Nice video, but with incorrect information. These are manual photography lenses adapted to better work on video productions (they have a focus ring around them so they can work with follow focus'). They do breathe quite a lot, but they have excellent optical performance (sharp, no CA, low distortion), a long focus throw and lovely focus fall-off, which is why they are very attractive to many videographers/cinematographers. Worth noting that the ones used in this video are the Nikon ZF version - the focus wheel turns the opposite direction which is a massive headache for those used to years of building muscle memory focusing the other way. Some say the Otus was a blueprint for the Zeiss Supreme cinema lenses (similar optical characteristics, though the Supremes offer a wider range of focal lengths).
I get that they're popular with filmmakers but they were originally made for stills, which is what I use them for. Why adapt the Nikon versions to EF? Why not just use the EF versions? Is that something to do with the aperture rings?
Thanks for the video and sample footage. Just a heads up, I believe these are the Nikon mount (not EF). I believe that the Nikon mounts have the manual aperture control, whereas the Canon can only be changed via electronics. I would love to know which adapter you were using for the EF to Nikon and if it felt solid/you needed any lens support.
Indeed you are correct! Sorry for the confusion, it was an in house -EF Hard Mount Conversion (Nikon to EF conversion) they utilized on the set. Not sure the adapter manufacturer they used though
@@StephenBell_video Small doc project, music video, some tourism work, lots of testing as well :) ... So far they really seem to perform extremely well. I am coming from the CP2s, and from those they seem to be a huge upgrade in the optics department. My two biggest complaints with the CP2s are the CA/fringing in backlit situations and loosing contrast in backlit situations. The Otus(es) seem to sort both of these out quite well. Looking forward to many projects ahead with them!
@@JasonCohenphoto Awesome, the Otus(es) were my favourite of the recent quick lens reviews we have been doing with Canada FIlm Equipment. I love the coloring and subtle flaring they give as well
I didn’t notice too much of a difference on the 85 and found the throw consistent for the most part? These lenses are a joy to work with using focus motors
Yep, so many inaccuracies and so much misleading information that it'd take forever to correct them all. Very dodgy camera work, more out of focus than in, shaky af and awkward framing
@@peterbakerphotography8616 that's so pitiful. if there's misinfo then say what it is u coward. it wasn't a technical review so i dont even know wtf you could possibly say. and your complaints re the camerawork are canned af. why not make something yourself instead of just bein a lil hater
so... those typical super high end commercials that people can see at big events during breaks, on huge billboard at town center, at highways, they were done by otus and people like you guys this product line is really really suitable for corporate work and commercials, clean and precision
CANNOT WAIT to shoot a feature or commercial using these Zeiss Cine Prime Lenses! Anyone shoot on Zeiss primes using the Canon C70?
Nice video, but with incorrect information. These are manual photography lenses adapted to better work on video productions (they have a focus ring around them so they can work with follow focus'). They do breathe quite a lot, but they have excellent optical performance (sharp, no CA, low distortion), a long focus throw and lovely focus fall-off, which is why they are very attractive to many videographers/cinematographers. Worth noting that the ones used in this video are the Nikon ZF version - the focus wheel turns the opposite direction which is a massive headache for those used to years of building muscle memory focusing the other way. Some say the Otus was a blueprint for the Zeiss Supreme cinema lenses (similar optical characteristics, though the Supremes offer a wider range of focal lengths).
I get that they're popular with filmmakers but they were originally made for stills, which is what I use them for. Why adapt the Nikon versions to EF? Why not just use the EF versions? Is that something to do with the aperture rings?
The build quality and rings are my idea why they were adapted. They are really beautiful lenses and give a vintage feel to the footage
yes Nikon versions have aperture rings that can be ceclicked that is why they adapt the Nikon version
How about focus breathing
Surprisingly minimal given the lens size
Thanks for the video and sample footage. Just a heads up, I believe these are the Nikon mount (not EF). I believe that the Nikon mounts have the manual aperture control, whereas the Canon can only be changed via electronics. I would love to know which adapter you were using for the EF to Nikon and if it felt solid/you needed any lens support.
Indeed you are correct! Sorry for the confusion, it was an in house -EF Hard Mount Conversion (Nikon to EF conversion) they utilized on the set. Not sure the adapter manufacturer they used though
@@StephenBell_video Thanks for the clarification and that makes sense! I ended up picking up a set and they have been pretty fantastic so far!
@@JasonCohenphoto amazing! What have you shot with them so far?
@@StephenBell_video Small doc project, music video, some tourism work, lots of testing as well :) ... So far they really seem to perform extremely well. I am coming from the CP2s, and from those they seem to be a huge upgrade in the optics department. My two biggest complaints with the CP2s are the CA/fringing in backlit situations and loosing contrast in backlit situations. The Otus(es) seem to sort both of these out quite well. Looking forward to many projects ahead with them!
@@JasonCohenphoto Awesome, the Otus(es) were my favourite of the recent quick lens reviews we have been doing with Canada FIlm Equipment. I love the coloring and subtle flaring they give as well
Hello, so the focus throw is Nikon direction ?
The focus throw is regular direction I believe
yes it is the Nikon direction
@@Auteur_Vision Ahahahah thanks for the update ;) Are you still loving those glass ?
How much are these?
They are a custom build, but ordering through Otus they are around $5k CAD per lens
I have both 55 and 85 and find the dampening on focusing ring (noticeably) looser on 85 (or tighter on 55). Do you experience this?
I didn’t notice too much of a difference on the 85 and found the throw consistent for the most part? These lenses are a joy to work with using focus motors
@@StephenBell_video Looks like I gotta visit the service center then, I’m using it for photography so no gears but yes, great lens.
@@rendyonline it could be loose - best of luck with the lens!
Yes the 55 is a bit looser on the 85.
I’ve had both
@@wilhelmrosenthal1305 I guess you meant the ring is looser on the 85? But good to know you're experiencing the same
These are photography lenses bro…
You can use photography lenses for filmmaking too...bro.
Kids talking
Thanks for making me feel young, old man :)
Yep, so many inaccuracies and so much misleading information that it'd take forever to correct them all. Very dodgy camera work, more out of focus than in, shaky af and awkward framing
@@peterbakerphotography8616 that's so pitiful. if there's misinfo then say what it is u coward. it wasn't a technical review so i dont even know wtf you could possibly say. and your complaints re the camerawork are canned af.
why not make something yourself instead of just bein a lil hater
These are Nikon F mount bro…
so...
those typical super high end commercials that people can see at big events during breaks, on huge billboard at town center, at highways, they were done by otus and people like you guys
this product line is really really suitable for corporate work and commercials, clean and precision
These are beautiful lenses and definitely versatile in multiple formats and shooting styles!