Everyone knows the real aliens are the Hungarians - as Nobel Prize winning physicist Leo Szilard revealed in the Fifties. He should of known, he was Hungarian
Im starting to think all the alien UFO ships we see in videos are former nazi designs using earth's magnetics to travel or these sphere/triangle shapes are powered by the earth's outer layers as proven by tesla to work. Our jets cannot even match these speed difference. I wonder how much of history we dont know about.
@@austinwhite3132 What are you talking about. I never said anything about the Luftwaffe. I just said that all Branches of the German Military had some kind of Wacky Nut job Projects going on. (And btw I do know about Sonderkommando Elbe)
Pulse jets are ridiculously simple, especially compared to a high-powered maritime engine. So from a cost and rate of manufacture perspective, this makes sense for a Kriegsmarine that was always short on parts.
The biggest issue with the Argus pulse jets was their low static thrust. V-1s could not take off using the jet engine alone, they required rocket assist or catapults to get airborne. Very few details are known about the Tornado as no photos exist, some sources say it had two Argus engines - which makes more sense. It used two floats from the amphibious Ju-52, but exactly how the floats and engine were configured is unknown. About all that is known with reasonable certainty is that it did reach high speed but had terrible seakeeping and would be limited to relatively smooth water. The overall concept had some merit as the Italians managed to sink several warships with much slower explosive boats. The video mentioned a maximum speed before becoming unstable - I don’t know where that statement came from as I have found no reference to that effect. However I have demonstrated that it is likely true. I built a 90cm radio controlled model of the Tornado several years ago based on the most popular rendition of the boat powered by a propeller - model jet engines either produce inadequate thrust or are too large for a semi-scale model. Up to a scale speed of about 50 knots the boat ran well but above that it could begin to porpoise badly. You can see that clearly in the video found in the link below. ruclips.net/video/zhxizF_pEOU/видео.html .
But they've got very low thrust - about 500 lbs. static - at, say, 50 mph, that's about 66 HP. You'd do better sticking a commercial outboard on the thing. Jets don't really provide a power advantage until you get up around 375 mph.
It's not leaving engineers without supervision that's the problem -- it's giving them MONEY without supervision. Without the money, they can't build an air cannon that'll fire a baseball at supersonic speeds . . . Yes, I'm lookin' at you, Destin!
pretty much why they never saw service. launcher would have to get well inside main weapon range and there is no such thing as stealth with this thing if used at night.
Even if that was somehow harder to intercept (certainly wouldve been harder to spot, but once spotted planes could probably catch it just the same), the real problem is that most of the coast of England facing France and Germany was a tall cliff. Not sure what you plan to destroy there exactly, but Im sure the British would be bemused that a naturally occurring stone wall was all they needed to defend against cutting edge Wunderwaffen.
If you're going to do more of these - look up the vessels known as "Torpedo Rams". About the only reason these vessels are even remembered is is because one is prominently featured in H.G. Wells' "The War of the Worlds" - HMS Thunder Child.
@@morriganmhor5078 No, she was a torpedo ram, though Wells was not much of a naval expert. Wells did write on of the first codified wargames though "Little Wars".
That post war rendition of the Project 5b feels a lot like "I didn't get to see my brainchild come to being during the war...lemme wait a few years so it doesn't look bad and build it anyways."
They weren't wacky,just way ahead of their time,I mean fast forward a few decades to the Vietnam war,and we had the PT boats that had maybe 2 to 3 inches of draft at full speed.
I wonder if the VS-5 was fast because of its similarities to bulbous prows, as we've since learnt that knife sharp is not what it takes to Gotta Go Fast
Hey, just a psa, the sponsor is based in Hong Kong, 1 Square foot is too small to even be sold in Scotland, and lords/ladies- aren't actually recognized by literally anyone other than this company, also, we don't know how much they donated to the charity
This was truly fascinating and for myself, an eye-opening education. I knew of the Kriegsmarine's sub and minisubs, but this was a whole new bit of "Weird War Tech". Thank you.
