But he never got the chance to finish it. The cinema cut is only a shadow of it and Lynch doesn't want to be associated with the TV cut. There is a fan cut, incooperating deleted scenes which is better than TV and cinema cut and much closer to the book. Yes the new DUNE has better special effects, but the older had just the better actors and better character development.
I am quite sure that Lynch's version was quite epic for the time it came out. I saw that movie as a kid and was confused af (understandably) and saw it again as an adult a few years ago before watching Villeneuve's and i am really surprised at how well the Lynch's movie has held up in comparison to today's advabced VFXs.
I played Dune on my fathers old computer (he told me it was his favorite game when he was young) and I begged him to buy me Lynchs old movie... I LOVED it and I hoped so long for a new movie to come out and now here we are
This side-by-side is brilliantly done, and it really illustrates the pure power of editing. I keep looking at the ‘84 half of the screen and thinking, “I want to see THAT movie too!” I love and appreciate all the versions of Dune for different reasons, but now I wonder what a tight, modern re-edit (along with skillful inclusion of the deleted scenes) might be able to cobble together from the ‘84 version.
Thanks for saying so. That modern re-edit is exactly my mission. I believe there is a mad but brilliant film there that has been messed up by editing. I will be launching a video to break those changes down. Stay tuned and subscribe and share.
I've seen serious comments from people claiming the 1984 version is better. They must be out of their minds, tasteless, or just have not even seen the 2024 release but hate it for some absurd reason
I always found the 2000 mini series adaptation to be entertaining for some reason. It somehow intrigued me more than the 1984 movies. Regardless, the books are incredible.
That's because the 2000 miniseries rarely tries to beef up the source material; Baron Harkonnen is as charming and cunning as he is in the book for example. Come movie time he is all butched up and chews the scenery like a Captain Planet villain.
the 2000 mini series keept it very close to the book, if they had more budget for production it would have been the best adaption so far. the 2021 movie cuts so much important stuff and backgroundinfos from the movie so it becomes hard to follow whats realy going on.
the mini series is plain awful. The costumes, the effects, the acting. It really does a disservice to the source material. And no, it was not a budget issue. The art direction was really, really bad and the acting was awfully bland.
This is what I've summarized from other comments so far (across the years on RUclips) : Jodorowsky Dune = Wild Lynch Dune = Artistic Harrison SyFy Dune = Thorough Villeneuve Dune = Technical My favorite will always be Lynch's Dune. It was Universal Pictures who meddled & butchered it. And Frank Herbert understood the concept of an "adaptation" as was said in old news articles, hence he liked the film, or at least most of it. And the 2012 Spicediver Alternative Cut (also upscaled to 4k) edited Lynch's movie closer to Frank's book, thus it is more or less a redemption for Lynch, who sadly lost control of the editing of later cuts. And by the time he was asked to do something like a Director's Cut, he declined due to the trauma. And out of all the different live-action adaptations so far, Lynch's Dune makes the distinction of being the only one who got to work with Frank. One day, when all of us armchair critics are still debating the different Dunes, there will always be another remake on the horizon, 2-5 decades from now. And then another one after that & so forth. Maybe even bickering until the same amount of time has surpassed as in the Dune story, i.e. 20 millennia, which in that time range there will probably be around a million different Dune remakes, lmao.
I liked some things a lot more in the Lynch version and some things a lot more in Villeneuves version. Its actually a nice place to be when looking at 2 different adaptations of the same source material.
Friend, i applaud you for this magnificent effort. What a great comparisson! The Lynch version really has some great stuff in it. it's a pity that the movie was ruined by the studio. As for Villeneuve, he has a great opportunity, I enjoyed the first movie, despite its imperfections. I just hope he will not squander this great chance. Here's to hope!
Much appreciated your comments - while frustrating as it’s cut, you can totally see the movie past it’s short comings. My first three episodes are going to focus on how it could have been saved. Subscribe and keep in the loop, Im very excited
@@Eleriol84 Part 2 is a major disappointment, as far as I am concerned. Villeneuve promised Dune and delivered something else. Too many changes, most for the worse. he squandered his chance. I have no hope left for Messiah. Denis Villeneuve will ruin Messiah just as he ruined Dune.
