Russian Iskander, US-Made ATACMS Face Off In Ukraine | Which Missile Is More Powerful? Comparison
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 18 июн 2024
- While Russian Iskander-M missiles have been wreaking havoc in the war in Ukraine, the US-made ATACMS* have just entered the war zone. A former US soldier said the Iskander-M tactical short-range ballistic missiles are a "more capable weapon system" than its "equivalent", the ATACMS. Russian defence analysts also hailed Iskander-M’s performance on the battlefield, underscoring why it is recognised in the West. However, the entry of ATACMS missiles into the Ukraine war stirred a debate over which is the more lethal and superior weapon.
#russia #moscow #russiaukrainewar #ukraine #putin #usa
Video: AP/AFP/Reuters/Twitter
0:00 - INTRODUCTION
0:25 - PUTIN’S ISKANDERS BATTER ZELENSKY’S MEN AS ATACMS MAKE LATE WAR ENTRY
1:25 - RUSSIA’S ISKANDER-M MISSILE
3:22 - UKRAINE’S US-MADE ATACMS
5:26 - ISKANDER-M VS ATACMS
n18oc_world n18oc_crux
CRUX is your daily video news guide to the big events that are shaping our world. We track news, geopolitics, diplomacy and defence strategies and explain how they shape national policies. Crux makes sense of global developments, and analyses their impact on daily lives.
Follow CRUX on Telegram: bit.ly/3fnlLua
Follow CRUX on Instagram (@crux.india): bit.ly/3qSFx1K
Follow CRUX on Facebook: bit.ly/2Lte7iF
#GetCloserToTheNews with latest headlines on politics, sports and entertainment on news18.com bit.ly/2Y4QccL
Also watch:
Crux Decode: bit.ly/3MjzIoG
Crux+ : bit.ly/35mm97B
Crux Most Watched: bit.ly/3KhJ8iX
Seriously? Iskander never been shot down in two years of combat, while ATACMS shot down in first week of use. What an insult....
Yeah, OK. They've apparently taken down F-16s that haven't even reached Ukraine yet too 🤣
@@JustMe-zu2mlstop crying now , desperation can't disprove the fact that ATACMS were shot down .. and we know the faith of F 16s .. like those game changer , abrams , leopards , challengers , HIMARS etc .......
Go and take more copium.😂@@JustMe-zu2ml
😂😂😂😂😂
Iskander is failed missile😂😂
Not accuracy .
Only hit in homes,house complexes,schools,hospitals 😢
Atacms are limited while iskandar are in full production and direct supplies. No prize for guessing.
Seems the Army is letting Ukraine have most their inventory of them so not so limited, you know the US army they don't do small . They have a new missile system and were already phasing them out . Funny how older western tech is as good as or often better than the newest Russian tech
@@randym7961 Funny how the West with all their "game changers'"' are ALWAYS the losers in a war against Russians!
@@randym7961 I don't think so. You forget the recent need to approve 65 billion for Ukraine and Israel. Besides, US is bound to mark up the price of each weapon reaching Ukraine. Besides, where did you think US black ops get their billions in funding. The hidden paper money trail. We are not even talking about corruption.
Nay. Think. uS has thousands of Abrams m1. Yet we are seeing less than 100 supplied to Ukraine.
You got the wrong end.
US ain't life and soul into Ukraine.
@randym79619K720s are soviet era systems---the kremlin to would like to expedite old stocks, and there are vast stocks russia is a huge country and defending it is a full-time industry and effort. i am impressed with the russian maintenance culture of its systems....
@@D-E-S_8559 If you are talking about the Iskanders who knew the Soviet Union was still around in the 2000s lol the USSR fell almost 20 years before they went into service . Also maintenance and Russian equipment are not two words that should be used in the same sentence ! If Russia maintained its equipment better it wouldn't have lost so much of it from breaking down .. A good portion of the Tanks APCs etc etc that Ukraine has captured were because of poor maintenance by your military ! We have all seen the many many videos of farmers hauling tanks etc off with their tractors . And you guys get excited over to 40+ year old western tanks that were broken down when you found them and then you guy shot them lol..
Even the KIMskander is better than ATACMS .
