How about doctors? Should people get into medical school based on skill, or based on a quota? Imagine going to a neurologist who has no clue what she's doing. This was very disappointing for me. They should have the most challenging requirements of all.
@@phantom8699 The point is that we all know full well that if you're hiring on diversity, you're going to get worse people. Because if you wouldn't have hired the person on skill alone, they are by definition worse than the person who would have been hired on skill alone.
A medical professor once said “I’m holding everyone to the same standard and won’t hesitate to fail you, because one day I’ll be old and I don’t want my life support device to be designed or operated by someone who got the job to fill a quota.”
some years ago I watched a video of a group of women who wanted to be firefighters. the women on the video couldn't even lift the firehose, and the whole thing looked like the 3 stooges. I'd show these kids that video and ask them if their house was on fire, would they want those women to go and put out the fire, or would they prefer a group of men who can get the job done regardless of what color they are.
@@Jerseybytes2 as a Counterpoint I remember the story of Sandy Riddell. She decided she wanted to be a firefighter, but was told that no woman could pass the physical test necessary to qualify for the training. Learning what was required, she left and trained with weights for a year and reapplied. Not only did she pass the physical test but she set the record for many of the events.
@@markjordan348 Retired firefighter here. There are women who can perform firefighting tasks quite well. There are also many who cannot. Twenty odd years ago, we had a woman who was hired only because the city was lawsuit-shy if they didn't hire her. Years later, one of the guys who gave her the agility test told me that they were ordered to make sure she passed. She was 5'3", about 100 lbs and was totally incapable of starting a chainsaw, raising a ladder, pulling charged lines, holding any nozzle over an inch-and-a-half size, lifting a stretcher, swinging an axe with any effect, was terrified of heights, etc; etc; She was also a fanatical, man-hating feminist who threatened lawsuits any time an attempt was made to hold her accountable for her shortcomings. She expected the department and the men around her to make special accommodations for her inabilities. It was an impossible situation. She eventually just failed to show up for her shift one day, and filed a frivolous lawsuit against the city, the department, and even individuals (not me, oddly. She hated me). The city offered a cash settlement of about 1/20th of what she filed for. She took it and ran. She was employed for about 4 years. It was wrong that she was hired, wrong that she lasted as long as she did because the city was afraid to get rid of her, and wrong that she saw a dime in the end. Sorry for the long rant, but it's been a sore spot with me for years. She was worse than useless and simply horrible on every level.
College professor here. The reality is that conversations like these may be the very first time anyone on campus has engaged these students in a simple critical thinking exercise about their beliefs. That illustrates how politically monolithic campuses are these days. Campuses are often ideological bubbles surrounded by reality.
Colleges sure have changed in the last 20 years. When I went I boycotted a class because the black professor was having a known black bigot as a guest in his class. I said I wouldn’t be there and I struck to it. The next class no hard feelings. Things have obviously worsened.
And as a 20 year old college student I agree with you here. I know of examples of this in my own college (in Eastern Connecticut) since most students don't get questioned by professors about their political beliefs since they normally agree with each other. Instead they simply accept those beliefs (which are mainly far-left ideas politically). So as you said, many colleges become ideological bubbles as a result. But I also have to say I sometimes spend time thinking why so many in my generation act this way (refusing to have discussions about political beliefs when I'm the only one who seems to be involved in it).
Would you like your heart/brain surgeon to be a "diversity hire" (lower scores, but got in because of skin color or the like)?...... Wait you don't, shocker
Sad thing is 33 years ago as a Senior in High school we regularly had to use critical thinking in class discussions...flash forward to 2015 and I'm in my 3rd year of University I was amazed when kids in an Upper Division History class had to have Critical Thinking explained to them...at that time my own son was 15 and he knew what Critical Thinking was and why it needed to be applied in writing an essay for example...his teachers always complimented me on teaching him Critical thinking at an early age and I always blew their minds by telling them that we taught him how to think critically while he was in Elementary school...
@@spardaprowess3277 No, they don't. They think about one issue and give the politically correct answer for that one issue. Then on to the next issue. They never make a comparative analysis in their minds between the answers they've given until confronted with the opposing answers to, what are basically, the same circumstances.
@Kevin Udly - So true. But to the credit of the students in this video, they were able to reprocess their belief in a flawed ideology, when faced with a reason to apply critical thought. That was unexpected, and a very nice surprise.
Still these guys do not understand what they just said. They turned around 180° within a couple of seconds and don’t even realise it. This is our future generation…..
If only the school systems were equal, there might be more diversity on college campuses. I'd love to see a program were the kids from a "good" school get bussed to a "bad" school and the kids from the "bad" school get to go to the "good" one, just to see if it makes a difference and if so, by how much.
The funny thing is that they've ginned up some pseudo studies to claim that more diverse work places outperform others. Of course they didn't compare to ones that focus on meritocracy, nor did they control for workplaces that already respond quickly to the marketplace (including the current wave of "diversity" requirements). So they can now claim that diversity in colleges and workplaces equals better performance, and no one calls out the poor studies for fear of being labeled "racist".
Liberal logic: Quotas that benefit minorities: Diversity is our strength. Quotas that don't benefit minorities: It should be based on their talents and skill.
Exactly. This is the kind of ass-backwards logic that liberals use. Unfortunately, these college kids are a product of liberal professors and what they read on social media. They don't know why they believe something.....they just believe it. Hopefully when they get older and out in the workplace, they realize that diversity quotas don't make sense.
They are constructing a trap for themselves based on virtue. People are not stupid and will exploit the rules of the game to get ahead. Every structure that holds our society together will be attacked under this idea. Post modernist ideology will seek to replace every structure. They are creating standards to equalize rights based on groups rather than a standard for all based on merit through talent and hard work individually. How can anyone not see that this is the opposite of inclusive on a broad scale? It is racist. Making decisions based on group identity has lead to millions of deaths when it goes too far. There is potential in all cultures and backgrounds so their argument that one groups ability to prosper is oppressing another groups ability and the solution is equal outcomes is pure bullshit. Addressing the roadblocks for equality of opportunity is where they should be focused. These professors know this, their goal is not equality at all in my opinion. They know the history and believe they are smart enough to revisit ideologies that have failed many times. They are doing it for power, they wish to mold society because they are arrogant. The enemy is people who push these agenda's. They are playing games with our future as if it is their decision to make. Consider these people in the same way you might view the early supporters of the National socialist party in Germany during the early 30's or Mao supporters during his rise. They need to be stopped. If they are allowed to continue, this could lead to another very dark time in our history. If people could have stopped Stalin or Hitler, should they have done it? Look at all the red flags, they are there. Citizens need to take away power from the media, reform the higher learning institutions and fire radical teachers and watch your government, they are creatures of opportunity who love power more than their country.
what this segment points out is how easy lies fall apart,and how just a nice and simple conversation completely melted away their strong pro diversity feelings, that's why they have to censor and sub-humanize the opposition, cause once the truth clicks in, its there to stay
Your bar is set awfully low when all they have to do is not have a pathetic and threatening melt-down to be 'applauded'.. These people don't actually have opinions, they merely go along with whoever is nearby at the moment.
@Gooodzz I was one of those kids. Poor family, small rural town. Yet I have done so many things in my life peoples' jaws drop when they hear it all. I had an opportunity to go to Harvard on a full ride, could have been or done anything I wanted, if i wanted it bad enough. Top student everywhere i went. It's not a matter of money so much as it is other factors.
@Gooodzz your lousy excuses are what the demographic you bleed for live by. Total b.s. If you want it bad enough, you work for it. Earn it! My grandparents came over from Ireland in the 1920s with nothing. Felt the anti-Irish waves, yet worked hard and succeeded. Get real, kid!!!
*_Isaiah 55.6 Seek the Lord while He may be found, Call upon Him while He is near. 7 Let the wicked forsake his way, And the unrighteous man his thoughts; Let him return to the Lord, And He will have mercy on him; And to our God, For He will abundantly pardon._* _Jesus Christ loves you. Only Jesus Christ saves. Repent and be saved. God bless you, and the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ, and the love of God, and the communion of the Holy Spirit be with you and your family._ -------
Here's an idea: remove all the identifying info from applications. Assign every applicant a number. Then, judge the applicants by their merits. That sounds like the most fair to me.
@@orevel You don't start at the university level, though. If a student, no matter their race, isn't prepared then you set them up for failure. Not only that, but for any students of another race or gender it can be harmful by reinforcing negative stereotypes they've learned. The "I guess my uncle was right, Mexicans just aren't as smart as us" kind of backwards thinking. I'm all about need based scholarships so that students can be set up for success, but if you can't make it in by the same standards as everyone else then it's a waste. We aren't going to lower the acceptable standards for medical treatment, engineering, etc. so why should we start anyone down that path that is set up to fail? College entrance requirements exist for a reason. Instead of waiving requirements, let's help kids of all backgrounds get a good education starting in kindergarten, not with university level courses. My sister lives in NYC and she overheard a girl that was really upset on the subway. She'd be accepted into a prestigious university that she wasn't prepared for. She was trying to catch up but other students were way ahead because her high school didn't offer the kind of prep needed, and she was going to have to drop out. She was miserable, but someone out there is probably patting themself on the back for "helping" her.
@@orevel If you have a job right now, but your boss needs to fire one person and hire someone who is the opposite race as you are but is obviously not as skilled as you are in your specific field to meet a diversity quota, and you weren’t even sure if you could find another job, would you be willing to give up your job to this person? After all, don’t forget, it’s not nice to not be inclusive.
@@Lustie You're setting up a hypothetical that is obviously rigged to have people side with your argument. First, your boss is not allowed to fire someone because they are not the right race. That would in fact open them up to a racial discrimination lawsuit. Second, in your example you say that the "opposite race" individual is "obviously not as skilled as you are" , how would you determine that? Just an unfounded accusation meant to bias your hypothetical. Third diversity quotas don't exist the way they're being represented here. Affirmative action regulations provide that goals serve as "targets reasonably attainable by means of applying every good faith effort to make all aspects of the entire affirmative action program work" and that goals "may not be rigid and inflexible quotas, which must be met." Quotas can only be imposed by judicial order to correct a pattern of blatant discrimination. Under the Civil Rights Act, you cannot base a hiring decision, in whole or in part, on a person's race/gender. Affirmative action is intended to ensure that employers hire the most qualified people, including members of groups that previously have been subject to unlawful discrimination. You created a loaded hypothetical that made way to many unfounded assumptions.
Kudos to the presenter for NOT putting the students on the defensive and possibly getting them to think. People beyond college would rarely consider changing their minds.
"Skill-based" is the correct answer across the board - whether in academics or in sports. I've been saying this for years - no names, race or gender should appear on a college application - it should have only the potential student's SSN on it. Who did the best? Who outperformed the other applicants? THAT'S who should be admitted. The student's other "qualifiers" are not relevant. If you don't want to use SSN, assign the applicant a random number. This is NOT HARD, people!
You cannot say skill based due to the fact that we are not talking about skill and more so opportunity. If a student wasn’t introduced to things because of the environment they grew up in placed them in a school district that was inferior to others around the country. And as we know this is all due to your financial status. And that goes to show that they want you for abilities on the field but don’t care otherwise. It is a system designed for some to prosper and others to fail and until people are ready to admit these truths all their arguments are void and pointless.
1. First plan on the Georgia Guidestones is for 93% of all people to be disappeared. (That includes blacks, whites, Mexicans, Christians...and Democrats aren't safe either.) 2. True width of Washington Monument is 666 inches wide on each of its 4 sides. 3. Former elite banker R-onald Ber-nard says most billionaires are Luciferians (Satanic). All atheist nations end up in poverty and dictatorship, unless helped by Christians. Jesus said, and you shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free.
This is an old argument from around 2014. Same is said "if cops are racist and target blacks, then we need to address the gender arrest gap and either arrest more women or let 40% of men arrested go free"
Plus Affirmative action also goes against what MLK preached in his "I have a dream" speech.... "A man being judged not by the color of his skin, but by the content of his character. "
Funny thing happens when you poll the students on Socialism as well. You ask them if they agree with Socialism and equity. Many of them are all about the idea, until you ask them if they would be willing to give up some of their GPA to give it to students who have not performed as well. Suddenly they get upset because you are suggesting removing something they have earned and giving it to someone else. The funny thing about Socialism, is it’s always a good idea to the people who may be receiving, and a good idea when you’re taking OTHER peoples money to give to people we don’t have as much. They always seem to suddenly change their tune, when it’s THEIR money you’re talking about taking.
