Metal has always been recycled. Wer still using metals from the bronze age. It's cheaper to recycle than It is to refine. It's not new. It's not eco. It's basic, ancient economics. We don't frow away metal.
Why didn't they just smash a plane into the building? It would have burned for 20 minutes before imploding in on its own footprint. Or can you only change the laws of physics on days that end in "11th"?
This was the former Union Carbide building. A modernist touchstone. It's loss is extraordinary, because it's achievement was extraordinary, and will not be repeated.
Never mind the other replies. International Style and mid-century buildings are under appreciated for the stamp they made on our modernist world. This was a Skidmore Owings Merril building, and it was emblematic of the period. It is a terrible loss, and the building that replaces it is vulgar, lacks restraint, and looks like it was buiilt in the worst of 1990s architectural style.
That was my first thought when he called it eco friendly. To take apart that building floor by floor by hand must have been the most expensive demolition per floor.
So your saying if I dumped a pile of sand on a hot fresh pizza, you'd pick all the tiny grains of sand out; rather than throw it out and make a new one. Building have a shelf.
@@rxb364 I'm curious. If you bought a building in July, how long would you wait to insure it? Because having a new insurance policy in place for the massive buildings you just bought a few months before seems like something anyone with half a brain would do, rather than a sign that he's in on some massive conspiracy.
@@CSpottsGaming insured against terrorism! How many insure for terrorism and then bang it happens. Also he tried to put two claims in for double the money but the insurance said no, it was one event .
@@rxb364 People who own very high profile buildings, particularly buildings that HAD ALREADY BEEN THE TARGET OF TERRORIST ATTACKS. You may not be aware of this because you don't bother to do any research but the WTC was bombed in 1993, so when Silverstein bought them in July 2001, it would seem quite natural to insure them against a terrorist attack. The US government and the ultra wealthy do plenty of verifiably fucked up things, you don't need to create a conspiracy to criticize them, you can just look to the things they aren't bothering to hide.
Chase who operates and own building doesn't want it anymore, new Taller 1382 feet tall building already topped out with entire 60 floors occupied by Chase Worlds Headquarters only!!! Building is have 72 built floor including cellar, mezzanine, and mechanical floors!!! New tower have setbacks and will have Art Deco looking stylied facade.
Much better than wiring a few buildings with thermite - flying some planes into them and then setting off the explosion with thousands of people still inside the buildings.
That contractor needs to contact the san Francisco department of building and safety to start working on a bid to take down the leaning tower there. But there is an unfinished leaning tower in new york
Probably cost 3-5 times as much as a demolition by dynamite..but seems a little tight to try that without expensive containment so I wonder how all the other old towers are gonna be demolished if it costs so bloody much. Maybe revamping the structure and renos weren’t feasible?
Sure, it might have been eco in the sense you recycled a lot. But i bet this was one of the most expensive demolition projects in the history per floor. Since each floor had to be dismantled literally by hand floor by floor.
You just scratch the surface of the Deep State. A new independent professional investigation needs to take place on what really happened on September 11th, 2001. None of the physics adds up that morning. The Pentagon is obvious that no Boeing aircraft disappeared into the structure.
It’s the Old JPMorgan headquarters building. Making way for the new headquarter building at the same site. The construction is already halfway through.
All he said was lead paint and asbestos. Sometimes you reach a point where it costs more to renovate a building than to demolish it and build a new one. He said they were also able to recycle ie steel from beams and girders.
Well I just a bunch of thermite explosion on each floor and a plane flying through is an effective way but of course there was nothing left but ashes and dust but that would be a demolition for sure a controlled Demolition and that's what it was have a nice day
Interesting did u know engineers in sf have found way to straightened leaning building they are gonna use water to straightened then high strength concrete to stabilize brand new technology power of water
Apparently they couldn't reuse the building which would have been fsr better instead. And the largest "voluntary" demolition? 🤨 Weren't two 1300-ft tall skyscrapers demolished by Middle Eastern volunteers? 🤔
The TALLEST "voluntary"demolition? Hmmmmmm
Better than a RUD(rapid unscheduled disassembly)
😂😂😂
I was wondering the same thing, 9/11.