😂😂😂
💯 %
ATACMS is destroying a lot of fuel depots and s400 defense systems. S400 can not defend itself against ATACMS. Just destroyed fuel depot in Luhansk. Cold hard facts hurt. So do ATACMS
Difference : ATACMS is a missile designed for Hollywood. Iskandar M is designed for wars
The iskandar has shown it's worth. The ARACMS is very expensive and not that great. America should have kept the good weapons back
Apparently Iskander was designed for attacking civilian infrastructure and post offices (based on what it's currently being used for)
Yastreb AV destroyed by HIMARS before the new car, vodka smell was even gone. Lol. Two hours after it was deployed--to stop the HIMARS the HIMARS found it and it destroyed exactly ONE HIMARS missile.
To date 6 S400's burned to ashes. That doesn't include the aircraft, Russian soldiers, and ammo dumps destroyed by the HIMARS. The orcs had to move their Black Sea fleet because they were afraid of the HIMARS. Keep talking. Your tears betray you
Awesome take!
really?
Two important caveats. First, Iskander operates on a quasi-ballistic trajectory in the final section, which makes it a much more difficult target for air defense. Secondly, Iskander also has a version with a cruise missile, which, due to the low altitude, is also difficult to detect. And I hope everyone understands that the 500 km range limit is an artificial restriction due to compliance with the treaty on medium and short-range missiles, which is no longer valid?
Both are ballistic, but not that rus s400 etc is so succesful shooting down missiles, as like 15 of those systems got destroyed by Ukraine lol, many more buks, tors, strella, pantsir etc too.
@@bekeneel Ukraine has systems too ?
The Russians already shot down a salvo of atacms over Crimea the other day.
@@bekeneel 🙄
sempre foi a guerra do t3..... só atinge civis com kinzalius, zircons , iskanders e armas químicas.
Com as mãos atadas,sem munições e com o tra.mpas americano contra o Zelenski , mesmo assim ,, bummmmmmm 💥
tropas putins derrotadas na Ucrânia?
Simples . 483 mil mortos __ Inutilizados, paralíticos e evaporados no éter ___ desaparecidos ? 80 mil.Wagners extintos a 78% em Bakmut , todos aniquilados ,normal .
Prisioneiros russos? 20 mil para a troca ahahaha.
Aviões,barcos, refinarias? Bummmmmm 💥 ás dezenas .
Refinarias ? 22 % da produção mosk0w off.
__ 7350 tanques e 70 mil veículos diversos bummmmmm 💥
____ Cercados pela nato,, Finlândia, Suécia, Bálticos, Polónia e Noruega rsssssskkkkkkkl hurraaa vivaaaaaaa urraaaa
Ou seja ,os heróis Ucranianos sòzinhos devastaram 70% do fraco exército russo,se fosse com a NATO ou América, putinsss estavam derrotados há 23 meses na Ucrânia .
Depois,por vingança, putinsss envia kinzalius , zircons , ataca a central nuclear e armas químicas para atingir mulheres, acamados, idosos, bebés, crianças, patos e galinhas na Ucrânia.
Go Crimeia sempre foi e será Ucrânia livre 🇺🇦🔱🇺🇦
ATACMS loose the economic war against Iskandar
😂😂😂
Does it really though when atacms be hitting russian s400, oil refineries and russia airbases in russia and occupied territory of ukraine
no it doesnt because the US is significantly more stronger economically than Russia. literally look at the budgets.
Atacms missile cost $1.47 million 👍
Iskander missile cost $3 million 😂😂😂😂
when has it hit an oil refinery it has 300km range acting like it’s unlimited 😂😂
ISKANDER of course, massively produced over handful of atacms that are being donated.
Which US-made toy ever won in Ukraine?
That why they are officially sending troops now . The Himars did had some success though in the first months .took the Russians slightly longer to figure out how to deal with them!
PR-brainwashing mashine
@@kamalchandramoney3541troops won’t help, they will only get droned into oblivion
@@kamalchandramoney3541How is the s-400 and s-300 doing in Ukraine getting pooped on by himars and atacms left and right? 😂😂
F35?
comparing which weapon can devastate more truly shows how far we have fallen as people. hope to see a day when we all live peaceful regardless of our political system, race or status.
It is quite a long time to read a very sensible comment to a very stupid heartless comparison by CRUX.
