Nikon, but recently switched to Panasonic. Still asking myself if I go ahead and make another jump to the Fuji X system when the X-T5 comes out. Going outside and actually taking pictures temporarily mutes these voices though!
I played around with my brothers Sony a6000 and last year decided to buy a used XT3. The way the Fuji system operates makes the camera feel like it’s not even there whereas the Sony felt more like a computer. The build quality and lenses are noticeably better as well.
I use fuji and shoot for magazines. I occassionally get asked when I'm going to upgrade to full frame. The reality is that screen displays have changed, but the majority of viewers have laptop sized screens. Printing hasn't changed very much at all. If the sensor can capture over 300 dpi, then realistically a 16 megapixel sensor will completely fill a a typical magazine size page at normal viewing distance with high detail. It really is that simple with technology today. Even in my published work, an apsc sensor is overkill. There is little point today in using full frame or larger sensors unless you are printing big, or you know the viewing distance is close. I have a 27:9 monitor where I can proof my images in the actual size of double page spread at 100% crop, and the fuji apsc 26 megapixel sensor is still tack sharp at under arms length. I get what you you're saying, every time I hear full frame is the professional standard, Ill accept that for certain printing applications and high end retouchers ...but the practical outcome is that they are holding on to technology spec sheet that had some truth 10 years ago, but just isn't relevant today. Its the final printed image that matters and the output you want for it. When I see people with full frame and high resolve lens without a single print anywhere in their house..you've bought into the hype and over invested.
and what about dynamic range? Fullframe are better, snd Medium-format offers much bigger possibilyties than APS-C. I saw on RUclips photography with Hasselblad 100 or 150 Mgpx - and they don't even use ND-filers! Superb quality from Medium format! And crop possibilyties ;-)
@@Fessoid Exposure bracketing and/or Variable neutral density filters. Even apsc sensors have 10 stops of dynamic range. If you wish to buy a medium format camera at 100+ megapixels for the going price of 12-70K vs a $150 filter, then by all means go for it. The problem of dynamic range has been solved decades before the first digital camera has ever been purchased. If you can accurately tell me from two pictures which one was shot on 14 stop dynamic range sensor vs which one was shot on gradient ND filter, I'll give you my life savings and first born child. As for cropping, one of my fujis has 26 megapixels, my former nikon had 24. The fuji's pixel density is greater than the nikon. It is why the canon aspc was the most popular wildlife camera in its day. Add the 1.5 crop factor and your 600mm lens now has the same crop as a 900mm and the pixel density allowed for even greater cropping. I didn't deny the value of full frame or medium format, my point is that even when specs are compared, in today's technology there is very few reasons why a very specific sensor size is needed in relation to printing. A 100+ megapixel camera may sound awesome, however it needs a lens that can resolve detail at that level. Its why If I place a fuji lens on a GFX 100 and then on a GFX 50s..I can crop the GFX 50s far more, because the the lens can resolve above 50 megapixel, but can only barely resolve at 100. In the final printing at 300dpi, the 100 megapixel is now just having 95% of those 100 million pixels pixel binned. Unless you are lab printing and using microscopes, it is overkill. Like I said, printing and screens have maximum pixel counts. Anything above that can't be printed or displayed. You may think your seeing 100 megapixels, but you arent. You are most likely only 30-40% of that. displaying detail is limited by technology, and then the human ability to see in 2D (All images are 2D) I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but there is no reason to get 100 megapixels over 50 as far as display is concerned, unless you have a very specific end use which requires very large sizes and extremely close viewing distance and displayed at an extraordinary expensive output. (such as 10 ultra large 8K monitors in an array. Last I look, one large 8k monitor costs 11k USD) Simply put..its overkill and impractical.
I switched to Nikon a few years ago. I am really happy I did. Great ecosystem, no shortage of lenses. And their roadmap, tools, and mirrorless cameras is getting better every day. But the number one thing is the Nikon Color rendering. Fabulous.
Well said! I just got my Z7II a week ago and I still cannot grasp how amazing the colors are. So far I got 24-70 and 50mm. Looking forward to try more lenses!
Fuji, currently X-T4. When I retired a few years ago I wanted to upgrade my camera gear and spent a lot of time deciding before picking Fuji, starting with X-T2. Three main reasons. I really like the dials intuitive control - reminded me of my first 35mm camera I used 50 years ago. Second was the size. Not too heavy but solid. Third was cost - especially for lenses. More bang for the buck. I am very happy with Fuji and I love their 10-24 lens.
Totally agree with you on the ‘Fun Factor’ of using Fujifilm cameras. I use to shoot with Canon and I loved my Canon gear, but Fuji bring a whole new level to having fun shooting. Their cameras just feel right, are easy to use, and get fantastic results right out of the camera. I have almost all the Fuji lenses, and they are fantastic glass. Favorites are the 10-24, the 24 f2 and the 55-200. Also love their 80 mm macro. Also really appreciate the firmware updates which Fuji makes available. I absolutely love the Fuji experience, and the Fuji community is so supportive and fun.
i share your opinion 100%. i have been shooting for 40 years and have been through all kinds of cameras, grew up analog, Canon, Nikon, Sony, all excellent cameras. But the most fun I have had in the field have been and still are Fuji cameras. Fuji is an extremely interesting company, many don't realize the unique history behind this brand. Today I still have three cameras, a Fuji GFX 50s, an XT3 and a LeicaQ, when I'm out and about in the city with a light pack. In combination with CaptureOne an excellent setup.
As a true amateur, with a day job as a comms manager in healthcare, I use Fuji just because setting the camera to Bracketing for its film simulations was so handy. In my job there's very little good lighting and a lot of white walls, different skin tones etc during spontaneous snaps of people. I also often have to very quickly get JPGs out of the camera and onto social media. So having a choice of three different film simulations was a quick-and-dirty alternative to editing pictures. Usually, one of the three simulations would do the job (Eterna was good for digging into shadows etc).
Your work has always been stunning! At the last photography class I taught you were the example I gave to my students about how it doesn't matter what brand you pick these days because all of the major manufacturers, and even some of the fringe manufacturers are making amazing cameras. A prime example of why gear doesn't matter, but it also does matter.
I switched to Fuji with a used Xt1 before fully committing myself. Then an Xpro1, and Xt3. As a user of many systems, I have found my home. For me, it just works.
I am using a nikon dslr's, a D5300 and D7100 and those cameras are excellent for me. Before them I was using a point and shot fuji s2970. My plans for the future is mirrorless fuji xs-10 with 16-80 and 70-300 lenses, because I am hiker also and this camera is for now on the top of wishlist.
Having made the switch to Fuji myself (GFX 100S w/32-64, 50, and 100-200), I moved to CaptureOne as well. I thought I had made a huge mistake, because the interface was totally foreign to me after using Photoshop for years. Now a few months down the road, I'm in love with both my Fuji and CaptureOne. I don't print from C1, because I prefer the Canon printer software that came with my Canon Pro 1000, but aside from that, C1 has totally won me over.
Using the Sony A7R III and super happy with the camera and the Sony ecosystem. Tons of excellent lenses to choose from, not only native but also from brands like Sigma and Tamron. I've configured my camera so that I easily can change ISO, aperture, and shutter speed with dedicated dials. Also using custom buttons to avoid that (unintuitive) menu system, and memory recalls to quickly switch from landscape settings to action or portraits. The menu system is bad, but I never need to go in there when I'm out in the field because of the customizations I've done. Anyway, as long as you know your camera it doesn't really matter what brand you're using. They can all produce some pretty amazing results.
I have the same camera, I love it and I absolutely agree with you. Once all the necessary customisations and quick access settings are set up, there’s no need to quibble through the menu system. I don’t get why people complain about the menu system so much when you don’t need to use it once it’s tailored and setup to all your use cases!
I shot with the Sony a6000 for about 5 years then switched to xt3. Something about fuji that kept getting me more curious. I'm happy that I did. I feel it fits me.
