Looking for books & other references mentioned in this video? Check out the video description for all the links! Want early access to videos & exclusive perks? Join our channel membership today: ruclips.net/channel/UCs_tLP3AiwYKwdUHpltJPuAjoin Question for you: What’s your biggest takeaway from this video? Let us know in the comments! ⬇
15:58 I always wondered why we couldnt do this "go" method in C# with some kind of attribute VS having to write another and another test for the same subset of logic that I could have put into 1 unified test. Humm, it really is GO HA!
10.50 yes, you have to build your code based on the cost to run the code. Fat code will cost you a lot of $$$ in the cloud, so make it thin code. Ummm, there's your next topic title, "thin code"
Speaking as someone who doesn't currently have Dan's metaphorical "clean running water"... could the "clean running water" people keep talking about it please. ;) Oooh... thanks Dan, I'm rubbish at finishing my personal projects... now I can tell people "But look, Dan North is a brilliant programming-guru and HE never finishes anything, so I'm alright" ;)
Amazing talk - right up until he called X a dumpster fire as an offhand comment at the end. That company is objectively better than its history on all measures with, what, 20% of its former staff? Surprising comment for someone that otherwise is so data-driven. Perhaps an example for people of how unexamined biases and assumptions can creep in and affect judgment.
Looking for books & other references mentioned in this video?
Check out the video description for all the links!
Want early access to videos & exclusive perks?
Join our channel membership today: ruclips.net/channel/UCs_tLP3AiwYKwdUHpltJPuAjoin
Question for you: What’s your biggest takeaway from this video? Let us know in the comments! ⬇
My man Roy at 4:51 yes!!! CI\CD, Metris and Testing talk to Roy on that topic.
15:58 I always wondered why we couldnt do this "go" method in C# with some kind of attribute VS having to write another and another test for the same subset of logic that I could have put into 1 unified test. Humm, it really is GO HA!
@@quinnjones1221 pretty sure this is the same concept as Assert Softly which is in many assertions libraries.
17:55 "We have no idea why its 97 instead of 100"
18:35 "I submitted one and left three unfinished"
Oh, where *could* those three missing things be?
10.50 yes, you have to build your code based on the cost to run the code. Fat code will cost you a lot of $$$ in the cloud, so make it thin code. Ummm, there's your next topic title, "thin code"
@@quinnjones1221 we are fat shaming code now ?
Speaking as someone who doesn't currently have Dan's metaphorical "clean running water"... could the "clean running water" people keep talking about it please. ;)
Oooh... thanks Dan, I'm rubbish at finishing my personal projects... now I can tell people "But look, Dan North is a brilliant programming-guru and HE never finishes anything, so I'm alright" ;)
Amazing talk - right up until he called X a dumpster fire as an offhand comment at the end. That company is objectively better than its history on all measures with, what, 20% of its former staff? Surprising comment for someone that otherwise is so data-driven. Perhaps an example for people of how unexamined biases and assumptions can creep in and affect judgment.