Excellent. Same as the comparison of Part 1. Just goes to show that there’s a good movie in the Lynch one somewhere. Alas, he’s always said that he’s not interested in recutting it… :(
As a huge Lynch fan, I can appreciate some parts of his Dune but some parts are just inexcusable: Halleck going into battle holding a pug, rain at the end, Hawat's white cat antidote, Fremen never covering their faces and hair, Guild assistants sweeping up when the Guildsman leaves, the Harkonnen cow and midgets. LOL!! It's a great film to watch completely stoned with the sound off.
Yeah as someone born this century, I don't have nostalgia for the film and have to say....it's really godawful. The bizarre cat milking shit, the pugs, the 'weirding modules', the loss of all of the actual themes that matter from the book (like Paul not actually being a hero etc.) are gone, and on and on and on. Lynch was maybe the worst choice for the job out of any major director at the time. Like nearly everything about the movie is staggeringly bad and awkward. I have issues with the newer film but it's leaps and bounds more faithful to the tone of the book.
@@oldleatherhandsfriends4053 If Lynch had those scenes in another film not Dune, It would've been entertaining. Dune is weird enough in its own right. It doesn't need comical embellishment. Lynch said Dune was a gigantic sadness in his life and that he's proud of everything he's done except Dune. He refuses to even talk about it. When a director like Lynch feels that way, well you know it was a bad, mess of a movie. He even pulled an 'Alan Smithee' and demanded that his name not be associated with the extended cut. Watch the credits: Directed by Alan Smithee. Ouch. Enjoy it the way you want. I'll light a big doob and laugh with the sound off.
Dune 1984 was such a superior movie by leaps and bounds. It may not have had the advantages of the visual effects available today for the remake but the 1984 movie was awesome! The actors and their performances were superb in the1984 version.
Watched Lynch's version many times. There are so many memorable scenes, it makes you want to go back to this film again and again. The Emperor's meeting with the navigators, the maid handing the knife to the concubine (especially the deleted scene), the nasty flying baron, the naked Sting, the bald reverend mother with the thimble, the ships flying into the huge golden gate in space, the final battle, and even the credits. I liked the second Dune a lot, but I don't feel like revisiting it, it's not magical.
Exactly this is a magical work.... Lynch's work is a work of art. Lynch can evoke this electrifying atmosphere ... I don't even know what to call it ... his films just have something.
The 1984 movie has charme, he is by no means perfect but it feels right and alive, not centered around action shots also the inner monologues helped the viewer to understand the story, something that i am missing very much in the 2021 film
Indeed. The new Dune has gorgeous shots...but that's all it feels like. A series of shots Villeneuve thought looked good strung together. It's a slide show of set pieces that forgets the necessity of story telling to give weight to what you're seeing. The Lynch's version, for it's many, many faults still has a continuity between the scenes that draws you in.
Both movies suffer from the same problem: a filmmaker having to spend more time and energy fighting the producers than actually achieving his artistic vision. Both directors had to "compromise" and cut scenes so the film had the OK from the studio. both films are "unfinished" pieces of art.
Reading the comments leaves me perplexed. I watched the David LYNCH version at theater sneak preview showing. I read the book, so I thought the movie was awful. The was agreement among my friends. I remember a group of five guys in front who laughed a lot during the spice scenes, and decided to make their exit. The last guy shouted “this movie sucks!” I saw it again on cable years later following the Twin Peaks era. Clearly David LYNCH was all over it. I was looking forward to Villaneuves Dune, and wasn’t disappointed. It spelled things out for those that didn’t read the book, and the incessant thought exposition that I thought was largely unnecessary for Lynch’s interpretation. Dune II, again did not disappointment. There was a magnificence to it, largely true to the story, and had an epic feel like unto Midway, or Lawrence of Arabia. I loved it, and I thought it put Lynch’s version to shame.
