Riemann hypothesis proof does not claim million dollars, asks for complex number to scale up to real
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 7 июл 2024
- Link: www.academia.edu/122384584/Nu...
riemann hypothesis
riemann zeta function
did you know
fermat's last theorem
imaginary numbers
riemann
complex numbers engineering mathematics
numerische integration
zeta function
analytic number theory
bernhard riemann
calculus and analytic geometry
collatz conjecture
complex analysis engineering mathematics
complex numbers
computational finance
critical value hypothesis testing
fast fourier transform
fermat's last theorem proof
formula de euler
functions of logistics management
hypothesis in research
indian mathematics
jacques vallee
mathematics
physics
plugged
prime numbers
real numbers and imaginary numbers
riemann hypothesis explained
riemann hypothesis proof
simplex
simplex method in operation research
testing of hypothesis engineering mathematics
theoretical framework in research Did you know
didyouknow
did you know
did you know channel
did you know daily
did you know it
#didyouknow #didyouknowfacts Link: www.academia.edu/114228221/NU...
#riemanhypothesis #riemannhypothesis #riemannhypothesisexplained #riemannhypothesissolved #riemannhypothesisproof #riemannhypothesisnumberphile #riemannhypothesisprimenumbers #riemannhypothesisveritasium #riemannhypothesisquora #riemannhypothesisinhindi #riemannhypothesislecture #riemannhypothesisterencetao #riemannhypothesissolution #riemannhypothesismathologer #riemannhypothesisproofattempts #riemannhypothesisanalyticcontinuation #riemanhypothesisand #riemannhypothesisandprimenumbers #riemannhypothesisandquantummechanics #riemannhypothesisandprimes #riemannhypothesisscienceandmyths #riemannzetafunctionandprimes #riemannhypothesisof1859
#zetazeros #zetafunctionzeros #riemannzetazeros #zetazero0.5 #zetazero0.5zillakami #zetazero0.5instrumental #zetazero0.5reaction #zetazeroslowed #zetazeroalphadisperatoamore #zetazerodarkbeach(slowed+reverb) #zetazeroorbital
#zetazerosand #zetazerosandprimenumbers
Dear Science Community,
I am pleased to present my proof of the Riemann Hypothesis. After 10 years of research and experimentation, I have successfully demonstrated that the Riemann Hypothesis is true. My proof is based on harmonic conjugate of zeta function and its functional equation.
The Riemann hypothesis has been proven in three different ways, each with varying levels of complexity. One approach involves utilizing the functional equation and introducing the concept of the Delta function and the periodic harmonic conjugate of the Gamma and Delta functions, similar to the Gamma and Pi functions. The other two proofs are derived using Euler's formula and elementary algebra. By analytically continuing the zeta function to an extended domain, the poles and zeros of zeta values are redefined. Furthermore, other prime conjectures such as the Goldbach conjecture and the Twin prime conjecture have been proven based on a new understanding of primes and numbers as three-dimensional entities, as elucidated by Hamilton's four-dimensional quaternions. The imaginary number iota is defined as the natural logarithm of two, and the logarithm of negative and complex numbers is redefined using an extended number system. Additionally, the factorial of negative and complex numbers is redefined through the use of the Delta function and the periodic harmonic conjugate of the Gamma and Delta functions.
The Riemann Hypothesis is one of the most important unsolved problems in mathematics. Its proof has eluded mathematicians for over a century. My proof not only solves this problem but also opens up new avenues of research in the field of mathematics.
The implications of my proof are far-reaching. It has the potential to revolutionize the way we think about prime numbers and their distribution in the number line. It could also have applications in other fields such as physics, computer science, and engineering.
I am sharing my proof with the science community in the hope that it will inspire others to build on my work and advance the field of mathematics. I am not seeking any monetary compensation for my work. My only goal is to contribute to the advancement of humankind.
Thank you for your attention. 
