One of the biggest tennis tournaments in the world has hawkeye readily available and yet they choose to be archaeologists examining the ball prints up close with their fingers
The problem is not even with wrong calls but that if there was a hawkeye eye, the player would not feel that he was unfairly judged . This would not impact the psychology so much. It's ok to miss but it's bad when you feel that you have been mis-judged.
technology would certainly help. but the rules are the same for everyone and strangely enough, it is always the same players who do not accept the referee's verdicts: fognini, rublev, kyrgios etc.. one point, in the second set as in this case, at 2-2 and not real break point, it does not affect a match . if a player is unable to accept a referee's decision, then he will never be part of the elite of players. sinner lost a tournament due to a bad decision and responded superbly. rublev is always the same and that's why despite his talent, at 27 he hasn't won anything important for a top 10 yet
There's Hawk Eye on virtually any tournament on the pro tour. They just keep the tradition of using eyesight and read the marks like our past ancestors thousands of years ago.
If Rublev wouldn't be a tennis player I could imagine him as some sort of tragic writer or philosopher. When he plays tennis you can see that something much bigger is going on. He's not just playing to win. He's constantly struggling with his inner self and the surroundings that he is a prisoner of. Playing tennis is his passion but it can't get him final satisfaction. Andrey fights hard but he's constantly confronted by the imperfections of himself and the world around him. The court, the umpire, the opponent, his own game, he can try to fight it all but at the end there won't be a perfect match no matter how hard he tries. Even if he wins the frustrations eat up all the joy. All the work is for nothing because even in a win you produce many unforced errors and a great match can still be stolen by a bad call of the umpire or a string snapping at an unfortunate moment. The other players lack the understanding of the truths that have already occupied Andrey's mind. There is no satisfaction and peace in this universe. All what is left is the struggle. Life is totally random and has no purpose. Just like a match of tennis. You can scream at the stars or the umpire, the universe doesn't care.
Stop complaining and start waiting for 2025 season which will have no line judges anymore and the hawkeye actually everywhere. ;) French want to be different
The thing is, hawkeye is installed and used. But only for television purposes. The have it, they use it. But not for that refereeing. At that point, it's just dumb.
I do sympathize with Rublev on the line call. Part of the problem here is the inevitable blurring of clay court lines with play. And in this case, I certainly can’t see that ball intersecting the “obvious” line section. The raised area to the right of the line (which appears slightly lighter and smoother than the rest of the clay) is almost certainly touched, however. Tough one.
Exactly. It's one of those markings that gets slightly lost in an already 'clayless' side of the line. Of course, the ball marking is not nice and symmetrical since you miss part of the marking but because of that you also cannot really see if the ball hit the line or not, especially if it's really close.
@@Funkytrip73 That looked clearly out to me, there is a line of surface clay brushed off just outside the sideline on the court but that is not from the ball, the actual oval of the ball impact is still visible and clearly outside the line. Umpire seems to have got that very wrong.
Bolas mas justas en pista dura han sido fuera por el ojo de halcón. Pobre Rublev...si ya sin tener razón se vuelve loco teniéndola es vergonzoso verle😮
Bad line calls happen. Most accept it and move on, others, they let it percolate. Having said that, I don't think Rublev lost the set because of that one call. He got flustered that Arnaldi gets to tee on his shots which normally does not happen. So, he started pressing and made errors.
@@yeeeaaahmayneee3808but they do! And if you think that changing that fact in anyway negates the Ops comment , you should think again. Any player who falls apart like a little girl because of a bad call , will never be the best .
@@eyko1986no, look at all the others who don’t act this way, it’s not his liveliehood. He has millions in the bank, he has no excuse to act this way other than that he is mentally week. Tennis is a sport. He’s being watched by millions around the world the fact he acts like this does really not suggest he is strong mentally
I gave the pic from 0:37 to ChatGPT 4o and it called it out, here is detailed explanation: **Why the Ball is Out: A Detailed Explanation** Upon close inspection of the provided image, several key observations confirm that the ball is out. Here is a step-by-step analysis: 1. **Position of the Ball Mark**: The ball mark is clearly visible as a dark, oval-shaped imprint on the clay surface. This mark appears entirely to the right of the white line. 2. **Examine the Sand Pattern**: Initially, it might appear that the ball touched the line due to the brushed-off appearance of the sand between the ball mark and the line. However, this brushed-off appearance can be misleading. 3. **Consistency of Sand Disturbance**: By carefully observing the entire length of the white line in the image, you can see that the sand looks similarly brushed off above and below the area near the ball mark. This indicates that the brushed-off sand is likely due to maintenance and is not specific to the ball’s impact. 4. **Visual Clarity of the Line**: The white line is clearly visible and well-defined against the clay surface. The ball mark, on the other hand, is entirely within the clay area and does not touch the white line. There is a distinct separation between the ball mark and the line, with no overlap observed. 5. **Absence of Overlapping Marks**: For a ball to be considered in, any part of the ball mark must touch the white line. In this image, there is no indication that the ball mark intersects or overlaps with the line. The visible space between the mark and the line confirms that the ball landed outside the boundary. 6. **Condition of the White Line**: Observing the white line near the ball mark, it is evident that the line is still covered with sand. If the ball had made contact with the line, it would have cleaned off the sand from that part of the line due to the impact. Since the white line remains fully covered with sand, it further indicates that the ball did not touch the line. In conclusion, based on these detailed observations, it is clear that the ball did not touch the line. The initial impression that the ball might have hit the line was influenced by the misleading appearance of the sand, which upon further scrutiny, is shown to be a consistent feature along the line rather than an indicator of contact. Therefore, the ball is out.
that was clearly out. u have to consider that from the bounce theres gonna be a micro shockwave pushing sand aside. so every ball spot has a "ring" around itself making it look like its the ball but its not
Game mostruoso, la palla viaggiava veramente tanto e lui ha gestito la situazione in maniera ineccepibile, ha comandato praticamente tutti gli scambi... e che scambi! Abbiamo tanti ragazzi bravi a tennis e lui è uno di quelli
These are NOT mental problems. This is just a way to distract your opponent. Arnaldi was playing so well that he tried to put on a scene to change the momentum of the match.
