@@saianshbaby8380 Hayden might have been better idk it’s hard to say as Smith used to play on South African pitches which is arguably the hardest to bat on and I needed an accomplished captain as I put Dravid at 3 cause I feel there should always be someone in a side who can absorb the pressure and hold one end and who can do that better than Dravid.
Opening is a highly overanalysed position in test cricket..i have Kallis and Sanga as openers for the very reason that they most often than not come to bat very early at no 3 when openers get out....they play the new ball often...plus they are tuned for both Asia and overseas conditions
@@rishabt1401 u need 5 bowlers wherever u play.....test cricket revolves around picking 20 wickets...that's the only way to win....plus Kallis is the 4 th seamer option....u have to be ruthless with bowling attack with 6 top frontline batsmen....Gilly was not as good in test cricket as it is made out to be...he was blessed to be in a champion team. .
Hussain's opening bowler making a mickey out of his own opening batsman at 33:14 ! The most absurd choice out of all those 22 players is Marcus Trescothick. That too ahead of people like Langer, Dravid, Saeed Anwar etc.
As an Aussie I agree with Rob here. Sad to see Lyon in this side. What about Regana Herath? Over 400 wickets in your era, considering 4 or so years he was behind Murali, pretty impressive!
There are few names that do not come out as often as they should. According to Me Rengana Herath is one and the other one people often miss who is often eclipsed for obvious reasons is Anil Kumble.
Best test 11 of last 30 years - Matthew Hayden Rahul Dravid Ponting ( C ) Tendulkar Brian lara Sangakkara ( wk ) Kallis Wasim Akram Muralitharan Warne McGrath
One thing impressed me with these both team picks they went with statices and their average including records. This was extremely nice to see it and also knowing the records of all these greats players were fantastic Thanks you very much for this 💯👊
Naseer's World XI----- Mathew Hayden Marcus Trescothick Ricky Ponting (C) Sachin Tendulkar Brian Lara Jacques Kallis Adam Gilchrist (W) Wasim Akram Shane warne Muttiah Muralitharan Glenn McGrath Rob Key's World XI----- Virender Shewag Graeme Smith (C) kumar Sangakara Virat Kholi Steve Smith Ben Stokes AB de Villiers (W) Pat Cummins Dale Steyn James Anderson Jasprit Bumrah replaced with Nathan Lyon ( spinner ) since he needed a spinner in his squad
My all time best Test XI Alaistair Cook Graeme Smith Ricky Ponting ( C ) Sachin Tendulkar AB de Villiers Jacques Kallis Adam Gilchrist ( wk ) Wasim Akram Shane Warne Dale Steyn Glenn McGrath
I think Hussain could have finished his job by saying a single line,' my team is d Australian team that played under Waugh'. Hayden langer Ponting M Waugh Martyn S Waugh Gilchrist Warne lee McGrath Gillespie
@@rorschach1724 He had to choose players from other countries to make it look like a world XI but im sure that Aussie side of late 90s and early 2000s could have beaten any World XI.
@@sanyamtomar8496 Any 2 among Martyn, Symonds and M Hussey. He could not have picked Starc though bcz Starc is not from dat era but Rob Key could have picked him in place of Cummins.
Judging by the players I have seen my ODI team will look like this - 1. Sangakkara 2. Sachin tendulkar 3. Virat Kohli 4. Ricky Ponting 5. Jack kallis 6. Ben Stokes 7. MS dhoni (wk cap) 8. Wasim Akram 9. Shane Warne 10. Mcgrath 11. Muralitharan
@@12cricketmad Seriously ? Slater in a World XI ? You have got to be kidding me. Langer deserved to be there but I guess Nasser had already picked 5 Aussies in his team so he couldn't select him. Saeed Anwar from Pakistan could have been a good choice although he played only 50 odd Test matches but still he was a very good batsman.
Glad to hear and see Rob is doing fine after his scare. Was almost touched by Nasser's mention of the health scare and then was brought back to earth with the resumption of the ribbing.
My pick: Nathan Astle Graeme Smith Kallis Tendulkar Fap duplessis Mike Hussey Kumar Sangakkara Shane Warne Steve Harmison Chaminda Vaas Zaheer khan (too dangerous once he gets the reverse swing going)
Old era Sachin Heyden Pointing(C) Dravid Lara Kali's Gilchrist(Wk) Wasim Akram Shane warne Murali McGrath New era Grame smith(C) Virendar sehwag Sangakara(Wk) Virat kohli Steve Smith Ab devilliars Ben stokes Ashwin Pat Cummins Dale stayn James Anderson
Modern Era Sehwag Cook Sangakkara Kohli Smith Stokes AB Pat Dale Starc Lyon Previous Era Hayden Jayasurya Ponting Sachin Lara Kallis Gilchrist Akram Ambrose Warne Mcgrath
Not if anyone asked, but here's My Test XI Graeme Smith Matthew Hayden Kumar Sangakkara (WK) Jacques Kallis Michael Hussey Ricky Ponting (C) Shaun Pollock Wasim Akram Shane Warne Glenn McGrath Muttiah Muralitharan
@@invincibleanon3712 Yeah he needs time to settle in T20s but is far more consistent than AB in T20is. Ab just has an average of 26 in T20 internationals as compared to Kohli's average of 50. Moreover, Kohli has 2 man of the tournament awards in World T20s and also an orange cap in IPL.
Except when thr bowlers are from the previous era. Look at how he struggled against Shaun Tait, Asif, Akhtar. If he could have faced lee, mcgrath, etc then surely he would have become more great with his experience
My All-time Test XI 1. Jack Hobbs 2. Leonard Hutton 3. Donald Bradman (captain) 4. Brian Lara 5. David Gower 6. Garfield Sobers 7. Alan Knott (wk) 8. Shane Warne 9. Harold Larwood 10. Hedley Verity 11. Fred Trueman 12th man. Sydney Barnes Subs 13. Patsy Hendren 14. Wally Hammond 15. Eddie Paynter
My woooooooord.. this is absolute paradise for any CRICKET TRAGIC...&that's two teams of absolute Titans of the BEAUTIFUL inspiring Game...&I just feel..DALE 🐐 SHOULD HAVE BEEN IN BOTH THE SIDES
People knocking Trescothick don't know what they're talking about... the guy was different gravy with the bat. * Fastest player ever (time taken) to 5000 test runs * Averaged 44 in Tests * 14 Test hundreds (Root only has 20 currently with 50 more innings played) * Scored 1000+ runs 3 calendar years in a row (03-05) for England before his mental health issues * 26000+ runs in domestic cricket - absolutely terrorised bowlers for Somerset And just LOOK at the bowlers he had to do it against when playing for England.... His record speaks for itself. Without the mental health issues he'd probably be England's all time top run scorer and would have kept Cook out of the team. Very under-rated player.
Don’t need 2 spinners @ Lords. Nas should let go Murali and add Waqar or Ambrose. Also as someone suggested, Ponting, Sachin and Lara between them have zero hundreds at Lords!