I'm actually surprised that the students didnt try to make excuses as to why one quota is bad and the other is good. They finally learned something on campus.
Such a great example…merit doesn’t count ….. except when it really matters … like football. Sigh… The answers universally with this generation “I didn’t know that or I didn’t think about it.” Our future is being indoctrinated. Thank you for what you’re doing!
@Anglosaurus Rex Many people of all backgrounds come to America to escape socialistic rule. Whites are already a minority. I don't think it's a big deal. If the concept is good then ALL people will like it.
The lefties avoid debares because they are never challenged. The media and Academia only challenge the ideals, opinions and thoughts of those they oppose. Since a left wing lunatic never uses truth, facts, reason or any other logical means to debate their viewpoints they never develop any skills to intelligently discuss or debate most topics. Feelings and emotions are they only criteria they seem to employ which means lefties either abandon a debate or it devolves into a profanity strewn personnel attack on the individual using logic and reason.
they are just regurgitating the socialistic viewpoints drilled into their unsuspecting brains from their communist teachers. One Campus Reform asked whether money should be taken from "richer" people and given to poorer people who won't work, they all said YES. but when that same logic was applied to their test results, ON NO! We can't be taking from MY grades, because I worked hard for it, while others just partied...
@@cuckingfunt9353 That's the best way to do it, letting themselves realize it's not really logical (Perfect execution). But if you insult them, call them stupid and things like that, they won't change their views. Also when you try hardly to prove them wrong, you often get the same results.
It's already happening and they don't like it. In 5 years time all of this will be upended when they realize their quality of life has diminished due to this nonsense.
It’s amazing how proudly we declare the lofty ideas and restrictions we place on others and how quickly we reject the application of the same ideas and restrictions when they apply to us once self interest becomes involved. This is one of the very foundations of true inequality
The Onion??? WTF you talking about, the Onion is NOT a liberal mouthpiece, the Onion if anything shines a light on how stupid Liberals are. Jon Stewart on the other hand is a Liberal Mouthpiece, the guy is worth like 100 million dollars yet pretends to speak for the working man. "Trump Bad, Biden Good", I used to love "The Daily Show" but then it became a mouthpiece for the Democrats.
its so sad to see how much students are invested in physicality, and so little in learning witch is way more important ,sports is a past time, you want the best learners so you get the most skilled workers ,and those who do not cut the mustard are not wasting time learning stuff that more and better skilled people will shade them out in the market place, its just an ego thing, you can have a totally cool and very rich life without being educated ,you can be dumb and rich or super smart and poor, and while its important that we have educated people ,its totally unimportant to have everyone educated,,leave it to the ones who are good at it,,and you go open a plumbing supply or something
@@tbirum They said, the "children" of the two. You are saying the same thing. One are the leftists that can't see their hypocrisy/stupidity and one is the conservative showing them that.
I guess being knowledgeable in something academically isn’t a skill regardless of race. Quotas aren’t fair on people lower on the color chart who actually earned their spot
Not to mention that workers want qualified co-workers, customers want qualified personnel and so on and so forth. Saying that for those brainwashed into thinking that a company "winning" must be pillaging and plundering others, since sinful people do sinful things means we should do away with freedom ( free markets etc. ) .
@Tom Brady you missed his point buy a country mile. He is being sarcastic, he's basicly saying a person getting a highly skilled job just because they are black and not because they are the best person for the job is a very stupid way to hire.
@Tom Brady I can't name a minority doctor but I can name a diversity quota hired as POTUS back in 2008. By the way, how's that still working out for America?
Colleges are great because of how diverse they are. Environments that have lots of differing opinions and perspectives and background are way better learning environments than colleges where every student is a wealthy smart kid.
These colleges are prestigious because of their diversity so if you did away with that diversity no one would want to go to them. If you ask a prospective student if they’d rather go to a school where everyone is similar or one that is diverse everyone is gonna choose the diverse one because why else would you be going to college. It’s the same reason that colleges brag about their demographics because they want people from all backgrounds coming to their school.
You’re looking at it from such two dimensional lens and you’re not thinking about the actual application and reasoning for this diversity in these environments. Also they’re not letting in random students. It’s not like “oh let’s just let in this 2.0 gpa kid because he’s black and screw over this 4.0 white kid” they’re choosing between two qualified applicants and one QUALIFIED applicant might get the edge because they come from a more interesting background. Would you rather let in a 4.2 gpa rich white kid, in a school of all 4.2 rich white kids, or would you let in a 4.0 gpa Latino kid?
I really appreciate that the kids were willing to be open minded and reconsider their positions when confronted with a conflicting position. Many adults I know much older than them are fundamentally unable to do the same thing
It's kinda sad that all these kids default to virtue signaling and regurgitating an answer before thinking about it. That one girl in the orange flip-flopped HARD and didn't bat an eye.
It’s not about equality, for them. It’s about equity. That’s why the oppressed victim mentality is running rampant. Because they believe the more One is able to check the boxes of the qualifications, in what they perceive as oppression - the more opportunities they feel they are entitled to. If it was about equality - it wouldn’t matter, what boxes they check; everyone has the same opportunity, to earn their way into whatever field they desire pursuing.
well, at least l learned to question authority when l moved over from China to here. The long march described in American textbook is quite different from ccp textbook.
It looks like they’re afraid to ask these questions or think this way. Once ‘given permission’ by the interviewer they open up and stop towing the company line. That is indoctrination.
They're no longer students, but merely puppets. Students are taught to be producitve and informed citizens (at least by design) What we have are brow-beaten cowards who piss themselves at the tought of calling out someone for their lack of effort , lack of skill/ability, or violent and aggressive behaviors. All because someone might call them a wayyysis. A nation of blanket holding thumbsuckers.
1. First plan on the Georgia Guidestones is for 93% of all people to be disappeared. (That includes blacks, whites, Mexicans, Christians...and Democrats aren't safe either.) 2. True width of Washington Monument is 666 inches wide on each of its 4 sides. 3. Former elite banker R-onald Ber-nard says most billionaires are Luciferians (Satanic). All atheist nations end up in poverty and dictatorship, unless helped by Christians. Jesus said, and you shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free.
They've actually changed the meaning of critical thinking for college students. Now they are teaching them NOT to trust their logic and ability to form conclusions, to be counterintuitive, basically, to accept the opinions of "experts." They've completely flipped the meaning.
talent , talent is talent , nearly choked i was laughing so much , have any of these children ever sat down and had a thought of their own . well done to the young lady interviewer.
@@awy1977 Yes they do. And I also suspect there is a conspiracy to push this trend at colleges/university's. How do they do that? I was on campus at age 35 and saw some disgusting liberal professors. Who give them their marching orders? CIA?
Yes, but I'd wager you could/should say this about *literally everyone/every citizen,* save for people who have careers involving these issues (politicians, news outlets,...). Most US citizens haven't thoroughly researched/devised their own opinions on all, or even many political issues. That takes serious work/effort.
Little do they realize all the internet they use are run on cell towers. Which are run by fossil fuel.... so......... until they stop posting videos/ watching videos / instant messaging.... I will continue to travel 🤣
They support a crackdown on fossil fuel because they don't spend even 1 minute learning about how the alternatives (sans nuclear) takes more energy to produce than the energy it gives out. To say nothing of how solar panels, wind turbines and batteries cannot be recycled and only have a 10-25 year life cycle. They are quite literally campaigning for less efficient and therefore more expensive energy that will impoverish the world.
@@DeusExDraconian Are you kidding me? Almost everything you just said is flat out incorrect. Nuclear energy does not “take more energy to produce than the energy it gives out”. This is such an utterly moronic statement that I don’t even need a source. Pay attention to thermodynamics in chemistry next class. You are (partially) correct about the lifespan of the things you listed, but you say that as if it’s somehow aiding an argument for fossil fuels when the fossil fuel industry damages entire landscapes, pollutes water supplies, and most importantly, is the primary culprit behind excessive greenhouse gas emissions in the past few centuries. Your argument is akin to saying “Why should I stop smoking if I’m going to breathe in the same air as all the other smokers in the world?” The difference is incomparable. Less efficient does not mean more expensive, ESPECIALLY in the energy sector. But you don’t seem to have any conception of what either of these mean when it comes to energy. Fossil fuels are BY FAR the least efficient source of energy at our disposal. The majority of the energy from the fuels we burn is lost as radiant heat. The reason why we use it is because it’s cheap and readily available. Economics. Duh. Solar is more efficient and cheaper than fossil fuels: news.energysage.com/solar-energy-vs-fossil-fuels/ Nuclear is FAR more efficient and, while expensive to start up, infinitely cheaper to run than fossil fuel plants: www.energy.gov/ne/articles/nuclear-power-most-reliable-energy-source-and-its-not-even-close
@@desuvult15 Re-read what he wrote. Sans means, not including. You have a lot of gross conceptual errors. Fossil fuels are more or less clean. The water, the air, the environment has never been more clean. Nuclear is not efficient but the fuel is basically free. Nat Gas plants run 70% efficient Nuclear is more expensive than Nat Gas with current NG prices. Solar panels will run 98% efficient, but they only work where you have, wait for it, wait..sunshine. Coal and nuclear are about 30% with nuclear fuel being basically free. You can get get up to 45% efficient coal plants with very high pressure/temp cycles. Wind takes power from a "free" source, just like the solar. Again, not scalable. Hydro same thing. The impact of Fossil fuels to our environment when weighed with the benefit is small.
The part that I’m most impressed by is how they quickly understood their flawed thinking and adjusted it. Good for them for being open minded and actually questioning the things they’ve been told to think.
I somewhat also blame their parents for not teaching them... my parents aren't perfect, but they taught me a little, plus the grace of God was enough to keep me from becoming like these....
That was masterfully crafted, and not to throw it in their face either. It logically and reasonably proved their stances wrong, and allowed them to figure it out on their own (which is ridiculous that you’d have to explain it in such detail for college students). Good content as always
This piece is a perfect example of keeping your mind open to other perspectives and comparisons. It reveals these kids aren’t dumb. They are being deceived with a one view liberal agenda. For the most part I believe we should approach these kids differently than the way we typically treat them. Give them something that is so obvious and repackage it into something they can relate to. It’s going to take some very creative people to change the course of their thought driven by the lefts agenda. An really smart person 🤷♀️ said “There’s more than one way to skin a cat”. Cliche, yes, but , cliches are cliches for a reason.
its all antiwhiteism minorities have made it so whenever white people are better at someting its only because of racism but any other groupit is basically acceptable
Excellent way of making people truly understand what DEI actually means. Most people don't understand an issue, they just rely on media sound bites on how you should react. Many can't or won't explain why they stand for what they stand for because they haven't taken the time to try to understand the topic until someone comes along to give them context. Being against DEI doesn't make you racist, being a racist makes you racist because you are incapable of making up your own mind based on facts.
So they think if a kid's talent is throwing a ball then it should be about who is best but if someone's talent is their mind, their studies and striving for excellence in the classroom it's not about who is best anymore. Unbelievable.
The nice thing about football is that there's a clear winner and loser, so it's hard to argue about "well we're actually better because" if you lost on the field. It's interesting how much more logical they all were when it came to that.
@@stoneagearcher3477 Or housing if they fall short at some point, or food if they get hungry, or long term medical care, or college etc. etc. Illegals and minorities get first pick.
@@jron3747 I was just about to say the same thing. Sadly these kids thought about it for 1/2 a second and I'm sure when right back to their indoctrinated way of life.
I know huh. I interview people for Cyber Jobs often....I dont even really listen to anything other than their answers to my questions. Those with skills are hired.....I dont even look at the schools because to me its a joke. Could be someone from MIT or a community college.....I look at their certifications and ask question based on those as well
@@vincentgarcia9784 It's too bad because a few people actually did go to colleges where critical thinking is encouraged. I was fortunate enough to be one of those people. But I understand why my degrees aren't of much value these days.
I had to watch this twice because the first pass I was laughing too hard to hear most of it L O L O L O L O L THERE WERE SO MANY LIGHTS GOING ON IN THEIR HEADS!!! Excellent. Work. 💯
I really like how you aren’t out there just looking for a “gotcha” moment or trying to make people feel stupid. You make them critically think and they naturally change their mind. Love this. Need more of it.
Yes. That’s a must. Always refrain from insulting political morons. Never point out their moronhood directly. If you do that, they will just dig into their flawed beliefs further out of spite. You must show them the undeniable error of their ways gracefully in order to change their views and help them.