I highly doubt Timothee can beat Kyle MacLachlan's delivery: "Try looking into that place where you dare not look! You'll find me there staring out at you!" Forever gives me the goosebumps.
@@oldleatherhandsfriends4053 material creativity is better than green cgi. If only they could capture the same feel more on material and less borish cgi. Dont get me wrong cgi is great but it doesnt capture the same magic like the old dune film. For example that dude with abs and hair, compare to that bald albino dude. I would rather choose the abs and hair dude cause you could feel that certain energy which you can appreciate the details than the other one, his bald, white and has no hair i dont feel it.
@@raymundlopez3726 I was giving you critique in case you missed it. It's this mentality that old things are just good, and new things are bad. In reality that's false, and it's just a mindset you get into if you're lacking in self awarness. People have always done this in all of human history. Reality is is that "old=good" is only "old=good" because of nostalgia and romantizising about what is old. There were some good movies in the 80's for sure, much the same way as there's good movies now, but the modern Dune is just clearly miles ahead of this version. It's fine to love older work while also realizing it's becoming obsolete.
Austin Butler has some big shoes to fill as Feyd compared to Sting. Though since Denis Villeneuve wants you to find the Harkonnens terrifying and not cool, he may have nothing to worry about.
Yes, I agree. The producers and Universal panicked and gouged the move for the sake of deadlines and runtime. Am making a video to illustrate the missteps to show that Lynch and the Editor were robbed. Be sure to subscribe and keep up with the upcoming series
Feyd-Rautha Harkonnen is the second detail I like more in the 84 Version (First is Liet Kynes). I see what they are doing with the new version of him, keeping the harkonnen theme of bald and ugly, but he is very far away from the descripton in the books. Nevertheless Dune Part II will be another masterpiece I think 😄
@@ratatoskr8190 but apart from being bold and white, the new version is still good looking and shredded. Especially in a contrast with Barons’ character or Rabans’. I do not like the new concept of Harkonnens being a bunch of ugly orcs though.
@@imermak Yeah I agree. The Baron himself is great, but I also don't like, that they have this uniform harkonnen theme. I think it's a movie thing, that you can easily say who is who or sth like that.
@@ratatoskr8190 for sure, for audience it’s much easier to differentiate the good guys from the bad guys. But the concept in the book that they Harkonnens are same humans as Atreidis is more appealing to me. Heck I just recalled that Paul is related to Baron. Why isn’t he white or bold then?
2024 takes the aesthetics of the 1984 on crack and also things from the 1992 Cryo game (based on 1984).... +more faithfulness to the story (well with some adaptations that leaves room to be discussed) but nonetheless dune 2020/2024 is the best adaptation so far
Lynch version still looks epic , distinct and lush. Really hope they improve the colouring of Arrakis because it looks beautiful and dreamy and mystical in Lynch version but so uninteresting in the new ones.
Кино
He who controls the hype controls the universe.
This could be the best comment. Short, sweet, pithy.
the hype must flow
Lol. That’s right
I must hype. Hype is the mind-saver. Hype is the little-life that brings total joy.
Espero por ver a este "haaland" pelado que grita gol
"your father didn't believe in revenge"
"well I fucking do"
I appreciate the effort David lynch made
I don't
nope
Me too
@@pilote111 it's not perfect but he did his best with what he had
But he never got the chance to finish it.
The cinema cut is only a shadow of it and Lynch doesn't want to be associated with the TV cut.
There is a fan cut, incooperating deleted scenes which is better than TV and cinema cut and much closer to the book.
Yes the new DUNE has better special effects, but the older had just the better actors and better character development.
2024's worm riding: "BITCH HOLD THIS SHIT OR Y'ALL GONNNA DDIIIIE"
80's worm riding: "well, what a beautiful day here in townsville!"
Wow, if anything I think this further convinced me how big of a part of Villeneuve's version's brilliance is in the sound-design.
