@@BoxCox I actually want to learn Russian but it seems to be a huge pain learning it myself and language courses here are just english/spanish(non-burger here btw)
@@Calajese yea, learning a new language is always a huge pain. Never liked doing it. But, you know, quite a lot to gain. Access to a russian web, swearing of course. Mother Russia itself. And literature if you are a nerd.
Google is so fast and accurate that it even has time to sort and filter data so that they can give you propaganda instead of what you want while tracking you at the same time. Very impressive.
Why because a search needs some information about the user to do a task. Restaurants? Google knows what restaurants you like and where you are so it can recommend you to things in your local area. You just can't do something like that without some user profile lol.
All the people hating on google because it filters results and tracks you simply forget that, that is basically what you WANT a search engine to do. Filter results and give you the most relevant thing to you as fast as possible. You need know the person to do that. No way around this.
Other than the information they have on you, yes for no other reason. Also the video uploader should know that yandex.com is better for native English speakers than yandex.ru, for the .com version is in English. KGB Putin knows the text in the images you reverse image search at Yandex.
RUclips algorithm isn't accessible by RUclips engineers and RUclips developers because its all made by AI and code which is machine language written is too complicated to be understood by any human
@@lolnjeoglondajmejejplejlis3365 I still find the relevance of ads a bit creepy like I've even turned off my Advertising ID yet I still get personalised ads
@@lolnjeoglondajmejejplejlis3365 Clearly they do have some say on how things run, because they can push for certain things to be prioritized, and not so much for others. Such as media outlets that compete with the main stream, etc.
The reverse image search in yandex is just freaky. It was apparently made to target things like faces and can let you find information on people who's pictures you have
@@linux_fox yes. It found nothing on me. Well, I'm not into divulging my information on the net, so there's that, though I was hoping it could find my face on group photos from friends/acquaintances/random strangers I was caught in the photos of while passing by etc.
Details like these drastically degrade credibility/reliability of these kind of videos. I get that "average user" might not know about stuff like this, but if you're doing a comparison video, you put yourself in "better than average user" position and you better know what you're talking about.
@@dejfcold Google hides this shit behind an obscure and ambiguous drop down and Bing doesn't, I think the video perfectly conveys the differences. Microsoft clearly pays their UI design people much better than Google does, why in every redesign does youtubes interface get worse? Why is googles homepage 90% empty space and all the google platform tools are shoved into a drop down with an accompanying scroll bar that occupy maybe 1/8th of a screen. Google sucks at UI design and are far behind competitors in making user friendly applications, if it weren't for the fact that they were there earlier than their more modern competitors they would have no way to compete.
@@Mr.ToadJanfu it's not that we're saying Google has good UI design, it's that the guy doesn't even mention a simplified version of the advanced search page even exists. Right now, the guy is put in a position of power and trust, and is completely biased against Google, giving absolutely no credit where it is due. Of course, that doesn't mean he's wrong about the tracking, but that's not the point of the original comment
I liked using Bing for the reasons you mentioned and also because it's image search is infinitely superior specially with that one tool that allows you to scan a crop of the image and it finds more of that person, clothe, etc. It's incredible useful for an artist like me. But recently it's borderline unusable not only Bing but most Microsoft apps because no matter how many settings you go trough to set your language preferences to English, if you life in Mexico like me good luck your results will be a mix of taco and McDonald's. It makes it very annoying to do simple and complex searches because 90% of the time you won't get the results you want, if you wanna look up news just forget about it. I now use duck duck go which in my experience gives me the same results Bing gave me, I just use Bing when I need to look up image references.
Do you not speak Spanish? I'm not saying such a thing is impossible, I just didn't know there was groups of english speakers in mexico that was as visable as spanish speakers in America.
@@fastestdino2 in Latino, natively speak Spanish, yet all my apps are in English; it just became my preferred language for tech as soon as it became my second, originally it was also under the drive of improving at it, but then i just became used to it since i mostly interact with English speaking communities online even though i still speak Spanish daily. a lot of people are like me with english as their 2nd language, likely op as well
@@Sh4rlabyzer Well, Opera isn't any safe either. It couldn't be closer to being called "Chinese Malware", if you are using it, you are sending your data to the CCP.
@@Misteribel "google-style censorship" is not the same as personal info gathering. Do your own research and you will see that they are censoring what they deem as disinformation.
Well, from my experience with Yandex, as native russian speaker - it's... weird. In one hand - it's not that far from Google in terms of policing and censoring "wrong" political opinions in post-soviet countries, as well as it has some annoying tracking. In other - it has quite good features (like automated translations of videos by neural networks within minutes) and it's neutral to most things that are aside of politics... which also includes "privateering"
I hate Google for 1 reason: it mindlessly recommends journalism over all other content. The internet has this great benefit over other forms of media that anyone can post information easily for anyone to see, it allows experts to create a website and share information to you. Instead Google prefers to give this role to clueless journalists who have no knowledge on the subject, who talk to under qualified “experts”, and who give a barebones and often incorrect summary on what you want. I want content made with passion, not content spat out for a commission
@@diablo.the.cheater in a capitalist society, we need as much competition as we can get or the entire economy is undermined. It's especially important in the web since it's so widely used. Have a look at Amazon's ethics if you think monopolies on the internet are a good thing.
