@@danadowning2065 I don't watch the news (or tv) but maybe once a week. Just to many commercials trying to brainwash you and too much negativity! I pay $10 a month to RUclips & watch what I want, when I want, with no commercials!
You should live stream. You’re such a mysterious man! I bet your viewers would love to interact with you more. Thanks for the consistent, super entertaining, and informative content!
I can already read the clickbait ads once they hear about this.. “Our Milky Way galaxy has a Thicc Disk, and here’s the reasons you should be concerned, #7 is all the proof you need.” As usual though awesome video, just had to make a funny.
I thought that Anton had said in a recent video that brown dwarves were essentially invisible and could only be detected by rare forms of occlusion. .......
What if it is the core of a gas giant that has lost all its gas..? Being that close to its host star, and the age, this could explain it. Jupiter and Saturn are theorized to have ultra-dense metallic cores right? So, just a guess, but it would be very exotic material, having been crushed and compressed at the heart of a gas giant and then stripped naked !!!
Yep. We all heard him say that too. What? Pretending you're just smart and didn't watch the video? Just came up with that, eh? Okay, here's your pay off: WOW! YOU ARE SO BRILLIANT!
I don't get this. 7G doesn't sound like enough gravity to hold solid matter in a neutron star state, if it were only the core the rest would fall in and be crushed down to Neutron Star density, solid matter can't be compressed. Is there some unknown state between solid and neutron soup ?. Like only the outermost electron shell being crushed ?.
Have to give Anton some props for eloquently delivering the phrase "thick disk", in contrast to most news bloopers on RUclips where Freudian slips are common
First, what is the uncertainty on that density estimate? Second, what assumptions allow the estimate? I'm not ready to believe in a planet more dense than osmium without some serious justification.
Anton, the paper gave 4.5 +/- 1.5 Earth masses as weight. Only stated 8.2 masses as the 3-sigma upper bound. Which is well within standard tungsten's density, even before we consider gravimetric compression.
Sorry, but the density as reported by Anton is incorrect. From the paper: "It has a radius of RP = 1.088 ± 0.064 R⊕ and a mass of MP = 4.2 ± 1.5 M⊕." This means a density of about 3.26 times Earth (around 18 g/cm^3), which is still very high, but does not require some strange form of matter that a density of 37 would require.
This is what I found too. I also recalculated the density for 4.2 earth masses. I got about 18 g/cm^3 also and 3.5 times Earth's surface gravity. Glad someone can confirm that. I still think this demands extraordinary explanation. It beats so many heavy elements in density that were just so rare 10 billion years ago. Not to mention having such an abundance of heavy elements coalesce into a planet nowadays seems exceptional. But I am not a physicist of planetary formation so I could be wrong about that. Just with the timescale it took to collect such heavy elements doesn't seem to add up to me. But whether its a new material or an oddly early collection of heavy elements there is definitely something strange going on over there.
Okay, so we have 1. Dwarf planets, 2. Small planets close to their stars with no atmospheres like Mercury, 3. Hellish Venus like planets, 4. Terrestrial earth like planets, 5. Snowball planets like earth was in the past, 6. Water worlds like earth may have been in the past, 7. Dense planets, 8. Super terrestrial planets, 9. Neptune like planets, 10. Uranus like planets, 11. Saturn like planets, 12. Jupiter like planets, 13. Hot Jupiters, 14. Super Jupiter’s, 15. Diamond raining planets, and 16. Molten rock raining planets. There are also some icy moons with liquid oceans and maybe some terrestrial moons orbiting gas giants in the habitable zone. I wonder what will get added to this list.
@Tellestus 0 you have not your LOGIC , you have only what the ather peaple serves you. WOTHER NEVER CAN'T STAY VERTICALLY, WE EVEN HAVE NOT OLL MAP OF ANTARCTIC, YOU NO WAY, BECAUSE THE EARTH IS FLAT , BECAUSE ANTARCTIC IS OL AROUND EARTH.
@Thomas Chrombly the TRUTH is onli in rech secret elita. They don't want to know every body the truth . Think about ANTARCTIC , nobody knows the ol maps of ANTARCTIC. And mor , and mor secret have this earth , and they brush auer mind with ather Planet's, NATHING TRUE
"oh my god, i was wrong, it was math, all along, you've finally made a mathmatician(yes you finally made a mathmatician), you finally. made. a. mathmatician. of meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee. I LOVE YOU DOCTOR ZAIANTON!"
