Это видео недоступно.
Сожалеем об этом.
Rare speech by EU's Deputy Brexit negotiator on UK talks
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 28 янв 2019
- Sabine Weyand, the EU's Deputy Brexit negotiator, gives her thoughts in a panel discussion on the Irish backstop, Theresa May's Brexit deal and the EU's future relationship with the UK.
(Subscribe: bit.ly/C4_News_Subscribe)
-------
Watch more of our explainer series here - ruclips.net/user/playlist?list...
Get more news at our site - www.channel4.com/news/
Follow us:
Facebook - / channel4news
Twitter - / channel4news
She is one of the famous "unelected bureaucrats" that europhobs talk about. Now i understand why they are scared of them. Thank god she's on the EU side of the negotiation table :- )
It is the clearest, cleverest and most well-argued explanation I have heard about Brexit. Thank you Mrs. Sabine Weyand.
@Aden-AUA-Hauer Beide Dinge sind kohärent
Very glad we in the EU have these multi-lingual (she's German) and extremely intelligent negotiators. Look at how conversational, witty and at ease someone can be, talking about such complex issues. Please do more interviews Sabine!
Paul Victor I agree, I was very impressed with her language skills. I can see why she was the lead negotiator.
Paul Victor I don’t trust the Germans. At all. She looks like she would be a dictator in the future. She is saying what by how much Theresa May was defeated but she is not saying about how the Referendum was won by over a million votes. Some people are very good talkers so do not let that fool you. She obviously is only saying what she have already heard the the heads of have already said. It is not hard to repeat what has already been said. EU this was disgust ling time ago. The back stop wS Orchestrated to keep Britain side the Customer Union. We already know that. The N Ireland Varadkar was laid two years ago to go along with the Orchestrated backstop to keep Britain in a straight Jacket in the Customs Union. Some people are too thick and blond to see what have been happening. None if this is true. There is no need for a hard border. This is the EU putting obstacles in the way of Britain leaving the EU. They are terrified of Britain trading better than them as we used to be the best in Europe. They even coned Member States by giving all their powers and Laws over to the German run EU. Then the coned them into handing over their Army’s what stupid fools. And Theresa May is useless. Now all Member States are sitting duck with no defense because they are under German control. They have no defense if Germany is commanding and controlling all the Army’s from Member States. No solder will be able to refuse a German order or they will be in prisoned or shot. This was Hitlers dream that he was talking about before WW2 ended. Angela Merkel done it different from Hitler. She spin her evil web and invited European countries into her web of evil destruction by using the Euro too. Taking Member States Sovereignty away. Taking all their Laws away. Taking their House Of Commons away witch would end up as nothing.
@@MarjorieMay-kc6ls Is this a joke?
Paul Victor -German you say, it Seems she forgot her Gestapo uniform and whip!☠️
@@MarjorieMay-kc6ls Germany and China shall rule the world! Lol
No wonder Westminister is in a mess, this is one savvy and competent negotiator. Respect.
That's the biggest mystery in all of this - at least to me... Brexiteers claim they would be better off without the EU and could negotiate better deals on their own - and at the same time they claim the EU has pulled a fast one on the UK. What is it, lads? Are you or are you not better at negotiations than the EU? Can't be both...
Westminster, not Westminister - no wonder you follow her like a EU sheep. Baa!
@@austenj4539 You know... I don't think myself a sheep, but if you must know: I'd rather be a happy, well-fed sheep than be the wolf that's shot on sight :)
@me hee Well, yes... obviously there are threats that the UK could make that would bring the EU back to the table and open the negotiations back up. For example, I can't imagine the 27 standing firm together if the UK would threaten to share secret information gained from the cooperating secret services over the last decades with foreign nations like Russia or China. However, the UK needs to be prepared for the backlash. If the UK "pushes hard enough" (as you put it), simple physics will tell us that there is an equal and opposite force to push back on the UK.
The EU has time and time again, almost stunningly unanimous, repeated their steady opinion to NOT change the deal that was reached between all 28 members during a long and hard negotation process. It is absolutely clear, that it would be vehemently AGAINST the wishes of the 27 remaining members to even talk about anything, let alone change any part of the legally binding bits of the agreement. So if they are forced to do it by some force from the UK, the UK can expect their friendly standing with the 27 EU members and the EU itself to rapidly deteriorate...
@@QemeH Theresa the appeaser thought she could smooth over both sides of the argument
Who offers £39bn as a starting point🤔 a remainer
A grown up speaks about the EU-UK negotiations. Our government was outclassed.
It's not even about outclassing. At least from the EU perspective. As she said the EU wants the closest relationship with the UK as possible (therefore mostly limited by the UK's wishes to distance itself from the EU and demands not balanced by any reasonable offers). To me, at least, it seems this was never a fight between the EU and the UK. It's an internal fight within the UK.
Take the backstop. It makes sense for the EU to back the Republic in its desire for a soft border with Northern Ireland. The UK could of course have fought for a hard border. Even if they did the negotiators didn't end up with that. Whatever shape the soft border takes - the backstop is really more of a safety measure in case the two parties fail to make a deal (a deal which would have to include some sort of non-hard border in Ireland, I assume).
It very much feels to me that while, yes, there are differences of opinion and preferences but that the EU has been looking to actually make a deal whereas the UK hasn't (been able to), mainly because of internal politics. And yes, as someone from elsewhere in the EU I would favour the UK remaining but the last months I have mosly been thinking that Westminster has severe issues getting on track. Stay or leave, you choose but c'mon.
@@LyricalDJ Well stated. As an amused observer from the southern hemisphere, I'm tired of the UK's petulance.
LyricalDJ I actually think that the uk was one of the main factor which prevented european integration so i m not sad they leave
I've been watching C4 coverage of Brexit for months now. This woman just made me understand more about the Brexit deal than all the MPs (those for and against it) C4 has had over for interviews
@dean coyle GTFO with that reactionary BS
The EU allows food waste
@@veggie42 Havent you been living in the UK? Every supermarket wastes plenty of food everyday. And, well, could you explain me the correlation between food waste and this video,pls?
@@davidmoya1008 About No deal fears of supermarket shortages it said on news earlier
@@veggie42 no deal fears on food shortages simply reflects the FACTS that we import approximately 46% of our food staples including fruit and veg. Facts from DEFRA.