@@NicheAsQuiche In order to prevent monopolies we'd need to actually pass legislature that prevents companies from gaining too much market share, given that both major political parties in america are hard for "laissez faire" this is extremely unlikely to happen
@@original5243 both methods work. Free market method is more resource efficient and loophole proof, but it's not gonna happen because people too lazy to make the informed decision and act on it. That doesn't invalidate my original statement though
@@original5243 We already have good antitrust laws, new laws won't fix anything. The reason being the government doesn't even enforce the laws, including the one mentioned. So if the government is in bed with the massive monopolies, how would passing new laws help? People just need to use their brains and make better decisions. We need to instill critical thinking, logic and reason, and finally responsibility into the minds of our people.
@@therandomofrandom9152 first try it decided to not work. Second and Third didn't install anything or do anything because my wifi card was crap. Fourth was fine
It's actually better to use public searx rather than host your own (assuming you would be the only user of your own instance) since the search engines can't build a profile around searches of multiple people. If you are the only user of the searx instance, using searx isn't much different than just googling normally (except you give your data to multiple search engines at once instead of one). At least this is how I understood this from when I looked into searx some time ago.
yea, that's exactly what I was thinking. Maybe could even be used to fingerprint you more accurately. I don't know how it actually works so I could be completely wrong
@Sic Semper Mortem Tyrannis yeah but if the ip of the server is same for all your queries it's the same as if they came straight from your computer. Google etc. can build their fingerprints for your server which represents you since the queries only come from you.
@Sic Semper Mortem Tyrannis You don't get my point, it doesn't matter where the instance is as long as you are the only user all the queries that go trough are yours and yours only meaning google can build profile just based on all the queries that go trough. If you however use public instance google can't connect all the traffic to you and you only since it comes from multiple people. It doesn't matter whether the queries come from your home ip or server ip google can build the profile just as well. Whether it can connect the profile to you or not that's different case.
@Sic Semper Mortem Tyrannis So? what does it matter whether they come from server or your local ip? The queries come from one ip and can be connected to build profile. You don't seem to understand what I am trying to say here or you simply refuse to belive that google can connect profile made with different ip to you.
I'm incredibly disheartened by Google/Alphabet. I've been working in web stuff for going on 30 years and up until around 2012 or so I was a huge believer in Google. However, over the past decade things have vastly gotten out of control and their actions are beyond acceptable. As an example, the year they started charging for their maps API was a huge eye opener. Our company went from paying nothing to almost 20 grand a month. To make matters worse we spent the better part of a decade integrating their mapping software into our work. Sure, I get they need to get paid and all, but... it was just absurdity. Thankfully Google is actually very stupid in their ability to foresee their own actions, so we were still able to hack a free mapping account of them, but still... just pathetic.
If it were a private user forced to pay, I'd be outraged, but a company being billed is perfectly reasonable. The whole "it used to be free" thing sounds like whining.
I have personally set up my own searx instance. Works very well for me, but can be a bit slow at times (this is hardware limitation though and nothing to do with the product itself.) Easily maintainable, customization and open-source, what's not to love? :-)
@@oreos3174 lol, yeah I thought of that. This post was made a while back, and I thought of this potensial security flaw. It's been running on a VPS for quite a while now 💀
Bing is the most direct large search result, Google is the most "guided" search and they push what they think you are looking for by context rather the direct search quotes
With google images, you can click "tools" right next to "settings" and get a similar set of options for filtering images. bing is still more robust, however.
I prefer bing because of its similar calculator/conversion calculator to google, and also has a built-in molecule visualiser when you look up any chemical formula. Also the rewards program is a massive plus.
When I search for chemical formulas in bing I just get similar results to the google ones, in slightly more ugly. No visualizer there also it shows me trending search results that do not interest me, Google shows me my last search results instead. Also google has the same conversion things as bing, but also adds integrated stuff like a guitar tuner, a metronome, random generators, colour pickers, etc. Google also doesn't load an image in the background and weird news that don't interest you, it's way cleaner in terms of looks, and also has a dark mode.
@@kipchickensout Yeah, the molecule visualiser seems to have disappeared since I made my comment. Google's calculator is also much better, offering a calculation history and more trig functions. I almost never load the actual frontpage of bing as I have it set as my default search engine in my browser, and I had never noticed the "trending search results" before, and now that I notice them, they're fairly obtrusive. News and background image can be disabled in the hamburger menu, but it doesn't seem to remember my preferences, even when I'm signed into my Microsoft account. Not having a native dark mode doesn't really affect me, I already use dark reader on almost every page.
@@vijaysridhar351 Is based on bing results, but with less tracking and a good cause! / Not full privacy oriented, but definitely better than google, yandex, and even bing itself! :)
in my personal expitiense google dropped from the best searche engine to the worst. Search results only partually relevant, reverse image search is hella awful, regualr image search is awfull aswell, news tab is missleading and havely censored. Yandex is as spooky as google but their reverse search engine is 100% top notch, works as a charm.
Then thr Buzzfeed news about Google's manipulation of search suggestions broke, I tested it for myself. "Hillary Clinton ind" auto-completed to Hillary Clinton India, and not Hillary Clinton Indictment, which is what I got from Bing. Switched to DuckDuckGo that day and never looked back.
@@stueyphone That's part of the Qanon conspiracy theory that's getting more popular with the far right. One of their beliefs is that Hillary Clinton murders and eats babies.
I've began using StartPage ever since I saw you recommend it, and I really love the safety and privacy/anonymity features it has. I don't miss Google at all!