A comprehensive and honest review Mark, I love your candid reason for choosing the FUJI GFX. I also think like that, 6 years ago I upgraded from a Canon 5DMk2 to the 5DsR, I don't regret the change but it took a beating in the reviews for outside of Landscape or studio use. That's fine, I only shoot Landscapes with it. LOL! I could be tempted to go to the GFX100s ...but the $$$$! WOW!
Using my xt3 for 2 years now, coming from an a7ii. Couldn't be happier with my choice. Fast, reliable, top image quality and plenty of features, packaged in a beautiful way that makes photography fun again. Gonna stick with it probably as much as the shutter works cause it has everything i really need.
Couldn't agree more. I took a photography class a couple of years ago. We all showed the camera we were using at the beginning of the class. Me and another lady had Fujifilm gear. Instructor said "there's always one in every class" LOL I've been using a XT-30 for a couple of years and just bought an XT-20 body that's being modified for astrophotography. Love the small size and weight of these bodies.
What's fuji like for printing? I'm currently moving from EOSR to XH2 and worried I'm making a big mistake when it comes to print. How big do you think the new XH2 40mp sensor can print? Thanks!
Truthfully I almost gave up, on Fujifilm xt3 but those lenses are very well made I come from film and inspire me a lot with your beautiful images I am looking forward to get the 100 S. Thanks for sharing
I bought my X-T3 back in 2020, but it mostly sat around collecting dust. I started actually using it at the beginning of this summer (2022), and it has been a remarkably easy camera to learn on. The exposed aperture, shutter speed and ISO dials, along with the instant feedback of mirrorless cameras, made it extremely easy to pick up how the 'exposure triangle' works. While now I rarely use the top dials and instead use the front and back dials, I don't think it would have been nearly as easy to learn with a PASM dial.
got my new 10-24 version earlier this week, and selling the ole one! I use it almost every day on real estate shoots, and this lens really does come in handy so many other times! I also switched from Sony to Fuji XT4, which is my first Fuji camera, and I got about 5 or 6 of their lenses! can't wait to see what happens this May during the summit and what exactly is coming out on XH-2's and GFX line, etc.!!
Mark, thank you. I am also a Fuji user. (XT-2 & XT-4). Selfishly, it was great to hear you express your reasons for switching to Fuji and knowing that my reasons echo yrs! Also, having had surgeries, (CTS) on both wrists, the weight factor (less) is real. Part of that pleasure is simply the "tactical" feel of the dials, body, etc. Last, there are a few pro's out there like yourself who do photography training, mentoring, education while using Fuji equipment. Winner all around!!
Hey Mark, nice video. Yes, I am a Fuji fan and you delineated the reasons very well!! Plus, after 2 carpel tunnel surgeries the other reason is weight! Compared to my Nikon bodies and lens - no difference. Started w/ to XT-2 and have progressed to the 4 and now 5. Your videos on the GFX made me drool, but just could not do it. I have used ON1 Photo Raw now over 3 yrs and to darn old to learn another software! :) Look fwd to more videos including Fuji reference. Tks again. Also Great T-Shirt.
Great information on this video as usual. I am planning on switching from Canon to Fuji, I noticed in this video, a year old by now, you consider Capture One the best option to process Fuji files instead of Lightroom, however, it feels, by watching your more recent videos and training material, that you are using more LrC than Capture One, so quick (maybe) question, have LrC improve to the point you don't need to use Capture One or are you having a prior step, such as using DxO, before post-processing in LrC. I appreciate your comments and keep the good work. Thanks. Manuel D.
Still a Sony full frame shooter but going to dabble with OM Systems. The om-1 is doing some truly mind blowing things with computational photography. It might finally partially free me from my tripod.
Agree 100%, Mark. I have an XT3 / GFX 50S mk1 combo, though the 50S gets far more use nowadays. Thanks for making me think again about Capture One. Though, like you, I prefer LR's interface, and the thought of losing the muscle memory after 10 years of LR and learning something new with the resulting initial slow edit speed, makes me always take a step back from the brink ;-).
If it's about how LR renders the RAW files from Fuji, give Iridient x-transformer a try. I use it to convert my RAF files to DNGs and then use Lightroom for its strength. Not sure if it works with the 50S files, but XT3 works for sure. I use it with my XT1 because the "photographer" plan with LR + PS can't be beaten by C1 in my opinion.
Hey Mark, you mention using capture one for editing yet when you show an editing video you use lightroom? Are you going to start showing capture one from now on? That would be good to see.
I totally understand why you switched, Mark. I still miss my x100 for it’s tactility and design. And the glass/sensor combo was amazing. I have 2-metre prints on my walls from that camera. I suspect my next system (I’m on R5/R6 now) will be something like yours. Take care, Mark. Oh, and I just love your studio/office. Great to see it all for the first time. 👍🦘🇦🇺😄
Great video as usual MArk ! I’m also new to Fuji and Capture one. It would be nice to hear you taking about Capture On and how you edit your photos on it ! Thanks again !
Mark, thanks for this. Basically agree on all counts with your assessment of Fuji and their cameras and lenses. Fun to use. Easy to use. wonderful images. As an XH-1 owner, I have to take issue with your comment about firmware updates. We (XH-1 users) have been left out in the cold for years. Frustrating to say the least. Keep up the great work.
I'm super intrigued now by the difference between capture one and lightroom. I wonder if you could make a video sometime showing the differences between the two that pulled you toward capture one?
Very interesting (coincidence?) that just a few days ago Andy Mumford also talked about why he switched to Fujifilm and kept it with a lot of enjoyment. He will still keep shooting with X-T4 as his main camera although he also has a GFX.
@@mattsiler7418 Thanks for the recommendation! Actually I began to know Mumford when he and Livieri made an episode comparing Fuji 50-140 and 55-200 lenses. I like both of them since their photo styles are similar. I have paid more attention to Mumford maybe because his accent is more to my preference. :-)
I directly started with the Fuji-System when I got more serious about photography 6 years ago. So it all started with the X-E1 then X-T2, X-T4. I really enjoy using the system, just like you mentioned. I also switched from LR to Capture One. A couple of months ago, I bought a used GFX50R with the GF32-64 and the pictures you get from the GFX system is absolutely stunning. By now I also got the 100-200 and lately the 120 Macro. I'll get out tomorrow morning with the GFX and see what I will find. 🙂
I love my Fuji XT30, switched from Nikon a couple of years ago, will be up grading soon to an XT4 or the new XH2 when it comes and will use the XT30 for the videos,also smashed my 55-200 so I will replace it with the 70--300 when I can get my hands on one. Thanks for sharing mark.
Enjoyed your video. My main cameras are a Panasonic G9 and a Fuji X-T4. I love both but the Fuji definitely has the edge in image quality. I love the tactile dials, retro looks and well built quality of the Fuji. Fuji takes a lot of guff for its subpar video autofocus capabilities and wish they addressed that in some firmware updates. I use Capture One for my Fuji and Lightroom for all else. Lightroom's latest update is killer but Capture One is in some ways still better. I wish I had the funds to get one of Fuji's medium format offerings but glad to hear you are enjoying it.
Great video Mark. This one really hits home for me. I switched from Nikon to Fuji when the X-T1 was released. At the time, Nikon was not innovating their cameras and I was looking for something new. Now I have the X-T2 and X-T4 with an assortment of lenses. I truly enjoy the system. My 10-24 is also pretty beat up. I have not made the leap to get the new version yet. The one area I am struggling is Capture 1 vs. LR. Last year I purchased C1 and used it for a while …then LR updated with their new masking features and I switched back and use enhance details to get better images from LR. Another reason: I was not finding I could get some of the more creative results I wanted in my images that I could get in LR. Your video has me second guessing that decision and thinking I should reconsider C1. Thanks for the video.
Hey Mark, love your consistency with video uploads. Been following you since just before you made the fujifilm switch from sony. Totally agree with the point you made about using something different. I think for adventure or landscape photography Fuji is really a sleeper brand. Their cameras are super solid for rugged conditions and the lightweight APSC system paired with the high end image quality is perfect for those outdoorsy type.