Наука
I hope this kind of video won't be flooding RUclips in the years to come.
You can report to RUclips on this, I know I have not broken any RUclips policy. So far flooding is concerned, it takes a lot to flood original contents, it's good for the body of knowledge.
Hahajahaha. Why not? This is so funny!
Mathematics and high culture are topics that are 100% immune to idiots. Even if they spend their whole lives trying to understand, they will never understand.
You could obviously be a good salesman, or even POTUS given the current state of the world. It's a bit sad because the effort looks sincere, at least in some parts. But man... look up Dunning Kruger effect before claiming you solved the most challenging and challenged topic in mathematics, maybe? And if you are really looking for improvement, the 'decimal system' is just base 10, and complex numbers can be expressed in any base just like real numbers, there's nothing to reconciliate there. Then as the video progresses it deviates from any scientific train of thought, it becomes a bunch of buzz words like cryptocurrencies, quantum computing etc. That's good to sell a pump-and-dump, not to keep science-minded people up at night, sorry.
With confirmation bias you look for that which confirms your preconception. With selective perception, you see that which you expect to see. At the same time I can't also defend your allegations bcoz it's dual. See here also Riemann hypothesis is right there. And for your information I know decimal system can be converted to binary and any other base system. In logarithm also change of any base to other bases is a matter of division. Yet there is something called natural log the base of which is Euler number. My suggestion for imaginary number being ln(2) is also rooted in the search of this natural signature. If you like to up at nights in the world of illusion and rise up in the morning empty handed you are excused. I couldn't do so for longer than 10 years, one night I escaped myself from the trances and didn't forget to steal a minus 1 to see everything is very real next morning. I don't know your area of interest, one friendly suggestion don't ever think of going against the flow of time, coming era is of AI and quantum stuffs, don't go against it in any circumstances, you will be solitaired.
@@rhsolved When you don't know the fundamentals of a field, you have no business telling people who might that they are succumbing to confirmation bias or selective perception. Though it is of course possible for experts to fall prey to such things, you simply do not know enough to form a solid basis for such a judgment. It would behoove you instead to demonstrate in humility the data and your conclusions rather than make assumptions about where others are coming from.
Knowledge at its purest form should be freely accessible to everyone. Numbers touches everyones life so everyone is allowed to do research on number theory problems and come out with their solution. May be this way we solve vast number of problems lying unsolved.
@@rhsolved Of course everyone is “allowed” to look into anything they want to. Nobody is stopping you. You still need to do the work and demonstrate your data and conclusions with humility.
Você está doente da "síndrome de Galileu". Uma pena.
2:23 HAHAHAHAHAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAJA. "Separate entities"!!! Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahhaha.
hohohohothohohohohohohohohohothohohohohoho
@@rhsolved how mature. You'll go far.
Bro is onto nothing 🗣🗣🗣
It's all your individual perspective.
2:19; they haven't. The imaginary numbers are completely integrated with decimal numbers in the concept of the complex plane.
Still you can't get rid of i, what kind of integration is that, are you happy? I am not. Complex plane is two' dimensional does that mean we remain stuck at 2D, there are pieces of 3D math lying unorganised, if you think of organising we need to merge complex numbers and complex mathematics with real ones. Once numerical solution to any problem is found you can feel the inside and fill it with any consistent theory such as perturbation theory. Ultimately decimal numbers will win every race.
Amazing historic analysis. Can't WAIT for the mathematics.
Thanks, hope you will find Mathematics also amazing.
After 10 years of research, you finally make an AI generated video!? Such crap!
If you start implementing my work then you will come to know the Havoc of my craps.
sometimes it's better not to say anything
Particularly when your work says everything, let the people grasp it.
@@rhsolved FACTS🗣🗣🗣🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
I wanted to report this, but unfortunately there's no button (yet) for "delusional; uploader needs professional care".
If you really care so much about the RUclips uploads then volunteer yourself to clean the RUclips from nonsense stuff.