7:25 This planet's density is 37g per cubic centimeter which is denser than the densest element found on Earth, which is Osmium a Platinum group metal that is only 22g per cubic centimeter ?!?!? As a comparison Lead only weighs 11.342 gram per cubic centimeter. So what the heck is this planet made out of???? Whatever it is, it does NOT exist on Earth!!!!
It could be something as simple as iron (though in a very strange and interesting form). Osmium is 22g per cubic centimeter when it is subjected to 1 atmosphere of pressure at 0 degrees celsius. But it (like all materials) become denser at higher pressures (such as the pressures of 8 earths sitting on top of it). It's a relatively boring explanation but it seems like the most likely one to me.
@Dominic H. I profoundly disagree with your first sentence. I can't see what you mean by the second. I'm British (you haven't told us your nationality or native language, so we can't judge your expertise) and approaching 60 years old (both factors may be significant). To my ear, "he's a so-called footballer" would be said about an actual footballer, but the speaker is implying that he's rubbish (in other words: you might call him a footballer, but he isn't one really). In that usage, "so-called" means that's the name, but it isn't true. I also disagree with @Alan W - the speaker is asserting that it really, really isn't what the name says. Not that there is "some doubt". There is no debate: it just isn't true. Usually, of course, this is just in the opinion of the speaker so debate may genuinely be appropriate. Anyway, calling the galactic halo "the so-called galactic halo" sounds incredibly odd to a native english speaker when you know the galactic halo *is* the galactic halo. I wouldn't say of a piece of cheese "here is a so-called piece of cheese". I might say it of a rancid lump of month-old milk.
Your videos and delivery dazzle me. How scientists figure it out is even more astounding. We're such a smart and stupid society all at once. Stay safe, be well.
I wish society would stop looking down at their phones and look up at their amazing skies!! I often wonder how light pollution affects the viewpoints of people. I feel like if more people saw truly dark sky they would have a better perspective on life, in a society where people are only focused on work and money,they would probably subscribe to Anton! Have a great day and a starry night wonderful people!
MadAtreides1 That’s very unfortunate. I live in Florida under Bortle class 7 skies but I can still venture out into the Florida country side to get a decent view of the galactic plane during the summer. The skies are actually quite nice but not as good as it could be. People are slowly forgetting about their home among the stars, and their home among galaxies. I’m often baffled by the responses I get from people when I talk about space. No one seems to know what I’m talking about, and no one seems to care. I thinks that’s because those people have never yet had the chance to see the night sky how it’s supposed to look. Seeing it gives you a feeling of connection with the universe and helps you realize what’s important, which in my opinion is loving other people.
I appreciate that English isn't your first language - Just a heads-up, the expression 'so called' is commonly usually used when you are sceptical about something. As in 'so called perpetual motion'. Very interesting video, thanks.
Hey, as a non-native english speaker too that was good to know, thanks for the heads-up! What's the right way to convey that there's some specific term an object or phenomena is known as then? a.k.a (also known as)?
@@randomnamechannel9813 A hard term would be something like "designated as' And then the name. If the object had a second, informal name, it is good to include that afterwards. Personally, I would introduce an object with its technical name, then the informal name, and then refer to it by the informal name. (Unless you want the formal name to be learned by your viewers.) For example: "The star designated as HD102956 is also known as Aniara. Aniara is the... blah blah blah" This introduces the formal designation, but promotes the informal name for easy usage. You can do it the other way round though and promote the formal name. Best for classroom teaching I think. I am no expert though, so take this with a large pinch of salt!
that dense planet is probably the remnant core of a hot jovian that has had its light elements stripped by its original star going supernova, lol snap... you got it too
@@FreeAmerica4Ever what can I say, I'm just a genius 🤣 (Socrates: “I know that I know nothing”/ Albert Einstein: “The more I learn, the more I realize how much I don't know.”) *cough*... 😂
Yes. However, the thick disc has many times more volume, and several times the mass. Theoretically much of this mass is "dark matter", an unproven theory I believe to be inaccurate. I believe dark matter and dark energy to be 'placeholder' theories that fill in gaps while we figure out what is actually going on.
These sort of planets would usually be expected to be short lived and bounce back from that ultradense state once all of the other layers pressing them down had been stripped away. If it's a long lived object this implies that the pressure in the core of gas giants can create metastable ultradense materials. If this is true then it's potentially possible to create them on Earth in the lab by applying enough pressure in a diamond anvil or with lasers.