I also love my Fuji (X-H1) and I switch from Canon 😉 I’ve been getting a lot of tips and tricks around Fuji from you 👍🏼 and I really hope you’re still showing edits in LR 🙏🏼
Just saw you video and the process on buying a fuji camera been looking and watch reviews on the XT-4 and wanted to ask is the grib to jold the camera is it uncomfortable caiseof the form factor cause it's too close to the lens is there a battery grip you can attach to you. I know they a build like a tank and I love that but if you can answer those question for me thatbwould be great. Like you video too
Mark I agree with you. The Fuji cameras are just more fun to shoot with for me. I love the tactile feel of the dials. I have owned the X-T1 thru X-T4 along with the GFX 100S. I have not used Capture One. I still work with LR and PS on my files. What is the big advantage of Capture One in your opinion for the Fuji files?
Thanks Mark. I was really interested in your call out for Capture One. Would enjoy, if you ever want, to see your workflow. Fuji user, but still in LR for raw processing, organization, and printing. Have contemplated / tried the switch to C1 a few times, and I haven’t been able to close the full lifecycle loop,
I have been using the Fuji now for the last 10 years and currently own the XT4 and the x100s and absolutely love the look out of these cameras. Last month I got my first Sony camera the new A7IV and was so excited about adding Sony to my workflow until I went landscape shooting yesterday. After comparing the images from both cameras shot at the same settings, and similar focal lengths I was so shocked at how much better the Fuji images looked. The colors popped on the Fuji and Sonys colors looked muted and off colored. My Sony is a beast for video and portrait photography but a little disappointing for landscapes. I was hoping Sony would compete and I would have two stellar systems. Don’t get me wrong the Sony is a great camera but after comparing them I’ll leave the Sony at home if I’m shooting sea and landscapes. Thank you Mark for sharing your experience I agree hands down the Fuji is easier to use and more fun to shoot.
@@Elazarko I’m still comparing these two cameras I can get awesome close ups out of both. I’ve had people say, “oh I love this picture better” and it was my Fuji and the next person says, “oh I love that one better” and it turns out to be the Sony. Honestly they’re both so good, I go back and forth at times. Does one make me better? No! But the Sony is better for video for many reasons, for me the main one being no more 29 min time limit and better eye detection.
@@rich88789 yea, I understand. in general people don't notice and don't care about so many of the things photographers care about.. I think what I'm going to do is buy a A7IV and a smaller Fujifilm in the future as a small walk around/Travel setup. I wish the Fujifilm GFX 50sii had all the features of the Sony A7IV.. that would be insane!!
I have had a Canon A1 for years. It has sat on the shelf for several years as I took pictures of our children with cheap digital cameras or a phone camera. I have taken a lot of pictures while hiking, backpacking or on vacation. I have received good compliments on many of my pictures. It seems to me the vision of the photographer capturing the image plays a greater part on the outcome than the device being used. Can anyone tell if a five-dollar brush or a ten-dollar brush was used to paint a beautiful piece of art? Just grab the brush that is comfortable and paint away. Two years ago I purchased a Canon EOS R and love it and I try to use it as often as possible.
Hi Mark - thanks for that. I'd be really interested to see maybe a short series of videos from you on an intro to capture 1. I'm also a Fuji user and like you, seriously hesitated to go to Capture 1.
Bought my first camera in 2019 a FUJIFILM XT-3 I shoot mostly landscapes and occasionally street photography. All good so far but I still struggle sometimes with that worm effect on my files...
I am a bit late to answer your question dated some 5 months ago. Anyway, i am using Xpro2 and i want to know does it make much difference between xPro2 and XT-4 since both are ASP-C camera, the reason i am asking, is that i want to get another camera ( preferably FUJI, so that i can share those x-mount lens i already have ).
I think a really good future video would be a comparison between capture one and Lightroom. My current user experience with the adobe ecosystem has been awful. The only current reason im exclusively using adobe is for the iPad compatibility. Until I recently bought a laptop, I was using my iPad Pro exclusively for editing and capture one still does not have an iPad app. As far as adobe goes, the syncing issues are horrible. I like to cull through a shoot on the iPad sitting with a warm beverage in front of the tv. Currently if I delete images on the iPad it does not delete them from LRC because the iPad is only cloud based. For a new user the Adobe ecosystem is not even remotely user friendly. I believe capture one is working on an iPad solution, I am looking forward to giving it a shot.
Hello Mark, I love the Fuji system as well. I used Fujifilm exclusively in my film cameras. I love the colors. I have the SX10 which I love playing with. What lens would you recommend for birds in flight photography? I want to go to the Conowingo Dam in MD and photo eagles. I see a mix of lens reach to get decent photos of the eagles. I do want to get the 10-24 mm that you use too. I eventually want to get a T3 or T4. The GFX is also a possibility.
Thanks Mark! The question I have is about sensor dust. Have you had to clean you sensor more, less, or about the same as your previous mirror-less cameras? Going back to you DSLR days, is the FujiFilm system sensors being cleaned more, less or the same as your DSLRs?
I really enjoy your videos. I wonder as a maker if you would concider a basic how to make a video. I say this as I recently bought the Fuji XH2 but know nothing about making a video as yet. Theres plenty of videos about the settings but nothing that Ive found so far that helps me. my other camera is aan XPro3.
Thanks good video ! I also have 2 systems and one is the GFX 100S. For landscape not usingv ery often long tele but sometimes it's useful. For the moment my longer tele is the 45 100. Considering the capability of the sensor, not sure yet if it can replace for example a 55-200 with a XT3. So more options for tele for GFX would be nice. And finally after few months experience with the GFX for landscape , the biggest limitation for me is to get everything in focus , foreground to background, even withe 23 mm.
I have the GFX 100 and Love it, sold all my Nikon .......... I just need a 600mm lens for it and all would be Perfect, I have the 250mm and the 1/4 tele and the 100-200, 45-100, 32-64, 23mm
Other then image quality, how do you like the GFX compared to the X-T3 and 4? I've heard that its kinda slow and not really an "all around camera" like the X-T4. Like it cant be used for sport very easily for instance. I guess you dont need it to be snappy for your style of photography. It would be interesting to hear what you think about it compared to the X-T3 and 4, outside of image quality. :)
Before processing your photos with your current choice, did you try that one photo processor software owned by a company based in Portland OR (it has the word On in its name followed by a 1)? I have heard Fuji users express positive and better results from it compared to the software choice that you left, but is still considered the gold-standard for most other photographers.
The XT30 and xe4 lineup is the same price as the cheaper Sony APSC lineups. A6600 is really close to xt4 prices these days. Fuji definitely is more pricey once you accumulate alot of lenses though 😅
@@YetAnotherRcChannel you get what you pay for in terms of the quality of lenses. I wasn’t too impressed with the Sony apsc kit lens or the 55-210 but that’s just me. The sigma lenses are coming to Fuji soon so the 16mm 1.4 you mentioned should be making its way over for a similar price.
@@YetAnotherRcChannel tbh we photographers definitely split hairs when it comes to “quality” being happy and comfortable with your kit is all that matters! The people who view our photos definitely won’t tell the difference. 😂
yes because Sony APS-C is cheap, minimalistic and with less control dials (fe. no joystick, no front command dial, no dual card slot). Fuji APS-C ist overall more premium and therefore more expensive😊.
Landscape photography it is always about big depth of field, but medium format cameras like 100s has smaller area where subjects in front of camera appears sharp. Comparing of cause full with frame and crop sensor cameras. Is this specific of medium format can limits your possibilities in landscape photography? How do you unusually copes with situations when you need bigger depth of field than it is possible with your lens? How frequently such situations appear in your practice (comparing with XT-4)? I can assume that you have to use focus stacking more frequently with X100s comparing to XT4.
I used FujiFilm for five years and then in January 2020, I switched. Now in January 2022, I got the X-T4. Why? I missed the experience I had with the FujiFilm gear for macro.