@@latenight-enjoyer6111 he didn't win a single game because Arnaldi was just the better player... you've also been tricked by Rublev's attitude that the match was all about him... guess what? it wasnt. This match was about Arnaldi playing better than him for three consecutive sets and not getting distracted by the environment and by Rublev's reactions.
why are people even complaining about that call.. there are tons of those close calls in tennis so what? Right or wrong it doesn't matter, what does matter is that Rublev got literally obliterated and that call would have changed absolutely nothing
After that Rublev won the next two points and went up 40-30 and then had advantages. He didn’t lose this game for being nervous. He just lost it. And in reality one of the reasons is just that he was stolen of a point…
@alf3071 Exactly! If you're the best, you remain number one even if they ban you from playing many tournaments, or deport you from Australia, or take away 4000 points you won on two Wimbledons, or take a few weeks as number 1 because of pandemic by freezing points, even though these weeks would be yours even if they played, so they are stolen, or disqualify you from us open.... After all of that, you are still number one and broke all the records, then you really are the best. So, well said!
This video is just a teeny example of a Rublev outburst he was throwing them throughout the match and far worse than this. Arnaldi wiped the floor with him in tactics and everything else.
I Love Rublev. He is such a nice guy, but he must control his anger inside him. He admitted that but it looks like it's getting worse instead of better. It doesn't help him to improve his game.
I have no idea why people still cling to the idea that he is a nice guy. He is the opposite of a nice guy. Any other player would do what he does on court, you would already hate him
@Stu49583 They are talking about off the court (obviously). Rublev is well liked by his peers off the court. He just struggles o control his frustration on the court it seems. He definitely needs to fix this, but it doesn't mean he is not a nice guy off the court.
@@jfr1995 He behaves despicably on the court but he is a nice guy off the court, consequently he is a nice guy. Awesome. Too bad I watch tennis players because they play tennis and not because of celeb trivia.
tbh, with this call i understand his frustration. it's pretty obvious from the camera view that the ball didn't brush the line, as that usually leaves a clear white spot.
That ball is almost one centimetre out... It's not even close. The "mark" that catches the white line is not part of the ball mark under discussion (it might be from a previous shot etc).
Rublev po prostu nie umie przegrywać. Im bardziej się denerwuje, tym bardziej psuje piłki. On faktycznie powinien coś ze sobą zrobić, bo się wykończy nerwowo.
Андрюха с такой драмой закончит свою карьеру по состоянию здоровья. 😄 Это на самом деле не смешно, когда смотришь на его лицо и офигиваешь от его эмоционального потрясения. Сердечко потом слабое будет. ))
Sinner was literally robbed of Montecarlo's semifinal on a blatantly out Tsitsipas second service. I don't know about this call - which was close enough to the line - but Sinner definitely handled it much better. Everybody wants fair and square scores, but for the time being the ability to keep your cool can make the difference. Personally I think the ball was in and I also think Rublev would have lost this match regardless.
Sinner was struggeling physicaly in his match so he probabl didnt see the point argueing about it cause he knew he would loose anyway. ON the rubleve call teh ball was clearly out, as you can see becausw the line was full with clay and if the ball had touched it a part of the line would be white
@@VaJoRo l don't think you saw the match I am talking about. But about the point of this video we can debate endlessly but it wouldn't have changed anything either way on a 2-2 score in the second set (as it would have, indeed, in Montecarlo 's, when Sinner was already ahead 3-1 and Tsistipas second service was a good 15cm out on the break point). The results stay the same, but some players are more mature than others, l must say. As much as l like Rublev he can only step up if he changes attitude.
@@fabriserraTsitsipas’ second serve was more like 7cm long which is still a lot but it remains a different situation from this one. In that case Sinner had all the time to stop and ask the umpire for an overrule, which he didn’t and thus he suffered the consequences of a wrong decision, not only from the line judge and the umpire but also himself. Here Rublev wasn’t a “victim” of anything. Maybe the French Open’s old referee system. However, here it was just him not being able to forget a controversial call
@@darkuniverse1045 yeah and after that you could see that he couldn’t play anymore due to injury. Obviously it was a bad call but I don’t think it would have changed the outcome of the match. He had enough time to protest and he didn’t do kinda his fault
Murray won 3 slams, 14 Masters 1000, 1 ATP Finals, 1 Olympic gold, 46 titles in total - all of them during peak Federer, Nadal, Djokovic era. A fit Murray would have cleaned up in this current era against the likes of Rublev.
I think in Madrid they had challenge possibilities on claycourt, with the hawkeye, why not at any 500-1000 Claycourt-tournament and of course at a Grandslam!!
It seems clear to me that the problem is not whether the ball went out or not. I'm really sorry for Rublev! I hope it doesn't suffer too many negative comments.. Spectacular Arnaldi
I usually like Rublev, but Arnaldi played incredibly well, serving very high % of great 1st services and effective seconds - defending every single ball - keeping errors to the minimum - using precision, power and variety cleverly - and, most of all, keeping his cool! Congrats
Yes Arnaldi is more light-hearted than Rublev (his nickname is "The Jester" among Italian players) but i understand Rublev's frustration with the call. Not only was he right next to it, but the mark shows absolutely indication of having touched the line. Weird decision by the umpire.
