@@kevinhurd370 There should be 3 Casino's to choose from at the top. Try this page if the roulette one isn't working? casinomatchmaker.com/blackjack-casinos/
@@kevinhurd370 He makes a % out of your deposits. That's the only reason he posts these misleading videos. You CANNOT beat roulette, it is ALWAYS a losing game, no matter how you bet. He admitted himself those strategies have no actual edge on random betting and pure luck. Don't fall for his crap, please.
This system has some good concepts. 2 things from other systems that I would incorporate are 1. Bet on both the first 12 and second 12 (that way you are winning roughly 2/3 of the time rather than 1/2, 2. Whenever you lose (3rd 12 or a zero or double zero is spun), take off the following spins until 1st 12 or 2nd 12 is spun (you will be surprised how many losing spins you stay away from).
You cannot apply the math of a system designed with the progression and regression of even bets on a two thirds system. It would require an entirely different mathematical equation.
probability is a hit every 7 spins however i have seen losing spin runs of 21 spins on the 1st 12 2 nd 12 and 3 rd 12 - can you cope with this amount with your bankroll
Now it all makes sense! I’ve played it incorrectly for years! Just tested on a 10p table. £1 starting bet, 20p increase/decrease. Hit a negative run of 8, turned to a positive run of 5, back into negative run, back into positive run…..20 losses 17 wins and rest £5 profit. I ignored patterns as I wanted to test it just on red with no changes. Nice one….very pleased!
Not a single complex strategy earns a single penny more than random bets. You can NEVER bypass the very basic maths imposed by the game. He is lying to lure you to his website. Please don't fall for it, I have no financial incentive to tell you this, unlike him.
@@CasinoMatchmaker PLEASE Explain how losing more bets than you win still gains you a Proft????? You once said your "Mongoose" strategy did that. So which system is better? And which system is BETTER if you win about 85% of your bets? ....
D’alembert is just as risky as a martingale you just lose slower. Even odds don’t hit 50/50. If you don’t win early you’re stuck waiting it out hoping to recover.
@@buildtogether56 Not even that 500 is most people's entire bankroll. Your stop loss should be no more than 100 units. The thing is this. If your system has too great a drawdown. It's not a good system to start with. Too many systems try to outlive a long losing streak. And this is wrong. Roulette is a percentage game. If your system can't profit with flat bets. You really have nothing. My system PATTERN 7. Can profit with both FLAT BETS and a 4 step martingale. If I lose my marty that's 15 units gone. If I lose a set flat betting thats 1 to 5 units gone. But most sets result in a 1 to 8 unit profit flat betting And a 12 to 18 unit profit using a 4 step marty. And with the marty winning streaks of 80 plus in a row are possible. And thats why it wins. With flat bets I will win 4 out of 5 sets.
@@buildtogether56 That's a gambling addict mentality. Yes, put a limit to your losses, but know that this is an EXPENSE, you WILL lose long term. 100% of the time. ALWAYS.
tested your method for a few hours and it worked really well. this for games where there were only pairs or 2 options I would like to know how to calculate it so that it works with other types of strategies for example 4x or 3x or how to know how many units to increase when the chance of winning is 25% 
if you follow the previous results { red or black } and follow it each time you will find that in a series of 5 previous spins there can only be 3 of 5 or 4 of 5 or 5 of 5 of the same results .the only negative scenario is red ,black,, red ,black for several spins. but with negative progression betting the odds are in the players favor . i use a mild progression betting 1 through 5 betting the first and last numbers ( 1,2,3,4,5 ) for the first bet of 6 . if I loose I ad 6+1 for the next bet of 7if I win I scratch off the 6+1 and bet the next at 5=2 FOR A BET OF 7 AND IF i LOOSE AD 7 TO THE LIST FOR THE NEXT BET 9 AND SO ON UNTILL THE STARTING BETTING LIST IS CANCELED OF LEAVING YOU WITH A PROFIT OF 15 DOLLARS EACH TIME YOU CLEAR A STARTING BET
As I mentioned in another comment, "even chance" bets on a single zero wheel will hit 48.6% of the time. So in 100 spins I should hit on average 48 times right? Well if you do the math I'd still be in small profit, in fact even 45/100 would apparently still be slight profit. Of course 100 spins may hit less than 45 times, but statistically long-term it should be around 48-49.. yes, less than 50% but still profitable. If you are willing to use a huge sample size then this strategy has potential.
Just tried this on a craps table. 500 bank roll 50 flat bet 5 dollar units. Almost go wiped out 2 times over 8 or 9 hours but hit a crazy run walked off with almost 1k at the end. Worked pretty good, need to see how they rate my play, this may be good for comps
This is why the house has an edge of 2.7% to maybe 5%. At 2.7% house edge, you win 48.65 of the flips and they win 51.35% of the bets etc... Random systems will have an even distribution over time, so you will end up with an ROI of -2.7% "or what ever the house edge is". That is if you don't go broke by increasing bet size.
A lot of hate comments here. He starts the video stating that it’s not a fool proof way to make money. Anyway, I’m intrigued by the betting system. Might work pretty decently in baccarat, but if you can sustain hours at a roulette table, you may earn a ton of comps and free room stays. Roulette is the best game for earning comps. For a safer play though if you’re trying to grind out some wins, I’d definitely recommend playing this at the baccarat table. Good luck! Don’t forget, gambling is gambling. Don’t play more than you’re willing to lose.
This is mostly correct, on a long enough time series the distribution of the numbers will play out as expected; however, the sequence in which those numbers appear does matter..so, there are some system structures that get “lucky” because the time between the last winning numbers favors the system. I have simulation results looking at D’Lambert vs Fibonacci on dozens. Both can get whacked but there are simulations where fibonacci can be long-term profitable, which is very rare for any system.
Unless you're mega rich and can afford to bankroll really high amounts. U may aswel put in overtime at work and earn more money in what would probably take the same time to earn less at the roulette table. The extra work hours don't come with the risk of actually leaving broke at the end of the night
Great video. As long as people understand this doesnt work in the long run at -ev games, but would definitely make people lose slower in the long run. And possibly go on very very long winning streaks. Years ago a friend of mine made a computer program that tested a similar system based on the odds of betting player in baccarat. Unfortunately the system always blows up due to incredible variance.
Over the long run you have the same expected -ev whether you use this system or just make random bets. The only thing these systems do Is guarantee more winning sessions, but it also guarantees that your winning sessions will be smaller wins, and usually your losing sessions will be much larger than the average player.
JDK - You make an extremely important point. I've played 1000's and 1000s of hours of different table games. I usually play the stadium roulette, craps, blackjack, etc because of their ultra low minimum bet games which uses real dice, real roulette wheels, real card. One thing that is obvious to us all is in all games, your winning or losing streaks can be extremely high, which is enough to bankrupt any bankroll due to the table limits, if you're doing progressive increases.
@@patrickledonne5547 - Here is my REAL WORLD experience using a modified version of this betting strategy. It actually works better than just flat betting or any other strategy that I've tried. Your money on average will last longer due to the laws of probabililty. However, eventually the house edge will take down this strategy. I know first hand that those nasty losing streaks which also.....added by the house edge, will eventually beat you. I've learned to set my losing limit to around $500, which is very high limit considering I usually play on very low minimum bet stadium games. REAL WORLD....win, win, win, win, win....then entire bankroll gone. Rinse and repeat. Sometimes I will lose twice or three sessions in a row. That's $1500 gone, if my limit is $500. Sometimes my limit is only $300. It depends on how much I am willing to risk. However, I win much more than I lose. In one year, I can expect to lose a net average of about $1K, which I factor in as entertainment losses. That's been my experience.
Bet on color with minimum loss and with minimum profit on roulette is timing the key, long term play can guarantee up to 7 loss in a row or more, you should wait for rows to come so you can reduce your loss to make the martingale systems more effective! I have another example: if you loose your first 1€ bet, you can either double your bet to get profit or you bet 1€ to get your dollar back with no loss and profit, if you loose again, you can bet 2€(no profit) or you bet 3€(1€ profit). If you loose the 3€, you will have a 5€ loss, you can either bet your loss back or add a doller to your loss, in the worst case double it for maximum loss.
Unfortunately most information on this system online talk about the wrong system that start at 1 unit, and not at the base bet. So couldn't find the answer to this question: what should happen when after many wins, on the next bet we should bet 1 unit. Should we bet 1 unit? Or restarting from the base bet? Or just walk? (in that case we should decide the base bet and units on the winning goal) If we bet 1 unit, what should we do when that wins?
very pleased thank you for this mathematical solution on how to beat roulette...i tried it and tested for 15 mins i won 9x and lose 9x with a $6 profit not fat but securing your bankroll is the most important..Best of luck
Hey thanks for the feedback. If you like this system, and want to try and make money faster I would recommend watching this video: ruclips.net/video/tZ19-83ousE/видео.htmlsi=qFHzQUIBRrZqgaAF
The chance of winning and losing would not be equal because The problem is its not 50/50 chance it just 48/48 chance because the zero is green when you play a marathon it will end up that you lose more than win
@@iJukes Wrong! If the wheel has 0 and 1-36, than 1/36 is 2.7% if it has 0 and 00 its 2/36 which is 5.5555%. So with 0 and 00, you win 47.37% of the bets and they win 52.36% of the bets. Random systems produce an even distribution over time, so you will always lose 5.5555%...
tested your method for a few hours and it worked really well. this for games where there were only pairs or 2 options I would like to know how to calculate it so that it works with other types of strategies for example 4x or 3x or how to know how many units to increase when the chance of winning is 25%
So each "even" bet should hit 48.6% of the time (single zero wheel). So just say you played 100 spins, red hits 48 times and lose the other 52 times. Would you still be profit at the end? Assuming that you never reach zero (no huge streak of reds). This strategy could be useful long-term, over a huge sample size.. If you should average 48/100 and be in profit still. If you need to hit 49-50 however to be in profit, then you're gonna lose long-term.