A fab Lady. Competent, restrained and self-disciplined and extremely well spoken and intelligent. And She looks fine too. I don't for a moment understand the vacuous and flatulent comments by some empty headed Brits on Her looks.... She looks fine and She has substance in spades. Poor England.....
"uninhibited by any knowledge of the withdrawal agreement" genius. :D It's not just the British that employ irony!
It is a perfect example of typical German humour, no?
I nearly fell off my chair hearing that. Quite brilliant, especially since she's making jokes in what, to her, is a foreign language.
An irony onto itself that she's using it to speak about the brits :P
I've never heard a more diplomatic way to say "Maybe you blockheads should read the damn document before you vote on it!""
@@inotterwords6115 those very words were on the front cover .... but who needs to read the instructions when u know it all ... by the age of 6 in most of their cases
She is extremely well spoken considering that English is not her native language. She is clear, and shows great intelligence in this speech. I am impressed! 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
This can be expected from a citizen of the European Union. Today I watched the stream from the British parliament, it was more like a parliamentary debate from the Middle Ages than from the 2019.
Slobodan Petrovic I have no problem with somebody competent, intelligent, and hardworking to be well paid.
@Slobodan Petrovic typical response from someone complaining with someone else opinions, not their own . I suggest you find out for yourself why she is paid so much. if reward for someone competent and intelligent hurts you so much , I suggest you leave your jealously at home and dedicate time to relish all your frustrations with proper education and facts... but I guess that would be not only difficult but virtually impossible and unfair for you , sir. back to the draw .
How many English can speak other languages? Not many
@Aden-AUA-Hauer Hat die die NPD Parteizentrale Magdeburg wieder die Tür zum Neo-Nazi Keller offen gelassen? Dir wurde gesagt du sollst nichts im Internet posten, das bringt das völkische Bild deiner Partei ins wanken...
Compare this clear headed analysis and full grip on the facts with any UK politician or bureaucrats opining various fantasies.
Oh yes meticulous analysis, the Nazi were also very meticulous and they almost took over the world.
@@cymoonrbacpro9426 argument lost
I second that. EU officials have not often volunteered commentary on the Brexit mess, but when they do, they know what they are talking about. The UK side seems unable to stop asking for what has been ruled out, as if they can get it by dint of persistence. Looks like they are playing it like a game of chicken.
Good point.
@@cymoonrbacpro9426 oh no, lets not be happy about being trying to meticulous when it comes to very important thing
As an Irish citizen, I would like to express my profound gratitude to Ms Sabine Weyand for her level-headedness, professionalism, and massive competence.
Every time she, or M. Michel Barnier, make a public statement, it validates our EU membership.
She is a great example of commonsense, education and raw trained intelligence. A modern European.
And every time I see a British MP being interviewed it validates the war of independence
As a half-Irish German I really wish you guys all the very best from my heart. You've been putting up with British plundering for centuries and it's time it finished. The "Spiegel" this week (Issue 5/2019) includes a heartfelt leader from Markus Feldenkirchen that Ireland should have a referendum for reunification. The British have historically screwed up their chances for holding on to Ulster. Get rid of them.
yes indeed it was explained to us all very clearly ........they could have put a tv above the speakers chair in the commons got him to order for the doors to be shut..... and the mps then called to order , and have them sit and listen and learn ...... he would have to pause no doubt a few times to restore order .....it would have done them no harm to be educated ... just a bit !!!!
Mr Barnier stated that the Backstop was a Red Herring created by the EU to stop the UK leaving the EU.
Concise, precise and straight to the point. How very German of her! Well done, Sabine! What a stark contrast to Theresa May!
Alec104 Well I agree, Teresa May is Arthur Neville Chamberlain, and Sabine is Hitler!
Substance trumps Bluster in most cases when the conversation is about money... (wait, I see what I have done there...)
Alec10
To summarize: "We gave you what you wanted and now you're being all whiney about it."
Theresa May has been back several times and written letters about the Backstop so brushing it aside as 'your idea' 'what you wanted' is clap trap.
no we just want out, theres nothing whiney about that
@@mc2594 then agree on the backstop, build your tech solution's in two years, and you are done. Or leave with no deal here and now.
There is zero chance anybody would trust the UK to deliver what they promised, if they spend 2 years negotiating a deal which does not have parliamentary support.
@@tomrawley6549 those with no fucking idea just want out. The ones who have never looked properly at the consequences.
@@mc2594 Teresa May is trying to keep her unstable party together. She knew the deal would fail horribly again so she surrendered it to her Brexiteers.
Which sums up the incompetent Tory government, fail every time and blame someone else.
The Brexiteers will have real contempt for this lady. She is intelligent, articulate, reassuring confident. No waffle or bluster or convoluted political babble.
Oh! and she is German. Which means now they'll really despise her.
Good luck to her!
Amazingly simple and full of FACTS, she should talk at the House of Commons.
No she shouldn't. Those people behave like children when someone is speaking that they don't like.
She would be shouted down by a pack of angry children, and laughed at in the most disrespectful way. As Wobin Williams said "the house of commons is like Congress with a two shot minimum"
Why? I wish she would tell the UK to stop wasting food
@@veggie42 Wasting food? Get yourself educated on just how much the EU as a whole wastes on food, because of THEIR laws.
@@Danny-is5if No it's not necessarily I'm referring to people putting unwanted food on plates not telling people what they are getting,letting people choose if they want salad for example and too much on people's plates. That's not EU laws
what a truly "rare" speech - unmatched by anything I have heard in the House so far
That's because she actually studied what she's doing. Most politicians aren't even academics anymore, let alone professionals in whatever field they claim to be an expert in. Even the traditional "career politian" (which back in the days meant that you studied law and had a passion for debates, making you at least an expert in how to write a law if not on the topic itself) is going extinct.
Very clear and well explained and not in her native tongue, impressive.
I am not sure the UK MPs and government are equiped with dealing intellectually with so much clarity and logic... Nigel, Boris and co look like clowns in comparison
I voted remain because I knew our politicians were just not competent enough to do this or understand what they were doing
xoloth
Clowns elect clowns.
Clowns voted in a referendum.