@Angus Hile Yeah I watched the Test documentary and he's a cool guy and great player. Should've won the ashes with that Ben Stokes lbw. But Warne and Murali no contest unfortunately.
Yep agreed, Ashwin should get in over Lyon - doesn't matter about mankads, and also if you are going to have three quicks and one spinner in a team competing against Warne and Murili I'd put Jadeja in as the allrounder ahead of Stokes. India has been arguably the most successful Test team over the era, so it stands to reason there should be more than two Indians in the team.
I don't agree with trescothik's selection in nasser's side, rest is iconic and legendary. He could have picked Jayasuriya and I wouldn't complain but trescothik....really!!! Hayden Dravid Ponting Sachin Lara Kallis Gilchrist Warne Akram McGrath Murali
Teams of blockers 1) gawaskar 2) cook 3) boycott 4) dravid 5) pujara 6) Chanderpaul 7) Watling 8) vettori 9) Wagner 10) Giles 11) Walsh Here bowlers are also not attacking but defensive (bowls line and length waits batsman to make mistake) along with super defensive batsman
I did this with my dad, he did Nasser’s era and I picked the modern era Nasser’s era. Modern Era 1. Mathew Hayden. 1. Alistair Cook 2. Rahul Dravid. 2. Kumar Sangakkara 3. Ricky Ponting. 3. Virat Kohli 4. Sachin Tendulkar. 4. Steve Smith 5. Brian Lara. 5. Kane Williamson 6. Jacques Kallis. 6. Ben Stokes 7. Adam Gilchrist. 7. AB de Villiers 8. Shane Warne. 8. Pat Cummins 9. Muttiah Muralitheran. 9. Dale Steyn 10. Glenn McGrath. 10. Nathan Lyon 11. Brett Lee. 11. James Anderson
@@sanyamtomar8496 a bowler with an average of 30 is not considered world class. You can try any one of Akram, Waqar, Donald, even Bond, who all averaged considerably under 30 in Tests. Lee was better in ODIs but was average in Tests.
@@sanyamtomar8496 I compared his stats with 90s bowlers because he was picked in the 90s team 😄. His average in England or in Asia was shite. Frankly speaking, if Lee wasnt backed up by Warne and McGrath, his average would be higher than even 30. He shouldn't even be in an Australian all time 11, never mind World 11
Nasser's bowling attack is the difference between the 2 sides. Even though I think he's actually missed out the single best bowler of that era in Curtly Ambrose.
@@corpgov Ambrose is just a better version of McGrath. McGrath got flustered when batsmen went after him. Sachin took him apart many times but it's very difficult to find instances of Ambrose being taken apart like that.
Here's my team from 1990 - 2004 1 Gary Kirsten SA 2 Justin Langer AUS 3 Rahul Dravid IND 4 Mohammad Yousuf PAK 5 Steve Waugh (c) 6 Andy Flower (Wk Bats) ZIM 7 Andrew Flintoff ENG 8 Shaun Pollock SA 9 Anil Kumble IND 10 Waqar Younis PAK 11 Coutney Walsh WI 12 Daniel Vettori NZ 13 Curtly Ambrose WI 14 Stephen Fleming NZ 15 Chaminda Vaas SI 16 Mark Waugh AUS
No way Rob’s team is going to win any test match against Nas’s team, on any condition, on any pitch and whatever the outcome of the toss! I’m not talking stats here. Just the skill levels and mental makeup of Nas’s team is overwhelming to say the least!
Now, what about a triangular series and the team from 1975 - 1990 Sunil Gavaskar Gordon Greenidge Viv Richards Zaheer Abbas David Gower Ian Healy(wk) Kapil Dev Imran Khan (c) Richard Hadlee Abdul Qadir Malcolm Marshall
@@jairajsinghshaktawat6593 Well it depends on conditions and what you are looking for in a team. Dhoni as captain and keeper was exceptional... Harbhajan in second innings in Asia was unplayable .. so context I suppose... All great players ...
@@_psychopath_5623 Why don't you? I have and he said he's the only bowler he faced that he was scared ... yes he had success as well because he's a class act against pace but Akhter on his day was as good as any and the fastest ever...
I would pick Warne in place of Steyn as you already have two top notch pacers in Akram and Mcgrath to add to that Kallis can chip in with his guile of medium pace. I will go with 3 quicks and 2 spinners. But my keeper would be Sangakkara who could play long inngs compared to Gilly who was more of a dasher at times could cost his wicket
My thoughts on one of the discussions......I would say 90s to early 2000 was the best era for cricket .....you had great batmen......best spinners of all time....fastest bowlers.......best swing and seam bowlers.....balls that remain hard for 80 overs....more reverse swing...as you could get away with some ball tempering ....video analysis of batsman weakness.... drastic change in fielding standards....Viv and Gavaskar era comes the closest....yes don bradman was 20 years ahead of his time....as most great batsmen are....but if you watch videos of that time it really feels a lot easier than the modern era....at that time some people have played fc cricket till their late 40s....also less number of countries playing competitive cricket (only England)....history suggests that one player may do extremely well against one country....it is like Ian bell has average of 488 against bangladesh :)........yes Don has done well against other countries but they lack the structure and quality....also their were lack of variety in pitches..like Ponting not able to perform in Indian condition...or Aussie and English batmen faltering in SL ........still if one wants to look at only average...then Don Bradman is GOAT....but cricket is lot more than a number....like why there are selectors to select team...computer can do the same based on player averages.... ...not talking about the current era...let it pan out....:)....I would urge u to watch mid wicket tales...on prime....there are some footage of that era...u see bowling of Vinoo Mankad...considered as one of the best in India...also there are many tales of how unworthy influential players were selected to play.....so my best bet Ponting...Sachin and Lara....Sorry Viv and Gavaskar..:)
Don Bradman also scored all those runs on uncovered pitches. Think about that for a while, a ball jagging left and right, up and down, two paced and averaged 99.
If Bradman's era was easier, then there would have been many other batsmen averaging 90+ in Test & FC cricket but there were none. ZERO. When one man is so much better than anyone else, in his era or any other era, you have to accept that he was a one & only. That's what makes him stand out above all whereas plenty of there are a ton of players who averaged in the 50's in all eras. Furthermore, Bradman played in era of uncovered pitches, so if it rained last night, you were playing on a mushy pitch, if you think that's easier than modern eras then you need to revisit your assumptions.
He was the greatest player of that era and even 20 30 years ahead of his era...however cricket has become more and more modern..when slight anamoly in one's technique is analysed so much by everyone.. .even ur strength may become ur weakness...look at him bat in old footages...he does not compare to modern era batsman.....we tend to value old things more and exaggerate even more when there are very less recordings......comparing eras I feel 90s were the best as explained above..
also I found 4 players having average of around 60 of that era. there may be more.. they were playing on those uncovered pitches.... as per your logic they would be better than everyone else of this era....
Great team, i have choosen 9 out of 11 players just replace sehwag with dravid and flintoff with brian lara. You have 5 bowlers with kallis as all rounder and sehwag and sachin can bowl. Viv richards is aggressive batsmn and dravid is his calming opponent i doubt any team can beat this dream 11.