So, what do you think, Anton, maybe a planet that has soaked up dark matter like a sponge? Or maybe the remnants of another old star that wasn't quite big enough to become a neutron star, maybe an iron star.
Maybe explains what i saw last nite the sky Australia 9:28pm ...took photos on my phone dense moon like appearance was perfect ring being cloudy and all wasnt easy to spot ....for a sec ...uh oh ! but feeling excited now bout this vid close but bloody huge !
No. 37 grams\cc is more then 3 times the density of lead. It must be some form of matter we are unfamiliar with, perhaps degenerate matter overlain with normal matter accumulated over billions of years.
Could this possibly be an ancient gas giant that has lost its atmosphere being so close to it's star? Wow! You just answered it. Lol! Great minds think alike. :) I was typing this as I was watching.
from breaking down the spectrum of light, i think the frequencies etc - elements give off a very specific light spectrum frequency pretty sure thats right
This is a good a point. I think that there will be some exomoons or even binary planets that could throw us some curve balls in the future. Although this might be a bad example of that. It's really close to it's host star which means moons orbiting the planet become incredibly unstable. And comets wouldn't have any noticeable effect on the star. The mass of a planet is often measured by how it's gravity slightly effects the parent star.
oh shit, that's really interesting. i wonder if there are more metals in those nodes of stability that might exist. or if it's like metallic hydrogen or something in a very dense crystalline form that doesn't exist on earth. i wonder if it's the core of a star that went supernova, but wasn't dense enough to make a neutron star
How certain are we on these density measurements? I mean this is absolutely crazy, how the hell would have this thing formed. What do we presume it is composed of? These are not test questions I’m just really fascinated immediately lol
We discovered the planet using the transit method which means we probably have a decent idea of it's diameter. With the diameter and then you can calculate the volume of a sphere. Then mass/volume is the density. The big question mark is how they detected the mass. All of the sources I have read about this say that it is
Could it be the partial remnants of a star, more specifically a different type of failed star? Or made of parts of such a star? A new variation on a Brown Star? Although the Jupiter type theory seems closest, due to size and mass.
Relatively, a red dwarf sun at the age of only 10 billion years, is just a youngling :) Also again the Universe surprises us with this planetary discovery :)
Anton loves saying "also" and "so called." I absolutely love his content and delivery.
Damn you're right. Also "Some Scientists'
And it's "also" a coronavirus free zone. Sorry for even mentioning it, I'm sure everyone else here needs a break from the "so called" news.
Also adverbs. Ie relatively...
I laugh every time he says *thic* disc
@@danadowning2065 I don't watch the news (or tv) but maybe once a week. Just to many commercials trying to brainwash you and too much negativity! I pay $10 a month to RUclips & watch what I want, when I want, with no commercials!
You should live stream. You’re such a mysterious man! I bet your viewers would love to interact with you more. Thanks for the consistent, super entertaining, and informative content!
"The gravity is 7 times higher than on earth, probably not the best planet to go to if you want to lose some weight" LOL! 🤣
Your head would pop
Or if you want to lose it.
Heart needs to work much harder to pump blood to the head.
I think somebody should check their math. . .
With that much weight you'd be glued to the planet, unable to move.
Seems to me that the graphics you're using for all these objects and galaxies keeps getting sharper and more detailed. Very nice!
I can already read the clickbait ads once they hear about this.. “Our Milky Way galaxy has a Thicc Disk, and here’s the reasons you should be concerned, #7 is all the proof you need.”
As usual though awesome video, just had to make a funny.
Internet Explorer ☆ You did it well!
I've been watching since you had 30k subs and your vids have still been great
Expected Discovery: Ultra-Dense People Going to Bars and Sharing Shots
RDE Lutherie Can confirm. I’ve lived in some large cities where the population was unusually dense. 😜
And dancing to Top 40 music
.
@RDE Lutherie "Earth/Gaia/পৃথিবী is a ultra dense planet already" - An ultra dense perosn from 2020.
Man In The Hills ☆ Is "Top 40" still a Thing?
Hope your staying healthy Anton! Best wishes from the state's
Your channel to me is like StarTrek, imaginations about the universe, which is what modern astronomy seems to mostly be nowadays :D
I bet it's the core of a gas giant, perhaps even a brown dwarf that has had it's atmosphere blown off.