I use Ecosia because the plant trees every 45 searches (or at least around that) and that might seem like a lot but you have to consider how many searches there are, and also, it’s somewhat private and you can actually turn on full privacy somewhere in the settings, where that is, I am not sure
It's pure green-washing. The servers generate way more co2 that the surviving trees will absorb. I highly recommand that you look at the way the money is used... Most of it go to shady one man start-up with very low capital. A part of the money just disappear and most of the trees that got planted die very quickly. It's purely a commercial argument, you will not save the planet while researching porn. It's not a good reason to be tracked.
@@rollinontheboard well, the B corp certification and the reported 165 million+ trees planted (admittedly, they are the ones reporting the amount planted, but B lab IS respectable nonprofit) to mean SOMETHING, right? also, this took a long time to reply because i had no knowledge you replied
If I was a young man I'd be more concerned about privacy, but it is worrisome that information is piliticized or filtered in any way. This is especially important for scientific information, but it's good to know the shadings can occur for any kind of information. You can learn the search engine command lines for more advanced searches as well.
You should mention that if you're looking to get your hands on some games through morally gray means that Yandex is much better. They are much more likely to show you rutracker or some other actually useful website than the other search engines you showed.
@@rpe Sometimes this is what I actually need. I found good internet resource, and I know, the next time I search the Internet - I find it again. Only search string needs to be remembered.
I run a small electronics company , I use Petal (Huawei's search engine) . because 1. there is nothing I know that Huawei doesn't know way better 2. I'm totally sure they won't go running to Washington with my data 3. it gets noticeably better over time 4. The text is easy on my older eyes.
Thanks for reminding me about Swisscows again! I'd known about it before but forgotten it. Goodbye Brave. You've got a lot of good content Mental Outlaw, I keep seeing your 4 eyed cat face covering many topics that interest me, it's about time I subbed. 😎
Once I uploaded my brother's face to the yandex image search thing and it found a video with 20 views from 2 years ago that he was a part of. It's freakishly good, and also absolutely terrifying.
What about Qwant? They are not anti censorship but still a candidate for modularization for me. I use it once every few weeks on my "Google only" browser. Response time is sometimes shitty, but result quality is good enough for me.
A meta-search-engine kind-of does that. It submits your query to a bunch of engines, gets the results and filters out the duplicates. The video specifically mentions searx as an example of such an engine.
@@Roxor128 used Searx for a few weeks. It really isnt that intuitive for daily uses. And the results also lack the visibilty of quick cards and info-at-a-glance sections... like COVID cases or movie ratings. Searx is good for those research based queries tho
@@Roxor128 doing a quick search for some instant info... Like movie timings, weather, quick how-to's, etc. Cant really expect us to use Searx for that, can you? I hope you understand why
Swisscow was one of those things that I accidentally stumbled upon when looking for alternative, gotta say. I love how considerate the name it is on it's own lol.
Thank you. I was never with it except for maybe computer stuff but now more and more I find it hard to care for keeping up to date. E.g. I still mostly use email than texting. Thanks for this vid.
Startpage is an interesting one since it basically just forwards your search to google and gives you the results without giving google your context data
If only people realised how politically biased Google was. I would not doubt that they are a significant contributor to today's political polarisation.
While what you said is all well and good which one get's you closest to the mythical "core" of the internet? Closest I ever felt to finding it was back when search engines used to be kinda "stupid" and would throw out technically inaccurate results that would amazingly somehow hit on exactly what you're looking for. Just because a search engine has less spyware and gives the bioluminescent less info (SUPERMASSIVE doubt) doesn't mean it's any good since admittedly search engines by their very function is either outright spyware or so immediately adjacent you might as well call it spyware.
Great info! One thing I will mention is google image search has the same filtering functions as Bing for years. It just under the tools button. Another thing I'm curious about is the quality of results in general from google. I personally have never had issues finding anything and I use it regularly for work in IT. I haven't tried the other search engines much but only mainly because I generally can find what I'm looking for. Sometimes if what I want doesn't come up I can just rephrase my query a different way and that does the trick normally. I'm fully engrossed in the google eco system so privacy from them is almost a joke if I tried to keep it I guess. Would be nice if they offered more options to be respectful of that but it really is partly my fault as well for just letting them collect all my data lol
What about Qwant? New to the channel btw, good shit. Considering popping my OS cherry and installing Linux. Just worried about DAW's not working (except for BitWig, I guess).
Yandex is dope af 👌 Alice rocks! The only search engine that stopped Google. In Russia Google is losing, lol. What really freaks you out is the automatic video translations. Just...how fo thry do that? Their technology is insane.
1:22 Best bet if you want more privacy with Google search is to use a new private window and a VPN so it can't tie your search to your cookie or your IP. I use StartPage instead of Google many times because StartPage gets the search results from the Google system but they don't tailor the results to you and it's more private.
"Cyrillic alphabet boys" I have never heard of a better way to reference the russian agencies than this
Ыыыы просто пользуйся вражескими сервисами, они же не отдают информацию твоим спецслужбам
Yandex has wicked search capabilities for images, handy tool for OSINT.
@@BoxCox I actually want to learn Russian but it seems to be a huge pain learning it myself and language courses here are just english/spanish(non-burger here btw)
@@stuvademakaroner9607 you're right Slav brother
@@Calajese yea, learning a new language is always a huge pain. Never liked doing it. But, you know, quite a lot to gain. Access to a russian web, swearing of course. Mother Russia itself. And literature if you are a nerd.
Oh dear, Yandex has been handing over my anime reverse image searches to Russian authorities...
they're providing you the sauce in real time.