Such a great question and I'm upset with myself for not including this in the video. Yes this system allows you to make money. Let me explain... Let's say we started with our $10 bet and lost 48 bets in a row. We would bet 10,12,14 all the way up to 104. Total all those bets together that = 2,736 Then we win 48 in a row. We would start at 106, 104, 102 and all this would bring us all the way down to betting 12. Total all of this together = 2,832. So after winning and losing 48 bets we are $96 dollars in profit. You have rightfully asked are we in profit if we lose 52 and win 48. If we lose our next 4 bets following our system it would be 10,12,14,16 which = 52. Take this 52 away from our $96 profit and we have a final profit of $44. Please let me know if that helped answer your question
@@CasinoMatchmaker Yes, that makes sense.. although not necessarily in huge streaks, if it's like more random like RRBBRBBR0BR but after 100 spins you hit red 48 times (statistically expected). I assume it should work out about the same. I'd be interested to know how many you need to hit to break even, or smallest profit.. I could work out in brute force but not sure of a good equation. If it's only like 45 or something would be great. Of course a random sample of 100 spins could only produce 40 or less reds.. but then you could continue to 500 spins, then see where you're at. Surely it would reach 48-49% eventually, at which point you should be in profit.
@@tqsuited I gave the example of them in a row just for the ease of calculation. If they alternated the math would be the same giving the same profit. If my math is correct you can win 45 out of 100 spins and still be slightly in profit
@@CasinoMatchmaker I see. This system is good then, if you hit your even bet at least 45% or more of the time (average 48.6%) then you make profit. It might be very small of course, or if below 45% then keep playing.. with a big enough bankroll and online quick-spin tables. Or just play 100 spin sessions only.. surely you will average >45% hits and long-term profit. I might try this out. Thanks for the video and replies.
Amigo, e se ao invés de apostar na cor preta ou vermelho, você marcar os próprios números ( todos os números pretos ou todos os números vermelhos da mesa ), isso funciona da mesma forma ? Haja vista que o número paga 36 vezes
@@askforalawyer7181 Logically, if you have a good and reliable bet selection process together with a suitable betting strategy, why would you not make money? I do.
I like this system, been using martingale. To reduce risk, one thing i like to do is bet minimum until i get 3 same colors in a row, then open a real bet on oposite color . That way if it goes wrorng, the loss isnt as bad. Also, after 7 in a row, i will bail to cut my losses. But i guess with this system, its not necessary.
@CasinoMatchmaker I tested this using $5 at $1 increments, worked great until the opposite color started hitting more frequently. Ended up losing a couple hundred. Fortunately, the money I lost was previous profits and wasn't my own. Not sure if you have a method to catch this before it goes too far out of control.
I was just i laughlin last week a watched a guy bet red every spin. Was fun to watch he must have hit red 25 times with only like 4 blacks. I kept telling him maybe try black he would not give in . Meanwhile im playing a mix of splits with 3 to 4 straight ups and zero s we're both hitting ang having fun. I am in no way knocking this video . Im always learning. Im more of an inside player but have been playing outside some now if i see a streak duh. Ty for video and making me a better player.
what is a good stopping point? when ur up 10x step value? greed ruins things in my experience. +10, +15, +20x seems reasonable and profitable. i look forward to playing this live. I'm gonna take a $300 min bank, $60 starting bet and $10 steps. New casino in my town.
Yea 10x step value seems to be a good stopping point. $300 might be a bit short if you're doing $10 steps starting at $60. You only need to lose 3 bets in a row and you won't be able to continue with the system. Personally I'd recomend starting at $30 and $5 steps but it's your money !
Haha a grind for sure. Funny you say that.. I'm actually investigating a atrategy I've seen where you make bets with a friend, video will be out in a couple of weeks.
I look at the numbers that the ball already landed on, then I do some calculations, then I figure out the probability of where the balls going to land and I bet on zero with 9 other spots and I usually win 10 out if 10 with a push or 2!
If you start with six units and end up with a huge losing streak, you can spend hours trying to recover the losses even with enough bankroll. Starting with six works well if you have a normal cycle or a winning streak. There is a safer way to do it. Bet one unit. If you win, consider it a completed cycle and start a new one. Or, start with two units if you wish. But six is too risky unless you want to be in and out within 20 spins win or lose.
Interesting. This is what I am trying to work out for a future video.. What's the optimal bankroll, bet size and take profit amount for this system to be really really effective. What you've mentioned sounds very similar to the Oscars grind system. Have you seen that video?
@@CasinoMatchmakerYes, it is the same principle you mentioned in the Oscar's grind video but with this strategy instead. I think that principle can work well to improve all strategies because it simplifies the overall profit target into smaller rounds of victory. Human psychology can deal with that easier and be less overwhelmed.
@@financial3836 Yea I think you are right. Treating them as single rounds of victory is definitely going to be a better way to look at it for a lot of people
You're absolutely right. If you hit a bad losing streak you'll lose your money, but you've got more chance of surviving compared to the martingale system
The problem is ur odds are not 50-50, you dont expect to win as many bets as u lose if you play a certain number of rounds, ur expected to lose many more bets than u win. Unless you can show that you will still make profit from the rounds that u won even tho u lost more bets, this is a bad strategy. E.g. for roulette ur odds are 18/38, show that if u play 38 rounds but only win 18 of them, that this betting strat still earns u profit even tho u lost the other 20 rounds. And then what if u increase it to 380 rounds? Does winning 180 and losing 200 with this betting strat still earn you profit? If the answer for both cases is No, then forget using this strategy, only use this for coin tosses
First off, stop playing on a table with 38 numbers. No matter where in the world you live, you can find a single zero roulette table. And if you win 20 and lose 22, using this method you will still make money.
@@CasinoMatchmaker Ok what about 37 number roulette tables? Lets say u play 370 rounds and win 180 and lose 190, are you trying to say u still profit despite losing 10 more rounds than u win? Or are u gonna tell me now to not play 370 rounds :D ... or even better, dont play at all
similar progression to how I play craps and buy the 4 and 10. It nearly pays 2x on a hit, and the 7 nearly shows 2 to 1 making it lose so it's near equal and all you need is a couple hits with doing a progression on loss and regress on win and your back in session profit and start over. of course like anything else you try, there's always a chance of it never recovering and busting the bankroll. it is best to have a achievable win goal and leave when reached.
@@lonnierh0dgejr41 it scales to whatever bankroll your doing. As example, on a bubble craps machine that does $1 min bets I grind out $40 free play from players card rewards and build up a bigger bankroll to play with after collecting what I can for a month or so. So basically with something like $100 or less bankroll start at $2 buy on each 4 & 10. If it loses, repeat the bets & increase $1 each. If it wins and you have a new high bankroll reset the bets. If it's a win after a lose streak but not a new high, you could (should) be conservative and lower the bets or if it's close enough just go ahead and reset. If it goes on a bad streak and your on a tight bankroll for the session, it's better to preserve the bankroll & start over trying to grind it out cuz otherwise you'll be stuck at the progression and no bankroll. Test it out watch how fast you can make $50 with a $100 bankroll, don't let the progression take the bets higher than $6, preserve the bankroll and start over so it has a chance to keep grinding it out. When you catch a win streak it takes you to a win goal you should have set before you started playing and cash out. Don't sit there keep playing it on and on, hit the goal and get out of there.
The pay on buying the 4 & 10 on bubble craps pays the exact change, unlike at the table where they round it and cheat you the change. The calculation is bet x's 2 and you have to pay for the Vig (5% of the bet). So (Bet * 2) - (Bet * 5%): ($2 * 2) - ($2 * .05) = $3.9 ($3 * 2) - ($3 * .05) = $5.85 and so on.... 1 1.95 2 3.9 3 5.85 4 7.8 5 9.75 6 11.7 7 13.65 8 15.6 9 17.55 10 19.5
Have you figured out a good strategy on the 4 and 10 ? I thought about doing a Martingale Strategy using buying both numbers at the same time , the odds are the same as the 7
Do this on a field bet on craps. You have a chance of a 2x or 3x with the 2 and 12. There's a 44.4% chance of hitting a field number. You have a 47.3 chance of hitting red or black on roulette, but you dont get the 2x or 3x.