Hi, great video and luv Fujifilm. I had the Fujifilm XT2 as well as the X-H1, sold them off and purchased the X-S10 which I absolutely love as it is so lightweight, amazing grip and IBIS. Just wondering why you purchased the GFX 100 instead of the 50R or 50S? I cannot imagine the extra burden and processing times on one’s computer system for 100 megapixel vs 50, not to mention the demand on storage.
4:30 your thoughts here really irked me for some random reason lol. I don't understand why people prefer the screen on the 100s over the XT-4? Especially in the example you showed. The XT-4 screen flips out to the exact same angle as the 100s but the hinge is on the bottom instead of the top. The screen is literally just 2 inches lower. Plus you can't protect the screen on the 100s by flipping it around during harsh weather or when carrying the camera outside of a bag. The flip and turn hinge is so much better than the other flimsy design. Apparently I feel very strongly on camera screen hinges lmao.
So, does Lightroom not perform as well as Capture One on the GFX 100s Bayer sensor files? You didn't distinguish the sensor types in the processing issue.
Hi Mark. I just watched one of your videos where you had PPA as a sponsor. In the past there have been criticisms about the insurance. That it was hard to file a claim and insert instances didn't cover the full value. Just wanted to get your opinion on the upgraded insurance. Thanks!
Just curious. When you process Fuji files in LR, do you import the files as native Fuji raw files or convert them as Adobe DNG files? I do not know, but have gathered from misc sources that the latter works better than the former for processing Fuji files in LR. Otherwise there is some loss of detail or smearing. I'd be curious to hear your experience in the matter. Thanks.
As a kid, I enjoyed Fujifilm film. I have been in and out hobbying with photography over the past 18 years. But I've found myself investing in Canon. I would love to also invest in Fujifilm as I do love their color profiles. But I don't have the $$$.
I use Nikon D850 when I consider changing systems I just can't get past the cost benefit balance. I guess I'm just cheap or rather I know I'm cheap but I just can't see how changing would make that much of a difference. I believe the old saying it's the "Indian not the arrows".
Hi Doug. If your D850 and glass does all you want, why would you change? I shoot Fuji at the moment and the system does 95% of what I want flawlessly. The kit takes better pictures than me. Where it and I fall down is in the last 5% when I can't get close enough to some wildlife and need to crop harder than the files allow to print big. Whether that is enough to justify another body remains to be seen.
What camra would you recommend for a step up from a pocket camra for a new learner that is interested in taking pictures with a little better camra that's easier to use something like the Kodak camras let me know your thoughts
I'm not gonna leave Fuji, that's for sure, but depending on what they release around May this year, I may be looking at a Nikon z7ii as a secondary camera for certain things. Wondering if we'll get a stacked sensor announced for one of the XH-2's released, or if there's an XT5. I've heard the flagship is moving over to XH line and XT line will be more for amateur or hobbyists. I already own a lot of X mount lenses so I'm quite sure I'll be getting a new X mount model unless I'm driven to get a GFX model - or a Nikon, depending on a few things!
Did you hear that the new Fujifilm CEO made a statement last May (I think) that they were shifting their focus to the medical and healthcare industry? Are you concerned that this shift will mean that they will fall behind on R&D especially with video, autofocus, menus, etc? My wife and I bought the X Pro-1 when it came out and upgraded to an X-T4 last year and have been enjoying it. We’re concerned, though, that our investing in the Fujifilm ecosystem (especially lenses) might not be a wise investment looking to the future.
When I used Nikon, it got me into photography. When I switched to the Fuji X-T4, it made me a photographer. It is hands down the best brand I’ve ever used and I don’t see myself switching. I am extremely excited to see the next X-T5. I have a feeling it’s going to be groundbreaking in the APS-C space.
Mark, thanks for this video. I also switched from Sony to Fuji (GFX100s and X100V). Just a quick question. Do you use the full pro version of Capture One or do you use the free version for Fujifilm. I'm considering diving in full with Capture One, but not sure if it is worth the price...
I really wish the Q menu on FUJI cameras would save things such as, shot timer, save data set up (RAW/ JPG), aspect ratio AND SD card slot saving style. I have to constantly change between client real estate shoots, portrait, or quick action, for example. Always gotta check the AF custom settings. Just a lot of things to change between shooting styles, and saving data styles as well. It doesn't make sense to me that these options aren't able to save on a quick menu setting. Do other camera brands allow all of the settings to be saved per custom group setting that the user programs themselves ????
This missing feature set drives me crazy as well! No reason NOT to have C1, C2, C3 to save settings for different shooting styles like Landscape, portrait, street, sports whatever...most togs shoot a bunch of different styles.
Bayer sensor raw algorithms are pretty much the same, all research I've seen is that LR vs Capture One RAW processing is a wash. I'm not spending the money or the time to change over to Capture One after researching this topic. Now, if I had the x-trans APS-C sensor, it might be worth it.
Mark, I'm also a Fuji user and enjoy the experience very much. Have you used the GFX system for Astro Landscapes? If so, how does it compare to a full frame setup? Thank you for sharing your experience and insights through your weekly videos!
Thanks, Mark, for a really good account of the Fuji system. As a Fuji user for four years, this was really timely for me. My question now is whether to upgrade to the XT4 (or5) which is heavier than the XT2 and 3, in which case I need to learn Capture One. Or do I go for the Nikon Z series, only a little heavier than the XT4, but full frame, and continue post-processing in Lightroom and Photoshop. Still undecided, but you've given me more food for thought.
I've settled on Fuji (X-E3) for my small setup, "street photography" type stuff, and have a Nikon Z for wildlife, landscape, etc... things where I'm using bigger lenses and don't mind a bigger camera. Both systems are great, and you really can't go wrong with either. I do find that Nikon has a better selection of lenses and the Z 24-200 covers 99% of my needs. Fuji has no equivalent for that one.
Which brand have you been using the past 2 years?
Sony.
Nikon, but recently switched to Panasonic. Still asking myself if I go ahead and make another jump to the Fuji X system when the X-T5 comes out. Going outside and actually taking pictures temporarily mutes these voices though!
Sony. My Camera is a Sony a7RIV and I only own two lens: Sony 16-35GM and Sony 100-400GM. Next camera? Sony for sure.
I played around with my brothers Sony a6000 and last year decided to buy a used XT3. The way the Fuji system operates makes the camera feel like it’s not even there whereas the Sony felt more like a computer. The build quality and lenses are noticeably better as well.
Fuji X-T3 and X-pro2. 😁
I use fuji and shoot for magazines. I occassionally get asked when I'm going to upgrade to full frame. The reality is that screen displays have changed, but the majority of viewers have laptop sized screens. Printing hasn't changed very much at all. If the sensor can capture over 300 dpi, then realistically a 16 megapixel sensor will completely fill a a typical magazine size page at normal viewing distance with high detail. It really is that simple with technology today. Even in my published work, an apsc sensor is overkill. There is little point today in using full frame or larger sensors unless you are printing big, or you know the viewing distance is close. I have a 27:9 monitor where I can proof my images in the actual size of double page spread at 100% crop, and the fuji apsc 26 megapixel sensor is still tack sharp at under arms length.
I get what you you're saying, every time I hear full frame is the professional standard, Ill accept that for certain printing applications and high end retouchers ...but the practical outcome is that they are holding on to technology spec sheet that had some truth 10 years ago, but just isn't relevant today. Its the final printed image that matters and the output you want for it. When I see people with full frame and high resolve lens without a single print anywhere in their house..you've bought into the hype and over invested.
david neville’s comment should be a compulsory reeding for every photographer
and what about dynamic range?
Fullframe are better, snd Medium-format offers much bigger possibilyties than APS-C.
I saw on RUclips photography with Hasselblad 100 or 150 Mgpx - and they don't even use ND-filers!
Superb quality from Medium format! And crop possibilyties ;-)
@@Fessoid Exposure bracketing and/or Variable neutral density filters. Even apsc sensors have 10 stops of dynamic range. If you wish to buy a medium format camera at 100+ megapixels for the going price of 12-70K vs a $150 filter, then by all means go for it. The problem of dynamic range has been solved decades before the first digital camera has ever been purchased.