I am quite sure that Lynch's version was quite epic for the time it came out.
I saw that movie as a kid and was confused af (understandably) and saw it again as an adult a few years ago before watching Villeneuve's and i am really surprised at how well the Lynch's movie has held up in comparison to today's advabced VFXs.
I agree - I think the only real flaw on Dune84 is the extreme interference on the editing narrative.
Lych characters had *style* that's for sure.
no, its sh1t, compare to star wars that came years earlier
I agree with the exception of the shields from that movie.
@@JackSmith-ns1uq I agree with the shields. Completely outdated CGI
I played Dune on my fathers old computer (he told me it was his favorite game when he was young) and I begged him to buy me Lynchs old movie... I LOVED it and I hoped so long for a new movie to come out and now here we are
Sean Young will always be among the most alluring visages to grace the screen.
She is and will always Chani
@JeffPietersen different version, both are adaptations of the same book(s)
This side-by-side is brilliantly done, and it really illustrates the pure power of editing. I keep looking at the ‘84 half of the screen and thinking, “I want to see THAT movie too!”
I love and appreciate all the versions of Dune for different reasons, but now I wonder what a tight, modern re-edit (along with skillful inclusion of the deleted scenes) might be able to cobble together from the ‘84 version.
Thanks for saying so. That modern re-edit is exactly my mission. I believe there is a mad but brilliant film there that has been messed up by editing. I will be launching a video to break those changes down. Stay tuned and subscribe and share.
@@GETITINTHEEDIT Right on! I am subscribed and I'm looking forward to whatever you do!
@@GETITINTHEEDIT you have problem with eyes?
Hype is the mind killer. But I can't resist in that case :)
Hype is the little death that brings total obliteration.
honestly deserved the first one was really good, rarely happens nowdays
It won't be Disney's Woke that is for sure
@@pan2aja shut up 😭
They turned Sting into a creepy weirdo!!! Definite improvement.
Appreciate the efforts went into this video
Thanks for recognising the effort, it drove me crazy but got me exited in equal measures.
This is fantastic! I like the juxtaposition of "The Sleeper Has Awakened"/"Long Live The Fighters".
I've seen serious comments from people claiming the 1984 version is better. They must be out of their minds, tasteless, or just have not even seen the 2024 release but hate it for some absurd reason
Cult behavior. And I like the 84 one for what it was, just not nearly as much as the new ones.
It's the Lynch cult.
Cult mentality and nostalgia bating.
Even Without Graphics old version Look Amazing hatsoff David
What are smoking it looks like ass
I always found the 2000 mini series adaptation to be entertaining for some reason. It somehow intrigued me more than the 1984 movies. Regardless, the books are incredible.
That's because the 2000 miniseries rarely tries to beef up the source material; Baron Harkonnen is as charming and cunning as he is in the book for example. Come movie time he is all butched up and chews the scenery like a Captain Planet villain.
the 2000 mini series keept it very close to the book, if they had more budget for production it would have been the best adaption so far. the 2021 movie cuts so much important stuff and backgroundinfos from the movie so it becomes hard to follow whats realy going on.
the mini series is plain awful. The costumes, the effects, the acting. It really does a disservice to the source material. And no, it was not a budget issue. The art direction was really, really bad and the acting was awfully bland.
@@grproteus I'm not trying to say it was good or great, just for whatever reason it was what got me more into reading the full Dune series.
This is what I've summarized from other comments so far (across the years on RUclips) :
Jodorowsky Dune = Wild
Lynch Dune = Artistic
Harrison SyFy Dune = Thorough
Villeneuve Dune = Technical
My favorite will always be Lynch's Dune. It was Universal Pictures who meddled & butchered it. And Frank Herbert understood the concept of an "adaptation" as was said in old news articles, hence he liked the film, or at least most of it. And the 2012 Spicediver Alternative Cut (also upscaled to 4k) edited Lynch's movie closer to Frank's book, thus it is more or less a redemption for Lynch, who sadly lost control of the editing of later cuts. And by the time he was asked to do something like a Director's Cut, he declined due to the trauma. And out of all the different live-action adaptations so far, Lynch's Dune makes the distinction of being the only one who got to work with Frank. One day, when all of us armchair critics are still debating the different Dunes, there will always be another remake on the horizon, 2-5 decades from now. And then another one after that & so forth. Maybe even bickering until the same amount of time has surpassed as in the Dune story, i.e. 20 millennia, which in that time range there will probably be around a million different Dune remakes, lmao.