Plural of Schnellboot is Schnellboote, not Schnellboots :) A 70 knot boat is useless as a torpedo boat in the context of WW2 as WW2 torpedoes didn't go that fast. WW2 torpedoes were capable of at most between 40 and 50 knots, most of them sitting at the lower end of that range. For launching at higher speeds aircraft torpedoes needed braking in order to hit the water slow enough that they wouldn't break up on contact (which is why torpedo aircraft were so slow, or at the very least were capable of very slow speeds without stalling even when fully armed).
1. You draw the wrong conclusions. At 70 knots you'll produce a wake that can be seen in the dark from the moon. You won't tell everybody that you're out there until you launch you eels. Instead you wait silently in the dark in an ambush position, launch your torpedos and get the hell out of Dodge City. 2. You could set up torpedos for either range or speed, thus some torpedos exceeded 50 knots easily. Type 93 "Long Lance" comes to my mind.
The russian boats dropped torpedoes behind them, which activate after they are in the water. Surprises enemies in warthunder when you charge forward and then turn away because they don't see the following torpedoes coming.
@@orbiradio2465 it is, but that aerial torpedo doesn't get hit by the launching aircraft a split second after it hits the water :) It just drops aft and below the launching aircraft as it turns away. Can't do that with a torpedo boat.
@@jwenting There are several solution to this problem. US PT boats rolled the torpedo over the side. For tube launch note, that the speed of the launch plattform is added to the speed that is generated by the launch charge. The third solution would be launching over the stern like the early British MTB did.
hydrofoils date back over 100 years the first going back to 1906. In 1919 Alexander Graham Bell designed and had built a hydrofoil that could reach over 40 knots.
You know whats the advantage of a torpedo boat? They can get close as they are hard to spot! So how about puting a jetengine on one that can be heard from like 3km away
My old landlord invented a type of Hydrofoil design for the bottom of boats that got him a good payday from the military. He used that to build a metal machining plant and made a fortune machining parts for nuclear reactors. His name was Howard K. Dearborn, may he RIP. His Dearborn Tubular precision plant in Fryeburg Maine is called Hunting now I think. Lol... Hunting... Deer. Anyways, this got me thinking about him. Howard was an awesome mentor and I still have the very first project we worked on together. He saved me from being a useless idiot really. Gave me an interest in machining and making things myself. God bless that old timer, hope he's resting well.
He was the type of old timer who would see his tenant's kid wipe out on a bike trying to carry stuff, and teach him how to build a mounted box for his bike so it didn't happen again. A true problem solver.
6:30 The Duh question is how are you going to get close enough to shore to offload a non-floaty tank while requiring a very deep draft due to the hydrofoils.
Do you watch the video without sound? Its pretty much explained at 6:30, it doesnt offload a non floaty tank at the shore, it drops a pontoon with a tank on it close to the shore and the pontoon offloads the tank on the shore
In the years 1981-5, I saw hydrofoils in Riga, Tallinn and St. Petersburg (then Leningrad) harbours, that were rather similar to those German experiments you say that "vanished". Thus, I think I know where...
That would have been around the time that the US Navy's Pegasus-class boats operated. The first was commissioned in 1978, and these boats were decommissioned in 1993. They were fitted out with a turreted 76mm gun forward and eight Harpoon missiles aft.
The "vanished" German designs used self-stabilizing semi-submerged deep-V hydrofoils - a very simple system known since the early 1930s. Even the Soviets built a couple research crafts with it before the WW2. The 1970-90 Soviet passenger crafts of the Baltic sea you're referring to were using straight multi-layer fully-submerged hydrofoils with controlled flaps - a completely different system. You clearly have no knowledge in this area.
@@sergeychmelev5270 I have only said I saw something like. I know that Russian people discovered all that is to be, there was even the Red Book of soviet discoveries to be bought in such neosoviet republics as CSSR, Poland, Magyar soviet republic and others.