These kids are adorable, like talking to a bunch of children. “Oh no, sports teams should be the best, most skilled people but of course that same logic shouldn’t be applied to anything else” 🙄
@@bluehotdog2610 Wouldn't the most "hard working" people have the highest scores, highest grades, and most proficient SKILLS? How does anything you said refute the original comment that society should be structured based on ABILITY? You are confused.
@@bluehotdog2610 How is it any different? It is about ability. When you need a cardiologist, do you want a diversity hire or do you want the best one available? Merit based is going to get efficiency and that is far more important, especially when your life is on the line.
Well they do waste time on their first year on the basics before specializing in their actual field. If the average american was intelligent the world would be totally fck.
This is exactly why the founding fathers went for a Representative Republic instead of Straight Democracy. I don't think they understood the level of corruption that would creep in, but would 6 branches of checks and balances really been less corruptible?
I’m so proud of them ;_; they ALL SAID “I hadn’t really thought about it”. But now that they did, they changed their stance, which is an important skill to develop!!!
I am actually happy about this video. They didn’t bullshit their way out of the double standard. Just just “hadn’t thought about it before”. Which means all we have to do is get people to think in a simple, straight-forward manner. That’s a win 👍
What a shame that these college students couldn't do a little bit of critical thinking and figure this out on their own. This is the reason Rush Limbaugh used to refer to them as "young skulls full of mush."
The bigger question then becomes how did these students get to their age without ever having considered this before? Could it be there's extreme bias in the media and politics to specifically prevent people asking these questions and considering these issues?
no. bad for these kids. they do not have open minds. they are simply easy to control. why did they not research this issue in the first place. censorship maybe.
When it comes to sport diversity is really the last fucking thing you need you want big guys who can throw the ball hit the ball run the ball smack a puck on ice etc and you want the toughest you can get for this diversity has no place in sport also Military and politics
@@kurtpunchesthings2411 quotas and other forced diversity stunts have no place anywhere. If Asians were the only people who properly can do and teach math I would be all for 100% Asian math teachers. You won't find excellence in any place where mediocrity is allowed over meritocracy.
These kids they chose to edit into the video aren't intelligent enough to answer the question effectively and fell into a trap of the agenda of the person asking the question. Ask any vaguely intelligent person those questions and they'll shred the point that the video is trying to make
They aren’t teaching critical thinking here tho. They are using logical fallacies and begging the question to manipulate people into believing a certain mindset lol. They used things that are closely related in idea but not correlated in a real world spectrum to force them to have a predetermined opinion. They aren’t teaching critical thinking at all lol
@@Ginger7322 Don't warp their words. Kora never said, implied, nor suggested that critical thinking was being taught in this video; they specifically stated, "at home."
@@supercala332 Saying "this is why it is important to teach critical thinking at home" definitely suggests that they were trying to have them think critically in this video lol
@@Ginger7322 No, Cooper, it doesn't. That's overthinking the words that you've read/heard, and it's the same mistake you see mainstream media make all the time, which is taking something completely out of context instead of looking at it at face value. Not everything that's said has some hidden meaning to it.
@@supercala332 that’s is not what is going on at all 😂😂😂 if someone watches a video, and responds with a comment starting with “that is why it’s important to do “blank”” then it is either implying that they are lacking that thing or the people learned that lesson in the video. So the commenter is either stating that these students lack critical thinking skills or they learned about critical thinking from participating in this video…
The issue is deeper than that. Quotas are primarily a giant cover-up. Political leaders know that they can avoid ever having to answer for their pathetic failures in the lower socioeconomic public school systems if we just artificially force these underperforming students into colleges. They do NOT care.
There's no need to address inner-city school violence, or lack of attendance, poor grades etc, if you just keep shoveling students from that area into a college slot they don't deserve. Why bother to fix those broken schools in the Ghetto, where many of the schools are run down and half functioning, "More students of X Y Z race have been to college under me than any other X Y Z representative...(Just nevermind about the schools that closed/number of people who dropped out, or flunked out entirely)."
Which actually just leads to higher droppout rates as unqualified individuals don't get pushed through their courses. You end up with worse racial ratios after the first year.
Yes of course blame the schools, teachers, etc. instead of actually blaming the students, the parents and the society they perpetuate for not trying harder in school, for turning to selling drugs and crime. It's not the government's responsibility to raise their children better but you can blame Democrats for the welfare state and for destroying the black household and family unit, that much I will give you.
college and work situations do not have to do with being the best. Do you actual think without discrimmination that white men would have been dominate in most things throughout history.?
Who do you want to hire for a leadership position in your company-- Talent is Talent guy or 'I meet the diversity quota' ? This is why so many businesses are hurting, they keep pushing diversity on the hiring teams, and the less qualified person gets the job based on their gender and race. Are you a white male? They tell you that you're privileged, but with all the Diversity and virtue signaling these days, good luck getting a job, you're the bottom of their 'must have' quotas- I suggest you start identifying as LGBTQIA++ / Gender Fluid or Something to hit a Diversity button for them!
Personally, I want the best person building the airplane I would fly in, design and build the bridge I drive my family over, design and build the 40 story elevator I go up in. I don’t want it based on a color quota. I don’t care what they look like, I just want them to be the best at their job. This sensitivity thought process is ridiculous.
Ohh--we will have the best people building and maintaining those things. But that does not mean they will be any good at it. IMO, if we can't reason and figure out reality, than we will no longer be human, but closer to a farm animal who can talk, but have no idea what it is saying,------like most college graduates today.
Building the airplane you say? Don't be silly, that's a labourers job. Diversity need not be enforced there. Similarly not to those who work at sewage treatment plants. Diversity quotas only apply to the top jobs.
@@justinm2697 Building the airplane, designing the airplane, checking the airplane, flying the airplane, maintaining the airplane ... Everything should be based on whether you qualify for the job AND perform it accordingly. OF COURSE not all jobs require the same skills and qualifications. I would DEFINITELY want the person building the airplane to be skilled and qualified - PERIOD.
@@EarthSurferUSA Might want to do some RESEARCH if you truly believe that. I was in the USAF on January 28, 1986. READ and then research the GIGANTIC SCREWUP NASA pulled with the solid rocket boasters. Well some group got a "SET ASIDE" contract. Ask the family and crew. If you get an answer, let us know.
Yup which is fucking sad because diversity quotas will impact their future job search, politics they end up living under, and everything else, were as none of them played sports to start with, and the outcome of a sportsball game wont make their taxes go up or have them teach their kids that they're evil for their skin color
They just said why its bad, "we wanna win, talent talent talent" So why dont they want society to win? lol "Now I think about it" lol They never thought about it at all, they are just regurgitating what they are told to think.The hypocrisy is real folks.
@@jimmoses6617 Thanks for the comment. Note "the best person" doesn't always mean the smart or smartest person, just the best (possible, available) person in the candidate pool at a particular time and place. As such, even publicly funded schools can do well to find their best available students, even if on a more absolute basis these students aren't always (considered) the cream of the crop.
I take it you are socialist then. Because that concept only works if you believes we should all have the same standard of schooling - at least in our formative years. You can't claim to believe "may the best person win" and then say you don't have a problem with someone getting a massive head start through private schooling or tutoring as happens in a capitalist system. This video is dumb, if you can identify discrimination that had led to white players being under-represented on the football team then we can start to talk about the necessity of quotas to correct it. Frankly the relatively low percentage of black players who are QBs compared to every other position (other than K or P) is probably the most likely example of discrimination you can find on the football field.
@@cookslooking10 Not exactly. "May the best person win" applies as long as the criteria and process in picking / selecting / rewarding the best person is the same for all participants / candidates. Whether the participants / candidates have the same exact degree of talent, skill, knowledge, training, experience, and resources, be this natured or nurtured, before the selection process begins is immaterial to the vigor of the "best person" practice. Perhaps it might seem only fair to some that participants should have almost, if not the exact same, equal competence before the selection begins. But this is impractical. Insistence on this would mean canceling all competition (matches, games, examinations, tests etc) e.g. the Olympics. The medal winners generally not only have better trainers and coaches, but also better resources in terms of government encouragement, societal affection for the particular sport, and so on. Sometimes even geography is an advantage e.g. ski medal winners tend to come from snowy countries. Moreover, the assumption that the better endowed (richer, more schooled etc) participants would always win, however defined, is suspect. I had grade school classmates who were quite endowed but did not become successful persons, be this in financial or achievement terms; whereas quite a few less endowed, even disadvantaged, classmates have achieved something in their life.
@@jimmoses6617 ummm... schools use grades to figure this out; really kind of the entire point is to promote the smartest, most driven and brightest among us to take more education to later achieve greater results and outcomes. This should be done from a complete "color and gender blind" objective reasoning standpoint. Arguing that race should be a consideration for acceptance; are you saying we should also adjust grades based on skin color? When they hit job market with degree; adjust the bar for hiring? Seems like the wrong way to adjust outcomes.
@@jimmoses6617 welp we can agree to disagree. Schools also have to evaluate potential. You cannot simply give everyone a gold star and send them packing off to Harvard because of feels. Simply not how the world works.
*What if a white person worked harder and studied more, and got better test scores. Should his place at the university be given to someone that studied less and didn't work as hard just because of his skin color?*
What if a colored person worked harder and studied more, and got better test scores. Should his place at the University be given to someone that studied less and didn't with as hard just because his father was too poor to pay for tuition?
@@echochamber8350 yes his spot should be forfeited unless there is a special grant or possible loans available. That’s basic capitalism/economics. The school would close otherwise. In a perfect world the poor kid would get in but no system if perfect. Our system may be flawed in some aspects but it’s overall the most fair system available today.
Unfortunately university's didn't think that way. The univ. Of Ala &miss would still be all white till this day whether you qualify or not. Thats why the federal had to make corrections.
This is dumb. You can’t just try somebody out and cut them/fire them or not start them the next week. There’s no way to judge someone’s work ability that quick. And even if you do believe they have potential, you can not just red shirt them for that year. Work is totally different than sports. The fact is, people hire people because they may like somebody, the vibe they give off, or because of their race, even tho they have the same education and/or experience as another. This has nothing to do with physical talent
Let's take a moment to congratulate these kids for being open minded enough to change their minds and be brave enough to admit their initial views may be wrong.
@@andrewjankowski9650 this is the problem though isnt it?...its either "you 100% agree with me or you are the enemy". Even if they have not truly changed their minds, the fact that anyone in this day and age pauses, gives an argument a thought and accepts a logical conclusion is already way better than all the emotionally driven arguments. So yea I do think they deserve applause for this.
Thats exactly what the communists want. They want ur first reaction to be the crap they regurgitated at first and to not think critically. They’ve successfully dumbed down a whole generation.
If I’m flying in a plane I want the best pilot!! If I’m having surgery, I want the most skilled surgeon!!!!! Common sense is pretty much lost on this generation!!!!!!
To be fair, 1. they are still young. Most if not all under 22 years old. There's a lot of the world and life they haven't experienced yet like us older folks. 2. They're not "educated" as they are still in school.
@@squiggzzz the level of indoctrination is crazy but you are correct, many people grow out of leftism do to real life experience. This has to stop in schools though if we are to save the country.
@@LightningIguana But does it last? Do they walk away, keeping that position? I'm thinking that once they get with their like-minded friends, their "new position" disappears.
While watching a webcast of a SpaceX launch, I became curious as to the diversity of the company's employees when I noticed that the three talking heads they used were a black female, a black male and a white female. I then searched online for a group photo of the extraordinary and creative engineering teams at SpaceX. It seems as if the folks who actually do the important work at the company are 95% white males.
@@356ALX This. I can guarantee you that whoever decided on who to showcase, was not Elon. Elon himself has expressed that the problem is that there arent enough good engineers and that there is an IQ shortage, implying he believes in meritocracy. He didnt say "we havent build a moon base because we lack diversity".
@@MegaLBreezy Technological advancement, low crime rates, etc. Are you unfamiliar with what metrics determine the health of a civilization or are you just kvetching because someone shat on your delusional worldviews about "affirmative action" turning black people into Japanese people with magic?
Im wondering why is it even a question... Sports or any other field which requires a specific skill should always be done on merit basis not quotas... Btw great video.. love from 🇮🇳
You led them to the slaughter, ingenious question set, it was amazing to watch them do a 180 on the entirety of their beliefs in one minute. Proof beyond proof that they're just regurgitating virtuous talking points without even thinking it through.
Clearly wanting to select people on the basis of ability is more important for football players than for brain surgeons. The consequences of fumbling a football are just too great.
