This is why I went with an all AMD build, 5700X3D and ASRock Phantom Gaming 7900XT. I'm done with Ngreedia and their anti-consumer ways! They trying to brainwash everyone into thinking that not running native resolution is a good thing. They can take their AI inserting fake frames and shove them where the sun don't shine.
better 7800x3D you will feel the performance and low till 0 bottleneck. 5600xt and 5700X3D are not rly enough for 7900XT and future. You can upgrade to 7800X3RD and it will be enopugh for the next 3-5 or maybe 7 years depends what happen in future. I had my 5600XT for like more than 4 years.
I said the same, did the same... and then the "AMD Driver timeout" nation attacked... i tried to turn off MPO, roll update back, down volt down clock, nothing my system is totally updated nothing is due... i never had any driver issues with Nvidia, bought AMD RX 7900 XTX and 1 week later this shit happens between randoms black screens and flickers and making me turn off stuff that i never had to turn off before.. i even went and reinstalled the whole windows, nothing i get random crashes in WoW and other games flicker for no reason. Either this shitty drivers of this 24.1.1 version or just a faulty card. But i ain't taking no chances anymore. As i write this i have already put the RX 7900 XTX into the box it came from, im sending this crap back, and Nvidia 1080ti is back into my system and she will hold the fort until i decide between a RTX 4070 Ti Super or the RTX 4080. And i honestly wish to anyone that chose go swap to AMD best of lucks i hope you guys dobt get any weird shittery like i did
@@Fordrake21Did you tried : Download the minimal driver installer. Turn your pc in safe mode. uninstalling driver with DDU in safe mode. Reinstalling drivers with minimal installer with "Driver only" option (so without Adrenalin). A friend of mine had random black screen/green screen + reboot issue with his 7800xt on a dual screen setup because of drivers. I did this and problem is solved since.
@@Fordrake21 For those who are still not returned their amd rx card may try to load the bios uefi defaults and use it in easy mode with picked xmp. Some settings in bios advanced mode can cause a lot of issues
@@Fordrake21most of these are user error, could be as simple as you’re using a daisy connection of the psu and not using individual connections or the psu not strong enough to withstand the spikes of the 7900xtx(which can cause stuttering or not booting a game) also not properly uninstalling old drivers using ddu or deleting registry key files I can name more but people need to do their research correctly before buying new cards
Well i will say that i am pretty dissapointed with the new Super GPUs becuase this makes the 7900XT and 7900XTX look even better. that warzone and cyberpunk was a large difference in fps.
@@LlonirTS Nvidia had no real plan with the Super cards, aside from the 4070 Super. Which, in my opinion, is a worthy upgrade and value over the stock 4070. However, everything else is a pure disappointment. They did in fact make the 7900XT and XTX look a lot better than before, so I'm even happier with my 7900XT, which I have overclocked to just about match the 4080 at 1440p.
Good comparison. Finally, one without 4K and Ray tracing on in every comparison, making AMD look worse than what it really is capable of. If you had an AMD CPU, the numbers would probably be even better. I know mine are always better than these benchmarks, running an AMD cpu AND gpu. Most benchmarkers are using Intel cpus.
I'm trying to figure out when gamers became some obsessed with frame rates? I guess it's due to all of the first person shooters. Honestly, anything over 60 fps is good, but people forgot how to just enjoy the game. Buy what you can afford in your budget and do proper research. Thanks for the review.
It's mostly the increased responsiveness that does it for me, it just makes it feel better to play. Can be quite transformative for some games. I usually aim for 90 fps as a nice middle ground as it both feels and looks a lot more similar to 120 fps than 60.
Definitely the responsiveness and smoothness of the frames. My 7900XT demolished my previous 6800 in basically every way, with the framepacing being a major difference in all the games I play.
What many people here don't understand: The Nvidia Super does not work with new clock rates but with TENSOR CORES! These cores are mainly made to perform with Frame Generation (DLSS3). The results shown here are only NATIVE! So switched off. If you let DLSS3 compete against FSR3 here, the Nvidia graphics card is ahead again and also saves a lot of power and temperature! So AMD has by no means "won" here, as many people wrongly write. Understand the technology!
@@bloodycorrey these people that complain dont have an nvidia 40 series card they buy the 7900xt/x and have the Fomo because they will never see dlss3 and pathtracing with good frames they will never accept that nvidia is number 1 and amd goes later with same features but not so good like nvidia but i agree the green cards are expensive # # and you can go only team green if your work with AI because of CUDA
@@domeberlin4480 I wouldn't say "worse", but rather a little different. The AMD graphics cards also have advantages, but the better image (DLSS3 vs. FSR3) is currently clearly delivered by the RTX4000 series.
@@bloodycorrey Nonsense AMD is simply better DLSS and FSR is shit and causes an input lag... AMD simply has better Rasta performance and is much cheaper... FSR is also compatible with the old generation Nvidia sucks ...
Yes the better card 1000 cash is worth it. If people can buy a Samsung Galaxy s24 than buying a rx7900xtx is reasonable. People spend on cell phones twice as much every year. Get what you want man.
Having had the $7,900 XT, and now I have the 470 TI super. I can confirm that the frame times and 1% lows are definitely shit compared to the 7900. While overall the Nvidia card tends to have more consistent high frame rates throughout a large scale of games. It also never feels as smooth as the AMD card did. And I know that probably is a funny thing to read, because people would have you believe that AMD is like super glitchy or something. Honestly I didn't experience any games whatsoever on AMD where things were skipping or lagging or acting weird. This Nvidia card the very same games I played had skipping issues and terrible frame times. I literally have to run river tuner with a 60 FPS cap then turn on VSync and it's mostly fixed. Nvidia is not this perfect product like people would have you think. It most certainly has its issues. I'm still on the fence as to whether or not I want to return this 470 TI super and get the $7,900 XT again. Because honestly I don't use ray tracing and I never will because I always want a smoother experience with no upscaling and better frame time.
What many people here don't understand: The Nvidia Super does not work with new clock rates but with TENSOR CORES! These cores are mainly made to perform with Frame Generation (DLSS3). The results shown here are only NATIVE! So switched off. If you let DLSS3 compete against FSR3 here, the Nvidia graphics card is ahead again and also saves a lot of power and temperature! So AMD has by no means "won" here, as many people wrongly write. Understand the technology!
@@selohcin That's exactly the point, congratulations. Nobody uses a graphics card that was developed for deep learning to not use it in the end. The rasterization test is useless, you nonsense^^
When i went to build my pc few weeks ago i was really supprised that my msi board still gets supported, instead pumping 300+ bucks into a new board and ram i just upgraded my ryzen 2700x to a 5800x3d and put that safed money into a oled 240hz monitor paired with my new 7900xt im more than happy. Nvidia just sold out the gamer to the ai sector. Splitting a mid range gpu "4070,4070s, 4070 s ti"3 times to squish as much profit as possible... not with me.