@@vatsalsingh1555 Sir I can agree on Dravid for Sehwag. But Flintoff was more of a Fast bowler...in fact Ponting once said Flintoff was one of the best fast bowler he has ever faced...So i chose Fredie as an extra Pace option because the batting depth is more than enough in this team...and Kallis was not that quick to be considered as a genuine pacer.
My team Old era : Hayden Sehwag Lara Sachin Ponting (C) Kallis Gilchrist McGrath Wasim Waqar Warne -------------------- New Era: Cook Warner Smith Kohli Williamson ABD Stokes Steyn Anderson Ashwin Lyon ------- PS: Test matches aint like before. The oldies ll wipe the floor with new buds.
Per decade teams (players played most in that decade, or played the whole decade) 2010s Warner Cook Kohli Smith ABDV Stokes Steyn Lyon Bumrah Anderson 2000s Sehwag Hayden Dravid Ponting Sachin Kallis Gilchrist Warne Brett Lee Murali McGrath 1990s Saeed Anwar Gary Kirsten Lara Sachin Inzamam Alec Stewart Wasim Kumble Saqlain Waqar Ambrose Earlier Gavaskar Haynes Sir Viv Clive Lloyd Gary sobers Kapil Dev Imran Khan Malcom Marshall Dennis lilee Joel garner Michael holding
Excellent effort... 👍👍👍👍 Its almost faultless and accurate as per my choice too.. Only two changes I would like to add- 2000s team : I think warne was not in his prime form, so I would like to take Shaun Pollock instead. 1990s team: I think warne was much much more penetrating than Kumble. And Murli was evolving. So I would take Warne as an automatic choice as the only spinner in 90s and Kumble has to sacrifice. These type of arguements are always healthy abd refreshing!!
So Rob refuses to pick Ashwin because he "Mankaded" someone, but picked Steve Smith even after ball tampering? Mankading is legal, ball tampering aint. And Lyon is nowhere near Ashwin, plus Ashwin is proper allrounder. Root or Williamson- either could have replaced Smith. Funny morality.
Ricky Ponting is a great commentator now when he is working for sky during the English summer. I can listen to Ponting & sankagarra talk cricket for hours.
ALL time TEST XI (without any debate) 1. Sir Alastair Cook 2. Sir Donald Bradman 3. Brian Lara 4. Sachin Tendulkar 5. Jacques Kallis 6. Kumar Sangakkara (wk) 7. Sir Garfield Sobers 8. Shane Warne 9. Wasim Akram 10. Malcolm Marshall 11. Glenn Mcgrath Bench 12. M Muralidaran 13. Dale Steyn 14. Sir Curtly Ambrose 15. Rahul Dravid
Sorry but Virat Kohli is nowhere near Sachin Tendulkar whether its Tests or ODIs. The rules in Virat's time favor batting now. And the bowlers even was superior in Sachin's time.
3rd teams of blockers 1) gawaskar 2) cook 3) Younis Khan 4) dravid 5) pujara 6) Chanderpaul 7) bj Watling 8) vettori 9) Zaheer Khan 10) kumble 11) Walsh Here bowlers are also not attacking but defensive (bowls line and length waits batsman to make mistake) along with super defensive batsman
@@PradeepKumar-dg8ri He's decent but skill wise not in the same league as the other two I've mentioned... Even his stats are inferior to both Herath and Ajmal..
Only skill will not win u a match mr/ms do u know the word consistency....test cricket is all about how consistent the bowlers are...Lyon is that kind of bowler....decent action and when it comes to ajmal...his action is not that proper....rangana herath's record in away matches is not that considerable....dont underrate Lyon he is also a match winner in his own way...
Good decision by roobie in the end In place of Bumrah by putting lyon's name ..he is just fantastic bowler no doosra simple offspin...it is great lesson for youngsters that by simple off spin you can get heap of wickets..
Steve smith if he keeps his average around 60 by the time of his retirement will come close but yeah as an Australian Sachin Tendulkar and Don Bradman are by far the GOAT test batters...
@@Roooop_1910 lol. Sachin has been the highest scorer in multiple WCs. Played against better bowlers in tougher conditions. Even in white ball cricket Kohli is no match for Sachin.
Money ball team 1. K sangakara 2. Lara 3. Ponting 4. Smith 5. Tendulkar 6. J kallis 7. B stokes 8. Ashwin 9. Akram 10. Warne 11. Ambrose Specialist fielders Specialist bowlers Specialist batsmen Win or draw team . Second innings can be aggressive batsmen first if need be and batting line up can change according to certain pitchs. 1. Ponting .2 lara. 3. stokes 4. Akram 5.warne faster runs 6. S Smith 7. Tendulkar 8. Kallis 9 sangakara 10. Ashwin 11. Ambrose
Nasser's team wins again -- the side with the superior bowling attack almost always does. They'd still lose to the 1984 Windies team tho. In my mind, the best team in the history of team sports.
The difference in quality between the two eras is staggering. Nasser's B team (Dravid, Ambrose, Donald, Steve Waugh, Waqar, etc.) would destroy Rob's A team 😂
Why do these player forget about the legend of Andy Flower??? Even with all Gilly has done, there is no other cricketer in test history to average more than Andy as Wicket Keeper, he averages 50+ ...!!!
My XI's Nasser's Era Matthew Hayden Sanath Jayasuriya Brian Lara Sachin Tendulkar Steve Waugh (c) Jacques Kallis Adam Gilchrist (wk) Wasim Akram (2) Shane Warne Curtly Ambrose Glenn McGrath (1) 12th Muttiah Muralitharan
![Twenty One Pilots - The Line (from Arcane Season 2) [Official Audio]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/XCz7WUotXs8/mqdefault.jpg)
Didn't know Chandler from Friends is such a big cricket fan
😂😂😂 didn't know he had such a good British Accent
Oh my god, could he look any less like Chandler.
Who timestamp???
@@enricopucci822 lol. The anchor looks like chandler.
Yeah and Jake from Two and a Half Men is all grown up and chatting with Nasser Hussain!!!
Best 11 of last 30 years
1) Sehwag
2) Hayden
3) Ponting (C)
4) Sachin
5) Lara
6) Kallis
7) Gilchrist(Wk)
8) Warne
9) Murali
10) Akram
11) McGrath
Mine is almost the same
1)Sehwag
2) G Smith (C)
3) Dravid
4) Sachin
5) Lara
6) Kallis
7) Gilchrist (Wk)
8) Warne
9) Ambrose
10)McGrath
11) Murali
@@siddharth1200 good team. But I feel Hayden was a bit better than Graeme and Cook.
@@saianshbaby8380 Hayden might have been better idk it’s hard to say as Smith used to play on South African pitches which is arguably the hardest to bat on and I needed an accomplished captain as I put Dravid at 3 cause I feel there should always be someone in a side who can absorb the pressure and hold one end and who can do that better than Dravid.
@@siddharth1200 fair enough. I put Ponting in place of Dravid who could take care of both.