Yeah because no way the “twin towers” would have been approved of classic demo,
Besides they didn’t comedown in a “controlled way” obviously 😂
@@zockblattshickleblender7758 yup .. like the saying if it looks like a duck, sounds like a duck, quacks like a duck .... 🤩
it just takes 2 planes
goddamn that was dark.
Too soon
Nah, just 1 per building.
@@TheProptechScoutTrust me, as a New Yorker, I’ve made darker 9/11 jokes.
@@DangerIncFilms same
I was wondering why he said "Largest VOLUNTARY demolition" and then I realised.
Holy shit now I just realised
Yt Dimitri Khalizov playlist 47
I just knew the comments wouldn't let me down. 😊
That’s cool 90% recycled! Thank you humanity for being this responsible
You're welcome.
Im welcomed
Metal has always been recycled. Wer still using metals from the bronze age. It's cheaper to recycle than It is to refine. It's not new. It's not eco. It's basic, ancient economics. We don't frow away metal.
We don’t talk about the largest involuntary one
Building it is impressive, but taking it down is even more impressive.
George & Dick give this two thumbs up! 👍🏼👍🏼
Jet fuel can't melt steel beams...
it can weaken it.
George W Bush Has Entered The Chat
LOL
And Larry Silverstein pull it 😂
Why didn't they just smash a plane into the building? It would have burned for 20 minutes before imploding in on its own footprint. Or can you only change the laws of physics on days that end in "11th"?
🤣😂😝😂😝🤣. I agree, they play us as fools.
You could do all that, or just fly an aircraft into it. Apparently that also causes a perfect demolition 😉
Nine11 = 2 planes BUT 3 skyscrapers went down. Look it up from non-censored sources.
R U M B L E would be the best source seeing that yt has deleted my reply to you twice now.
An 8 buildings were destroyed
Building 7 was a voluntary demolition.
key word here is "voluntary"
Well, the terrorists "voluntarily" flew the planes into the towers
Just fly a plane into it apparently they fall straight down into a neat little 4 story pile
A neat 15 acres of debris
Technically the demolition of those two towers that looked very similar was also voluntary.
Yt Dimitri Khalizov playlist 47
Ask the 9/11 commission.
Bruh 😂
Why, they lie.
This was the former Union Carbide building. A modernist touchstone. It's loss is extraordinary, because it's achievement was extraordinary, and will not be repeated.
It was a meh example of a style with better examples within a few blocks. Anyway, it was neither yours or mine, so neither of our opinions matter.
Ah yes, a literal rectangle.
@@guywhocommentsEverything matters to the mind it matters to.
Pretty much half the buildings in New York look the same. Seagram Building, Lever House, etc.
Never mind the other replies. International Style and mid-century buildings are under appreciated for the stamp they made on our modernist world. This was a Skidmore Owings Merril building, and it was emblematic of the period. It is a terrible loss, and the building that replaces it is vulgar, lacks restraint, and looks like it was buiilt in the worst of 1990s architectural style.
Bet that was expensive!!
About 3.50
That was my first thought when he called it eco friendly. To take apart that building floor by floor by hand must have been the most expensive demolition per floor.
Acetylene torches? No
Jet fuel? Yes
I can't see how it cost less to tear down and build new instead of upgrading/adding on!
JP Morgan, hes got money bro!! One of the alleged owners of the Federal Reserve Bank.
So your saying if I dumped a pile of sand on a hot fresh pizza, you'd pick all the tiny grains of sand out; rather than throw it out and make a new one. Building have a shelf.
I know a bigger demolition... It was actually 2 buildings.. no wait,
.3 buildings.
Paint iron ferrite in the hallways stair wells taking insurance policy double a day before it happened
SHES SO BEAUTIFUL WHY DEMOLITION
Kudos to the team for minimising the waste stream.
We dont landfill metal. Never have. Never will. Its always recycled. It's not new and it's not eco.
The cost must have been RIDICULOUS.
Yes that's why planes are used followed by an insurance claim,,
Nah the CIA holds that record bro
Also the site of the largest “involuntary”demolition as well.
Nah that one was voluntary
@@vitsadelhole yes by the owner who just had it insured for billions !?!?
@@rxb364 I'm curious. If you bought a building in July, how long would you wait to insure it?