@@Originalman144 What I’ve seen is the HR departments of large companies will of course pull from diversity sources to make their goals. It’s still up to HR usually for a pre-screening, and up to the hiring manager in the final phase to determine if the candidate is the best fit. Sometimes the interview is on the phone so they don’t see the candidate. Yes, large corporations care about their ratios, but they also want the best fit. They are under some pressure these days to make their senior management look more diverse. It’s wrong to force someone out based on their skin color, but I do believe at the most senior levels it’s happening.
The more troubling issue is that every student was for diversity quotas and answered without skipping a beat after being asked the initial question and never gave legitimate answers as to why they feel diversity quotas are a supposed good thing and then once posed with the hypothetical about the same principle being applied to sports every single answer started out with “its skill” and “ I didn’t think about it like that” So before thinking these young adults are just spouting off a pc answer to a serious question without thinking about it. Regardless of how college is a political monolith ideologically these days, this sample group of young adults just showed that they lack critical thinking skills and the ability to sit and think about a topic or question before they answer and that inability to think has been instilled in them long before attending college.
Yeah when you consider that we are talking about public policy, and public policy ultimately meaning men with guns cramming this down everyone's throats, for anyone to want legislation without having really given it even the most casual of thought, is disturbing. Public policy should be concise, effective, and most importantly constitutional, and it should not be considered likely. People want stuff nowadays to happen fast and ask questions later. "If it doesn't work out, we will just repeal it" they say even though that mostly doesn't happen.
They're programmed. Simple critical thinking can break it though because its so obviously wrong. That's why the left's main tool is censoring and silencing.
Not sure if I agree with the diversity for both because one is education and no race should be denied this and the other is a performance sport which requires skill and physical strength. How can diversity be applied to College sport if one is physically weak or weaker by comparison?
This reminds me of the interview about redistributing their GPA. “I worked hard for my GPA! I don’t want to share it with students who didn’t work as hard as me!”
I think to be fair, when they answered to start. They all felt pressured because of the climate on campuses. It’s the “right thing to say” and they don’t ever actually think critically about it. This is a problem because if they don’t think about it they will just sit by while people push this BS
So because she has a different view she’s dumb? Have you been taught to be open minded? Honestly I challenge you to go to the mirror and say “because this woman said that she thinks talent is acquired from birth she is dumb”. Do it.
And how did those that have talent succeed? They often did not get there by talent and hard work alone. Wayne Gretzky was born in January. This gave him a huge advantage. Almost no hockey player born in December makes it into the big leagues. Bill Gates had $50,000 to buy DOS as well as other advantages that most do not have. So why are most college sports as well as professional Basketball and Football are dominated by blacks? I suspect it is not because of talent alone.
Glad to see that the students are intelligent and open-minded enough to change their mind. It also demonstrates how one-sided their upbringing has been.
Or it shows how easily they will flip when put under any kind of pressure because they don't truly care about the topic at all. Young people today are putting on a show 24/7 because they are slaves to clicks and likes and can't separate social media from reality.
@@falcon2666 wrong. You can control young people’s opinions pretty easy. I voted for Bernie in the 2016 primary. Today my politics are very far from that.
@@kevinjohnston4923 I appreciate your comments. It should be understandable to reasonable observers that young people who grow up in the midst of widespread, nonstop brainwashing (from the news, social media, movies, music, etc.) will be affected by it. But this video shows what can happen when the truth is presented, not in a Holier Than Thou manner, but respectfully-and creatively. Hating (however justified it may feel) only causes hating.
If black people already dominates most sports how can it be called diversity if they can also be called oppressed? Do they even know how much sports players can earn a year with just a contract.. millionsssss
One of my talking points when people talk about how oppressed and racist the western world are. You freaking have people like Obama, Lebron, JayZ, etc..
"I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character." - Martin Luther King Jr
@@guydedje6378 - Well, the population thinks those two (and more criminals) have contributed more significantly to society than anything MLK could have done. The result of lack of instilling significant education and promoting ‘feelings’ over facts.
I think it's great to bring a little pride and achievement to your family, but you want to make sure it's because you achieved it yourself and not because of what you look like.
This is probably the most effective thing you could do with these questions it’s not so embarrassing for them you just gently bring to light the contradictions
![Blox Fruits Dragon Rework Update [Full Stream]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EqDAp8udhm0/mqdefault.jpg)
"Should we have diversity on sports teams?"
"No, we want to win."
Sums it up perfectly
How about doctors? Should people get into medical school based on skill, or based on a quota? Imagine going to a neurologist who has no clue what she's doing. This was very disappointing for me. They should have the most challenging requirements of all.
"Should we have diversity in our medical schools?" "No, we want to live"
Terrible comparison
It’s such a bad comparison. In most workplaces making the workforce more diverse doesn’t stop them from winning. That only happens at the top level.
@@phantom8699 The point is that we all know full well that if you're hiring on diversity, you're going to get worse people. Because if you wouldn't have hired the person on skill alone, they are by definition worse than the person who would have been hired on skill alone.
A medical professor once said “I’m holding everyone to the same standard and won’t hesitate to fail you, because one day I’ll be old and I don’t want my life support device to be designed or operated by someone who got the job to fill a quota.”
I also don't want the doctor that got "C" on the final exams
Well said.
Great quote! Same with airplane pilots. And air traffic controllers.
Saying the same today would result in that professor being fired and replaced by an AA hire.
@@IdahoRanchGirl All of which hire based on DEI quotas.
Football: Merit is key to success.
Brain surgery: The most marginalized only need apply.
some years ago I watched a video of a group of women who wanted to be firefighters. the women on the video couldn't even lift the firehose, and the whole thing looked like the 3 stooges. I'd show these kids that video and ask them if their house was on fire, would they want those women to go and put out the fire, or would they prefer a group of men who can get the job done regardless of what color they are.
lmao
😂😂😂
@@Jerseybytes2 as a Counterpoint I remember the story of Sandy Riddell. She decided she wanted to be a firefighter, but was told that no woman could pass the physical test necessary to qualify for the training. Learning what was required, she left and trained with weights for a year and reapplied. Not only did she pass the physical test but she set the record for many of the events.
@@markjordan348 Retired firefighter here. There are women who can perform firefighting tasks quite well. There are also many who cannot.
Twenty odd years ago, we had a woman who was hired only because the city was lawsuit-shy if they didn't hire her. Years later, one of the guys who gave her the agility test told me that they were ordered to make sure she passed. She was 5'3", about 100 lbs and was totally incapable of starting a chainsaw, raising a ladder, pulling charged lines, holding any nozzle over an inch-and-a-half size, lifting a stretcher, swinging an axe with any effect, was terrified of heights, etc; etc;
She was also a fanatical, man-hating feminist who threatened lawsuits any time an attempt was made to hold her accountable for her shortcomings. She expected the department and the men around her to make special accommodations for her inabilities. It was an impossible situation.
She eventually just failed to show up for her shift one day, and filed a frivolous lawsuit against the city, the department, and even individuals (not me, oddly. She hated me). The city offered a cash settlement of about 1/20th of what she filed for. She took it and ran.
She was employed for about 4 years. It was wrong that she was hired, wrong that she lasted as long as she did because the city was afraid to get rid of her, and wrong that she saw a dime in the end.
Sorry for the long rant, but it's been a sore spot with me for years. She was worse than useless and simply horrible on every level.
The amazing part is their total conviction for both. They just go full throttle on whatever they’re told to think
Now you're getting it
The scary part is they have no idea what the end result would look like.
@@robertstewart1262we’re about to find out 😉
Welcome to America! Once they’re out of school the media will tell them what to think!
@@joetruth7823 WDYM Once they're out of school? It's way before then
College professor here. The reality is that conversations like these may be the very first time anyone on campus has engaged these students in a simple critical thinking exercise about their beliefs. That illustrates how politically monolithic campuses are these days. Campuses are often ideological bubbles surrounded by reality.
Colleges sure have changed in the last 20 years. When I went I boycotted a class because the black professor was having a known black bigot as a guest in his class. I said I wouldn’t be there and I struck to it. The next class no hard feelings. Things have obviously worsened.
And as a 20 year old college student I agree with you here. I know of examples of this in my own college (in Eastern Connecticut) since most students don't get questioned by professors about their political beliefs since they normally agree with each other. Instead they simply accept those beliefs (which are mainly far-left ideas politically). So as you said, many colleges become ideological bubbles as a result.
But I also have to say I sometimes spend time thinking why so many in my generation act this way (refusing to have discussions about political beliefs when I'm the only one who seems to be involved in it).
Would you like your heart/brain surgeon to be a "diversity hire" (lower scores, but got in because of skin color or the like)?...... Wait you don't, shocker
Sad thing is 33 years ago as a Senior in High school we regularly had to use critical thinking in class discussions...flash forward to 2015 and I'm in my 3rd year of University I was amazed when kids in an Upper Division History class had to have Critical Thinking explained to them...at that time my own son was 15 and he knew what Critical Thinking was and why it needed to be applied in writing an essay for example...his teachers always complimented me on teaching him Critical thinking at an early age and I always blew their minds by telling them that we taught him how to think critically while he was in Elementary school...
@@burnoutn9 Yay for you!!!!!
No to Critical Race Theory
Yes to Critical Thinking Skills!!!!!
This is priceless. They don’t even realize their hypocrisy until pointed out.
They do but don't care
@@spardaprowess3277 No, they don't. They think about one issue and give the politically correct answer for that one issue. Then on to the next issue. They never make a comparative analysis in their minds between the answers they've given until confronted with the opposing answers to, what are basically, the same circumstances.
*idiocy
@Kevin Udly - So true. But to the credit of the students in this video, they were able to reprocess their belief in a flawed ideology, when faced with a reason to apply critical thought.
That was unexpected, and a very nice surprise.
Maybe some of them dont realize their hypocrisy but I feel like most didnt understand what diversity quotas meant
This reporter just taught them more than college will ever teach them.
No she didn't, In their insane world they are probably all asking themselves.....why was that racist asking weird questions.
yet how do i feel dumber watching them be stupid
She caused them to use part of their brain 😋
Sad!
@@rkrk-xu4ud
Not for long, though.
This is prime example of children being told what to think and not how to think!
children indeed
Incredibly naive.
Which part of the video showed thinking?
"If we recruited based on diversity we'd probably be worse". Best quote here, and sums up the hypocrisy perfectly.
To me, the best quote is: "I didn't think about it". That's the problem.
Still these guys do not understand what they just said. They turned around 180° within a couple of seconds and don’t even realise it.
This is our future generation…..
If only the school systems were equal, there might be more diversity on college campuses. I'd love to see a program were the kids from a "good" school get bussed to a "bad" school and the kids from the "bad" school get to go to the "good" one, just to see if it makes a difference and if so, by how much.
It’s such a bad comparison
The funny thing is that they've ginned up some pseudo studies to claim that more diverse work places outperform others. Of course they didn't compare to ones that focus on meritocracy, nor did they control for workplaces that already respond quickly to the marketplace (including the current wave of "diversity" requirements). So they can now claim that diversity in colleges and workplaces equals better performance, and no one calls out the poor studies for fear of being labeled "racist".
Liberal logic:
Quotas that benefit minorities: Diversity is our strength.
Quotas that don't benefit minorities: It should be based on their talents and skill.
Seems like Liberals treat people differently depending on the color of their skin.
Exactly. This is the kind of ass-backwards logic that liberals use. Unfortunately, these college kids are a product of liberal professors and what they read on social media. They don't know why they believe something.....they just believe it. Hopefully when they get older and out in the workplace, they realize that diversity quotas don't make sense.
@@jayhawk328 Once they don't get hired for a position they're qualified for because the company has to meet a quota, it will really open their eyes!
They are constructing a trap for themselves based on virtue. People are not stupid and will exploit the rules of the game to get ahead. Every structure that holds our society together will be attacked under this idea. Post modernist ideology will seek to replace every structure.
They are creating standards to equalize rights based on groups rather than a standard for all based on merit through talent and hard work individually. How can anyone not see that this is the opposite of inclusive on a broad scale? It is racist. Making decisions based on group identity has lead to millions of deaths when it goes too far.
There is potential in all cultures and backgrounds so their argument that one groups ability to prosper is oppressing another groups ability and the solution is equal outcomes is pure bullshit. Addressing the roadblocks for equality of opportunity is where they should be focused.