Clowns know nothing about anything except making faces and meaningless sounds.
xoloth absolutely. God help us. ‼️
Inspector Kommisar Perhaps this is the inevitable Consequence for UK as an empire, it has been relegated to what happens to all empires in history but These cowards are just accelerating the process. One thing for sure, European Union is a wicked Empire in the making!
Massive Ferguson
Oh boy you are a Massively angry individual.
I hope you feel much better now you have unloaded
Your pointless invective.
Have a nice day. 🍁
Amazing, the difference between Sabina (reason) and many UK politicians (Jingoism ).
This woman is so clear and understandable its fantastic.
Next time she will be on the show, she's probably going to tell in a clear and understandable way how the "EU" is going to reform.. and how fantastic it will be. These people can't be trusted, vote down the EU!
yeah fantastic, fantastic that she is part of a team that is trying to screw us, grow up
@@tomrawley6549
Is she?
May shaped most of the Deal with her interests and the conflicting promises she had given to different people, which are obviously impossible to hold.
The EU played along quite nicely.
Is there any alternative to the backstop for having an open Northern Ireland / Ireland border you have in mind?
No? Didn't think so.
Now stop villifying the EU and start to realize that what brexiteer promised you is actually impossible and was misleading.
@@Minecraftrok999 are you answering your own questions now, very clever, not,the backstop is just a red herring, if you dont know that then i cant help you, i would advise though that you get yourself better educated
@@tomrawley6549
I presupposed you'd have no answer, if you do, feel free to tell me, I'd be genuinely surprised.
I believe I'm educated enough in British politics considering that I'm not from there, but whatever, I can't even single out why you would believe I needed more education given my comment above does not state any falsehoods. Sure it might be a bit over the top and oversimplified, but keep in mind this is a RUclips comment section, not a scientific discussion.
It is really nice to hear the facts set out chapter and verse.. Well done Sabine Weyland.
The EU thinks it's time so bring an adult into the room.
Yes, Thelma from Scooby Doo has entered the fray.
@me hee well u have plenty of bigoted brits who dislike the germans ........it all balances out .......
@@georgedoorley5628 She must have that impending German recession in the back of her mind and the UK not having to pay that 39 billion when the EU 'hopefully' refuses to negotiate further. Bring on that no-deal Brexit thanks :)
@@0penminds Yes because that will be great for your economy.....
and who might that be ?
lol, she's using facts, analyses and reason. No wonder the HoC aka House of Chaos won't agree with her.
@@turquoiseowl No, her argument was that the UK hasn't shown a viable concept for a smart border yet and it's on them to do so, not on the EU.
That paper you linked is a very basic look at the concept and certainly not a detailed plan of action. Also I'm no expert, but it seems to me like it would still violate the good friday agreement. That's less of a problem for the EU than it is a problem for the UK. Which is probably why the backstop was the idea of the UK government...
@@turquoiseowl 1. Sabine Weyand jsut said it was the UK's idea
2. Theresa May never siad it wasn't her idea. For a politician, that's an admission.
3. The people who came up with the word "brexit" can't come up with "backstop"? Please.
@@turquoiseowl Listen to the video again.
Also so many americans in the EU... way more likely that they came up with that term than the brits. Your logic is impeccable! /s
Opinion from South of Equator: The perceived difference between EU negotiators and their UK counterparts is that first ones have profound technical knowledge about the ground they are moving on. While in the UK those who are in charge of negotiations have just prestige. They do not really know about what they are talking about, they barely scratch the surface of the underlying problems. In fact it should be recognized that the UK has indeed a few serious human resources to advise the negotiations with the EU (Sir Ivan Rogers, Dr. Richard North, etc) but they are continually and completely ignored by those who have prestige, power and most of the media which prioritizes easygoing biff bam politics. It seems quite clear that most of those in charge of negotiations on the UK side, including MPs, have learned almost nothing about the Brexit complexities since the referendum in 2016. So in the middle of the huge mess they’ve created for themselves, each is defending its own interest, within its own agenda. There is no real national interest at stake for them. Closing perception: while the EU considers Brexit as being the art of adjusting rights and obligations so not to jeopardize internal EU and international commerce, the UK still plays all this as it were a poker game, hoping to win by having the EU blinking first at the last minute of the eleventh hour.
Great commemt
I expect that the UK civil servants doing all the real work away from the cameras are pretty clued up about it all. Unfortunately it is their political masters who make the decisions.
@@adriancarlton-oatley9736 - in general I would agree. However, we have to remember that the UK has no recent experience...I mean nothing for the last 40 years. That must have hurt.
@@stephenconway2468 I hope people considered this when they were promised speedy and favourable Free Trade Agreements with 50 or more potential trade partners possibly being negotiated and closed at the same time.
@@Lufthansifyer it will be a steep and costly learning curve for tham
This lady, Sabine Weyand is so charming and frankly quite a refreshment after getting used to politicians talking a lot but saying nothing. She's so well spoken but she doesn’t sugar coat. If only she’d appeared a lot earlier. Btw, I’m utterly appalled by people that didn’t bother to listen to what she said, but instead try to have fun with her clothing style. Decades long of anti-intellectualism has really taken its toll, hasn’t it? Sad.
Ramo Chai The same thing was said of Hitler, he’s so charming and charismatic.
Cymoon RBACpro , yeah because somebody who happens to be a German national acted against your interests so they have to be a Nazi.
Grow up ffs. You’re being childish and utterly disrespectful to the ones who lost their lives in Holocasut. Show some respect.
@@cymoonrbacpro9426 You know Hitler was austrian, right? I guess you probably didn't know that...
@@4203105 and?
Ramo Chai do you
Why aren't British politicians as articulate and coherent as she is when it comes to either what they have in front of them or, especially, what they want? Surely graduates of private schools and Oxbridge know better than snotty comments and dumb trumpian slogans...
The Britons are uniquely handicapped by a fabled tradition of worship for Churchillian rhetoric of emotional appeal. They prefer to expound on grand "principles" to stir the heart than to exercise reason to solve practical problems.
@bogdan475 There is no shortage of British politicians who are as articulate, although not necessarily in a foreign language. She is a technocrat, not a politician: that gives her the ability to be frank, clear, and thorough. This is a luxury not afforded to elected politicians, be they from Westminster or from elsewhere..
That's why they hate EU commission members xD
She is not a politician that is why.