Love the system, you recommend a starting bet of $30 and reducing or increasing by $5 Just to be sure. Do you mean your first spin is $30 ?? and then reducing or increasing by $5
Stats, forecasting & live poker background here. I did like your maths & your script, very well explained! But _(you knew it lol!)_ "wait for a streak b4 playing" isn't correct. Every spin is independent, streaks don't exist. Yes, we can agree that 6 reds in a row is 48% less likely than 5 in a row, but that misses the point. We are betting on 1 spin in an endless cycle, not "will a 6th red drop?" In cash poker games there's also no "starting" or "ending" hand per se, it's all about volume overcoming variance in the long run. In poker, one deal is the same as any other & so 'luck' is equal, only skill differs in the long run. Anyway, cheers from Australia.
@@CasinoMatchmaker OMG how can you actually spread such BS. Past results have ZERO influence on future ones. ZERO. ZERO. ZERO. This is incredibly basic logic, waiting for patterns is as stupid as blowing on the dices before throwing them. This scammer knows it perfectly, he is selling you a lie and trying to lure you to his gambling site !
I tried this method on free site and got lots of fake profits. He know that it still is a 50/50 hes just trying to help, you don’t gotta take it so personally
Winning depends on an equal number of wins. Anyone playing Roulette knows that losing streak can last all day and longer until assets in the millions can be lost. It's called fat tail events in statistics.
Wow man thanks for letting us know that gambling isn’t a 100 percent win rate. Thanks for letting me know, i always thought i could bet and win every single time and steal their money
I ran this system in the computer simulator. The reason it does not work is because you need to win 49% of the time to be profitable. The house edge stops that from happening in the long run, even on single zero wheels.
Hey Ron. Can you please watch this video and let me know if you agree with the calculations? It's my understanding that if you hit the amount of wins that you should hit.. You will make money using this system ruclips.net/video/8docBGwgPSY/видео.htmlsi=UK4MDCo5nsIRZ4Yo
@@CasinoMatchmaker No its doesn't tilt the edge towards the player, you lying pos. You admitted it yourself in another comment, every bet has a negative expected return, no matter the betting size or pattern.
That's an interesting concept. But we would need to keep our 3-2 ratio. So if we increased our even chance bet using this system then we need to increase the column bet as well to stay with the ratio. Does that make sense?
800 dollar bankroll -- start with 4 - loose and bet 6 -- loose bet 8 -- loose bet 10 -- win next bet 8 --- win next bet 6 -- loose nb 8 -- win nb 6 -- win nb 4 and so on ...... after 50 dollar won you start with 4 dollar again --- see how it works !!!
Yea that's exactly right. But don't start at the minimum bet. You won't take advantage of your winning streaks. You need to be able to lower your bet each time you win, otherwise it doesn't work as well
You wanna start at a 10 dollar minimum table and bet 30 dollars. If you lose you increase your bet by 5 and if you lose you decrease your bet by 5. You do this until your ready to leave and happy with your profit. Leave after you lose all your money which rarely happens but is still possible, or you leave once you win on the minimum bet. The system makes it so if you win and lose 50/50 you still make profit. After you win on 10 you can can walk away or restart at 30
The waiting for a streak to have passed doesn't work. The chance of X spins being red, after already having landed on red Y times, is the exact same as if the previous spin was black or 0. Individual spins don't affect other spins.
That is not entirely true. It is true that each individual spin has the same odds. But it is also true that there are mathematical probabilities of sequences within a number of spins. This is the same with flipping a coin. The chances of getting heads or tales is 50% every time. But the chances of getting the same side of the coin in a row in sequence decreases per addition. In other words, the odds of individual spins is a separate odds than sequences of spins. Probability is never a guarantee though.
Why stay at that session for that long? Quit the session after 5 loses in a row. Start a new session and continue where you left off after quitting the losing session. You still my lose but at least you have a way better chance at recouping your loses and making a profit by quitting losing streaks before they get way out of hand.
The fact that you mentioned waiting on a streak and suggesting that means anything in a game where each result is independent takes credit away from anything else you’d suggest.
This is referring to the fact that you would be 5 steps into the sequence, instead you can enter on step 1. I've not been clear on the point I was trying to make in this part of the video. Apologies
@@askforalawyer7181 Hold the phone. He is offering information on how to do better at a table game and how to properly implement strategies. You can take or leave his suggestions. He makes it clear that there is not guaranteed win. Why are you watching videos about gambling if you are bitter about it?
The only bet strategy that will work consistently is a positive bet progression…..ALL negative bet progressions will eventually get you to table max and you’ll lose your bankroll …it’s just a matter of time….
@@robertmorris3559 Follow the winner ? Are you guys serious ? Get help, you have an addiction issue, it's never to late to realize it and get into recovery.
Hi, at 7:00 why did you bet $20 on the winning side while only betting $10 on the losing side? What would the next bet be if you won $10 on the winning side, $8 ?
That last example of $10 would have played out +10,+8,+6,-4,-6,-8,-10,+12,-10,+12 = +10 dollar profit. If you wait for any even money bet to come out 3 times in a row and red does, do you then bet black once or keep betting black until you win?
This is one of the few vids where the zero and double zero aren't mentioned. These are not 50/50 chance bets. It stated the longer u play this the better your profits but thats not true. The casino has the long game as the longer u play the more the house edge takes hold. U start at 30 and win. Walk away 30 bucks ahead and count yourself lucky. It's interesting for sure but I'd say use it in blackjack where the house edge is lower. As long as u know basic strategy.
I've been playing a modified version of this strategy for years consistently walking away with profits. You really need to wait for a pattern to get the best results
@@CasinoMatchmaker I look for certain patterns. Like you mentioned in the video, I usually wait for 3 of the same before placing an initial bet, but not necessarily 3, sometimes 2 and other times 4, I do that by looking at the last 10 spins. I also have a maximum that I won't increase over and I never go under my initial bet, so I have a minimum also. Most of the time, after spotting my pattern, my initial bet or second bet bring me in profit, so I'm out of that series of bets and wait for another pattern before I place another bet again. So very often I won't bet on anything as I don't have a pattern and I have already made profit from my last basket/series of bets. I also will bet on any of the combinations that pay out 1 for 1. (Red/Black)... (Odd/Even) ... (1-18/19-36) I don't mind as long as I see a pattern I like. I also will only play the European tables never a double zero table. The key is to be patient, you really shouldn't want to be in with a bet on every spin. A bit hard to explain it all but it's something that I personally understand and mathematically makes sense. It's all about probabilities and even though each spin is 50/50 to be red or black (minus the green) the chances of 5 red or 5 black numbers in a row are quite low and of course from time to time you'll get even more, but streaks of one colour is eventually followed by a streak of the other color.
In theory, i could play with a friend. I play black and friend plays red. Using this strategy, we would both be ahead? I just tried this for an 1.5 hours and i am up $95. Started betting at $10 (moved $2 each win/loss) and ended betting at $14. Still up $95
Oh wow that's a very interesting concept. As long as there were no exceptionally long runs of a single colour to lose your bankrol, I think you'd both be in profit
I've just come across a strategy that you can play with a friend to improve your chances of winning. I'll be doing some more research and publish it in the coming weeks
No roulette betting system will ever work in the long run. You will lose 19 out of 37 times and win 18 out of 37 times, resulting in an expected loss of 2.7% for every bet. This system here has a flaw. Chance of winning in not the same as chance of losing. increasing a bet with an increment will lead to incremented bet sizes, but not to positive EV. You will bust most of the times.
@@francoiskeulen I should have included this in the video but I only ran the calculations after someone pointed it out in the comments. this system allows you to make money, even when losing more bets than you win. Let me explain... Let's say we started with our $10 bet and lost 48 bets in a row. We would bet 10,12,14 all the way up to 104. Total all those bets together that = 2,736 Then we win 48 in a row. We would start at 106, 104, 102 and all this would bring us all the way down to betting 12. Total all of this together = 2,832. So after winning and losing 48 bets we are $96 dollars in profit. If we lose our next 4 bets following our system it would be 10,12,14,16 which = 52. Take this 52 away from our $96 profit and we have a final profit of $44. This is a situation where we lose 52% of our bets
@@CasinoMatchmaker I have used you betting system to run a couple of simulations. Every 37 rounds the bet goes up one increment (on average) and in the long run, you either go bust (largest probability) or you win big (smaller probability) Expected result is negative.
LOL. Developed by a mathematician so it is better. That is so funny. I am a HS dropout and figured this out all by myself long before seeing this. Had no idea until today that is was a system already being used. I am also amazed by how many did not know this already as it is the simplest wagering system around. I certainly hope they know it has a serious flaw that pops up in the higher wagers.
The narrator said at least broken down 6 times. So that would be 15 or 16 dollars you start with. Also, use a stop loss of a certain amount of money and if you lose 5 times in a row, quit the session and start a new session betting where you left off at the losing session.
@@angravante Alright, I'm trying this and seeming to have better luck. So to keep the math simple: I start with $2000 and am using $100 broken down less than 6 times for $15 units. If I lose 5 times in a row and my bet is up to $75, change to $10 units until I get back into profit. Is that close enough to what you're suggesting?
@@thriftynick27 That sounds good but I would quit that losing session and start a new session at a new table or new online table. If you are starting at $100 and lose 5 bets in a row, your next new session bet at the new table would be $190 and if that wins, next bet would be $175. You could go to adding or subtracting $10 but you would have to win more times than you lose in a less than 50/50 game. I would have at least $5000 total for this overall. I am interested in your results, thank you.