The difference between a boat and a ship is its centre of mass. While a boats top will lean inwards in a tight turning circle, a ships top will lean outwards, pointing into the opposite direction. Compare a small outboard motored fishingboat with a Gerald R Ford Class aircraftcarrier, and youll see the difference immediately @coneofarc
hydrofoils were a weird technology that everyone was absolutely convinced would change naval warfare entirely yet despite billions spent between the USSR and the Western powers very little of the technology ever went anywhere
A lot of books needs to be rewritten, torpedo ship, torpedo ship destroyer, motor torpedo ship, life ship, instead of torpedo boat, torpedo boat destroyer, motor torpedo boat, life boat. If you think the prefix HMS makes every surface vessel a ship, then submarines are ships too.
The Established Titles thing didn't work out so well. But your inclusion of links to sources is just amazing. We in the comment sections are prohibited from posting links outside RUclips by the thought police department of RUclips. If I were to post an evidentiary link, RUclips would shadow-delete the entire post without notifying either you or I, without consent. It would simply vanish, never to be seen. The only one who can post helpful links is you and I thank you for it.
Sometimes, you have to feel a little bad for the Kreigsmarine. Always getting the short end of the stick, except the stick is a 2 inch long twig, and still always blundering
I'd like to think the only reason why they didn't go through with this was because the luftwaffa hated the kreigsmarine that much as to deny them the materials and engines
Heh I wasn't expecting to see the VS-5 in this vid for would've suggested it for another vid for it's an interesting vessel that I hope one day will be added to WT.
Odd that didn’t happen to the thousands of V-1s launched across the stormy Channel into foggy England. Even if they did happen to somehow be put out momentarily, the spark plug would reignite the fuel and on they go.
Check out more videos like this in the full Sails and Salvos playlist: ruclips.net/p/PLW8JzDrsS3_t9Lg-piCJfHTq8FveTdauP
"She could sink herself like a submarine, but would be unable to move"
Yeah turns out most boats can do that trick
Yeah, but the boat still goes down.
He means that the boat could stay underwater but after submerging the engines would be useless
@@caralho5237 whoosh
@@caralho5237 damn bro, it's almost like it's a joke or something
All boats can be a submarine. Once.
Conclusion:
If you stumble upon a left behind alien vehicle, it's either left by real aliens or the Germans.
Everyone knows the real aliens are the Hungarians - as Nobel Prize winning physicist Leo Szilard revealed in the Fifties. He should of known, he was Hungarian
I have seen garage projects here that look like a fast and furious prop, it's insane what rural boredom does to a mf
You getting to close to the history channel there bud. :)
Or its a weather balloon
Im starting to think all the alien UFO ships we see in videos are former nazi designs using earth's magnetics to travel or these sphere/triangle shapes are powered by the earth's outer layers as proven by tesla to work. Our jets cannot even match these speed difference. I wonder how much of history we dont know about.
Nice to see that Wunderwaffe Madness was Branch inclusive.
This Is Madness! This is German engineering!
False
The luftwaffe had conducted suicide type missions as well check your info
@@austinwhite3132 What are you talking about. I never said anything about the Luftwaffe. I just said that all Branches of the German Military had some kind of Wacky Nut job Projects going on.
(And btw I do know about Sonderkommando Elbe)
@@yeettheheat you said branch exclusive as in it was exclusive to “A BRANCH”
Hope everyone enjoyed this one, this topic was quite a fun one!
Baltimore > Deutschland
People seriously liked this comment?
@@kuwanger12:
I do not even understand the meaning of this comment…
@@stefanpaege2046 it means that Americans have German ancestors
new phone who dis
Pulse jets are ridiculously simple, especially compared to a high-powered maritime engine. So from a cost and rate of manufacture perspective, this makes sense for a Kriegsmarine that was always short on parts.
Water injestion would be a huge problem.
@@anzaca1
No
The biggest issue with the Argus pulse jets was their low static thrust. V-1s could not take off using the jet engine alone, they required rocket assist or catapults to get airborne. Very few details are known about the Tornado as no photos exist, some sources say it had two Argus engines - which makes more sense. It used two floats from the amphibious Ju-52, but exactly how the floats and engine were configured is unknown. About all that is known with reasonable certainty is that it did reach high speed but had terrible seakeeping and would be limited to relatively smooth water. The overall concept had some merit as the Italians managed to sink several warships with much slower explosive boats.