Just what I was thinking. Seems like a likely explanation!
Eric Taylor ☆ Or possibly never had an atmosphere as the other Gas Giants took it all.
Living on the Poverty Edge.
Could this be the first find of a hypothetical so-called black dwarf?
@@paavobergmann4920 no black dwarves with only occur trillions of years from now from a decayed white dwarf
I thought that Anton had said in a recent video that brown dwarves were essentially invisible and could only be detected by rare forms of occlusion.
.......
I love this channel. Cheers me up every day
What if it is the core of a gas giant that has lost all its gas..? Being that close to its host star, and the age, this could explain it. Jupiter and Saturn are theorized to have ultra-dense metallic cores right? So, just a guess, but it would be very exotic material, having been crushed and compressed at the heart of a gas giant and then stripped naked !!!
Yes, that is what he said.
Elements in the ??? portion of the periodic table of elements
Yep. We all heard him say that too. What? Pretending you're just smart and didn't watch the video? Just came up with that, eh? Okay, here's your pay off: WOW! YOU ARE SO BRILLIANT!
I don't get this. 7G doesn't sound like enough gravity to hold solid matter in a neutron star state, if it were only the core the rest would fall in and be crushed down to Neutron Star density, solid matter can't be compressed. Is there some unknown state between solid and neutron soup ?. Like only the outermost electron shell being crushed ?.
@@sciencetroll6304 There are White Dwarves, Electron Degeneracy pressure.
Anton: our galaxy is curved, like a wobbly disk.
Me: amazed
Heidi M
I see it like a Pringle 🤪
Someone stepped on it... 😉
Dude, another consistent, meaningful upload...
Youre going to socially become a youtube god before long
Like mrpete222!!!!
Like who?
I'd like to know more about the study as I am skeptical about the density.
A planet with high surface gravity, made of exotic material, orbiting a red star...
If it explodes, we know its name: Krypton.
Have to give Anton some props for eloquently delivering the phrase "thick disk", in contrast to most news bloopers on RUclips where Freudian slips are common
I like the way he explains. He just gets to the point.
First, what is the uncertainty on that density estimate? Second, what assumptions allow the estimate? I'm not ready to believe in a planet more dense than osmium without some serious justification.
Anton, the paper gave 4.5 +/- 1.5 Earth masses as weight. Only stated 8.2 masses as the 3-sigma upper bound. Which is well within standard tungsten's density, even before we consider gravimetric compression.
i love his accent
it has inspired a new drinking game:
take a drink every time he says "a lot"
you should be inspired by the drinking games of his people =DDD
Good thing I stopped drinking "a lot" , or I'd be smashed.
You might get more wasted if the word was “relatively”.
@Thomas Chrombly I believe in miracles.
@@VarroTigurius-u1f 🤜🏼🤛🏼
'It was relatively large and resulted in a very massive thick disk' That's hot.
RapturianCitizen ☆ Might be actually Hot, too!
Sorry, but the density as reported by Anton is incorrect. From the paper: "It has a radius of RP = 1.088 ± 0.064 R⊕ and a mass of
MP = 4.2 ± 1.5 M⊕."
This means a density of about 3.26 times Earth (around 18 g/cm^3), which is still very high, but does not require some strange form of matter that a density of 37 would require.
This is what I found too. I also recalculated the density for 4.2 earth masses. I got about 18 g/cm^3 also and 3.5 times Earth's surface gravity. Glad someone can confirm that. I still think this demands extraordinary explanation. It beats so many heavy elements in density that were just so rare 10 billion years ago. Not to mention having such an abundance of heavy elements coalesce into a planet nowadays seems exceptional. But I am not a physicist of planetary formation so I could be wrong about that. Just with the timescale it took to collect such heavy elements doesn't seem to add up to me.
But whether its a new material or an oddly early collection of heavy elements there is definitely something strange going on over there.
Fascinating. Great program.
Hey wonderful Anton. Sharon
Hi thank you for your information!