That and that there only in it for there own personal political gains and will happily stab each on there in the back to stuck it to the next in line.
One side is talking with fact, other side is just shouting - no deal, deal, order, election and blah blah blah! Lol
Oh yes, but I do enjoy it when the children get boisterous close to their nap time, and the speaker of the creche shouts Orderrrrrr, orderrrrrr... bums down, legs crossed, fingers on lips!
I find their antics a handy distraction that keeps me from looking out of the window as the whole jolly school-bus drives off the cliff : )
Be thankful that nobody on this side of the channel has yet resorted to speaking facts and being sensible... the last thing we want is a panic.
What an intelligent, clearly spoken person.
John Olcott
Yes, it feels good to hear someone who’s articulate and intelligent.
@John Stocker it's 'you're'. Barely literate brexit pleb
@@applecrumble8424 And there we are, the typical condescending attitude of the remainer.
You must be a EU sheep. Baa!
@Vic Denton oh OK, so you don't remember the signing of the Maastrict treaty or the Lisbon treaty? I do. Of course, that matters not jot does it. We've been lied to about the European project, but don't worry, if we stay in, there will be a European army, which were we're told there wouldn't be, there'll be more control coming down the line, BUT that's OK as long as the economy is OK. Sell your soul, and be controlled, but even my European friends know that the eu isn't the answer
Wow it’s pretty amazing how straightforward facts presented in a logical manner is such a revelation when it comes to this debate.
It’s almost as if one side actually knows how to govern.
One thing I would add to everybody praising Sabine and criticizing her UK counterparts - UK had a very intelligent and level headed negotiator in the person of Sir Ivan Rodgers who can be seen in the background when the camera pans away. The problem was he resigned because none of his messages of reason and common sense were landing with the British government.
Interesting to hear that the British negotiators wanted a backstop they are now opposing 🤔
Totally agree - that statement was shocking to me! She states that the UK was driving the negotiation from their end, and the EU effectively agreed to May's demands. Since May's deal was overwhelmingly defeated by the house of commons, PM May and the government, according to this negotiator's statements, have mis-characterized the negotiations as being driven by the EU, and forcing this on the UK as the only deal possible.
It's because the UK is constantly being fed lies about how the evil EU is purposely screwing us and holding us hostage to their demands.
Not necessarily: The PM may have instructed them to get a backstop, despite what they personally would prefer.
Again very conflicting reports here, on the one hand it has been stated that the EU helped PM May to draft her plan, and yet here we have the statement that it was our own government that wanted the backstop, i cannot comment as to which is true or accurate, but it is clear that someone is wrong and other agendas are being followed than the ones that should be at the top of the list, the British voters did not ask for or want any deals or backstops until after we had left the EU, and should not have to take responsibility for this problem, i would be the first to admit that Mays handling of Brexit has been very bad, she has in effect being trying to serve more than one master, something a PM should never even consider let alone do, but this to be fair has been at least some insistence of the EU, maybe if this lady had been in charge of negotiations instead of Mr Barnier who did not want to compromise in anyway, preferring to peacock how strong he could be at punishing the UK, Mr Tusk making snide and unprofessional comments online about cherrys, Mr Junker smiling to Mrs Mays face whilst going onto back stab her in the most ignorant and undignified manner a politician possibley could, and Mr Verhofstat jumping up and down in a petulant hissy fit ranting away like a demented little Goebbles demanding everyone's sovereignty and proclaiming the might if the NEW empire that can not be stopped by anyone, things might have been much smoother, we all know in our hearts that the UK will be trading with the EU and vice verse, what we have seen is a rather silly emotional response from the French and Belgium poloticians, who like to call the British names and accuse us of all the sins of the world since time immemorial, here we see the German approach, calm, level headed, unemotional, efficient, we may not agree on all things but the UK can deal with them as we share common ground on these points at least, the UK i admit needs desperately to reboot its political system as it has been corrupted since the time of Blair and further still joining the EEC, had the EEC remained as was originally sold to the British public we would not be having any of these problems and nor would any of the problems the rest if the EU exist, different ones maybe, but not these problems and they would not have been as complicated or divisive.
You mean conservatives misleading the people about what the EU is doing? Colour me unsurprised.
Interesting to watch even two years later. It shows how professional the EU negotiators were while the Brits didn't even have an idea on the Irish border issue and the status of residents.
A well educated person speaking with full knowledge on the subject of Brexit and showing the UK government for how utterly clueless they really are.
The UK government is like a spoilt child who is screaming and shouting on the floor demanding everything but when you give them something they just keep shouting no.
The UK created this problem, it's their job to fix it. We in the EU have our own country's to run and its no our job to hand hold the UK government through their problem that they created. Too much time has been wasted in the EU on brexit. We're tired of listening to the bitching and moaning from the UK.
We've given you a very good deal, either take it or leave with no deal and screw your country over.
Do you not think the EUs responsibility and accountability need to increase as its power does?
We wont be with you to pick up the pieces after german hegemony has crushed all your economies. Goodluck, we wont forget this.
Uk ask for more sovereignty and Europe Union cant give them what they really want, Europe Union is not a democratic institution and deeds such as Greece bailouts show it.
David Barbero
Greece overspent on public jobs without an end of the bag!! Say should be happy that EU backed them and gave them money to survive. Everybody told Greece that they spend too much and no one wanted to hear it! So in my opinion the EU shouldn’t have given them any damn cent! Every country in the EU receive money for projects and not for wages for overcrowded public system. Shame on Greece!
@@jules9056
Greeces Entry into the EU's single currency was littered with fraud, everybody knew they didn't meet the criteria needed.The consequences were plain for all to see.
The European Project WILL eventually collapse leading to widesread civil dis- order..
Sounds like the EU is much more concerned about the Troubles than the Brits.
Aden-AUA-Hauer
To me you sound like someone English that voted in a referendum.
By that I am asking where your big nose and oversized shoes are.
It's the English of whom some don't care because they see it as a foreign problem. They sort of want to hang on to NI for pride but other than that it's of no interest to them.
The Brits are in a massive denial regarding the Troubles. Pathetic.
I disagree. (apologies this is a bit long, but sound bites are ruining the world right now.)