@@MentalOutlaw mmmmmm M mmm, very nice
Yes, now I know your bloody weird fetishes
Kinda sketched out about yandex but their anime results are too good.
@@MentalOutlaw *MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM*
Google is so fast and accurate that it even has time to sort and filter data so that they can give you propaganda instead of what you want while tracking you at the same time. Very impressive.
Google is still the best search engine if you want to find 90% of things.
Why because a search needs some information about the user to do a task. Restaurants? Google knows what restaurants you like and where you are so it can recommend you to things in your local area. You just can't do something like that without some user profile lol.
All the people hating on google because it filters results and tracks you simply forget that, that is basically what you WANT a search engine to do. Filter results and give you the most relevant thing to you as fast as possible. You need know the person to do that. No way around this.
@@KManAbout Keep using Google, no one cares if you use it.
@@R1gBoN3Gaming lol. you missed the point
0:00 Google
2:13 Bing
5:01 Yandex
6:11 DuckDuckGo
7:06 Searx
8:05 Swisscows
Thanks!
Swisscows
no startpage?
Ducks for the win!
No ecosia sadly
How ironic that RUclips recommended me this for no apparent reason
Other than the information they have on you, yes for no other reason. Also the video uploader should know that yandex.com is better for native English speakers than yandex.ru, for the .com version is in English. KGB Putin knows the text in the images you reverse image search at Yandex.
RUclips algorithm isn't accessible by RUclips engineers and RUclips developers because its all made by AI and code which is machine language written is too complicated to be understood by any human
@@lolnjeoglondajmejejplejlis3365 I still find the relevance of ads a bit creepy like I've even turned off my Advertising ID yet I still get personalised ads
@@thisaccountsucks5556 nice picture
@@lolnjeoglondajmejejplejlis3365 Clearly they do have some say on how things run, because they can push for certain things to be prioritized, and not so much for others. Such as media outlets that compete with the main stream, etc.
Actually google gives nice pirate results if you search in russian
oh my god yes literally everything is free if you are searching in russian.
Tell me how please
@@kevyyar just use a translator lol
i search in arabic, good shit
@@kevyyar write скачать instead download and file name
The reverse image search in yandex is just freaky. It was apparently made to target things like faces and can let you find information on people who's pictures you have
Spooky. I'm going it try it on me
@@iamtrash288 Did you?
@@linux_fox yes. It found nothing on me. Well, I'm not into divulging my information on the net, so there's that, though I was hoping it could find my face on group photos from friends/acquaintances/random strangers I was caught in the photos of while passing by etc.
whose**
Cool, now I can stalk my favorite porn stars!
Never in my life i would have expected Bing to be actual somewhat useful.
google’s just overrated as shit
@@framednapkin tru
i might actually give it a try
I've been using bing for a year now, and to be honest, it's s really good search engine
I've no joke used bing for 2 years now and I've never regretted anything
"Don't be evil"
they took that out a couple of years ago, no joke
@@seres1, still have the archive
They changed it to "Do the right thing" awhile back.
You either die a hero or live long enough to become the villain
@@BlueSatoshi "do the right thing" for who though?
4:25 That filter thing is called "tools" and it's right next to the "settings" button. You don't have to go to the advanced search page.
really a rushed video imo
Details like these drastically degrade credibility/reliability of these kind of videos.
I get that "average user" might not know about stuff like this, but if you're doing a comparison video, you put yourself in "better than average user" position and you better know what you're talking about.
@@dejfcold Google hides this shit behind an obscure and ambiguous drop down and Bing doesn't, I think the video perfectly conveys the differences. Microsoft clearly pays their UI design people much better than Google does, why in every redesign does youtubes interface get worse? Why is googles homepage 90% empty space and all the google platform tools are shoved into a drop down with an accompanying scroll bar that occupy maybe 1/8th of a screen. Google sucks at UI design and are far behind competitors in making user friendly applications, if it weren't for the fact that they were there earlier than their more modern competitors they would have no way to compete.
@@mikedw6748 Its not a rushed video. Its a biased video about things being biased.
@@Mr.ToadJanfu it's not that we're saying Google has good UI design, it's that the guy doesn't even mention a simplified version of the advanced search page even exists. Right now, the guy is put in a position of power and trust, and is completely biased against Google, giving absolutely no credit where it is due. Of course, that doesn't mean he's wrong about the tracking, but that's not the point of the original comment
"Use bing if you want easier access to daily stormer" doesn't sound like a good advertisement for it
It's a great one wym?
@ hello? Cringe Department?
@@duckmeat4674 do you fucking know what the daily stormer is?
@@Poly_0000 BuzzFeed for tradcaths
@@duckmeat4674 haha ok
I liked using Bing for the reasons you mentioned and also because it's image search is infinitely superior specially with that one tool that allows you to scan a crop of the image and it finds more of that person, clothe, etc. It's incredible useful for an artist like me.
But recently it's borderline unusable not only Bing but most Microsoft apps because no matter how many settings you go trough to set your language preferences to English, if you life in Mexico like me good luck your results will be a mix of taco and McDonald's. It makes it very annoying to do simple and complex searches because 90% of the time you won't get the results you want, if you wanna look up news just forget about it.
I now use duck duck go which in my experience gives me the same results Bing gave me, I just use Bing when I need to look up image references.
Do you not speak Spanish? I'm not saying such a thing is impossible, I just didn't know there was groups of english speakers in mexico that was as visable as spanish speakers in America.