💥muchos dirían que la 4070 tu super tiene DLSS que es mejor el FSR peor en este segmento de GPUs que ya son de gama alta no es necesario usar DLSS y si te dará más FPS pero tendrás una peor calidad de imagen como resultado el juego se verá más feo, me quedo con 7900xt mejor experiencia de juego e verdad que también la 4070 ti super es mejor en el trazado de rayos pero es algo que te quita demaciado rendimiento y la mayoría de usuarios no lo usan por la gran perdida de rendimiento. El otro detalle es el soporte a largo plazo AMD tiene mejor soporte, en cambio Nvidia cuando saca una nueva generación de GPUs deja las nuevas tecnología para su nueva generación y no las ofrecen en las generaciones anteriores como pasado con las rtx 3000 dejo sin algunas tecnologías de DLSS a las rtx 2000 y lo mismo paso con las rtx 4000 dejo la mejor tecnología de DLSS solo para esa generación y cuando salgan las rtx 5000 sacarán una versión nueva de DLSS que no estará disponible para las rtx 4000. Y así lo hace siempre, por esa razón los usuarios veteranos saben que las gráficas Radeon envejecen mejor . El otro detalle es el precio una rx 7900xt cuasta $680 en Amazon y una 4070ti super $800 hay una gran diferencia de precio y no es mas potente (estos precios son de Amazon EEUU dia 17 septiembre 2024)
Where I live the 4070ti super is cheaper by around 150 usd, and for that money and considering scaling and RT on nvidia is better, the 4070tiS is just a better option.
went from a 7900XT to a 4070tisuper, besides the rasterized gains being minimal in either side for the games i play, having all the tech nvidia has + it being actually implemented in games was simply too much to miss, especially when here both cost the same, no driver headaches, no gpu pulling 350W+ to keep up vs the 4070tiS pulling 240w, and DLAA/DLSS is a godsend with how horrible TAA implementations tend to be. If you don't really care about the toolset nvidia gpu's have, get a GRE, cheap and powerful enough to make the XT and XTX pointless with how much more they cost, otherwise at the 700+ range, i can't justify a radeon because it's minimally faster in some rasterized games and in others it loses, while having a terrible feature set for that price range.
Finally someone who gets it. If I have to correct another "but RT doesn't matter so AMD is better" fanboy, my head is going to explode. These people are logic-resistant. AMD is good at the low and mid ranges, but at the higher end, Nvidia is simply better.
Bro, What is the best option between the 4080 and the 4070 Ti Super? I mean even with the 4080 Super, the performance will be same as 4080. If there is a 5-10 fps difference in most games, is there any benefit to the RTX 4080/ RTX 4080 Super over the RTX 4070 Ti Super?
Honestly? You're better off with the 4080 non super. Since the 4080 Super has the smallest core count increase, the jump in performance will be negligible. You're better off just applying a rough OC to a stock 4080, and you'll essentially have bridged the gap between the two already.
4070 ti super & 4080 super are both good cards just buy whatever your budget allows though something to note is a over clocked 4070ti super is equivalent to a stock 4080
@@ISoldKen 4080 and 4080 Super are way better cards than the 4070 Ti Super though.... the question, is what happens to the non-Super 4080 price - anything? The 4070 Ti Super gaming performance is disappointing - however, again, the power consumption is good compared to the AMD gpu. Why don't ppl care about that discrepancy?!? RDNA 3 gpus are power hogs!!!
I was wondering which one should I buy. Thanks to this video I know now that I gotta buy that RX 7900 XT for 650$. No way I'm paying Nvidia 820$+ for their 4070 TI Super
I did think like you as well but DLSS is not an understatement...it looks so much better than FSR in most games. Like no discernable difference from native - comparing a nvidia card with DLSS and an AMD card native would even be fair because of that, and the nvidia one would be getting a ton more FPS. Not to mention spending so much money and not being able to turn on some more intensive ray tracing sliders really does suck. Don't get me wrong, you chose nicely as well, but me personally I was willing to pay the extra.
Only in heavy RT gaming, but in the end both are unplayable. In medium to light RT theyre actually pretty tied. The 7900xt even comes ahead in some scenarios. Source: Gamers Nexus @@legiion8238
Nvidia will almost certainly win in RT in every game. Their solution is just more robust and further along in development. AMD will get there eventually, but this generation of cards is done for RT/PT/. Personally for me, RT just isn't worth it at this point. Maybe in 2-3 years. We will see.
@@ProduktOfEv0lution be better still if you dont know what youre talking about i own the 4070ti super and can play cyberpunk on 4k raytracing cranked to everything max and path tracing work also no problem i dont think the 7900xt can do it
вот на днях иду в магазин, пока предпочтение хочется отдать 7900хт. По производительности как я понял примерно 15%, по цене разница еще больше, опять же в сторону 7900хт. максимум почему бы я взял 4070ти супер, это хорошая скидка, стоили бы одинаково, взял бы зеленку😊
OMG the i-9-14900K consume is insane 190Watts 🤪 the grafic card AMD it a processor AMD have more performance i have 7800X3D and Sapphire Pulse RX 7900 XT 20GB and the consume 7800X3D is 35 watts 55 watts play games 😅 but intél is crazy dam 🤣
Honestly I’ve been considering selling my rx 7900 xt. I’ve had it for almost a year and my 2 main games I play fortnite and halo infinite run better on rtx cards, but the other games I play, I’ve seen in bench marks run close to the same, an plus I needa get some money to help me upgrade the rest of my system
I would definitely recommend the Rx 7900 xt and amd, the features are cool, and the software is amazing, easy to use. Every issue I’ve had has been a error so highly recommend
i wanna get rid of my amd card, 6700 non xt, my drivers crash and i have to re install them often, thats whats keeping me from going with the 7900xt, im leaning to the 4070 ti
@@roachboypoggies9640 Opposite for me. 4070 ti super runs like crap. Had a game crash, and frametimes are TERRIBLE as you can even see in this video. I returned my perfectly working 7900 xt (never had a single crash or issue of any kind) and got the 4070 ti super. games hitch, stutter and it's a known issue.
If AMD can launch an 8800 XT for $550-600, which should have performance within the ballpark of the 4070 TiS and RT around a 4070 S, it would be a massive success.
This makes the 4070 Ti S look very bad considering it is currently selling for around $50-100 MORE than what the 7900 XT is as of writing this comment.
What many people here don't understand: The Nvidia Super does not work with new clock rates but with TENSOR CORES! These cores are mainly made to perform with Frame Generation (DLSS3). The results shown here are only NATIVE! So switched off. If you let DLSS3 compete against FSR3 here, the Nvidia graphics card is ahead again and also saves a lot of power and temperature! So AMD has by no means "won" here, as many people wrongly write. Understand the technology!
@@bloodycorrey Lol. Good DLSS performance is no excuse to run games worse natively. Upscaling tech is a bonus, not a replacement for running at native resolution
would it be too much to ask for you to add dayz to these benchmarks? I know it's kind of a niche game and not mainstream but it has a history of not doing well with amd cards, and seeing that the 7900 xt generally performs better than 4070 ti super in these benchmarks, while way cheaper.
7900XT looks solid in raster. These GPU are both perfect for 1440p, so as a gamer i would go for the AMD card, but as a gamer/creator 4070tisuper has an advantage. They both suck overall, tho.
