I think better advancements of the panzer lV would have been wiser than building tigers, or king tigers. I think that between the type lV and Panther, would have been a better advancement.
BEST COMMENT EVER! It has always been my staunch contention, that Germany should have allocated far, far more of thier scarce recources into producing much larger numbers of: A) The Panzer IV, maybe the aus G ,H, and/or J models, and B) the up-gunned Stug III models... ....RATHER than pumping so much of thier life force into panthers, tigers, and especially the ridiculous Elefant, and King Tiger/jagtiger. If they had, the could have AT LEAST held out much longer. I guess hindsight is 20/20....studying this history tells us that, in this conflict anyway, quantity won out over quality.
If you paid anything for this synthesised voice, then you should ask for your money back.
The voice is AI. I know it's not perfect yet, but I'm working every day to improve
I think better advancements of the panzer lV would have been wiser than building tigers, or king tigers. I think that between the type lV and Panther, would have been a better advancement.
Yes, it is possible. I agree
BEST COMMENT EVER!
It has always been my staunch contention, that Germany should have allocated far, far more of thier scarce recources into producing much larger numbers of:
A) The Panzer IV, maybe the aus G ,H, and/or J models, and
B) the up-gunned Stug III models...
....RATHER than pumping so much of thier life force into panthers, tigers, and especially the ridiculous Elefant, and King Tiger/jagtiger. If they had, the could have AT LEAST held out much longer. I guess hindsight is 20/20....studying this history tells us that, in this conflict anyway, quantity won out over quality.
@@chrismead3150 Yes, I agree, but prolonging the war would mean even more victims, and no one wants that
@@historytimechannel yes of course. Im talking in terms of historical military stratigy, which is just an interesting subject to me.
@@chrismead3150 👍👍👍