It's not the win that make you strong, it's the failure that let you know how really strong you are, keep trying my friend, and i know it gonna take off and never touch the ground.
1. It's tail heavy. Peeche thoda weight kam karo. 2. The guy launching don't have to throw it. 3. While hand launch your elevator is too high. Best of luck, doing great.
Why does you upload more videos i like to watch your videos because in whole internet i only found your videos in terms of science very use ful please brother upload videos my hidden scientist is awaken after seen your video 🙃
You should make the prop shorter. It should be around 20% of the length of the wingspan, or else there’s too much torque. But still, great build! Keep up the good work
some info. the model has many issues. the model is twice as heavy as it should be and it has a tail-heavy dom (distribution of mass). an SF prop is being used. it is not clear whether the motor being used, can swing a prop that so large. in this case, the motor kv may be too high. at :19, MASS has been located at the wingtips; equals WRONG. excess Mass has been located at the tail; equals WRONG. avoid adding the mass of a tail wheel. when it is more correctly made, the model will need to be bigger; or have a LIGHTER battery. during a rolling take-off of a taildragger, the tail Should be caused to rise off the deck; via a bit off Down-elevator input. at :30, the use of a DIHEDRAL wing would Increase stability and the model could be controlled, without ailerons. the MASS of the battery should NOT be located at the top of the fuselage. at :32, the location of the elevator control horn, distant from the center line, is NOT correct. at :42, the MASS of servos should NOT be located at the tail. the Mass at the tail should be Reduced, by reducing the height of the vert-stab by 33%. at :48, the span of the horiz-stab should be Equal to 30 percent of wingspan; excessive span EQUALS excess Mass, at the tail. at :58, the lack of gradual reduction of Mass in the tail boom, contributes to wonkiness in the dom. at 1:08, the aoi of the main wing should be Zero-degrees, IF the profile used resembles the clark-y (v1). why is this true. positive aoi is 'built into' clark-y; an aoi of zero-degrees is Correct. at 1:55, YOUR LAUNCHERS ARE INEPT. just launch it YOURSELF. at 2:54, it is not clear whether the profile of the horiz-stab is Symmetrical, as it should be; zero-lift. center of MASS. is a point within the fuselage; it SHOULD be located On the thrust line, and, Vertically aligned with 25 percent of wing chord. correct balancing of a model does NOT correct a wonky dom. see my tutorials, if interested. ideal location of c-m indicated, in linked illustration. googletranslate s3.amazonaws.com/assets.flitetest.com/article_images/medium/truecg-jpg_1384168691.jpg wright.nasa.gov/airplane/shortw.html
Dear friend, there are soo many things wrong with your plane, 1st you should fix the cg it is too tail heavy, 2nd angle of attack and thrust angle are totally wrong ( you raised the wings from the pvc pipe u used for the canopy then u must adjust the motor angle so it is pointing to the cg on the wings.... Actually you use same things that I use like the fs i6x connected with a jr propo and a2212 motor and last thing most of my videos I wear olive shirts😅😅
It's not the win that make you strong, it's the failure that let you know how really strong you are, keep trying my friend, and i know it gonna take off and never touch the ground.
Rulaoge kya.. 😂😂
1. It's tail heavy. Peeche thoda weight kam karo.
2. The guy launching don't have to throw it.
3. While hand launch your elevator is too high.
Best of luck, doing great.
Brotha weight at front is more... So the plane did make smooth move...
Why does you upload more videos i like to watch your videos because in whole internet i only found your videos in terms of science very use ful please brother upload videos my hidden scientist is awaken after seen your video 🙃
Increase the wingspan at least to 50inches, your plane should have gliding capability otherwise use light lipo battery.
It's little tail heavy
Cg is not perfect.. Tail heavy...dont cut fuselage add more on nose..move foreword your motor and lipo.. I think 1-1.5inch will be ok..
You should make the prop shorter. It should be around 20% of the length of the wingspan, or else there’s too much torque. But still, great build! Keep up the good work
Tail heavy and check thrust angle
Best of luck.
Long time no see , Such a great come back bro it's make me feel very happy after watching your 🎥video 😍
Haha thank you bro
Bhi tell Heavy ho gaya. .. balancing thik karo.. make the CG correct
Change the wing structure
Bro it's because of the weight distribution is worng
Your channel is back again
some info. the model has many issues. the model is twice as heavy as it should be
and it has a tail-heavy dom (distribution of mass).
an SF prop is being used. it is not clear whether the motor being used,
can swing a prop that so large.
in this case, the motor kv may be too high.
at :19, MASS has been located at the wingtips; equals WRONG.
excess Mass has been located at the tail; equals WRONG.
avoid adding the mass of a tail wheel.
when it is more correctly made, the model will need to be bigger; or have a LIGHTER battery.
during a rolling take-off of a taildragger, the tail Should be caused to rise off the deck; via a bit off Down-elevator input.
at :30, the use of a DIHEDRAL wing would Increase stability and the model could be controlled, without ailerons.
the MASS of the battery should NOT be located at the top of the fuselage.
at :32, the location of the elevator control horn, distant from the center line, is NOT correct.
at :42, the MASS of servos should NOT be located at the tail.
the Mass at the tail should be Reduced, by reducing the height of the vert-stab by 33%.
at :48, the span of the horiz-stab should be Equal to 30 percent of wingspan;
excessive span EQUALS excess Mass, at the tail.
at :58, the lack of gradual reduction of Mass in the tail boom, contributes to wonkiness in the dom.
at 1:08, the aoi of the main wing should be Zero-degrees, IF the profile used resembles the clark-y (v1).
why is this true. positive aoi is 'built into' clark-y; an aoi of zero-degrees is Correct.
at 1:55, YOUR LAUNCHERS ARE INEPT. just launch it YOURSELF.
at 2:54, it is not clear whether the profile of the horiz-stab is Symmetrical, as it should be; zero-lift.
center of MASS. is a point within the fuselage; it SHOULD be located On the thrust line, and,
Vertically aligned with 25 percent of wing chord. correct balancing of a model does NOT correct a wonky dom.
see my tutorials, if interested. ideal location of c-m indicated, in linked illustration. googletranslate
s3.amazonaws.com/assets.flitetest.com/article_images/medium/truecg-jpg_1384168691.jpg
wright.nasa.gov/airplane/shortw.html
Dear friend, there are soo many things wrong with your plane, 1st you should fix the cg it is too tail heavy, 2nd angle of attack and thrust angle are totally wrong ( you raised the wings from the pvc pipe u used for the canopy then u must adjust the motor angle so it is pointing to the cg on the wings....
Actually you use same things that I use like the fs i6x connected with a jr propo and a2212 motor and last thing most of my videos I wear olive shirts😅😅
Reduce weight to 600 or 700g
Good
It was flying a little
Yes little bit.
Keep it up dear 👍
Thrust angle ki kami hai and cg
Thin wings,,,,,,, increase, ANGEL OF ATTACK
Use coroplast(sunpack) and 1000kv motor with 10 inch prop. Give Dihedral and also increase control surface area.
Try to make it boxier.
What that black thing sticking at the wings
It's, a 3d printed pad to push down the wing. There is screw which keeps the wing attatched.
Tail heavy!!!!(cg)
Your planes tail is to heavy.. Make it light weight.. And check CG of your plane
Its tail heavy
Well try bro
rolling take-off of a taildragger. observe the tail at :58.
ruclips.net/video/SXanmYwyLTI/видео.html
gravity center of false
Задняя центровка
Gg is not balance
Well...try pako...
kabad h ye
your CG very bad dude, dont give up