4070 ti super pricds went donwn well, im waiting when 7900 xt prices decrease, and first lowest price i saw in my country for 690 euro which is crazy. 4070 ti S for 740 euro. For sure better to choose 4070 ti S at this moment, DLSS is worth to pay more, even 7900 is faster at native resolutions. But if it went down like for 580 euros -+, then i will choose 7900. Lets see what will happen with prices after 2 months.
Дллс нужен только для тех, кто хочет видеть счётчик фреймтайма выше чем без, к реальному игровому процессу это не имеет никакого отношения.У тебя добавляется высокая задержка ввода, игра превращается в кисель. Поэтому лучше играть в нативе без дллс, разрывы можно нивелировать g-sync или free-sync. И вообще если говорить про всю эту историю а киберспортивных дисциплинах, там это вообще все уходит на нет, потому что важна только сухая производительность. Поэтому каждый сам для себя пусть решает что ему лучше. Nvidia безусловно для работы является лидером.
Прочитал твой коммент, представляя умственно отсталого аборигена. Сгенерированые ии кадры никак не связаны с реальной производительностью, никак вы не поймете фанатки хуанга.
Those were some pretty disappointing frames for the 4070 ti super in Warzone. Jeez that was the gpu on my radar but that does not look like I am going to get what I pay for. My 3060 ti gets 120 avg on 1440p balanced. crazy....
4070 super gives you 180 - 250 fps in Warzone with competitive setting, TI is even better, IDK what settings this guy is using but fps are definetly not that low
He is running extreme but i still feel like they should be a bit more but idk. Could have a lot of programs running in the background. I am going to look at a lot more benchmark videos before i make a decision.
@@AltHunterTCG No, there are no background programs running. I recorded with a dual PC setup (no FPS loss). However, the benchmark scene is very GPU-heavy. The full benchmark sequence - ruclips.net/video/zl9CkbzJjUc/видео.html
ti super way better with all features nvidia can you provide, im now using amd card, but after rtx its so bad to see fsr looks so bad after dlss, dlss looks like native or better with sharpening filter, dlss frame gen works really good and you can turn on ray tracing, thats a really good experience
I would never understand people saying DLSS looks much better than FSR? Do you people play at 10cm from your monitor? Even if so I can't really tell much of a difference, I would say 5-10% better in favour of DLSS, but still I use both AMD and NVIDIA
@@maho8204 tbh I tested Fsr with Nvidia gpu on the 3 known resolution 1080p, 1440p, 4k Dlss is much better more sharp also Im using a 4k 50' Tv 120hz refresh rate so I can tell the difference .. But the key assets here is FG lets C what FSR3 could do, there's possibility Amd could reverse the table on Nvidia since they made fsr 3 open source to everyone
@@homsterluder5364 that's a potato PC. i can play Wukong on high settings with RT max DLSSQ+FG with 90-120fps. :D Nvidia does not tank your FPS massively unlike Radeon.
According to the steam survey ~76% of all gamers are still using Nvidia GPUs. Why isn't it 90% for AMD, when everyone claims that they are so much better?
AMD fanboys are a very vocal minority. Thankfully most people aren't dumb enough to fall for their lies and can see that Nvidia has the better product.
@@verde5738 The fanboy hath spoken. Have fun overpaying for cards that become obsolete in a generation. I'm still playing every modern game with my 6700XT with zero driver issues anf with high framerates
Awesome video keep it up I think bruh to be fair do another video comparison with same title games with RT on & FG on aswel it'll be very interesting TY on 4k & 14440p
@@ERIC-WRIGHT for you may be, but many gamers would like to see the wow effects of nice graphics, this is the biggest motivation to buy latest greatest graphics cards, if not just play in low graphics with your existing card
@@trexeyesonly55 Cyberpunk 2077 4K Graphic High -> Normal 100FPS+ | Ray tracing 50FPS - + | Path tracing 30FPS - + | Sorry but it only looks slightly better and it's just not worth it because it's overrated. which WoW effect?
@@ERIC-WRIGHT you buy AMD now or why you try to convince me? First you said RT is not important and now you try to convince me AMD is doing similar (which is not)
People never consider the electricity bill… Nvidia consumes less power, you end up saving more money in the long run, plus they have the lead in software.
@@RocketRat8YT Usually when you buy a 700$+ GPU, you want it to come with all the premium features, and currently only Nvidia gives you access to all the premium features, along with superior power efficiency, which is just the cherry on top. I can assure you, that at the higher end on the GPU spectrum, Nvidia offers the substantially superior product.
Crazy how AMD needs 30% more preformance for 30% less money to split sales with Nvidia. Funny how AMD as red looks like wrong answer and Green for Nvidia looks like right answer.
Except the 4070 ti super has micro stuttering issues and bad frametimes, as you can even see in this video. Nvidia waited months to try and fix it, they released the patch and it still runs like shit. The 7900 xt was buttery smooth.
NVIDEA is only better in Raytracing, but AMD upgrading their FSR ...now 3.1 then later 3.2 and 3.3 and we will nearly 100% same performance at raytracing and same qualitiy.
nvidia: rtx 4070 rtx 4070 super rtx 4070 ti rtx 4070 ti super rtx 4070 mega rtx 4070 ti mega rtx 4070 ti mega super rtx 4070 giga rtx 4070 ti giga rtx 4070 ti giga mega rtx 4070 ti giga mega super rtx 4070 ti giga mega super hyper hulky bulky mulky lucky ducky monkey money ATI: Radeon 7900xt
Nvidia keeps relying on dlss to make up for charging more for less performance, ill stick with amd and what ever raw rasterization i can get out of the 7900xtx i gut used for 600 dollars...
Пиздежь и провокация. В моих тестах всё иначе. Разбежка в 5-10 фпс в пользу 7900xt. При этом все кординально меняется при включении лучей. С лучами 15-30 фпс в пользу 4070 TiS. Радеоны, как были говном, так и остались. Не утешайте сами себя.
What many people here don't understand: The Nvidia Super does not work with new clock rates but with TENSOR CORES! These cores are mainly made to perform with Frame Generation (DLSS3). The results shown here are only NATIVE! So switched off. If you let DLSS3 compete against FSR3 here, the Nvidia graphics card is ahead again and also saves a lot of power and temperature! So AMD has by no means "won" here, as many people wrongly write. Understand the technology!
@@bloodycorrey Sorry pal, You gotta realize one thing. People are paying for Nvidia and features NOT ALL GAMES SUPPORT. DLSS is popular but Frame gen isn't and that's what they're trying to sell you with the 40 series to compete. And even then, its only in a fair select few titles people even care about. In reality, the PC space is loaded with more indie and early access gamers than triple A which support that stuff. So think again. And no sweet little AMD fan boy. I'm speaking from experience of owning both for shits and giggles. When I traded a 6950 for a 3090 the only thing I gained was broadcast. When it came to FPS, the 6950 was miles ahead and far smoother gameplay and GAME DETAIL was better too, if you don't know parallax, then sit down. They're both equal when it comes to game play any more though with 7 and 4 series both, but that frame gen crap has to go. FOR BOTH COMPANIES! It's useless and over selling.
@@FatherLamb One is ideology, about the pros and cons. The other is how the technology behind it works. Please differentiate. I myself am not a fan of the Nvidia marketing and think that such a technology should be for everyone, please don't misunderstand.