We surely as humans riding the speed train to self destruction, most countries now spend more on military than education and health care
Tell Pooty to stop invading his neighbors to steal their territory and resources
I agree! Unfortunately, it hasn't happened yet in the history of Humans - from prehistoric to the present. It doesn't say much for Humans....
@@JamesStreet-tp1vb Tell NATO warmongers to stay away from Russia's border!
The refrigerator parts defeated the West.
Don't forget ATACMS might cost 10x more
Les peuples payent une guerre, qui est celle des costumes cravates, du CAC 40, Davos....Des centaines de milliers de pauvres gens en meurent ☪️☦️✝️❤️🕊️🌏☮️🙏🏼
Dont forget america has thousands of them....and has the money, parts and labour force to make ten times as many...russia is broke and sanctions for parts limits them
It's old outdated tech us mil doesn't even use it anymore
It's 1960 tech
@@deepnurmom1737does that mean it still doesn't cost ten times more than the Iskander or no?
@@brandonlongdikjones8117 ATACMS are old stock, if Ukraine doesn't use them they would be discarded anyway. There are thousands of them, just sitting there already made.
It is an insult to compare the 2 since it is proven that Russia was able to shoot down more than 50 percent of atacms whereas Ukraine has shot 0 per ent of iskander
Proven where? Source? It’s just a short range ballistic missile from the 1980s.
ATACMS is replaced with PrSM missiles, so the warehouses are emptied for new goods, so its price is irrelevant because it is being disposed of. Anyone who gets it in large quantities can do a lot of damage with this precise and deadly weapon.
everytime uki use it, they got strike back 10x n then selinski cries for armament
Islander M is more deadly
ATACMS distroyed russian made s-400 to scrap metals......hahahaha
@@user-ht8dd8kc3x😂according to who jewlensky
@@gregnelson5022 😁🤣according to who PuTIN he is the best comedian and joker🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Iskander-M is more destructive.
😂
Ok bot
🤡
🙋♂️iskander-M
😆
"Sub-munitions" means cluster weapons which are banned by most countries. Russia still uses Soviet era cluster warheads but ceased developing them and does not manufacture any. This is because although it is not an official signatory of the UN Convention on Cluster Munitions (2010), CIS affiliated states voted to end production and use. Russia was in no position to disagree and had learned horrible lessons in the Chechen War.
The USA is the only known manufacturer of cluster munitions and deploys 3 especially cruel types, some with timers.
The USA, Poland, Romania, Latvia and Estonia are not signatories to the 2010 UN law.
The 1992 raid on a Russian Navy airfield in disputed Crimea used timed cluster weapons which could not have been launched by Ukraine.
Russia cluster munitions have a much higher rate of failure to explode than the United States. Russia has used them against Ukraine long before Ukraine received the United States older cluster munitions . Claiming unlimited supply .Putin bragged about Russia's massive stock pile of them. Besides the new and improved cluster munitions that are a much lower failure rate then Russia. The US has powerful cluster bombs that do not explode. It’s steel spheres that devastate enemy soldiers. But does not leave un exploded ordinance on the ground. Being much safer than Russian cluster munitions. Unexploded ordnance kills people long after wars end. And it’s all over Ukraine. If you think Russia is ethical and worried about civilian casualtiesJust look at the Ukraine landscape. And all the leveled cities. The US does not send its latest upgraded weapons to Ukraine. Keep up the wishful thinking!
Russia shoots down Atakams, but Iskander cannot be shot down by Western air defense forces, which is a big difference. Iskander is cheaper and more powerful in terms of accuracy.
Everything is better in Russia, even the advertising. Russia's invincible missiles have been destroyed.
Lol…joke of the century … russian as never shot an atacams and iskander misdiles have been intercepted many times…nice try bot …😂
@@oldowleye3161 Iskander has never been shot down, while Atakams, according to the latest data, have been shot down 11 times. It's a fact. Google it well and make sure.
@@oldowleye3161 Iskander has never been shot down, while Atakams, according to the latest data, have been shot down 11 times. It's a fact. Google it well and make sure.
@@oldowleye3161 Iskander has never been shot down, while Atakams, according to the latest data, have been shot down 11 times. It's a fact. Google it well and make sure.
