Really glad CIG seems to be focusing on bugs and existing capabilities instead of adding more half baked features. All features do not have to be polished but should be functional/usable.
When testing the bombs, try to make your self hostile (red) to the Polaris, and then drop the bombs. Also the pilot of the Polaris should try targeting you.
I want to know how the Med beds were broken by CIG recently. They didn't touch anything related to medical since the Nursa came out, so it seems like CIG may have a bad actor in their midsts. At every company that I've been a developer for, we always had incident retrospectives every time we broke something in Prod that impacted user experience. I want to see CIG's incident retrospectives for all of the things they break in Prod.
Thank you a lot Foxy! Looks as you works better then CIG QA team =) Could you please have a look to 4.0 eptu (when it will be stable) and say what is working in Pyro and what activities are available there? You are my main and most reliable SC youtuber =)
@ they removed two visible MFD’s So now the pilot has zero information. They have to hold F and look Down to get information or change things taking their eyes off the “space road”
The Storm tonk itself is the issue right now. It was behaving like that out in the open for me this PTU patch. So sad as I do enjoy it for getting around
Starlancer’s qt fuel capacity got a nerf too. I think from 8scu to 3. That’s a huge difference. But it’s now almost on par with Connie Taurus and I’ve never run out of fuel in that so I think it’s alright. It’s still a lot of fuel. More than 600i even.
i think its better balanced with the pdc only shooting back whatever locks onto the ship or has a IR signature. Dropping bombs takes skill and shouldnt be easily countered by pdc
But the issue with the storm tank is maybe because it's too big, I had in previous patches smaller vehicle in there and it was not bouncing zero issues
I personally think we are looking at $70 so Syulen pricing and the Syulen has 2x S1 Shields and double the DPS so the Intrepid will need a size 5 and an extra size 1 shield to be on par.
For the PDC, was your ship a hostile ship at the time the bomb was launched? Because if the bomb inherits the hostility of the launcher and you're not hostile, then it inherits nothing, and the PDC shouldn't target it....
1:49 I wish that radar was larger for the co-pilot, giving them more of a tactical presence when you have one. Then the radar to reduce down when in control if the pilot gets up to the standard pilots' size radar.
Also are the elevator buttons fixed in Starlancer Max Foxy? We had to use the menu wheel for it to select where to go. We couldn’t actually click the buttons on the screen shown. Is this fixed?
Nobody wants a capital ship to be strong? Huh? Also it can withstand over 10 s10 torps, but dies to s9's. And its own torps cant even hit an Idris due to Idris PDC. It needs a buff.. It cant do its intended role. Also how is it fragile? Its getting soft deathed to an A2 bomb, the largest weapon in the game.
@@Baleur Even hitting a Polaris with the torps from a Ballista ground vehicle will soft death the polaris, and the PDs don't track them well. I was within 2 km from the ground in a free fly and a ballista took me out with the 2 s7 torps and i was able to recreate it reliably.
Good upgrade on the intrepid. The Terrapin medical still needs seating for patients/doctor/nurse and a weapon/tool rack for tractor beams and medical equipment. The missing bed for bed logging is fine, its a service ship, not a camper. Have you tested if you can refuel ships inside the Polaris yet? It hasn't worked until now, maybe its fixed. I'm not going to cash in for it, if this doesn't work. Highly appreciate you taking the time on all these tests, we know how tedious and time consuming they can be.
"can detect hostile bombs" 5:53 yoyu failed to be able to read on higher level than 7years old kid. The word "HOSTILE" the ship was not considered hostile shoot each other few times and then drop the bombs you gonna se what is going to happen
@ The Titan already outclasses everything else in its class, so as far as I’m concerned that’s not a super valid criticism. And tbh I don’t WANT a starter stronger than the titan - powercreep is bad enough, we don’t need to encourage it
You ever tried switching the size 4 on the vanguard to a size 5? You get so many less shots it is hardly worth it, and they fire way slower. Vanguard has a size 2 power plant and this thing has size one, you wouldn't get very many shots at all
![Lethal Company Music Video 🎵 "Follow The Orders" [VERSION A]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/QeooZB4Z7RA/mqdefault.jpg)
![PYRO 101 Part.1 - Navigating Pyro & Which Home Location To Choose In Pyro | Star Citizen Guide [4K]](/img/1.gif)
Really glad CIG seems to be focusing on bugs and existing capabilities instead of adding more half baked features. All features do not have to be polished but should be functional/usable.