- The Brits seem plenty concerned about the troubles, and their obligations under the good Friday agreement, they have stated that they will not install a hard border, they only want "technology checks" (i.e ANPR type systems looking at who is crossing the border.) they want "inland" inspection miles from the border. (the reality of that is probably something looking like a huge warehouse somewhere in/near Belfast where goods can be inspected whether they arrive by road/rail/air or sea.)
The Irish seem quite committed to not having a border on land. - or at least it would be politically suicidal to suggest that there should be a border on the island!
Both countries seem quite aware that there cannot/must not be a hard border on land. and appear to take their responsibility under various acts/agreements quite seriously...
both countries also seem aware that Irish have been able to live and work in the UK since 1949 (quite a while before the EU existed.)
any reading of history will tell you that the border security was quite lapse until the troubles really got going, where terrorist were using the border to flee to a safe space after doing what they did.
A laymans explanation of this is:
The UK wants to just look at what lorries are going into / out of, so they can see patterns, and attempt to catch smugglers like this,
The UK appears quite happy to operate a trust based land border with no mandatory physical checks.
-given that the UK is made of basically fishing islands with sea going boats that can (and do) travel the world, and return back unchecked, this doesn't seems that unusual, (there is no customs office in Mousehole...) - in case you argue customs would be pointless in a fishing village.. another example, Fowey is an international export harbor, capable of receiving 17,000 ton 200 meter ships... there is no regular customs officer there. - and the government of the UK seems happy to control its only land border in the same fashion.
there is no need to stop "Irish" people living or working in the UK as they have been able to do this since 1949, or, since forever excluding 187 years between 1922 - 1949
In short, the UK appears to accept this "possibly permeable" border as a small price to pay for peace in Ireland.
The EU (not Ireland) say that they will insist on a border... simple/technology based checks etc are not enough...
this (the fact that the EU insists on frontier borders.) leaves only a few solutions, one of which is:
NI alone stays in the customs union and has different laws and regulations to the UK. "hard border" is moved to the sea. (this is what the "backstop" does)
So it is reasonably easy to see how and why the back stop is unpopular (and plays into the hands of the "no sovereignty" claims) the "deal" is that if the UK and EU have not worked out an agreement in 2 years, Northern Ireland falls under EU goods controls and laws and there is an international border between Britain and Northern Ireland.
You can imagine that this is about as popular as if the UK said no border, instead Ireland must be committed to following import laws of the UK and have customs checks at ports with the EU. and it amounts to the same. laws of a country, or a part of a country being set by someone/something that should not control them.
At the end of the day regardless of what negotiators say there are only 3 things that are true.
It is up to the UK how the UK governs its international borders, if it chose not to install border infrastructure, no other country can force it to. (same as nobody forces the UK to station customs office at each fishing village (sea port.)
It is up to Ireland how it enforces its international borders (land an sea) it may chose not to install a "hard border"
It is up to the EU whether it applies pressure to Ireland to break the good Friday agreement and install border infrastructure, (a hard border) or whether it will operate a "possibly permeable" frontier.
All these points are simply political points, and therefore just the opinion of whoever rules in the day. though they will be argued as though they are facts.
@@mdluddite one of the founding principles of the EU is PEACE in Europe so the EU is very concerned about keeping Ireland peaceful.
The Scottish Government should immediately offer Sabine Weyand the job of running the Scottish Civil Service and in the hopefully near future she can negotiate our return to the EU.
THERESA MAY
The kind of negotiator to come out of DFS with a full priced sofa.
So would Jeremy Corbyn
I think she may manage to pay 20% more
and she cant sit on it..or ever throw it away...
Brilliant 😁😁😁😁😁
STOLEN MEME! Fall on your sword sir!
5 comments so far, 4 of them about her appearennce...and one just shouting "no deal"...
Yeah...I'm loosing faith in humanity.
Edit : Ok. "losing".
I'm not english , and the only time I use english is on youtube.I could use autocorrect , but.. I have a life and ...it wasn't really my goal to impress you with my english skills...
But it is funny to see how many ppl were upset with the form , and not with the content ....wich was my original point.
Aliens take me away please!
This is the female equivalent of a plain, bald fat man, with statement glasses.
Utterly farcical.
What is wrong with her appearance? We can;t all be as pretty as you are. on the flip side , she has more brains than you do.
Don't lose your faith Speedy! Comments about how she looks like a mad feminist or deranged SJW is humanity! in all it's weird, mad, awful, funny, disgusting beauty!
Take this back to events like the reformation and there would have been blood running in the streets, thousands upon thousands slaughtered or enslaved. Now all we do is make rude comments on youtube or twitter and occasionally march at the weekend with placards and silly pink hats that look like fannies. so really, we've come a long way baby!
I have scratched my head wondering how on earth UK could, after two years, have ended up in the situation they are now with people screaming "this is not what I was told leave would mean, I have changed my mind and wasn't a new chance to say what I want", "leave means leave!", "brexit means brexit!", "we can't support the Prime Ministers deal", "we must support the Prime Ministers deal", "we must leave without a deal"... with a few months until D-day.
Then I read comments like the ones on this video and it all becomes a bit clearer. For a vast majority of those who comment like this Brexit was never a rational, logical fact-based decision. It was the real-life equivalent of writing angry non-coherent and off-the-point comments on YouTUbe videos.
I'm very glad she's on the EU team.
All on the EU side are like her, on the UK side more like David Davis!
Russians did great job confusing Brexiters to vote out of where they were doing great. I hope Scotland leaves UK honestly - they get it. Brexit is waste of all of our time & money. UK - bye bye - just please go, boycotting all UK products too. I feel like they are traitors honestly.
I would be so afraid if she would be my enemy…
Love her. Clearly cutting through all the self-serving, muddled garbage coming from the UK's political class. And, putting to the sword the unclear , unrealistic thinking of the Brexiteers. Brexiteers:. you get the life you deserve.
yes, but unfortunately all the Brits get the life the Brexiteers deserve.
She puts the EU's side of the argument in the EU's terms. We've heard it all before. All this phoney debate could have been avoided many months ago, but for the fact we have a Remainer PM and a majority Remainer Cabinet. We Brexiteers have simple and definite ideas about what to do, thank you very much, and they are easily achievable.
You get the life you deserve? Don't be stupid. Neither being in the EU nor being out of the EU will give many people the life that they deserve. Thanks or no thanks to the general nature of humans, some people have a better life than they deserve, some people have a worse life than they deserve.