I enjoyed that
The David lynch version has always been a favourite of mine
Me too. The soundtrack is very good too.
84 Dune feels more mature, i dont know... Maybe If the New version were PG 16 instead 13 It Would be better and deeper.
I still like the David Lynch version. Was good contrary to the reviews and the initial box office. I like both versions now. Older and new.
I liked some things a lot more in the Lynch version and some things a lot more in Villeneuves version. Its actually a nice place to be when looking at 2 different adaptations of the same source material.
I Miss Epic the Toto Music and Riffs by Lucather, something you can't replace.
Brian Eno with the prophecy theme
Actually working on a Trailer cut that is all DUNE 89 with TOTO leading the soundtrack - Subscribe and watch this space
Dude DUDE, the back to back, word for word shot of "LONG LIVE THE FIGHTERS" with "THE SLEEPER HAS AWAKENED" gave me fucking /chills/
Excellent job!
I actually really enjoyed the first part. The sound is huge part of it.
Hans Zimmer über alles
amazing sound design
Haha the contrast in worm-riding.
Friend, i applaud you for this magnificent effort. What a great comparisson! The Lynch version really has some great stuff in it. it's a pity that the movie was ruined by the studio. As for Villeneuve, he has a great opportunity, I enjoyed the first movie, despite its imperfections. I just hope he will not squander this great chance. Here's to hope!
Much appreciated your comments - while frustrating as it’s cut, you can totally see the movie past it’s short comings. My first three episodes are going to focus on how it could have been saved. Subscribe and keep in the loop, Im very excited
@@GETITINTHEEDIT Oh, yes, I have already subscribed. looking forward to them ! :-)
9 months later and all the fears are dispelled and part 2 was brilliant
@@Eleriol84 Part 2 is a major disappointment, as far as I am concerned. Villeneuve promised Dune and delivered something else. Too many changes, most for the worse. he squandered his chance. I have no hope left for Messiah. Denis Villeneuve will ruin Messiah just as he ruined Dune.
Art director of 1984 dune is crazy..
Excellent. Same as the comparison of Part 1. Just goes to show that there’s a good movie in the Lynch one somewhere. Alas, he’s always said that he’s not interested in recutting it… :(
Seems like the creator of these videos should just re edit the whole 84 movie at this point lol
@@uglyfb9133 You’re not wrong.
Search for Dune Spicediver edit.
@@uglyfb9133 there are very good edits based on the extended release which makes the move much more palatable.
It's impressive how closely they re-made the trailer! I can't wait to see the movie!
Actually, I cut the 84 trailer to demonstrate how much 2021 was like the original in side by side -
@GET IT IN THE EDIT that did cross my mind lol! Great edit!
As a huge Lynch fan, I can appreciate some parts of his Dune but some parts are just inexcusable: Halleck going into battle holding a pug, rain at the end, Hawat's white cat antidote, Fremen never covering their faces and hair, Guild assistants sweeping up when the Guildsman leaves, the Harkonnen cow and midgets. LOL!!
It's a great film to watch completely stoned with the sound off.
What's the problem with the guild assistants?
You just named some of the great aspects of Lynches Dune. He made a world the same but very different then the one we understand.
Yeah as someone born this century, I don't have nostalgia for the film and have to say....it's really godawful. The bizarre cat milking shit, the pugs, the 'weirding modules', the loss of all of the actual themes that matter from the book (like Paul not actually being a hero etc.) are gone, and on and on and on. Lynch was maybe the worst choice for the job out of any major director at the time. Like nearly everything about the movie is staggeringly bad and awkward.
