Cheque Bounce Cases होंगे DISMISS 2024 | N.I Act, 1881| kerala High Court's Latest Judgement.

Hello Everyone.In this video,We will discuss about the latest legal developments, Complainant Failed To Prove Cheque Was Issued Against Legally Enforceable Debt: Kerala High Court Acquits Accused.
Case: Rahiya v. Jasna and ors (2024, Kerala High Court)
Judgement Link👇
drive.google.c...
An offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is committed no sooner a cheque drawn by accused on an account being maintained by him in a bank for discharge of debt/ liability is returned unpaid for insufficiency of funds or for the reason that the amount exceeds the arrangement made with the CHEQUE BOUNCE - Landmark Supreme Court Judgement | SECTION 138 NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT ACT
138 Negotiable Instruments Act is a bailable offence as it is punishable with imprisonment which may extend to two years.
PUNISHMENT: After the amendment of 2002 the imprisonment that may be imposed may extend to two years, while fine may extend to twice the amount of cheque.
Related Videos:
• CHEQUE BOUNCE - Landma...
• New Guidelines on CHEQ...
• CHECK BOUNCE SECT138 N...
• CHEQUE BOUNCE - Suprem...
• Landmark Judgment of S...
• Cheque bounce case अब ...
Your queries-
section 138 punishment ,
section 138 of negotiable instrument act time limit,
section 138 in hindi,
cheque bounce section 138,
Is 138 a criminal case?
What is the new rule of Section 138?
section 138 of negotiable instrument act धारा 138 परक्राम्य लिखत अधिनियम
How to defend section 138?
section 138 of sarfaesi act
legally enforceable debts,
"legally enforceable debt",
post dated cheque,
DIPAK misra,
no debt liability,
post dated cheques,
indus airways,
advance cheque,
sampelly
out dated cheque
legally enforceable
post dated cheque and cheque
no purchase order
enforcable debt
"dipak misra"
renewable energy
dlt
adarsh
loan agreement
Follow me on Instagram link👇
...
Join my Telegram channel
t.me/Law_Diary_07
Thanks for Watching...Sharing... Subscribing.....🙏
Disclaimer: The content used in this video is only for educational purposes and u/s 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statutes that might otherwise be infringing.
The Channel is a platform to educate general public in need of legal information. Videos only contain general and legal information on law. It is not professional legal advice and should not be construed as such. This is only dissemination of general information on law.
#niact #negotiableinstrument #cheques #chequebouncecase #supremecourt #highcourt #judiciary #judiciaryexams #sec138niact #sec138 #lawdiary #keralahighcourt

[@sonaboutique2065]

Sahi hai.

[@akilshaikh2521]

ये तोह गलत फैसला हे
ऐसा नहीं होना चाहिए
सामने वाले के पेसो का क्या हुआ फिर???
उसका सारा पैसा तोह डूब गया ना एक गलत फैसला से