Okay, so we have 1. Dwarf planets, 2. Small planets close to their stars with no atmospheres like Mercury, 3. Hellish Venus like planets, 4. Terrestrial earth like planets, 5. Snowball planets like earth was in the past, 6. Water worlds like earth may have been in the past, 7. Dense planets, 8. Super terrestrial planets, 9. Neptune like planets, 10. Uranus like planets, 11. Saturn like planets, 12. Jupiter like planets, 13. Hot Jupiters, 14. Super Jupiter’s, 15. Diamond raining planets, and 16. Molten rock raining planets. There are also some icy moons with liquid oceans and maybe some terrestrial moons orbiting gas giants in the habitable zone. I wonder what will get added to this list.
Weird. One of the best scientific descriptions ever.
The universe is indeed very WIERD.
THANKS ANTON. STAY WELL. 🇺🇸❤🇺🇸
Nothing true,
@Tellestus 0 you have not your LOGIC , you have only what the ather peaple serves you. WOTHER NEVER CAN'T STAY VERTICALLY, WE EVEN HAVE NOT OLL MAP OF ANTARCTIC, YOU NO WAY, BECAUSE THE EARTH IS FLAT , BECAUSE ANTARCTIC IS OL AROUND EARTH.
@Thomas Chrombly the TRUTH is onli in rech secret elita. They don't want to know every body the truth . Think about ANTARCTIC , nobody knows the ol maps of ANTARCTIC. And mor , and mor secret have this earth , and they brush auer mind with ather Planet's, NATHING TRUE
@Tellestus 0 for example . I not believe in TV channels, or I believe 20 % . Becaus they served as onli what they want , many times and not true news.
@Tellestus 0 only you need bless LOGIC
Aw, damn Anton! You've found my home world ...
Computer animation of stellar proper motion is amazing, how far we’ve come with computer power
You should change the name of the channel to, “Where Da Math?”. Since there’s never any Math...
"oh my god, i was wrong, it was math, all along, you've finally made a mathmatician(yes you finally made a mathmatician), you finally. made. a. mathmatician. of meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee. I LOVE YOU DOCTOR ZAIANTON!"
@Silas Law Math is my ally, and a powerful ally it is.
Remember that “da” is Russian for yes. What? Yes, Math
NorthernChev ☆ Legacy Channel Title.
Astrophysics Dominated the Research!
Silas Law ☆ Gorilla Glue Math!
Anton you are also a wonderful person 👏👏👏
Thank you again. I love this stuff.
How do they know it’s density?
I love going back and forth on the Thic Disk
7:25 This planet's density is 37g per cubic centimeter which is denser than the densest element found on Earth, which is Osmium a Platinum group metal that is only 22g per cubic centimeter ?!?!? As a comparison Lead only weighs 11.342 gram per cubic centimeter. So what the heck is this planet made out of???? Whatever it is, it does NOT exist on Earth!!!!
Maybe a shipment of neutronium got the wrong address...
Strange matter, or its a neutron star remnant, would be my guesses.
robinrutschman it’s very mysterious and interesting...
Dunno; measurement error would be my first guess.
It could be something as simple as iron (though in a very strange and interesting form). Osmium is 22g per cubic centimeter when it is subjected to 1 atmosphere of pressure at 0 degrees celsius. But it (like all materials) become denser at higher pressures (such as the pressures of 8 earths sitting on top of it). It's a relatively boring explanation but it seems like the most likely one to me.
"So called" - this usually means there is some doubt about the name.
Or how fitting it is.
so-called = implied scare quotes
No, so-called means that's the usual name it goes by. It only means what you say it means when you're using it ironically.
Yes, plz, no more 'so-called'? Plz?
@Dominic H. I profoundly disagree with your first sentence. I can't see what you mean by the second. I'm British (you haven't told us your nationality or native language, so we can't judge your expertise) and approaching 60 years old (both factors may be significant). To my ear, "he's a so-called footballer" would be said about an actual footballer, but the speaker is implying that he's rubbish (in other words: you might call him a footballer, but he isn't one really). In that usage, "so-called" means that's the name, but it isn't true. I also disagree with @Alan W - the speaker is asserting that it really, really isn't what the name says. Not that there is "some doubt". There is no debate: it just isn't true. Usually, of course, this is just in the opinion of the speaker so debate may genuinely be appropriate. Anyway, calling the galactic halo "the so-called galactic halo" sounds incredibly odd to a native english speaker when you know the galactic halo *is* the galactic halo. I wouldn't say of a piece of cheese "here is a so-called piece of cheese". I might say it of a rancid lump of month-old milk.
Your videos and delivery dazzle me. How scientists figure it out is even more astounding. We're such a smart and stupid society all at once. Stay safe, be well.