The system makes math sense until you add 0/00. If 0/00 comes up 1 in 40 spins you are likely a small winner, 1 in 20 times a small loser. It's still luck against a house edge.
Hello. Yes the Zero gives the house a slight edge. Check out this game using the system and you will see even with a small house edge you can make money from this system.. ruclips.net/video/tZ19-83ousE/видео.html
I can bet you 100% you will lose if you play this way. If you don’t play don’t try to teach people. Just pure crap. I challenge you to post a online play with real money and consistently win. Which you can never do.
It is a hell of a lot better than any martingale system. You just have to have a stop loss and if you lose a certain amount of times , quit that session and start a new one and continue where you left off at the last session.
You will not win 5 consecutive bets often enough to overcome your losses….Your bets will climb so high ghat you’ll never get back to your start amount….
Yea it's very good for Blackjack as well. If you win a double, then you count it as 2 bets won. so you move down the sequence twice. Same if you lose, then you move up the system twice
@@CasinoMatchmaker dont you get paid double for a black jack seems like that in it self would make you profitable if you were at least wining 47% of your hands
If you double down or you split your pairs, just go down two unitd when you win and go up two units when you lose. It’s just an up-and-down situation with the the goal of reaching zero
What's the point with bonuses when you have an impossible rollover to achieve !! They give you $75 to ur $25 =$100 with a 35× rollover meaning you have to wager $3500 to be able to start winning . Those odds are not in ur favor. Screw the bonuses unless your new and want to practice ?
It's extra money to play with, there's absolutely no harm in taking the extra money. 35x is pretty easy to complete on Roulette, especially if you're using a smart betting strategy. I'd personally always take a good bonus, I can't see any downside to it
Never bet on the same Color, Odd/Even or High/Low. Change them regularly. You can win with any system out there if you can pick the right winning numbers each time.
Why with any game and any system you have a stop loss, whether x amount of y hits in a row like 7 reds in a row or say to yourself I’m gonna lose $100 before I stop or take a break, and wait for the streak to end. Cuz it will end, eventually.
Tried this method for a while playing bj and even tho i lost a lot i still gained money and doubled it. With this method if you were to play 12 hands 6 you win and 6 you lose you still are up a descent amount
Exactly my friend! I also love this on Blackjack. I've just found a game at a blockchain casino that makes this strategy a fantastic money maker. I'll be posting the video soon so make sure to check back
Okay, i used your advice on betting 30 dollars on a 10 dollar minimum table just pretending on a for fun online game. I ended up doing ur method but once i won on the minimum bet i would just go back to my starting bet of 30, did this for 100 hands and made a total of 1000 just going in with 300. That comes out to about an average profit of 10 dollar per hand. I tried doing a ton of other roulette methods and they never worked. This is probably the best method i have come across so far. Unfortunately i am not able to bet because of my age but i got curious of what the best method was after trying to beat my family on the roulette table. I told my dad about this and the next time he goes hes gonna try it out. I thought 300 dollars was just the right amount of money. My parents end up going with 100-300 on nights out with my extended family and most of the time end up losing it so even if it doesn’t work it won’t really mean anything. I was wondering what the best way to play bj is tho. Through machines or on a table.
Don’t really know why people are hating on this method. Obviously theres still risk but you make it so that even if you win half and lose half you make money. I like it with bj tho because i increase my odds of winning just of experience and knowledge of the game. And every once in a while when you get a bj you get even more money. Its way better than martingale cause it can stack up pretty quickly
@@CasinoMatchmakerthanks for the video. Would u please do a video using a similar progression when playing 2 dozen or 2 columns for your subscribers all over the world. Thanks 👍.
Best Online Casinos to play roulette > casinomatchmaker.com/roulette-casinos/
I see an article, but no list of US casinos?
@@kevinhurd370 There should be 3 Casino's to choose from at the top.
Try this page if the roulette one isn't working?
casinomatchmaker.com/blackjack-casinos/
No UK casinos showing?@@CasinoMatchmaker
@@kevinhurd370 He makes a % out of your deposits. That's the only reason he posts these misleading videos. You CANNOT beat roulette, it is ALWAYS a losing game, no matter how you bet. He admitted himself those strategies have no actual edge on random betting and pure luck. Don't fall for his crap, please.
I usually play 2 dozens. Can this system be reworked for playing 2 dozens/columns?
This system has some good concepts. 2 things from other systems that I would incorporate are 1. Bet on both the first 12 and second 12 (that way you are winning roughly 2/3 of the time rather than 1/2, 2. Whenever you lose (3rd 12 or a zero or double zero is spun), take off the following spins until 1st 12 or 2nd 12 is spun (you will be surprised how many losing spins you stay away from).
how do progress with money ? its difficult to calculate
You mention the bet 1st and 2nd 12 from another system, does that system have a name or can you explain it more? Thanks
You cannot apply the math of a system designed with the progression and regression of even bets on a two thirds system. It would require an entirely different mathematical equation.
probability is a hit every 7 spins however i have seen losing spin runs of 21 spins on the 1st 12 2 nd 12 and 3 rd 12 - can you cope with this amount with your bankroll
Now it all makes sense! I’ve played it incorrectly for years! Just tested on a 10p table. £1 starting bet, 20p increase/decrease. Hit a negative run of 8, turned to a positive run of 5, back into negative run, back into positive run…..20 losses 17 wins and rest £5 profit. I ignored patterns as I wanted to test it just on red with no changes. Nice one….very pleased!
Fantastic!
Yes with this strategy even losing more bets than you win, you can still make a profit
Not a single complex strategy earns a single penny more than random bets. You can NEVER bypass the very basic maths imposed by the game. He is lying to lure you to his website. Please don't fall for it, I have no financial incentive to tell you this, unlike him.
@@CasinoMatchmaker PLEASE Explain how losing more bets than you win still gains you a Proft????? You once said your "Mongoose" strategy did that. So which system is better? And which system is BETTER if you win about 85% of your bets?
....
Works until a loooong losing streak or extended losing over winning, then you hit the table max and it is all over, just like most systems.
I have been looking for a RELIABLE SYSTEM to take to the casino and this is IT!!! Been running simulations and it works VERY WELL!!!
I love this system, I've done a video where I use it at the blackjack table and it's great
im about to make some simulations too
How big is your sample size?
D’alembert is just as risky as a martingale you just lose slower. Even odds don’t hit 50/50. If you don’t win early you’re stuck waiting it out hoping to recover.
It has it's flaws but I personally think it's way less risky than the martingale
Bro set a limit for a day like if u loss 500 then leave try next time every day is a not wining day
@@buildtogether56
Not even that 500 is most people's entire bankroll. Your stop loss should be no more than 100 units.
The thing is this. If your system has too great a drawdown. It's not a good system to start with.
Too many systems try to outlive a long losing streak. And this is wrong. Roulette is a percentage game.
If your system can't profit with flat bets. You really have nothing.
My system PATTERN 7. Can profit with both FLAT BETS and a 4 step martingale.
If I lose my marty that's 15 units gone. If I lose a set flat betting thats 1 to 5 units gone. But most sets result in a 1 to 8 unit profit flat betting And a 12 to 18 unit profit using a 4 step marty. And with the marty winning streaks of 80 plus in a row are possible. And thats why it wins. With flat bets I will win 4 out of 5 sets.
@@buildtogether56 That's a gambling addict mentality. Yes, put a limit to your losses, but know that this is an EXPENSE, you WILL lose long term. 100% of the time. ALWAYS.
You are so right! Just expect to lose and don’t rely on these strategies… I’m with you on this one
tested your method for a few hours and it worked really well. this for games where there were only pairs or 2 options I would like to know how to calculate it so that it works with other types of strategies for example 4x or 3x or how to know how many units to increase when the chance of winning is 25%

if you follow the previous results { red or black } and follow it each time you will find that in a series of 5 previous spins there can only be 3 of 5 or 4 of 5 or 5 of 5 of the same results .the only negative scenario is red ,black,, red ,black for several spins. but with negative progression betting the odds are in the players favor . i use a mild progression betting 1 through 5 betting the first and last numbers ( 1,2,3,4,5 ) for the first bet of 6 . if I loose I ad 6+1 for the next bet of 7if I win I scratch off the 6+1 and bet the next at 5=2 FOR A BET OF 7 AND IF i LOOSE AD 7 TO THE LIST FOR THE NEXT BET 9 AND SO ON UNTILL THE STARTING BETTING LIST IS CANCELED OF LEAVING YOU WITH A PROFIT OF 15 DOLLARS EACH TIME YOU CLEAR A STARTING BET
The challenge of these systems is that the bets are not actually "even chance", due to the 0 (or 0 and 00). They will lose money in the long run.
As I mentioned in another comment, "even chance" bets on a single zero wheel will hit 48.6% of the time. So in 100 spins I should hit on average 48 times right? Well if you do the math I'd still be in small profit, in fact even 45/100 would apparently still be slight profit. Of course 100 spins may hit less than 45 times, but statistically long-term it should be around 48-49.. yes, less than 50% but still profitable. If you are willing to use a huge sample size then this strategy has potential.