These professors know this, their goal is not equality at all in my opinion. They know the history and believe they are smart enough to revisit ideologies that have failed many times. They are doing it for power, they wish to mold society because they are arrogant.
The enemy is people who push these agenda's. They are playing games with our future as if it is their decision to make. Consider these people in the same way you might view the early supporters of the National socialist party in Germany during the early 30's or Mao supporters during his rise. They need to be stopped. If they are allowed to continue, this could lead to another very dark time in our history. If people could have stopped Stalin or Hitler, should they have done it? Look at all the red flags, they are there.
Citizens need to take away power from the media, reform the higher learning institutions and fire radical teachers and watch your government, they are creatures of opportunity who love power more than their country.
Asian kid- "we should pick students on diversity"
" If we picked the team based on diversity we would be losing"
🤦♂️
These students are seriously lacking in the self awareness department.
Most students are
what this segment points out is how easy lies fall apart,and how just a nice and simple conversation completely melted away their strong pro diversity feelings, that's why they have to censor and sub-humanize the opposition, cause once the truth clicks in, its there to stay
*I disagree with everyone except the girl in the orange top. She is a genius.*
They sure are and they have that Messiah Complex that plagues so many young people.
You have to be taught to be that stupid. And they are.
I applaud them for being able to reflect quickly and change their stance while on camera instead of doubling down and getting angry
Your bar is set awfully low when all they have to do is not have a pathetic and threatening melt-down to be 'applauded'.. These people don't actually have opinions, they merely go along with whoever is nearby at the moment.
"Why don't you want quotas in sport?"
"Because we want to win."
same with math, physics, engineering, medicine, law, business.......we only want the BEST
Exactly….and they just shot down their own basis for wanting quotas.
@Gooodzz you don’t get into a college field by just being “athletic.” There is a lot more to it than that.
@Gooodzz I was one of those kids. Poor family, small rural town. Yet I have done so many things in my life peoples' jaws drop when they hear it all. I had an opportunity to go to Harvard on a full ride, could have been or done anything I wanted, if i wanted it bad enough. Top student everywhere i went. It's not a matter of money so much as it is other factors.
@Gooodzz your lousy excuses are what the demographic you bleed for live by. Total b.s. If you want it bad enough, you work for it. Earn it! My grandparents came over from Ireland in the 1920s with nothing. Felt the anti-Irish waves, yet worked hard and succeeded. Get real, kid!!!
When you've been told that the bigotry of low expectations is commendably compassionate.
Well spoken
Time and time again.
Exactamundo
@Crowder Nf good why should some scammer make money of him.
*_Isaiah 55.6 Seek the Lord while He may be found, Call upon Him while He is near. 7 Let the wicked forsake his way, And the unrighteous man his thoughts; Let him return to the Lord, And He will have mercy on him; And to our God, For He will abundantly pardon._*
_Jesus Christ loves you. Only Jesus Christ saves. Repent and be saved. God bless you, and the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ, and the love of God, and the communion of the Holy Spirit be with you and your family._
-------
Here's an idea: remove all the identifying info from applications. Assign every applicant a number. Then, judge the applicants by their merits. That sounds like the most fair to me.
@@orevel exactly
@@orevel You don't start at the university level, though. If a student, no matter their race, isn't prepared then you set them up for failure. Not only that, but for any students of another race or gender it can be harmful by reinforcing negative stereotypes they've learned. The "I guess my uncle was right, Mexicans just aren't as smart as us" kind of backwards thinking.
I'm all about need based scholarships so that students can be set up for success, but if you can't make it in by the same standards as everyone else then it's a waste.
We aren't going to lower the acceptable standards for medical treatment, engineering, etc. so why should we start anyone down that path that is set up to fail? College entrance requirements exist for a reason. Instead of waiving requirements, let's help kids of all backgrounds get a good education starting in kindergarten, not with university level courses.
My sister lives in NYC and she overheard a girl that was really upset on the subway. She'd be accepted into a prestigious university that she wasn't prepared for. She was trying to catch up but other students were way ahead because her high school didn't offer the kind of prep needed, and she was going to have to drop out. She was miserable, but someone out there is probably patting themself on the back for "helping" her.
@@orevel youre talking about class and race as if they are the same thing
@@orevel If you have a job right now, but your boss needs to fire one person and hire someone who is the opposite race as you are but is obviously not as skilled as you are in your specific field to meet a diversity quota, and you weren’t even sure if you could find another job, would you be willing to give up your job to this person?
After all, don’t forget, it’s not nice to not be inclusive.
@@Lustie You're setting up a hypothetical that is obviously rigged to have people side with your argument.
First, your boss is not allowed to fire someone because they are not the right race. That would in fact open them up to a racial discrimination lawsuit.
Second, in your example you say that the "opposite race" individual is "obviously not as skilled as you are" , how would you determine that? Just an unfounded accusation meant to bias your hypothetical.
Third diversity quotas don't exist the way they're being represented here. Affirmative action regulations provide that goals serve as "targets reasonably attainable by means of applying every good faith effort to make all aspects of the entire affirmative action program work" and that goals "may not be rigid and inflexible quotas, which must be met." Quotas can only be imposed by judicial order to correct a pattern of blatant discrimination.
Under the Civil Rights Act, you cannot base a hiring decision, in whole or in part, on a person's race/gender. Affirmative action is intended to ensure that employers hire the most qualified people, including members of groups that previously have been subject to unlawful discrimination.
You created a loaded hypothetical that made way to many unfounded assumptions.
Kudos to the presenter for NOT putting the students on the defensive and possibly getting them to think. People beyond college would rarely consider changing their minds.
"Skill-based" is the correct answer across the board - whether in academics or in sports. I've been saying this for years - no names, race or gender should appear on a college application - it should have only the potential student's SSN on it. Who did the best? Who outperformed the other applicants? THAT'S who should be admitted. The student's other "qualifiers" are not relevant. If you don't want to use SSN, assign the applicant a random number. This is NOT HARD, people!
Hey there buster! You're making too much sense here! Better knock that off!
@@twg_twiggy I get accused of that frequently!
Underrated comment
Would love to see what the enrolled class would look like.
You cannot say skill based due to the fact that we are not talking about skill and more so opportunity. If a student wasn’t introduced to things because of the environment they grew up in placed them in a school district that was inferior to others around the country. And as we know this is all due to your financial status. And that goes to show that they want you for abilities on the field but don’t care otherwise. It is a system designed for some to prosper and others to fail and until people are ready to admit these truths all their arguments are void and pointless.
Diversity quotas are racist. You are choosing who to hire based on skin color.
100%
So true
Solving racism with even more racism, rather than just doing the obvious and logical thing.
Its not racist if it diminishes and humiliates white people in their countries
1. First plan on the Georgia Guidestones is for 93% of all people to be disappeared. (That includes blacks, whites, Mexicans, Christians...and Democrats aren't safe either.)
2. True width of Washington Monument is 666 inches wide on each of its 4 sides.
3. Former elite banker R-onald Ber-nard says most billionaires are Luciferians (Satanic).
All atheist nations end up in poverty and dictatorship, unless helped by Christians.
Jesus said, and you shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free.
Campus reform is a genius for applying this to sports. “Talent is talent” is what one said but not when it comes to academics very different.
This is an old argument from around 2014.
Same is said "if cops are racist and target blacks, then we need to address the gender arrest gap and either arrest more women or let 40% of men arrested go free"
Yup
@@fallingfloor6924 well they do now...
Plus Affirmative action also goes against what MLK preached in his "I have a dream" speech.... "A man being judged not by the color of his skin, but by the content of his character. "
Funny thing happens when you poll the students on Socialism as well. You ask them if they agree with Socialism and equity. Many of them are all about the idea, until you ask them if they would be willing to give up some of their GPA to give it to students who have not performed as well. Suddenly they get upset because you are suggesting removing something they have earned and giving it to someone else. The funny thing about Socialism, is it’s always a good idea to the people who may be receiving, and a good idea when you’re taking OTHER peoples money to give to people we don’t have as much. They always seem to suddenly change their tune, when it’s THEIR money you’re talking about taking.
I'm actually surprised that the students didnt try to make excuses as to why one quota is bad and the other is good.
They finally learned something on campus.
and it didn't even costs them the tens of thousands of dollars in tuition.
And not from a liberal professor. No surprise here.
Such a great example…merit doesn’t count ….. except when it really matters … like football. Sigh… The answers universally with this generation “I didn’t know that or I didn’t think about it.” Our future is being indoctrinated.
Thank you for what you’re doing!
@Crowder Nf good for Trump
yes, because merit doesn't matter when designing a bridge that needs to stand for half a century or more.
Rational thought wins out. That’s why leftists avoid debates.
The left will always avoid explaining how war is peace
Exactly. If you're having a major, life or death surgery, do you want the best surgeon or be diverse correct?
That's why they are always trying to force you to shut down debates also.
@Anglosaurus Rex Many people of all backgrounds come to America to escape socialistic rule. Whites are already a minority. I don't think it's a big deal. If the concept is good then ALL people will like it.
The lefties avoid debares because they are never challenged. The media and Academia only challenge the ideals, opinions and thoughts of those they oppose. Since a left wing lunatic never uses truth, facts, reason or any other logical means to debate their viewpoints they never develop any skills to intelligently discuss or debate most topics. Feelings and emotions are they only criteria they seem to employ which means lefties either abandon a debate or it devolves into a profanity strewn personnel attack on the individual using logic and reason.
Just wait until a “quota” hurts them (job promotion, school acceptance, …. Etc)
Exactly. It seems the black community is under represented at this school. How many of those white kids would give up their place?
they are just regurgitating the socialistic viewpoints drilled into their unsuspecting brains from their communist teachers. One Campus Reform asked whether money should be taken from "richer" people and given to poorer people who won't work, they all said YES. but when that same logic was applied to their test results, ON NO! We can't be taking from MY grades, because I worked hard for it, while others just partied...
@@mchrysogelos7623 I love these interviews. When these students get hit with the facts they look like a dear in the headlights.
@@cuckingfunt9353 That's the best way to do it, letting themselves realize it's not really logical (Perfect execution). But if you insult them, call them stupid and things like that, they won't change their views. Also when you try hardly to prove them wrong, you often get the same results.
It's already happening and they don't like it. In 5 years time all of this will be upended when they realize their quality of life has diminished due to this nonsense.
It’s amazing how proudly we declare the lofty ideas and restrictions we place on others and how quickly we reject the application of the same ideas and restrictions when they apply to us once self interest becomes involved. This is one of the very foundations of true inequality
Reporter is a genius for applying those diversity tactics to the O line. Yt channels like this are the true children of Jon Stewart and The Onion.
I loved both growing up so you might be onto sometime ☺️
The Onion??? WTF you talking about, the Onion is NOT a liberal mouthpiece, the Onion if anything shines a light on how stupid Liberals are.
Jon Stewart on the other hand is a Liberal Mouthpiece, the guy is worth like 100 million dollars yet pretends to speak for the working man. "Trump Bad, Biden Good", I used to love "The Daily Show" but then it became a mouthpiece for the Democrats.
People have been saying this for over 50 years and it was still met with the same resistance and double standard
its so sad to see how much students are invested in physicality, and so little in learning witch is way more important ,sports is a past time, you want the best learners so you get the most skilled workers ,and those who do not cut the mustard are not wasting time learning stuff that more and better skilled people will shade them out in the market place, its just an ego thing, you can have a totally cool and very rich life without being educated ,you can be dumb and rich or super smart and poor, and while its important that we have educated people ,its totally unimportant to have everyone educated,,leave it to the ones who are good at it,,and you go open a plumbing supply or something
@@tbirum They said, the "children" of the two. You are saying the same thing. One are the leftists that can't see their hypocrisy/stupidity and one is the conservative showing them that.
"We want to win no matter what you are... It should be based off talent." Hey Snowflakes, BUSINESSES WANT TO WIN TOO!!!
Exactly.... Diversity hired brain surgeon is like totallyyyy cool, because like racism
I guess being knowledgeable in something academically isn’t a skill regardless of race. Quotas aren’t fair on people lower on the color chart who actually earned their spot
Not to mention that workers want qualified co-workers, customers want qualified personnel and so on and so forth. Saying that for those brainwashed into thinking that a company "winning" must be pillaging and plundering others, since sinful people do sinful things means we should do away with freedom ( free markets etc. ) .
@Tom Brady you missed his point buy a country mile. He is being sarcastic, he's basicly saying a person getting a highly skilled job just because they are black and not because they are the best person for the job is a very stupid way to hire.