I wish society would stop looking down at their phones and look up at their amazing skies!! I often wonder how light pollution affects the viewpoints of people. I feel like if more people saw truly dark sky they would have a better perspective on life, in a society where people are only focused on work and money,they would probably subscribe to Anton! Have a great day and a starry night wonderful people!
I dunno where you live but here in Venice and nearby the night sky is no longer visible due to light pollution and actual smog
MadAtreides1 That’s very unfortunate. I live in Florida under Bortle class 7 skies but I can still venture out into the Florida country side to get a decent view of the galactic plane during the summer. The skies are actually quite nice but not as good as it could be. People are slowly forgetting about their home among the stars, and their home among galaxies. I’m often baffled by the responses I get from people when I talk about space. No one seems to know what I’m talking about, and no one seems to care. I thinks that’s because those people have never yet had the chance to see the night sky how it’s supposed to look. Seeing it gives you a feeling of connection with the universe and helps you realize what’s important, which in my opinion is loving other people.
We could be wrong about the density of course, there is no way to know for sure.
I appreciate that English isn't your first language - Just a heads-up, the expression 'so called' is commonly usually used when you are sceptical about something. As in 'so called perpetual motion'.
Very interesting video, thanks.
Hey, as a non-native english speaker too that was good to know, thanks for the heads-up! What's the right way to convey that there's some specific term an object or phenomena is known as then? a.k.a (also known as)?
@@randomnamechannel9813 A hard term would be something like "designated as' And then the name. If the object had a second, informal name, it is good to include that afterwards.
Personally, I would introduce an object with its technical name, then the informal name, and then refer to it by the informal name.
(Unless you want the formal name to be learned by your viewers.)
For example:
"The star designated as HD102956 is also known as Aniara. Aniara is the... blah blah blah"
This introduces the formal designation, but promotes the informal name for easy usage.
You can do it the other way round though and promote the formal name. Best for classroom teaching I think.
I am no expert though, so take this with a large pinch of salt!
As a Native Speaker, "so called" is the Long Form of putting "Quotes" around a Topic for Emphasis.
Americans making stuff up as we go merrily along.
I've always hated math. But I love What da Math.
Anton, I'd love if you'd put your sources in the video description so people can read the actualy articles!
so the periodic table may have some denser unknown elements to be added? please explain.
Oooh this is fascinating
Sounds like my mother in law. Ultra dense and shows up a couple of times a week.
that dense planet is probably the remnant core of a hot jovian that has had its light elements stripped by its original star going supernova, lol snap... you got it too
the more we know, the more we realize we know nothing. 🤣
General Saufenberg totally agree!!!
Great analogy. 🤣🤣👍
General Saufenberg ☆ Even burying your head in the sand only results in more data. Sand Particles yield "Secrets of the Cosmos!"
Only people with a greater connection to their "higher self", could ever be aware of that 😃
@@FreeAmerica4Ever what can I say, I'm just a genius 🤣
(Socrates: “I know that I know nothing”/ Albert Einstein:
“The more I learn, the more I realize how much I don't know.”) *cough*... 😂
Keep on educating us primordial beings. LOL. I am gonna up my donation. 😂😁😂
Thank you wonderful narrator :-)
Would be really interesting to get samples off that.
So the thin disk is denser than the thick disk?
Yes. However, the thick disc has many times more volume, and several times the mass. Theoretically much of this mass is "dark matter", an unproven theory I believe to be inaccurate. I believe dark matter and dark energy to be 'placeholder' theories that fill in gaps while we figure out what is actually going on.
Anton, enlightene us on coronavirus. Your explanation and preventive measures will be original and genuine and will be help full for many
I also guessed that it is a core of a gas giant which has all of it's gas blown away. But the density is still puzzling.
These sort of planets would usually be expected to be short lived and bounce back from that ultradense state once all of the other layers pressing them down had been stripped away. If it's a long lived object this implies that the pressure in the core of gas giants can create metastable ultradense materials. If this is true then it's potentially possible to create them on Earth in the lab by applying enough pressure in a diamond anvil or with lasers.
It's Planet X with a diamond planet! :-)
☆DIAMONDS IN THE SKY☆
Great vid Man!!!
I've never seen such a planet before, so this is an interesting find :3
So, what do you think, Anton, maybe a planet that has soaked up dark matter like a sponge? Or maybe the remnants of another old star that wasn't quite big enough to become a neutron star, maybe an iron star.