Every system is doomed to lose over a longer period of time
@@tqsuited I'm actually considering running a simulation on this just to see
@@bruce4139 if you're ahead, say, 15-20 units, decrease by 2 or 3 to compensate. This stops the inevitable escalation.
Just tried this on a craps table. 500 bank roll 50 flat bet 5 dollar units. Almost go wiped out 2 times over 8 or 9 hours but hit a crazy run walked off with almost 1k at the end. Worked pretty good, need to see how they rate my play, this may be good for comps
Makes sense, however, most casinos require bets in units of 5 or 10 dollars and don't allow breaking down to single or double dollars
Yes you are correct.
I'd recommend $30 starting point and going up or down $5
@@CasinoMatchmaker Would you also recommend that if 10$ and 2$ is possible too? and minimum stake is 1$?
Interesting. I used to experiment with coin tossing using this staking system. From my experiment it retured 5 %roi.
This is why the house has an edge of 2.7% to maybe 5%. At 2.7% house edge, you win 48.65 of the flips and they win 51.35% of the bets etc... Random systems will have an even distribution over time, so you will end up with an ROI of -2.7% "or what ever the house edge is". That is if you don't go broke by increasing bet size.
A lot of hate comments here. He starts the video stating that it’s not a fool proof way to make money. Anyway, I’m intrigued by the betting system. Might work pretty decently in baccarat, but if you can sustain hours at a roulette table, you may earn a ton of comps and free room stays. Roulette is the best game for earning comps. For a safer play though if you’re trying to grind out some wins, I’d definitely recommend playing this at the baccarat table. Good luck! Don’t forget, gambling is gambling. Don’t play more than you’re willing to lose.
There are so many systems ! But the fact is no system can ever beat the house !
This is mostly correct, on a long enough time series the distribution of the numbers will play out as expected; however, the sequence in which those numbers appear does matter..so, there are some system structures that get “lucky” because the time between the last winning numbers favors the system. I have simulation results looking at D’Lambert vs Fibonacci on dozens. Both can get whacked but there are simulations where fibonacci can be long-term profitable, which is very rare for any system.
No system to beat the house !!!! If you play .. so play and enjoy the games and you can afford to loose
Unless you're mega rich and can afford to bankroll really high amounts. U may aswel put in overtime at work and earn more money in what would probably take the same time to earn less at the roulette table. The extra work hours don't come with the risk of actually leaving broke at the end of the night
Great video. As long as people understand this doesnt work in the long run at -ev games, but would definitely make people lose slower in the long run. And possibly go on very very long winning streaks. Years ago a friend of mine made a computer program that tested a similar system based on the odds of betting player in baccarat. Unfortunately the system always blows up due to incredible variance.
Baccarat is a cool game to use this system on, I also really like it with Blackjack
Over the long run you have the same expected -ev whether you use this system or just make random bets. The only thing these systems do Is guarantee more winning sessions, but it also guarantees that your winning sessions will be smaller wins, and usually your losing sessions will be much larger than the average player.
JDK - You make an extremely important point. I've played 1000's and 1000s of hours of different table games. I usually play the stadium roulette, craps, blackjack, etc because of their ultra low minimum bet games which uses real dice, real roulette wheels, real card. One thing that is obvious to us all is in all games, your winning or losing streaks can be extremely high, which is enough to bankrupt any bankroll due to the table limits, if you're doing progressive increases.
@@patrickledonne5547 - Here is my REAL WORLD experience using a modified version of this betting strategy. It actually works better than just flat betting or any other strategy that I've tried. Your money on average will last longer due to the laws of probabililty. However, eventually the house edge will take down this strategy. I know first hand that those nasty losing streaks which also.....added by the house edge, will eventually beat you. I've learned to set my losing limit to around $500, which is very high limit considering I usually play on very low minimum bet stadium games.
REAL WORLD....win, win, win, win, win....then entire bankroll gone. Rinse and repeat. Sometimes I will lose twice or three sessions in a row. That's $1500 gone, if my limit is $500. Sometimes my limit is only $300. It depends on how much I am willing to risk.
However, I win much more than I lose. In one year, I can expect to lose a net average of about $1K, which I factor in as entertainment losses. That's been my experience.
@patrickledonne5547 yes exactly.
Bet on color with minimum loss and with minimum profit on roulette is timing the key, long term play can guarantee up to 7 loss in a row or more, you should wait for rows to come so you can reduce your loss to make the martingale systems more effective! I have another example: if you loose your first 1€ bet, you can either double your bet to get profit or you bet 1€ to get your dollar back with no loss and profit, if you loose again, you can bet 2€(no profit) or you bet 3€(1€ profit). If you loose the 3€, you will have a 5€ loss, you can either bet your loss back or add a doller to your loss, in the worst case double it for maximum loss.
Adding a doller toyour loss bet can hold you longer in long-term
Unfortunately most information on this system online talk about the wrong system that start at 1 unit, and not at the base bet. So couldn't find the answer to this question: what should happen when after many wins, on the next bet we should bet 1 unit. Should we bet 1 unit? Or restarting from the base bet? Or just walk? (in that case we should decide the base bet and units on the winning goal)
If we bet 1 unit, what should we do when that wins?
I would recommend walking away when you get to 1 unit.
There's no reason to carry on if you can't reduce your bet if you win
very pleased thank you for this mathematical solution on how to beat roulette...i tried it and tested for 15 mins i won 9x and lose 9x with a $6 profit not fat but securing your bankroll is the most important..Best of luck
Hey thanks for the feedback.
If you like this system, and want to try and make money faster I would recommend watching this video:
ruclips.net/video/tZ19-83ousE/видео.htmlsi=qFHzQUIBRrZqgaAF
The chance of winning and losing would not be equal because The problem is its not 50/50 chance it just 48/48 chance because the zero is green when you play a marathon it will end up that you lose more than win
the 0 is less than 1%
@@iJukes Wrong! If the wheel has 0 and 1-36, than 1/36 is 2.7% if it has 0 and 00 its 2/36 which is 5.5555%. So with 0 and 00, you win 47.37% of the bets and they win 52.36% of the bets. Random systems produce an even distribution over time, so you will always lose 5.5555%...
These videos are pure comedy gold 😅
Thanks Gary
tested your method for a few hours and it worked really well.
this for games where there were only pairs or 2 options
I would like to know how to calculate it so that it works with other types of strategies
for example 4x or 3x
or how to know how many units to increase when the chance of winning is 25%
So each "even" bet should hit 48.6% of the time (single zero wheel). So just say you played 100 spins, red hits 48 times and lose the other 52 times. Would you still be profit at the end? Assuming that you never reach zero (no huge streak of reds). This strategy could be useful long-term, over a huge sample size.. If you should average 48/100 and be in profit still. If you need to hit 49-50 however to be in profit, then you're gonna lose long-term.
Such a great question and I'm upset with myself for not including this in the video.
Yes this system allows you to make money. Let me explain...
Let's say we started with our $10 bet and lost 48 bets in a row.
We would bet 10,12,14 all the way up to 104. Total all those bets together that = 2,736
Then we win 48 in a row.
We would start at 106, 104, 102 and all this would bring us all the way down to betting 12.
Total all of this together = 2,832.
So after winning and losing 48 bets we are $96 dollars in profit.
You have rightfully asked are we in profit if we lose 52 and win 48.
If we lose our next 4 bets following our system it would be 10,12,14,16 which = 52.
Take this 52 away from our $96 profit and we have a final profit of $44.
Please let me know if that helped answer your question
@@CasinoMatchmaker Yes, that makes sense.. although not necessarily in huge streaks, if it's like more random like RRBBRBBR0BR but after 100 spins you hit red 48 times (statistically expected). I assume it should work out about the same. I'd be interested to know how many you need to hit to break even, or smallest profit.. I could work out in brute force but not sure of a good equation. If it's only like 45 or something would be great. Of course a random sample of 100 spins could only produce 40 or less reds.. but then you could continue to 500 spins, then see where you're at. Surely it would reach 48-49% eventually, at which point you should be in profit.
@@tqsuited I gave the example of them in a row just for the ease of calculation.
If they alternated the math would be the same giving the same profit.
If my math is correct you can win 45 out of 100 spins and still be slightly in profit
@@CasinoMatchmaker I see. This system is good then, if you hit your even bet at least 45% or more of the time (average 48.6%) then you make profit. It might be very small of course, or if below 45% then keep playing.. with a big enough bankroll and online quick-spin tables. Or just play 100 spin sessions only.. surely you will average >45% hits and long-term profit. I might try this out. Thanks for the video and replies.
Amigo, e se ao invés de apostar na cor preta ou vermelho, você marcar os próprios números ( todos os números pretos ou todos os números vermelhos da mesa ), isso funciona da mesma forma ? Haja vista que o número paga 36 vezes
Ultimately, any betting system is going nowhere without a decent bet seleccion method.
You are absolutely correct.. Bet selection is key
Any betting system is going nowhere. You will lose no matter what.
@@askforalawyer7181 Logically, if you have a good and reliable bet selection process together with a suitable betting strategy, why would you not make money? I do.
I started 5 units bet but it doesnt go very well, my last bets was 34 units and still doesnt have any profit
I like this system, been using martingale. To reduce risk, one thing i like to do is bet minimum until i get 3 same colors in a row, then open a real bet on oposite color . That way if it goes wrorng, the loss isnt as bad. Also, after 7 in a row, i will bail to cut my losses. But i guess with this system, its not necessary.