@@nickwu4384 u say amd is not better cuz ray tracing ,,, most of ppl doesnt care about rt .. ray tracing is new tech .. and going to be enough good in 2030 .. so amd for the win!!!!! amd still have time to catch up rt nvidia..!
@@dabidflor9563 It must hurt your heart to see that AMD is really this good. Go buy it yourself and see for your yourself. My 7800XT a bought just one month ago performs way better than what you see depicted by content creators. I was so impressed with the rasterization performance of the 7800XT that I bought a 7900XT too which arrives today UPS. AMD has now caught up to and surpasses Nvidia DLSS with their FSR 3 in UE5 as well. Saw the video just yesterday where FSR 3 was clearly superior to DLSS in quality mode. NVidia still had the slightly better image in performance mode however. Go see for yourself and stop allow Nvida to scam you. That is what Nvidia has become in their greed. They are now forced to released these Super cards with more RAM because AMD gives you more RAM for longevity. Nvida knew all along that the RAM they were giving you would not be enough for very long. They knew what games were in the works and would be needing more RAM before the public but over and over chose to release their cards with the paltry RAM anyway. That is the very definition of a scam. AMD has also made great gains in their RT performance. If I see you're greedy I'll never buy from you again.
What many people here don't understand: The Nvidia Super does not work with new clock rates but with TENSOR CORES! These cores are mainly made to perform with Frame Generation (DLSS3). The results shown here are only NATIVE! So switched off. If you let DLSS3 compete against FSR3 here, the Nvidia graphics card is ahead again and also saves a lot of power and temperature! So AMD has by no means "won" here, as many people wrongly write. Understand the technology!
💻 *PC Specs - Buy on Amazon / Newegg*
Zotac RTX 4070 Ti SUPER Trinity Black ED - geni.us/9idrc
AMD RX 7900 XT MBA - geni.us/ovTGt4
Intel Core i9-14900K - geni.us/qYpgQeA
ASUS TUF Gaming Z690-Plus - geni.us/Q7g3
G.Skill Trident Z5 2x16GB, 6000 CL36-36-36-96 - geni.us/dznN
Streacom BC1 Open Benchtable - geni.us/9PgRsf8
Custom water cooled (CPU) - MO-RA 360, EK-Quantum Velocity Full Nickel
*GPU-Z Validation:*
4070 Ti SUPER - www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/details/3gz6k
7900 XT - www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/details/w57a2/
*CPU-Z Validation:*
4070 Ti SUPER - valid.x86.fr/93bxbi
7900 XT - valid.x86.fr/5rxutd
Setup: bit.ly/3H117uA
🎮 *Games*
00:00 Call of Duty: Warzone 3
00:42 Starfield
01:26 The Last of Us Part 1
02:23 Alan Wake 2 | DLSS, FSR Quality
03:07 Remnant 2
03:48 Star Wars Jedi Survivor
04:28 Cyberpunk 2077
05:14 Hogwarts Legacy
05:58 Forza Motorsport
06:34 RoboCop: Rogue City
07:12 A Plague Tale Requiem
07:51 Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart
08:38 Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora
09:24 Dead Space
10:04 Immortals of Aveum
Intel CPU: PL1 & PL2 disabled, stock
GPU: rBAR enabled, stock
OS: Windows 11
🎥 Recorded with dual PC Setup (No FPS loss, but screen tearing..)
AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K, GC573 - amzn.to/39ODnJn
📊 Overlay - MSI Afterburner, Rivatuner, HWiNFO
Frametime graph: 0 - 50ms
This is why I went with an all AMD build, 5700X3D and ASRock Phantom Gaming 7900XT. I'm done with Ngreedia and their anti-consumer ways! They trying to brainwash everyone into thinking that not running native resolution is a good thing. They can take their AI inserting fake frames and shove them where the sun don't shine.
Amen
Ong
How's your performance right now? I'm gonna switch to 7900XT/XTX same model as yours. 1080p144 or 4K60/120 (Oled BX).
better 7800x3D you will feel the performance and low till 0 bottleneck. 5600xt and 5700X3D are not rly enough for 7900XT and future. You can upgrade to 7800X3RD and it will be enopugh for the next 3-5 or maybe 7 years depends what happen in future. I had my 5600XT for like more than 4 years.
@@richvspoor2652 what do yu think about i514600kf for the 7900xt?
I went ahead and bought a 7900 xt after I saw the ti super reviews. Nvidia just not worth it and way too costly
I said the same, did the same... and then the "AMD Driver timeout" nation attacked... i tried to turn off MPO, roll update back, down volt down clock, nothing my system is totally updated nothing is due... i never had any driver issues with Nvidia, bought AMD RX 7900 XTX and 1 week later this shit happens between randoms black screens and flickers and making me turn off stuff that i never had to turn off before.. i even went and reinstalled the whole windows, nothing i get random crashes in WoW and other games flicker for no reason.
Either this shitty drivers of this 24.1.1 version or just a faulty card. But i ain't taking no chances anymore.
As i write this i have already put the RX 7900 XTX into the box it came from, im sending this crap back, and Nvidia 1080ti is back into my system and she will hold the fort until i decide between a RTX 4070 Ti Super or the RTX 4080. And i honestly wish to anyone that chose go swap to AMD best of lucks i hope you guys dobt get any weird shittery like i did
Had a 5700 xt in another rig ran awesome to this day sounds like you just got an unlucky lemon. I’ve gotten more Nvidia lemons tho
@@Fordrake21Did you tried : Download the minimal driver installer. Turn your pc in safe mode. uninstalling driver with DDU in safe mode. Reinstalling drivers with minimal installer with "Driver only" option (so without Adrenalin). A friend of mine had random black screen/green screen + reboot issue with his 7800xt on a dual screen setup because of drivers. I did this and problem is solved since.
@@Fordrake21 For those who are still not returned their amd rx card may try to load the bios uefi defaults and use it in easy mode with picked xmp. Some settings in bios advanced mode can cause a lot of issues
@@Fordrake21most of these are user error, could be as simple as you’re using a daisy connection of the psu and not using individual connections or the psu not strong enough to withstand the spikes of the 7900xtx(which can cause stuttering or not booting a game) also not properly uninstalling old drivers using ddu or deleting registry key files I can name more but people need to do their research correctly before buying new cards
Well i will say that i am pretty dissapointed with the new Super GPUs becuase this makes the 7900XT and 7900XTX look even better. that warzone and cyberpunk was a large difference in fps.
Very tempted to return my 4070ti super when it arrives.
@@LlonirTS Nvidia had no real plan with the Super cards, aside from the 4070 Super. Which, in my opinion, is a worthy upgrade and value over the stock 4070. However, everything else is a pure disappointment. They did in fact make the 7900XT and XTX look a lot better than before, so I'm even happier with my 7900XT, which I have overclocked to just about match the 4080 at 1440p.
@AnonymousUser-ww6ns I'd do it lmao
Yep, I actually want a 4080Super and i already have a 7900xt. Im leaning more towards keeping my card now until the next generation. @@joshuapicarello
@@ProduktOfEv0lution I would keep it for now.
