Today I don't know just I serch something else but some where I told about my about what about I serch and raaab janda my mother says foolll this is my great grand father home town pindi bhatiya any my mother cry litterly and just I what they time and what a time 😇😇😇😇😘😘😍i love india
Hammare indian Punjab mai Mai Haar saal Punjabi Hindu Aur sikh Apne 13 january ko Lohri ke Tyohar pe Dulla Bhatti ( raja Rai abdulla khan bhatti Rajput ) ko yaad karte hai. Bool kuch iss tarah hai. "Sunder Munderiye ho Tera Koon Bichara ho Dulla Bhatti wala Ho DULLe Dhi Viyahi Ho"
Pindi Bhattian Sandal Baar Ki Raaj Dhani Thi. Sandal Baar Ravi Aur Chinab ke beech Ke saare Elaqe ko kete hai. Sandal Bhatti Rajput Dulle bhatti ka DaDa tha. Jiske naam pe Elaqe ko Sandal baar kete hai.
Proud to bhi bhatti rajput -Here the question was not of Hindu or Muslim, the main question was to sustain oneself in one's jagirs. If they do not get sustenance in their jagir despite being Hindus, then what is the use of religion for them? Man's religion cannot stand before hunger. Therefore, for their survival and survival they had to take refuge in Islam. If someone gave up his property in anger to protect his religion, then where would he stay? A small mistake could have displaced them. There was no one to support such people in that era. There was neither fanaticism nor religious fanaticism among the Rajputs and Muslims of that time. They did not know communalism yet. Muslims were created from among them, they had blood relations with each other some time ago, then why should they feel embarrassed? The elders had not yet forgotten their mutual marriages a few years ago. They lived together, worked together in the fields, and grazed animals together. Religion did not make them untouchable for each other. Therefore, the Kelans and other Rajputs of the western border were not ready to give up their land, property, homes, neighbors and relationships for the protection or promotion of religion. Muslims were not their enemies but their relatives of yesterday, hence most of the Kelan Bhatis and other Rajputs joined them and gradually they merged with the Muslims. In my opinion, such sentiments started coming from the time of Rao Shekha, or before him, from the time of Rao Barsal. The marriages of Rao Kelan and Chachagdev with Muslim princesses also had no less contribution in this. If the rulers loved the Muslims and did not hate them, then what objection could the subjects have in following them? His being sensitive and tolerant towards Muslims, Hindus playing in the same courtyard, children of Muslim queens, relatives coming to meet, etc. were such points due to which religious fanaticism was washed away. It had lost its sharpness. Bhatis and Muslims still have the same relations in the Pugal area, while fanatics are digging a gap of discrimination between them. Even after this, their mutual feelings and emotions remain the same as generations ago. There are about eighty percent Muslims in this area, but for the Bhatis, they are still the same people as they were four to five hundred years ago. Bhati's pain is his own pain, he openly accepts it. Reference pugal ka ithihaas page number 339
@@alibhatti9353Proud to bhi bhatti rajput -Here the question was not of Hindu or Muslim, the main question was to sustain oneself in one's jagirs. If they do not get sustenance in their jagir despite being Hindus, then what is the use of religion for them? Man's religion cannot stand before hunger. Therefore, for their survival and survival they had to take refuge in Islam. If someone gave up his property in anger to protect his religion, then where would he stay? A small mistake could have displaced them. There was no one to support such people in that era. There was neither fanaticism nor religious fanaticism among the Rajputs and Muslims of that time. They did not know communalism yet. Muslims were created from among them, they had blood relations with each other some time ago, then why should they feel embarrassed? The elders had not yet forgotten their mutual marriages a few years ago. They lived together, worked together in the fields, and grazed animals together. Religion did not make them untouchable for each other. Therefore, the Kelans and other Rajputs of the western border were not ready to give up their land, property, homes, neighbors and relationships for the protection or promotion of religion. Muslims were not their enemies but their relatives of yesterday, hence most of the Kelan Bhatis and other Rajputs joined them and gradually they merged with the Muslims. In my opinion, such sentiments started coming from the time of Rao Shekha, or before him, from the time of Rao Barsal. The marriages of Rao Kelan and Chachagdev with Muslim princesses also had no less contribution in this. If the rulers loved the Muslims and did not hate them, then what objection could the subjects have in following them? His being sensitive and tolerant towards Muslims, Hindus playing in the same courtyard, children of Muslim queens, relatives coming to meet, etc. were such points due to which religious fanaticism was washed away. It had lost its sharpness. Bhatis and Muslims still have the same relations in the Pugal area, while fanatics are digging a gap of discrimination between them. Even after this, their mutual feelings and emotions remain the same as generations ago. There are about eighty percent Muslims in this area, but for the Bhatis, they are still the same people as they were four to five hundred years ago. Bhati's pain is his own pain, he openly accepts it. Reference pugal ka ithihaas page number 339
pindi bhattian my favourite town screnity complac3n5
Nice video, Nice Pindi bhattiyan vlog
Thank u paa g❤❤🙏🙏
Marhaba.....☘⚘🌹🌷🍀🌸🌺👌
❤❤❤🙏🙏🙏
This is our ancestral village
Mine too 🥺
@siddharthdua836 🙌
Keep it up 👍
6Big like
Great Vlog .....
i fully suppport new youtubers....
❤❤🙏
Good job boos
Nice vdo
❤❤🙏
lovely like it
Thank u❤❤🙏
Thks for information
Thank u nehmood sb❤
Very nice video 🌹👍❤️👆👈
❤❤🙏🙏
Nice dude.
