The Evolution of Australia
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 4 июн 2016
- See how Australia developed from an early British settlement to the modern federation, as well as New Zealand
-----------------------------------------------------
This is the Fan Request for May 2016, previous winners include:
May 2016: The Evolution of Australia, suggested by
April 2016: The History of India, suggested by Bob Jones (DaSoloHan) and Sam K
March 2016: Napoleonic Wars, suggested by Alido Kadri, silversam45, Seth Reed, L'ATOMESEUR and Them True
February 2016: Rise of the French Royal Domain, suggested by Samuel Mcnamara
January 2016: Rise and Fall of the Japanese Empire, suggested by Pascal Mapping, JC7595, Polo Games and Vologda Mapping
December 2015: The House of Habsburg, suggested by Justin Bridges
November 2015: Rise and Fall of the Russian Empire, suggested by GalacticPenguinTV
October 2015: The Great Turkish War, suggested by Kaiser Franz Josef I
-----------------------------------------------------
Music: Heat of Oak (Instrumental) 
Развлечения
![NoCap - Yacht Party [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/rm_lvDln8kE/mqdefault.jpg)
Just a quick fan request to finish off May's activities. There's plenty more coming up this month, so stay tuned!
+against the wind
It's rich that you're whining about having your comment deleted when you delete comments yourself, like when you deleted my response to you on that Christianity video. Other than that mate, this is a mapping channel dedicated to showing territory, not population statistics. If you can give me a valid reason why he should start showing population, when he hasn't done so before, be my guest.
The music, I would say Ollie chose that specifically because it's been associated with European colonization in the past.
That passive aggressive attitude towards someone who just mapped the beginnings of what is now the nation state of Australia was uncalled for. The idea of 'the nation state' is also a rather European one if I might add. What came before colonisation simply isn't as easy to map under the same definition.
Just my two cents.
***** Hold up. China? A Nation state?! I don't think you know what the concept of a nation state exactly is. It's not just "a nation" as you claimed it to be. The Roman Empire was big and sprawling, ruled a lot of land and enforced its laws in those lands (to a point) but it was never a nation state. The same way China (or Iran for that matter) never was up until the forced modernisation during the era of European Imperialism.
I urge you to look this stuff up for yourself. And also: Drop the sarcasm. It's so very tiring, it's like trying to explain something to a moody teenager.
*****
And yet it was okay for you to insult them? If you're rude then how can you honestly expect people not to be rude back? For instance, first thing you did on this video was imply Ollie is misrepresenting facts, said he likes the genocide of Aboriginals and that getting subs is the only important thing to him. By your logic, wouldn't he be in the _right_ if he did delete your comments?
It is a history channel only because of definition. As I said before, the only information he includes in his videos is territorial holdings and sometimes information on how that territory was acquired. This video is about history but only one aspect of it.
***** "...when Europe was just a forest."
That does not sound like the 'colonial time' to me, pal. That sounds like you were trying to say that Iran and China were nations while Europeans were still living in caves. But let's just forget you said that and go to the part where you call me Eurocentrist. I never not once said or implied that we invented everything.
We didn't. The Printing press 'for example' wasn't (contrary to high school teachings) invented in Europe. Now, we can argue until the sun stops rising but we're not going to. Why? Because you think being sarcastic and calling people on the internet names is debating. It's not. And we are done.
You can have the last word if you want. I won't bother to reply, and I'll probably not read it either.
Good day.
Great video Ollie!
Awesome vid m8!
The Evolution of Australia AND New Zealand
This by far the most exciting video you have ever made lol...
Of course :D
+Ollie Bye (History)
no Crocodile Dundees and any Cangaroo
it's visible on the map....
WHY ???? ;-) (joke)
Yeah that's the good thing about Australia we haven't had anyone invade us since colonialism
Short but sweet thx for that Ollie
A pitty Ollie didn't start around 50.000 BC when Aborigines discovered Australia.