Id say the ATACMS just because it can be reloaded much faster getting more shots in, and its smaller so it can hide better
😂 copium .....ATACMs has been destroyed while on the move by iskander but iskander has not been shot down, talklsa its luncher being hit
"Its smaller so it can hide better" it doesnt work like that bro. Size doesnt matter. 😂
@@najiv8797 do you even get what the point is? guessing no you dont. smh
9m54- series 300mm glonass guided mlrs, 250kg multipurpose warhead, he frag, cluster dpicm and Ap ,120km listed, 200km is good to go too,
You should be comparing ATACMS to North Korea missile
Iskander definitely.❤ Russia
Modo Wa jobaaaa
😂, 🤮🤮🤮🤮
Saying US can defeat Russia is like saying biden can run up the stairs without stumbling.
Ignore my previous comment and I apologise, I misread what you wrote 🙏
With the mentioned comparison and destructions caused by, Iskander is more superior than the ATACMS.
As shown several of the latter were shot down and failed to do havoc on the target.
Iskander wins.
lol atacms are less than half the size of a istakender why would you compare them totally different weapons
Because they can’t persuade the uninformed with facts.
⚒⛏nowadays Russian shovels are more lethal than ever -- U.S weapon analyst 😅
And their washing machines are pretty good too.
okay kid. its seem you are happy to repeat the "shovel" word but forgot the "days".
@@jajasariaAnother day, so what, you going to the front t count how long it takes or no , plus you don't even know who said that "days" thing to begin with obviously 😅
@@AnthonyKyprosi am an indian. I bought russian made pressure cooker from saudi arabia and brought to my indian. home. That was wonderful cooker. Russians Russians make
@@jajasaria right , that's plural. I mean the present time and the future except the past. Mr. English 😎
Didnt even close to Iskander.. while Russia have Kinzhal. 😢
iScandal is definitely more advanced...
I bet for Iskander M
To be fair compare iskander to USA stealth missiles. Someone just fast and someone hard to detect.
Российская Армия не меряется письками-она воюет!
🔥🔥
Iskander is like a tiny nuclear blast, accurate and faster than ATCMS.
Atacms not cost effective.
3x cheaper than iskander, muppet.
@@bekeneel Direct! Accurate! Funny!!!
Us weapons aren't that good
Its only good against habibi
They are good enough to be better than anything Russia had made. By a superior margin.
Ones about as accurate as a German V2,the other can hit a target within 5 metres cep.
I think atacms are a little better than a V2, not a good comparison
@@tomvlodek6377 you've got the comparison the wrong way round.
@@SnakePliskin762 uhhh, no, you’re the one who’s shameless and continues embarrassing himself after given the opportunity to slither back into the hole he crawled out of…
numbers will overwhelm technology :)
According to Putin it’s also nuclear weapon capable!
Well considering Iskanders slam Odesa and Kharkov on a regular basis while all ATACMS fired at Crimea were downed the answer is clear
That is completely false.
@@Tom-yy2cm prove it!!
ATACMs are being destroyed over Russia but Iskander has been invincible. Where is the comparison charlie ?
❤Come on Guyz this is an insult .Even non military guyz know thez no answer to Iskander missiles. NO nation has absolutely none has an answer to Iskanders
The Iskander an equal to nuclear weapons
Iskander, especially the domestic variant, is in a league of its own. That isnt to say atacms arent good, but yk
People treating this war as if supporting their favorite sport team
Iskander super
But the vehicle is much larger and heavier. HIMARS can get to many more places easily.
Iskander, not so much.
@@iamTheSnarkHIMARS is useless now , it's been taken down like nothing with electronic warfare systems
@@iamTheSnarkislander doesn’t need to get to anywhere that’s why they have a longer range
@@johnwi-l_l-iamsf3763 u haven't been paying attention son 😂😂 himars still very effective.
Russian budget when Putin seated has been able to use it by upgrading the Russian weapons meanwhile USA used their economic by starting a war 😂😂
ATACMs has higher mobility and much faster load times
Iskander is a current model. ATACMS is from the 1980s 😂
Iskander is 10x cheaper to produce but 10x stronger than ATACMS.
Source: pooty bot farm.
A simple Google would say iskander costs 3 million apiece and atacms costs barely a million apiece 😊.