Thank u❤❤🙏
Great 👍
Thank u brother❤❤🙏
After long time good job 👍
Ohh really?? Good to see u after long time❤❤
@@DesiTravellerPK thanks 🤗
@@raj49449 yes but some time
@@raj49449 app kiya bat kerna chty hy
@@raj49449 achi bat hy per bohat
Say logo ko app ganty ho gy plz in say bat kary thanks
Nice video
🙏❤❤
❤
♥️♥️
Dulla sade punjab da sher
Today I don't know just I serch something else but some where I told about my about what about I serch and raaab janda my mother says foolll this is my great grand father home town pindi bhatiya any my mother cry litterly and just I what they time and what a time 😇😇😇😇😘😘😍i love india
Ohh so nice pay my love to her♥️♥️🙏🙏
Bht maadi gall a bht afsos a k loka nu phindu di history ne pta
Hammare indian Punjab mai Mai Haar saal Punjabi Hindu Aur sikh Apne 13 january ko Lohri ke Tyohar pe Dulla Bhatti ( raja Rai abdulla khan bhatti Rajput ) ko yaad karte hai. Bool kuch iss tarah hai.
"Sunder Munderiye ho
Tera Koon Bichara ho
Dulla Bhatti wala Ho
DULLe Dhi Viyahi Ho"
Wow thats amazinggg❤❤
Gòod
Ya city safe ha ya ni
Bhai koi gol gappy ka address bata dei
Hahaha mujhe nai malum main to sirf aik din k lie gaya tha
Pindi Bhattian Sandal Baar Ki Raaj Dhani Thi. Sandal Baar Ravi Aur Chinab ke beech Ke saare Elaqe ko kete hai. Sandal Bhatti Rajput Dulle bhatti ka DaDa tha. Jiske naam pe Elaqe ko Sandal baar kete hai.
Greatt info bro thanks❤❤
Proud to bhi bhatti rajput -Here the question was not of Hindu or Muslim, the main question was to sustain oneself in one's jagirs. If they do not get sustenance in their jagir despite being Hindus, then what is the use of religion for them? Man's religion cannot stand before hunger. Therefore, for their survival and survival they had to take refuge in Islam. If someone gave up his property in anger to protect his religion, then where would he stay? A small mistake could have displaced them. There was no one to support such people in that era. There was neither fanaticism nor religious fanaticism among the Rajputs and Muslims of that time. They did not know communalism yet. Muslims were created from among them, they had blood relations with each other some time ago, then why should they feel embarrassed? The elders had not yet forgotten their mutual marriages a few years ago. They lived together, worked together in the fields, and grazed animals together. Religion did not make them untouchable for each other. Therefore, the Kelans and other Rajputs of the western border were not ready to give up their land, property, homes, neighbors and relationships for the protection or promotion of religion. Muslims were not their enemies but their relatives of yesterday, hence most of the Kelan Bhatis and other Rajputs joined them and gradually they merged with the Muslims.
In my opinion, such sentiments started coming from the time of Rao Shekha, or before him, from the time of Rao Barsal. The marriages of Rao Kelan and Chachagdev with Muslim princesses also had no less contribution in this. If the rulers loved the Muslims and did not hate them, then what objection could the subjects have in following them? His being sensitive and tolerant towards Muslims, Hindus playing in the same courtyard, children of Muslim queens, relatives coming to meet, etc. were such points due to which religious fanaticism was washed away. It had lost its sharpness. Bhatis and Muslims still have the same relations in the Pugal area, while fanatics are digging a gap of discrimination between them. Even after this, their mutual feelings and emotions remain the same as generations ago. There are about eighty percent Muslims in this area, but for the Bhatis, they are still the same people as they were four to five hundred years ago. Bhati's pain is his own pain, he openly accepts it.
Reference pugal ka ithihaas page number 339
Bhatti Rajputs Chiefs of This Area were Always OF Baggi Nature. Also in Khalsa Raj
My city pandibhattin village partlakhan live in Istanbul turkey
I love my pandi
@@alibhatti9353Proud to bhi bhatti rajput -Here the question was not of Hindu or Muslim, the main question was to sustain oneself in one's jagirs. If they do not get sustenance in their jagir despite being Hindus, then what is the use of religion for them? Man's religion cannot stand before hunger. Therefore, for their survival and survival they had to take refuge in Islam. If someone gave up his property in anger to protect his religion, then where would he stay? A small mistake could have displaced them. There was no one to support such people in that era. There was neither fanaticism nor religious fanaticism among the Rajputs and Muslims of that time. They did not know communalism yet. Muslims were created from among them, they had blood relations with each other some time ago, then why should they feel embarrassed? The elders had not yet forgotten their mutual marriages a few years ago. They lived together, worked together in the fields, and grazed animals together. Religion did not make them untouchable for each other. Therefore, the Kelans and other Rajputs of the western border were not ready to give up their land, property, homes, neighbors and relationships for the protection or promotion of religion. Muslims were not their enemies but their relatives of yesterday, hence most of the Kelan Bhatis and other Rajputs joined them and gradually they merged with the Muslims.
In my opinion, such sentiments started coming from the time of Rao Shekha, or before him, from the time of Rao Barsal. The marriages of Rao Kelan and Chachagdev with Muslim princesses also had no less contribution in this. If the rulers loved the Muslims and did not hate them, then what objection could the subjects have in following them? His being sensitive and tolerant towards Muslims, Hindus playing in the same courtyard, children of Muslim queens, relatives coming to meet, etc. were such points due to which religious fanaticism was washed away. It had lost its sharpness. Bhatis and Muslims still have the same relations in the Pugal area, while fanatics are digging a gap of discrimination between them. Even after this, their mutual feelings and emotions remain the same as generations ago. There are about eighty percent Muslims in this area, but for the Bhatis, they are still the same people as they were four to five hundred years ago. Bhati's pain is his own pain, he openly accepts it.
Reference pugal ka ithihaas page number 339