@Tom Brady I can't name a minority doctor but I can name a diversity quota hired as POTUS back in 2008. By the way, how's that still working out for America?
"Sports is different than college." So, a game should be based on talent, but real life should be based on "fairness."
It’s kinesthetic diversity Vs neurological diversity, man. Lol.
That’s actually a good argument. Just like taking steroids should get you banned from a competition, but being stupid doesn’t mean you should die.
Colleges are great because of how diverse they are. Environments that have lots of differing opinions and perspectives and background are way better learning environments than colleges where every student is a wealthy smart kid.
These colleges are prestigious because of their diversity so if you did away with that diversity no one would want to go to them. If you ask a prospective student if they’d rather go to a school where everyone is similar or one that is diverse everyone is gonna choose the diverse one because why else would you be going to college. It’s the same reason that colleges brag about their demographics because they want people from all backgrounds coming to their school.
You’re looking at it from such two dimensional lens and you’re not thinking about the actual application and reasoning for this diversity in these environments. Also they’re not letting in random students. It’s not like “oh let’s just let in this 2.0 gpa kid because he’s black and screw over this 4.0 white kid” they’re choosing between two qualified applicants and one QUALIFIED applicant might get the edge because they come from a more interesting background. Would you rather let in a 4.2 gpa rich white kid, in a school of all 4.2 rich white kids, or would you let in a 4.0 gpa Latino kid?
I really appreciate that the kids were willing to be open minded and reconsider their positions when confronted with a conflicting position. Many adults I know much older than them are fundamentally unable to do the same thing
I think it just opened the door to how they really thought in the first place.
It's kinda sad that all these kids default to virtue signaling and regurgitating an answer before thinking about it. That one girl in the orange flip-flopped HARD and didn't bat an eye.
*One cannot argue with perfect symmetry.*
She didn't even seem to realize that she'd completely changed her mind. Severe case of lack of self-awareness.
🎯
@@1nvisible1 Well said.
I didn't hear a word she said
"Everyone should have an equal part." If you want equality, you'd eliminate the quotas.
It’s not about equality, for them.
It’s about equity.
That’s why the oppressed victim mentality is running rampant.
Because they believe the more One is able to check the boxes of the qualifications, in what they perceive as oppression - the more opportunities they feel they are entitled to.
If it was about equality - it wouldn’t matter, what boxes they check; everyone has the same opportunity, to earn their way into whatever field they desire pursuing.
"I didn't really think about diversity". That's the problem, these students don't think, they are brainwashed.
well, at least l learned to question authority when l moved over from China to here. The long march described in American textbook is quite different from ccp textbook.
They are brain dead
No, they are just afraid to think and be honest.
It looks like they’re afraid to ask these questions or think this way. Once ‘given permission’ by the interviewer they open up and stop towing the company line. That is indoctrination.
They're no longer students, but merely puppets.
Students are taught to be producitve and informed citizens (at least by design)
What we have are brow-beaten cowards who piss themselves at the tought of calling out someone for their lack of effort , lack of skill/ability, or violent and aggressive behaviors.
All because someone might call them a wayyysis.
A nation of blanket holding thumbsuckers.
WOW!!!! It’s amazing what happens when people actually start to think!
Its like they don't teach critical thinking anymore.... They teach agendas and feelings.
1. First plan on the Georgia Guidestones is for 93% of all people to be disappeared. (That includes blacks, whites, Mexicans, Christians...and Democrats aren't safe either.)
2. True width of Washington Monument is 666 inches wide on each of its 4 sides.
3. Former elite banker R-onald Ber-nard says most billionaires are Luciferians (Satanic).
All atheist nations end up in poverty and dictatorship, unless helped by Christians.
Jesus said, and you shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free.
Yeah, that's true for far too many people in my generation.
They've actually changed the meaning of critical thinking for college students. Now they are teaching them NOT to trust their logic and ability to form conclusions, to be counterintuitive, basically, to accept the opinions of "experts." They've completely flipped the meaning.
That is exactly how it is.
“I hadn’t really thought about it”
That about sums up all of those moronic policies.
Exactly. The left doesn't think. Ever. They just do whatever their masters tell them.
It’s worse than that. They’ve been led to believe that they have thought about it.
Applies to virtue signaling vaccine mandates that's ruining businesses
"I didn't think about it".... most telling response from the students.
talent , talent is talent , nearly choked i was laughing so much , have any of these children ever sat down and had a thought of their own . well done to the young lady interviewer.
"I guess I didn't think about it." That's the problem with people, they don't think. Herd mentality.
They don't think, they blindly follow what the liberal media spoon feeds them.
@@awy1977 Yes they do. And I also suspect there is a conspiracy to push this trend at colleges/university's. How do they do that? I was on campus at age 35 and saw some disgusting liberal professors. Who give them their marching orders? CIA?
Or it shows that we don't do a good job of convincing them. This is a great argument and i will use it with my family to see if it sways them.
@White Knight or tell you to stop watching FOX News.
Yes, but I'd wager you could/should say this about *literally everyone/every citizen,* save for people who have careers involving these issues (politicians, news outlets,...). Most US citizens haven't thoroughly researched/devised their own opinions on all, or even many political issues. That takes serious work/effort.
When you've never worked or payed a bill in your life.
Or run a business!
Lol ding ding ding
It’s "paid".
@@kattengat2 it's ma'am
@Crowder Nf good for Trump,why should somebody get rich off his name?
Students support crackdown on fossil fuel because of “existential threat” until they’re informed it means canceling their Spring Break trip to Cancun.
They're on board with canceling your spring break but not theirs.
Little do they realize all the internet they use are run on cell towers. Which are run by fossil fuel.... so......... until they stop posting videos/ watching videos / instant messaging.... I will continue to travel 🤣
They support a crackdown on fossil fuel because they don't spend even 1 minute learning about how the alternatives (sans nuclear) takes more energy to produce than the energy it gives out. To say nothing of how solar panels, wind turbines and batteries cannot be recycled and only have a 10-25 year life cycle. They are quite literally campaigning for less efficient and therefore more expensive energy that will impoverish the world.
@@DeusExDraconian Are you kidding me? Almost everything you just said is flat out incorrect.
Nuclear energy does not “take more energy to produce than the energy it gives out”. This is such an utterly moronic statement that I don’t even need a source. Pay attention to thermodynamics in chemistry next class.
You are (partially) correct about the lifespan of the things you listed, but you say that as if it’s somehow aiding an argument for fossil fuels when the fossil fuel industry damages entire landscapes, pollutes water supplies, and most importantly, is the primary culprit behind excessive greenhouse gas emissions in the past few centuries. Your argument is akin to saying “Why should I stop smoking if I’m going to breathe in the same air as all the other smokers in the world?” The difference is incomparable.
Less efficient does not mean more expensive, ESPECIALLY in the energy sector. But you don’t seem to have any conception of what either of these mean when it comes to energy. Fossil fuels are BY FAR the least efficient source of energy at our disposal. The majority of the energy from the fuels we burn is lost as radiant heat. The reason why we use it is because it’s cheap and readily available. Economics. Duh.
Solar is more efficient and cheaper than fossil fuels: news.energysage.com/solar-energy-vs-fossil-fuels/
Nuclear is FAR more efficient and, while expensive to start up, infinitely cheaper to run than fossil fuel plants: www.energy.gov/ne/articles/nuclear-power-most-reliable-energy-source-and-its-not-even-close
@@desuvult15
Re-read what he wrote. Sans means, not including. You have a lot of gross conceptual errors.
Fossil fuels are more or less clean. The water, the air, the environment has never been more clean.
Nuclear is not efficient but the fuel is basically free.
Nat Gas plants run 70% efficient
Nuclear is more expensive than Nat Gas with current NG prices.
Solar panels will run 98% efficient, but they only work where you have, wait for it, wait..sunshine.
Coal and nuclear are about 30% with nuclear fuel being basically free. You can get get up to 45% efficient coal plants with very high pressure/temp cycles.
Wind takes power from a "free" source, just like the solar.
Again, not scalable.
Hydro same thing.
The impact of Fossil fuels to our environment when weighed with the benefit is small.
The part that I’m most impressed by is how they quickly understood their flawed thinking and adjusted it. Good for them for being open minded and actually questioning the things they’ve been told to think.
“I didn’t think about…”
Exactly. Thinking isn’t taught in this generation.
Agreed. They're taught what to think (indoctrination) rather than how to think (logic/reason).
@Crashinglikeamouse
Thinking is “racist.”
They’re told what to think, and if they voice disagreement, they’re a nazi racist sexist homophobe (or some other name that equals evil person
@@keithwilson6060 This. Mah favorite!
I somewhat also blame their parents for not teaching them... my parents aren't perfect, but they taught me a little, plus the grace of God was enough to keep me from becoming like these....
Everything should be based on ability and talent. Period. What an eye opener for these clueless students.
Too bad it won't change anything they do, think or say though. They'll continue doing all the same things.
Check out the other videos on this channel, the question now is why send kids to college at all, the stupidity is everywhere.
Clueless students raised by clueless parents.
Quotas: “It’s an absolute necessity”
“I know they’re unconstitutional”
💁
That’s the left motto
that made me sooo mad
She is clearly going to go far based off her skills.
@@Andrew_NJ Yeah her 2 skills will carry her pretty far thanks to simps
@@Veros245 When someone's skills are formed naturally they have to be admired.
These videos always blown my mind on how no ones takes a second to actually think before they answer
The moment when sailor boy mentally slapped himself across the face with reality is needed across all campuses
Is he a village person?
across da while usa!!!! wake up ppl!!!!!! lmfao!!!! lets go brandon!!!!
Sailor boy lmfao. I was wondering wtf was up with his hat
Gilligan.....?
@@HubertofLiege He's a village people person.
That was masterfully crafted, and not to throw it in their face either. It logically and reasonably proved their stances wrong, and allowed them to figure it out on their own (which is ridiculous that you’d have to explain it in such detail for college students). Good content as always
This piece is a perfect example of keeping your mind open to other perspectives and comparisons. It reveals these kids aren’t dumb. They are being deceived with a one view liberal agenda.
For the most part I believe we should approach these kids differently than the way we typically treat them.
Give them something that is so obvious and repackage it into something they can relate to.
It’s going to take some very creative people to change the course of their thought driven by the lefts agenda.
An really smart person 🤷♀️ said “There’s more than one way to skin a cat”.
Cliche, yes, but , cliches are cliches for a reason.
This exposes a hint of racism in the guise of equality.
It stuns me how people can be so blatantly hypocritical and have no problem with it
SEC football fans
To be fair, they were not really defending their previous points. They acknowledge that they needed to look beyond just the diversity when deciding
Certainly doesn't speak well of their intellectual ability.
its all antiwhiteism
minorities have made it so whenever white people are better at someting its only because of racism but any other groupit is basically acceptable
@@JamesYeangit doesn’t matter give them a ballot and they’ll still vote like morons the fact that they had to be told this lmao
Excellent way of making people truly understand what DEI actually means. Most people don't understand an issue, they just rely on media sound bites on how you should react. Many can't or won't explain why they stand for what they stand for because they haven't taken the time to try to understand the topic until someone comes along to give them context. Being against DEI doesn't make you racist, being a racist makes you racist because you are incapable of making up your own mind based on facts.
So they think if a kid's talent is throwing a ball then it should be about who is best but if someone's talent is their mind, their studies and striving for excellence in the classroom it's not about who is best anymore. Unbelievable.
well said
The nice thing about football is that there's a clear winner and loser, so it's hard to argue about "well we're actually better because" if you lost on the field. It's interesting how much more logical they all were when it came to that.
I LOVE these interviews!! These kids just go along with Wokeness until they’re actually confronted with the REALITY of “diversity”!!
Wait until they lose a job because of it!
@@stoneagearcher3477 Or housing if they fall short at some point, or food if they get hungry, or long term medical care, or college etc. etc. Illegals and minorities get first pick.
@@DinDooIt it’s happening now! Need to be looked at for a medical issues? We will see you in three months.
Im seriously concerned about the future of this country. The future is now, thats why we are going to hell very quickly.
@@jron3747 I was just about to say the same thing. Sadly these kids thought about it for 1/2 a second and I'm sure when right back to their indoctrinated way of life.
“Maybe we should be admitting kids to colleges based off skills and scores” LOL let’s go Brandon.