I have issues with the newer film but it's leaps and bounds more faithful to the tone of the book.
nope. the cat antidote was awesome!
@@oldleatherhandsfriends4053 If Lynch had those scenes in another film not Dune, It would've been entertaining. Dune is weird enough in its own right. It doesn't need comical embellishment.
Lynch said Dune was a gigantic sadness in his life and that he's proud of everything he's done except Dune. He refuses to even talk about it. When a director like Lynch feels that way, well you know it was a bad, mess of a movie. He even pulled an 'Alan Smithee' and demanded that his name not be associated with the extended cut. Watch the credits: Directed by Alan Smithee. Ouch.
Enjoy it the way you want. I'll light a big doob and laugh with the sound off.
Dune 1984 was such a superior movie by leaps and bounds. It may not have had the advantages of the visual effects available today for the remake but the 1984 movie was awesome! The actors and their performances were superb in the1984 version.
Damn, Virginia Madsen had it going on.
Vm is Epic watch Electric Dreams
Damn OP, this is great.
Really fine work, congratulations!
Watched Lynch's version many times. There are so many memorable scenes, it makes you want to go back to this film again and again. The Emperor's meeting with the navigators, the maid handing the knife to the concubine (especially the deleted scene), the nasty flying baron, the naked Sting, the bald reverend mother with the thimble, the ships flying into the huge golden gate in space, the final battle, and even the credits. I liked the second Dune a lot, but I don't feel like revisiting it, it's not magical.
Exactly this is a magical work.... Lynch's work is a work of art. Lynch can evoke this electrifying atmosphere ... I don't even know what to call it ... his films just have something.
The 1984 movie has charme, he is by no means perfect but it feels right and alive, not centered around action shots also the inner monologues helped the viewer to understand the story, something that i am missing very much in the 2021 film
Indeed. The new Dune has gorgeous shots...but that's all it feels like. A series of shots Villeneuve thought looked good strung together. It's a slide show of set pieces that forgets the necessity of story telling to give weight to what you're seeing. The Lynch's version, for it's many, many faults still has a continuity between the scenes that draws you in.
Both movies suffer from the same problem: a filmmaker having to spend more time and energy fighting the producers than actually achieving his artistic vision.
Both directors had to "compromise" and cut scenes so the film had the OK from the studio. both films are "unfinished" pieces of art.
@@Hans-Yolo You just defined the difference between genius and talent. It's been 40 years and people are still discussing the 'old' Lynch film.
At least the original Chani was hot tho
After all these years, the most faithful adaptation still remains to be the first Dune PC game released in 1992.
Father of Command & Conquer
@@azursmile actually I think a previous game that I really loved when I waa a child, not the RTS that was Dune II (the first RTS)
This one? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dune_(video_game)
I loved Emperor - Battle for Dune. One of my fav childhood games.
@@deriderex I still play that game. The Final campaign missions were brutal.
Holy shit, this was so well done.
Dope edit! I love it
Again, well done 👏
great job!
Reading the comments leaves me perplexed. I watched the David LYNCH version at theater sneak preview showing. I read the book, so I thought the movie was awful. The was agreement among my friends. I remember a group of five guys in front who laughed a lot during the spice scenes, and decided to make their exit. The last guy shouted “this movie sucks!”
I saw it again on cable years later following the Twin Peaks era. Clearly David LYNCH was all over it.
I was looking forward to Villaneuves Dune, and wasn’t disappointed. It spelled things out for those that didn’t read the book, and the incessant thought exposition that I thought was largely unnecessary for Lynch’s interpretation. Dune II, again did not disappointment. There was a magnificence to it, largely true to the story, and had an epic feel like unto Midway, or Lawrence of Arabia. I loved it, and I thought it put Lynch’s version to shame.
THE. SLEEPER. HAS. AWAKEND!
AND. HE. WANTS. HIS. COFFEE!