Has the whole world gone crazy? Am I the only one around here who gives a sh..t about the rules? Mark it zero! They're calling the cops man, put the piece away... Mark it zero!
@@andreihorodniceanu2406 You are wrong. It may be right that the ball is out, when there is no space betwenn, but you can't prove it (without hawk eye). And when you can't prove that a ball is out, it's in. Therefore you have the inofficial rule with the "space between"..
0:53 Rublev was right here, because if you take a look at the white has a straight clay-line there which ends between the ball's print and the whiteline. The mark of the ball is 1cm far from touching the line, it was OUT.
Однозначно аут, даже по промежутку между пятном до линией, а светлое место между пятном и линией, это не касание мяча, оно и дальше и точно такое же. Не случайно "ястребиный глаз" не был показан даже телезрителям, чтобы не порочить судью.
My friend is so fascinated with his typewriter that even when I showed him that I could change the font, design text and make multiple prints on my computer, he is still hanging on to the nostalgia of his typewriter.
I don't blame Rublev at all, the ball was clearly out with the oval of the bounce. But I feel like umpires are doing this deliberately to players like Rublev, Djokovic, Medvedev, Zverev, Kyrgios just to favourize their opponents and biggest rivals like padal, Tsitsipas, etc. So glad the hawkeye system will take place next year and there'll be none of this chaotic line judging clowning.
To be honest (and I’m Italian and support Arnaldi) the perpendicular rectangular white line seems to me like it was already there and not touched by the oval form of the ball. I would have called out. Anyway it’s not based on 1 decision that you can lose your cool.
What an absolute incompetence from the umpire. It is clear as daylight that the mark curves itself. And a mark can't curve, it's uniformly oval. the part that touches the line (and appears as being curved) as you can clearly see up above on the sideline is from the brush that cleaned the line at the beginning of the set. You would expect an umpire to know this stuff and yet they don't, and we the audiences know this stuff and we are neither paid nor are we experts in this sort of stuff. Unbelievable.
It does not matter if the ball was in or out. Take the decision of the umpire and get on with it. One point of dozens will not change the outcome of a match.
If the judge has even the slightest doubt, it should be judged as out, because even if it’s caught by a millimeter, it’s a bad hit and the ball is all behind the line and nothing reprehensible will happen here. And if it is in fact an out, but is accepted as a hit, then this is a blatant injustice. You have to choose the lesser of two evils.
They ve been so reluctant to introduce hawk eye everywhere cause tennis and other competitive sports arw way more engaging with caracters and personalities like rublev and it shines in the most dramatic and iconic moments like this one...a moment that would have been impossible to replicate and there wouldnt be that much tension with no much drama...and maybe the game of tennis is more than enough by itself... sometimes we just cannot live with things always working out perfectly and fairly.
I agree its ridiculous to not use Hawkeye, but ATP needs to do something about players breaking rackets, screaming and yelling at the umpires and in general behaving badly. Young kids watching will learn from this. Fines dont work, they need to quarenteen players instead.
if i got that right she wanted to explain to him how a tennis ball is made of mozarella and had a buldge that hit the line. judging by balls as spheres, the part of mirrored shape close to the line was indeed besides it. the tracks of the line brooms are a little confusing, but i think he made perfect sense - the ball was OUT. it was OUT :D
Im not a fan of rublev, but at 0:36 you can clearly see that its far off the line. You can see the whole mark and there is a lot of space between it and the line!
This is what happens when your parents don't say "NO"...when you are kid. Mental health is just an excuse. Over entitled kid becomes and over entitled adult. Ask Kyrgios...another one on the same level
To say he has a weak mentality only because he rages fast is a nasty judgement. Rublev is the number 6 of the world and has won some great tournaments. You wouldn’t achieve that with a weak mentality. I for myself don’t want to see robots play on the court without the slightest of emotions. That’s goes for other sports as well. It would be dead boring. Plus we’re all just humans. I enjoy seeing them cheering themselves up, raging from time to time when something‘s not going their way, celebrating when they finally get the victory. It’s part of the game. I always chuckle when I see Rublev raging, reminds me of myself in some situations. But obviously the rage goes too far when it results in insulting others.
People are being charitable by saying he behaves this way because he is mentally weak. The alternative is that he just does not care about showing good behavior or even uses his tantrums to distract the opponent.
It's just a way to distract his opponent, nothing to do with mental health or anything. Arnaldi was doing everything right, so Rublev was just waiting for his opponent's level to drop and he tried to distract him by putting on a scene with the referee and all the repertoire tennis players use all the time. Didn't work this time.
what is wrong with Rublev ? I hate watching such attitude, I would be vey unhappy sitting there as a spectator, probably I would leave a court. He is so unhappy being there, frustrated all the time, stressed. Come on man, change your job !
it was just a mini part of the ball that hit the line. a few hairs at best. i think he made the same point i saw in another comment that due to the markings besides the lines from the brooms, you can actually not see the mark of the ball. if you mirror the shape next to the line though - the outside of the ball, you can pretty clearly see that it missed the line. i dont understand how she saw anything else.
I don’t think the line call led to the break. He was up after that. He only has one game plan and unfortunately when it stops working he has nothing else to rely on.
20 year leater rolangaros when there is technology to hide the assistant referees and the indicator is still not used on the network, it is a shame for this tournament and the French
Rublev is right here. In a situation where its impossible to tell if a few pixels of the ball/mark touched the line and 99.99999999999% of the mark was obviously outside the line, the ball should OF COURSE be called out.