Good comparison. Finally, one without 4K and Ray tracing on in every comparison, making AMD look worse than what it really is capable of. If you had an AMD CPU, the numbers would probably be even better. I know mine are always better than these benchmarks, running an AMD cpu AND gpu. Most benchmarkers are using Intel cpus.
The problem is that game devs will transition to RT native engines, and if AMD doesn't catch up there, they'll become irrelevant...
I'm trying to figure out when gamers became some obsessed with frame rates? I guess it's due to all of the first person shooters. Honestly, anything over 60 fps is good, but people forgot how to just enjoy the game. Buy what you can afford in your budget and do proper research. Thanks for the review.
It's mostly the increased responsiveness that does it for me, it just makes it feel better to play. Can be quite transformative for some games. I usually aim for 90 fps as a nice middle ground as it both feels and looks a lot more similar to 120 fps than 60.
Definitely the responsiveness and smoothness of the frames. My 7900XT demolished my previous 6800 in basically every way, with the framepacing being a major difference in all the games I play.
You're right, as framerate is useless, let's pay more for less frames :) who cares after all, give more money to Nvidia for a worse experience !
Ever since devs stopped making games based on good story telling like undertale and more on the game looks pretty
because we want the competitive edge and something capable of keeping 360-540fps to match our monitors, so basically responsiveness
7900 XT 770€ vs 4070 Ti super 880€ in Germany---> AMD WINs
only if you want no raytracing and if you want to have another now and then hikups with your amd card
What many people here don't understand:
The Nvidia Super does not work with new clock rates but with TENSOR CORES!
These cores are mainly made to perform with Frame Generation (DLSS3).
The results shown here are only NATIVE! So switched off.
If you let DLSS3 compete against FSR3 here, the Nvidia graphics card is ahead again and also saves a lot of power and temperature!
So AMD has by no means "won" here, as many people wrongly write.
Understand the technology!
@@bloodycorrey these people that complain dont have an nvidia 40 series card they buy the 7900xt/x and have the Fomo because they will never see dlss3 and pathtracing with good frames
they will never accept that nvidia is number 1 and amd goes later with same features but not so good like nvidia
but i agree the green cards are expensive #
#
and you can go only team green if your work with AI because of CUDA
@@domeberlin4480 I wouldn't say "worse", but rather a little different. The AMD graphics cards also have advantages, but the better image (DLSS3 vs. FSR3) is currently clearly delivered by the RTX4000 series.
@@bloodycorrey Nonsense AMD is simply better DLSS and FSR is shit and causes an input lag... AMD simply has better Rasta performance and is much cheaper... FSR is also compatible with the old generation Nvidia sucks ...
The 7900xt just dropped to 699 so its very very hard to beat right now.
In Italy 670€, 7900XT rn is insane
fuck it this convince me to get new case so I can buy a 7900xTx . I might as well spend the extra money for more Vram .
Yes the better card 1000 cash is worth it. If people can buy a Samsung Galaxy s24 than buying a rx7900xtx is reasonable. People spend on cell phones twice as much every year. Get what you want man.
@@justhomas83 I have the S24 Ultra & Fold 5
this comment made me laugh
@justhomas83 a phone is an entire system...
Having had the $7,900 XT, and now I have the 470 TI super.
I can confirm that the frame times and 1% lows are definitely shit compared to the 7900.
While overall the Nvidia card tends to have more consistent high frame rates throughout a large scale of games.
It also never feels as smooth as the AMD card did.
And I know that probably is a funny thing to read, because people would have you believe that AMD is like super glitchy or something.
Honestly I didn't experience any games whatsoever on AMD where things were skipping or lagging or acting weird.
This Nvidia card the very same games I played had skipping issues and terrible frame times. I literally have to run river tuner with a 60 FPS cap then turn on VSync and it's mostly fixed.
Nvidia is not this perfect product like people would have you think. It most certainly has its issues.
I'm still on the fence as to whether or not I want to return this 470 TI super and get the $7,900 XT again.
Because honestly I don't use ray tracing and I never will because I always want a smoother experience with no upscaling and better frame time.
4070 not 470
was this written by a bot?
In the end , with higher end cards all are good , for 2k at least . Only matter is which one have the better price when youre ready to checkout.
can sombody explain wtf the power cosumption of the AMD card is wtf?
The 7900XT was 15% faster or more in six of the fifteen games.
What many people here don't understand:
The Nvidia Super does not work with new clock rates but with TENSOR CORES!
These cores are mainly made to perform with Frame Generation (DLSS3).
The results shown here are only NATIVE! So switched off.
If you let DLSS3 compete against FSR3 here, the Nvidia graphics card is ahead again and also saves a lot of power and temperature!
So AMD has by no means "won" here, as many people wrongly write.
Understand the technology!
@@bloodycorrey I did not say that. You responded to something I did not say.
@@selohcin It's about the comparison between the two graphics cards (Nvidia vs AMD) and you write that AMD is 15% faster. How was it meant then?
You wrote nonsense about the tensor cores when this test clearly was not using DLSS. This is a rasterization test.
@@selohcin That's exactly the point, congratulations. Nobody uses a graphics card that was developed for deep learning to not use it in the end. The rasterization test is useless, you nonsense^^
so the 7900 XT is better is what im getting from this
When i went to build my pc few weeks ago i was really supprised that my msi board still gets supported, instead pumping 300+ bucks into a new board and ram i just upgraded my ryzen 2700x to a 5800x3d and put that safed money into a oled 240hz monitor paired with my new 7900xt im more than happy. Nvidia just sold out the gamer to the ai sector. Splitting a mid range gpu "4070,4070s, 4070 s ti"3 times to squish as much profit as possible... not with me.
graphics preset being auto will change the presets for each card??
I check the graphics settings for each benchmark run.
In prime day 7900xt is $615 compare to cheapest 800 for 4070 ti super.
💥muchos dirían que la 4070 tu super tiene DLSS que es mejor el FSR peor en este segmento de GPUs que ya son de gama alta no es necesario usar DLSS y si te dará más FPS pero tendrás una peor calidad de imagen como resultado el juego se verá más feo, me quedo con 7900xt mejor experiencia de juego e verdad que también la 4070 ti super es mejor en el trazado de rayos pero es algo que te quita demaciado rendimiento y la mayoría de usuarios no lo usan por la gran perdida de rendimiento. El otro detalle es el soporte a largo plazo AMD tiene mejor soporte, en cambio Nvidia cuando saca una nueva generación de GPUs deja las nuevas tecnología para su nueva generación y no las ofrecen en las generaciones anteriores como pasado con las rtx 3000 dejo sin algunas tecnologías de DLSS a las rtx 2000 y lo mismo paso con las rtx 4000 dejo la mejor tecnología de DLSS solo para esa generación y cuando salgan las rtx 5000 sacarán una versión nueva de DLSS que no estará disponible para las rtx 4000. Y así lo hace siempre, por esa razón los usuarios veteranos saben que las gráficas Radeon envejecen mejor . El otro detalle es el precio una rx 7900xt cuasta $680 en Amazon y una 4070ti super $800 hay una gran diferencia de precio y no es mas potente (estos precios son de Amazon EEUU dia 17 septiembre 2024)
Where I live the 4070ti super is cheaper by around 150 usd, and for that money and considering scaling and RT on nvidia is better, the 4070tiS is just a better option.