@@fastestdino2 I'm indian, fluently speak and write hindi but I still prefer English wayyy over Hindi in my searches
@@fastestdino2 in Latino, natively speak Spanish, yet all my apps are in English; it just became my preferred language for tech as soon as it became my second, originally it was also under the drive of improving at it, but then i just became used to it since i mostly interact with English speaking communities online even though i still speak Spanish daily. a lot of people are like me with english as their 2nd language, likely op as well
It is a year old but you can hide your geo location I'm pretty sure or spoof it to USA I personally don't do it but Ik its possible
Bing is annoying af just for the massive amounts of unrelated ads it shows me
Would love an updated one of this with Qwant, Brave search and a few other new engines, maybe with revised ratings for old ones too.
Hell yeah, where are my startpage boys at?
Brave is a false privacy browser. Stay away from it.
@@toasterzyx thanks for the info i didnt know that, ig imma install opera then and use duck duck go instead
@Xaarpus
He’s bullshitting.
@@Sh4rlabyzer Well, Opera isn't any safe either. It couldn't be closer to being called "Chinese Malware", if you are using it, you are sending your data to the CCP.
Duckduckgo joined google-style censorship
Do you have a reputable reference for that? ‘Google style’ would imply storing user’s data, and not doing so is the bread and butter of Duck.
@@Misteribel "google-style censorship" is not the same as personal info gathering. Do your own research and you will see that they are censoring what they deem as disinformation.
@@izaakveenstra5027 I did, that's why I asked for a reference. Apparently you did your research, just copy it in, so that others can learn and verify.
DDG just committed seppuku by announcing they will downrank news from Russia.
Swisscows seems like a good search engine for no nut november.
It's better to have the browser pornproff with antiporn pluggins and stuff, but of course, it takes time, and the cooming waits no one :(
@@transforgoku lol
Or For Schools.
No CP November :(
@@cakeisyummy5755 DONT TELL THEM
Well, from my experience with Yandex, as native russian speaker - it's... weird.
In one hand - it's not that far from Google in terms of policing and censoring "wrong" political opinions in post-soviet countries, as well as it has some annoying tracking.
In other - it has quite good features (like automated translations of videos by neural networks within minutes) and it's neutral to most things that are aside of politics... which also includes "privateering"
It is sensitive on politics? Never noticed lol. I guess I don't google political stuff too often
I hate Google for 1 reason: it mindlessly recommends journalism over all other content.
The internet has this great benefit over other forms of media that anyone can post information easily for anyone to see, it allows experts to create a website and share information to you. Instead Google prefers to give this role to clueless journalists who have no knowledge on the subject, who talk to under qualified “experts”, and who give a barebones and often incorrect summary on what you want. I want content made with passion, not content spat out for a commission
I want the ideas, not commentary on the ideas
@@KyriosHeptagrammaton sound good
good point
"journalism" if that's what it can even be called anymore
What engine do you recommend?
I wanna see more fragmentation of the web like this, just how it was healthy in the 1990s.
I don't i want to see the web less fragmented, fragmentation never led to good things, only bad practices like
@@diablo.the.cheater in a capitalist society, we need as much competition as we can get or the entire economy is undermined. It's especially important in the web since it's so widely used. Have a look at Amazon's ethics if you think monopolies on the internet are a good thing.
@@NicheAsQuiche In order to prevent monopolies we'd need to actually pass legislature that prevents companies from gaining too much market share, given that both major political parties in america are hard for "laissez faire" this is extremely unlikely to happen
@@original5243 both methods work. Free market method is more resource efficient and loophole proof, but it's not gonna happen because people too lazy to make the informed decision and act on it. That doesn't invalidate my original statement though
@@original5243 We already have good antitrust laws, new laws won't fix anything. The reason being the government doesn't even enforce the laws, including the one mentioned. So if the government is in bed with the massive monopolies, how would passing new laws help? People just need to use their brains and make better decisions. We need to instill critical thinking, logic and reason, and finally responsibility into the minds of our people.
Bing: porn
Duckduckgo: image
Google: dictionary
Yandex: sauce
I like ham
Candle for weird shit 🤣
Google really isn’t good for that even because of the way they tailor search results
Yandex better
I don't agree with everything you say in your videos, but I'm really grateful to have found you. You provide a lot of useful information. Thank you.
please install gentoo while drunk
Gentoo gives me a bad enough hangover as it is
Manjaro was already challenging enough for me on the first four attempts
@@matthewferraro8020 Lol what bro 😂 you literally just have to boot from usb and basically hit install. How did it take you four tries?
@@therandomofrandom9152 first try it decided to not work. Second and Third didn't install anything or do anything because my wifi card was crap. Fourth was fine
@@matthewferraro8020 bro me too but my problem is that the rufus does not the detect the iso
I can imagine secret Russian service agents looking at a data from some random American kid
"quick, make the kid vote for the orange man, what do you mean the kid can't vote 5 times"
Ай эм Рашн Иван, ай чуз ху винс зэ илекшн энд хэк Пентагон вери изи ноу проблем
It's actually better to use public searx rather than host your own (assuming you would be the only user of your own instance) since the search engines can't build a profile around searches of multiple people. If you are the only user of the searx instance, using searx isn't much different than just googling normally (except you give your data to multiple search engines at once instead of one).