@@johneggmuldoon3176 You have a Remainer PM because none of the Brexiteers wanted to be PM after they won the referendum. Makes you wonder, doesn't it?
In short, she says; " UK wants to keep all the benefits and reject the burden"...
Yep, that pretty much sums it up.
Short question to all Brits commenting her appearance: How do you cast your negotiation teams? Based on looking good?
I know for sure good looks aren't a requirement for being Prime Minister...
David Davies is a handsome man
@@thepolticalone961 Be that as it may, your PM has always reminded me of a scarecrow.
As a Brit, I don't want us to have a negotiating team at all. I don't want a withdrawal agreement, I just want to continue being part of the EU.
That's not to say I don't want to see changes to the relationship. I want us to be full members of Schengen. I want us to join the Euro. I want us to commit in deed and not mearly word to the principle of ever closer union. Eventually, I'd like to see a system where there is a two-tier system of governance in Europe, with the European Parliament being the supreme authority, and the current National governments act as regional governments, administering their territories as part of a greater European whole.
This would explain so much.
She must have mopped the floor with "Brexit Secretaries" like David Davis.
Jeff Hall well Davis couldn’t negotiate with the EU cause may had gripped the negotiation to a point he couldn’t say anything to get out of her deal. So it’s not Davis’s fault. If he had free range he’d done a good job.
@@courserhuntergaming6714 No 10 took over the negotiations after he had resigned. May, like any boss, told him what to negotiate for, but those red lines were the same red lines David Davis had supported while campaigning for the Leave campaign. He promised the moon, and sat down at the negotiation table with an instruction from May to deliver on the promises of his campaign: No more freedom of movement, no EU legislative or regulatory authority, and remain a member of the customs union. Turns out you can't have your cake and eat it.
Indeed Jeff. In fact, I believe that her charming necklace is made from the shriveled testes dropped by our brexit negotiators as they fled the room in panic. The testicles of David Davis being a noteable absence, due to their small size and difficulty to thread.
I find it a testament to the EU's patience and maturity, that they continue speaking to us as adults long after we made it quite abundantly clear that were no other adults in the room.
Don't they realise that we're immune to their facts? Why don't they go away and let us drive this circus bus off the cliff in peace : /
@@garychap8384 I think I peed a bit laughing to hard at it :)
She will not have done that herself. I am confident the secretaries mopped the floor themselves...
I think it's time to say a nice farewell to our beloved non-European English friends across the Channel. You said many not-so-nice things about Europe since your referendum. We respect you and your decision based on emotions not facts. But we learned, as the discussion became ever more bitter and cynic, even hostile towards us Europeans, that the English people is not "capable of being European", as a German diplomat recently concluded. Now that you have cleared your path out of Europe, we wish you good luck! And to paraphrase the British ambassador in Berlin: You are free to have your cake and just go. Sooner or later, when you have become aware that your politicians took away from the British people their European citizenship and its privileges, we will be able to discuss in depth again if and under what conditions you could in the future reenter the European Union. But for now, it is time for the divorce you wanted and only you voted for.
As I have said from the beginning, this will eventually end with the UK adopting the Euro.
I can now see why Scotland wants independence, they were told to vote 'no' to independence to be in the EU, now they're being dragged out of the EU despite every area voting remain. Sucks!
Yes, but they are still part of the union. London also wanted to stay but you can't break the UK into smaller parts just like that. If the Scots vote for independence then it's up to them what they do about Europe, but at the moment they'll have to live with it.
@AzerGhost16 You are an imbecil. Scotland stayed in the UK because of London fearmongering the Scots that if they leave the UK they will also leave the EU. 2 years later you fucked the Scots over and said good bye EU
@yeah, right Let's have Scotland in the EU vs Scotland in the UK. In the EU, Scotland would have the right to decline the ratification of treaties made in Brussels while now in the UK whatever Westminster says Scotland must obey (Scotlnd Act 1998), Holyrood has no say over it. UK is much more undemocratic than the EU not to mention other benefits of being in the EU instead of the UK.
@AzerGhost16 Scotland voted to stay in the 2014 referendum, majorly due to being guaranteed a place in the EU through the UK. This they were promised by the English, Westminster, call it whatever you like. Now, however, this no longer applies, since you gullible imbeciles voted to leave the EU, based on a plethora of lies. So there's that.
The English replies who are so horrifyingly unaware of the fact they basically bribed Scotland to stay with them with the UK's EU membership don't seem realize your point.
Hopefully they do understand that the Scottish are entirely entitled to another vote on leaving the UK immediately after Brexit drags them all out.
Very clearly communicated. Thank you.
You must be a EU sheep. Baa!
@@austenj4539 No I'm a human. Hello.
@@Godhorus Me too. The amendments passed in Parliament this evening are clearly ruling out having WTO ruled out and have supported a Brady amendment to send Mrs May back to the EU on a futile gesture. Tusk has immediately ruled out renegotiation, so WTO is clearly coming for Brexit and I love it.
@@austenj4539 Cool random story. Now who are you and why are you talking to me?
@@Godhorus WTO Brexit is now clearly on the table as the only viable option. Looking forward to it.
She picks her words carefully. All of them. And she is very careful not to step on anyone's toes.
fully agree and even then by the reactions of some of the contributors in this discussion, we can see she finds the right buttons to push. Often poking fun can help someone reflect on their ignorance if it is unconsciously... still glad she poked well even if she could not educate the intentionally uneducated.
Aka a politician.
I am Irish and I am a very proud European. UK is making a very big mistake and poor Scotland is being dragged into something, which they know, will be Britians demise.
Very sorry, it was a democratic vote.
A proud European and so anti-British.
Ron Peel
I don’t know this Irish Tony dude. There’s nothing anti British in what he said.
Nobody in the EU gets the British like the Irish do. It’s a love-hate relationship.
Britain called the shots from about 1800 to 1914. Then it called half the shots until Pearl Harbour. After Suez Britain became an “also ran “ like Austria on the international stage.
In 1956 it may have been 40% approx of the GNP of the nations which now make up the EU.
Time moved on. The Berlin Wall fell and as the former Comecon countries figured out the capitalist system Britain’s share of EU GDP reduced. Britain didn’t become poorer. Just the other countries caught up.