The video mentioned a maximum speed before becoming unstable - I don’t know where that statement came from as I have found no reference to that effect. However I have demonstrated that it is likely true. I built a 90cm radio controlled model of the Tornado several years ago based on the most popular rendition of the boat powered by a propeller - model jet engines either produce inadequate thrust or are too large for a semi-scale model. Up to a scale speed of about 50 knots the boat ran well but above that it could begin to porpoise badly. You can see that clearly in the video found in the link below.
ruclips.net/video/zhxizF_pEOU/видео.html
.
@@ww748
Thanks for posting. Nice model.
But they've got very low thrust - about 500 lbs. static - at, say, 50 mph, that's about 66 HP. You'd do better sticking a commercial outboard on the thing. Jets don't really provide a power advantage until you get up around 375 mph.
And this video is yet further proof why you should never leave German engineers without supervision for too long.
That actually applies to all engineers.
heyyy come on im trust worthy
@@baronvonkaiser9912 Vertrauen ist gut, Kontrolle ist besser. ^^
@@Divran22 ja broder
It's not leaving engineers without supervision that's the problem -- it's giving them MONEY without supervision. Without the money, they can't build an air cannon that'll fire a baseball at supersonic speeds . . . Yes, I'm lookin' at you, Destin!
A sea skimming V-1 would be a better use of that pulsejet,those bomb boats seem very easy to intercept.
Sea-skimming was well beyond the technology of the time.
pretty much why they never saw service. launcher would have to get well inside main weapon range and there is no such thing as stealth with this thing if used at night.
@@anzaca1 I know.Wasting resources on something that may give results in a few decades ensures postwar work.That is what makes it better.
@@anzaca1 what about redesigning the v1 to be able to use the ground effect over the seas that's not outside of the abilities of the time
Even if that was somehow harder to intercept (certainly wouldve been harder to spot, but once spotted planes could probably catch it just the same), the real problem is that most of the coast of England facing France and Germany was a tall cliff. Not sure what you plan to destroy there exactly, but Im sure the British would be bemused that a naturally occurring stone wall was all they needed to defend against cutting edge Wunderwaffen.
Germany: radio controlled kamikaze boat
Japan: sacrifice yourself to your emperor
Could you imagine if they had these
As the immortal Yahtzee once said: These days you can't go ten seconds without hearing about something being "Schnell"
If you're going to do more of these - look up the vessels known as "Torpedo Rams". About the only reason these vessels are even remembered is is because one is prominently featured in H.G. Wells' "The War of the Worlds" - HMS Thunder Child.
Wasn´t the Thunder Child a battleship of some sort? I saw Drachinifel's piece on her.
@@morriganmhor5078 No, she was a torpedo ram, though Wells was not much of a naval expert. Wells did write on of the first codified wargames though "Little Wars".
That post war rendition of the Project 5b feels a lot like "I didn't get to see my brainchild come to being during the war...lemme wait a few years so it doesn't look bad and build it anyways."
I don't know much about ships or boats. So I will say Attack the D point
2 minutes later, and you're the only one at D because your team-mates got sunk already.
@@ottovonbismarck2443 you mean to say there actually is a D point in Naval?
Always go for the D….
Imagine hearing a pulse jet coming at you when you're in the middle of the ocean and you can't see anything in the sky
Knowing next to nothing about boats, this is a nice change and really interesting - just imagine driving the more stable ones of these too!
They weren't wacky,just way ahead of their time,I mean fast forward a few decades to the Vietnam war,and we had the PT boats that had maybe 2 to 3 inches of draft at full speed.