@@saianshbaby8380 when you get to the top 33 in the last 30 years apart from Sachin, Lara, Warne, McGrath you’re splitting hairs over who was better.
Great to see Rob Key back and looking well.
What had happened to him?
chirag sharma He had a mini stroke
chirag sharma watch the first 3 minutes
This has cheered me up no end. Keyseys Murali story and calling him a boggle eyed freak had me in stitches. 🤣
Keys is a joker, these 2 bounce off each other brilliantly
38:48
Murali literally has better stats than Warne in every format. No idea why Nasser would go with Warne
@@drabnail777One played in a place where the ball doesn't usually spin, one played in a place where the ball does spin
49:57. Thank me later
Thanks
Not all heroes wear capes
It was a brilliant conversation
thank u later
Thanks buddy
My best test 11 from last 20 years:
Sanga (wk)
Kallis
Rahul
Sachin
Lara(vc)
Ponting (c)
Wasim
Warne
Steyn
Mcgrath
Murali
Got all bases covered...
No openers
Opening is a highly overanalysed position in test cricket..i have Kallis and Sanga as openers for the very reason that they most often than not come to bat very early at no 3 when openers get out....they play the new ball often...plus they are tuned for both Asia and overseas conditions
@@rishabt1401 u need 5 bowlers wherever u play.....test cricket revolves around picking 20 wickets...that's the only way to win....plus Kallis is the 4 th seamer option....u have to be ruthless with bowling attack with 6 top frontline batsmen....Gilly was not as good in test cricket as it is made out to be...he was blessed to be in a champion team. .
Wat abt hashiim amla nd Ab devilliers.
Hussain's opening bowler making a mickey out of his own opening batsman at 33:14 !
The most absurd choice out of all those 22 players is Marcus Trescothick. That too ahead of people like Langer, Dravid, Saeed Anwar etc.
He was trying to be different I reckon but who knows buddy’s bald 👨🦲
Totally agree
Yeah
Trescothick was better than Anwar and Dravid wasn't an opener
@@JY-ev5ms saed anwar has better average than trescothick than in test and ODI.
What is your point?
As an Aussie I agree with Rob here. Sad to see Lyon in this side. What about Regana Herath? Over 400 wickets in your era, considering 4 or so years he was behind Murali, pretty impressive!
There are few names that do not come out as often as they should. According to Me Rengana Herath is one and the other one people often miss who is often eclipsed for obvious reasons is Anil Kumble.
From the players I've seen this would be mine.. Sehwag Amla Smith Kohli Abd Stokes Jadeja Ashwin Steyn Cummins Bumrah
And Ashwin too
Hut herath got wickets mostly in Asia right
1. S Gavaskar, 2. Shewag, 3. Bradman(VC), 4. Tendulkar, 5. Kallis, 6. Sangakara(C)(WK), 7. Sobers, 8. Dev, 9. Akram, 10. Warne, 11. Ambrose. 12. Murlitharan(in Asia in place of Dev).
Makes you appreciate just how all-time that Australian squad of the early/mid 2000s really was. Hayden, Ponting, Gilly, Warne, Mcgrath and so on!
By the same token: Smith, Kallis, AB, Steyn, etc
Nass picks Wasim Akram and Sky shows a clip of wasim cleaning up his opener Tres lol
He wasn't tres think he was a nightwatchman
@@jamiltanoli7856 the commentator literally said that Trescothick has had his stumps rolled over
@@kierankumar5801 yeah I think i wasn't sure then
@@jamiltanoli7856 are you blind 😂
1. S Gavaskar, 2. Shewag, 3. Bradman(VC), 4. Tendulkar, 5. Kallis, 6. Sangakara(C)(WK), 7. Sobers, 8. Dev, 9. Akram, 10. Warne, 11. Ambrose. 12. Murlitharan(in Asia in place of Dev).
Best test 11 of last 30 years -
Matthew Hayden
Rahul Dravid
Ponting ( C )
Tendulkar
Brian lara
Sangakkara ( wk )
Kallis
Wasim Akram
Muralitharan
Warne
McGrath
Steyn is the only missing here
Choice of Dravid is so good but in a big fan of sehwag also with Dravid....
@@junzzz963 Sehwag is not technically strong batsman as compared to Hayden
Viv Richards should be there instead of Hayden
@@tariniacharya4440 This is last 30 years best test 11 and Viv Richards get retired before 1990s
People forget Ponting was averaging 60+ after 100 tests!
@Raas Putin who apart from Bradman is averaging 60+ in test 😐
Raas Putin yes he will
And Tendulkar averaged above 50 after 200 tests😂
Ponting was a freak near that 100 test mark!
But scoring all around world matters, ponting toured India four times and just got one ton that too when kumble, their main bowler, was not playing.
0:17 That comeon! Call for all out attack!! Goosebumps !!!!
Cringe.
i just love these guys chatting so genuinely about cricket like boys. Just makes me feel at ease.
I think dale steyn is one of the if not the only bowler who can complete with old greates of fast bowling.
One thing impressed me with these both team picks they went with statices and their average including records. This was extremely nice to see it and also knowing the records of all these greats players were fantastic Thanks you very much for this 💯👊
Ponting, Lara and Tendulkar have one last chance to get a test hundred at Lord's.
Fellow 442oons fan i see
@@chathurapremasinghe1939 howdy fellow 442oons fans
@@edward4828 u 2?
Lord's has one last chance to witness a 100 from them
@ШИРИШ in this game
Naseer's World XI-----
Mathew Hayden
Marcus Trescothick
Ricky Ponting (C)
Sachin Tendulkar
Brian Lara
Jacques Kallis
Adam Gilchrist (W)
Wasim Akram
Shane warne
Muttiah Muralitharan
Glenn McGrath
Rob Key's World XI-----
Virender Shewag
Graeme Smith (C)
kumar Sangakara
Virat Kholi
Steve Smith
Ben Stokes
AB de Villiers (W)
Pat Cummins
Dale Steyn
James Anderson
Jasprit Bumrah replaced with Nathan Lyon ( spinner ) since he needed a spinner in his squad
23:54 wow everyone knew he was talking about Kallis , seriously underrated player of is era.
My all time best Test XI Alaistair Cook Graeme Smith Ricky Ponting ( C ) Sachin Tendulkar AB de Villiers Jacques Kallis Adam Gilchrist ( wk ) Wasim Akram Shane Warne Dale Steyn Glenn McGrath
Good to see you back and looking healthy, Rob.
I think Hussain could have finished his job by saying a single line,' my team is d Australian team that played under Waugh'.
Hayden
langer
Ponting
M Waugh
Martyn
S Waugh
Gilchrist
Warne
lee
McGrath
Gillespie
I think he picked the team under ponting. Look there is no Steve Waugh himself in the team😀
@@rorschach1724 He had to choose players from other countries to make it look like a world XI but im sure that Aussie side of late 90s and early 2000s could have beaten any World XI.
@@sanyamtomar8496 Any 2 among Martyn, Symonds and M Hussey. He could not have picked Starc though bcz Starc is not from dat era but Rob Key could have picked him in place of Cummins.