Anton has fascinating news daily.
Long live Anton!
Love it brother!
Maybe explains what i saw last nite the sky Australia 9:28pm ...took photos on my phone dense moon like appearance was perfect ring being cloudy and all wasnt easy to spot ....for a sec ...uh oh ! but feeling excited now bout this vid close but bloody huge !
Does this supposed, super dense planet or its materials have a name yet?
Pretty interesting, thanks for uploading!
04:07 your welcom
thanc
Could this a dense lead core possibly account for the unexplained density?
No. 37 grams\cc is more then 3 times the density of lead. It must be some form of matter we are unfamiliar with, perhaps degenerate matter overlain with normal matter accumulated over billions of years.
Brett Hess yeah I know. I was being lazy and commented before watching the whole video.
Why is everything so called in your videos wonderful person?
Could this possibly be an ancient gas giant that has lost its atmosphere being so close to it's star? Wow! You just answered it. Lol! Great minds think alike. :) I was typing this as I was watching.
I like your info Anton. saves me going out in the universe to look for it. Keith Australia
How does that work Anton, posted 20 minutes ago and having already 2475 views? Keep up the great work. Can you have a session just on the North Star?
Fascinating
A barren, dense planet. Nice. Seems like a gold mine.
Don't drop it on your toe!
Hello anton,
This is person
Two aliens did not like Anton's discoveries!
Very interesting. How was the density determined? Could there be problems with underlying assumptions for this calculation?
How do we know lot of mass of Exoplanets we detect include moons or rings or flybi asteroids comets water vapor and ice in the planets proximity.
from breaking down the spectrum of light, i think the frequencies etc - elements give off a very specific light spectrum frequency
pretty sure thats right
@@eclipse369. what if they Miss some stuff. Their auto be some exomoons in existence or exoasteroids
This is a good a point. I think that there will be some exomoons or even binary planets that could throw us some curve balls in the future. Although this might be a bad example of that. It's really close to it's host star which means moons orbiting the planet become incredibly unstable. And comets wouldn't have any noticeable effect on the star. The mass of a planet is often measured by how it's gravity slightly effects the parent star.
Super dense planets are cool 😎
What is the temperature in interstellar space and inter galactic space?
oh shit, that's really interesting. i wonder if there are more metals in those nodes of stability that might exist. or if it's like metallic hydrogen or something in a very dense crystalline form that doesn't exist on earth. i wonder if it's the core of a star that went supernova, but wasn't dense enough to make a neutron star
I can relate to this planet, I had teachers in school saying I was Dense and peculiar :) LOL
Our galaxy be thick! :D
"Probably not the best planet to go to if you want to lose some weight." I don't know, trudging around in 7 Gs would probably burn a few calories.
living in that environment like the hyperbolic time chamber from DBZ
That’s one thicc disk.
You found unobtainium?
How certain are we on these density measurements? I mean this is absolutely crazy, how the hell would have this thing formed. What do we presume it is composed of? These are not test questions I’m just really fascinated immediately lol
We discovered the planet using the transit method which means we probably have a decent idea of it's diameter. With the diameter and then you can calculate the volume of a sphere. Then mass/volume is the density. The big question mark is how they detected the mass. All of the sources I have read about this say that it is
@@explorerofworlds512 ahh, Anton likes the upper bounds for sure 😅 thats why I love him
it recently morphed into a Squad of very feisty and precise gnats.
Could it be the partial remnants of a star, more specifically a different type of failed star? Or made of parts of such a star? A new variation on a Brown Star?
Although the Jupiter type theory seems closest, due to size and mass.
Galaxies are like cities, with civilizations around every star. So i guess we're like the new kids on the block.
Let's call that special planet......Krypton.
Hello amazing wonderful universe.
‘Dem visuals are cool.
So could a more dense planet swing something like the Omuamua more than a lesser dense planet?
Wow. I bet King Kai lives on that really dense planet.
could the planet be a kind of cold brown dwarf?
I love your channel. Great topics. Great info. Please just drop few so-called's in favor of called.
What is the name of the book that mention the planet
No thanks on buying your t shirt. But if you had a calendar on cool pics of things you talked about, i would buy.
Wow!
Relatively, a red dwarf sun at the age of only 10 billion years, is just a youngling :) Also again the Universe surprises us with this planetary discovery :)