 5:28 mark :))

  • @davidlandy4514
    @davidlandy4514 2 года назад +1

    isnt there 2.5 ATP per NADH not 3?

  • @slimboicardy
    @slimboicardy Год назад

    ang hirap

  • @caesarerelmacahilig2611
    @caesarerelmacahilig2611 3 года назад +1

    Elliott Hulse brought me here

  • @mathematics5573
    @mathematics5573 2 года назад +1

    Except his Krebs cycle diagram, is wrong! He is too over simplifiying it and it is wrong.

    • @Akash-ep8yx
      @Akash-ep8yx 4 месяца назад

      He is explaining bioenergetics , not creb cycle

  • @slimboicardy
    @slimboicardy Год назад

    pinagsasabi neto