@@sanyamtomar8496 surely bro..
They were good , weren't they ? But Naser's world 11 would thrash any team in any era in my humble opinion. Tendulkar and Lara together , my oh my .
"Refuse to have some one in side who does Mankads" LOL. Batsman and their Entitlements.
Underrated comment mate😂
@@Sir_Panda007Yeah Indian now get lost.
49:57 for the lineups
Judging by the players I have seen my ODI team will look like this -
1. Sangakkara
2. Sachin tendulkar
3. Virat Kohli
4. Ricky Ponting
5. Jack kallis
6. Ben Stokes
7. MS dhoni (wk cap)
8. Wasim Akram
9. Shane Warne
10. Mcgrath
11. Muralitharan
Naser's lineup would shatter any team in any era. Tendulkar, Lara together. My oh my .
The biggest reason sachin is the greatest at age of 25 he was in bradman's all time 11
Bradman was fraud himself
@@adesh4448 Cry cry cry
@@damonaspeling9734 no, Bradman on sticky pitches was so so bad, on an absolute road no one was able to pick up his wicket.
really SACHIN dominated bowlers everywhere on every pitch, no other test player has done that. That makes Sachin the greatest.
Trescothick has just won the lottery being selected in that team
Langer or Slater surely?
@@12cricketmad Seriously ? Slater in a World XI ? You have got to be kidding me.
Langer deserved to be there but I guess Nasser had already picked 5 Aussies in his team so he couldn't select him.
Saeed Anwar from Pakistan could have been a good choice although he played only 50 odd Test matches but still he was a very good batsman.
Trescothick is one the most highly rated english batsmen of the last 30 years
Can't pick Gary Kirsten? amazingly difficult guy to dislodge and excellent record against pace and spin
Could hav picked jayasuriya and he bowls 2
Glad to hear and see Rob is doing fine after his scare. Was almost touched by Nasser's mention of the health scare and then was brought back to earth with the resumption of the ribbing.
41:16 key for no reason rips on Strauss, love it 😂
Keys - you should have picked Herath as your spinner. 433 wickets at 28 runs a piece.
My pick:
Nathan Astle
Graeme Smith
Kallis
Tendulkar
Fap duplessis
Mike Hussey
Kumar Sangakkara
Shane Warne
Steve Harmison
Chaminda Vaas
Zaheer khan (too dangerous once he gets the reverse swing going)
Nasser reading Key's publicist's blurb is just brilliant
Old era
Sachin
Heyden
Pointing(C)
Dravid
Lara
Kali's
Gilchrist(Wk)
Wasim Akram
Shane warne
Murali
McGrath
New era
Grame smith(C)
Virendar sehwag
Sangakara(Wk)
Virat kohli
Steve Smith
Ab devilliars
Ben stokes
Ashwin
Pat Cummins
Dale stayn
James Anderson
Happiest guy in the world right now is Marcus Trescothik 😂
😂😂
Ha Ha Ha
That means you didn’t watch his cricket. He was an amazing player. Only if he had a longer career he would have been amazing
1. S Gavaskar, 2. Shewag, 3. Bradman(VC), 4. Tendulkar, 5. Kallis, 6. Sangakara(C)(WK), 7. Sobers, 8. Dev, 9. Akram, 10. Warne, 11. Ambrose. 12. Murlitharan(in Asia in place of Dev).
Modern Era
Sehwag
Cook
Sangakkara
Kohli
Smith
Stokes
AB
Pat
Dale
Starc
Lyon
Previous Era
Hayden
Jayasurya
Ponting
Sachin
Lara
Kallis
Gilchrist
Akram
Ambrose
Warne
Mcgrath
The strangest thing is rob key didn't picked ashwin bc of mankad but still picked steve smith 😳😬
@Hmm Hmmm maybe
@Hmm Hmmm that's true, he is what he's. But is damn funny.
@Hmm Hmmm Is that why he is adoring Bumrah, Kohli and Sehwag?
Not if anyone asked, but here's My Test XI
Graeme Smith
Matthew Hayden
Kumar Sangakkara (WK)
Jacques Kallis
Michael Hussey
Ricky Ponting (C)
Shaun Pollock
Wasim Akram
Shane Warne
Glenn McGrath
Muttiah Muralitharan
AB at 6 and Stokes at 7 for Key's XI. AB could probably outbat anybody in that team.
Was gonna say, outrageous for stokes to be above AB
@@invincibleanon3712 Yeah he needs time to settle in T20s but is far more consistent than AB in T20is. Ab just has an average of 26 in T20 internationals as compared to Kohli's average of 50. Moreover, Kohli has 2 man of the tournament awards in World T20s and also an orange cap in IPL.
ABD bats at 7 because he keeps wickets, he needs to give his back rest as much as possible .
Seems like you don't know much about test cricket.
Except when thr bowlers are from the previous era. Look at how he struggled against Shaun Tait, Asif, Akhtar.
If he could have faced lee, mcgrath, etc then surely he would have become more great with his experience
My All-time Test XI
1. Jack Hobbs
2. Leonard Hutton
3. Donald Bradman (captain)
4. Brian Lara
5. David Gower
6. Garfield Sobers
7. Alan Knott (wk)
8. Shane Warne
9. Harold Larwood
10. Hedley Verity
11. Fred Trueman
12th man. Sydney Barnes
Subs
13. Patsy Hendren
14. Wally Hammond
15. Eddie Paynter
I'll take a wild guess here. I'm guessing ur from England
My woooooooord.. this is absolute paradise for any CRICKET TRAGIC...&that's two teams of absolute Titans of the BEAUTIFUL inspiring Game...&I just feel..DALE 🐐 SHOULD HAVE BEEN IN BOTH THE SIDES
People knocking Trescothick don't know what they're talking about... the guy was different gravy with the bat.
* Fastest player ever (time taken) to 5000 test runs
* Averaged 44 in Tests
* 14 Test hundreds (Root only has 20 currently with 50 more innings played)
* Scored 1000+ runs 3 calendar years in a row (03-05) for England before his mental health issues
* 26000+ runs in domestic cricket - absolutely terrorised bowlers for Somerset
And just LOOK at the bowlers he had to do it against when playing for England....
His record speaks for itself. Without the mental health issues he'd probably be England's all time top run scorer and would have kept Cook out of the team. Very under-rated player.
Hashim amla one of the best opener in the modern era
Amla batter at 3
@@jacquescoetzee3327 No chance
Robs era 1. Sehwag 2. Smith 3. Sangakkara 4. Kohli 5. Ab Devilles 6. Root 7. Stokes 8. Swann 9. Cummings 10. Stayn 11. Anderson
Don’t need 2 spinners @ Lords. Nas should let go Murali and add Waqar or Ambrose. Also as someone suggested, Ponting, Sachin and Lara between them have zero hundreds at Lords!
It was all going well till Keys brought Nathan Lyon to best Murali and Warne😂😂
Until he tried to put Smudge as his spinner 😂
@Angus Hile Yeah I watched the Test documentary and he's a cool guy and great player. Should've won the ashes with that Ben Stokes lbw. But Warne and Murali no contest unfortunately.