At least this is how I understood this from when I looked into searx some time ago.
yea, that's exactly what I was thinking. Maybe could even be used to fingerprint you more accurately. I don't know how it actually works so I could be completely wrong
@Sic Semper Mortem Tyrannis yeah but if the ip of the server is same for all your queries it's the same as if they came straight from your computer. Google etc. can build their fingerprints for your server which represents you since the queries only come from you.
@Sic Semper Mortem Tyrannis You don't get my point, it doesn't matter where the instance is as long as you are the only user all the queries that go trough are yours and yours only meaning google can build profile just based on all the queries that go trough. If you however use public instance google can't connect all the traffic to you and you only since it comes from multiple people. It doesn't matter whether the queries come from your home ip or server ip google can build the profile just as well. Whether it can connect the profile to you or not that's different case.
@Sic Semper Mortem Tyrannis So? what does it matter whether they come from server or your local ip? The queries come from one ip and can be connected to build profile. You don't seem to understand what I am trying to say here or you simply refuse to belive that google can connect profile made with different ip to you.
@Sic Semper Mortem Tyrannis 🤓
I'm incredibly disheartened by Google/Alphabet. I've been working in web stuff for going on 30 years and up until around 2012 or so I was a huge believer in Google. However, over the past decade things have vastly gotten out of control and their actions are beyond acceptable. As an example, the year they started charging for their maps API was a huge eye opener. Our company went from paying nothing to almost 20 grand a month. To make matters worse we spent the better part of a decade integrating their mapping software into our work. Sure, I get they need to get paid and all, but... it was just absurdity. Thankfully Google is actually very stupid in their ability to foresee their own actions, so we were still able to hack a free mapping account of them, but still... just pathetic.
here here! I agree totally! It's just my opinion but, people that don't care at all about their privacy, are very stupid to me.
@@yahchile7681 How can you say that whilst using RUclips? Outrageous!
If it were a private user forced to pay, I'd be outraged, but a company being billed is perfectly reasonable. The whole "it used to be free" thing sounds like whining.
I have personally set up my own searx instance. Works very well for me, but can be a bit slow at times (this is hardware limitation though and nothing to do with the product itself.) Easily maintainable, customization and open-source, what's not to love? :-)
Sounds really cool
i cant take this comment seriously when you have a DDG profile picture haha
I'm curious how that works, since the searx searches are coming from your home network, couldn't they be connected to you?
@@oreos3174 lol, yeah I thought of that. This post was made a while back, and I thought of this potensial security flaw. It's been running on a VPS for quite a while now 💀
@@jonasskany6708 probably a good idea
One good thing about Yandex is that it works better in Russian than google and gives better results
nope
@@flexagonpark5467 elaborate
@@umamifan I am Russian and I used both, they are the same, but Yandex sometimes advertises partner services without marking search results as an ad
@@flexagonpark5467 did Yandex get so bad or did google finally become useful, because before the difference was night and day
@@misham6547 google got much better, but actually I use DuckDuckGo, it's good in 95% of the cases
Bing is the most direct large search result, Google is the most "guided" search and they push what they think you are looking for by context rather the direct search quotes
Which is why google is usually much better. There's also google assistant which far and away the best voice assistant
This makes me remember AltaVista, Ask Jeeves, Lycos, Webcrawler, ...
But that was back when Google was actually good. They got too comfortable and self-nerfed
"Bing is probably the search engine of choice for pirates."
Thanks for the shout out. Looking forward to working with you again.
With google images, you can click "tools" right next to "settings" and get a similar set of options for filtering images. bing is still more robust, however.
Thx I was looking for this comment. surprised he didn't know this, cause he's good at using google's engine
yeah that was genuinely pretty embarrassing lol
>duck is based
Video aged badly
what happened
I came here after duckduckgo stopped being baste and redpilled lol
What search engine would you recommend?
what happened
I didn't even know that Swisscows even existed until now. I'll have to try it out. Thanks, Kenny!
My favorite tech youtuber uploads again.
>SearX has GPL license
>calls it "open source"
STALLMAN-ESQUE SCREECHING
Why isn't GPL open source?
JOIN US NOW AND SHARE THE SOFTWARE
L I B R E
@@johnwhite7700 it's not open source. it's FREE. FREE I TELL YOU
@@smhsophie Ahh, mandatory freedom, now i see. Btw this isn't a con if you're not a company
It’s a self limiting process, once all other small search engines become big, they’ll be forced to follow these rules too.
I prefer bing because of its similar calculator/conversion calculator to google, and also has a built-in molecule visualiser when you look up any chemical formula. Also the rewards program is a massive plus.
When I search for chemical formulas in bing I just get similar results to the google ones, in slightly more ugly. No visualizer there
also it shows me trending search results that do not interest me, Google shows me my last search results instead.
Also google has the same conversion things as bing, but also adds integrated stuff like a guitar tuner, a metronome, random generators, colour pickers, etc. Google also doesn't load an image in the background and weird news that don't interest you, it's way cleaner in terms of looks, and also has a dark mode.
@@kipchickensout Yeah, the molecule visualiser seems to have disappeared since I made my comment. Google's calculator is also much better, offering a calculation history and more trig functions.
I almost never load the actual frontpage of bing as I have it set as my default search engine in my browser, and I had never noticed the "trending search results" before, and now that I notice them, they're fairly obtrusive.
News and background image can be disabled in the hamburger menu, but it doesn't seem to remember my preferences, even when I'm signed into my Microsoft account.
Not having a native dark mode doesn't really affect me, I already use dark reader on almost every page.
@@lwinklly R. I. P. well use what you like to use, right
@@kipchickensout smh
@@pepi8433 ?