For those accusing Rublev did you understand what Arnaldi complained about? Rublev is a psycho, but after an obvious wrong call, she kept waiving during his serve. Even Arnaldi came to his defense and asked ump to do her waiving prior to Rublev’s serve not while he is serving. And she did it twice. That’s three times she messed with Rublev in one game. Hard not to think it’s intentional, especially when you are a nutcase like Andrey
Сегодняшним поведением на корте Рублева одно разочарование,, психоз выбивает его из игры.. Очень неспортивное поведение,да судья ошибся,но чего мусолить сопли и гримасы,уважай себя,,соберись и добивайся победы. Жаль,что Андрей позволяет себе в который раз такие истерики,некрасиво...
Rublev is correct the tennis ball mark is the oval smudge, and the other adjoining mark is going in a different direction amd isn't from.that particular shot. He is totally correct
It's part of his on-court identity, sometimes works for him and sometimes against him. He is still the same person off the court that we all love. Tennis is a f*d up game but we love it. And hate it 😂
Any time Kyrgios threw a chair, kicked a water bottle, yelled at an umpire, media and fans demanded he be banned for life. Every time Rublev does exactly those things plus self harm on court in front of kids - media says oh you poor love we can see how passionate you are. Is it something to do with the colour of his hair?
Just compare it to Krejcikova in 2021 semifinal against Sakkari. Umpire did mistake on her matchpoint, the ball from Sakkari was like 5cm out and he called it in and kept the match going. Krejcikova kept her cool and won the match for the second time. Rublev would have lost the match for sure.
![Felix "Unfair" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Oswujxm2Ag0/mqdefault.jpg)
One of the biggest tennis tournaments in the world has hawkeye readily available and yet they choose to be archaeologists examining the ball prints up close with their fingers
That's true for both players, some can handle it some can't.
@@frankg.39 its like we live in fucking stone age just bring hawkeye and dont act as detective looking for prints
Makes you wonder what kind of people enforce rules like that. Certainly not tennis fans.
It’s the tradition and it’s by choice.
archaeologists 💀🤣🤣🤣🤣
The problem is not even with wrong calls but that if there was a hawkeye eye, the player would not feel that he was unfairly judged . This would not impact the psychology so much. It's ok to miss but it's bad when you feel that you have been mis-judged.
technology would certainly help. but the rules are the same for everyone and strangely enough, it is always the same players who do not accept the referee's verdicts: fognini, rublev, kyrgios etc.. one point, in the second set as in this case, at 2-2 and not real break point, it does not affect a match . if a player is unable to accept a referee's decision, then he will never be part of the elite of players. sinner lost a tournament due to a bad decision and responded superbly. rublev is always the same and that's why despite his talent, at 27 he hasn't won anything important for a top 10 yet
There's Hawk Eye on virtually any tournament on the pro tour. They just keep the tradition of using eyesight and read the marks like our past ancestors thousands of years ago.
With close calls yeah but not with wrong calles
@@MilanAC1987 which tournament sinner lost ?
@@thomajulien7230 masters 1000 Montecarlo
If Rublev wouldn't be a tennis player I could imagine him as some sort of tragic writer or philosopher. When he plays tennis you can see that something much bigger is going on. He's not just playing to win. He's constantly struggling with his inner self and the surroundings that he is a prisoner of. Playing tennis is his passion but it can't get him final satisfaction. Andrey fights hard but he's constantly confronted by the imperfections of himself and the world around him. The court, the umpire, the opponent, his own game, he can try to fight it all but at the end there won't be a perfect match no matter how hard he tries. Even if he wins the frustrations eat up all the joy. All the work is for nothing because even in a win you produce many unforced errors and a great match can still be stolen by a bad call of the umpire or a string snapping at an unfortunate moment. The other players lack the understanding of the truths that have already occupied Andrey's mind. There is no satisfaction and peace in this universe. All what is left is the struggle. Life is totally random and has no purpose. Just like a match of tennis. You can scream at the stars or the umpire, the universe doesn't care.
😄
He's just Russian
We're all like this
You read Dostoevsky?
Haha, this comment is a masterpiece. Or its "ChatGPT; what would Jordan Peterson say about Rublev?"
Life is not random but you are right that the universe doesn't care.
You obviously didn’t meet many Russian people 😂
This is why they should just have hawkeye on clay too. Like how are you a grand slam tournament and you dont have hawkeye???
Stop complaining and start waiting for 2025 season which will have no line judges anymore and the hawkeye actually everywhere. ;) French want to be different
The thing is, hawkeye is installed and used. But only for television purposes. The have it, they use it. But not for that refereeing. At that point, it's just dumb.
@@lucasgeorg1214so was it actually in or not?
no thanks
Cry about it.
So much for Rublev’ supposed mental improvement…
it's good for TV, they prolly told him to continue doing his thing
I do sympathize with Rublev on the line call. Part of the problem here is the inevitable blurring of clay court lines with play. And in this case, I certainly can’t see that ball intersecting the “obvious” line section. The raised area to the right of the line (which appears slightly lighter and smoother than the rest of the clay) is almost certainly touched, however. Tough one.
Exactly. It's one of those markings that gets slightly lost in an already 'clayless' side of the line. Of course, the ball marking is not nice and symmetrical since you miss part of the marking but because of that you also cannot really see if the ball hit the line or not, especially if it's really close.
@@Funkytrip73 That looked clearly out to me, there is a line of surface clay brushed off just outside the sideline on the court but that is not from the ball, the actual oval of the ball impact is still visible and clearly outside the line. Umpire seems to have got that very wrong.
@@mattc3581 To me it also looked out
Bolas mas justas en pista dura han sido fuera por el ojo de halcón. Pobre Rublev...si ya sin tener razón se vuelve loco teniéndola es vergonzoso verle😮
@@mattc3581 Correct
Bad line calls happen. Most accept it and move on, others, they let it percolate.
Having said that, I don't think Rublev lost the set because of that one call. He got flustered that Arnaldi gets to tee on his shots
which normally does not happen. So, he started pressing and made errors.