@Angus Hile The way he's going he might not even get 400 lol
Yep agreed, Ashwin should get in over Lyon - doesn't matter about mankads, and also if you are going to have three quicks and one spinner in a team competing against Warne and Murili I'd put Jadeja in as the allrounder ahead of Stokes. India has been arguably the most successful Test team over the era, so it stands to reason there should be more than two Indians in the team.
1. S Gavaskar, 2. Shewag, 3. Bradman(VC), 4. Tendulkar, 5. Kallis, 6. Sangakara(C)(WK), 7. Sobers, 8. Dev, 9. Akram, 10. Warne, 11. Ambrose. 12. Murlitharan(in Asia in place of Dev).
Lyon and Ashwin were not your only option, you forgot Harbhajan Singh and Daniel Vettori.
Herath!
Yeah he missed a trick not having Vettori, good bat too.
Kumble is the best pick.
@@AR-qt8fs Kumble didn't fall into that era, and he was shocking anyway
@lee turton vettori is a bigger dickhead than Swann. Swann is a nice funny bloke
I don't agree with trescothik's selection in nasser's side, rest is iconic and legendary. He could have picked Jayasuriya and I wouldn't complain but trescothik....really!!!
Hayden
Dravid
Ponting
Sachin
Lara
Kallis
Gilchrist
Warne
Akram
McGrath
Murali
IN TEST 11 THE 3 batsman at 3 4 5 positions with any of these 3 at any of the 3 positions are
RAHUL DRAVID
VIRAT KOHLI
STEVE SMITH
Teams of blockers
1) gawaskar
2) cook
3) boycott
4) dravid
5) pujara
6) Chanderpaul
7) Watling
8) vettori
9) Wagner
10) Giles
11) Walsh
Here bowlers are also not attacking but defensive (bowls line and length waits batsman to make mistake) along with super defensive batsman
I did this with my dad, he did Nasser’s era and I picked the modern era
Nasser’s era. Modern Era
1. Mathew Hayden. 1. Alistair Cook
2. Rahul Dravid. 2. Kumar Sangakkara
3. Ricky Ponting. 3. Virat Kohli
4. Sachin Tendulkar. 4. Steve Smith
5. Brian Lara. 5. Kane Williamson
6. Jacques Kallis. 6. Ben Stokes
7. Adam Gilchrist. 7. AB de Villiers
8. Shane Warne. 8. Pat Cummins
9. Muttiah Muralitheran. 9. Dale Steyn
10. Glenn McGrath. 10. Nathan Lyon
11. Brett Lee. 11. James Anderson
nice selection man
Brett Lee in tests was average, mate. Your dad needs to try again
Dravid was not opener, take Sehwag
@@sanyamtomar8496 a bowler with an average of 30 is not considered world class. You can try any one of Akram, Waqar, Donald, even Bond, who all averaged considerably under 30 in Tests. Lee was better in ODIs but was average in Tests.
@@sanyamtomar8496 I compared his stats with 90s bowlers because he was picked in the 90s team 😄. His average in England or in Asia was shite. Frankly speaking, if Lee wasnt backed up by Warne and McGrath, his average would be higher than even 30. He shouldn't even be in an Australian all time 11, never mind World 11
Nass’s era is so nostalgic
Nasser's bowling attack is the difference between the 2 sides. Even though I think he's actually missed out the single best bowler of that era in Curtly Ambrose.
pace and bounce, but little variation
@@corpgov Ambrose is just a better version of McGrath. McGrath got flustered when batsmen went after him. Sachin took him apart many times but it's very difficult to find instances of Ambrose being taken apart like that.
Here's my team from 1990 - 2004
1 Gary Kirsten SA
2 Justin Langer AUS
3 Rahul Dravid IND
4 Mohammad Yousuf PAK
5 Steve Waugh (c)
6 Andy Flower (Wk Bats) ZIM
7 Andrew Flintoff ENG
8 Shaun Pollock SA
9 Anil Kumble IND
10 Waqar Younis PAK
11 Coutney Walsh WI
12 Daniel Vettori NZ
13 Curtly Ambrose WI
14 Stephen Fleming NZ
15 Chaminda Vaas SI
16 Mark Waugh AUS
Lol
@@uhhnaturaal ya lol
Nasser's bowling attack is just WOW! The best ever across all eras.
Yeah, batting is not too bad either 😁
You can pick 3 equally good attacks from that era. Any combo of Ambrose, Walsh, Donald, Pollock, Waqar, Gillespie, Saqlain, Kumble would work as well.
Nasser Rob
1. Hayden 1. Sehwag
2. Trescotick 2. G Smith
3. Ponting 3. Sangakkara
4. Tendulkar 4. Kohli
5. Lara 5. S Smith
6. Kallis 6. Stokes
7. Gilchrist (Wk) 7. ABD (Wk)
8. Akram 8. Cummins
9. Warne 9. Steyn
10. Murlitharan 10. Lyon
11. McGrath 11. Anderson
Excellent Podcast - I've enjoyed this a lot. The banter between Keysie and Nass is brilliant
No way Rob’s team is going to win any test match against Nas’s team, on any condition, on any pitch and whatever the outcome of the toss! I’m not talking stats here. Just the skill levels and mental makeup of Nas’s team is overwhelming to say the least!
Sachin, Lara, Ponting and Kallis's last chance to score atleast a fifty at Lord's.
When is the match ?
Now, what about a triangular series and the team from 1975 - 1990
Sunil Gavaskar
Gordon Greenidge
Viv Richards
Zaheer Abbas
David Gower
Ian Healy(wk)
Kapil Dev
Imran Khan (c)
Richard Hadlee
Abdul Qadir
Malcolm Marshall
Clive Lloyd should have Ben in place of Gordon Greenidge.
Where is the great wasim akram??
@@malikzaighamaminbhatti331 Bhai, Wasim Akram has been picked by Nasser Hussain in his side. The peak of Akram came in the 90s.
Greg chapell should have been a no brainer.. He was one of the greatest batsman of all time and i hated him for nearly destroying dada's career
1. S Gavaskar, 2. Shewag, 3. Bradman(VC), 4. Tendulkar, 5. Kallis, 6. Sangakara(C)(WK), 7. Sobers, 8. Dev, 9. Akram, 10. Warne, 11. Ambrose. 12. Murlitharan(in Asia in place of Dev).
Great to see Keys back...Nasser's is strong line up.. would take Tres out... for slayter
If Rob key is made an eng selector , then even the queen cannot save eng team
Bumrah!!!!!!
Dhoni? Saqalin? Harbajhan? Dravid? Akhter?
@@tikkunolam112 why Akhtar? He sucks. Ask Ross taylor. Lol
@@jairajsinghshaktawat6593 Well it depends on conditions and what you are looking for in a team. Dhoni as captain and keeper was exceptional... Harbhajan in second innings in Asia was unplayable .. so context I suppose... All great players ...