Then in the year 150AD Terra Australis was a hypothetical continent.
Then in 1606 the Dutch Willem Jansz as the first European discovered Cape York.
Then the Dutch also discovered the western part in 1616, but the land seemed not worth the effort.
Then in 1770 the English James Cook discovered eastern Australia.
And then we start the video...
yup
@TheNationalist I completely agree. ollie's videos are just of countries and tribes don't count
123TeeMee
White Australia. Australia must remain a white demographic nation.
Aboriginals lived in roaming tribes of about 50 people, don't think it's very relevant here.
Er no they weren't Nations, they didn't trade, they didn't farm, they didn't have permanent housing, they didn't engage in diplomacy. If you know so much about British history, tell me in what year did the people living in Britiannia start to farm and have permanent housing?
As for talking English as a requirement for nationhood, well you just made that up in your first sentence, and then you acted like that's what other people say in your second sentence. That's called a straw man argument by the way.
Can you do one for South Africa too? I really like the Canada and Australia videos
Hey Ollie! Can you make a history of Scandinavia video?
Thon was a good video. Wars of the Three Kingdoms would be a cool one for tae do or the Jacobite rebellions. But here, that's up tae yoursel. Cheers for the video
Should've included an inset about Kashmir just to keep that gravy train rolling.
Oh yeah :D
Czarofallthecanadas ...
EH
Czarofallthecanadas You may have won the battle, but you have not won the war!
Czarofallthecanadas It's feels damned shameful, but alas, I soldier on.
Czarofallthecanadas Never surrender!
new video! :D
Can you make a future evolution of italy,
ollie doesn't do future stuff
But I also suggested that you do the Napoleonic Wars.
He already did lol
do history of khmer/khmer empire/funan/chenla/cambodia plz
You missed new holland at the start
New Holland was a ghost colony, it was never settled.
im so confused because thats what dad said but my teacher said something else
JRD B What did you teacher say?
She said the a ducth explorer named something drark Esteblished a coloney in broome but they faild
Where's the sound?
Yes I live there!
Thanks for making these videos, they're all very interesting. Unfortunately there are several mistakes however. The island's of New Zealand were not colonies of the British Empire prior to 1840. They were controlled by various Maori iwi(~tribes). Any sovereignty claims by the British were mostly limited to attempts at ensuring those trading in New Zealand could be held to account for their actions in law (at most a sphere of influence). Sovereign or constitutive power firmly rested with the various iwi in New Zealand. In 1835, this sovereignty was formerly declared in a signing of the Declaration of Independence in 1835 by Maori chiefs. It was only in 1840 that chiefs entered into an agreement with the British Empire. This is the earliest date it can be claimed that there was a colony in New Zealand. (Although it's exact meaning is still argued about in social, political and legal discourse today :)). Thanks again for all these videos though!
This is what I find odd. A lot of people say there are multiple mistakes, but they only ever say one. If you've only seen one problem, why not just say that? Either way, I was showing the claim in that scenario.
My apologies, this could be a result of my clumsy wording. I noted several mistakes as referring to the fact that the situation changed several times pre 1835, 1835-1840, then 1840 onwards (to oversimplify slightly). If we look at it as being one mistake, then we can say 'not colonies pre 1840'. Anyway, cheers for the vids.
e
Aboriginals And Torres Strait Islanders already have there great history even though they lacked names villages, towns, civilizations, and cities
I don't get how it's the land down under when Tasmania and New Zealand is down under it?
Suku Aborigin Dimana??
No music???
Why isn't this called the evolution of Australia and New Zealand?
what dose nsw stand for?
Did you do Israel yet?
Nobody pushes around the Australian Dominion
just realized, a lot of British videos recently (though India was its own thing). Possibly another History of Great Britain?
He did it
I meant a v.3
Well ik that the v.2 had mistakes like 1607 and 1842.
AdrianAtGaming oh, what was mistaken in those years?
Wasn't the netherlands first on australia?