IT GLOWS A DIFFERENT COLOR HOLY LLOL
I actually found Yandex by accident, but ended up really enjoying the experience
10/10 would recommend 👌
4:20 with Google you can click on tools next to settings instead and it has those built in filters on the page just like Bing btw
Ah yes the daily stormer where I get all my non biased-, factual and accurate information
Unironically
Where tf else are you going to get it? From former CIA ops on CNN and Fox?
I’d trust that over censored lies
Either way, I don't really want a search engine deciding that it doesn't want me to visit some sites.
I never knew Yandex Image Search was so godlike. You sir, changed my life.
I host my own Searx at home and access it with reverse ssh proxy. Catch that glowies
I like your funny words, magic man
@@Svvicu
Fr, no idea what they're saying 😂
DuckDuckGo is not safe anymore
You forgot Ecosia!
The search engine that plants trees.
Where does it stand on privacy??
@@vijaysridhar351 Is based on bing results, but with less tracking and a good cause! / Not full privacy oriented, but definitely better than google, yandex, and even bing itself! :)
@@SteveVedder122 why do you think so?
@@SteveVedder122 is that because of bad results ??
@@ルシアン-k1y servers generate an 'eap of co2 to feed the trees
Yandex's reverse search is way too useful XD
in my personal expitiense google dropped from the best searche engine to the worst. Search results only partually relevant, reverse image search is hella awful, regualr image search is awfull aswell, news tab is missleading and havely censored. Yandex is as spooky as google but their reverse search engine is 100% top notch, works as a charm.
Google reverse image search becomes Google Lens which is worst. Yandex is much better for this purpose.
Look up the different autoccomplete results for ''Hillary Clinton is'' in different engines.
Literally so no difference. I guess google didn’t give me recommended searches but that’s it.
Then thr Buzzfeed news about Google's manipulation of search suggestions broke, I tested it for myself. "Hillary Clinton ind" auto-completed to Hillary Clinton India, and not Hillary Clinton Indictment, which is what I got from Bing. Switched to DuckDuckGo that day and never looked back.
Autocomplete is filled by your cookies and history tho...
I got on Bing "Hillary Clinton isst kinder" which means Hillary Clinton eats kids. Wtf
@@stueyphone That's part of the Qanon conspiracy theory that's getting more popular with the far right. One of their beliefs is that Hillary Clinton murders and eats babies.
I've began using StartPage ever since I saw you recommend it, and I really love the safety and privacy/anonymity features it has. I don't miss Google at all!
Wow I’m really surprised hearing someone recommended bing over google
(besides Microsoft)
Bings good if you're an xbox gamer because you can get free gift cards from bing rewards. That's the only reason I've ever used it
From the thumbnail, it looks like having a letter as the logo means it’s bad
letters bad, animal and body part logos good
Alphabet logos are always a bad sign
@@kosherkingofisrael6381 And that's with anything
Yes, yandex reverse image search is great, that and tineye are my go-to when I'm searching images
I use Ecosia because the plant trees every 45 searches (or at least around that) and that might seem like a lot but you have to consider how many searches there are, and also, it’s somewhat private and you can actually turn on full privacy somewhere in the settings, where that is, I am not sure
It's pure green-washing. The servers generate way more co2 that the surviving trees will absorb.
I highly recommand that you look at the way the money is used... Most of it go to shady one man start-up with very low capital.
A part of the money just disappear and most of the trees that got planted die very quickly.
It's purely a commercial argument, you will not save the planet while researching porn.
It's not a good reason to be tracked.
Ecosia is basically Microsoft Bing except rebranded and marketed towards climate alarmists! Yay!
@@rollinontheboard well, the B corp certification and the reported 165 million+ trees planted (admittedly, they are the ones reporting the amount planted, but B lab IS respectable nonprofit) to mean SOMETHING, right?
also, this took a long time to reply because i had no knowledge you replied
@@DuoVersal I like trees
@@rollinontheboard …okay?
If I was a young man I'd be more concerned about privacy, but it is worrisome that information is piliticized or filtered in any way.
This is especially important for scientific information, but it's good to know the shadings can occur for any kind of information. You can learn the search engine command lines for more advanced searches as well.
turns out duckduckgo glows as brightly as bing
searched 13/50 and got the FBI knocking on my door the next day...
Why are you using an Asian chick as your pfp?
You should mention that if you're looking to get your hands on some games through morally gray means that Yandex is much better. They are much more likely to show you rutracker or some other actually useful website than the other search engines you showed.
😂
If you're looking for free malware they're also more helpful
@@ararune3734 if you're older than 11 you shouldn't be afraid of this lol
@@sharoyveduchi If you have a brain on the other hand, you should be wary of software from unknown sources.
@@ararune3734 you must be the type of guy who thinks a Linux distro like Trisequel isn't trust worthy because it's not a brand name
Duckduckgo got pozzed with the Russian war
I love your content. Its taught me so much. I wish you happiness and good health.
Good reason to use privacy search engine: for identical request it gives you identical results, even on different computer at different time.
why is that a good reason, exept if you want to see the same sh*t over and over again lol
@@rpe Sometimes this is what I actually need. I found good internet resource, and I know, the next time I search the Internet - I find it again. Only search string needs to be remembered.
@@123creator7 cool
I run a small electronics company , I use Petal (Huawei's search engine) . because 1. there is nothing I know that Huawei doesn't know way better 2. I'm totally sure they won't go running to Washington with my data 3. it gets noticeably better over time 4. The text is easy on my older eyes.