Now it wants to regain its former preeminence. ‘ Won’t happen!. The other 27 member states won’t have it.
Thing is it’s not Brussels. It’s the other 27. Britain’s trade with them is a tiny fraction of the trade they do with other.
I totally get why British people would like not to be beholden to the wishes of people in the other 27 member states. It’s just that it works both ways. Margaret Thatcher’s vision off the single market was a level playing field. This was her gift to the EU. Now the other 27 don’t want to give it up.
So it’s in or out. ‘ Can’t have it both ways..
@@Dubcel1 Thanks for the history lesson and, you know what, I agree with most of what you said with the exception that we want it both ways. From my perspective, I want only one way and that is out regardless of the consequences.
@@ronpeel1878 of course he is anti-british most Irish people hate the British I never understood why but now living here I can understand them very well.
People talking about her looks ... this is poor. It only shows you have no arguments left at all.
I'm very glad having her working for us in the EU - what a professional and well spoken person! Looking at the ever changing people on the other side of the table ... as a Britsh citizen i would be scared shitless.
richymoto Agree. And anyways, what’s wrong with her looks?
*100%* of comments: *Sabine Weyand is an amazing woman with facts*
its a change to unfact Brexshiteers in the UK!
Same people criticizing her style are happy to listen to Bojo.
BoJo has lost quite a bit of weight though.
@Zanzibar979 you say sub-human and you have Zanzibar in your name lol.
@@jameswhiteley6843 But he/she is correct!
Has he found a comb yet?
That's spelt Bozo not Bojo!
I want this woman to start her own RUclips channel where she takes 10 minutes each week to explain the current issues of top-level EU politics...
I'm afraid that those unelected politicians of Brussels have a lot more other things to do than running a youtube channel, ... they have to manage horrible dictatorships, etc
She gives a very astute and accurate portrayal of the facts and the situation as it has developed so far.
It is refreshimg to hear some clarity^^
Having just spent the evening watching Channel 4 News in Parliament and then come to this, it’s not hard to see where the adults are.
What has got into Britain? How has it so badly lost the plot of reasonable moderate decision making that it would commit such serious self harm.
I can only think it’s because the grounding for sensible moderate decision making is a fair society that cares for its people. Somewhere that’s what we lost.
Cristal clear explanation of this negotiation, none of the british negotiators were able to show it in such a clever way. She shows how the EU negotiators were fair and flexible.
This comparison only shows how British diplomatic abilities have degenerated…
I feel sorry for the EU politicians having to deal with our insane govt
Our politicians have had to deal with enforced EU legislation for years. Their sad their second highest contributor is leaving.
@@monarchist1838 - £9 billion per year is not why the EU is sad. It was the collective benefits.
@@monarchist1838 I wonder what your politicians will come up with once they can't shift the blame on the EU anymore.
+Miles I wonder which member state the EU will choose to pay more membership fees?
@@monarchist1838 - on a per person basis the spreading of the UK contribution equates to about 7p per person per week. That is not such a big issue is it?
This is what a representative of a government / organization should look like. Speak with logic and make clear arguments. Now on the other side of the aisle, you have Farage, Boris Johnson and David Cameron...
This lady would wipe the floor with Farage, Mogg, Johnson and the rest. They wouldn't dare try and get off one of their soundbites with her in the room.
Brilliant clear summary of the situation at the moment, nobody can argue with the facts.
Wanna know a fact?
EU will disintegrate in five years, germany will make a grab to the east and the north, creating a deutschmark zone.
Lol look it up...youre all kidding yourselves
@@notnotness4765 where did you her that at a UKIP conference :) go back to bed or see a psychiatrist .
@@notnotness4765 It will happen the same day the UK gets it s Empire so never. (Fun Fact, the UK has slaugtered or enslaved more ppl then any other country in history, it sure is a country you should trust :D)
@@notnotness4765
The EU has been about to "crumble" for decades now... pretty sure that you will post the same text in 5, 10 and 15 years
Johnny morris
And yet someone still tried, arguing clearly communicated facts and logic with nothing more than conjecture and hypothetical scenarios.
That’s the brexit “debate” in a nutshell though.
This video should be compulsory viewing for every Brexiteer, on slow speed and repeat, just to make sure it actually sinks in.
Thank you Sabine Weyand for the excellent explanation of the consequences of Brexit. Proud to be European and member of the EU.
As a UK citizen I would like to say I'm sorry the whole situation. Its embarrassing
At least some UK citizens are taken ownership - you should go into politics and replace the Tories
dont worry, its will getting worse!
Don't be embarrassed about democracy, when the democratic majority of the UK voted for sovereignty, independence from a corrupt, anti democratic, unaccountable, declining, protectionist, mafioso organisation run by a bunch of childish, vindictive, self serving, gravy train riding, free loading parasites. Leaving was about self governance, empowering the UK to make its own decisions. It does not set in stone what those decisions must be, it's back in the hands of the UK public and not in the hands of or shackled to Brussels.
Politicians (and many people) in the UK are just starting to shift blame to the EU, denying the facts that the mess is created by their own country's negotiator. Terms in question and rejection by the house of commons and politicians are actually proposed by the British negotiator.
Ah, integrity and honesty... I remember when we had this in Britain too.
Thank you Channel 4 for covering our Polic Dialogue on Brexit!
Can you please come and explain all this to our UK House of Idiots, who seem to know nothing, remember nothing, understand nothing, and have no idea what they are doing.
By leaving the single market and customs union but wanting to keep the border open, the UK is essentially trying to close a door but still allow things to pass through it. It's completely illogical.
What like around 90% of the rest of the world?
@@monarchist1838 Closed hard borders. But this is changing as more counties are joining blocs.
@@monarchist1838 Simple misunderstanding. The UK is trying to become an entirely different customs territory (closing the door) without installing a border between itself and Ireland, (allowing things to pass through freely). Sabine says in this video from 9:20, that there's no way around having a border between two different legal territories. They've looked at every border they can and can't find any example, any precedent for how that's even possible. The technology to automate it does not yet exist. That's what I meant.
Thanks for that very good analogy.
No matter how eloquently and clearly set out facts are, the sad fact of the matter is that Brexiteers in general lack the intelligence to digest them.
