The Armata features WAY better ERA ,. has an APS and has multi channel jammers against drones and still has composite armor that is twice as thick as the one found on the T90M. Also the Armata has a unique Auto loader which is basically the typical carousel auto loader + an auto loader like the one on the Leclerc. The carousel only features non explosive ammunition like APFSDS and the autoloader in the back of the turret features propellant charges and HE. Why do this and not just the Leclerc style auto loader? WAY longer APFSDS and propellant charges are the reason. The Armata only has a 125 mm canon but its ammunition is 50% longer (therefor 50% heavier) and travels faster than 3MB60 found in the T90M. So it has more than 50% more penetration than the T90M. The penetration is somewhere at 1200-1300mm of rolled homogeneous steel. Which is even more than the 130mm on the KF51. The KF51 has insane turret armor but the hull isnt a real improvement over the Leopard 2. Also the Armata is designed as a combat platform, it can carry Verbas (Manpads) Kornets (atgms) Bulats (thermobaric anti personal missiles) lancets (suicide drones) and a 30mm autocanon. The turret can also be switched out on the fly to fit any role. The Panther wins armor but not survive ability of the crew. The Armata would win a head on fight
The Armata features WAY better ERA ,. has an APS and has multi channel jammers against drones and still has composite armor that is twice as thick as the one found on the T90M. Also the Armata has a unique Auto loader which is basically the typical carousel auto loader + an auto loader like the one on the Leclerc. The carousel only features non explosive ammunition like APFSDS and the autoloader in the back of the turret features propellant charges and HE. Why do this and not just the Leclerc style auto loader? WAY longer APFSDS and propellant charges are the reason. The Armata only has a 125 mm canon but its ammunition is 50% longer (therefor 50% heavier) and travels faster than 3MB60 found in the T90M. So it has more than 50% more penetration than the T90M. The penetration is somewhere at 1200-1300mm of rolled homogeneous steel. Which is even more than the 130mm on the KF51. The KF51 has insane turret armor but the hull isnt a real improvement over the Leopard 2. Also the Armata is designed as a combat platform, it can carry Verbas (Manpads) Kornets (atgms) Bulats (thermobaric anti personal missiles) lancets (suicide drones) and a 30mm autocanon. The turret can also be switched out on the fly to fit any role. The Panther wins armor but not survive ability of the crew. The Armata would win a head on fight
![Felix "Unfair" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Oswujxm2Ag0/mqdefault.jpg)
The Armata features WAY better ERA ,. has an APS and has multi channel jammers against drones and still has composite armor that is twice as thick as the one found on the T90M.
Also the Armata has a unique Auto loader which is basically the typical carousel auto loader + an auto loader like the one on the Leclerc.
The carousel only features non explosive ammunition like APFSDS and the autoloader in the back of the turret features propellant charges and HE.
Why do this and not just the Leclerc style auto loader?
WAY longer APFSDS and propellant charges are the reason.
The Armata only has a 125 mm canon but its ammunition is 50% longer (therefor 50% heavier) and travels faster than 3MB60 found in the T90M.
So it has more than 50% more penetration than the T90M.
The penetration is somewhere at 1200-1300mm of rolled homogeneous steel.
Which is even more than the 130mm on the KF51.
The KF51 has insane turret armor but the hull isnt a real improvement over the Leopard 2.
Also the Armata is designed as a combat platform, it can carry Verbas (Manpads) Kornets (atgms) Bulats (thermobaric anti personal missiles) lancets (suicide drones) and a 30mm autocanon.
The turret can also be switched out on the fly to fit any role.
The Panther wins armor but not survive ability of the crew.
The Armata would win a head on fight
The t14 armor against ap is 714 mm vs the of 51 with 1115mm
Одного попадания с пулемета, например, БМП, хватит, чтобы уничтожить главный радар в башне, а значит полностью ослепить танк.
You think German engineers dont think abt that ?
Fire edit btw.
Kf51 panther has more better armour durability damage and most importantly safety 😂
Production of t 14 is also a disaster.
Same goes for range. Panther has a litteral scouting drone. T 14 engine is litteraly 10 rusty ladas combined
The Armata features WAY better ERA ,. has an APS and has multi channel jammers against drones and still has composite armor that is twice as thick as the one found on the T90M.
Also the Armata has a unique Auto loader which is basically the typical carousel auto loader + an auto loader like the one on the Leclerc.
The carousel only features non explosive ammunition like APFSDS and the autoloader in the back of the turret features propellant charges and HE.
Why do this and not just the Leclerc style auto loader?
WAY longer APFSDS and propellant charges are the reason.
The Armata only has a 125 mm canon but its ammunition is 50% longer (therefor 50% heavier) and travels faster than 3MB60 found in the T90M.
So it has more than 50% more penetration than the T90M.
The penetration is somewhere at 1200-1300mm of rolled homogeneous steel.
Which is even more than the 130mm on the KF51.
The KF51 has insane turret armor but the hull isnt a real improvement over the Leopard 2.
Also the Armata is designed as a combat platform, it can carry Verbas (Manpads) Kornets (atgms) Bulats (thermobaric anti personal missiles) lancets (suicide drones) and a 30mm autocanon.
The turret can also be switched out on the fly to fit any role.
The Panther wins armor but not survive ability of the crew.
The Armata would win a head on fight
Bem mas o kf 51 não foi rebocado em um desfile militar 😂
It wasn't towed the handbrake was on by the driver
respect 🇪🇸
POV t34 vs Panther in modern day
T90M vs M1A2 Sep v3 Abrams(None export version).
T14 armata 🎉
Kf51 wasn't even used lol
Neither has the T-14
Yes it has 😂😂😂
@@beniballer1233 no it hasn’t, it has yet to see combat
@@RightWingGamerYT Всего один раз его видели на передовой, хотя это невозможно доказать, так как видео или фото нету.