If you can accurately tell me from two pictures which one was shot on 14 stop dynamic range sensor vs which one was shot on gradient ND filter, I'll give you my life savings and first born child.
As for cropping, one of my fujis has 26 megapixels, my former nikon had 24. The fuji's pixel density is greater than the nikon. It is why the canon aspc was the most popular wildlife camera in its day. Add the 1.5 crop factor and your 600mm lens now has the same crop as a 900mm and the pixel density allowed for even greater cropping.
I didn't deny the value of full frame or medium format, my point is that even when specs are compared, in today's technology there is very few reasons why a very specific sensor size is needed in relation to printing. A 100+ megapixel camera may sound awesome, however it needs a lens that can resolve detail at that level. Its why If I place a fuji lens on a GFX 100 and then on a GFX 50s..I can crop the GFX 50s far more, because the the lens can resolve above 50 megapixel, but can only barely resolve at 100. In the final printing at 300dpi, the 100 megapixel is now just having 95% of those 100 million pixels pixel binned. Unless you are lab printing and using microscopes, it is overkill.
Like I said, printing and screens have maximum pixel counts. Anything above that can't be printed or displayed. You may think your seeing 100 megapixels, but you arent. You are most likely only 30-40% of that. displaying detail is limited by technology, and then the human ability to see in 2D (All images are 2D)
I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but there is no reason to get 100 megapixels over 50 as far as display is concerned, unless you have a very specific end use which requires very large sizes and extremely close viewing distance and displayed at an extraordinary expensive output. (such as 10 ultra large 8K monitors in an array. Last I look, one large 8k monitor costs 11k USD) Simply put..its overkill and impractical.
@@lefthandright01 wow, man. thats the answer!
@@lefthandright01 and there is a reason why you could wish to have a higher mpx camera.
Its true for me:
m.ruclips.net/video/fzJsb56jrnc/видео.html
I switched to Nikon a few years ago. I am really happy I did. Great ecosystem, no shortage of lenses. And their roadmap, tools, and mirrorless cameras is getting better every day. But the number one thing is the Nikon Color rendering. Fabulous.
Well said! I just got my Z7II a week ago and I still cannot grasp how amazing the colors are. So far I got 24-70 and 50mm. Looking forward to try more lenses!
David, what system did you switched from?
@@memcrew1 Olympus & Sony
@@dfinlay587 ok
Fuji, currently X-T4. When I retired a few years ago I wanted to upgrade my camera gear and spent a lot of time deciding before picking Fuji, starting with X-T2. Three main reasons. I really like the dials intuitive control - reminded me of my first 35mm camera I used 50 years ago. Second was the size. Not too heavy but solid. Third was cost - especially for lenses. More bang for the buck. I am very happy with Fuji and I love their 10-24 lens.
Totally agree with you on the ‘Fun Factor’ of using Fujifilm cameras. I use to shoot with Canon and I loved my Canon gear, but Fuji bring a whole new level to having fun shooting. Their cameras just feel right, are easy to use, and get fantastic results right out of the camera. I have almost all the Fuji lenses, and they are fantastic glass. Favorites are the 10-24, the 24 f2 and the 55-200. Also love their 80 mm macro. Also really appreciate the firmware updates which Fuji makes available. I absolutely love the Fuji experience, and the Fuji community is so supportive and fun.
i share your opinion 100%. i have been shooting for 40 years and have been through all kinds of cameras, grew up analog, Canon, Nikon, Sony, all excellent cameras. But the most fun I have had in the field have been and still are Fuji cameras. Fuji is an extremely interesting company, many don't realize the unique history behind this brand. Today I still have three cameras, a Fuji GFX 50s, an XT3 and a LeicaQ, when I'm out and about in the city with a light pack. In combination with CaptureOne an excellent setup.
As a true amateur, with a day job as a comms manager in healthcare, I use Fuji just because setting the camera to Bracketing for its film simulations was so handy. In my job there's very little good lighting and a lot of white walls, different skin tones etc during spontaneous snaps of people. I also often have to very quickly get JPGs out of the camera and onto social media. So having a choice of three different film simulations was a quick-and-dirty alternative to editing pictures. Usually, one of the three simulations would do the job (Eterna was good for digging into shadows etc).
Your work has always been stunning! At the last photography class I taught you were the example I gave to my students about how it doesn't matter what brand you pick these days because all of the major manufacturers, and even some of the fringe manufacturers are making amazing cameras. A prime example of why gear doesn't matter, but it also does matter.
Great video! I LOVE my fuji xt3.. i would be interested in a deep dive into how your camera is set up to help with landscape photography!
I've been using Fuji for the last 10 years when the X-Pro 1 was launched. And I keep enjoying Fuji cameras! Now I use two X-T4.
I switched to Fuji with a used Xt1 before fully committing myself. Then an Xpro1, and Xt3. As a user of many systems, I have found my home. For me, it just works.
I am using a nikon dslr's, a D5300 and D7100 and those cameras are excellent for me. Before them I was using a point and shot fuji s2970. My plans for the future is mirrorless fuji xs-10 with 16-80 and 70-300 lenses, because I am hiker also and this camera is for now on the top of wishlist.
Thanks, Mark. Always enjoy spending some time with you !
You high lighted the key element in working with a system that doesn't get in the way to get the job done. thanks for the reminder!
Having made the switch to Fuji myself (GFX 100S w/32-64, 50, and 100-200), I moved to CaptureOne as well. I thought I had made a huge mistake, because the interface was totally foreign to me after using Photoshop for years. Now a few months down the road, I'm in love with both my Fuji and CaptureOne. I don't print from C1, because I prefer the Canon printer software that came with my Canon Pro 1000, but aside from that, C1 has totally won me over.
Using the Sony A7R III and super happy with the camera and the Sony ecosystem. Tons of excellent lenses to choose from, not only native but also from brands like Sigma and Tamron. I've configured my camera so that I easily can change ISO, aperture, and shutter speed with dedicated dials. Also using custom buttons to avoid that (unintuitive) menu system, and memory recalls to quickly switch from landscape settings to action or portraits. The menu system is bad, but I never need to go in there when I'm out in the field because of the customizations I've done. Anyway, as long as you know your camera it doesn't really matter what brand you're using. They can all produce some pretty amazing results.
I have the same camera, I love it and I absolutely agree with you. Once all the necessary customisations and quick access settings are set up, there’s no need to quibble through the menu system. I don’t get why people complain about the menu system so much when you don’t need to use it once it’s tailored and setup to all your use cases!
The Sony customisation is phenomenal. Love truly being able to make it your camera.
I shot with the Sony a6000 for about 5 years then switched to xt3. Something about fuji that kept getting me more curious. I'm happy that I did. I feel it fits me.
Another great video. Hope you are ready to shoot snowmageddon! Good luck!
I really appreciate all your content and will def use your square space ref when I sign up. Thanks for all you do. 🙏🏻
A comprehensive and honest review Mark, I love your candid reason for choosing the FUJI GFX. I also think like that, 6 years ago I upgraded from a Canon 5DMk2 to the 5DsR, I don't regret the change but it took a beating in the reviews for outside of Landscape or studio use. That's fine, I only shoot Landscapes with it. LOL! I could be tempted to go to the GFX100s ...but the $$$$! WOW!
Using my xt3 for 2 years now, coming from an a7ii. Couldn't be happier with my choice. Fast, reliable, top image quality and plenty of features, packaged in a beautiful way that makes photography fun again. Gonna stick with it probably as much as the shutter works cause it has everything i really need.
Hey, Mark. Really love your style of videos. I wanted to ask how come you didn’t get the xt5?
Couldn't agree more. I took a photography class a couple of years ago. We all showed the camera we were using at the beginning of the class. Me and another lady had Fujifilm gear. Instructor said "there's always one in every class" LOL
I've been using a XT-30 for a couple of years and just bought an XT-20 body that's being modified for astrophotography. Love the small size and weight of these bodies.