They are playing for prize money. One wrong call can be the difference between winning and losing if the game is tight.
You have to live with close calls. If you cannot, you are mentally not strong enough for the elite.
But not with wrong calls.
This is their profession,the way they make their living,mistakes like these should never happen
@@yeeeaaahmayneee3808but they do! And if you think that changing that fact in anyway negates the Ops comment , you should think again. Any player who falls apart like a little girl because of a bad call , will never be the best .
Rublev has run out of chances. The guys mind is so weak. Never will be a slam contender.
@@yeeeaaahmayneee3808 how do you know it was a mistake?
Also, those "mistakes" are an integral part of their profession.
Hate to say it. But rublev is mentally very very weak
Put his shoes on, go and play, then reflect...
@@eyko1986exactly, well said.
Nothing new under the sun.
Same but I'm perfectly happy to say it
@@eyko1986no, look at all the others who don’t act this way, it’s not his liveliehood. He has millions in the bank, he has no excuse to act this way other than that he is mentally week. Tennis is a sport. He’s being watched by millions around the world the fact he acts like this does really not suggest he is strong mentally
At 0:37 it's clear as day that ball is out. Just imagine drawing an ellipse on that shape. Impossible for it to be in.
Plus the fact they didn't show the hawk eye... when judge is correct they show it.
I gave the pic from 0:37 to ChatGPT 4o and it called it out, here is detailed explanation:
**Why the Ball is Out: A Detailed Explanation**
Upon close inspection of the provided image, several key observations confirm that the ball is out. Here is a step-by-step analysis:
1. **Position of the Ball Mark**: The ball mark is clearly visible as a dark, oval-shaped imprint on the clay surface. This mark appears entirely to the right of the white line.
2. **Examine the Sand Pattern**: Initially, it might appear that the ball touched the line due to the brushed-off appearance of the sand between the ball mark and the line. However, this brushed-off appearance can be misleading.
3. **Consistency of Sand Disturbance**: By carefully observing the entire length of the white line in the image, you can see that the sand looks similarly brushed off above and below the area near the ball mark. This indicates that the brushed-off sand is likely due to maintenance and is not specific to the ball’s impact.
4. **Visual Clarity of the Line**: The white line is clearly visible and well-defined against the clay surface. The ball mark, on the other hand, is entirely within the clay area and does not touch the white line. There is a distinct separation between the ball mark and the line, with no overlap observed.
5. **Absence of Overlapping Marks**: For a ball to be considered in, any part of the ball mark must touch the white line. In this image, there is no indication that the ball mark intersects or overlaps with the line. The visible space between the mark and the line confirms that the ball landed outside the boundary.
6. **Condition of the White Line**: Observing the white line near the ball mark, it is evident that the line is still covered with sand. If the ball had made contact with the line, it would have cleaned off the sand from that part of the line due to the impact. Since the white line remains fully covered with sand, it further indicates that the ball did not touch the line.
In conclusion, based on these detailed observations, it is clear that the ball did not touch the line. The initial impression that the ball might have hit the line was influenced by the misleading appearance of the sand, which upon further scrutiny, is shown to be a consistent feature along the line rather than an indicator of contact.
Therefore, the ball is out.
@@just2sharethey often show the mark even when the umpire made a mistake
come on, it was an inconsequential point, he went in advance immediately. ANdrei needs a phycological treatment. NOW.
that was clearly out. u have to consider that from the bounce theres gonna be a micro shockwave pushing sand aside. so every ball spot has a "ring" around itself making it look like its the ball but its not
Nessun commento sulla grande prestazione di Arnaldi.
Avete il prosciutto sugli occhi?
lui è grandissimo
Eccezionale 🇮🇹🏆
Game mostruoso, la palla viaggiava veramente tanto e lui ha gestito la situazione in maniera ineccepibile, ha comandato praticamente tutti gli scambi... e che scambi!
Abbiamo tanti ragazzi bravi a tennis e lui è uno di quelli
Ma appunto! Pessimo Rublev comunque, che cambi sport..
Becauae the video is about Rublevs weak mind. Cant perform when going bad
Rublev needs to sort out his mental problems
Hope not, makes great TV.
These are NOT mental problems. This is just a way to distract your opponent. Arnaldi was playing so well that he tried to put on a scene to change the momentum of the match.
@@davidmartell1525 :))
@@milvao3400 Yeah that's why he did not win a single game in this set after he "faked" being upset
@@latenight-enjoyer6111 he didn't win a single game because Arnaldi was just the better player... you've also been tricked by Rublev's attitude that the match was all about him... guess what? it wasnt. This match was about Arnaldi playing better than him for three consecutive sets and not getting distracted by the environment and by Rublev's reactions.
why are people even complaining about that call.. there are tons of those close calls in tennis so what? Right or wrong it doesn't matter, what does matter is that Rublev got literally obliterated and that call would have changed absolutely nothing
exactly, if you're the best you win even with 10 stolen points
After that Rublev won the next two points and went up 40-30 and then had advantages. He didn’t lose this game for being nervous. He just lost it. And in reality one of the reasons is just that he was stolen of a point…
@alf3071 Exactly! If you're the best, you remain number one even if they ban you from playing many tournaments, or deport you from Australia, or take away 4000 points you won on two Wimbledons, or take a few weeks as number 1 because of pandemic by freezing points, even though these weeks would be yours even if they played, so they are stolen, or disqualify you from us open.... After all of that, you are still number one and broke all the records, then you really are the best. So, well said!
That call can absolutely change a lot lmao
to be fair, THE BALL WAS OUT
the trace, shadow, impact however you want to call it, is symmetrical and it couldn't have touched the line..