Yea this one is much safer than martingale Even 8+ losses in a row it hurts but it hasn't wiped you out
@CasinoMatchmaker I tested this using $5 at $1 increments, worked great until the opposite color started hitting more frequently. Ended up losing a couple hundred. Fortunately, the money I lost was previous profits and wasn't my own. Not sure if you have a method to catch this before it goes too far out of control.
Go with the last color that hit. However, you can lose if the the color keeps alternating like R/B/R/B. It happened to me 7 times in a row!
I was just i laughlin last week a watched a guy bet red every spin. Was fun to watch he must have hit red 25 times with only like 4 blacks. I kept telling him maybe try black he would not give in . Meanwhile im playing a mix of splits with 3 to 4 straight ups and zero s we're both hitting ang having fun. I am in no way knocking this video . Im always learning. Im more of an inside player but have been playing outside some now if i see a streak duh. Ty for video and making me a better player.
what is a good stopping point? when ur up 10x step value? greed ruins things in my experience. +10, +15, +20x seems reasonable and profitable. i look forward to playing this live. I'm gonna take a $300 min bank, $60 starting bet and $10 steps. New casino in my town.
Yea 10x step value seems to be a good stopping point.
$300 might be a bit short if you're doing $10 steps starting at $60.
You only need to lose 3 bets in a row and you won't be able to continue with the system.
Personally I'd recomend starting at $30 and $5 steps but it's your money !
You should stop before you start. You will lose, it's inevitable.
Love your mathematical strategies
Thank you
a slow grind but doable.. Take a friend so your not caught talking to yourself , lol.. thanks for this.
Haha a grind for sure.
Funny you say that..
I'm actually investigating a atrategy I've seen where you make bets with a friend, video will be out in a couple of weeks.
I look at the numbers that the ball already landed on, then I do some calculations, then I figure out the probability of where the balls going to land and I bet on zero with 9 other spots and I usually win 10 out if 10 with a push or 2!
Sir excellent technique you are the man greeting from Texas 🇺🇸!!!
Would be good if you had a roulette table to show your examples i know its always random but would be a good visualisation
Thanks for the feedback.
I'm going to start doing this soon.
First sharing the concepts and the math and then I'll show live examples
If you start with six units and end up with a huge losing streak, you can spend hours trying to recover the losses even with enough bankroll. Starting with six works well if you have a normal cycle or a winning streak. There is a safer way to do it. Bet one unit. If you win, consider it a completed cycle and start a new one. Or, start with two units if you wish. But six is too risky unless you want to be in and out within 20 spins win or lose.
Interesting.
This is what I am trying to work out for a future video.. What's the optimal bankroll, bet size and take profit amount for this system to be really really effective.
What you've mentioned sounds very similar to the Oscars grind system. Have you seen that video?
@@CasinoMatchmakerYes, it is the same principle you mentioned in the Oscar's grind video but with this strategy instead. I think that principle can work well to improve all strategies because it simplifies the overall profit target into smaller rounds of victory. Human psychology can deal with that easier and be less overwhelmed.
@@financial3836 Yea I think you are right. Treating them as single rounds of victory is definitely going to be a better way to look at it for a lot of people
I think this will keep you in the game longer than martingale. Still risk of ruin if there's a long enough losing streak though
You're absolutely right.
If you hit a bad losing streak you'll lose your money, but you've got more chance of surviving compared to the martingale system
Roulette jackpot channel here on RUclips has better strategies
The problem is ur odds are not 50-50, you dont expect to win as many bets as u lose if you play a certain number of rounds, ur expected to lose many more bets than u win. Unless you can show that you will still make profit from the rounds that u won even tho u lost more bets, this is a bad strategy.
E.g. for roulette ur odds are 18/38, show that if u play 38 rounds but only win 18 of them, that this betting strat still earns u profit even tho u lost the other 20 rounds.
And then what if u increase it to 380 rounds? Does winning 180 and losing 200 with this betting strat still earn you profit?
If the answer for both cases is No, then forget using this strategy, only use this for coin tosses
What about using this strategy for Baccarat?
First off, stop playing on a table with 38 numbers.
No matter where in the world you live, you can find a single zero roulette table.
And if you win 20 and lose 22, using this method you will still make money.
@@CasinoMatchmaker Ok what about 37 number roulette tables? Lets say u play 370 rounds and win 180 and lose 190, are you trying to say u still profit despite losing 10 more rounds than u win? Or are u gonna tell me now to not play 370 rounds :D
... or even better, dont play at all
@@CasinoMatchmaker - Hard to find single zero in the US. I did a search. They exist, but very very few and the minimum is usually $100.
Triple zero is more common than single zero
Great for Electronic Roulette
similar progression to how I play craps and buy the 4 and 10. It nearly pays 2x on a hit, and the 7 nearly shows 2 to 1 making it lose so it's near equal and all you need is a couple hits with doing a progression on loss and regress on win and your back in session profit and start over. of course like anything else you try, there's always a chance of it never recovering and busting the bankroll. it is best to have a achievable win goal and leave when reached.
Wow that's pretty intense, where do you play craps?
let's say you're on a $5 minimum table. what bet do you start with on the 4 and 10? do you buy both? what's your progression?
@@lonnierh0dgejr41 it scales to whatever bankroll your doing. As example, on a bubble craps machine that does $1 min bets I grind out $40 free play from players card rewards and build up a bigger bankroll to play with after collecting what I can for a month or so. So basically with something like $100 or less bankroll start at $2 buy on each 4 & 10. If it loses, repeat the bets & increase $1 each. If it wins and you have a new high bankroll reset the bets. If it's a win after a lose streak but not a new high, you could (should) be conservative and lower the bets or if it's close enough just go ahead and reset. If it goes on a bad streak and your on a tight bankroll for the session, it's better to preserve the bankroll & start over trying to grind it out cuz otherwise you'll be stuck at the progression and no bankroll. Test it out watch how fast you can make $50 with a $100 bankroll, don't let the progression take the bets higher than $6, preserve the bankroll and start over so it has a chance to keep grinding it out. When you catch a win streak it takes you to a win goal you should have set before you started playing and cash out. Don't sit there keep playing it on and on, hit the goal and get out of there.
The pay on buying the 4 & 10 on bubble craps pays the exact change, unlike at the table where they round it and cheat you the change.
The calculation is bet x's 2 and you have to pay for the Vig (5% of the bet). So (Bet * 2) - (Bet * 5%):
($2 * 2) - ($2 * .05) = $3.9
($3 * 2) - ($3 * .05) = $5.85
and so on....
1 1.95
2 3.9
3 5.85
4 7.8
5 9.75
6 11.7
7 13.65
8 15.6
9 17.55
10 19.5
Have you figured out a good strategy on the 4 and 10 ? I thought about doing a Martingale Strategy using buying both numbers at the same time , the odds are the same as the 7
Do this on a field bet on craps. You have a chance of a 2x or 3x with the 2 and 12. There's a 44.4% chance of hitting a field number. You have a 47.3 chance of hitting red or black on roulette, but you dont get the 2x or 3x.
That's actually a pretty good point.
But isn't the house edge on the field bet close to 5%?
@@CasinoMatchmaker yes
Love the system, you recommend a starting bet of $30 and reducing or increasing by $5 Just to be sure. Do you mean your first spin is $30 ?? and then reducing or increasing by $5
Hey hey, yes exactly that!
Love it!! What is the best strategy to pair with this in your opinion? If any. Thx!
It's mainly even chance bets so there's not that many options.
I'm going to work out if it's beneficial to use with the 2 column system
@@CasinoMatchmaker sounds good thx!
I’m in Florida
No table roulette
Only slots
I guess this works on slots??
Your presentation is good but pls some videos with play roulette table with audio sir pls I am from india❤
I will try to include more. However this structure is the easiest and clearest way to explain the strategies
@@CasinoMatchmaker thank u sir for ans and good luck nice work ☺️
Stats, forecasting & live poker background here. I did like your maths & your script, very well explained!
But _(you knew it lol!)_ "wait for a streak b4 playing" isn't correct. Every spin is independent, streaks don't exist. Yes, we can agree that 6 reds in a row is 48% less likely than 5 in a row, but that misses the point. We are betting on 1 spin in an endless cycle, not "will a 6th red drop?"
In cash poker games there's also no "starting" or "ending" hand per se, it's all about volume overcoming variance in the long run. In poker, one deal is the same as any other & so 'luck' is equal, only skill differs in the long run. Anyway, cheers from Australia.
Cheers man!
Love this. Very clever
Very clever ha ha yes if you are stupid
hi what different on European roulette slot and European table? which one better?
I'm not sure I understand, European table is better I think
Hi, great content, thank you very much! How do you decide on which colour or else to bet?
Thanks for the kind words.
I would recommend waiting for a pattern of 3 play out.
For example 3 red numbers, then begin to bet on Black
@@CasinoMatchmaker OMG how can you actually spread such BS. Past results have ZERO influence on future ones. ZERO. ZERO. ZERO.
