CRITIQUE of TRUTH in Nietzsche and Foucault

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 18 сен 2024
  • Everyone talks about TRUTH, but do we know the history of truth?
    What do you mean by TRUTH? Please comment below the video so I can enter into a conversation with you.
    In this video I discuss the critique of truth in Nietzsche and Foucault. This is an Immersion experience in Nietzsche and Foucault via videos. Comment and ask here on RUclips, and in the next videos I will answer your questions and comments, and bring more questions. Subscribe to the channel to be notified of upcoming videos.
    Also follow us on Facebook: / critiquenietzschefoucault
    Podcasts:
    Soundcloud: / rodrigo-guim-684766904
    Podcasts on Deezer, Spotify, Apple Podcasts
    Instagram: / critiquenietzschefoucault
    This channel is part of the project Immersion in Nietzsche and Foucault, developed by Rodrigo Guim and involves discussion processes and group work, now also this channel. If interested in being part of some in-person or online immersion you can join the Facebook group to stay informed about events: / nietzschefoucault
    TEXTS this video was based on:
    NIETZSCHE´S CRITIQUE OF TRUTH by Ken Gemes: www.jstor.org/...
    TRUTH AND MORALITY, by Rodrigo Guim: www.academia.e...

Комментарии • 30

  • @ericcrawford9827
    @ericcrawford9827 2 года назад

    Truh as an abstract concept is something I never thought about. I'm learning, but maybe not, everything could be a lie

  • @linagundam
    @linagundam 4 года назад

    First time watching your videos. It's just awesome the way to expose those ideas of truth here. Thank you very much!

    • @jceter
      @jceter 10 месяцев назад

      He seems to be a great teacher

  • @sumantsaurav8859
    @sumantsaurav8859 5 лет назад

    Great Lecture👍

  • @Badabing95
    @Badabing95 4 года назад +1

    Hi, I have an assessment task for uni about these two. The question is as follows
    In 2000 words,
    Compare and contrast Friedrich Nietzsche's genealogy of morality with Michel Foucault's views on power. To what extent does Nietzsche provide the template for Foucault's own critique of power, and to what extent is his position a discourse of the type Foucault characterises as racist
    Do you have any tips for me?

  • @jceter
    @jceter 10 месяцев назад

    What aI get is that truth, as a niversal sturcture does exist onlly in its pure form, which is, devoid of any thing but just the concept of it. Any atent to turth threfore, is a fabrication gear to specific means and it may stand a time period.

  • @michaelfrank2664
    @michaelfrank2664 3 года назад +2

    More videos in English please.

  • @mark4asp
    @mark4asp Год назад

    "CRITIQUE of TRUTH"

  • @Lars3953
    @Lars3953 4 года назад

    I think he is lying

    • @criticanietzschefoucault
      @criticanietzschefoucault  4 года назад

      Who is lying? How?

    • @Lars3953
      @Lars3953 4 года назад

      @@criticanietzschefoucault If there is no truth, we are all liars

    • @criticanietzschefoucault
      @criticanietzschefoucault  4 года назад

      @@Lars3953 it is not that there is no truth, but that there is no final truth. There are truth games. There is no way not to produce truth, but truth cannot but produce lies as well, so in some sense yes we are all liers, but not in a moral sense. Truth cannot exist without lies, errors, falsity. There is no purity in truth.

    • @Lars3953
      @Lars3953 4 года назад

      @@criticanietzschefoucault I think I understand what you mean (and I didn't mean "lying" in a moral sense).
      You (and Foucault and Nietzsche) may be right, but isn't it self-refuting to make the claim; "Nothing is true"? I mean, then the claim must be false as well? Or ... does the very idea of lie/false disappear when truth/right disappears.
      well, now I am dizzy and confused ...

    • @criticanietzschefoucault
      @criticanietzschefoucault  4 года назад

      @@Lars3953 See that I never claimed (nor does Nietzsche or Foucault) that "nothing is true". It is more a question of looking at how truths are produced in specific contexts, with specific aims (conscious or not) and with multiple effects (that extrapolate their intentional effects).