What's fuji like for printing? I'm currently moving from EOSR to XH2 and worried I'm making a big mistake when it comes to print. How big do you think the new XH2 40mp sensor can print? Thanks!
Great video. Thanks for giving us your experience with Fuji. It seems that they are a great company.
Truthfully I almost gave up, on Fujifilm xt3 but those lenses are very well made I come from film and inspire me a lot with your beautiful images I am looking forward to get the 100 S. Thanks for sharing
I bought my X-T3 back in 2020, but it mostly sat around collecting dust. I started actually using it at the beginning of this summer (2022), and it has been a remarkably easy camera to learn on. The exposed aperture, shutter speed and ISO dials, along with the instant feedback of mirrorless cameras, made it extremely easy to pick up how the 'exposure triangle' works. While now I rarely use the top dials and instead use the front and back dials, I don't think it would have been nearly as easy to learn with a PASM dial.
got my new 10-24 version earlier this week, and selling the ole one! I use it almost every day on real estate shoots, and this lens really does come in handy so many other times! I also switched from Sony to Fuji XT4, which is my first Fuji camera, and I got about 5 or 6 of their lenses! can't wait to see what happens this May during the summit and what exactly is coming out on XH-2's and GFX line, etc.!!
Mark, thank you. I am also a Fuji user. (XT-2 & XT-4). Selfishly, it was great to hear you express your reasons for switching to Fuji and knowing that my reasons echo yrs! Also, having had surgeries, (CTS) on both wrists, the weight factor (less) is real. Part of that pleasure is simply the "tactical" feel of the dials, body, etc. Last, there are a few pro's out there like yourself who do photography training, mentoring, education while using Fuji equipment. Winner all around!!
Thanks so much Merle!
Hey Mark, nice video. Yes, I am a Fuji fan and you delineated the reasons very well!! Plus, after 2 carpel tunnel surgeries the other reason is weight! Compared to my Nikon bodies and lens - no difference. Started w/ to XT-2 and have progressed to the 4 and now 5. Your videos on the GFX made me drool, but just could not do it. I have used ON1 Photo Raw now over 3 yrs and to darn old to learn another software! :) Look fwd to more videos including Fuji reference. Tks again. Also Great T-Shirt.
I love my Leica SL2 and the whole L-Mount system. Love the feel of the camera and the simplicity of using it.
Fuji XH1 and XS10. All Fuji lenses. Also have a Lumix GX85 for out and about which I like very much!!
Great information on this video as usual.
I am planning on switching from Canon to Fuji, I noticed in this video, a year old by now, you consider Capture One the best option to process Fuji files instead of Lightroom, however, it feels, by watching your more recent videos and training material, that you are using more LrC than Capture One, so quick (maybe) question, have LrC improve to the point you don't need to use Capture One or are you having a prior step, such as using DxO, before post-processing in LrC. I appreciate your comments and keep the good work.
Thanks.
Manuel D.
Still a Sony full frame shooter but going to dabble with OM Systems. The om-1 is doing some truly mind blowing things with computational photography. It might finally partially free me from my tripod.
Agree 100%, Mark. I have an XT3 / GFX 50S mk1 combo, though the 50S gets far more use nowadays. Thanks for making me think again about Capture One. Though, like you, I prefer LR's interface, and the thought of losing the muscle memory after 10 years of LR and learning something new with the resulting initial slow edit speed, makes me always take a step back from the brink ;-).
If it's about how LR renders the RAW files from Fuji, give Iridient x-transformer a try. I use it to convert my RAF files to DNGs and then use Lightroom for its strength. Not sure if it works with the 50S files, but XT3 works for sure. I use it with my XT1 because the "photographer" plan with LR + PS can't be beaten by C1 in my opinion.
Hey Mark, you mention using capture one for editing yet when you show an editing video you use lightroom? Are you going to start showing capture one from now on? That would be good to see.
Fuji and Man perfect match . Good job thank you.
Thanks David!
I totally understand why you switched, Mark. I still miss my x100 for it’s tactility and design. And the glass/sensor combo was amazing. I have 2-metre prints on my walls from that camera. I suspect my next system (I’m on R5/R6 now) will be something like yours. Take care, Mark. Oh, and I just love your studio/office. Great to see it all for the first time. 👍🦘🇦🇺😄
Fuji has some amazing colors. Always enjoy your videos, can you tell me a little about the light you use? You are lighted so nicely on set.
Great video as usual MArk ! I’m also new to Fuji and Capture one. It would be nice to hear you taking about Capture On and how you edit your photos on it ! Thanks again !
Mark, thanks for this. Basically agree on all counts with your assessment of Fuji and their cameras and lenses. Fun to use. Easy to use. wonderful images. As an XH-1 owner, I have to take issue with your comment about firmware updates. We (XH-1 users) have been left out in the cold for years. Frustrating to say the least. Keep up the great work.
I'm super intrigued now by the difference between capture one and lightroom. I wonder if you could make a video sometime showing the differences between the two that pulled you toward capture one?
I'll probably create something like that
Very interesting (coincidence?) that just a few days ago Andy Mumford also talked about why he switched to Fujifilm and kept it with a lot of enjoyment. He will still keep shooting with X-T4 as his main camera although he also has a GFX.
Wish they kept tilting screen from previous models... much better for photography than swivel one
If you like Andy Mumford's work and vids check out Andreas Livieri as well
@@mattsiler7418 Thanks for the recommendation! Actually I began to know Mumford when he and Livieri made an episode comparing Fuji 50-140 and 55-200 lenses. I like both of them since their photo styles are similar. I have paid more attention to Mumford maybe because his accent is more to my preference. :-)
I directly started with the Fuji-System when I got more serious about photography 6 years ago. So it all started with the X-E1 then X-T2, X-T4. I really enjoy using the system, just like you mentioned. I also switched from LR to Capture One. A couple of months ago, I bought a used GFX50R with the GF32-64 and the pictures you get from the GFX system is absolutely stunning. By now I also got the 100-200 and lately the 120 Macro. I'll get out tomorrow morning with the GFX and see what I will find. 🙂
I love my Fuji XT30, switched from Nikon a couple of years ago, will be up grading soon to an XT4 or the new XH2 when it comes and will use the XT30 for the videos,also smashed my 55-200 so I will replace it with the 70--300 when I can get my hands on one. Thanks for sharing mark.
Enjoyed your video. My main cameras are a Panasonic G9 and a Fuji X-T4. I love both but the Fuji definitely has the edge in image quality. I love the tactile dials, retro looks and well built quality of the Fuji. Fuji takes a lot of guff for its subpar video autofocus capabilities and wish they addressed that in some firmware updates. I use Capture One for my Fuji and Lightroom for all else. Lightroom's latest update is killer but Capture One is in some ways still better. I wish I had the funds to get one of Fuji's medium format offerings but glad to hear you are enjoying it.
Great video Mark. This one really hits home for me. I switched from Nikon to Fuji when the X-T1 was released. At the time, Nikon was not innovating their cameras and I was looking for something new. Now I have the X-T2 and X-T4 with an assortment of lenses. I truly enjoy the system. My 10-24 is also pretty beat up. I have not made the leap to get the new version yet. The one area I am struggling is Capture 1 vs. LR. Last year I purchased C1 and used it for a while …then LR updated with their new masking features and I switched back and use enhance details to get better images from LR. Another reason: I was not finding I could get some of the more creative results I wanted in my images that I could get in LR. Your video has me second guessing that decision and thinking I should reconsider C1. Thanks for the video.
Also …hoping they bring back the better tilt screen on the X-T5!
Very nice cameras! The GFX 100 is a really nice size for a medium format camera. Doesn't look like it's any larger than my full frame Canon DSLR.
Hey Mark, love your consistency with video uploads. Been following you since just before you made the fujifilm switch from sony. Totally agree with the point you made about using something different. I think for adventure or landscape photography Fuji is really a sleeper brand. Their cameras are super solid for rugged conditions and the lightweight APSC system paired with the high end image quality is perfect for those outdoorsy type.
Thanks so much for following along with the channel Saul - really appreciate it!