@@_psychopath_5623 Why don't you? I have and he said he's the only bowler he faced that he was scared ... yes he had success as well because he's a class act against pace but Akhter on his day was as good as any and the fastest ever...
Hayden
Sehwag
Ponting
Tendulkar
Lara
Kallis
Gilchrist
Akram
Steyn
McGrath
Murali.
Just unbeatable.
Warne for Murali
@@ArchibaldJacobs-i1k I agree. Also given the rules I would swap out Steyn for Ambrose.
I would pick Warne in place of Steyn as you already have two top notch pacers in Akram and Mcgrath to add to that Kallis can chip in with his guile of medium pace. I will go with 3 quicks and 2 spinners. But my keeper would be Sangakkara who could play long inngs compared to Gilly who was more of a dasher at times could cost his wicket
My thoughts on one of the discussions......I would say 90s to early 2000 was the best era for cricket .....you had great batmen......best spinners of all time....fastest bowlers.......best swing and seam bowlers.....balls that remain hard for 80 overs....more reverse swing...as you could get away with some ball tempering ....video analysis of batsman weakness.... drastic change in fielding standards....Viv and Gavaskar era comes the closest....yes don bradman was 20 years ahead of his time....as most great batsmen are....but if you watch videos of that time it really feels a lot easier than the modern era....at that time some people have played fc cricket till their late 40s....also less number of countries playing competitive cricket (only England)....history suggests that one player may do extremely well against one country....it is like Ian bell has average of 488 against bangladesh :)........yes Don has done well against other countries but they lack the structure and quality....also their were lack of variety in pitches..like Ponting not able to perform in Indian condition...or Aussie and English batmen faltering in SL ........still if one wants to look at only average...then Don Bradman is GOAT....but cricket is lot more than a number....like why there are selectors to select team...computer can do the same based on player averages.... ...not talking about the current era...let it pan out....:)....I would urge u to watch mid wicket tales...on prime....there are some footage of that era...u see bowling of Vinoo Mankad...considered as one of the best in India...also there are many tales of how unworthy influential players were selected to play.....so my best bet Ponting...Sachin and Lara....Sorry Viv and Gavaskar..:)
Don Bradman also scored all those runs on uncovered pitches. Think about that for a while, a ball jagging left and right, up and down, two paced and averaged 99.
Deluded, Bradman was the best by far
If Bradman's era was easier, then there would have been many other batsmen averaging 90+ in Test & FC cricket but there were none. ZERO. When one man is so much better than anyone else, in his era or any other era, you have to accept that he was a one & only. That's what makes him stand out above all whereas plenty of there are a ton of players who averaged in the 50's in all eras. Furthermore, Bradman played in era of uncovered pitches, so if it rained last night, you were playing on a mushy pitch, if you think that's easier than modern eras then you need to revisit your assumptions.
He was the greatest player of that era and even 20 30 years ahead of his era...however cricket has become more and more modern..when slight anamoly in one's technique is analysed so much by everyone.. .even ur strength may become ur weakness...look at him bat in old footages...he does not compare to modern era batsman.....we tend to value old things more and exaggerate even more when there are very less recordings......comparing eras I feel 90s were the best as explained above..
also I found 4 players having average of around 60 of that era. there may be more.. they were playing on those uncovered pitches.... as per your logic they would be better than everyone else of this era....
Kallis is the most underrated cricketer of all time.
Best all-rounder of all-time
1. V Richards
2. V Sehwag
3. R Ponting
4. S Tendulkar
5. J Kallis
6. K Sangakara
7. A Flintoff
8. S Warne
9. W Akram
10. M Marshall
11. G McGrath
Great team, i have choosen 9 out of 11 players just replace sehwag with dravid and flintoff with brian lara. You have 5 bowlers with kallis as all rounder and sehwag and sachin can bowl. Viv richards is aggressive batsmn and dravid is his calming opponent i doubt any team can beat this dream 11.
@@vatsalsingh1555 Sir I can agree on Dravid for Sehwag.
But Flintoff was more of a Fast bowler...in fact Ponting once said Flintoff was one of the best fast bowler he has ever faced...So i chose Fredie as an extra Pace option because the batting depth is more than enough in this team...and Kallis was not that quick to be considered as a genuine pacer.
Fantastic....thoroughly enjoyed...glad u uploaded on RUclips, so we could enjoyed that here in india
My team
Old era :
Hayden
Sehwag
Lara
Sachin
Ponting (C)
Kallis
Gilchrist
McGrath
Wasim
Waqar
Warne
--------------------
New Era:
Cook
Warner
Smith
Kohli
Williamson
ABD
Stokes
Steyn
Anderson
Ashwin
Lyon
-------
PS: Test matches aint like before. The oldies ll wipe the floor with new buds.
New is garbage
kris A no sanga? Really?
Per decade teams (players played most in that decade, or played the whole decade)
2010s
Warner
Cook
Kohli
Smith
ABDV
Stokes
Steyn
Lyon
Bumrah
Anderson
2000s
Sehwag
Hayden
Dravid
Ponting
Sachin
Kallis
Gilchrist
Warne
Brett Lee
Murali
McGrath
1990s
Saeed Anwar
Gary Kirsten
Lara
Sachin
Inzamam
Alec Stewart
Wasim
Kumble
Saqlain
Waqar
Ambrose
Earlier
Gavaskar
Haynes
Sir Viv
Clive Lloyd
Gary sobers
Kapil Dev
Imran Khan
Malcom Marshall
Dennis lilee
Joel garner
Michael holding
Anderson is home track bully add starc instead of him
Excellent effort... 👍👍👍👍
Its almost faultless and accurate as per my choice too.. Only two changes I would like to add-
2000s team : I think warne was not in his prime form, so I would like to take Shaun Pollock instead.
1990s team: I think warne was much much more penetrating than Kumble. And Murli was evolving. So I would take Warne as an automatic choice as the only spinner in 90s and Kumble has to sacrifice.
These type of arguements are always healthy abd refreshing!!
Do you realise how insane and standard perception based opinion it is of yours not to put the decade's highest wicket taker in 2010s team?
And you put Bumrah in there rather, silly.
Awesome man
Tendulkar Kohli Ponting Steve Smith Lara Kallis Gilchrist Wasim Akram Hadlee Warne McGrath my greatest XI
My Reserves
Ben Stokes Matty Hayden Pat Cummins Muralidaran Ab De villiers
Sorry Bradman
Rob looks younger than when he played for England
My team from players I've seen
Sehwag
Amla
Smith
Kohli(c)
Abd
Stokes
Jadeja
Ashwin
Steyn
Cummins
Bumrah
I just wish they allowed rob to pick kumble he was absolutely a legend for India.
So Rob refuses to pick Ashwin because he "Mankaded" someone, but picked Steve Smith even after ball tampering? Mankading is legal, ball tampering aint. And Lyon is nowhere near Ashwin, plus Ashwin is proper allrounder. Root or Williamson- either could have replaced Smith. Funny morality.
Gotta love Nasser. (I'm from Australia.) I knew he'd pick Ponting. I don't think you need Muralitharan if you have Warne.