7800x3d + RX 7900XT Here it's super happy playing everything at maximum in 4k.
went from a 7900XT to a 4070tisuper, besides the rasterized gains being minimal in either side for the games i play, having all the tech nvidia has + it being actually implemented in games was simply too much to miss, especially when here both cost the same, no driver headaches, no gpu pulling 350W+ to keep up vs the 4070tiS pulling 240w, and DLAA/DLSS is a godsend with how horrible TAA implementations tend to be.
If you don't really care about the toolset nvidia gpu's have, get a GRE, cheap and powerful enough to make the XT and XTX pointless with how much more they cost, otherwise at the 700+ range, i can't justify a radeon because it's minimally faster in some rasterized games and in others it loses, while having a terrible feature set for that price range.
Finally someone who gets it. If I have to correct another "but RT doesn't matter so AMD is better" fanboy, my head is going to explode. These people are logic-resistant. AMD is good at the low and mid ranges, but at the higher end, Nvidia is simply better.
A gpu pulling 350W is insane
Bro, What is the best option between the 4080 and the 4070 Ti Super?
I mean even with the 4080 Super, the performance will be same as 4080.
If there is a 5-10 fps difference in most games, is there any benefit to the RTX 4080/ RTX 4080 Super over the RTX 4070 Ti Super?
Honestly? You're better off with the 4080 non super. Since the 4080 Super has the smallest core count increase, the jump in performance will be negligible. You're better off just applying a rough OC to a stock 4080, and you'll essentially have bridged the gap between the two already.
@@joshuapicarello4080 is pricier than the 4080 super tho.
and the 4070 Ti Super isn't too much slower.
Fucking ladder pricing 🙄
@ArnikoGiri that's true. Forgot it was going to be $200 less, at least we hope.
4070 ti super & 4080 super are both good cards just buy whatever your budget allows
though something to note is a over clocked 4070ti super is equivalent to a stock 4080
@@ISoldKen 4080 and 4080 Super are way better cards than the 4070 Ti Super though.... the question, is what happens to the non-Super 4080 price - anything? The 4070 Ti Super gaming performance is disappointing - however, again, the power consumption is good compared to the AMD gpu. Why don't ppl care about that discrepancy?!? RDNA 3 gpus are power hogs!!!
I was wondering which one should I buy. Thanks to this video I know now that I gotta buy that RX 7900 XT for 650$. No way I'm paying Nvidia 820$+ for their 4070 TI Super
I did think like you as well but DLSS is not an understatement...it looks so much better than FSR in most games. Like no discernable difference from native - comparing a nvidia card with DLSS and an AMD card native would even be fair because of that, and the nvidia one would be getting a ton more FPS.
Not to mention spending so much money and not being able to turn on some more intensive ray tracing sliders really does suck.
Don't get me wrong, you chose nicely as well, but me personally I was willing to pay the extra.
Will the 21:9 bench have RT comparisons? That review will be the deciding factor if I get keep or return the 4070 ti super.
In rt 4070ti super is better
Only in heavy RT gaming, but in the end both are unplayable. In medium to light RT theyre actually pretty tied. The 7900xt even comes ahead in some scenarios. Source: Gamers Nexus @@legiion8238
Nvidia will almost certainly win in RT in every game. Their solution is just more robust and further along in development. AMD will get there eventually, but this generation of cards is done for RT/PT/. Personally for me, RT just isn't worth it at this point. Maybe in 2-3 years. We will see.
@@ProduktOfEv0lution be better still if you dont know what youre talking about i own the 4070ti super and can play cyberpunk on 4k raytracing cranked to everything max
and path tracing work also no problem
i dont think the 7900xt can do it
Yah, okay. And youre not using DLSS? Exactly. stfu. @@domeberlin4480
Я до сих пор в шоке с ценовой политики Nvidia. Rx 7900 xt более производительна и стоит дешевле. Новые карты от куртки Хуанга не стоят того.
вот на днях иду в магазин, пока предпочтение хочется отдать 7900хт. По производительности как я понял примерно 15%, по цене разница еще больше, опять же в сторону 7900хт.
максимум почему бы я взял 4070ти супер, это хорошая скидка, стоили бы одинаково, взял бы зеленку😊
@@SHINOBIE-b6l не знаю о каких скидках идет речь. Сами карты амд щас стоят дешевле. Например, в ДНС очень хорошие предложения
OMG the i-9-14900K consume is insane 190Watts 🤪 the grafic card AMD it a processor AMD have more performance i have 7800X3D and Sapphire Pulse RX 7900 XT 20GB and the consume 7800X3D is 35 watts 55 watts play games 😅 but intél is crazy dam 🤣
its true and videos everywhere for that
the intel power consumptions i mean
their boost have this 2nd power limiter that can add up to 300w
meanwhile ryzens tdps are the actual watt used
Honestly I’ve been considering selling my rx 7900 xt. I’ve had it for almost a year and my 2 main games I play fortnite and halo infinite run better on rtx cards, but the other games I play, I’ve seen in bench marks run close to the same, an plus I needa get some money to help me upgrade the rest of my system
I would definitely recommend the Rx 7900 xt and amd, the features are cool, and the software is amazing, easy to use. Every issue I’ve had has been a error so highly recommend
i wanna get rid of my amd card, 6700 non xt, my drivers crash and i have to re install them often, thats whats keeping me from going with the 7900xt, im leaning to the 4070 ti
@@roachboypoggies9640 get the 4070 ti super
@@roachboypoggies9640 Opposite for me.
4070 ti super runs like crap. Had a game crash, and frametimes are TERRIBLE as you can even see in this video.
I returned my perfectly working 7900 xt (never had a single crash or issue of any kind) and got the 4070 ti super.
games hitch, stutter and it's a known issue.
@@TheRandomDude-qy1evmy ti super runs like a charm at uwqhd.
If AMD can launch an 8800 XT for $550-600, which should have performance within the ballpark of the 4070 TiS and RT around a 4070 S, it would be a massive success.
Where CS2, ETF, Diablo4 ?
This makes the 4070 Ti S look very bad considering it is currently selling for around $50-100 MORE than what the 7900 XT is as of writing this comment.
What many people here don't understand:
The Nvidia Super does not work with new clock rates but with TENSOR CORES!
These cores are mainly made to perform with Frame Generation (DLSS3).
The results shown here are only NATIVE! So switched off.
If you let DLSS3 compete against FSR3 here, the Nvidia graphics card is ahead again and also saves a lot of power and temperature!
So AMD has by no means "won" here, as many people wrongly write.
Understand the technology!
@@bloodycorrey Get a fucking life dude!
@@bloodycorrey Lol. Good DLSS performance is no excuse to run games worse natively. Upscaling tech is a bonus, not a replacement for running at native resolution
@@miha1999grobar omfg ,read and understand....
@@miha1999grobar why would you do DLSS performance when 4070TiS can run at 100fps above with DLSS Q?
I have 7900 xt white from Asrock and it is a very quiet with a good performance card
problem is the better ti super models are more expensive than even the 7900xtx..... This nvidia card should be compared to the XTX
It´s crazy to pay 700-800€ for a GPU to get arround 100 FPS in WQHD.
would it be too much to ask for you to add dayz to these benchmarks? I know it's kind of a niche game and not mainstream but it has a history of not doing well with amd cards, and seeing that the 7900 xt generally performs better than 4070 ti super in these benchmarks, while way cheaper.
