Why Modi Govt’s privatisation wave is a welcome reform & why BPCL is such a big deal | ep 322

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 20 ноя 2019
  • #CutTheClutter #CTC
    Finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman announced the strategic sale of 5 major PSUs, especially BPCL & a string of other welcome reforms to counter the economic slide. In episode 322 of Cut The Clutter, Shekhar Gupta explains the ‘how, why and what next’ of these major economic reforms by the Narendra Modi government. And, does it matter if a cricket ball is red, white or pink if it brings people to watch Tests.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Connect with ThePrint
    » Subscribe to ThePrint : bit.ly/SubscribeToThePrint
    » Like us on Facebook: / theprintindia
    » Tweet us on Twitter: / theprintindia
    » Follow us on Instagram: / theprintindia
    » Find us on LinkedIn : / theprint
    » Subscribe to ThePrint on Telegram: t.me/ThePrintIndia

Комментарии • 1,3 тыс.

  • @ThePrintIndia
    @ThePrintIndia  3 года назад +23

    Good journalism needs support from smart people like you. Subscribe to ThePrint here: theprint.in/subscribe/

    • @unknownentity2112
      @unknownentity2112 3 года назад +1

      Will do but you guys just coming out and stating that a profit making public company that is the second largest refiner of the satate being sold is a good deal.
      Please be considerate enough so as to put forth the reasoning as to why you think so.
      A guy coming out stating something is valid and not providing any reasoning as to why doesn't make what's being done any more credible.

    • @hasbath79
      @hasbath79 3 года назад

      Good Journalism? Where Sir ? Please provide links i will definitely help.

    • @siddheshdubey
      @siddheshdubey 3 года назад

      You still need to learn journalism in your school.

  • @mukul2500
    @mukul2500 4 года назад +362

    While on the one hand Rajdeep,asks everyone to talk about economy, barring himself. We have Gupta ji, leading by the example. Jio Gupta ji Jio.

  • @prashanttiwari5686
    @prashanttiwari5686 4 года назад +167

    Are our netas so professional that they can't even keep track of acts being abolished😂😂

    • @RaviKumar-fc5qe
      @RaviKumar-fc5qe 4 года назад +1

      Is that even a question 😁

    • @mallianumula
      @mallianumula 4 года назад +3

      Thats y its locksabha 😀

    • @visweshsrinivasan1
      @visweshsrinivasan1 4 года назад +1

      @@mallianumula It's become "lol" sabha now.

    • @abhijitguha494
      @abhijitguha494 3 года назад

      netas only interested to make snide remarks and wisecracks against each other to get applause from their respective chamchas. They invest their time to conjure up smartass replies.

  • @rupeshtashildar
    @rupeshtashildar 3 года назад +22

    Everything private in this country is top class, everything controlled by government is third class.

    • @khitishmana4803
      @khitishmana4803 2 года назад +1

      Privet company job se lath mark nikale gi tab pata chalaega
      Sab sale madarchod hai .....Jo privet ki baat krtahai

    • @in-human1698
      @in-human1698 2 года назад +4

      @@khitishmana4803 kam nahi karoge ya karna hi nehi ata toh lath marke hi bahar karega

    • @piyushdevnath293
      @piyushdevnath293 2 года назад +2

      @@in-human1698 ji haa yehi toh problem hai logo ko 😂😂 kaam nhi karegi toh nikalenge hi kyu sarkar ko faltu ka paisa kyu dena

    • @RP-kr9ql
      @RP-kr9ql 2 года назад +1

      @@piyushdevnath293 sahi mai yarr, sare log paagal ho jaate hai govt jobs k naam par. Govt jobs are only famous cause they are so easy to do( just pass the work to other employees).
      kaam kuch na kro bass job benefits aur job security mil jaye

    • @sushmasandanshiv1657
      @sushmasandanshiv1657 2 года назад

      We should think if privatization will really help or not... as by privatisation main goal will be to gain profit which will only benefit employees and all peoples we won't be able to protest about bad service as it won't be in government hand.... and profit from these privatized companies will be beneficial for other countries instead of our as to gain profit companies share holders can be non indians too....so it is not confirmed if privatization will be beneficial to us...by doing it so even prices will be increased

  • @wishphysics
    @wishphysics 4 года назад +153

    This is true journalism , thanks Gupta g .left librals will curse modi and right media will praise modi without Caring what he is doing.But Gupta g talks on merit.

    • @ThePrintIndia
      @ThePrintIndia  4 года назад +27

      Thank you very much, Vishal. We try our best...pls keep track and writing in...SG

    • @anotheridiotoninternet6635
      @anotheridiotoninternet6635 4 года назад +16

      Hope..he continues to do It ..my only fear is that he might turn back his liberal ideas in time of election rather than centreist and unbiased. Because our country at this stage desparately need unbiased journalist.Hope he continues doing so.

    • @manansharma4178
      @manansharma4178 4 года назад +2

      News Forum Han hum gali dete hain jab vo Randi-TV ka propoganda chlate hain. Aab jab vo unbised hain to hum aachai bhi karte hain.

    • @baggamsuresh7977
      @baggamsuresh7977 4 года назад

      But the attempts of privatisation may lead to anger from youth of the country. Millions of youth are toiling a lot in order to secure a government job like banks.There is a cut throat competition .

    • @amantiwari4987
      @amantiwari4987 3 года назад +4

      @@baggamsuresh7977 let them cry bjp will still win in 2024

  • @VSSushant
    @VSSushant 4 года назад +196

    If they had privatized early we would have a flourishing defense and electronic sector!!

    • @ignashi7plays401
      @ignashi7plays401 4 года назад +9

      Yes look at China. China please adopt me😭

    • @ignashi7plays401
      @ignashi7plays401 4 года назад +28

      @Just Dab fk democracy. Illiterates ke liye democracy ka koi Matlab nhi. Unke liye bas 2 time ki roti aur 10 bacche chahiye majdoori ke liye. Ya to sabko padhao ya phir democracy ghatiya hai

    • @shenanigans4177
      @shenanigans4177 4 года назад +22

      @@ignashi7plays401 Yes democracy is flawed and the more liberal the world gets, it's harder for democracies to reform. China was lucky enough to have patriotic leaders like Mao, Deng Xiaoping, Xi jinping etc. Give the same power to any Indian politician, they will ruin it for sure. Perhaps you didn't know but china stands where it is because of these men and jinping did many reforms to curb corruption in communist China. But china is china and india is india, what worked for the Chinese isn't necessarily gonna work for us too. Better participate in democracy and build the nation that way.