When testing the bombs, try to make your self hostile (red) to the Polaris, and then drop the bombs. Also the pilot of the Polaris should try targeting you.
Yeah, I was thinking the same thing. The A1/2 wasn't marked hostile until the bombs exploded, so the PDC's wouldn't fire at the bombs.
@@harabecswurveweathers that's what he was testing though
@@mndeg well in the description it literally tells you it inherits the ships status as in is it hostile or not...
This is exactly it. Sneak attack is possible but after hostility is detected, THEN it will engage. This needs some adjustment
@@ericwollaston5654 i mean yeah ... a bomb being dropped towards you should you know... be considered a hostile act in and of itself right?
I'm strongly thinking pilot radar on the Max should be more angled to the pilot.
Would make a good deal of sense, but CIG doesn't deal in that.
That is such good news. I can use my Cutty Red again. Thanks for the update!
I want to know how the Med beds were broken by CIG recently. They didn't touch anything related to medical since the Nursa came out, so it seems like CIG may have a bad actor in their midsts. At every company that I've been a developer for, we always had incident retrospectives every time we broke something in Prod that impacted user experience. I want to see CIG's incident retrospectives for all of the things they break in Prod.
Thank you a lot Foxy! Looks as you works better then CIG QA team =)
Could you please have a look to 4.0 eptu (when it will be stable) and say what is working in Pyro and what activities are available there?
You are my main and most reliable SC youtuber =)
Nice. Now they need to revert the Starlancer MFD changes.
I’m not up to date with all the updates what’s wrong with the star lancer huds
@ they removed two visible MFD’s
So now the pilot has zero information. They have to hold F and look Down to get information or change things taking their eyes off the “space road”
@@Vioblightfair enough I’ll check it out, normally don’t notice these sort of changes since I play with quake pro levels of FOV
@Vioblight just use mfd casting.
@ what is MFD casting?
Thank Goodness!!!
The Cutless Red Medical screens have a better resolution than those of Carrack ^^
The Storm tonk itself is the issue right now. It was behaving like that out in the open for me this PTU patch. So sad as I do enjoy it for getting around
Guarantee the buff was to boost sales. It will get rebalanced back down later. That is a certainty.
The starlancer is not meant to fit a storm. Up to ursa in size was the guidance
Starlancer’s qt fuel capacity got a nerf too. I think from 8scu to 3. That’s a huge difference. But it’s now almost on par with Connie Taurus and I’ve never run out of fuel in that so I think it’s alright. It’s still a lot of fuel. More than 600i even.
no its not alright, its a bigger, more expensive ship and a dedicated hauler.
Intrepid looking better with a gun that matches its silhouette. Still needs to he cheaper than the Avanger but its actually viable now
i think its better balanced with the pdc only shooting back whatever locks onto the ship or has a IR signature. Dropping bombs takes skill and shouldnt be easily countered by pdc
But the issue with the storm tank is maybe because it's too big, I had in previous patches smaller vehicle in there and it was not bouncing zero issues
I personally think we are looking at $70 so Syulen pricing and the Syulen has 2x S1 Shields and double the DPS so the Intrepid will need a size 5 and an extra size 1 shield to be on par.
It won't be Syulen-priced. Syulen's price includes the "alien tax". Intrepid will probably be closely-priced to the Cutter.
@wun1gee with the size of the interior I'm not sure on that.
What about the Starlifter landing gear bug fix? I need that one.
The Tank goes in once.... lol
For the PDC, was your ship a hostile ship at the time the bomb was launched? Because if the bomb inherits the hostility of the launcher and you're not hostile, then it inherits nothing, and the PDC shouldn't target it....
The Storm tank has been having the bouncing problem for some time.