Ricky Ponting is a great commentator now when he is working for sky during the English summer. I can listen to Ponting & sankagarra talk cricket for hours.
ALL time TEST XI (without any debate)
1. Sir Alastair Cook
2. Sir Donald Bradman
3. Brian Lara
4. Sachin Tendulkar
5. Jacques Kallis
6. Kumar Sangakkara (wk)
7. Sir Garfield Sobers
8. Shane Warne
9. Wasim Akram
10. Malcolm Marshall
11. Glenn Mcgrath
Bench
12. M Muralidaran
13. Dale Steyn
14. Sir Curtly Ambrose
15. Rahul Dravid
Keys, how could you forget Rangana Herath? He is significantly better than Lyon.
But lyon is better than him in bouncy and flat tracks
Lyon is the best spin bowler since last 10 years in test
No he's not. Lyon's got wickets all over the world whereas 65% of Herath's wickets were on dustbowls in Sri Lanka.
@A K nah only in India like all Indian bowlers.
@@tariniacharya4440 ashwin?
Lol Kohli and Stokes in same team will be confusing 😁
Don duck bowls a bit
Hey I don't understand Don duck what is that it's me Rohit gurung
Rohitgurung Rohitgurung look up we cricket
He can bat a bit as well
Sheesh Don relax
Supreme General Yh lol
Great to see rob back!!
Welcome back Rob Key, looking fresh as always!
Aggressive test team of all time
1) Sehwag
2) Hayden
3) gayle
4) Bradman
5) Viv
6) warner
7) Gilchrist
8) akram
9) marshall
10) Steyn
11) Murali
Gooch vs KP vs Root
I'll pick KP with my eyes closed, well we have to 😂😂
Gooch due to his 333 runs against India although India was not a good bowling side in 1990s.
Gooch and cook are the 2 best batsmen in our history
Sorry but Virat Kohli is nowhere near Sachin Tendulkar whether its Tests or ODIs. The rules in Virat's time favor batting now. And the bowlers even was superior in Sachin's time.
3rd team of Dravids and Pujaras. We just bat for 5 days!!!!
3rd teams of blockers
1) gawaskar
2) cook
3) Younis Khan
4) dravid
5) pujara
6) Chanderpaul
7) bj Watling
8) vettori
9) Zaheer Khan
10) kumble
11) Walsh
Here bowlers are also not attacking but defensive (bowls line and length waits batsman to make mistake) along with super defensive batsman
@@ravishkazi7371 no Sibley
I think u forgot of Dravid 50 in 22 balls
The side camera for Nasa gives an incredible view of the his giant nose.
Ye 😂
Except trescothik brilliant team
his nostrils are incredible
Nathan Lyon over Saeed Ajmal and Rangana Herath is a joke Rob...
Dont under estimate nathan Lyon...his records are fantabulous even in bouncy tracks...
@@PradeepKumar-dg8ri He's decent but skill wise not in the same league as the other two I've mentioned... Even his stats are inferior to both Herath and Ajmal..
@@s.a.a8359 Big difference. Nathan Lyon is a match winner
Only skill will not win u a match mr/ms do u know the word consistency....test cricket is all about how consistent the bowlers are...Lyon is that kind of bowler....decent action and when it comes to ajmal...his action is not that proper....rangana herath's record in away matches is not that considerable....dont underrate Lyon he is also a match winner in his own way...
@@amaledward2147 So were the other two and I'm sure they won more games for their respective countries single handedly than Lyon..
Good decision by roobie in the end In place of Bumrah by putting lyon's name ..he is just fantastic bowler no doosra simple offspin...it is great lesson for youngsters that by simple off spin you can get heap of wickets..
Ye but i love how he wanted smith as his spinner 😂
Kohli's recent dip has shown what Sachin did was nothing short of amazing. Nobody comes close.
Steve smith if he keeps his average around 60 by the time of his retirement will come close but yeah as an Australian Sachin Tendulkar and Don Bradman are by far the GOAT test batters...
Kohli averages 50+ in every format plus has a great IPL record too. Sachin played only 2 formats. Kohli easily beats Sachin in white ball cricket
@@Roooop_1910 lol.
Sachin has been the highest scorer in multiple WCs. Played against better bowlers in tougher conditions.
Even in white ball cricket Kohli is no match for Sachin.
???? Sir Donald Bradman. Tendulkar isn't even close. Enough said. I am English by the way.
Tendulkar's average is not even in the top 10 😅
Money ball team
1. K sangakara
2. Lara
3. Ponting
4. Smith
5. Tendulkar
6. J kallis
7. B stokes
8. Ashwin
9. Akram
10. Warne
11. Ambrose
Specialist fielders
Specialist bowlers
Specialist batsmen
Win or draw team .
Second innings can be aggressive batsmen first if need be and batting line up can change according to certain pitchs.
1. Ponting
.2 lara.
3. stokes
4. Akram
5.warne faster runs
6. S Smith
7. Tendulkar
8. Kallis
9 sangakara
10. Ashwin
11. Ambrose
Rob Key is hilarious!
Nasser XI
Hayden
Trescothick
Ponting (C)
Tendulkar
Lara
Kallis
Gilly (WK)
Wasim
Warne
Murali
McGrath
Key's XI
Sehwag
G Smith (C)
Sangakkara
Kohli
Smith
Stokes
DeVilliers (WK)
Pattinson
Dale Steyn
Anderson
Lyon
Great selection of Kumar Sangkara and AB devilliers as WK
1. S Gavaskar, 2. Shewag, 3. Bradman(VC), 4. Tendulkar, 5. Kallis, 6. Sangakara(C)(WK), 7. Sobers, 8. Dev, 9. Akram, 10. Warne, 11. Ambrose. 12. Murlitharan(in Asia in place of Dev).
17:49 naseer choose sachin, your team 🏆
1.Hayden
2.Jack kallis
3.Ponting
4.Lara
5.Sachin
6.Gilchrist
7.Flintoff
8. Wasim Akram
9. Shane warne
(Capt)
10. Mcgrath
11. Muralidharan
Nasser's team wins again -- the side with the superior bowling attack almost always does. They'd still lose to the 1984 Windies team tho. In my mind, the best team in the history of team sports.
The difference in quality between the two eras is staggering. Nasser's B team (Dravid, Ambrose, Donald, Steve Waugh, Waqar, etc.) would destroy Rob's A team 😂
Why do these player forget about the legend of Andy Flower??? Even with all Gilly has done, there is no other cricketer in test history to average more than Andy as Wicket Keeper, he averages 50+ ...!!!
Nas missed Rahul Dravid! Seriously? Test Cricket and no Rahul Dravid Nas? :'3
My XI's
Nasser's Era
Matthew Hayden
Sanath Jayasuriya
Brian Lara
Sachin Tendulkar
Steve Waugh (c)
Jacques Kallis
Adam Gilchrist (wk)
Wasim Akram (2)
Shane Warne
Curtly Ambrose
Glenn McGrath (1)
12th Muttiah Muralitharan