Yet islander can be shot down by a patriot while atacms blows up russian s400 air defence
Atacms missile cost $1.47 million 👍
Iskander missile cost $3 million 😂😂😂😂
@user-qk9he7se5w mach 7 Iskander missile is shot down by mach 3.5 patriot missile. So funny🤣
@user-qk9he7se5w "atacms blows up russian s400 air defence"-claimed by joker Volodymyr Zelenskyy🤣🤣
Iskander is too powerful and difficult to intercept
It's a music i have heard already....👂
so is Atacms apparently.
You should read up on that false statement
Iskandar is combat proven missile
😂😂😂failed missile😂
Cant be compare with Atacms😂
also ATACMS was distroyed s-400 to scrap metal
Russia created a purpose built Iskander missile with it's own military industrial complex. NATO purchased a profit driven ATACMS missile from it's own military industrial complex, sold from the lowest bidder. Purpose built probably wins, but that remain to be seen.
Iskanders are more powerful than attacms
but no accuracy 😂
You have compared the inncomparable
Like asking someone if a .22 hurts more than 9. Y’all love violence
Advanced manufactured items = Jobs
Iskandr is a lot cheaper to produce with the same capability.
iskander making havoc while there are defenses like patriote and arrow and so forth
Cue all the strategic analysts and missile system procurement experts
I dont believe cruxx because iskander is effective only in times that Ukraine is luck of air defence while atacsm is effective while russia has enough airdefence and modern, atacsm is better than iskander, islander is considiered as old model😮😮😮😅
Yup.. you need a wakey wakey buddy!
🇺🇸✌🏻🇺🇦
Difficult to compare since Ukraine and Russia target different sorts of objects. In theory, we could find out which system works better the next time Russia targets Kharkiv by sending the exact numbers of ATACMS and drones to Belgorod. In practice, this won't work since Ukraine is not Russia.
World Powerful 💪 Military Russia 🪖❤️☝️💪💞🇮🇳🤝💞🇷🇺💪❤️
i feel this is a mismatch atacms are no better than 9k58/9a52-2 smerch...
tornado s glonass guided mlrs 300mm 200km 552 9m544 heat frag 160mm rha, 9m549 72 he frag
What type of news it is?
Iskandaler? The Hyper-Tonic Missile?
Change the war balance? Like seriously? That was humour.....as if Russia don't have dagger(khinzal) to throw after the stone is not effective enough and when iskandar can hit from over 200km further where is the competition?
The main shackle on ATACMS is the US insistence on Ukraine only using them within its internationally agreed borders, which includes Ukraine and other territory illegally seized by the invasions. If Ukraine was allowed to hit sources within Russia, maybe Russia would not be crowing.
Да,она бы сравняла Украину с землей
Ohhhh, they’ll be crowing all the way to the Moldovan border 😂
To be fair Ukraine isn't the originator of these arms so it must abide by the dictates of it's arms suppliers. Russia produces it's own arms so it can use them as it sees fit.
There is no fairness in war and these two brothers need to patch up their differences. That may ruffle some feathers, but it's the only way for these two civilizations to move forward some day once all the mutual anger is flushed out.
Iklander must be a priority to stop
Iskander is the Secendar of battlefield❤❤❤❤
Off course Putin is chess player.
had to swith the sound off....
Compare the price tag. I'm sure the US one will win...
What are you comparing
Details would vary but roughly one can say that the Iskander is 2X speed, 3X warhead weight, 2X range compared to the ATACMs
The 300 km range ATACMs barely carries a warhead of 174 Kgs
Creating sensational sounding videos are you
Well it’s hard to say considering Russia uses their missiles on civilian targets.
only military targets
@@efghggdxlmfn33 no all you have to do is watch the evidence. Russians target civilians, they can’t hide their crimes anymore because everyone films everything. Only a fool would believe Russia only attacks military targets.
Every one knows which is superior
Iskander ❤
Winner is the North Korean Missile 😉😉
The proxy war in Ukraine is the first time NATO has tried to pick on someone their own size and NATO is getting humiliated.
The Russian shovel is the king of weapons in Ukrainian battlefields!
What a useless and unnecessary comparison 😮!!! There’s no equivalent to Iskander, in the whole of nato and is like, comparing a bull to an elephant! WHAT A BELITTLE JOKE
😂😂 Sure, they said same about the S400 until we seen it on the battlefield. Ukraine destroyred like 15 batteries already. S400 can't even stop the missiles obliterating them 😂😂 lots of rus scrap metal.