    • @chetanpandore
      @chetanpandore 4 года назад +3

      @@ignashi7plays401 you are educated illiterate.

    • @rahul19ify
      @rahul19ify 4 года назад +5

      @@shenanigans4177 You can't even live 7 days in China under chinese govt. There are innumerable restrictions in China on citizen. Chinese govt keep close watch on its citizens.

  • @user-rf9kb3uq9i
    @user-rf9kb3uq9i 4 года назад +232

    I always knew that the Gandhi's are largely responsible for the state that we find ourselves in , but man finding out the specifics only makes it worse, am not a huge fan of the current government but I hope that Gandhi's never come back to power again, the thought alone scares me

    • @rahulray9983
      @rahulray9983 4 года назад +63

      During the 70s and 80s when our neighborhood of Asean countries were busy developing and strengthening their economies, the Congress Party was busy worshiping Soviet Socialism

    • @vedakumar9759
      @vedakumar9759 4 года назад +4

      My thoughts too

    • @ajayprabhu9631
      @ajayprabhu9631 4 года назад +11

      1947-1991 and 1991-2019... Difference is for us to see. 2004-2014 without sonia at the helm of a so called National Advisory council would have actually made a stellar difference

    • @tubelz
      @tubelz 4 года назад +14

      @@rahulray9983 BJP is still a socialist party. Out of the last 21 years, 11 were BJP years. They could have achieved a lot of reforms. India needs a new party like Swarna Bharat. They have classical liberals like Sanjeev Sabhlok who understand both freedom and economic growth go together.

    • @Tanmayl11
      @Tanmayl11 4 года назад +20

      @@tubelz they didn't have absolute majorities needed to brutally push through. Even during Modi's first term he tried to fast track reforms but congress played dirty politics of "suit boot ki sarkar" so they had to slow because they were unsure if they will ever get the 2014 numbers.

  • @GagandeepSingh-ns8sx
    @GagandeepSingh-ns8sx 4 года назад +465

    All psu's should be privatised then only real economic boom will take place.. Take example of IT sector no psu yet biggest economic powerhouse of our country..

    • @ThePrintIndia
      @ThePrintIndia  4 года назад +131

      You are very right. All, barring a few necessary exceptions: SBI and ONGC, for example. India’s electronics hardware sector was unfortunately confined to the public sector for too long. And by the time we opened up, we were already totally import dependent and we still are...it was an atrocity of protectionist years...SG

    • @NoneOfTheAbove123
      @NoneOfTheAbove123 4 года назад +4

      @@ThePrintIndia But I think to mobilise strategic assets( in case if we have to create strategic oil reserves) nationalised corporations would come in handy. Same goes for the plan to revitalize BSNL-MTNL.

    • @GagandeepSingh-ns8sx
      @GagandeepSingh-ns8sx 4 года назад +39

      @@NoneOfTheAbove123 This BSNL-MTNL company will again suffer huge losses becaz it cannot compete with Jio. Government should have sold it off when they had opportunity to do so..

    • @vinaynayak5635
      @vinaynayak5635 4 года назад +9

      Why don’t they provide 4G capability to Mtnl-bsnl ? In a couple of years, that may fetch a much bigger price for them

    • @GagandeepSingh-ns8sx
      @GagandeepSingh-ns8sx 4 года назад +30

      @@vinaynayak5635 see government has very poor record of doing business they are I think allergic to profit earned these companies..😂😂

  • @bharatpandit4796
    @bharatpandit4796 4 года назад +116

    Indira Ghandhi also inserted ‘secular’ in the Preamble of the Constitution: why is SG shy of saying that.

    • @AarshParashar
      @AarshParashar 4 года назад +6

      hmm Yes.

    • @EvergreenConsultancy
      @EvergreenConsultancy 4 года назад +9

      And Integrity also, that's why BJP is shy of saying that 😝

    • @siddharthmane1506
      @siddharthmane1506 4 года назад +24

      @@EvergreenConsultancy bjp is not shy bjp will remove secularism and socialism

    • @EvergreenConsultancy
      @EvergreenConsultancy 4 года назад +5

      @@siddharthmane1506 I'm sure, as Integrity has long been removed..

    • @bhagyasinghgurjar9803
      @bhagyasinghgurjar9803 4 года назад +8

      Socialist should be removed not secular
      But it is not possible to ammend basic structure of the Constitution led down in landmark keshvananda bharti case of 1973

  • @anantsaini
    @anantsaini 4 года назад +13

    I myself being a full supporter of Privatisation fully support and liked this PRINT Video. Thanks for putting it out Gupta Ji.

    • @cani5761
      @cani5761 3 года назад +2

      privatization is the future too much people in india we cant loop that money

  • @sonalsharma510
    @sonalsharma510 4 года назад +168

    Do a video on the feasibility of subsidised education in India!

    • @ThePrintIndia
      @ThePrintIndia  4 года назад +80

      It’s an excellent idea. It will need some research. I promise to come back with this soon enough. Thank you very much for writing in...SG

    • @alokranjan6616
      @alokranjan6616 4 года назад +2

      @@ThePrintIndia Ahh so you do read our comments.

    • @pardeeptandon6730
      @pardeeptandon6730 4 года назад +5

      Sonal Sharma : Education all over the world is subsided . In fact there is no country in the world were education is not subsidised. Further in China it is FREE. No wonder today an average Chinese has become 4 times richer then an Indian in the last 40 years.

    • @pardeeptandon6730
      @pardeeptandon6730 4 года назад +2

      ThePrint : Please also try to find out how education is spread / dispersed in China in last 40 years and what were the effects of it on its people / economy

    • @anupvkale1
      @anupvkale1 4 года назад +2

      Absolutely, taxpayers deserve to know how much they are sponsoring and what's the outcome.

  • @rahuldhar869
    @rahuldhar869 4 года назад +81

    PLEASE add the link in the description of the reference articles that are written by The Print reporters.

    • @ThePrintIndia
      @ThePrintIndia  4 года назад +38

      That’s an excellent idea. Will start doing so from tomorrow. Thanks, Rahul...SG

    • @lalitspam5036
      @lalitspam5036 4 года назад +1

      @@ThePrintIndia can you do this for the old CTC also..