People will buy the Intrepud and be surprised when the weapon is balanced back to S3 lol
What is your pc setup? Mainly graphic card.
1:49 I wish that radar was larger for the co-pilot, giving them more of a tactical presence when you have one. Then the radar to reduce down when in control if the pilot gets up to the standard pilots' size radar.
Well the tank fits but some minor details on parking?
Also are the elevator buttons fixed in Starlancer Max Foxy? We had to use the menu wheel for it to select where to go. We couldn’t actually click the buttons on the screen shown. Is this fixed?
I see the same as you but yesterday I was watching a new video looking at the Starlancer and he was pressing the buttons 🤔
@@RobinHartJones really? Can you link the video here or let me know the channel name?
Avenger Titan says a size 4 is not so awesome without friends.
Were you able to log off on starlancer bed?
Starlancers are gonna have THAT tiny ass radar when the cockpit is 90% dashboard???????
What are the changes to the QT fuel tank?
intrepid doesn't look so trashy now in terms of weaponry. still better starters nut if its beefy i think i could say yay than nay
Can't wait for the Apollo
Shows just how fragile the Polaris is atm, that shouldn't change as that would be P2W and OP, no one wants that for a $900 ship
The cig will do anything to push sales.
@@spiritofsound8469 Are they like the FBI?
Nobody wants a capital ship to be strong? Huh?
Also it can withstand over 10 s10 torps, but dies to s9's. And its own torps cant even hit an Idris due to Idris PDC.
It needs a buff.. It cant do its intended role.
Also how is it fragile? Its getting soft deathed to an A2 bomb, the largest weapon in the game.
@@Baleur Even hitting a Polaris with the torps from a Ballista ground vehicle will soft death the polaris, and the PDs don't track them well. I was within 2 km from the ground in a free fly and a ballista took me out with the 2 s7 torps and i was able to recreate it reliably.
Now intrepid is actually valid as a starter ship.
Not for anything above $50, but its valid at least.
intrepid is really fast and has a suit locker. it has its own niche already
What a bummer no 4.0 tonight… tf was the patch even for lol? Testing a hotfix?
Yeah, it is, but its not ready so i can wait.
@@AgnosiaAgnosis cry about it....
Good upgrade on the intrepid.
The Terrapin medical still needs seating for patients/doctor/nurse and a weapon/tool rack for tractor beams and medical equipment.
The missing bed for bed logging is fine, its a service ship, not a camper.
Have you tested if you can refuel ships inside the Polaris yet? It hasn't worked until now, maybe its fixed. I'm not going to cash in for it, if this doesn't work.
Highly appreciate you taking the time on all these tests, we know how tedious and time consuming they can be.
4.0 in Wave 1??? i dont have it
He said it was delayed
"can detect hostile bombs"
5:53 yoyu failed to be able to read on higher level than 7years old kid.
The word "HOSTILE" the ship was not considered hostile shoot each other few times and then drop the bombs you gonna se what is going to happen
they gave it a size 4, and its still underpowered af.
its a STARTER ship bruh, u like a ares ion canon on that or what
It’s a competitor for the cheapest ships in the game. S4 is totally fine
@viscounttudon68 lmao, avenger titan.
@classicmac8986 go tickle an M50 with your size 4 and shut the fuck up.
@ The Titan already outclasses everything else in its class, so as far as I’m concerned that’s not a super valid criticism. And tbh I don’t WANT a starter stronger than the titan - powercreep is bad enough, we don’t need to encourage it
S4 in the intrepid is ok. Releasing the ship before sales to hear the community is a great idea from CIG.
Should be a size 5.
You ever tried switching the size 4 on the vanguard to a size 5? You get so many less shots it is hardly worth it, and they fire way slower. Vanguard has a size 2 power plant and this thing has size one, you wouldn't get very many shots at all
@@CMDR-Ashtar What are you talking about, currently size 4 and size 5 have the same ammo count for laser weapon. You just get a bump in dps or alpha
A size 5 on a starter ship is crazy. 😂😂
We get a S4 gun on a starter ship….2 seconds later….”aww I wish it was a size 5” 😄
o7
size 4 lets goooooo
C8R