I wonder if the VS-5 was fast because of its similarities to bulbous prows, as we've since learnt that knife sharp is not what it takes to Gotta Go Fast
Hey, just a psa, the sponsor is based in Hong Kong, 1 Square foot is too small to even be sold in Scotland, and lords/ladies- aren't actually recognized by literally anyone other than this company, also, we don't know how much they donated to the charity
This was truly fascinating and for myself, an eye-opening education. I knew of the Kriegsmarine's sub and minisubs, but this was a whole new bit of "Weird War Tech". Thank you.
Plural of Schnellboot is Schnellboote, not Schnellboots :)
A 70 knot boat is useless as a torpedo boat in the context of WW2 as WW2 torpedoes didn't go that fast.
WW2 torpedoes were capable of at most between 40 and 50 knots, most of them sitting at the lower end of that range.
For launching at higher speeds aircraft torpedoes needed braking in order to hit the water slow enough that they wouldn't break up on contact (which is why torpedo aircraft were so slow, or at the very least were capable of very slow speeds without stalling even when fully armed).
1. You draw the wrong conclusions. At 70 knots you'll produce a wake that can be seen in the dark from the moon. You won't tell everybody that you're out there until you launch you eels. Instead you wait silently in the dark in an ambush position, launch your torpedos and get the hell out of Dodge City.
2. You could set up torpedos for either range or speed, thus some torpedos exceeded 50 knots easily. Type 93 "Long Lance" comes to my mind.
The russian boats dropped torpedoes behind them, which activate after they are in the water. Surprises enemies in warthunder when you charge forward and then turn away because they don't see the following torpedoes coming.
70kn is much less that the launch speed of aerial torpedos.
@@orbiradio2465 it is, but that aerial torpedo doesn't get hit by the launching aircraft a split second after it hits the water :)
It just drops aft and below the launching aircraft as it turns away. Can't do that with a torpedo boat.
@@jwenting There are several solution to this problem. US PT boats rolled the torpedo over the side. For tube launch note, that the speed of the launch plattform is added to the speed that is generated by the launch charge. The third solution would be launching over the stern like the early British MTB did.
Me at the start of the video: Man I should really play low tier coastal on War Thunder today, it might be fun.
Me at 4:48 : Ah, it is fate, I see.
hydrofoils date back over 100 years the first going back to 1906. In 1919 Alexander Graham Bell designed and had built a hydrofoil that could reach over 40 knots.
Pulse-jet boat? - super stealthy, an absolutely roaring success! (No water skiing without asbestos suit & earplugs : )
You know whats the advantage of a torpedo boat?
They can get close as they are hard to spot!
So how about puting a jetengine on one that can be heard from like 3km away
Very interesting topic, enjoyed it thoroughly.
VS-5 and the Schlitten I and II remind me of the David-type torpedo boats the Confederacy built during the US Civil War.
My old landlord invented a type of Hydrofoil design for the bottom of boats that got him a good payday from the military. He used that to build a metal machining plant and made a fortune machining parts for nuclear reactors. His name was Howard K. Dearborn, may he RIP. His Dearborn Tubular precision plant in Fryeburg Maine is called Hunting now I think. Lol... Hunting... Deer. Anyways, this got me thinking about him. Howard was an awesome mentor and I still have the very first project we worked on together. He saved me from being a useless idiot really. Gave me an interest in machining and making things myself. God bless that old timer, hope he's resting well.
He was the type of old timer who would see his tenant's kid wipe out on a bike trying to carry stuff, and teach him how to build a mounted box for his bike so it didn't happen again. A true problem solver.
A Katamaran Schnellboot with twin Jumo 004 Jet Turbines would be insanely fast
You call it crazy, but hydrofoils are the latest tech in high-speed boating today.
Borgward made a really beautiful car called the Isabella, which looked like Kaiser Manhattan. The coupe version was even called “The German E-Type”.
6:30 The Duh question is how are you going to get close enough to shore to offload a non-floaty tank while requiring a very deep draft due to the hydrofoils.
Do you watch the video without sound? Its pretty much explained at 6:30, it doesnt offload a non floaty tank at the shore, it drops a pontoon with a tank on it close to the shore and the pontoon offloads the tank on the shore
I like how you use war thunder footage to explain something sometimes.