I highly doubt Timothee can beat Kyle MacLachlan's delivery: "Try looking into that place where you dare not look! You'll find me there staring out at you!"
Forever gives me the goosebumps.
Given how the Lynch movie tended to stick much closer to the book dialogue, the new movie might not even use that.
Actually Kyle was the in-house expert on Dune, he contributed allot to the character, as was a big book fan and he knew well before going in.
Wasn't in the book though, so we won't see that.
Kyle was kind of a joke in the first Dune movie. I think Timmy is way better even if hes a scrawny little shit
Lmao this is amazing!! 😂 I love it on so many levels
Thanks for that - more to come on all things dune and new cult movies
Раньше было лучше! А для того времени это был настоящий шедевр!
Would like to see the same trailer cut with the sound and music of the 1984 version.
That is one of the all time great movie intros, I still have that playing in the background while playing sci fi games.
That and Gustav Holst.
Brian Eno prophecy theme was epic
bro...i need that, 84 soundtrack still superior but i have to admit that part 2 sounds hopeful
@@ghregoryk4830 Flash Gordon soundtrack was good too
"Usul has called a big one! Again, it is the legend"
The old dune has a much more richness. The era if the 80s were magical
they used to spend more of the Budget on fleshing out the world through the sets.
@@oldleatherhandsfriends4053 material creativity is better than green cgi. If only they could capture the same feel more on material and less borish cgi. Dont get me wrong cgi is great but it doesnt capture the same magic like the old dune film.
For example that dude with abs and hair, compare to that bald albino dude. I would rather choose the abs and hair dude cause you could feel that certain energy which you can appreciate the details than the other one, his bald, white and has no hair i dont feel it.
Old=good New=bad
@@isakferm7674 agrees. Old is still a good gold.
@@raymundlopez3726 I was giving you critique in case you missed it. It's this mentality that old things are just good, and new things are bad. In reality that's false, and it's just a mindset you get into if you're lacking in self awarness. People have always done this in all of human history. Reality is is that "old=good" is only "old=good" because of nostalgia and romantizising about what is old. There were some good movies in the 80's for sure, much the same way as there's good movies now, but the modern Dune is just clearly miles ahead of this version. It's fine to love older work while also realizing it's becoming obsolete.
1984 version still got it though. The wardrobes were amazingly and gorgeously designed. The shield, however...😂😂
looking forward to part 2
Thanks, that was fun.
I AM SO HYPED FOR THIS MOVIE
Every step you take
I'll be watching you
heck of an edit!
Supercool. What a fun project
Thanks for that - More like this to come for Dune, just Subscribe and watch this space
Beautiful
0:50 spooks me every time.
Austin Butler has some big shoes to fill as Feyd compared to Sting. Though since Denis Villeneuve wants you to find the Harkonnens terrifying and not cool, he may have nothing to worry about.
Austin Butler hype me much more than the sting version
yeah Sting as Feyd and the worms design are the few things i legit like from the Lynch version, i hope Butler kills it.
The david lynch one was just rushed. It's shockingly good and then shockingly mashed at the end.
Yes, I agree. The producers and Universal panicked and gouged the move for the sake of deadlines and runtime. Am making a video to illustrate the missteps to show that Lynch and the Editor were robbed. Be sure to subscribe and keep up with the upcoming series
Came here to say, having seen both new movies, I can confirm, Lynch 1984 IS THE BEST.
Lynch was ahead of times
Classic 1984 Worms were more impressive/menacing imo, I love both interpretations tho
Dune '84 is so good. Great movie.
I thought it has Erling Haaland in the thumbnail. Clicked it. No regrets
I couldn’t figure it out at first but he’s making the face of the girl yelling at the cat at the dinner table
The 1984 version is epic!
nope
It is. It's a real sci-fi classic.
@@blackmennewstyle still nope
@@yeyyeyyey5104 Still being a dick
@@yeyyeyyey5104 dipshit take
The two versions trade advantages in mise en scene, but Lynch's is better for one reason: it seems more human, even when it's monstrous
Most of the comments that praise Lynch’s dune end up describing villeneuves dune instead
holy fuck this is awesome 84 Sean Young, Pauls Mother, so epic
This is really cool!