Because having a new insurance policy in place for the massive buildings you just bought a few months before seems like something anyone with half a brain would do, rather than a sign that he's in on some massive conspiracy.
@@CSpottsGaming insured against terrorism! How many insure for terrorism and then bang it happens. Also he tried to put two claims in for double the money but the insurance said no, it was one event .
@@rxb364 People who own very high profile buildings, particularly buildings that HAD ALREADY BEEN THE TARGET OF TERRORIST ATTACKS.
You may not be aware of this because you don't bother to do any research but the WTC was bombed in 1993, so when Silverstein bought them in July 2001, it would seem quite natural to insure them against a terrorist attack.
The US government and the ultra wealthy do plenty of verifiably fucked up things, you don't need to create a conspiracy to criticize them, you can just look to the things they aren't bothering to hide.
Sure buddy whose apartment was next door with the window open appreciated all the lead particles floating into his cereal in the morning.
When the demolition costed more than construction !
Takes 2 planes and seconds these days 😢
I missed the part when he said WHY they were doing it
bc the building was old? bc they wanted a new one? idk man normal demolition stuff lol
Chase who operates and own building doesn't want it anymore, new Taller 1382 feet tall building already topped out with entire 60 floors occupied by Chase Worlds Headquarters only!!! Building is have 72 built floor including cellar, mezzanine, and mechanical floors!!! New tower have setbacks and will have Art Deco looking stylied facade.
@@JackArkitekt thanks!
That building was damaged during 911.
@@wyomingadventuresthat's a more selfless explanation, thanks very much!
Much better than wiring a few buildings with thermite - flying some planes into them and then setting off the explosion with thousands of people still inside the buildings.
That contractor needs to contact the san Francisco department of building and safety to start working on a bid to take down the leaning tower there. But there is an unfinished leaning tower in new york
This shit is fucking hilarious. Thank you for sharing this story.
The entire city of San Francisco needs to be demolished
@@Nonyabusiness111 you know how much wealth that area represents, mate?
World's largest removal of forensic evidenced.
You just wonder why the normal demolition method was not used in Manhattan.
the "most eco friendly demolition" is no demolition
It's surprising that they couldn't rehab it profitably. The exterior looks OK.
Those words asbestos and lead paint I think are the story there.
@@RaysGuidesales pitch!
Worked at 270 from 10/2010 to 11/2011… had a cool lobby…
Why was this building no longer desirable?
@@BrettELothropIt was 60 years old by the time of demolition. Plus, it kinda looks pretty boring ngl
Or, just crash a large plane fully loaded with fuel... might not be as echo friendly... ask the terrorists for details.
funny
😮. Looks very efficient and controlled. Good job NY.
Why was it demolished if the building was actually new
60 years old = New
Give me a break.
The fact That you used the word voluntary is I don't know how to explain ...dark maybe
Why??
@@jacobviator3118 9/11 was really voluntary
Probably cost 3-5 times as much as a demolition by dynamite..but seems a little tight to try that without expensive containment so I wonder how all the other old towers are gonna be demolished if it costs so bloody much. Maybe revamping the structure and renos weren’t feasible?
Building 7 enters the chat👀
Ask the US government
It would've made more sense to demolish it Twin Towers-style
Probably 25x more expensive than just blowing it up
*PULL IT!!!*
What a waste of a perfectly good building
It was recycled in China
That’s terrible
There are so many other crumbling buildings and this one looked nice.
Actual good work. WOW.
They brought the third building down in less than a day
Good job for a bunch of volunteers.
Thank you fir sharing.
I still love New York since I live there but in the 1970s.
oh just 2 american airlines
I know it takes one plane 💀
Sure, it might have been eco in the sense you recycled a lot. But i bet this was one of the most expensive demolition projects in the history per floor. Since each floor had to be dismantled literally by hand floor by floor.
All metal is recycled. Always has been.
The largest voluntary demolition was tower 1 & 2 of the original wtc and the cost was many innocent lives plus a war we were never meant to fight.
we funded this war over a hundred billion dollars so we could sell them our fracking gas.
You just scratch the surface of the Deep State. A new independent professional investigation needs to take place on what really happened on September 11th, 2001. None of the physics adds up that morning. The Pentagon is obvious that no Boeing aircraft disappeared into the structure.