This video is just a teeny example of a Rublev outburst he was throwing them throughout the match and far worse than this. Arnaldi wiped the floor with him in tactics and everything else.
Rublevs mental issiues seems getting worse. He is acting like a psycho.
I Love Rublev. He is such a nice guy, but he must control his anger inside him. He admitted that but it looks like it's getting worse instead of better. It doesn't help him to improve his game.
I have no idea why people still cling to the idea that he is a nice guy. He is the opposite of a nice guy. Any other player would do what he does on court, you would already hate him
@Stu49583 They are talking about off the court (obviously). Rublev is well liked by his peers off the court. He just struggles o control his frustration on the court it seems. He definitely needs to fix this, but it doesn't mean he is not a nice guy off the court.
@@jfr1995 He behaves despicably on the court but he is a nice guy off the court, consequently he is a nice guy. Awesome. Too bad I watch tennis players because they play tennis and not because of celeb trivia.
Not a nice guy at all.
It's easy to be a "nice guy" in interviews.
It's easy to see his true character on the court.
tbh, with this call i understand his frustration. it's pretty obvious from the camera view that the ball didn't brush the line, as that usually leaves a clear white spot.
That ball is almost one centimetre out... It's not even close. The "mark" that catches the white line is not part of the ball mark under discussion (it might be from a previous shot etc).
it's in
Even if it was out - if he plays the exact same shot, it will be given in. What's the problem? I'd be much more angry about a double-fault than this.
That first call is a joke. Clearly out... Imagine being a full time tennis referee and effing that up
One of the worst umpire!!! Im very suprised she is still manage to umpire matches like this!!
Anyone who knows tennis sees the ball was definitely out
Vallo a dire a Sinner Che ha perso Montecarlo per una chiamata sbagliata
@@Cucciolotti2024 im a sinner fan but what has that to do with this rublev situation
It wasn't definitely out. It might have been out or in since it was quite hard to tell, but you're delusional if you think that was "definitely" out.
@@tijgertjekonijnwordopgegeten it's out.
99% it was out. The shape of the ball's bounce would have curved inwards before the line, so its out
Why is he so goddamn angry all the time, it is actually really annoying to watch his matches because of his anger.
Rublev po prostu nie umie przegrywać. Im bardziej się denerwuje, tym bardziej psuje piłki. On faktycznie powinien coś ze sobą zrobić, bo się wykończy nerwowo.
@@barbarai6361no nie wiem, moim zdaniem Drewniany po prostu jest bananem, stąd wynika jego zachowanie
Everyone talking about the ball call, but the issue here is Rublev's attitude, absolutely horrendous, he needs to check a psychiatrist asap!
He is probably doing it already
it's just tactics to distract his opponent, not an actual mental issue
@@milvao3400come on man. Rublev is sick in head
That ball is out, because of the angle it isn't touching the line
It touches the line, you can clearly see it!!! If it didnt you would see a gap.
@@fabrizziolevoni849 sand is on the line. if the ball would have hit the line, it would be clean. basic science actually.
The ball is clearly not touching the line; it is the sand that has spread from the impact and is touching the line.
it's in
Its in@@juhlad
Grandissimo Arnaldi
Андрюха с такой драмой закончит свою карьеру по состоянию здоровья. 😄 Это на самом деле не смешно, когда смотришь на его лицо и офигиваешь от его эмоционального потрясения. Сердечко потом слабое будет. ))
Sinner was literally robbed of Montecarlo's semifinal on a blatantly out Tsitsipas second service. I don't know about this call - which was close enough to the line - but Sinner definitely handled it much better. Everybody wants fair and square scores, but for the time being the ability to keep your cool can make the difference. Personally I think the ball was in and I also think Rublev would have lost this match regardless.
Sinner was struggeling physicaly in his match so he probabl didnt see the point argueing about it cause he knew he would loose anyway. ON the rubleve call teh ball was clearly out, as you can see becausw the line was full with clay and if the ball had touched it a part of the line would be white
@@VaJoRo l don't think you saw the match I am talking about. But about the point of this video we can debate endlessly but it wouldn't have changed anything either way on a 2-2 score in the second set (as it would have, indeed, in Montecarlo 's, when Sinner was already ahead 3-1 and Tsistipas second service was a good 15cm out on the break point).
The results stay the same, but some players are more mature than others, l must say. As much as l like Rublev he can only step up if he changes attitude.
@@fabriserraTsitsipas’ second serve was more like 7cm long which is still a lot but it remains a different situation from this one. In that case Sinner had all the time to stop and ask the umpire for an overrule, which he didn’t and thus he suffered the consequences of a wrong decision, not only from the line judge and the umpire but also himself. Here Rublev wasn’t a “victim” of anything. Maybe the French Open’s old referee system. However, here it was just him not being able to forget a controversial call
Sinner was not robbed of anything. One break up doesn’t mean much. Sinner had a negative h2h against Tsitsipas.
@@darkuniverse1045 yeah and after that you could see that he couldn’t play anymore due to injury. Obviously it was a bad call but I don’t think it would have changed the outcome of the match. He had enough time to protest and he didn’t do kinda his fault
Rublev has a mental strength of Andy Murray
Murray won 3 slams, 14 Masters 1000, 1 ATP Finals, 1 Olympic gold, 46 titles in total - all of them during peak Federer, Nadal, Djokovic era. A fit Murray would have cleaned up in this current era against the likes of Rublev.
@@MrPicklerwoof Actually 2 Olympic golds (he defended his London gold with Rio) and no other player EVER has done that and probably won´t again :)
*Nick Kyrgios
Marin Cilic
Murray was whinier
I think in Madrid they had challenge possibilities on claycourt, with the hawkeye, why not at any 500-1000 Claycourt-tournament and of course at a Grandslam!!
Tradition.