You forgot about Ecosia, which is a private search engine that plants trees with its profit
stumbled upon your channel yesterday...awesome content man!
It’s amazing how much more useful Google was 10 years ago before they started to continuously self nerf
Thanks for reminding me about Swisscows again! I'd known about it before but forgotten it. Goodbye Brave. You've got a lot of good content Mental Outlaw, I keep seeing your 4 eyed cat face covering many topics that interest me, it's about time I subbed. 😎
you dont need to click advanced options in google for filtering images, if you click on tools a bar super similar to bing will appear
Once I uploaded my brother's face to the yandex image search thing and it found a video with 20 views from 2 years ago that he was a part of. It's freakishly good, and also absolutely terrifying.
What about Qwant?
They are not anti censorship but still a candidate for modularization for me. I use it once every few weeks on my "Google only" browser. Response time is sometimes shitty, but result quality is good enough for me.
I love your channel man it’s so great
Conclusion: Just use a multitude of them because none of them are perfect.
A meta-search-engine kind-of does that. It submits your query to a bunch of engines, gets the results and filters out the duplicates. The video specifically mentions searx as an example of such an engine.
@@Roxor128 used Searx for a few weeks. It really isnt that intuitive for daily uses. And the results also lack the visibilty of quick cards and info-at-a-glance sections... like COVID cases or movie ratings.
Searx is good for those research based queries tho
@@gurubhaktmohit Er, what exactly constitutes a "daily use" for a search engine?
@@Roxor128 doing a quick search for some instant info...
Like movie timings, weather, quick how-to's, etc.
Cant really expect us to use Searx for that, can you? I hope you understand why
@@gurubhaktmohit So, basically, when you're not looking for something with any significant detail, then?
Swisscow was one of those things that I accidentally stumbled upon when looking for alternative, gotta say. I love how considerate the name it is on it's own lol.
I could hear the smile on your face when you said "although it glows a different color than the intelligence agencies in America "
First time hearing of searx. What an awesome tool- thank you for the video!
You're the best bro I like your channel ❤️👍
Thank you. I was never with it except for maybe computer stuff but now more and more I find it hard to care for keeping up to date. E.g. I still mostly use email than texting. Thanks for this vid.
This did not age well
I like that you said "created equally" instead of "created equal".
"They will do whatever spooky sh*t they please"😂😂
kagi is the revolution. I’m surprised that you or HatedOne haven’t covered it yet :-)
"no results for porn"
Who can dislike this search engine? )))
Coomers
Non Christians or Muslims.
@@belstar1128 Do you really think there are that many religious people that don't coom to porn?
@@BjornsTIR nonchristians do think it be like that
@@BjornsTIR Regular church-goers don’t coom to p*rn.
Startpage is an interesting one since it basically just forwards your search to google and gives you the results without giving google your context data
your example is the daily stormer bruh
I love ur videos. Pls never change
If only people realised how politically biased Google was. I would not doubt that they are a significant contributor to today's political polarisation.
DDG Hasn't aged too well
DuckDuckGo is now as bad as Google
True, they works with Microsoft
While what you said is all well and good which one get's you closest to the mythical "core" of the internet? Closest I ever felt to finding it was back when search engines used to be kinda "stupid" and would throw out technically inaccurate results that would amazingly somehow hit on exactly what you're looking for.
Just because a search engine has less spyware and gives the bioluminescent less info (SUPERMASSIVE doubt) doesn't mean it's any good since admittedly search engines by their very function is either outright spyware or so immediately adjacent you might as well call it spyware.
Great info! One thing I will mention is google image search has the same filtering functions as Bing for years. It just under the tools button.
Another thing I'm curious about is the quality of results in general from google. I personally have never had issues finding anything and I use it regularly for work in IT. I haven't tried the other search engines much but only mainly because I generally can find what I'm looking for. Sometimes if what I want doesn't come up I can just rephrase my query a different way and that does the trick normally. I'm fully engrossed in the google eco system so privacy from them is almost a joke if I tried to keep it I guess. Would be nice if they offered more options to be respectful of that but it really is partly my fault as well for just letting them collect all my data lol
To bad duck duck go owner bragging about being prejudice last week...
Goodbye duck duck gone !
What about Qwant? New to the channel btw, good shit. Considering popping my OS cherry and installing Linux. Just worried about DAW's not working (except for BitWig, I guess).
How to use IG in a safe way could be a good video idea, something like the mpv thing for youtube
Use Barinsta or instander
@@Ale-pk6td i'll look it up, thanks 😊
I’m so shocked that Daily Stormer actually shows up with Bing…and it’s the top result, wtf!???
Early to the new vid yay
Funny that first thing he had to show as example was Daily Stormer.
RIP DDGO
Thank you for elaborating on the "handiness" of said search engines. 👍👍👍👍
Yandex is dope af 👌
Alice rocks!
The only search engine that stopped Google. In Russia Google is losing, lol.
What really freaks you out is the automatic video translations. Just...how fo thry do that? Their technology is insane.
I subscribed. Top content IMO, thanks!
I never bothered myself with search engine that I used but maybe it's time that I do.
I used to use Google, I'm going to try DuckDuckGo now
1:22 Best bet if you want more privacy with Google search is to use a new private window and a VPN so it can't tie your search to your cookie or your IP. I use StartPage instead of Google many times because StartPage gets the search results from the Google system but they don't tailor the results to you and it's more private.