Got my rx 7900 xt for $700. Best decision ever made. Wished I bought the 7800x3d with it though.
can 4070 enough 650w psu ?
Plz reply !!
You could run the 4070 on a 550W if you wanted, so long as total system usage doesn't exceed 80% of the PSUs rating.
Yes.
@@joshuapicarello U totally right !
a couple of cards need at least 700W , u have to check with the card u want to buy what psu it needs
dlcdnets.asus.com/pub/ASUS/Accessory/Power_Supply/Manual/RECOMMENDED_PSU_TABLE.pdf
Damn. You had 69 likes before I clicked.
Sorry.
😱😱😱
What are you doing all day, bro? 😜
7900XT looks solid in raster. These GPU are both perfect for 1440p, so as a gamer i would go for the AMD card, but as a gamer/creator 4070tisuper has an advantage.
They both suck overall, tho.
4070 ti super pricds went donwn well, im waiting when 7900 xt prices decrease, and first lowest price i saw in my country for 690 euro which is crazy. 4070 ti S for 740 euro. For sure better to choose 4070 ti S at this moment, DLSS is worth to pay more, even 7900 is faster at native resolutions. But if it went down like for 580 euros -+, then i will choose 7900. Lets see what will happen with prices after 2 months.
А с длсс тоже прирост у амд? 😀
Дллс нужен только для тех, кто хочет видеть счётчик фреймтайма выше чем без, к реальному игровому процессу это не имеет никакого отношения.У тебя добавляется высокая задержка ввода, игра превращается в кисель. Поэтому лучше играть в нативе без дллс, разрывы можно нивелировать g-sync или free-sync. И вообще если говорить про всю эту историю а киберспортивных дисциплинах, там это вообще все уходит на нет, потому что важна только сухая производительность. Поэтому каждый сам для себя пусть решает что ему лучше. Nvidia безусловно для работы является лидером.
Прочитал твой коммент, представляя умственно отсталого аборигена. Сгенерированые ии кадры никак не связаны с реальной производительностью, никак вы не поймете фанатки хуанга.
In my place 7900 xt is more expensive than 4070 ti s
the problem is that the 4070 ti s is made for the extra stuff like frame generation and rs so it isn't a fair comparison
Idk, 4070 super and rx 7800 xt are pretty even but 4070 has ray tracing, it it fair there where nvidia has an advantage?
@@Meme_Sage RAYTRACING ES EL MAYOR ENGAÑO
That gets supressed by FSR 3, so AMD and NVIDIA are quite much equal in features, but AMD offers those features in older cards so its a win for AMD
they handle rt worse that's the problem. Btw don't forget frame generation@@PanchoGDMKWii
@@Dino_Nugg_Devour FSR 3 has FG, thats why I mentioned it
Just a minority care about RT honestly
Хочу взять 7900XT, но у меня i7 9700K, разрешение 1440p. Не будет ли упираться в процессор?
Go for 7800X3D 🗿
Those were some pretty disappointing frames for the 4070 ti super in Warzone. Jeez that was the gpu on my radar but that does not look like I am going to get what I pay for. My 3060 ti gets 120 avg on 1440p balanced. crazy....
4070 super gives you 180 - 250 fps in Warzone with competitive setting, TI is even better, IDK what settings this guy is using but fps are definetly not that low
He is running extreme but i still feel like they should be a bit more but idk. Could have a lot of programs running in the background. I am going to look at a lot more benchmark videos before i make a decision.
@@AltHunterTCG No, there are no background programs running. I recorded with a dual PC setup (no FPS loss).
However, the benchmark scene is very GPU-heavy. The full benchmark sequence - ruclips.net/video/zl9CkbzJjUc/видео.html
@@AltHunterTCGi have a 4070 Ti and i get the same FPS in Warzone on 1440p Max Settings possible so thats BS!
ti super way better with all features nvidia can you provide, im now using amd card, but after rtx its so bad to see fsr looks so bad after dlss, dlss looks like native or better with sharpening filter, dlss frame gen works really good and you can turn on ray tracing, thats a really good experience
I agree with you Nvidia feature beat Amd in that precise point
I would never understand people saying DLSS looks much better than FSR? Do you people play at 10cm from your monitor? Even if so I can't really tell much of a difference, I would say 5-10% better in favour of DLSS, but still
I use both AMD and NVIDIA
@@maho8204 tbh I tested Fsr with Nvidia gpu on the 3 known resolution 1080p, 1440p, 4k
Dlss is much better more sharp also Im using a 4k 50' Tv 120hz refresh rate so I can tell the difference ..
But the key assets here is FG lets C what FSR3 could do, there's possibility Amd could reverse the table on Nvidia since they made fsr 3 open source to everyone
rt really good experience if you like playing 30 fps xD
@@homsterluder5364 that's a potato PC. i can play Wukong on high settings with RT max DLSSQ+FG with 90-120fps. :D Nvidia does not tank your FPS massively unlike Radeon.
According to the steam survey ~76% of all gamers are still using Nvidia GPUs. Why isn't it 90% for AMD, when everyone claims that they are so much better?
потому что большинство выбираю не головой ,а сердцем
Influencers and marketing swaying the people who know nothing about GPUs
AMD fanboys are a very vocal minority. Thankfully most people aren't dumb enough to fall for their lies and can see that Nvidia has the better product.
@@verde5738 The fanboy hath spoken.
Have fun overpaying for cards that become obsolete in a generation. I'm still playing every modern game with my 6700XT with zero driver issues anf with high framerates
^ Exhibit A
Lies and delusions.
RT = HYBRID RT
PT = FULL RT
Awesome video keep it up
I think bruh to be fair do another video comparison with same title games with RT on & FG on aswel it'll be very interesting TY on 4k & 14440p
how come on all test RT is OFF?? and it start with call od duty, we all know AMD has an advantage there, so unbalanced review, dont bother
Video title:
... Rasterization = RT OFF 😅
RT is overrated
@@ERIC-WRIGHT for you may be, but many gamers would like to see the wow effects of nice graphics, this is the biggest motivation to buy latest greatest graphics cards, if not just play in low graphics with your existing card
@@trexeyesonly55 Cyberpunk 2077 4K Graphic High -> Normal 100FPS+ | Ray tracing 50FPS - + | Path tracing 30FPS - + | Sorry but it only looks slightly better and it's just not worth it because it's overrated. which WoW effect?
@@ERIC-WRIGHT you buy AMD now or why you try to convince me? First you said RT is not important and now you try to convince me AMD is doing similar (which is not)
Monitor?
if your main goal is gaming, you have to be stupid to pick the 4070 ti S over the 7900xt.
Damn even my 7800xt performs better than the 4070 ti super for $320 cheaper
Eh? 7900XT is 28% faster than the 7800XT.....The 4070ti super is maybe on average 5-7% slower than a 7900XT.
So no your 7800XT is not faster.
you forgot on rays
People never consider the electricity bill… Nvidia consumes less power, you end up saving more money in the long run, plus they have the lead in software.