I also love my Fuji (X-H1) and I switch from Canon 😉 I’ve been getting a lot of tips and tricks around Fuji from you 👍🏼 and I really hope you’re still showing edits in LR 🙏🏼
Just saw you video and the process on buying a fuji camera been looking and watch reviews on the XT-4 and wanted to ask is the grib to jold the camera is it uncomfortable caiseof the form factor cause it's too close to the lens is there a battery grip you can attach to you. I know they a build like a tank and I love that but if you can answer those question for me thatbwould be great. Like you video too
I think I found your channel because of searching for more info on the gfx100s
Mark, please comment about how powerful a computer is needed to process the hugh picture files taken with the medium format Fuji GFX-100S.
Yes. In one of Mark's videos several years ago, I remember that he kept the APC Sony partly because it would readily process on his computer.
Mark I agree with you. The Fuji cameras are just more fun to shoot with for me. I love the tactile feel of the dials. I have owned the X-T1 thru X-T4 along with the GFX 100S. I have not used Capture One. I still work with LR and PS on my files. What is the big advantage of Capture One in your opinion for the Fuji files?
Thanks Mark. I was really interested in your call out for Capture One. Would enjoy, if you ever want, to see your workflow. Fuji user, but still in LR for raw processing, organization, and printing. Have contemplated / tried the switch to C1 a few times, and I haven’t been able to close the full lifecycle loop,
I have been using the Fuji now for the last 10 years and currently own the XT4 and the x100s and absolutely love the look out of these cameras. Last month I got my first Sony camera the new A7IV and was so excited about adding Sony to my workflow until I went landscape shooting yesterday. After comparing the images from both cameras shot at the same settings, and similar focal lengths I was so shocked at how much better the Fuji images looked. The colors popped on the Fuji and Sonys colors looked muted and off colored. My Sony is a beast for video and portrait photography but a little disappointing for landscapes. I was hoping Sony would compete and I would have two stellar systems. Don’t get me wrong the Sony is a great camera but after comparing them I’ll leave the Sony at home if I’m shooting sea and landscapes. Thank you Mark for sharing your experience I agree hands down the Fuji is easier to use and more fun to shoot.
You prefer Sony for portrait photography over Fujifilm? I'd be interested to read about your experience with both for portraits specifically.
@@Elazarko I’m still comparing these two cameras I can get awesome close ups out of both. I’ve had people say, “oh I love this picture better” and it was my Fuji and the next person says, “oh I love that one better” and it turns out to be the Sony. Honestly they’re both so good, I go back and forth at times. Does one make me better? No! But the Sony is better for video for many reasons, for me the main one being no more 29 min time limit and better eye detection.
@@rich88789 yea, I understand. in general people don't notice and don't care about so many of the things photographers care about.. I think what I'm going to do is buy a A7IV and a smaller Fujifilm in the future as a small walk around/Travel setup. I wish the Fujifilm GFX 50sii had all the features of the Sony A7IV.. that would be insane!!
@@Elazarko that’s a perfect set up in my opinion. Hope you enjoy it as much as I do.
Nice rug. Looks vintage.
I have had a Canon A1 for years. It has sat on the shelf for several years as I took pictures of our children with cheap digital cameras or a phone camera. I have taken a lot of pictures while hiking, backpacking or on vacation. I have received good compliments on many of my pictures. It seems to me the vision of the photographer capturing the image plays a greater part on the outcome than the device being used. Can anyone tell if a five-dollar brush or a ten-dollar brush was used to paint a beautiful piece of art? Just grab the brush that is comfortable and paint away. Two years ago I purchased a Canon EOS R and love it and I try to use it as often as possible.
Hi Mark - thanks for that. I'd be really interested to see maybe a short series of videos from you on an intro to capture 1. I'm also a Fuji user and like you, seriously hesitated to go to Capture 1.
If the reason of the switch is that why don’t you switch to Pentax?
Bought my first camera in 2019 a FUJIFILM XT-3 I shoot mostly landscapes and occasionally street photography. All good so far but I still struggle sometimes with that worm effect on my files...
Is capture one compatible.with photoshop and some.apps like topaz or helicon?
I am a bit late to answer your question dated some 5 months ago. Anyway, i am using Xpro2 and i want to know does it make much difference between xPro2 and XT-4 since both are ASP-C camera, the reason i am asking, is that i want to get another camera ( preferably FUJI, so that i can share those x-mount lens i already have ).
I think a really good future video would be a comparison between capture one and Lightroom. My current user experience with the adobe ecosystem has been awful. The only current reason im exclusively using adobe is for the iPad compatibility. Until I recently bought a laptop, I was using my iPad Pro exclusively for editing and capture one still does not have an iPad app.
As far as adobe goes, the syncing issues are horrible. I like to cull through a shoot on the iPad sitting with a warm beverage in front of the tv. Currently if I delete images on the iPad it does not delete them from LRC because the iPad is only cloud based. For a new user the Adobe ecosystem is not even remotely user friendly.
I believe capture one is working on an iPad solution, I am looking forward to giving it a shot.
Good info. Gives you something to think about.
Thanks Victoria!
My first SLR was a Fujica ST 701!
Hello Mark, I love the Fuji system as well. I used Fujifilm exclusively in my film cameras. I love the colors. I have the SX10 which I love playing with. What lens would you recommend for birds in flight photography? I want to go to the Conowingo Dam in MD and photo eagles. I see a mix of lens reach to get decent photos of the eagles. I do want to get the 10-24 mm that you use too. I eventually want to get a T3 or T4. The GFX is also a possibility.
Thanks Mark!
The question I have is about sensor dust. Have you had to clean you sensor more, less, or about the same as your previous mirror-less cameras? Going back to you DSLR days, is the FujiFilm system sensors being cleaned more, less or the same as your DSLRs?
I really enjoy your videos. I wonder as a maker if you would concider a basic how to make a video. I say this as I recently bought the Fuji XH2 but know nothing about making a video as yet. Theres plenty of videos about the settings but nothing that Ive found so far that helps me. my other camera is aan XPro3.
Thanks good video ! I also have 2 systems and one is the GFX 100S. For landscape not usingv ery often long tele but sometimes it's useful. For the moment my longer tele is the 45 100. Considering the capability of the sensor, not sure yet if it can replace for example a 55-200 with a XT3. So more options for tele for GFX would be nice. And finally after few months experience with the GFX for landscape , the biggest limitation for me is to get everything in focus , foreground to background, even withe 23 mm.
I have the GFX 100 and Love it, sold all my Nikon .......... I just need a 600mm lens for it and all would be Perfect, I have the 250mm and the 1/4 tele and the 100-200, 45-100, 32-64, 23mm
Other then image quality, how do you like the GFX compared to the X-T3 and 4? I've heard that its kinda slow and not really an "all around camera" like the X-T4. Like it cant be used for sport very easily for instance. I guess you dont need it to be snappy for your style of photography. It would be interesting to hear what you think about it compared to the X-T3 and 4, outside of image quality. :)
Love your stuff man!
Thanks Austin!!
Could you do a video capture one vs lightroom? I tried comparing and couldn't really tell a difference.
Great video as always! I bought the 100s and my only complaint is they got rid of the d pad. Otherwise, just awesome!
Thanks for watching and I agree with you there
Before processing your photos with your current choice, did you try that one photo processor software owned by a company based in Portland OR (it has the word On in its name followed by a 1)? I have heard Fuji users express positive and better results from it compared to the software choice that you left, but is still considered the gold-standard for most other photographers.
Love the analogue style controls.
But that couldn't defend the price difference to my cheaper Sony aps-c setup.
Thanks for a great summary ✌️
The XT30 and xe4 lineup is the same price as the cheaper Sony APSC lineups. A6600 is really close to xt4 prices these days. Fuji definitely is more pricey once you accumulate alot of lenses though 😅
@@YetAnotherRcChannel you get what you pay for in terms of the quality of lenses. I wasn’t too impressed with the Sony apsc kit lens or the 55-210 but that’s just me. The sigma lenses are coming to Fuji soon so the 16mm 1.4 you mentioned should be making its way over for a similar price.