Wow this ball is 100% out what a shame an umpire can't see a mark of a ball, in a Grand Slam Tournament 🙈🙈🙈
dentro o fuori ...non era una palla determinante in quel momento, perdere la calma l'ha solo "aiutato" a perdere il turno di servizio
absolute disgracefull call. It's clearly out
Grand slam with no technology is absurd
I love how calm and focussed Rublev is. Mentality is definitely his strong point.
It seems clear to me that the problem is not whether the ball went out or not. I'm really sorry for Rublev! I hope it doesn't suffer too many negative comments.. Spectacular Arnaldi
С первых ударов было ясно , что Рублев проиграет
I usually like Rublev, but Arnaldi played incredibly well, serving very high % of great 1st services and effective seconds - defending every single ball - keeping errors to the minimum - using precision, power and variety cleverly - and, most of all, keeping his cool! Congrats
Why this blind person is still on the umpire? She messed up so many matches before.
Rubleb upset for being called pollo (chicken) by his coach 😂😂😂😂😂😅😢
Вечно можно смотреть на три вещи на воду огонь и как рубикджан психует на корте...это потрясающее зрелище бесподобное!))
French Open needs to get with the times and use Hawkeye.
Yes Arnaldi is more light-hearted than Rublev (his nickname is "The Jester" among Italian players) but i understand Rublev's frustration with the call. Not only was he right next to it, but the mark shows absolutely indication of having touched the line. Weird decision by the umpire.
Has the whole world gone crazy? Am I the only one around here who gives a sh..t about the rules? Mark it zero!
They're calling the cops man, put the piece away...
Mark it zero!
I hope Rublev takes an anger management crash course before the next GS, He is a good player
I don't know why people are complaining. The ball clearly has to be called in because there is no space between mark and line!
it is, just becouse you don t see it, doesn t mean its isn t, you can see the full shape of the ball outside the line
@@andreihorodniceanu2406 You are wrong. It may be right that the ball is out, when there is no space betwenn, but you can't prove it (without hawk eye). And when you can't prove that a ball is out, it's in. Therefore you have the inofficial rule with the "space between"..
0:53 Rublev was right here, because if you take a look at the white has a straight clay-line there which ends between the ball's print and the whiteline. The mark of the ball is 1cm far from touching the line, it was OUT.
Рублев это отвратительно. Надо лечиться,и не играть в теннис. Это происходит на каждом турнире. Мне неловко за вас...
eres ukrainazi?
@@АннаВласенко-э6е И,вам следует подлечиться срочно,можете с Рублевым вместе, если пересечетесь...
Rublev is such a humble, nice guy. It's a shame that people could have a wrong image of him by watching these moments when he loses control.
it didnt catch the line
ball was good
it did
Однозначно аут, даже по промежутку между пятном до линией, а светлое место между пятном и линией, это не касание мяча, оно и дальше и точно такое же. Не случайно "ястребиный глаз" не был показан даже телезрителям, чтобы не порочить судью.
My friend is so fascinated with his typewriter that even when I showed him that I could change the font, design text and make multiple prints on my computer, he is still hanging on to the nostalgia of his typewriter.
Андрей превращает в драму любой спорный эпизод. Это выглядит глупо, мелочно и приводит к ужасным последствиям.
I don't blame Rublev at all, the ball was clearly out with the oval of the bounce. But I feel like umpires are doing this deliberately to players like Rublev, Djokovic, Medvedev, Zverev, Kyrgios just to favourize their opponents and biggest rivals like padal, Tsitsipas, etc. So glad the hawkeye system will take place next year and there'll be none of this chaotic line judging clowning.
Padal?
Oh yea. Sure they are. 😂
8:27 the moment he was waiting for, a complete explosion of emotions 😂
Sempre un grande autocontrollo Rublev
sei un grande... 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Bravo Arnaldi, bravo👏👏
To be honest (and I’m Italian and support Arnaldi) the perpendicular rectangular white line seems to me like it was already there and not touched by the oval form of the ball. I would have called out.
Anyway it’s not based on 1 decision that you can lose your cool.
What an absolute incompetence from the umpire. It is clear as daylight that the mark curves itself. And a mark can't curve, it's uniformly oval. the part that touches the line (and appears as being curved) as you can clearly see up above on the sideline is from the brush that cleaned the line at the beginning of the set. You would expect an umpire to know this stuff and yet they don't, and we the audiences know this stuff and we are neither paid nor are we experts in this sort of stuff. Unbelievable.
its just logical in this case actually. if the line is not clean at this exact point, the ball never touched it.
it's in
First ball was clearly out, the mark didn't touch the line, the umpire should ve done better there
It does not matter if the ball was in or out. Take the decision of the umpire and get on with it. One point of dozens will not change the outcome of a match.
If the judge has even the slightest doubt, it should be judged as out, because even if it’s caught by a millimeter, it’s a bad hit and the ball is all behind the line and nothing reprehensible will happen here. And if it is in fact an out, but is accepted as a hit, then this is a blatant injustice. You have to choose the lesser of two evils.
Rublev needs to change his team. Shouldn't let one point mess with his head!
They ve been so reluctant to introduce hawk eye everywhere cause tennis and other competitive sports arw way more engaging with caracters and personalities like rublev and it shines in the most dramatic and iconic moments like this one...a moment that would have been impossible to replicate and there wouldnt be that much tension with no much drama...and maybe the game of tennis is more than enough by itself... sometimes we just cannot live with things always working out perfectly and fairly.