    • @raghavendrag8036
      @raghavendrag8036 4 года назад +1

      @@ThePrintIndia u can edit the description of this video and update it now itself

    • @N12SR48SLC
      @N12SR48SLC 4 года назад

      @@ThePrintIndia I want to suggest you something more, Shekhar Gupta always says share it with your family memebers or ask them to subscribe this channel. As a matter of fact, they don't understand English quite a much, but I can suggest you if you bring-in subtitles in english or likewise Quint-hindi separate channel for Hindi audience or you can use this same channel for posting same content in hindi as he does for National Interest for hindi audience trust me it'll definitely accelerate, if he has no time to reshoot 20-30 min. long video you can dubb it in hindi(can't guarantee how deeper it's impact would be). But you need to bring innovations to reach out larger chunk of audience.

    • @MrSolanx
      @MrSolanx 4 года назад +1

      @@N12SR48SLC Absolutely.... right bro

  • @rajendrahegade
    @rajendrahegade 4 года назад +85

    Not just the word 'social' but also the word 'secular' was added during emergency "P

    • @ajayprabhu9631
      @ajayprabhu9631 4 года назад +11

      Good one. But may be he didn't mention it because he was stressing on the "socialist" mindset which many in the government still has and has done no good to the Indian state affairs

    • @tushar4evr776
      @tushar4evr776 4 года назад +4

      But being secular isn't bad..

    • @ajayprabhu9631
      @ajayprabhu9631 4 года назад +22

      @@tushar4evr776 Secularism in it's true sense is not bad. But where on earth are we seeing it in it's true nature?Breaking Communal Harmony in the name of secularism is what I often see from the left (largest culprit), right and centre. I am happy with communal harmony and peace in the society. A word secular in the preamble of the constitution will not make any difference to me ,personally

    • @rajendrahegade
      @rajendrahegade 4 года назад +1

      @@ajayprabhu9631 true. Very convenient though 😉

    • @Abhi-tb5ww
      @Abhi-tb5ww 4 года назад +1

      Constitution padho jak article 25-28 the constitution was secular much before the word secular was added...don't talk out of your ass do your research.

  • @hannanhub1717
    @hannanhub1717 4 года назад +8

    Nationalisation of Banks saved India from a larger disaster in 2008 financial crises.... otherwise we would have suffered even more

  • @chandan4156
    @chandan4156 4 года назад +19

    With electric transportation in future, this is the right time to get rid of govt oil companies

    • @hritikjuyal5484
      @hritikjuyal5484 4 года назад +2

      It's not that easy. Oil will stay for 2-3 decades.

    • @smartjaggu
      @smartjaggu 4 года назад +2

      its common for human beings to dream but it has become absoulte normal for to keep dreaming, if usa say electric transportation, indians also say electric transportation lol

    • @sivasriram7588
      @sivasriram7588 4 года назад

      South Ka Chandan oil is everything now brother in a house almost 50% of our goods are manufactured by using oil so you can’t ignore oil atleast until 2040

    • @sivasriram7588
      @sivasriram7588 4 года назад

      exams corner lol don’t mix countries bro it’s about capitalism and science that Indians are following now USA

  • @GK_US
    @GK_US 4 года назад +36

    5 dislikes for a video of 22 minutes within 19 minutes indicates some guys are disliking the video even before seeing it..

    • @prashanttiwari5686
      @prashanttiwari5686 4 года назад +4

      The BJP IT cell...poor guys don't even know that they are actually being praised in this video😂

    • @prashanttiwari5686
      @prashanttiwari5686 4 года назад

      @@karthika560 possible 😂

  • @VSSushant
    @VSSushant 4 года назад +42

    Best decision by govt!!!... Privatize every other PSU and improve efficiency!!

    • @joysen83
      @joysen83 4 года назад +3

      I think selling PSU like BPCL (highly profit making organization) is a mistake. State asset cannot be sold simply specially if they are making profit.
      PSU are also big source of job opportunity in india.
      Less PSU means less govt. Job. More job insecurity.
      Private sector jobs are not reliable.
      Modi govt should not do the mistake of privatisation of PSU.

    • @VSSushant
      @VSSushant 4 года назад +10

      @@joysen83 It makes profit but it is no where as efficient as Reliance or Total. Regarding Jobs, Yes they won't be as secure, There is no job in the world that is secure. Running huge organization with inefficiency makes it a liability and not asset. Also Govt job is not to run business but to make policies, law and facilitate these business. Congress had made loss making Hindustan zinc a private entity, was bought and run by Vedanta. Its dividend in following years made more money to the govt than it ever did under govt control. And do you think Fin ministry won't like money?

    • @VSSushant
      @VSSushant 4 года назад +4

      @@joysen83 Also, If govt employees had worked or its management had efficiently worked, we would not have had 30 years delay in Tejas LCA. Also, remember we dont have supply chain industries around array of industries. Why we have nice IT industry or Auto industry? ...simply coz they are run privately and if they dont perform ...They get punished mercilessly in stock market!!.... Governments can evade ....These private industries can't !!

    • @karthikarvindcs
      @karthikarvindcs 4 года назад +1

      @@joysen83 sad that still we have people like you who want governemt jobs

    • @joysen83
      @joysen83 4 года назад +2

      Well i am working in a big private congrolamate (it's a ethical organization) , but all private organization are not ethical, see jet Airways, sahara Punj Lloyd , lanco ,videocon etc. All are bankrupt, so u want to follow such companies.
      Reliance is not a very ethical comapny like Tata. Reliace is also selling it's oil business to Aramco.
      I am working in private sector if any of u were working in private sector then u would have understand what it means job insecurity. Ur family depends on u but private sector job security will lead u more unemployment. What will u do if u loose ur job.
      It's seems from all of ur comments none of u r working in private sector otherwise so no one noes what is job insecurity.

  • @ManojDas
    @ManojDas 4 года назад +57

    Correction: Numaligarh Refinery is in Golaghat District, not Goalpara. And it's out also because of Assam Accord.