I know huh. I interview people for Cyber Jobs often....I dont even really listen to anything other than their answers to my questions. Those with skills are hired.....I dont even look at the schools because to me its a joke. Could be someone from MIT or a community college.....I look at their certifications and ask question based on those as well
@@vincentgarcia9784 It's too bad because a few people actually did go to colleges where critical thinking is encouraged. I was fortunate enough to be one of those people. But I understand why my degrees aren't of much value these days.
@@TheSBleeder I guess that if your skills are up to the task, you should be fine.
Celebs should be hiring women guards instead of men :)
SAT's way ahead of you granting people points for being black, lol
I had to watch this twice because the first pass I was laughing too hard to hear most of it L O L O L O L O L
THERE WERE SO MANY LIGHTS GOING ON IN THEIR HEADS!!!
Excellent. Work. 💯
I really like how you aren’t out there just looking for a “gotcha” moment or trying to make people feel stupid. You make them critically think and they naturally change their mind. Love this. Need more of it.
thanks for wording that out. i felt it too
If people are acting stupid or holding stupid beliefs they should be made to feel stupid. Shame is a powerful motivator.
@Verissimus probably true for some people. But not the snow flakes. You will never get through to them like that.
@@verissimus3008 How many people do you think have changed their minds about anything at all because someone called them stupid?
Yes. That’s a must. Always refrain from insulting political morons. Never point out their moronhood directly. If you do that, they will just dig into their flawed beliefs further out of spite. You must show them the undeniable error of their ways gracefully in order to change their views and help them.
These kids are adorable, like talking to a bunch of children. “Oh no, sports teams should be the best, most skilled people but of course that same logic shouldn’t be applied to anything else” 🙄
Because sports and real life are different. In real life, hard work is more important. In sports, talent does rule.
@@bluehotdog2610 Wouldn't the most "hard working" people have the highest scores, highest grades, and most proficient SKILLS? How does anything you said refute the original comment that society should be structured based on ABILITY? You are confused.
Thankfully they changed their minds 😃
@@bluehotdog2610 How is it any different? It is about ability. When you need a cardiologist, do you want a diversity hire or do you want the best one available? Merit based is going to get efficiency and that is far more important, especially when your life is on the line.
You have to realize they are on a college campus the home of some of the stupidest people in the world.
It blows my mind how the average American actually “doesn’t think”.
These are supposedly above average Americans. The best, the brightest the most melanin-enhanced.
Bingo!
Well they do waste time on their first year on the basics before specializing in their actual field. If the average american was intelligent the world would be totally fck.
@Mr Best Policy correction, the entire world.
This is exactly why the founding fathers went for a Representative Republic instead of Straight Democracy. I don't think they understood the level of corruption that would creep in, but would 6 branches of checks and balances really been less corruptible?
Love this! You are one of the only channels ive watched that actually opens up the minds of those you interview!
I don’t think these kids are leftists. I think they are just I agree with the wind people
Those that want to enact social programs are almost always leftists.
unfortunately most kids are like this
They are simply parroting the cognitive dissonance of their "academic" indoctrinators
VERY WELL PUT.
Yap they are just plain stupid 😎....but Stupid synonyms=Leftist.So ....no comments.
I’m so proud of them ;_; they ALL SAID “I hadn’t really thought about it”.
But now that they did, they changed their stance, which is an important skill to develop!!!
It also means they don't think about what they say.
@@Vincrand "democracy is for the ppl by the ppl, the problem is that ppl are retarded" i find myself more and more conflicted by this statement. :D
@@Vincrand Baby steps at this point.
Except the non stop societal indoctrination will pull them back in. This lesson will have been forgotten soon after the interview.
@@workhorse7134 Indeed.
I am actually happy about this video. They didn’t bullshit their way out of the double standard. Just just “hadn’t thought about it before”. Which means all we have to do is get people to think in a simple, straight-forward manner. That’s a win 👍
Unfortunately these days you wouldn't necessarily get responses like this when interviewing Ivy League colleges.
I think the way she went about it was key. 0 aggression, 0 condescension, no snark: just straight to the point.
What a shame that these college students couldn't do a little bit of critical thinking and figure this out on their own. This is the reason Rush Limbaugh used to refer to them as "young skulls full of mush."
College is supposed to improve critical thinking. ✌️
The bigger question then becomes how did these students get to their age without ever having considered this before? Could it be there's extreme bias in the media and politics to specifically prevent people asking these questions and considering these issues?
Good for these kids having the intelligence and maturity to keep an open mind and change an opinion when confronted with logic and facts
no. bad for these kids. they do not have open minds. they are simply easy to control. why did they not research this issue in the first place. censorship maybe.
ask anyone of those kids if they would give up their spot on campus for a minority? None of them would!!!
That would have been a great question to add!
That's such an important point. They always say everyone else should make changes, but not them.
Isn’t that what Affirmative Action does?
College students discovering "common sense" for the first time. Great video.
When it comes to sport diversity is really the last fucking thing you need you want big guys who can throw the ball hit the ball run the ball smack a puck on ice etc and you want the toughest you can get for this diversity has no place in sport also Military and politics
@@kurtpunchesthings2411 and anything/everything else. ⬅️=Common sense?!
@@kurtpunchesthings2411 quotas and other forced diversity stunts have no place anywhere. If Asians were the only people who properly can do and teach math I would be all for 100% Asian math teachers.
You won't find excellence in any place where mediocrity is allowed over meritocracy.
These kids they chose to edit into the video aren't intelligent enough to answer the question effectively and fell into a trap of the agenda of the person asking the question. Ask any vaguely intelligent person those questions and they'll shred the point that the video is trying to make
@@simpudney8191 Yes, but also look at where america is at today.
This is why it's important to teach children critical thinking AT HOME.
They aren’t teaching critical thinking here tho. They are using logical fallacies and begging the question to manipulate people into believing a certain mindset lol. They used things that are closely related in idea but not correlated in a real world spectrum to force them to have a predetermined opinion. They aren’t teaching critical thinking at all lol
@@Ginger7322 Don't warp their words. Kora never said, implied, nor suggested that critical thinking was being taught in this video; they specifically stated, "at home."
@@supercala332 Saying "this is why it is important to teach critical thinking at home" definitely suggests that they were trying to have them think critically in this video lol
@@Ginger7322 No, Cooper, it doesn't. That's overthinking the words that you've read/heard, and it's the same mistake you see mainstream media make all the time, which is taking something completely out of context instead of looking at it at face value. Not everything that's said has some hidden meaning to it.
@@supercala332 that’s is not what is going on at all 😂😂😂 if someone watches a video, and responds with a comment starting with “that is why it’s important to do “blank”” then it is either implying that they are lacking that thing or the people learned that lesson in the video. So the commenter is either stating that these students lack critical thinking skills or they learned about critical thinking from participating in this video…
Thanks for circling around and discussing it properly.
The issue is deeper than that. Quotas are primarily a giant cover-up. Political leaders know that they can avoid ever having to answer for their pathetic failures in the lower socioeconomic public school systems if we just artificially force these underperforming students into colleges. They do NOT care.
That’s actually a really good point. I hadn’t thought of it from that angle.
There's no need to address inner-city school violence, or lack of attendance, poor grades etc, if you just keep shoveling students from that area into a college slot they don't deserve.
Why bother to fix those broken schools in the Ghetto, where many of the schools are run down and half functioning, "More students of X Y Z race have been to college under me than any other X Y Z representative...(Just nevermind about the schools that closed/number of people who dropped out, or flunked out entirely)."
Exactly
Which actually just leads to higher droppout rates as unqualified individuals don't get pushed through their courses. You end up with worse racial ratios after the first year.
Yes of course blame the schools, teachers, etc. instead of actually blaming the students, the parents and the society they perpetuate for not trying harder in school, for turning to selling drugs and crime. It's not the government's responsibility to raise their children better but you can blame Democrats for the welfare state and for destroying the black household and family unit, that much I will give you.
“Talent is talent is talent is talent…..”
Legend has is she is still standing there saying the same thing
Talent is talent you know
Lmao that’s what happens when u act like a smart ass
Intelligence, which is measured by IQ test is a form of talent. It's a mental talent as opposed to Wisdom.
😂😂😂😂
She said affirmative action is unconstitutional... lol
That Freudian slip “if they’re the best players fit for the *job* then they deserve the spot.”
🤣 🤣 🤣
college and work situations do not have to do with being the best. Do you actual think without discrimmination that white men would have been dominate in most things throughout history.?
@@stuartperry8141 go home bro, you’re drunk.
@@stuartperry8141how do you get to dominate others throughout history... Think about that for a day or so
@@stuartperry8141, Yes , I do . Your grammar proves my point .
Thank you for putting this out for the world to see.
Hiring based on skill verses diversity has never been more urgent than the 2020 VP selection.
LET'S GO BRANDON
Very true. I distinctly remember Biden changing from, I’ll name a woman VP, to, I’ll pick a black woman VP
And look what diversity did with heels up Harris. A unskilled I don't give a fck personality in power based off color
@@dontbeakaren6145 Get your popcorn ready when she becomes president. Her hair is going to fall right out!
@@ultrafaga1947 Even though we have a 25th amendment I highly doubt they'll remove the president even if he was on a ventilator.
Who do you want to hire for a leadership position in your company-- Talent is Talent guy or 'I meet the diversity quota' ?
This is why so many businesses are hurting, they keep pushing diversity on the hiring teams, and the less qualified person gets the job based on their gender and race.
Are you a white male? They tell you that you're privileged, but with all the Diversity and virtue signaling these days, good luck getting a job, you're the bottom of their 'must have' quotas- I suggest you start identifying as LGBTQIA++ / Gender Fluid or Something to hit a Diversity button for them!
Personally, I want the best person building the airplane I would fly in, design and build the bridge I drive my family over, design and build the 40 story elevator I go up in. I don’t want it based on a color quota. I don’t care what they look like, I just want them to be the best at their job. This sensitivity thought process is ridiculous.
Ohh--we will have the best people building and maintaining those things. But that does not mean they will be any good at it. IMO, if we can't reason and figure out reality, than we will no longer be human, but closer to a farm animal who can talk, but have no idea what it is saying,------like most college graduates today.
very well put
Building the airplane you say? Don't be silly, that's a labourers job. Diversity need not be enforced there. Similarly not to those who work at sewage treatment plants.
Diversity quotas only apply to the top jobs.
@@justinm2697 Building the airplane, designing the airplane, checking the airplane, flying the airplane, maintaining the airplane ... Everything should be based on whether you qualify for the job AND perform it accordingly. OF COURSE not all jobs require the same skills and qualifications. I would DEFINITELY want the person building the airplane to be skilled and qualified - PERIOD.
@@EarthSurferUSA Might want to do some RESEARCH if you truly believe that. I was in the USAF on January 28, 1986. READ and then research the GIGANTIC SCREWUP NASA pulled with the solid rocket boasters. Well some group got a "SET ASIDE" contract. Ask the family and crew. If you get an answer, let us know.
These kids love the buzz word and to feel noble about diversity until they actually realize implications.
Yup which is fucking sad because diversity quotas will impact their future job search, politics they end up living under, and everything else, were as none of them played sports to start with, and the outcome of a sportsball game wont make their taxes go up or have them teach their kids that they're evil for their skin color
They just said why its bad, "we wanna win, talent talent talent" So why dont they want society to win? lol "Now I think about it" lol They never thought about it at all, they are just regurgitating what they are told to think.The hypocrisy is real folks.
"May the best person win!" Whether in school, business, or sports.
@@jimmoses6617 Thanks for the comment. Note "the best person" doesn't always mean the smart or smartest person, just the best (possible, available) person in the candidate pool at a particular time and place. As such, even publicly funded schools can do well to find their best available students, even if on a more absolute basis these students aren't always (considered) the cream of the crop.
I take it you are socialist then. Because that concept only works if you believes we should all have the same standard of schooling - at least in our formative years. You can't claim to believe "may the best person win" and then say you don't have a problem with someone getting a massive head start through private schooling or tutoring as happens in a capitalist system.
This video is dumb, if you can identify discrimination that had led to white players being under-represented on the football team then we can start to talk about the necessity of quotas to correct it. Frankly the relatively low percentage of black players who are QBs compared to every other position (other than K or P) is probably the most likely example of discrimination you can find on the football field.
@@cookslooking10 Not exactly. "May the best person win" applies as long as the criteria and process in picking / selecting / rewarding the best person is the same for all participants / candidates. Whether the participants / candidates have the same exact degree of talent, skill, knowledge, training, experience, and resources, be this natured or nurtured, before the selection process begins is immaterial to the vigor of the "best person" practice.