I agree its ridiculous to not use Hawkeye, but ATP needs to do something about players breaking rackets, screaming and yelling at the umpires and in general behaving badly. Young kids watching will learn from this. Fines dont work, they need to quarenteen players instead.
if i got that right she wanted to explain to him how a tennis ball is made of mozarella and had a buldge that hit the line. judging by balls as spheres, the part of mirrored shape close to the line was indeed besides it. the tracks of the line brooms are a little confusing, but i think he made perfect sense - the ball was OUT.
it was OUT :D
Im not a fan of rublev, but at 0:36 you can clearly see that its far off the line. You can see the whole mark and there is a lot of space between it and the line!
Imagine not having the hawkeye in 2024. XD
This is what happens when your parents don't say "NO"...when you are kid. Mental health is just an excuse. Over entitled kid becomes and over entitled adult. Ask Kyrgios...another one on the same level
I do have to say, it went out. Like when I was seeing it I really got shocked of how blind the ref was saying it was in.😮
He reminds me to zverev 4-5 years ago...same mental problems, but today he chills and plays incredible good.
FO needs to incorporate hawkeye. It's not fair on the players. 😮
To say he has a weak mentality only because he rages fast is a nasty judgement. Rublev is the number 6 of the world and has won some great tournaments. You wouldn’t achieve that with a weak mentality. I for myself don’t want to see robots play on the court without the slightest of emotions. That’s goes for other sports as well. It would be dead boring. Plus we’re all just humans. I enjoy seeing them cheering themselves up, raging from time to time when something‘s not going their way, celebrating when they finally get the victory. It’s part of the game. I always chuckle when I see Rublev raging, reminds me of myself in some situations. But obviously the rage goes too far when it results in insulting others.
People are being charitable by saying he behaves this way because he is mentally weak. The alternative is that he just does not care about showing good behavior or even uses his tantrums to distract the opponent.
Не стоило так прям расстраиваться! Нервы ведь нужны для выиграть👉🏻 а не разбаланса!
I think vicar amelia during the transformation cutscene is also a good one
No doubt, Rublev looks like a moody ballerina.
the line is completely covered by dust... so it was out
It's just a way to distract his opponent, nothing to do with mental health or anything. Arnaldi was doing everything right, so Rublev was just waiting for his opponent's level to drop and he tried to distract him by putting on a scene with the referee and all the repertoire tennis players use all the time. Didn't work this time.
The ball is clearly out poor Rublev
don't seems so
ball seems in
it's in
Its in
what is wrong with Rublev ? I hate watching such attitude, I would be vey unhappy sitting there as a spectator, probably I would leave a court.
He is so unhappy being there, frustrated all the time, stressed. Come on man, change your job !
What other job would he do?☺
The ball was out. The ref considered the parallel to the line clean clay as part of the mark but of course she is wrong.
The ball is clearly out.
He is his worst enemy at this point...
The line is full with sand after he hit the shot there is no way she said it is in, the line would be white where the ball hit it
False. The rule is if there is no space between mark and line it is in, so the line does not necessary be white
it was just a mini part of the ball that hit the line. a few hairs at best. i think he made the same point i saw in another comment that due to the markings besides the lines from the brooms, you can actually not see the mark of the ball. if you mirror the shape next to the line though - the outside of the ball, you can pretty clearly see that it missed the line. i dont understand how she saw anything else.
I don’t think the line call led to the break. He was up after that. He only has one game plan and unfortunately when it stops working he has nothing else to rely on.
20 year leater rolangaros
when there is technology to hide the assistant referees and the indicator is still not used on the network, it is a shame for this tournament and the French
0:22 Ball was completely out, tf is the umpire even looking at
2nd set was the decisive one for Rublev. He actually lost the match at this point as he never calmed down after that.
He was totally outplayed from start to finish, what match did u watch? 😂
@@maxdgr I've watched a match where Rublev had a nervous breakdown for 2 sets. It's his fault, but it is what it is.
Rublev is right here. In a situation where its impossible to tell if a few pixels of the ball/mark touched the line and 99.99999999999% of the mark was obviously outside the line, the ball should OF COURSE be called out.
He needs Iga's Mental health coach
amazing playing by Arnaldi
He has to start realising that the opponent is playing better than him and has to accept it.
When we were kids, we’d call this spazzing out. But we were just kids, not grown professionals tennis players.
For those accusing Rublev did you understand what Arnaldi complained about? Rublev is a psycho, but after an obvious wrong call, she kept waiving during his serve. Even Arnaldi came to his defense and asked ump to do her waiving prior to Rublev’s serve not while he is serving. And she did it twice. That’s three times she messed with Rublev in one game. Hard not to think it’s intentional, especially when you are a nutcase like Andrey
Andrey, it can happen. You are human too. Move on, there is a next Grand Slam tournament.
Сегодняшним поведением на корте Рублева одно разочарование,, психоз выбивает его из игры..
Очень неспортивное поведение,да судья ошибся,но чего мусолить сопли и гримасы,уважай себя,,соберись и добивайся победы.
Жаль,что Андрей позволяет себе в который раз такие истерики,некрасиво...
Rublev is correct the tennis ball mark is the oval smudge, and the other adjoining mark is going in a different direction amd isn't from.that particular shot. He is totally correct
It's part of his on-court identity, sometimes works for him and sometimes against him. He is still the same person off the court that we all love.
Tennis is a f*d up game but we love it. And hate it 😂
its out
Any time Kyrgios threw a chair, kicked a water bottle, yelled at an umpire, media and fans demanded he be banned for life. Every time Rublev does exactly those things plus self harm on court in front of kids - media says oh you poor love we can see how passionate you are. Is it something to do with the colour of his hair?
Rublev always gets mad! 😂😂
Just compare it to Krejcikova in 2021 semifinal against Sakkari. Umpire did mistake on her matchpoint, the ball from Sakkari was like 5cm out and he called it in and kept the match going. Krejcikova kept her cool and won the match for the second time. Rublev would have lost the match for sure.