That was a terrorist attack
@@StarstruckChiroMusic *controlled demolition*
@@angelopalmieri434 Quit lying, the collapse is so easy to explain too
don't forget about the twin tower's and building #7.
Don't forget about the 343 FDNY firefighters ❤ that were murdered the morning of September 11th, 2001. Heroes each and every one of them.
On the verge of literally burning someone's house down because of this comment, thanks
Should have asked there government 911 crew
One airplane 11 and a half minutes ...geeessss
Why was it demolished?
It’s the Old JPMorgan headquarters building. Making way for the new headquarter building at the same site. The construction is already halfway through.
To start a war, and make a lot of money.
All he said was lead paint and asbestos. Sometimes you reach a point where it costs more to renovate a building than to demolish it and build a new one. He said they were also able to recycle ie steel from beams and girders.
You all making jokes about 9/11 being the biggest controlled demolition miss the point that maybe this video was made before 2001. Am'right?😅
Was it pre 911?
More money than sense.
thanks for some great news! Do you mean volunteer or voluntary?
So what you're saying is that the original plan for demolition 20 years earlier had bad gps coordinates?
Could've just called the CIA and cashed in on the insurance
Voluntary because the Twin Towers was technically the largest
How much did it cost? How much money was recovered from the sale of salvaged materials?
It costed 160 million dollars
About 2 Trillion dollars.
What's the salvage cost and demolition cost ?
Jp Morgan tears down its own building to build a new shiny one.
And people keep giving them money lolol
turn it into a homeless camp.
they would have destroyed it in 6 wks.
Well I just a bunch of thermite explosion on each floor and a plane flying through is an effective way but of course there was nothing left but ashes and dust but that would be a demolition for sure a controlled Demolition and that's what it was have a nice day
No Boeing aluminum aircraft can disappear into a 208 foot wide building twice in one day. ✈️
I thought it was the Deutsch Bank building?
Just got to fly a plane into it.
And...then what ? Is it a Park now ?
is there something like godwins law in conjunction w 9-11? if so it can be admired tight here.
Ask Mossad. They're good at skyscraper demolition.
Urban Moving System 😂
Interesting did u know engineers in sf have found way to straightened leaning building they are gonna use water to straightened then high strength concrete to stabilize brand new technology power of water
were there any 5 dancing _____ to document the event?
did the ______ who were around the tower get a message through an app hours before about demolishion?
I heard they used jet fuel in the torches to separate the beams but it didnt cut so they switched to acetylene..
eco demolition ? it took a year to demolish, using how much energy ? the carbon footprint of that must've been huge !! eco my butt.
Exactly where was the "Recycling" performed, CCP?
Are we gonna pretend 9/11 wasn’t voluntary?!?!?!
Could have just called Tony and Bruce.
I thought the twin towers was the largest voluntary demo ever. Still looks like a bomb to this day
The previous record holder was building 7
Was that bigger than the control demolition of Building 7 at the WTC?
What was the project cost??
So, Acetylene torches can melt steel beams?
No, but liquid theramite can (and did).
@@michaelpollitz9250 It got George W. Bush re-elected in 2004, also. The Deep State hard at work. Keep the masses of people in the dark.
The beams weren't melted, the media just exaggerated it, they were softened and weakened, not straight melted
@@michaelpollitz9250you should probably read my comment
Awesome work
It Looked earily similar to the South tower. , even the final stages of clean up.
Apparently they couldn't reuse the building which would have been fsr better instead.
And the largest "voluntary" demolition? 🤨 Weren't two 1300-ft tall skyscrapers demolished by Middle Eastern volunteers? 🤔
But wait all those 9/11 wish version of Alex Jones’ses?!
Bullocks!! Nothing beats September 11 brah. 😜😜✌🏾
I am so glad to hear they recycled so much of the building. As it should be!!
Not so much a demolition as a deconstruction.
I knew these comments were going to be entertaining
Nah, just NPCs parroting each other because they're about as original as Amy Schumer
@@PeruvianPotatoyou're the NPC
@@leob4403 Care to elaborate? I'm one of the few saying something genuinely new.
@@PeruvianPotato wait what are you saying that is genuinely new?
@@leob4403For one, not being a parrot and repeating the same jokes like a retarbeb walrus