Pulse-jet powered pontoon hydrofoil,
Is my next search...
In the years 1981-5, I saw hydrofoils in Riga, Tallinn and St. Petersburg (then Leningrad) harbours, that were rather similar to those German experiments you say that "vanished". Thus, I think I know where...
That would have been around the time that the US Navy's Pegasus-class boats operated. The first was commissioned in 1978, and these boats were decommissioned in 1993. They were fitted out with a turreted 76mm gun forward and eight Harpoon missiles aft.
The "vanished" German designs used self-stabilizing semi-submerged deep-V hydrofoils - a very simple system known since the early 1930s. Even the Soviets built a couple research crafts with it before the WW2. The 1970-90 Soviet passenger crafts of the Baltic sea you're referring to were using straight multi-layer fully-submerged hydrofoils with controlled flaps - a completely different system. You clearly have no knowledge in this area.
@@sergeychmelev5270 I have only said I saw something like. I know that Russian people discovered all that is to be, there was even the Red Book of soviet discoveries to be bought in such neosoviet republics as CSSR, Poland, Magyar soviet republic and others.
Imagine the hearing loss having that goddamn engine right above your head.
What?
What ?
The Project 5B looks like something straight out of sci-fi lol.
12:00 these boats remind me of the Russian G 5 Boat
The G-5 looks like a submarine
The difference between a boat and a ship is its centre of mass. While a boats top will lean inwards in a tight turning circle, a ships top will lean outwards, pointing into the opposite direction. Compare a small outboard motored fishingboat with a Gerald R Ford Class aircraftcarrier, and youll see the difference immediately @coneofarc
by that logic a personal pontoon boat is a ship, despite being 18ft in length
hydrofoils were a weird technology that everyone was absolutely convinced would change naval warfare entirely yet despite billions spent between the USSR and the Western powers very little of the technology ever went anywhere
You find the oddest things. Well done!
After the war Borgward continued as a car maker. Producing (among other Things) a amphibious car, before going bancrupt.
1:57 In the Royal Navy, at least, surface vessels are "ships", while submarines are "boats".
Depends if it is a ship or a boat, the latter leaning into the turns.
A lot of books needs to be rewritten, torpedo ship, torpedo ship destroyer, motor torpedo ship, life ship, instead of torpedo boat, torpedo boat destroyer, motor torpedo boat, life boat.
If you think the prefix HMS makes every surface vessel a ship, then submarines are ships too.
Great video and as always very interesting!
5b looks like a spaceship.
i can picture in a couple of somewheres.
Vs-10 sounds like alot of fun
Good video.
When it comes to hydrofoils, I am partial to the U.S. Navy's _Pegasus_ class.
"High speed, low drag" - Command And Conquer.
The Established Titles thing didn't work out so well. But your inclusion of links to sources is just amazing. We in the comment sections are prohibited from posting links outside RUclips by the thought police department of RUclips. If I were to post an evidentiary link, RUclips would shadow-delete the entire post without notifying either you or I, without consent. It would simply vanish, never to be seen. The only one who can post helpful links is you and I thank you for it.
Oh this a topic I love thanks for making the video
Sounds like a sensible approach
The difference between boats and ships is how they tilt when turning.
You can put a boat on a ship but not a ship on a boat.
VS-8 is very reminiscent of a contemporary USN Mk-5 special operations craft.
Sometimes, you have to feel a little bad for the Kreigsmarine. Always getting the short end of the stick, except the stick is a 2 inch long twig, and still always blundering
The next step in the impetus for speed after the hydrofoils would have to be the Soviet ekranoplan designs.
Russians used the hydrofoil design for their Raketa river passenger ships. Didn't know it was not the first practical use of hydrofoil.
The RCN tested a hydrofoil design.... HMCS Bras d'Or. Tests ran between 1868 and 1971. She was clocked at 63 Knots.
They ran tests for 103 years?
I liked the video. I’m always excited to see Sboot videos. I wish you would have taken it further to the s70 and s100 boats they were successful
1:50 this is my kingdom cone
Lots of creative weaponary idea,by their idea, l think about high speed marine design either for rescue or medical transportation design.
