Hello guys, check the full PC spec in the video description. If you like the video, please like and subscribe. 0:00 CPU-Z test 0:20 3D Mark Time Spy test 1:00 Rainbow Six 2:30 PUBG 5:10 GTA V 7:20 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9:40 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 11:20 Horizon Zero Dawn 13:30 Cyberpunk 2077
Man it's crazy how good these CPUs are in the bang for buck department. I will definitely upgrade to a 5600X after I upgrade my GPU in a bit once ex-mining cards flood the market.
@Indra Shahdan Aryaputra Wijaya For gaming? Yes it is. Good value now, better value in the future when people start upgrading and prices start dropping.
@Indra Shahdan Aryaputra Wijaya No, probably in 2-3 years. The 2600X is already $160 from $250 in my country. If you already have something decent and still does stuff fine, you should probably wait it out if you can. Alternatively there's the 5600G which is a bit cheaper and a bit slower but can be overclocked for similar performance for a tad bit more power and heat. Also Vega graphics in case of dead or no GPU.
@Indra Shahdan Aryaputra Wijaya If you want higher fps in e-sports games go for the 3600, the 5600X is overkill for a 1650 super in my opinion but if you can find one on a flash sale or something definitely buy one. If you like beautiful graphics more, think about buying a better GPU. I also have a 1650 super system and it struggles with newer titles to maintain 60 fps high settings (not a CPU bottleneck).
@Indra Shahdan Aryaputra Wijaya I belive you can, I play at medium settings + 4GB textures and I get around 100ish FPS, I only have a 90Hz monitor so more than that is kinda wasted. Playing at low + 4GB textures should give 144+ fps.
Cool. But who plays on low settings? Would be better to sow how these perform under normal gaming conditions. At high/ultra settings on 1080p/1440p. Thats where the differecnes will show most.
Nice xD u use pci 3.0 on intel and pci 4.0 on amd, thats what i call a fair test...Both cpu has same performace, and i would even go for intel, check a test of both gpu with an rtx instead of amd gpus, and ull see that this benchmark is unfair.
@Raiyan pci is given by the motherboard, on the video hes using a better motherboard for amd, so u see better performance on amd, but actually intel its better on everything!
Sure, but no one plays games on low settings. I'd rather see how they perform under normal gaming conditions. And how big the difference is there.@@hmmm9183
Hello guys, check the full PC spec in the video description. If you like the video, please like and subscribe.
0:00 CPU-Z test
0:20 3D Mark Time Spy test
1:00 Rainbow Six
2:30 PUBG
5:10 GTA V
7:20 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
9:40 Assassin's Creed Valhalla
11:20 Horizon Zero Dawn
13:30 Cyberpunk 2077
Man it's crazy how good these CPUs are in the bang for buck department. I will definitely upgrade to a 5600X after I upgrade my GPU in a bit once ex-mining cards flood the market.
@Indra Shahdan Aryaputra Wijaya For gaming? Yes it is. Good value now, better value in the future when people start upgrading and prices start dropping.
@Indra Shahdan Aryaputra Wijaya No, probably in 2-3 years. The 2600X is already $160 from $250 in my country. If you already have something decent and still does stuff fine, you should probably wait it out if you can.
Alternatively there's the 5600G which is a bit cheaper and a bit slower but can be overclocked for similar performance for a tad bit more power and heat. Also Vega graphics in case of dead or no GPU.
@Indra Shahdan Aryaputra Wijaya if You are only for gaming , go for 3600 and pick high-end gpu
@Indra Shahdan Aryaputra Wijaya If you want higher fps in e-sports games go for the 3600, the 5600X is overkill for a 1650 super in my opinion but if you can find one on a flash sale or something definitely buy one.
If you like beautiful graphics more, think about buying a better GPU. I also have a 1650 super system and it struggles with newer titles to maintain 60 fps high settings (not a CPU bottleneck).
@Indra Shahdan Aryaputra Wijaya I belive you can, I play at medium settings + 4GB textures and I get around 100ish FPS, I only have a 90Hz monitor so more than that is kinda wasted. Playing at low + 4GB textures should give 144+ fps.
2666 mhz ram for 10400f ???
Cool. But who plays on low settings? Would be better to sow how these perform under normal gaming conditions. At high/ultra settings on 1080p/1440p. Thats where the differecnes will show most.
Not bad and that's with 2666 memory, 10400💪🏿 5600x🔥
5600x vs 10400f ram 4000
5600x vs 11400f ram 3600
The 10400F needs a 570 MB to clock the RAM past 2666.
@@Viewer19 no it doesn't it needs a cheap b560... lol
Nice xD u use pci 3.0 on intel and pci 4.0 on amd, thats what i call a fair test...Both cpu has same performace, and i would even go for intel, check a test of both gpu with an rtx instead of amd gpus, and ull see that this benchmark is unfair.
@Raiyan pci is given by the motherboard, on the video hes using a better motherboard for amd, so u see better performance on amd, but actually intel its better on everything!
@Raiyan go for intel, intel will always have much more compatibility than amd
I upgraded to 5600x and still getting same frames. Any idea why?
видеокарта слабая
Ты без разгона(проца и оперативки) не увидеть разницу
Если чисто по дефолту сравнивать то он на уровне 10400f оба одинаковые кадры показывают что ryzen 5 5600x то и i5 10400f
here im hungary 10400f is half of the price and fot gaming i dont think that worth it
O i5 10400f não é bom?
@@fmgqy539 i dont speak that language
@@Tomxhawk the i5 10400f processor is not good?
@@fmgqy539 ah it is. i meant maybe the 5600x isnt worth it for only gaming
@@Tomxhawk I understand. The i5 10400f is much cheaper than the 5 5600 here in Brazil, I should buy a 10400 then to accompany a GTX 1650 card
why you play on low man why
Its a cpu comparison... people who know how these things work put on low settings.
Sure, but no one plays games on low settings. I'd rather see how they perform under normal gaming conditions. And how big the difference is there.@@hmmm9183