@@YetAnotherRcChannel tbh we photographers definitely split hairs when it comes to “quality” being happy and comfortable with your kit is all that matters! The people who view our photos definitely won’t tell the difference. 😂
yes because Sony APS-C is cheap, minimalistic and with less control dials (fe. no joystick, no front command dial, no dual card slot). Fuji APS-C ist overall more premium and therefore more expensive😊.
An X-S10 plus glass is not expensive for such a capable camera with IBIS etc. Gives the 6600 more than a run for it's money.
Landscape photography it is always about big depth of field, but medium format cameras like 100s has smaller area where subjects in front of camera appears sharp. Comparing of cause full with frame and crop sensor cameras. Is this specific of medium format can limits your possibilities in landscape photography? How do you unusually copes with situations when you need bigger depth of field than it is possible with your lens? How frequently such situations appear in your practice (comparing with XT-4)? I can assume that you have to use focus stacking more frequently with X100s comparing to XT4.
I used FujiFilm for five years and then in January 2020, I switched.
Now in January 2022, I got the X-T4.
Why? I missed the experience I had with the FujiFilm gear for macro.
Hi, great video and luv Fujifilm. I had the Fujifilm XT2 as well as the X-H1, sold them off and purchased the X-S10 which I absolutely love as it is so lightweight, amazing grip and IBIS. Just wondering why you purchased the GFX 100 instead of the 50R or 50S? I cannot imagine the extra burden and processing times on one’s computer system for 100 megapixel vs 50, not to mention the demand on storage.
4:30 your thoughts here really irked me for some random reason lol. I don't understand why people prefer the screen on the 100s over the XT-4? Especially in the example you showed. The XT-4 screen flips out to the exact same angle as the 100s but the hinge is on the bottom instead of the top. The screen is literally just 2 inches lower. Plus you can't protect the screen on the 100s by flipping it around during harsh weather or when carrying the camera outside of a bag. The flip and turn hinge is so much better than the other flimsy design.
Apparently I feel very strongly on camera screen hinges lmao.
really good video, i feeling and think the same !!
Thank ya!
So, does Lightroom not perform as well as Capture One on the GFX 100s Bayer sensor files? You didn't distinguish the sensor types in the processing issue.
Mark, Enjoyed your insights as always! Do you think the XT3 is a good camera in 2022?
Thanks Lynn! If video is important to you then I'd go with the X-T4, if not the X-T3 is great!
I thought the X-T3 would be better because it has a tilt screen.
Hi Mark. I just watched one of your videos where you had PPA as a sponsor. In the past there have been criticisms about the insurance. That it was hard to file a claim and insert instances didn't cover the full value. Just wanted to get your opinion on the upgraded insurance. Thanks!
Just curious. When you process Fuji files in LR, do you import the files as native Fuji raw files or convert them as Adobe DNG files? I do not know, but have gathered from misc sources that the latter works better than the former for processing Fuji files in LR. Otherwise there is some loss of detail or smearing. I'd be curious to hear your experience in the matter. Thanks.
As a kid, I enjoyed Fujifilm film. I have been in and out hobbying with photography over the past 18 years. But I've found myself investing in Canon. I would love to also invest in Fujifilm as I do love their color profiles. But I don't have the $$$.
I use Nikon D850 when I consider changing systems I just can't get past the cost benefit balance. I guess I'm just cheap or rather I know I'm cheap but I just can't see how changing would make that much of a difference. I believe the old saying it's the "Indian not the arrows".
Hi Doug. If your D850 and glass does all you want, why would you change? I shoot Fuji at the moment and the system does 95% of what I want flawlessly. The kit takes better pictures than me. Where it and I fall down is in the last 5% when I can't get close enough to some wildlife and need to crop harder than the files allow to print big. Whether that is enough to justify another body remains to be seen.
Hey!!! I am so much confused between Fujifilm XT3 and Nikon Z5….please help me. 😶😶
What camra would you recommend for a step up from a pocket camra for a new learner that is interested in taking pictures with a little better camra that's easier to use something like the Kodak camras let me know your thoughts
isn't it a limit that basically if you want to edit thae files from Fuji camera you are "Forced" to pay a subscription to Capture One?
I'm not gonna leave Fuji, that's for sure, but depending on what they release around May this year, I may be looking at a Nikon z7ii as a secondary camera for certain things. Wondering if we'll get a stacked sensor announced for one of the XH-2's released, or if there's an XT5. I've heard the flagship is moving over to XH line and XT line will be more for amateur or hobbyists. I already own a lot of X mount lenses so I'm quite sure I'll be getting a new X mount model unless I'm driven to get a GFX model - or a Nikon, depending on a few things!
Did you hear that the new Fujifilm CEO made a statement last May (I think) that they were shifting their focus to the medical and healthcare industry? Are you concerned that this shift will mean that they will fall behind on R&D especially with video, autofocus, menus, etc? My wife and I bought the X Pro-1 when it came out and upgraded to an X-T4 last year and have been enjoying it. We’re concerned, though, that our investing in the Fujifilm ecosystem (especially lenses) might not be a wise investment looking to the future.
Mark, are you giving the Aspen Ballhead a rest, or was this older B roll? Also where to do find your photography Tees I can find good ones anywhere!
When I used Nikon, it got me into photography. When I switched to the Fuji X-T4, it made me a photographer. It is hands down the best brand I’ve ever used and I don’t see myself switching. I am extremely excited to see the next X-T5. I have a feeling it’s going to be groundbreaking in the APS-C space.
Mark, thanks for this video. I also switched from Sony to Fuji (GFX100s and X100V). Just a quick question. Do you use the full pro version of Capture One or do you use the free version for Fujifilm. I'm considering diving in full with Capture One, but not sure if it is worth the price...
I really wish the Q menu on FUJI cameras would save things such as, shot timer, save data set up (RAW/ JPG), aspect ratio AND SD card slot saving style. I have to constantly change between client real estate shoots, portrait, or quick action, for example. Always gotta check the AF custom settings. Just a lot of things to change between shooting styles, and saving data styles as well. It doesn't make sense to me that these options aren't able to save on a quick menu setting. Do other camera brands allow all of the settings to be saved per custom group setting that the user programs themselves ????
This missing feature set drives me crazy as well! No reason NOT to have C1, C2, C3 to save settings for different shooting styles like Landscape, portrait, street, sports whatever...most togs shoot a bunch of different styles.
Is capture one also better with the gfx files? Because c1 is better with xtrans files but the gfx is bayer right??
It's better in my opinion
@@MarkDenneyPhoto I was just curious, because I thought xtrans makes it difficult for lightroom.
Bayer sensor raw algorithms are pretty much the same, all research I've seen is that LR vs Capture One RAW processing is a wash. I'm not spending the money or the time to change over to Capture One after researching this topic. Now, if I had the x-trans APS-C sensor, it might be worth it.
Mark, I'm also a Fuji user and enjoy the experience very much. Have you used the GFX system for Astro Landscapes? If so, how does it compare to a full frame setup? Thank you for sharing your experience and insights through your weekly videos!
Thanks, Mark, for a really good account of the Fuji system. As a Fuji user for four years, this was really timely for me. My question now is whether to upgrade to the XT4 (or5) which is heavier than the XT2 and 3, in which case I need to learn Capture One. Or do I go for the Nikon Z series, only a little heavier than the XT4, but full frame, and continue post-processing in Lightroom and Photoshop. Still undecided, but you've given me more food for thought.
Hope it was helpful Michael!
@@MarkDenneyPhoto Definitely, especially your words about using a camera that aids the photographer's creativity. Thanks very much.
I've settled on Fuji (X-E3) for my small setup, "street photography" type stuff, and have a Nikon Z for wildlife, landscape, etc... things where I'm using bigger lenses and don't mind a bigger camera. Both systems are great, and you really can't go wrong with either. I do find that Nikon has a better selection of lenses and the Z 24-200 covers 99% of my needs. Fuji has no equivalent for that one.