Perhaps it might seem only fair to some that participants should have almost, if not the exact same, equal competence before the selection begins. But this is impractical. Insistence on this would mean canceling all competition (matches, games, examinations, tests etc) e.g. the Olympics. The medal winners generally not only have better trainers and coaches, but also better resources in terms of government encouragement, societal affection for the particular sport, and so on. Sometimes even geography is an advantage e.g. ski medal winners tend to come from snowy countries.
Moreover, the assumption that the better endowed (richer, more schooled etc) participants would always win, however defined, is suspect. I had grade school classmates who were quite endowed but did not become successful persons, be this in financial or achievement terms; whereas quite a few less endowed, even disadvantaged, classmates have achieved something in their life.
@@jimmoses6617 ummm... schools use grades to figure this out; really kind of the entire point is to promote the smartest, most driven and brightest among us to take more education to later achieve greater results and outcomes. This should be done from a complete "color and gender blind" objective reasoning standpoint.
Arguing that race should be a consideration for acceptance; are you saying we should also adjust grades based on skin color? When they hit job market with degree; adjust the bar for hiring? Seems like the wrong way to adjust outcomes.
@@jimmoses6617 welp we can agree to disagree.
Schools also have to evaluate potential. You cannot simply give everyone a gold star and send them packing off to Harvard because of feels. Simply not how the world works.
Shout loudly, shout proudly
LET'S GO BRANDON!!
LET'S GO BRANDON..!!!
Let's go Brandon
LETS GO BRANDON...!!!
LET’S GO BRANDON!!
LET'S GO BRANDON!!!
*What if a white person worked harder and studied more, and got better test scores. Should his place at the university be given to someone that studied less and didn't work as hard just because of his skin color?*
Great response, but that’s to easy…..😀
That already happened to Harvard with asians... Higher standards for asians and lower standards for... well, you know.
What if a colored person worked harder and studied more, and got better test scores. Should his place at the University be given to someone that studied less and didn't with as hard just because his father was too poor to pay for tuition?
@@echochamber8350 yes his spot should be forfeited unless there is a special grant or possible loans available. That’s basic capitalism/economics. The school would close otherwise. In a perfect world the poor kid would get in but no system if perfect. Our system may be flawed in some aspects but it’s overall the most fair system available today.
@@fender0942 Agreed. And that's exactly what the "woke" brigade needs to understand
What they want to say: Races are equality capable in everything except athleticism. To think otherwise is discriminatory
“It should be talent over everything.”
Funny, the admissions of universities should be the same.
Yeah but it’s not about talent right now not completely , lot of people get in bc of who their family is or their connections
Unfortunately university's didn't think that way. The univ. Of Ala &miss would still be all white till this day whether you qualify or not. Thats why the federal had to make corrections.
yup, AA should be abolished for school admissions.
This is dumb. You can’t just try somebody out and cut them/fire them or not start them the next week. There’s no way to judge someone’s work ability that quick. And even if you do believe they have potential, you can not just red shirt them for that year. Work is totally different than sports.
The fact is, people hire people because they may like somebody, the vibe they give off, or because of their race, even tho they have the same education and/or experience as another. This has nothing to do with physical talent
@@Theonlymayz only top tier unis
Let's take a moment to congratulate these kids for being open minded enough to change their minds and be brave enough to admit their initial views may be wrong.
I would only applaud if they truly changed.
@@andrewjankowski9650 bwahahaha
@@andrewjankowski9650 this is the problem though isnt it?...its either "you 100% agree with me or you are the enemy".
Even if they have not truly changed their minds, the fact that anyone in this day and age pauses, gives an argument a thought and accepts a logical conclusion is already way better than all the emotionally driven arguments. So yea I do think they deserve applause for this.
Hell yeah
I’d like to congratulate the girl in orange for having amazing breasts.
"I think I didn’t really think about it …" THAT is the problem. They didn’t think. They just spouted the talking points they have heard.
Exactly .
Thats exactly what the communists want. They want ur first reaction to be the crap they regurgitated at first and to not think critically. They’ve successfully dumbed down a whole generation.
"You don't even have to think about it bro"
-Ethan Klein
If I’m flying in a plane I want the best pilot!! If I’m having surgery, I want the most skilled surgeon!!!!! Common sense is pretty much lost on this generation!!!!!!
Wow I’m amazed at the stupidity of these “educated” individuals. The lack of critical thinking skills is scary for our future.
To be fair, 1. they are still young. Most if not all under 22 years old. There's a lot of the world and life they haven't experienced yet like us older folks. 2. They're not "educated" as they are still in school.
Nobody has ever engaged them in critical thinking like this before and it shows
This is radically different than when I went to college at LSU during the 70s.
The problem is that they are not being educated. They are being indoctrinated. Thank you Campus Reform for what you do.
@@squiggzzz the level of indoctrination is crazy but you are correct, many people grow out of leftism do to real life experience. This has to stop in schools though if we are to save the country.
"I'm a hypocrite, but I'm so stupid that I don't even recognize it."
The literal definition of stupidity.
Gotta give them all credit for being open to changing their position when somebody pointed out the hypocrisy.
@@LightningIguana But does it last? Do they walk away, keeping that position? I'm thinking that once they get with their like-minded friends, their "new position" disappears.
“Not for sports, we want to win”. We should want civilization to win too.
While watching a webcast of a SpaceX launch, I became curious as to the diversity of the company's employees when I noticed that the three talking heads they used were a black female, a black male and a white female. I then searched online for a group photo of the extraordinary and creative engineering teams at SpaceX. It seems as if the folks who actually do the important work at the company are 95% white males.
@@356ALX This. I can guarantee you that whoever decided on who to showcase, was not Elon. Elon himself has expressed that the problem is that there arent enough good engineers and that there is an IQ shortage, implying he believes in meritocracy. He didnt say "we havent build a moon base because we lack diversity".
Exactly - don't we want science, tech, etc... to win?
Win what exactly?
@@MegaLBreezy Technological advancement, low crime rates, etc. Are you unfamiliar with what metrics determine the health of a civilization or are you just kvetching because someone shat on your delusional worldviews about "affirmative action" turning black people into Japanese people with magic?
Im wondering why is it even a question... Sports or any other field which requires a specific skill should always be done on merit basis not quotas... Btw great video.. love from 🇮🇳
You led them to the slaughter, ingenious question set, it was amazing to watch them do a 180 on the entirety of their beliefs in one minute. Proof beyond proof that they're just regurgitating virtuous talking points without even thinking it through.
I'm honestly shocked and relieved that they were able to understand the contradiction
Same, I don't think my generation was this dumb despite everyone getting high. What happen to today's kids?
@@chrisx5127 yep
Clearly wanting to select people on the basis of ability is more important for football players than for brain surgeons. The consequences of fumbling a football are just too great.
😂😂😂😂 oh this comment is too good
We want diversity quotas on brick layers and roofers. I don’t think it fair to women that men get to do all the hard work.
Imagine for a minute owning a business and caring more about hiring based on diversity than ability to fill the roles.
That's all the American big corporations today. Replacing White people is more important to big corporations than hiring based on ability.
Imagine our current White House
@@jessesinclair3861 Especially at the most senior levels
@@Originalman144 What I’ve seen is the HR departments of large companies will of course pull from diversity sources to make their goals. It’s still up to HR usually for a pre-screening, and up to the hiring manager in the final phase to determine if the candidate is the best fit. Sometimes the interview is on the phone so they don’t see the candidate. Yes, large corporations care about their ratios, but they also want the best fit. They are under some pressure these days to make their senior management look more diverse. It’s wrong to force someone out based on their skin color, but I do believe at the most senior levels it’s happening.
It already happens all over the place.
The more troubling issue is that every student was for diversity quotas and answered without skipping a beat after being asked the initial question and never gave legitimate answers as to why they feel diversity quotas are a supposed good thing and then once posed with the hypothetical about the same principle being applied to sports every single answer started out with “its skill” and “ I didn’t think about it like that”
So before thinking these young adults are just spouting off a pc answer to a serious question without thinking about it.
Regardless of how college is a political monolith ideologically these days, this sample group of young adults just showed that they lack critical thinking skills and the ability to sit and think about a topic or question before they answer and that inability to think has been instilled in them long before attending college.
Yeah when you consider that we are talking about public policy, and public policy ultimately meaning men with guns cramming this down everyone's throats, for anyone to want legislation without having really given it even the most casual of thought, is disturbing. Public policy should be concise, effective, and most importantly constitutional, and it should not be considered likely. People want stuff nowadays to happen fast and ask questions later. "If it doesn't work out, we will just repeal it" they say even though that mostly doesn't happen.
They're programmed. Simple critical thinking can break it though because its so obviously wrong. That's why the left's main tool is censoring and silencing.
I think u are being too harsh. I'm sure some of them just didn't want to get cancelled by their fellows students
Not sure if I agree with the diversity for both because one is education and no race should be denied this and the other is a performance sport which requires skill and physical strength. How can diversity be applied to College sport if one is physically weak or weaker by comparison?
I think she opened their eyes a bit. Are debate classes still a thing?
This reminds me of the interview about redistributing their GPA. “I worked hard for my GPA! I don’t want to share it with students who didn’t work as hard as me!”
I think to be fair, when they answered to start. They all felt pressured because of the climate on campuses. It’s the “right thing to say” and they don’t ever actually think critically about it. This is a problem because if they don’t think about it they will just sit by while people push this BS
“Talent is talent is talent is talent”.
This woman has never been taught to think. The irony is palpable.
she sounded like a broken record lol
So because she has a different view she’s dumb? Have you been taught to be open minded? Honestly I challenge you to go to the mirror and say “because this woman said that she thinks talent is acquired from birth she is dumb”. Do it.
@@adiaknin6960 She's not dumb because she has a different view. She's dumb because she applies her 4xtalent argument to sports but not the workplace.
And how did those that have talent succeed? They often did not get there by talent and hard work alone. Wayne Gretzky was born in January. This gave him a huge advantage. Almost no hockey player born in December makes it into the big leagues. Bill Gates had $50,000 to buy DOS as well as other advantages that most do not have. So why are most college sports as well as professional Basketball and Football are dominated by blacks? I suspect it is not because of talent alone.
@@raulthepigchance2276 WTF are you talking about?!?
Glad to see that the students are intelligent and open-minded enough to change their mind. It also demonstrates how one-sided their upbringing has been.
Or it shows how easily they will flip when put under any kind of pressure because they don't truly care about the topic at all. Young people today are putting on a show 24/7 because they are slaves to clicks and likes and can't separate social media from reality.
If they were intelligent, they wouldn't have needed this exercise in the first place.
@@falcon2666 wrong. You can control young people’s opinions pretty easy. I voted for Bernie in the 2016 primary. Today my politics are very far from that.
Perhaps we need to more rigorously focus on measuring outcomes and their impact rather than siding emotionally with good sounding rhetoric.
@@kevinjohnston4923 I appreciate your comments.
It should be understandable to reasonable observers that young people who grow up in the midst of widespread, nonstop brainwashing (from the news, social media, movies, music, etc.) will be affected by it.
But this video shows what can happen when the truth is presented, not in a Holier Than Thou manner, but respectfully-and creatively.
Hating (however justified it may feel) only causes hating.
If black people already dominates most sports how can it be called diversity if they can also be called oppressed? Do they even know how much sports players can earn a year with just a contract.. millionsssss
Yup, the NBA would have to cut a lot if black players who've earned the right to be there, if quotas where in effect.
One of my talking points when people talk about how oppressed and racist the western world are. You freaking have people like Obama, Lebron, JayZ, etc..
Employment is about getting the best employee for your team. Everything should be based on merit!
"I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character." - Martin Luther King Jr
I quote that to many blacks. They hate it then get confused when I tell them it is a quote from MLK...lol
Georges fetanyol the first and its goddess wife breona are more relevant today.
@@guydedje6378 - Well, the population thinks those two (and more criminals) have contributed more significantly to society than anything MLK could have done. The result of lack of instilling significant education and promoting ‘feelings’ over facts.
I love the guy who first has to mention being a first time college student from Hispanic heritage. Set up his victimhood right off the bat.
He will probably be less successful than all the gardeners, landscapers, plumbers, welders, etc. in his family.
I think it's great to bring a little pride and achievement to your family, but you want to make sure it's because you achieved it yourself and not because of what you look like.
This is probably the most effective thing you could do with these questions it’s not so embarrassing for them you just gently bring to light the contradictions
This has to be satire! Kamala was right when she said 18-24 yr olds where idiots.