Nvidia has an 88% hold on the GPU market so it seems like the overwhelming majority of people aren't dumb enough to get swayed by these AMD fanboys.
@@RocketRat8YT Usually when you buy a 700$+ GPU, you want it to come with all the premium features, and currently only Nvidia gives you access to all the premium features, along with superior power efficiency, which is just the cherry on top.
I can assure you, that at the higher end on the GPU spectrum, Nvidia offers the substantially superior product.
Not to mention heating up your room and having to run your AC to cool your room down.
The RX 7900XT is like 150€ cheaper
But FSR is dogwater compared to DLSS and most future Games will use that tech
Brohh just look how much more vram using amd than Nvidia no matter amd card have 20 gb vram its still same nvida 16gb because of 20% more vram using
I dont know the cheapest 4070ti super is 838 euro and the 7900 xt is 720 euro .. no brainer
AMD using 30% more power to achieve similar fps
Crazy how AMD needs 30% more preformance for 30% less money to split sales with Nvidia.
Funny how AMD as red looks like wrong answer and Green for Nvidia looks like right answer.
Except the 4070 ti super has micro stuttering issues and bad frametimes, as you can even see in this video. Nvidia waited months to try and fix it, they released the patch and it still runs like shit.
The 7900 xt was buttery smooth.
wheres the khaled hotel
AMD=AMD=AMD
TOP
LVL UP
NVIDEA is only better in Raytracing, but AMD upgrading their FSR ...now 3.1 then later 3.2 and 3.3 and we will nearly 100% same performance at raytracing and same qualitiy.
lmao
Pure unadulterated copium.
Can you do a 21:9 3440x1440p test with rtx 4070 ti Super but for FPS games like CSGO , Apex Legends ?
Fuck Avatar that shit is biased.
nvidia:
rtx 4070
rtx 4070 super
rtx 4070 ti
rtx 4070 ti super
rtx 4070 mega
rtx 4070 ti mega
rtx 4070 ti mega super
rtx 4070 giga
rtx 4070 ti giga
rtx 4070 ti giga mega
rtx 4070 ti giga mega super
rtx 4070 ti giga mega super hyper hulky bulky mulky lucky ducky monkey money
ATI:
Radeon 7900xt
Nvidia keeps relying on dlss to make up for charging more for less performance, ill stick with amd and what ever raw rasterization i can get out of the 7900xtx i gut used for 600 dollars...
880€ FOR 70 FPS IN 1440P 😂😂😂😂😂😂
buy Amd，buy hardware， NV software
The RX 7900 XT with rays RTX does not play some games in 2k native , but for such a price I would like to play in the future
Super cool :)) 🌼😄
Пиздежь и провокация. В моих тестах всё иначе. Разбежка в 5-10 фпс в пользу 7900xt. При этом все кординально меняется при включении лучей. С лучами 15-30 фпс в пользу 4070 TiS. Радеоны, как были говном, так и остались. Не утешайте сами себя.
Amd driver issues monster straight up trash
What many people here don't understand:
The Nvidia Super does not work with new clock rates but with TENSOR CORES!
These cores are mainly made to perform with Frame Generation (DLSS3).
The results shown here are only NATIVE! So switched off.
If you let DLSS3 compete against FSR3 here, the Nvidia graphics card is ahead again and also saves a lot of power and temperature!
So AMD has by no means "won" here, as many people wrongly write.
Understand the technology!
bla bla bla
@@aliekber4180 Oh little sweet AMD Fanboy 🤭
@@bloodycorrey Sorry pal, You gotta realize one thing. People are paying for Nvidia and features NOT ALL GAMES SUPPORT. DLSS is popular but Frame gen isn't and that's what they're trying to sell you with the 40 series to compete. And even then, its only in a fair select few titles people even care about. In reality, the PC space is loaded with more indie and early access gamers than triple A which support that stuff.
So think again.
And no sweet little AMD fan boy. I'm speaking from experience of owning both for shits and giggles. When I traded a 6950 for a 3090 the only thing I gained was broadcast. When it came to FPS, the 6950 was miles ahead and far smoother gameplay and GAME DETAIL was better too, if you don't know parallax, then sit down.
They're both equal when it comes to game play any more though with 7 and 4 series both, but that frame gen crap has to go. FOR BOTH COMPANIES! It's useless and over selling.
@@FatherLamb One is ideology, about the pros and cons.
The other is how the technology behind it works.
Please differentiate.
I myself am not a fan of the Nvidia marketing and think that such a technology should be for everyone, please don't misunderstand.
4070TI Super = Super disappointment
Amd wins in power, but in raytracing nvidea
AMD is cheaper, but NVIDIA can make money for you.
nvidia for riches amd for poor
Lmaoo paying more for less. Amd is simply better value
If the pricing is the same as this video AMD isnt better
@@nickwu4384 u say amd is not better cuz ray tracing ,,, most of ppl doesnt care about rt .. ray tracing is new tech .. and going to be enough good in 2030 .. so amd for the win!!!!! amd still have time to catch up rt nvidia..!
@@nickwu4384 the 7900xt literally out performs it and it’s cheaper
@@LeCrissDeBuzzer When did I say it's only raytracing? NVIDIA has many other advantages and you are just ignorant if you... Ignore it.
So 4070 ti s better
i dont understand why this stupid tester dont use dlss and fsr we need se this
18gb vram using warzone in rx 7900xt hello wtff whatsssssssss
AMD "allocates" much more VRAM, it's not the VRAM used in real time
Others videos in others webs pages appears that 4070 TI Super is better than 7900 XT!!!
Why???
I prefers AMD, but is only a question.
Rasterization -> 7900 XT
Ray Tracing -> 4070 Ti S
watch hardware unboxed, gamers nexus or vex's reviews they go in depth and shows most of the time its losing to the 7900 xt
@@dabidflor9563 It must hurt your heart to see that AMD is really this good. Go buy it yourself and see for your yourself. My 7800XT a bought just one month ago performs way better than what you see depicted by content creators. I was so impressed with the rasterization performance of the 7800XT that I bought a 7900XT too which arrives today UPS. AMD has now caught up to and surpasses Nvidia DLSS with their FSR 3 in UE5 as well. Saw the video just yesterday where FSR 3 was clearly superior to DLSS in quality mode. NVidia still had the slightly better image in performance mode however. Go see for yourself and stop allow Nvida to scam you. That is what Nvidia has become in their greed. They are now forced to released these Super cards with more RAM because AMD gives you more RAM for longevity. Nvida knew all along that the RAM they were giving you would not be enough for very long. They knew what games were in the works and would be needing more RAM before the public but over and over chose to release their cards with the paltry RAM anyway. That is the very definition of a scam. AMD has also made great gains in their RT performance. If I see you're greedy I'll never buy from you again.
What many people here don't understand:
The Nvidia Super does not work with new clock rates but with TENSOR CORES!
These cores are mainly made to perform with Frame Generation (DLSS3).
The results shown here are only NATIVE! So switched off.
If you let DLSS3 compete against FSR3 here, the Nvidia graphics card is ahead again and also saves a lot of power and temperature!
So AMD has by no means "won" here, as many people wrongly write.
Understand the technology!