    • @ThePrintIndia
      @ThePrintIndia  4 года назад +36

      You are right. And I made an error, of course. Thank you for pointing out. I said the eastern part of Assam alright but said Goalpara instead of Golaghat. We will soon put in a correction. Thanks ...SG

    • @ManojDas
      @ManojDas 4 года назад +3

      @@ThePrintIndia It's okay. Actually Goalpara is my hometown, so I know very well that NRL is not situated there! :D

    • @ajayprabhu9631
      @ajayprabhu9631 4 года назад

      @@ManojDas Thanks for the info.

    • @jaiminibhattacharyya815
      @jaiminibhattacharyya815 4 года назад +1

      Also, Numaligarh (Golaghat district) is not bordering Bangladesh

    • @chandra11116
      @chandra11116 4 года назад +2

      @@ThePrintIndia Wish I could get a personal reply by SG... I will frame it !!!

  • @nayyuuuuuuiu853
    @nayyuuuuuuiu853 4 года назад +30

    Mr.gupta you are great but that Zainab Sikander is a disgrace to the print ...please remove her

  • @SAURABHKUMAR-og3rp
    @SAURABHKUMAR-og3rp 4 года назад +10

    Gupta ji, The most important challenge in rapid industrialization in India is land acquisition problem and high cost of capital... Please do a CTC on how to solve these vexing problem...

  • @dhozah11
    @dhozah11 4 года назад +35

    Numaligarh Refinary is not in Goalpara district..it is in Golaghat district...

    • @ThePrintIndia
      @ThePrintIndia  4 года назад +31

      You are right. I made a mistake. I speak without a script or a teleprompter and sometimes slip-up. It should’ve been Golaghat, not Goalpara. Apologies. We are putting a correction.

    • @_vs04
      @_vs04 4 года назад +2

      @@ThePrintIndia ,Sir please make video on chinese encroachment in arunachal pradesh

    • @abhijitguha494
      @abhijitguha494 3 года назад

      @@ThePrintIndia bravo !!!

  • @timepass-se9nw
    @timepass-se9nw 4 года назад +66

    Look at the mess Congress has left behind. Mind boggling. and ppl still vote for Congress

    • @manavsalvi4165
      @manavsalvi4165 4 года назад +4

      @Save Climate lol delusional

    • @timepass-se9nw
      @timepass-se9nw 4 года назад +4

      @Save Climate Congress -> "self respected party" 😂, Read up on friendship between Murli Deora (petroleum minister in UPA) & Mukesh Ambani

  • @rahulray9983
    @rahulray9983 4 года назад +47

    Make video about Chinese investment into Indian tech companies

  • @vogetiakhil4451
    @vogetiakhil4451 4 года назад +2

    That's so much research. To my knowledge no paper mentioned what the govt did in 2016 while removing obsolete laws. Clever move. The intro to the topic, the analysis, spot on. Cut the clutter is refreshing. Thanks. Keep making more.

  • @Roushan12345
    @Roushan12345 4 года назад +10

    Correction:: Numaligarh refinery is in Golaghat district not in Goalpara. Also Goalpara is at the west of Guwahati not in east.

  • @23367388
    @23367388 4 года назад +26

    muncipal corporations across nation should be privatize as well.

    • @VSSushant
      @VSSushant 4 года назад +3

      Well watch Kannada movie called 'Super'. Where the lead privatizes each and every footpath to citizens, corporate etc. And instantly private citizen owning them start to take care, maintaining it etc etc ... LOL

    • @pranavkamath
      @pranavkamath 4 года назад +1

      @@VSSushant Should be done across the country.

  • @lijothomas465
    @lijothomas465 4 года назад +186

    Atleast reservation will be gone. Decisions will be taken quickly. The craze for government jobs will come to an end.

    • @thelastofsamurai9249
      @thelastofsamurai9249 4 года назад +28

      Then they will implement reservation in private sector...level of our politics is very low bro

    • @lijothomas465
      @lijothomas465 4 года назад +37

      @@thelastofsamurai9249 Unlikely. RSS do not support it , therefore BJP will not implement it.

    • @thelastofsamurai9249
      @thelastofsamurai9249 4 года назад +13

      @@lijothomas465 bro bjp has changed its caste arithmetic..now obc are the main runners in the party... RSS doesn't have that grip during modi reign...

    • @lijothomas465
      @lijothomas465 4 года назад +1

      @@thelastofsamurai9249 Hmm. We have to see.

    • @thelastofsamurai9249
      @thelastofsamurai9249 4 года назад

      @NIGHT WING yeah bro

  • @sakshamgoel7362
    @sakshamgoel7362 4 года назад +31

    Sir,
    I want to respectfully point out an error. Emergency was declared on 26 June, 1975 and not in May 1975.

    • @aagantuk7370
      @aagantuk7370 4 года назад +1

      Kitna respect ❤️

    • @ThePrintIndia
      @ThePrintIndia  4 года назад +32

      Point taken. I made an error and stand corrected. ...SG

  • @anupvkale1
    @anupvkale1 4 года назад +3

    Thank you Mr Gupta, definitely a welcome move by the government. Let the government focus on governing and the businesses do the business.

  • @deepakgoyal483
    @deepakgoyal483 4 года назад +34

    1971 se sarkari company, sarkari naukri chal raha hai, kya ukhad liya tabse, konsi garrebi mit gayi?? Bc yr sarkari naukri ne Indian youth and Indian hidden talent ko samne hi nahi ane diya 👎👎

    • @rightlibertarian8355
      @rightlibertarian8355 3 года назад +5

      Exactly aur ye mentality aaj bhi hai.

    • @sailing_sparrow3451
      @sailing_sparrow3451 3 года назад +4

      Logon k mann me bss gya hai... Sarkari job krlo kaam ni krna pdega... Ghar baithe bhi paise milte hen...

  • @paichethan
    @paichethan 4 года назад +5

    I want lecturer and professors of university to be made temporary and performance based. "Ifou don't publish / teach well then go home " policy.

    • @imanshumpert7129
      @imanshumpert7129 4 года назад

      Keep in mind that too many variables ruin the equation. Who would judge the teachers and at what levels ? How would you make this process transparent ? The professional teachers would demand higher salaries and would hence, be more than able to bribe whoever is at the evaluating position. Students are not a reliant form of feedback/evaluation mechanism. Also, what would be the tenure ? 1 semester (too short) or 1 year (enough to ruin a batch).

  • @vishnuvs9631
    @vishnuvs9631 4 года назад +3

    Love and huge respect from Kerala... Your way of presentation and "decluttering" is just owsome... Thanks to my mentor from whom I got info about this program..

