R5 5600x vs. i5 10400f

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 24 янв 2025

Комментарии • 36

  • @ViktorIvanov1111
    @ViktorIvanov1111  3 года назад +5

    Hello guys, check the full PC spec in the video description. If you like the video, please like and subscribe.
    0:00 CPU-Z test
    0:20 3D Mark Time Spy test
    1:00 Rainbow Six
    2:30 PUBG
    5:10 GTA V
    7:20 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    9:40 Assassin's Creed Valhalla
    11:20 Horizon Zero Dawn
    13:30 Cyberpunk 2077

  • @johnfreeman5956
    @johnfreeman5956 3 года назад +12

    Man it's crazy how good these CPUs are in the bang for buck department. I will definitely upgrade to a 5600X after I upgrade my GPU in a bit once ex-mining cards flood the market.

    • @johnfreeman5956
      @johnfreeman5956 3 года назад

      @Indra Shahdan Aryaputra Wijaya For gaming? Yes it is. Good value now, better value in the future when people start upgrading and prices start dropping.

    • @johnfreeman5956
      @johnfreeman5956 3 года назад

      @Indra Shahdan Aryaputra Wijaya No, probably in 2-3 years. The 2600X is already $160 from $250 in my country. If you already have something decent and still does stuff fine, you should probably wait it out if you can.
      Alternatively there's the 5600G which is a bit cheaper and a bit slower but can be overclocked for similar performance for a tad bit more power and heat. Also Vega graphics in case of dead or no GPU.

    • @jozif7114
      @jozif7114 3 года назад

      @Indra Shahdan Aryaputra Wijaya if You are only for gaming , go for 3600 and pick high-end gpu

    • @johnfreeman5956
      @johnfreeman5956 3 года назад

      @Indra Shahdan Aryaputra Wijaya If you want higher fps in e-sports games go for the 3600, the 5600X is overkill for a 1650 super in my opinion but if you can find one on a flash sale or something definitely buy one.
      If you like beautiful graphics more, think about buying a better GPU. I also have a 1650 super system and it struggles with newer titles to maintain 60 fps high settings (not a CPU bottleneck).

    • @johnfreeman5956
      @johnfreeman5956 3 года назад +1

      @Indra Shahdan Aryaputra Wijaya I belive you can, I play at medium settings + 4GB textures and I get around 100ish FPS, I only have a 90Hz monitor so more than that is kinda wasted. Playing at low + 4GB textures should give 144+ fps.

  • @badracherki1474
    @badracherki1474 Год назад +2

    2666 mhz ram for 10400f ???

  • @Oozaru85
    @Oozaru85 11 месяцев назад

    Cool. But who plays on low settings? Would be better to sow how these perform under normal gaming conditions. At high/ultra settings on 1080p/1440p. Thats where the differecnes will show most.

  • @Devil19Driver
    @Devil19Driver 3 года назад +4

    Not bad and that's with 2666 memory, 10400💪🏿 5600x🔥
    5600x vs 10400f ram 4000
    5600x vs 11400f ram 3600

    • @Viewer19
      @Viewer19 3 года назад

      The 10400F needs a 570 MB to clock the RAM past 2666.

    • @TheBURBAN111
      @TheBURBAN111 3 года назад +4

      @@Viewer19 no it doesn't it needs a cheap b560... lol

  • @Darkadi
    @Darkadi 3 года назад +1

    Nice xD u use pci 3.0 on intel and pci 4.0 on amd, thats what i call a fair test...Both cpu has same performace, and i would even go for intel, check a test of both gpu with an rtx instead of amd gpus, and ull see that this benchmark is unfair.

    • @Darkadi
      @Darkadi 2 года назад +1

      @Raiyan pci is given by the motherboard, on the video hes using a better motherboard for amd, so u see better performance on amd, but actually intel its better on everything!

    • @Darkadi
      @Darkadi 2 года назад +1

      @Raiyan go for intel, intel will always have much more compatibility than amd

  • @XIIMSPYDER
    @XIIMSPYDER 3 года назад

    I upgraded to 5600x and still getting same frames. Any idea why?

    • @mishok18
      @mishok18 2 года назад

      видеокарта слабая

    • @kanamekuran3519
      @kanamekuran3519 2 года назад

      Ты без разгона(проца и оперативки) не увидеть разницу

    • @kanamekuran3519
      @kanamekuran3519 2 года назад

      Если чисто по дефолту сравнивать то он на уровне 10400f оба одинаковые кадры показывают что ryzen 5 5600x то и i5 10400f

  • @Tomxhawk
    @Tomxhawk 3 года назад +1

    here im hungary 10400f is half of the price and fot gaming i dont think that worth it

    • @fmgqy539
      @fmgqy539 3 года назад

      O i5 10400f não é bom?

    • @Tomxhawk
      @Tomxhawk 3 года назад

      @@fmgqy539 i dont speak that language

    • @fmgqy539
      @fmgqy539 3 года назад

      @@Tomxhawk the i5 10400f processor is not good?

    • @Tomxhawk
      @Tomxhawk 3 года назад

      @@fmgqy539 ah it is. i meant maybe the 5600x isnt worth it for only gaming

    • @fmgqy539
      @fmgqy539 3 года назад

      @@Tomxhawk I understand. The i5 10400f is much cheaper than the 5 5600 here in Brazil, I should buy a 10400 then to accompany a GTX 1650 card

  • @eriksinester
    @eriksinester 2 года назад

    why you play on low man why

    • @hmmm9183
      @hmmm9183 2 года назад +2

      Its a cpu comparison... people who know how these things work put on low settings.

    • @Oozaru85
      @Oozaru85 11 месяцев назад

      Sure, but no one plays games on low settings. I'd rather see how they perform under normal gaming conditions. And how big the difference is there.@@hmmm9183