Thanks for saying so pal, there’s more to come, subscribe and share the vids.
Feyd-Rautha Harkonnen is the second detail I like more in the 84 Version (First is Liet Kynes). I see what they are doing with the new version of him, keeping the harkonnen theme of bald and ugly, but he is very far away from the descripton in the books. Nevertheless Dune Part II will be another masterpiece I think 😄
Dude, no offence to Sting, but his version of Feyd looked way more ugly and silly than Austin's version.
@@TheAris621 Yeah but if I remember right, Feyd in the book is the opposite of his uncle . Good looking and shredded.
@@ratatoskr8190 but apart from being bold and white, the new version is still good looking and shredded. Especially in a contrast with Barons’ character or Rabans’. I do not like the new concept of Harkonnens being a bunch of ugly orcs though.
@@imermak Yeah I agree. The Baron himself is great, but I also don't like, that they have this uniform harkonnen theme. I think it's a movie thing, that you can easily say who is who or sth like that.
@@ratatoskr8190 for sure, for audience it’s much easier to differentiate the good guys from the bad guys. But the concept in the book that they Harkonnens are same humans as Atreidis is more appealing to me. Heck I just recalled that Paul is related to Baron. Why isn’t he white or bold then?
Excellent
"Usual has caught a big one. Again it is the legend."
A lot of scenes from 84 dune look better.
Sting prancing out and grinning is hilarious though
All look better
'84 Dune had a 30% higher budget than return of the Jedi, of course it looks good.
2024 takes the aesthetics of the 1984 on crack and also things from the 1992 Cryo game (based on 1984).... +more faithfulness to the story (well with some adaptations that leaves room to be discussed) but nonetheless dune 2020/2024 is the best adaptation so far
OMGOMGOMGOMG !!!! Can’t wait. 🤯
Some great clips both. I love Villenueve's shots at scale, but Fincher shoots so well too. Both geniuses!
??? David Lynch...'84
>Fincher
top kek, put me on the screen cap
If you like David Fincher's Dune, you should check out David Fincher's Terminator 2: Fight club!
That Midjourney 80s version of dune is insane.
Actually 1984 one looking good
Incredible.
sting in a speedo will always be the better version
It’s so cool David Lynch is making Dune 2 the way he intended. 😋
1983 skills vs 2020+ thanks for woking up
???
Lynch version still looks epic , distinct and lush. Really hope they improve the colouring of Arrakis because it looks beautiful and dreamy and mystical in Lynch version but so uninteresting in the new ones.
I'm getting a bit nervous. Feyd was pretty, not demonic looking. He was actually very charming until he wasn't.
I'm wondering if they'll include the scene where Feyd tries to use one of the baron's slaves to assassinate him. That was one of my favorite chapters.
we knew what he will look like when we saw that new movie made them all alien looking and dressed in black all the time
@@sillylittlesheepjax6009 I'm trying to remember to allow for artistic expression, but as a student of the lore I'm nitpicky.
Wow Villeneuve film color is really cooooold
Actual movie. 🙌🏻
Ambas en su momento espectaculares. Una de las historias de ciencia ficción mas apasionantes de todos lo tiempos.
1:03 не ну это жесть...
👏👏👏👏👏
Well done!
I'm more partial to the Lynch version
It looked way hotter in 1984's desert.
Dune 1984 - best
How f@{king marvelous...
Can’t wait
I still want Jodorowsky's Dune 😔
Good job
84 made looks better for book fans
The worm was really impressive in david film
Princess irulem was also gorgeous
Itzzzz gunnna be gooooooooooooooooooooood.
Am I the only one who thinks the only thing missing from the new dune movies that could further improve them is the soundtrack from the 1984 version
The new dune does not include Sting in Michelin underwear, making it an inferior version.
THE PAINNNNN!!!!
That was great