  • @apurvabhide2860
    @apurvabhide2860 4 года назад +8

    Strange to see the Print praising the Modi Government

  • @vishwapriyagautam8227
    @vishwapriyagautam8227 4 года назад +13

    I didn't know that Gupta jee is such a wonderful unbiased observer.

    • @monjir8707
      @monjir8707 4 года назад +3

      He isn't
      But in this he is somewhat unbiased

    • @vishwapriyagautam8227
      @vishwapriyagautam8227 4 года назад +1

      @@monjir8707 :absolutely man...It was sarcastic. But from last 15 days he has been not been in it's true anti govt. color.

  • @RanveerSingh-xf5uk
    @RanveerSingh-xf5uk 4 года назад +7

    Guys, what's the labour bill Mr. Shekhar is talking about towards the end? Can someone bring me up to date, thanks!

    • @ThePrintIndia
      @ThePrintIndia  4 года назад +11

      There is a new Industrial Relations Code Bill that the cabinet approved alongside the PSU sales. I think it will be placed in parliament in a day or two. We will then talk about it in detail. I have great reformist expectations from it...SG

    • @RanveerSingh-xf5uk
      @RanveerSingh-xf5uk 4 года назад

      @@ThePrintIndia Thank you sir, For explaining this to me!, Absolutely love your journalism!

  • @vinaynayak5635
    @vinaynayak5635 4 года назад +1

    Excellent treatise Sir, on the PSU sale; also enjoyed your treatise on the pink ball controversy. One of your greatest strengths is your ability to call out hypocrisy, apart from clutter - in politicians & sportsmen alike.

  • @hinduatma
    @hinduatma 4 года назад +23

    Please declutter jnu funding and leftist inside jnu

    • @vikasjmehta
      @vikasjmehta 4 года назад +1

      I am also curious as to what is going on inside this campus y is it elite and at the same time always in the bad news

  • @nikunjpatel4304
    @nikunjpatel4304 4 года назад +11

    Man after day's hoch-poch and nonsense sensational style pseudo-journalish, Mr. gupta's cut the clutter is just a fresh breeze to lookout for whats important for the day. Kudos Mr. Gupta and i hope your Segment never stops.

    • @ThePrintIndia
      @ThePrintIndia  4 года назад +4

      Thank you very much, Nikunj...SG

    • @nikunjpatel4304
      @nikunjpatel4304 4 года назад

      @@ThePrintIndia keep continuing sir, you're indeed an inspiration.

  • @kartheekj1976
    @kartheekj1976 4 года назад +49

    Can you do a video on andhra Pradesh and its capital!!

    • @sivachandan7089
      @sivachandan7089 4 года назад +27

      Bro I know ur pain as a fellow andhra guy...people dug their graves by voting the freebie fool

    • @samarjk3077
      @samarjk3077 4 года назад +9

      Reddy has gone crazy

    • @samarjk3077
      @samarjk3077 4 года назад +9

      I dont understand how we choose these useless politicians.shame on us

    • @ramraghuwanshi2562
      @ramraghuwanshi2562 4 года назад +6

      Jagan is arrogant he may get angry with him if he makes video...

    • @samarjk3077
      @samarjk3077 4 года назад +2

      @prakash n he gonna sell temple

  • @sahayapurv
    @sahayapurv 4 года назад +34

    Why you miss the addition of the word "Secular" in our preamble. So many things happen wrongfully at the name of this word.

    • @KavateJayesh
      @KavateJayesh 4 года назад +3

      Yes. But that doesn't change our ideology right. Some people exploit it yes, but it is only possible since most ppl don't understand its meaning well. I say it's still one of the most important part of our preamble.

    • @sahayapurv
      @sahayapurv 4 года назад +8

      @@KavateJayesh Exactly, we don't understand its meaning. It should be a political tool to sepate Government and religion. Unfortunately we make it as a burden for the government to appease minorities and displease majority because majority is always wrong according to some left libtards.

    • @KavateJayesh
      @KavateJayesh 4 года назад +1

      @@sahayapurv what kind of a solution is this that if we don't understand something get rid of it . Yes we don't want biases. But what u are suggesting will create a system that follows only your bias. No one would ask the minorities then. System shudnt be biased to minorities nor majorities. I don't believe in the tags of left and right so I won't even scratch there.

    • @rachnapandey5604
      @rachnapandey5604 4 года назад +3

      Secularism is a integral philosophy of Bharat and it's constitution. We should not allow any party to misuse the term.

    • @sahayapurv
      @sahayapurv 4 года назад

      @@rachnapandey5604 Then why our forefather did not add the word in the Constitution at first. They believed that it will be a political tool to divide between the religion, which is predicted spot on. We are a pluralistic diverse society and this "secular" word is foreign to us as it seems irrelevant. History tells us that the politics can never be completely out of religion and therefore, this word of secular will always play a divisive role in our society.

  • @vinody
    @vinody 4 года назад +6

    Socialist AND secular were inserted into the preamble. Why didn't you mention that?

    • @ThePrintIndia
      @ThePrintIndia  4 года назад +5

      I have mentioned it in the past. I have also quoted from constituent assembly debates to show how Ambedkar had resisted demands to put both description in the preamble...in today’s context, only ‘socialist’ was relevant....thanks for writing in...SG

    • @ihithasrinivasan4568
      @ihithasrinivasan4568 4 года назад +2

      @A k In my opinion it was still unconstitutional. 👍

  • @sounakroy1079
    @sounakroy1079 4 года назад +4

    Love that last touch of cricket after all the news,data about privatisation of state owned companies

  • @KM-ff2gm
    @KM-ff2gm 4 года назад

    The Print is probably my biggest source of news. It is through and I enjoy how Shekharji talks about his own experiences as journalist in past years. Kudos!

  • @neev091
    @neev091 4 года назад +4

    Thank you Shekhar Gupta for mentioning about my town Digboi and how the name came into being.

  • @shivanisharma4855
    @shivanisharma4855 4 года назад +6

    I hope all the sale occurs in transparency. Herald and all those scares me. Totally my opinion 😊

  • @A_for_AML
    @A_for_AML 4 года назад +11

    Shame on congress
    Still in Coma

  • @shikharkr
    @shikharkr 4 года назад +5

    With this cut the clutter I am finally subscribing you !