@11:59 The museum is located in Bremerhaven, if anyone is curious.
Day 6 of asking for a cursed by design on the SiG 15 cm Hetzer.
Was Gerry Anderson on the design team? 🤣🤣😂
After reading "V1" I was shure you ment a single cilinder engine
You would need at least two cylinders to form the V which the engine name comes from. A single cylinder would never be called a V1.
@@ConeOfArc I know, it was just my firts thought and it puzzled me.
@@ConeOfArc would be a great marketing joke
>These two may be familiar to war thunder naval players
All two of them?
The e in Marine isn't silent, it is Marineh, also the plural of Schnellboot is Schnellboote
Cone could make a video about the last poo he took and id still love it, fuck yeah, new series
I'd like to think the only reason why they didn't go through with this was because the luftwaffa hated the kreigsmarine that much as to deny them the materials and engines
Heh I wasn't expecting to see the VS-5 in this vid for would've suggested it for another vid for it's an interesting vessel that I hope one day will be added to WT.
A boat with a pulse engine 🤣🤣🤣
A well known definition of ships and boats:
A boat leans inward in a turn, a ship outwards.
You can ship boats on a ship, but you can't ship ships on a boat
Never seen pictures of these snell boats -
Maybe something on wacky Japanse WW2 boats I’d like rhat
These would make excellent 1.35 scale model kits....
I honestly thought you were showing us a drawing of a Star Wars ship with that 5V...
Turbine powered boats were first tested in the late 1930's hitting 45knots
@Retired Bore I meant jet powered boats
Kamikazi boats are awesome
😊👍
Necessity....the mother of invention!
.
MAN (Maschinenwerke auf Nuremberg) is one of my favorite acronyms, ever.
Maschinenfabrik Augsburg-Nürnberg
@@wolf310ii Thanks for the clarification.
Its been a long time since I have seen the VS-5 mentioned.
Exelent video keep up the good work 👍
I have an idea. Why stop with V1 engines? Why not build a boat that shoots V1s or even v2s?
There was a proposal for a U-Boat that could deploy V2s to attack the US.
There was a plan to collaborate with Italy to refit the battleship Impero as a strategic weapons based flat top carrier for deploying V1s
@@lordcaptainteapot6143 IIRC, the idea was a U-boat that would tow a launch platform for V-2s.
@@lordcaptainteapot6143 well, I'm a big fan
The US Navy did it after WW2, they launched a few V-1 from a u-boat
The Kingdom Cone
Ok, yeah, this deffo a cursed idea.
Drop the "Man has dreamed of mastering the seas." etc waffle.
Awesome video...enjoyed much
Ah, I remember the "Turnbinia"..
Just wanted to say i love your stuff
Nice, now expanding into naval ships.
The 5b looks like the Yuri Boomer submarine from Red Alert 2 from top down view.
*Sees thumbnail* Kreigsmarine Postal Service, sorry, no tracking numbers.
HITTING THE GAS!
Yet another unique topic... 👏👏👏
Very enjoyable video. New Sub. TY for your content. Best wishes to all!
ConeOfArc, please, try to include the metric system too in your videos
How about something about the numerous wild aircraft designs the Nazis considered in the closing months of the war?
If I purchase a plot close to you can we call it Conelandia, and hold a election our leaders could be called Cone heads
You can fit a boat onto a ship but not a ship on a boat
If we never fail, we have not tried hard enough.
Proud owner of 1 foot of land in Glencoe schotland... you may call me lord.
If those Jet Boats hit a thin wall or cloud of mist, the engines will get snuffed out instantly.
No
Odd that didn’t happen to the thousands of V-1s launched across the stormy Channel into foggy England. Even if they did happen to somehow be put out momentarily, the spark plug would reignite the fuel and on they go.
@@ww748 The spark plug is only used to start the pulsjet on the starting ramp, from a external power source, not during flight.
No matter how fast they are, they can’t outrun Motorola or an attacking plane!
What about Nokia?