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahaha.
What is this garbage? Once I saw how incoherent the "paper's" abstract was (a random mix of related mathematical terms), I didn't need to see any more. I skipped around a bit to have a few laughs, though. This kind of AI-generated content is completely worthless, and truly a scourge on humanity.
Don't blame AI, it's my idea. It may not be consistent with yours but it has got the insights on Riemann hypothesis and many more number theoretical problems, and believe me it will rewrite the physics too in coming future. Such a promising paper should look random naturally, you are not to blame for that.
@@rhsolvedbro thinks he’s a genius lol
I am just a common man with common sense.
Hahahahahahaha. Yeah ...
If you really want a laugh, check out the last 10 pages, where he "solves" all of the problems with physics without a single equation using just gibberish. Truly a man of vision 😝
i feel like if you'd cut away the fluff, focused solely on your (as far as i can tell) logs of negative numbers? and some . and * operations? and dealt with series and sequences more formally (like, have you heard of a 'limit'?) you'd communicate your ideas more effectively, and people wouldn't automatically dismiss you upon seeing your wild claims. If it is as revolutionary as you claim, then you can let the core of the matter speak for itself, don't you think? ;)
Surely I can do that. But who buy now a days without seeing the offers. The fluffs are the offers, really I mean it, if we step out these things are right there. Until I talk about negative logarithm in my nth next video please download my paper and have a glimpse, you will get the flavour.
The complex numbers are never an ordered field. Why is this nonsense better than a non ordered field extension of a complete ordered field?
This is the problem with most of us (except me in this context), they told us it's not an ordered field, does that end there, no why, no when, no how. I did this question to myself and found the following answers. Complex numbers are not ordered bcoz higher dimensions are involved in these, but it can be ordered when merged with real numbers, how that happens, that is the main idea of this video. I didn't disturbed the ordered set, I reconciled the unordered set only just like Einstein believed that instead of quantum Chaos the moon exists whether we look or not.
are you delusional?
May be, if thinking out of the box is so, then definitely I am, and I would love to be so.
lokks likke u solvd maths nd phyzx, noice
Thanks.
do you speak english
I do speak english but the original comment was from, may be, non english speaking countries.
@@rhsolved yeah, i had not problem with you, your fine. its just that the only word he spelt correct was maths.
@@makromath math*
Have you actually read the paper or the video's script?
I have written the paper in 2019-2020. Posting the video script with the help of AI voice very recently.
The paper is full of typos and step jumps, and some times with leaps also. Don't go by the notations, I am not good with neither notations nor latex. Just try to read the message from the formulations I gave and manipulations I made.
@@rhsolvedmy dude it's bad... I'm looking at the proofs at the 17:00 mark and you can't seem to go one line without making a mistake. I can grant you that some might just be bad notation but some are just really bad manipulations for example on the first proof when you say "compare both sides" you have an infinite sum on one side and a monomial on the other. You then claim that the sum of the exponents on the left side is the same as the exponent on the right. Also that the sum of the scalars on the left is the same as the scalar on the right and that's just not how sums work like at all.
But most importantly that doesn't even matter because what you end up calculating isn't the real part of s but of p^s for some p. You've fundamentally misunderstood Euler's formula.
At 17:00 mark I have invoked exponential form of complex numbers in the product form of Zeta function following the Zeta functions analytic property not caring about the infinite series converges or not. These bold step allows me connect Zeta function to the famous Euler's identity and therefore it must be periodic but within a given bound it must converge may be even cheating Cauchy Riemann convergence test. I took the leap, few more manipulation, welcome to the world of Riemann hypothesis. These mathematical world exist in the higher dimensions of quaternions and similar uncharted territories. I know this venture is not allowed in this world, but who cares, I am ready to move to Mars with spaceX.
@@rhsolved I'm aware of what you did. You haven't done anything new. I'm telling you you've made several mistakes along the way that you can't come back from.