  • @bidyutbikashsaikia1140
    @bidyutbikashsaikia1140 4 года назад +4

    Numaligarh is in Golaghat district, deep inside assam. Established according to Assam Accord. It's a emotional issues in Assam. 855 people died for the movement which settled with Assam Accord

    • @ThePrintIndia
      @ThePrintIndia  4 года назад +1

      Yes, deep in the east. I got that right, but slipped up in saying Goalpara instead of Golaghat...thanks for pointing out..SG

  • @param1790
    @param1790 4 года назад +11

    Digboi comes from English expression “Dig boy”. Just a tidbit.

  • @ThusSawSuhash
    @ThusSawSuhash 4 года назад +3

    Along with the word socialist, Ms Gandhi also inserted 'unity' and 'integrity' in preamble of Indian Constitution

  • @vibhavagarwalla8718
    @vibhavagarwalla8718 4 года назад +1

    Container Corp is a ghastly monopoly. They charge more money to move containers from NCR to Navashiva than the entire sea freight from Navashiva to Los Angeles. This one thing alone is hurting auto guys in NCR competing with Chinese manufacturers when it comes to the global export market.

  • @udayrathod3786
    @udayrathod3786 4 года назад +25

    Schrödinger's cat disagrees with you, or does it?

  • @vijayaditya2003
    @vijayaditya2003 4 года назад +7

    He explained how it is done. But he didn’t explained why govt is selling?! Is it losses?!

    • @amitmishra-ob8vf
      @amitmishra-ob8vf 4 года назад +6

      No they are all in profit...but inefficient . Govt Will get hefty amount from taxation on selling, efficiency will be improved, lump sum amount in Billions of dollars for selling stake immediately which will help in funding fiscal deficit...
      Also if its runs into losses later then the private owner Will bear it and not the govt...
      Least but not the last...if govt doesn't sell it now when it is in profit,then it won't be able to sell when it runs into losses..like in the case of Air India, BSNL,MTNL,etc..and sad part is they still cost govt 90,000 crore to 1.5lakh crore RS as operational cost... while they benefit no one

  • @thatwittyboy
    @thatwittyboy 4 года назад +4

    Great work sir... Not right nor left only true journalism.

  • @jainharish7480
    @jainharish7480 4 года назад

    SIR,brilliant,concise and in simple words,you have really,”de-cluttered”this slippery oil issue.
    Thank you.

  • @shantanukhule4
    @shantanukhule4 4 года назад +2

    It's now daily routine of my to watch cut the clutter.Keep it up shekhar ji and the print.

  • @sajeev22185
    @sajeev22185 4 года назад +3

    Why complete divestment on BPCL ? If the hypothesis of valuation increase is true? Shouldn’t the government hold 10-15 percent and sell that in multiple chunks over time make more from it ?

  • @tanmaydeshpande9198
    @tanmaydeshpande9198 4 года назад +16

    Credit where its due. Good work sir

  • @ajaxaj8470
    @ajaxaj8470 4 года назад +2

    I owe you so much SG. Earlier, I'm one of the hardcore right wing bhakt who thinks, talks only with emotions. I used to hate anything, everything which liberals speak. I never thought that a liberal like you will moderate a conservative person like me.

    • @manansharma4178
      @manansharma4178 4 года назад +1

      Bro Problem with liberals is that most of them are pro,marxist /pro islamist ,they are pseudo-liberalism.
      They are against new scientific studies and start labeling thing with hindutwa,
      No problem if any body label us Bhakt beacuse we follow things that the in flow of Universal laws of nature.

    • @ajaxaj8470
      @ajaxaj8470 4 года назад +2

      @@manansharma4178 I agree with you completely. I just started seeing other side of the coin through CTC. That's all. I'm always against those who try to malign and destroy Indian culture and Hinduism

  • @prabodhd
    @prabodhd 2 года назад

    No relation between divestment from public sector companies and new era of pink ball cricket. But for a change, I loved this issue of cut the clutter. It takes courage to dismantle the left turn taken by Indira Congress to push their own agenda of power and bringing back the "British Raj" culture for personal benefits. Modi government has done it with fineness, so much that none of the opposition parties and intelligentsia could figure out the Government's plan behind repealing of 187 archaic laws. I must say, it was a real master stroke by Modi-Shah-Sitaraman.

  • @saikatmitra2585
    @saikatmitra2585 4 года назад +3

    can you do a video on the structure of governance and bureaucracy of indian and how is it outdated and different from the west

  • @nitinkalburgi6727
    @nitinkalburgi6727 4 года назад +4

    I thought the term Socialist was always a part of India's preamble. Anyways I think it's time that we scrap that word out too.

    • @morgothbauglir3609
      @morgothbauglir3609 4 года назад +1

      All for that but with current trend of Government they might strike out secular also .........

    • @nitinkalburgi6727
      @nitinkalburgi6727 4 года назад +1

      @@morgothbauglir3609 True brother😂😅

    • @samarjk3077
      @samarjk3077 4 года назад +1

      @@morgothbauglir3609 😂😂😂😂😂😂

    • @morgothbauglir3609
      @morgothbauglir3609 4 года назад +1

      @@karthika560 any idea what the original text read ???? .

  • @darshilmashru8479
    @darshilmashru8479 4 года назад +2

    But sir, Art. 39(B) is part of the DPSP, which is plainly non-justiciable. W.r.t. the SC's judgment on the BPCL-HPCL privatisation case, the single point on which the SC delivered the verdict in favour of the CPIL, was that the companies were formed by the 1976 Acts of Parliament nationalising Burmah Shell, Caltex and Esso, and it was not possible to privatise them without seeking the parliament's approval.

  • @adityakothiyal3
    @adityakothiyal3 3 года назад +2

    Kash 72 k baad liberal ho jate hum aaj jobs salary jada hoti sbki desh kafi aage hota 7 8 trillion economy hota

  • @dharmeshmajithia2678
    @dharmeshmajithia2678 4 года назад +6

    Indira Gandhi also added word 'Secular'. Shy didn't u mentioned it?

  • @udayrathod3786
    @udayrathod3786 4 года назад +12

    Please talk about Kerala Government's high debt.

    • @vineelkumar6655
      @vineelkumar6655 4 года назад +8

      its all because of communism freebies

    • @udayrathod3786
      @udayrathod3786 4 года назад +2

      @@vineelkumar6655 true, and those morons are still overspending like mad

    • @nachiketdhende8681
      @nachiketdhende8681 4 года назад +1

      Maharashtra government has the highest debt, followed by UP.