@@bekeneel What are you high on, I hope it’s not that stupid stuff the cia are fending cocainsky with? There’s no s400 in the battle field in Ukraine hence, the Bear has more other capable defensive weapons that could deal with those nato inconsequential weapons! S400 was not made for such gorilla drones strike that the Ukraines are now employing out of desperation!
To burst your bubble S500 is now slated to join the fray and more headache for nato.
60,000 Billion is USA?
Wow
except nuclear, nothing can stop Russias actions in Ukraine.
biden: do we have hypersonic missiles?
Military expert: No sir, we are not that advanced sir.
biden: But we have more money.
Military expert: I understand sir, but the Russians have more brains.
Iskander cannot hit Kyiv even millitary base why, ? putin struggling to capture entire Ukraine's in 3 days special operations maybe decade or failed 🤣😂 Meanwhile ATACMS its more accurate and devastated action against putin!
😮
Iskander.
We can see the level of destruction in Ukraine even with weaker Russian missiles, no question between these two.
We will be able to compare the level of destruction, since now the Attacks and the Stromshadow will be able to be used in Russia.
The Russian have much more missiles. That does not mean that per se they are superior...
@@delldell191 yes, let's see.
@@DanielDeBenoit when NATO is losing “Numbers don’t matter”. Funny people
@@DanielDeBenoit much more missiles? Ukraine has exhausted almost all European stockpiles , American too, how can Russia have more missiles than 50 countries combined?
Iskandar and not even close
Western weapons were over hype as game changers but Ukrainian war has humbled them and has destroyed their reputation ,it works well against a third rate army like Iraq ,Afghanistan and Civilian militias etc
Quoting “Former soldier said”? Really? Your quote is bull and sounds made up
No 1 wins.
You are missing key factors
The ATACMS can be loaded to HIMARS and M270 in a matter of minutes
The Iskander can not
ATACMS weighs just 3600lbs while an Iskander weighs over 8400lbs
ATACMS doesnt need specialized vehicle for reloading whereas the Iskander does
The ATACMS needs no external support while the Iskander requires a whole chain of vehicles
ATACMS can be sent target info, the launcher inputs it and fires
Whereas the Iskander has to get the info from its command truck
Lastly , the ATACMS camouflages itself so enemy cant tell what the HIMARS or M270 is carrying
thereas is no mistaking an Iskander launcher, an attacking forces can easily pin point the Iskander
Cope harder😭
@@johnnewman1483
its called facts try it sometime
tornado s 300mm mlrs glonass 9m54- series , 200km, submunition 552 heat frag and 72 he frag
@@hksp
And yet they have done exactly what ?
@@verdebusterAP it will do exactly what himar can do, he frag is dpicm and 160mmrha penetration , ap is jusu anti personnel.
Shovel vs ATACMS, who wins?
Atacms is cheap and way more accurate.. Can be easily mass produced..
Pooty's iskander is more expensive and accuracy is not as good as atacms.. Plus, pooty can't produce as many due to budgetary constraints.. He has to focus on producing other equipment too within limited budget..
The US can make endless amount of atacms due to its massive budget..
🙄🤡🤭😂
Just keep swallowing what US tells you , you are doing great.
Atacms is Powerfull
It's a stupid comparison and a pointless debate.
The two missiles and their associated technologies
are completely different and intended for different purposes.
Regardless, in Ukraine, Iskander is being used - but not exclusively - to destroy ATACMS, sometimes before they even get a single shot off.
There is nothing particularly magic about ATACMS.
They are just another missile in a multiple battery mounted on a 6 x 6 truck.
They are not especially or singularly more mobile than anything in the Russian collection.
In Russian off-road machines are infinitely superior in its often snow-bound or swampy or boggy terrain.
Russia remains the master of tracked or multi-axle off-road vehicles.
Atacms n1
Nato has made Ukraine a testing ground for all its weapon except for jets
Because there is not enough air defense in Ukraine. Its make US had no guts to send their best Jet Fighters.. it will end up as metal scraps. And automatically will make a vertical drop for tge price market.
A Rússia só está fazendo á cobrar fumar mesmo 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Iskander very expensive
much cheaper than american wunderweapons