This is incredibly basic logic, waiting for patterns is as stupid as blowing on the dices before throwing them. This scammer knows it perfectly, he is selling you a lie and trying to lure you to his gambling site !
I tried this method on free site and got lots of fake profits. He know that it still is a 50/50 hes just trying to help, you don’t gotta take it so personally
Winning depends on an equal number of wins. Anyone playing Roulette knows that losing streak can last all day and longer until assets in the millions can be lost. It's called fat tail events in statistics.
Wow man thanks for letting us know that gambling isn’t a 100 percent win rate. Thanks for letting me know, i always thought i could bet and win every single time and steal their money
it would be nice if you have live examples
Hey thanks for the feedback I will be doing live examples in the future, just working on the set up and how to record them best
he cannot, cause this system does not work.
Worked pretty well for me
i'll try with 9$ and i'll tell u guys the results in the long run (table min bet is 0.05$ and max bet is 750$)
Let us know how it goes !
You always explained after 5winnings and 5 losings, would you just continue or restart on the start bet?
You could stop and take your profit or keep going on the start bet to try and make some more
I ran this system in the computer simulator. The reason it does not work is because you need to win 49% of the time to be profitable. The house edge stops that from happening in the long run, even on single zero wheels.
Hey Ron.
Can you please watch this video and let me know if you agree with the calculations?
It's my understanding that if you hit the amount of wins that you should hit.. You will make money using this system
ruclips.net/video/8docBGwgPSY/видео.htmlsi=UK4MDCo5nsIRZ4Yo
This is gold. Some may not see it but they probably shouldnt be playing.
It really is isn't it.
A really clever strategy that tilts the edge towards the player
@@CasinoMatchmaker No its doesn't tilt the edge towards the player, you lying pos. You admitted it yourself in another comment, every bet has a negative expected return, no matter the betting size or pattern.
Have u covered the Romanovski ? And the odds on losses multiple times?
Would this work with running it on a ploppy 3-2 system?
That's an interesting concept.
But we would need to keep our 3-2 ratio.
So if we increased our even chance bet using this system then we need to increase the column bet as well to stay with the ratio.
Does that make sense?
800 dollar bankroll -- start with 4 - loose and bet 6 -- loose bet 8 -- loose bet 10 -- win next bet 8 --- win next bet 6 -- loose nb 8 -- win nb 6 -- win nb 4 and so on ...... after 50 dollar won you start with 4 dollar again --- see how it works !!!
Watch this video you will see how good it can be...ruclips.net/video/tZ19-83ousE/видео.html
Tried this tonight - I set a target, and walked with 82% gain.
are you placing your $30 on 1 of the three 12's? and will this work on a 0/00 table? thanks!
'(Western Canada)
This is for even money bets. (red or black)
Don't play at a table with 00!
Awsome video❤
Thank you !
So i bet 10 starting and win 10 do you just bet again 10 and wait till a loss to bet 12 and if loss after that you go to 14 ???? Explain more please
Yea that's exactly right.
But don't start at the minimum bet.
You won't take advantage of your winning streaks.
You need to be able to lower your bet each time you win, otherwise it doesn't work as well
@casinomatchmaker how can i do the strategy on the dozens ? its difficult for me to do the math 😩
I'm not sure it works on dozens.
Have you tried the Fibonacci system on dozens instead? That's a brilliant system
so do we stop at 5 wins 5 losses or can we keep playing? WHen do we stop?
I will exploring this question in an upcoming video.
It would depend on your starting balance but I would say stop at about 30% profit
Okay becuase I plan on doing the $30 starting hands with $5 demom at a $5 or $10 table@@CasinoMatchmaker
I didn't understand exactly if you could explain it to me better step by step I would be grateful, thank you
You wanna start at a 10 dollar minimum table and bet 30 dollars. If you lose you increase your bet by 5 and if you lose you decrease your bet by 5. You do this until your ready to leave and happy with your profit. Leave after you lose all your money which rarely happens but is still possible, or you leave once you win on the minimum bet. The system makes it so if you win and lose 50/50 you still make profit. After you win on 10 you can can walk away or restart at 30
I meant to say you increase your bet when you lose and decrease your bet win you win
Just did this strat, £600 bankroll £30 starter bet. Got to £75 up, then had 13 loses in a row !!!
Do you keep the bet on the same outside even money spot the whole time?
I personally would, but that's your call
The waiting for a streak to have passed doesn't work. The chance of X spins being red, after already having landed on red Y times, is the exact same as if the previous spin was black or 0. Individual spins don't affect other spins.
That is not entirely true. It is true that each individual spin has the same odds. But it is also true that there are mathematical probabilities of sequences within a number of spins. This is the same with flipping a coin. The chances of getting heads or tales is 50% every time. But the chances of getting the same side of the coin in a row in sequence decreases per addition. In other words, the odds of individual spins is a separate odds than sequences of spins. Probability is never a guarantee though.
what was the best strategy for black/red colour 15 time coming in a row
This strategy would mean you would lose far less money than the martingale system
Why stay at that session for that long? Quit the session after 5 loses in a row. Start a new session and continue where you left off after quitting the losing session. You still my lose but at least you have a way better chance at recouping your loses and making a profit by quitting losing streaks before they get way out of hand.
The fact that you mentioned waiting on a streak and suggesting that means anything in a game where each result is independent takes credit away from anything else you’d suggest.
This is referring to the fact that you would be 5 steps into the sequence, instead you can enter on step 1.
I've not been clear on the point I was trying to make in this part of the video.
Apologies
@@CasinoMatchmaker Not been clear ? You said false and dumb information and tried to sell it as strategy for a game that cannot be beaten.
@@askforalawyer7181 Hold the phone. He is offering information on how to do better at a table game and how to properly implement strategies. You can take or leave his suggestions. He makes it clear that there is not guaranteed win. Why are you watching videos about gambling if you are bitter about it?
10 loss
12 loss
Bet 25 win = loss 22 win 25= +3
Next spin double down to 10. Loss
Double up. You have to double uo. But you make decisions as you go.
The problem with the system is obvious. The zero and double zero ensure that you'll lose more than you win.
Hey Hey.
Yes the Zero means you will lose more spins, but with this strategy, even if you win only 48 out of 100 spins you would make money
Increasing bets on losses will help you live on the street….
The only bet strategy that will work consistently is a positive bet progression…..ALL negative bet progressions will eventually get you to table max and you’ll lose your bankroll …it’s just a matter of time….
Which positive progression system do you like?
I'm a big fan of Oscars grind
how about if the table is $25 min. ?
Edge..no chance..Real money changes everything.
All casino games have an edge against any gambler. You can not ever have the edge over the casino.
Does this still have good odds if ti is 0, 00?
Still works pretty good but it's much better on single zero
What if RED COMES IN 17 times in a row? Can you dig yourself out of that????
Follow winning
It's going to be very difficult to get out of that one
Follow the winner
@@robertmorris3559 Follow the winner ? Are you guys serious ? Get help, you have an addiction issue, it's never to late to realize it and get into recovery.
It's a pretty good system, but I think Fibonacci is consistently better.
I like recovering losses
Theory looks so simple. Try putting it in practical n u will know d real result. Always follow d banker bcos u can never beat d casino.
It requires some luck as well. But it is an advantageous way to play
Hi, at 7:00 why did you bet $20 on the winning side while only betting $10 on the losing side? What would the next bet be if you won $10 on the winning side, $8 ?
Hello.
I ran the example of losing 5 in a row first so that would be.. 10,12,14,16,18 and because I lost the next bet would be 20... Which I then won
can you make a video about Drakes Roulette strategy please??
I will do some research. I'm not too familiar with it
That last example of $10 would have played out +10,+8,+6,-4,-6,-8,-10,+12,-10,+12 = +10 dollar profit. If you wait for any even money bet to come out 3 times in a row and red does, do you then bet black once or keep betting black until you win?
I would personally play it until I win.
Then stop and look at the other even chance bets (Even/odd or high/low)
Does this work on dozens too?
It could potentially but you have less chance of winning your dozens.
Tomorrow's video covers the best betting strategy on dozens !
@@CasinoMatchmaker thank you so much!
This is one of the few vids where the zero and double zero aren't mentioned. These are not 50/50 chance bets.
It stated the longer u play this the better your profits but thats not true. The casino has the long game as the longer u play the more the house edge takes hold. U start at 30 and win. Walk away 30 bucks ahead and count yourself lucky.
It's interesting for sure but I'd say use it in blackjack where the house edge is lower. As long as u know basic strategy.
Interesting that you say that.
I used it playing Blackjack and it worked like a charm.
I've been playing a modified version of this strategy for years consistently walking away with profits. You really need to wait for a pattern to get the best results
Nice work!
How do you modify it?
@@CasinoMatchmaker I look for certain patterns. Like you mentioned in the video, I usually wait for 3 of the same before placing an initial bet, but not necessarily 3, sometimes 2 and other times 4, I do that by looking at the last 10 spins. I also have a maximum that I won't increase over and I never go under my initial bet, so I have a minimum also. Most of the time, after spotting my pattern, my initial bet or second bet bring me in profit, so I'm out of that series of bets and wait for another pattern before I place another bet again. So very often I won't bet on anything as I don't have a pattern and I have already made profit from my last basket/series of bets. I also will bet on any of the combinations that pay out 1 for 1. (Red/Black)... (Odd/Even) ... (1-18/19-36) I don't mind as long as I see a pattern I like. I also will only play the European tables never a double zero table. The key is to be patient, you really shouldn't want to be in with a bet on every spin. A bit hard to explain it all but it's something that I personally understand and mathematically makes sense. It's all about probabilities and even though each spin is 50/50 to be red or black (minus the green) the chances of 5 red or 5 black numbers in a row are quite low and of course from time to time you'll get even more, but streaks of one colour is eventually followed by a streak of the other color.