    • @mukul2500
      @mukul2500 4 года назад +4

      @@nachiketdhende8681 their debt is due to completely different reason, don't generalize.

    • @hemanshubangera5121
      @hemanshubangera5121 4 года назад

      Please also let him talk about why 70% of our economy is run by a Hand-full families?

  • @arpitadashora3261
    @arpitadashora3261 4 года назад +1

    Hello sir, you explain things very nicely. I just started watching your videos and I am regretting why I have not watched it before

  • @parthsarathi6904
    @parthsarathi6904 4 года назад

    Hey plz add link of articles regarding the cluttered topic. That would be helpful

  • @anshulkatara8779
    @anshulkatara8779 4 года назад +2

    Why we do not exam for poltical post.Why we do not privatise government itself because it is so inefficient.Privatisation of everything is going to harm country in long term.Modi is putting everything on sale

  • @AjayPall
    @AjayPall 4 года назад +3

    Shekhar, first of all - your program cut the clutter is awesome. You speak through my car speakers during my drive from office - everyday single day! I find you very well informed person.
    As someone who was born and raised in Assam (Shivsagar), I want to give you an anecdote about Digboi, Assam. Legend has it that in 1889 a young boy was digging and a viscous dark liquid was coming out from the ground. This was witnessed by an English soldier who earged the boy to continue digging. He used the exact words - Dig Boy Dig! And hence the name of the place where the first oil refinery was Built - Digboi.
    PS: I know you will love this as you had spent a lot of time in the beautiful North East!!

  • @gov544
    @gov544 4 года назад +1

    If privatization is the answer to all our problems than why we are even voting... We should directly contact corporate pay taxes to them and ask them to run the govt. Directly..i mean they are calling the shots from behind anyways ...

    • @cani5761
      @cani5761 3 года назад

      You are stupid

  • @shradhashisprasad93
    @shradhashisprasad93 4 года назад

    Kudos Shekharji. Though I understand the BPCL divestment very well, being an oil professional and also ex BPC staff, and appreciate this bold move of the Govt, but you have decluttered it brilliantly. I just hope and wish the leftists and the political irritants also appreciate it and allows the divestment without any clutters. !!!

  • @0mkarpatil
    @0mkarpatil 4 года назад +11

    she also added the word SECULAR along with the word SOCIALIST, both are illegal, imposed on India by illegitimate parliament

    • @zackz7497
      @zackz7497 4 года назад

      @@Vinchan918 'a nation for all' hona chahiye yaar aur secularism ka saala definition kya hai aaj tak samjh nahi aaya(note- genuinely mujhe secularism ka matlab nahi pata aur mein Islamophob nahi huin)
      Have a good day brothers

    • @0mkarpatil
      @0mkarpatil 4 года назад +1

      @@Vinchan918 whoa, calm down buddy, lets see
      "the belief that religion should not be involved in the organization of society, education, etc."
      This is the oxford definition of secularism.
      India is a deeply religious country. It is stupid to expect from an Indian to keep its religion aside while working in organizations of society.
      its like pope doesn't engage in what Trump is doing, and vice versa. Very good concept in principle, but can be applied in a country which has homogeneous population, ie USA has homogeneous christian population.
      So all in all this very concept is foreign to the spiritual land of India.
      when all these things pointed out to the then government, they said our definition of secularism is different!
      according to them secularism is "sarv dharm samabhav" !
      Again nothing objectionable in the modified concept, India which has " vishwa bandhutwa" in its ethos, it is futile to impose a foreign concept with modified definition on them, especially when it is going to be used to appease the muslims and demeaning the traditions and culture of Hindu community.
      P. S: Here the term ‘Hindus’ also includes individuals who profess Sikh, Jain or Buddhist religion (Article 25 of the Indian constitution)
      The term secularism was never used in Indian constitution, until Indira gandhi forcibly inserted it during the emergency with illegitimate parliament. so does that mean we were killing the minorities, making them run out of the country before 1975? and inserting the very word in the constitution stopped us from committing atrocities on the minorities? NOPE. That's not INDIA, it never was, never will be.

  • @ab1599
    @ab1599 4 года назад +4

    The word Secular too; 42nd Amendment during the emergency... Convenient? miss there, agreed not germane to the topic of the video but then so many snippets often aren't.

  • @praveensharma381
    @praveensharma381 4 года назад +1

    Shekhar ji i have confession to make. I listen to your program which makes everything so clear and then I simplify the issues to my friends. As they don't watch your program they think iam very knowledgeable and intelligent. Haa haa haa
    Hing lagi na phatkari rang chaukha

  • @sujanagavirneni3199
    @sujanagavirneni3199 4 года назад

    India under Mrs. Gandhi’s rule was known only for shortages & licence raj . It was to the credit of Narasimha Rao Ji to unlock the economic potential through reforms.We need to privatise all the PSUs to unlock their economic potential.I congratulate Modi Government for current move of privatisation. Also laud this government for merger of the some PSBs & remaining 11PSBs should also be merged to 3 or 4. Law on I B C was the best initiative to clean up the banks . Modi government has shown the mettle to take hard decisions in the interest of the economy & National interest is the only motive unlike in the Congress/ UPA rule. The simple manner of decluttering by Shekhar ji is appreciable.

  • @Trade1001
    @Trade1001 4 года назад +5

    Watch it at 1.25 speed.

    • @ThePrintIndia
      @ThePrintIndia  4 года назад +17

      You want it even faster than this? I thought i was too fast today?...SG

    • @amittripathi9292
      @amittripathi9292 4 года назад

      @@ThePrintIndia no..it was fine! People can adjust. They have got plenty of options to increase/dec speed but if u compro.. content might get diluted

    • @vaishakmuralidharan7605
      @vaishakmuralidharan7605 4 года назад

      @@ThePrintIndia Please don't speed up your delivery. It's when you pause, we get those kahavats and other tidbits!

    • @LucasKsh
      @LucasKsh 4 года назад +1

      @@ThePrintIndia sir for UPSC aspirant like me,time is precious.

    • @Trade1001
      @Trade1001 4 года назад

      @@LucasKsh I don't know if you are joking or what but I am actually preparing for state PSC. What you said just rang a chord with me. I also plan to appear for UPSC but I am not ready yet.