Groote eylandt lol
Gallo-Belgica/Romano-Belgica or Germania-inferior/Francia/Bourgondie/Austrian-Flanders?/Spanisch-Flanders/French-Wallonië/The Netherlands/Napoleonic Waterloo/Belgium/Brussel-French/Germany twice/next?
Didn't the Dutch find Australia and NZ first?
yes, but never colonizeds,
TAZMAN (ship's captain),
just passed there
(the Zealand is a Netherlands region)
Lupetto Versilia
ik
+Matt Simmons ok
:-)
There's evidence to suggest that the chinease knew about australia.
Of all the European peoples, It was the Portuguese sailors who first spotted this vast land. For the original people who discovered it, That would of course be the Native Inhabitants with a history spanning 40 - 60 or 80k years on this continental Island. For the first non-Melanesian people to have discovered Australia, That would go to the Seagoing Polynesians, Then later the Chinese for commerce.
Did the aboriginals not have countries?
Australia didn't really become independent of Britain until the Australia Act of 1986.
Ignore all your critics. These excellent presentations provide an historical index tied to time and sequence for deeper and more serious study.. Of course here in the US, the study of history is curiously missing.
A suggestion for a quicki could be the history of Canada..Was Newfoundland a colony or a Canadian province?
Northern Territory & ACT: Am I a joke to you?
What about the Statue of Westminster 1931?
Australia didn't ratify it until 1944. It was only S. Africa and Canada that ratified it in 1931.
Ollie Bye Oh.
Ollie Bye I’m pretty sure Australia ratified it in 1942
The evolution of australia AND NEW ZEALAND
Australia is blue not green as well for NZ Light Blue.
Why didn't this start with new holland?
And you could have should have shown the kokoda campaign in the new guinea area
Ollie Bye, why didn't you start off when Australia was the dutch colony of New Holland?
Please state when and where the Dutch had a colony in Australia? :P They found the NW part of Australia (no place to put a colony I can tell you lol) and never went back.
The Dutch had a very small colony for a very short time (less than a month I believe).
they found the place and called it new holland but there was never a colony
Since no dutch people lived their when it was New Holland. So therefore New Holland was not a colony, but a claimed land. I apologize for my mistake.
Something you never see on RUclips nowadays, an apology! Thumbs up mate! :)
If you want, look up on the Dutch shipwreck called Batavia of the NW coast of Australia in 1628. An amazing and sad story.
It has been Dutch as Well.
The Dutch discovered it, they never claimed it.
And, The rise and fall of modern Russia from 1900.. or separately, Europe and the collapse of the Soviet Union... 1985-2016..
New Zealand is different state and not part of the federation.
Still a monarchy.
This video is 56 seconds long
Poor ol' abos
there are several things wrong with this.
1. the British didn't just show up and take half of it. that took a while.
2. Australia didn't get independence in 1944. that was when they refused to pay Britain stupid amounts of money for the right to exist. _(this happened. the British imposed a super-tax on all it's continents just for exisiting)_
3. Australia still isn't independent. it's a British colony still. hence the union jack in the flag.
why can you trust me?
i'm an Ozzy miself mate.
(i regret that. we don't talk like that i swear)
Aboriginal nations were bigger
Very inaccurate, where is the Great Siege of Sydney during the Emu Wars? Millions of men died and Australia was nearly destroyed by the sheer brutality of the Emu War.
Oh you xD
Czarofallthecanadas True
islam part 2 would be great :)
Sorry.Australia has been occupied for tens of thousands of years.Your misinformation and lies of Australias evolution are fantasy. The International Criminal Courts maybe able to assist in your research.This is Aboriginal Land.Always was ,Always will be.2016 and your education was wasted.
Can't believe this still happens in [current year]...
Can't believe this still happens in [current year]...
Can't believe this still happens in [current year]...
Can't believe this still happens in [current year]...
Can't believe this still happens in [current year]...