@@lazziebardakos2956 The table can be choppy also (rbbrbrrbrbrr) or zig zag (rbrbrbrbrbrbr).
Check out the roulette jackpot channel. It's the best
In theory, i could play with a friend. I play black and friend plays red. Using this strategy, we would both be ahead?
I just tried this for an 1.5 hours and i am up $95. Started betting at $10 (moved $2 each win/loss) and ended betting at $14. Still up $95
Oh wow that's a very interesting concept.
As long as there were no exceptionally long runs of a single colour to lose your bankrol, I think you'd both be in profit
I've just come across a strategy that you can play with a friend to improve your chances of winning.
I'll be doing some more research and publish it in the coming weeks
No roulette betting system will ever work in the long run. You will lose 19 out of 37 times and win 18 out of 37 times, resulting in an expected loss of 2.7% for every bet. This system here has a flaw. Chance of winning in not the same as chance of losing. increasing a bet with an increment will lead to incremented bet sizes, but not to positive EV. You will bust most of the times.
@@francoiskeulen
I should have included this in the video but I only ran the calculations after someone pointed it out in the comments.
this system allows you to make money, even when losing more bets than you win. Let me explain...
Let's say we started with our $10 bet and lost 48 bets in a row.
We would bet 10,12,14 all the way up to 104. Total all those bets together that = 2,736
Then we win 48 in a row.
We would start at 106, 104, 102 and all this would bring us all the way down to betting 12.
Total all of this together = 2,832.
So after winning and losing 48 bets we are $96 dollars in profit.
If we lose our next 4 bets following our system it would be 10,12,14,16 which = 52.
Take this 52 away from our $96 profit and we have a final profit of $44.
This is a situation where we lose 52% of our bets
@@CasinoMatchmaker I have used you betting system to run a couple of simulations. Every 37 rounds the bet goes up one increment (on average) and in the long run, you either go bust (largest probability) or you win big (smaller probability) Expected result is negative.
LOL. Developed by a mathematician so it is better. That is so funny. I am a HS dropout and figured this out all by myself long before seeing this. Had no idea until today that is was a system already being used. I am also amazed by how many did not know this already as it is the simplest wagering system around. I certainly hope they know it has a serious flaw that pops up in the higher wagers.
The problem with using this system is that casinos only give you single denomination chips.
The big question is, HOW YOU CHOOSE A BET WITH EQUAL WINNING AND LOSING? If you lose 10 times and win only 2 times, you will walk out losing 😅
Without a doubt!
I can't find a system that will allow you to win even when you making losing bets
Follow the winner.
Check out the roulette jackpot channel. It's the best
Nope, doesn't work. Tested on simulator with $2000 to start and bet $100 broken into 4 $25 units. Lost it all quick.
The narrator said at least broken down 6 times. So that would be 15 or 16 dollars you start with. Also, use a stop loss of a certain amount of money and if you lose 5 times in a row, quit the session and start a new session betting where you left off at the losing session.
@@angravante Alright, I'm trying this and seeming to have better luck. So to keep the math simple: I start with $2000 and am using $100 broken down less than 6 times for $15 units. If I lose 5 times in a row and my bet is up to $75, change to $10 units until I get back into profit. Is that close enough to what you're suggesting?
@@thriftynick27 That sounds good but I would quit that losing session and start a new session at a new table or new online table. If you are starting at $100 and lose 5 bets in a row, your next new session bet at the new table would be $190 and if that wins, next bet would be $175. You could go to adding or subtracting $10 but you would have to win more times than you lose in a less than 50/50 game. I would have at least $5000 total for this overall. I am interested in your results, thank you.
The system makes math sense until you add 0/00. If 0/00 comes up 1 in 40 spins you are likely a small winner, 1 in 20 times a small loser. It's still luck against a house edge.
Hello.
Yes the Zero gives the house a slight edge.
Check out this game using the system and you will see even with a small house edge you can make money from this system..
ruclips.net/video/tZ19-83ousE/видео.html
I can bet you 100% you will lose if you play this way. If you don’t play don’t try to teach people.
Just pure crap. I challenge you to post a online play with real money and consistently win. Which you can never do.
Some mothers have them 😂
Try it and see for yourself
It is a hell of a lot better than any martingale system. You just have to have a stop loss and if you lose a certain amount of times , quit that session and start a new one and continue where you left off at the last session.
Sir, the best I hv seen. losses few thousand dollar due to playing in wrong technic.
Hope this helps for future games !
You lost because you cannot win, the odds are EV- no matter what you do.
You will not win 5 consecutive bets often enough to overcome your losses….Your bets will climb so high ghat you’ll never get back to your start amount….
Why is that if you are playing even chance bets?
I've seen this system suggested for black Jack before too, main thing i wonder is, how do you modify it to adjust for doubles/splits?
Yea it's very good for Blackjack as well.
If you win a double, then you count it as 2 bets won. so you move down the sequence twice.
Same if you lose, then you move up the system twice
@@CasinoMatchmaker dont you get paid double for a black jack seems like that in it self would make you profitable if you were at least wining 47% of your hands
If you double down or you split your pairs, just go down two unitd when you win and go up two units when you lose. It’s just an up-and-down situation with the the goal of reaching zero
@@JohnnyCaruso depending on the table you get paid either 6:5 or 3:2 for a blackjack but not 2:1
i have done some simulations and found that this is not going to work in the long run
What about the same system but on this game..
ruclips.net/video/tZ19-83ousE/видео.html
modified martingale is better
What is modified Martingale?
I started at $10 bets and now im at $82 when do i get back down to $10 ....
You mean your bet is $82? Or your profit is $82?
What are you betting on
What's the point with bonuses when you have an impossible rollover to achieve !! They give you $75 to ur $25 =$100 with a 35× rollover meaning you have to wager $3500 to be able to start winning . Those odds are not in ur favor. Screw the bonuses unless your new and want to practice ?
It's extra money to play with, there's absolutely no harm in taking the extra money.
35x is pretty easy to complete on Roulette, especially if you're using a smart betting strategy.
I'd personally always take a good bonus, I can't see any downside to it
What happens if you are on a loosing streak, you will be betting higher n higher bets which will be hard to recover
Yes you are right.
Unfortunately if you hit a long losing streak there's nothing that can stop you losing money
Never bet on the same Color, Odd/Even or High/Low. Change them regularly. You can win with any system out there if you can pick the right winning numbers each time.
@@kentuckwhite6701Yeah, and then when there is a streak of one color or even or low numbers, you still have a losing streak.
Why with any game and any system you have a stop loss, whether x amount of y hits in a row like 7 reds in a row or say to yourself I’m gonna lose $100 before I stop or take a break, and wait for the streak to end. Cuz it will end, eventually.
@@HamptonsStreetDoc I don't have stop losses, I don't believe in using them, and I never have used them.
It will be better in baccarat no ?
It is good for Baccarat.
This is the best game I've found to use this system...ruclips.net/video/tZ19-83ousE/видео.html
@@CasinoMatchmaker On baccarat it is live so maybe more safe ?
Tried this method for a while playing bj and even tho i lost a lot i still gained money and doubled it. With this method if you were to play 12 hands 6 you win and 6 you lose you still are up a descent amount
Exactly my friend!
I also love this on Blackjack.
I've just found a game at a blockchain casino that makes this strategy a fantastic money maker.
I'll be posting the video soon so make sure to check back
Okay, i used your advice on betting 30 dollars on a 10 dollar minimum table just pretending on a for fun online game. I ended up doing ur method but once i won on the minimum bet i would just go back to my starting bet of 30, did this for 100 hands and made a total of 1000 just going in with 300. That comes out to about an average profit of 10 dollar per hand. I tried doing a ton of other roulette methods and they never worked. This is probably the best method i have come across so far. Unfortunately i am not able to bet because of my age but i got curious of what the best method was after trying to beat my family on the roulette table. I told my dad about this and the next time he goes hes gonna try it out. I thought 300 dollars was just the right amount of money. My parents end up going with 100-300 on nights out with my extended family and most of the time end up losing it so even if it doesn’t work it won’t really mean anything. I was wondering what the best way to play bj is tho. Through machines or on a table.
Don’t really know why people are hating on this method. Obviously theres still risk but you make it so that even if you win half and lose half you make money. I like it with bj tho because i increase my odds of winning just of experience and knowledge of the game. And every once in a while when you get a bj you get even more money. Its way better than martingale cause it can stack up pretty quickly
If you hit a winning streak and minimize your win…
That's why I recommend not starting at the minimum bet
@@CasinoMatchmakerthanks for the video. Would u please do a video using a similar progression when playing 2 dozen or 2 columns for your subscribers all over the world. Thanks 👍.