  • @arjunkharbanda
    @arjunkharbanda 4 года назад +9

    If done right privatization can be a good thing

  • @ranjanoberoi4255
    @ranjanoberoi4255 4 года назад +1

    You have chosen a very good topic to discuss about.This is also the right decision of the govt. to disinvest as much as possible and invest the proceeds to create world class infrastructure and some of the social schemes.

  • @santoshdonawadesantosh4453
    @santoshdonawadesantosh4453 4 года назад

    I used to think SG was a biased and left leaning journalist like any other yet I continued to watch his channel. After watching multiple videos I sensed that this guy does make sense and is indifferent. Keeps his delivery clean and simple. Be it Arrey,Maharashtra political situation etc. Keep up the good work sir!You will have more on your plate after Karnataka by-polls results on Dec 9. Interesting to see if Yeddi's gamble was worth it.

  • @A_for_AML
    @A_for_AML 4 года назад +3

    BPCL Direct profit to india
    Now direct profit to Ambani??

    • @nirmalpauly
      @nirmalpauly 4 года назад +1

      @Soshan Ihsan-Otty BPCL is a making high Profit. Saudi Aramco will be buying it ! Latter it will be sold of to Reliance. And then Reliance will do what it does best make money by squeezing the poor.

    • @mogmaboissad3018
      @mogmaboissad3018 4 года назад

      @@nirmalpauly how?

    • @nirmalpauly
      @nirmalpauly 4 года назад

      @Soshan Ihsan-Otty ecision to sell a 20 per cent stake in its refining and petrochemicals business to Saudi Aramco at an enterprise value of $75 billion has many positives for the Indian behemoth. They are already partners. Since reliance can't takeover directly because of the Open secret that BJP is run By Reliance funding. They just made a middle man which is Aramco. I work in Kochi refinery. It is the largest refinery of BPCL . It has been increasing it's profit every year. The government is selling even though it is in such a good state. Its just common sense that Government is making way for it's master to take over the domestic market .

  • @notohate7724
    @notohate7724 4 года назад +11

    Problem with Modi government they would waste money in all non productive and political schemes.

  • @doncorleone3901
    @doncorleone3901 4 года назад

    Shekhar Gupta is teaching a thing or two to Gen Z. What a treasure house of knowledge. Thank god for RUclips else we would have missed all this

  • @honestman5440
    @honestman5440 4 года назад

    As a token of advance UAE /Saudi Arabia and other gulf countries have given awards to Modi for selling Indian Petroleum market (including companies like BPCL) to them.
    India was importing about 72% of its crude oil requirements earlier and test from domestic sources but now in after Modi became PM India is importing about 82% of its crude oil requirements.
    A 4% increase in a big market like India makes a huge difference.

  • @tapemaj
    @tapemaj 4 года назад +5

    Government of India ought not to be in aviation / oil / railways , etc .
    Privatisation is the answer to India moving forward.

  • @ParikshitBhujbal
    @ParikshitBhujbal 4 года назад +5

    Yes, selling all public owned companies to the Ambanis and Adanis!
    Public loses, rich win.

  • @grv2906
    @grv2906 4 года назад

    The amount of research you do before putting out the report is really commendable

  • @NoneOfTheAbove123
    @NoneOfTheAbove123 4 года назад +1

    But I think to mobilise strategic assets( in case if we have to create strategic oil reserves) nationalised corporations would come in handy. Same goes for the plan to revitalize BSNL-MTNL.

  • @Prasad.Vindhya
    @Prasad.Vindhya 4 года назад +6

    Why did you miss out on the insertion of "secular" word in the same unconstitutional way? :|

  • @jyotisahay2812
    @jyotisahay2812 4 года назад +5

    Jnu too was found in 1969 and its too are attrocities of socialist & communist.

  • @prateeksingh9147
    @prateeksingh9147 4 года назад

    Thankyou sir for explaining all the issues in details, it helps student/faculties/aam admi etc in understanding the concepts n issues.
    Sir if i may , can i make a small request to you, please provide solutions or way forward for the articles you discuss.
    Please dont ever stop cut the clutter section.
    Thankyou sir.

  • @thelastofsamurai9249
    @thelastofsamurai9249 4 года назад +1

    Iam always a fan of this kind of news presentation...old school and awsm

  • @bharathdasari2619
    @bharathdasari2619 4 года назад +5

    Do a story on Andhra Pradesh and it's capital Amaravati.

  • @1591nithin
    @1591nithin 4 года назад +3

    A big mistake to pirvatize BPCL. BPCL is a cashcow which generates huge profits and dividends for government. Its a short sighted measure and would help them get one time large revenue bonanza, but govt would loose dividends from BPCL in future, which would go to private companies.

    • @omprakashraja2300
      @omprakashraja2300 4 года назад +2

      Why govt should do business?

    • @vneetha2862
      @vneetha2862 3 года назад

      @@omprakashraja2300 The dividends Govt receives from oil companies, can be used to regulate petrol and diesel prices for the public.

  • @AkshayBharad-kv9su
    @AkshayBharad-kv9su 4 года назад

    Inspiring research, well drafted and convincingly argued. good wishes

  • @gouravroy2928
    @gouravroy2928 4 года назад +1

    Thanks Shekhar ji, was waiting for your viewpoint.👌

  • @progyandas9650
    @progyandas9650 4 года назад +4

    Marx : Abolish private property
    BJP : Create private property
    Govt Employees: Lunch time , counter is closed

    • @bilalbaig8586
      @bilalbaig8586 4 года назад

      All such Govt. employees should be lined up against a wall and shot. Madarchod hai saare ke saare.

  • @kaushlendrasingh859
    @kaushlendrasingh859 4 года назад +3

    Ongc is going to sell hpcl to the private sector that was also in the news

    • @darshilmashru8479
      @darshilmashru8479 4 года назад +1

      The govt didn't sell it to ONGC for no reason

    • @ThePrintIndia
      @ThePrintIndia  4 года назад +2

      I will be happy if that is done....SG

  • @vibhavagarwalla8718
    @vibhavagarwalla8718 4 года назад +1

    Shekhar: You are actually making sense. Wow!

  • @librielibri2745
    @librielibri2745 4 года назад

    Are Cut The Clutter videos available as articles? If so, where?