Silly me - Until you made your comment it had never occurred to me what superior intelligence people who voted remain must have...
Thats always a good way to start an argument. Thats exactly how Trump was able to become the POTUS. People just love to claim the intellectual or moral high-ground to dismiss other opinions. Just food for thought :)
Science has found that one's vote in the Brexit referendum has almost as much effect on IQ as watching Rick & Morty.
@@lllaugi No, he became president because of misinformation and tapping into people's fears with grandiose false promises. No matter how diplomatic and rational one is, people with low levels of education will never be able to digest the facts properly. It is a sad fact, and I think we are doing them more of a disservice pretending that Trump and Brexit voters know what they are talking about. They simply don't.
Obviously that factors into it. It still doesnt change the fact that the generalization of his voter base as uneducated and deplorable only helped to divide the nation more and give them something to rally around as victims. Denying someone his or her vote only because of different opinions is super counter productive. In fact thats what a lot of populists hope to achieve to get the victim card. I would be pretty careful on how you marginalize people of other opinions. @@Rafael-xt1nm
7:18 this. ''Our impression from here is that the discussion in London at the moment is much more about the future of the country and the future of the EU-UK relationship that it is about the content of the withdrawal agreement. In fact, a lot of the discussion is *uninhibited* by any knowledge of what is IN the withdrawal agreement.''
So basically, the Withdrawal agreement has been heavily influenced by the UK.Yet the UK doesn't want to own it.
Meanwhile,the EU can't (not won't,) make any amendments because no (new) concrete alternatives - which needs to be put into legal text - has been suggested by the UK.
No wonder this cannot be reopened. The EU27 is basically waiting for the UK to get its act together....
As I don't like what she says because the naked truth hurts, I'm going to mock her looks instead
More intelligence and logic in this woman than in the whole House of Commons. And how refreshingly articulate too.
She is one of the "EU Bureaucrats" Brexeteers always referring to. She is an EU employee. Well I think she is worth the money! The EU had also pay for people like Farage which was in the PECH (Fishing) he attended only 2 of the 40 Committee meetings. Obviously she does and know her work!
Exactly. The UK has 400.000 civil servants to protect it. The EU has 30.000 (well-paid) bureaucrats like Weyand. I think I know why they deserve the salary.
Well, one of the reasons the UK is leaving the EU is because the evil Brussels is deciding things for them! Well, yes, technically, they have a vote in it, but that would require their ellected officials to be present, so...
@@SuddenReal - maybe you should have elected better MEPs and officials, then. Might be the source of the whole problem here...come to think of it.
@@samhartford5889 Oh, I'm not British. My elected officials do their job (such as Guy Verhofstad who's leading the negotiations for the Brexit on the EU side).
@@SuddenReal - Oh sorry, me neither. Cheers to proportional representation and better politicians.
I'm just going to say it - I miss real politicians. This lady made me nostalgic and and really happy they still exist. I need to get some more of this in to my head brain
Very clear explanation of what was negotiated for Brexit. Thanks for this video! What's coming from British politicians is just fantasies.
Please come to our (UK) parliament and explain it in even simpler terms to our MPs 🤣🤣 very very well articulated and the way she described the withdrawal package is far less ambiguous than what the UK media, mainly our politicians have been portraying
Explaining to our MP's would do no good i fear Polly, they don't understand a simple word like Out , or Majority anything with more than one syllable or technical is way beyond what they call a Brain.
A united Ireland would do wonders to solve this problem.
Wow! A competent politician! It’s just I’m a Brit and this smart woman presenting facts just feels so alien to me...
Not a politician, a civil servant.
Yes, minister.
@@lpabildgaard Unelected official from Brussels. 😂
@@nanana5412 yep, are you a troll?
@@lpabildgaard No, I am not. Isn't it what Brits use to say nowadays. Unelected official...
And now reports in British Media (BBC) and I quote: “EU leaders are unlikely to touch the conditions of the backstop UNTIL a no-deal Brexit is well and truly staring them in the face.”
Again going back to the myths and unicorns of hardball negotiations will get us everything we want... being in and out simultaneously and being able to deal with everyone like we wish with full access to the EU, no borders in Ireland but full control over immigration.... wow
The UK is just an embarrassment at this point.
I think the last time a UK politician spoke this accurately and with such relevance was when Tony Blair was in power and he had a cabinet full of academics. Miss those days so much.
Glad we have the EU, salutations to all my european brothers and sisters.
One can't help comparing the eloquence and clarity of thought of this lady with that of our own Prime Minister.
And suddenly one realises that the EU are extremely well educated, informed and flexible
She’s obviously not involved in the negotiations any more then as we are not seeing any of those things. She’s also missed the point that the deal she was talking about was incredibly one sided, which is why it couldn’t get through Parliament.
@@eddiel7635 the childish and utter disfunctional UK parliament can't get anything constructive done whatsoever . And btw , she was promoted to a very good job shortly after and I'm sure is thankful she does not need to deal with little Britain anymore
Jacob Jorgenson mate, it’s not dysfunctional, the government has a massive majority and are able to pass any law they like. I’m not sure why you have such a big chip on your shoulder? why so angry?
@@jacobjorgenson9285 says the bloke who likes to know under 2 year olds biblically
@@jasonhannon4735 you already give up? Shows the depth lacking
Far from making me rally against the EU the whole Brexit situation has highlighted the absolutely rational and intrinsically positive nature of our European cousins. Given the completely malignant nature of British media and politicians, Myself and many others I have spoken to have never felt so European and regardless of how Brexit goes down I want to reassure fellow Europeans that contrary to the vocal and ignorant masses, there are many in the UK that are appalled by the situation and the message it sends to those who we should be diligently working more closely with.
The EU 27 have one voice. The EU defends its members and represents their interest. The UK is a mess run by clows who cant unify UK parties or the 4 countries in the UK
So eloquently spoken what a brilliant lady. Facts are facts...I spoke with a hardcore Brexiteer recently not to argue in anyway but to try to understand the reasoning and potential solutions available. It was truly shocking how argumentative and defensive he became when I asked a few simple questions. Ignorance is bliss for some people.
Very clear words - easy to understand for even the most hard-line leaver ..
@@Adrian-jk4kx um, google translate has some trouble recognizing your speech patterns .. make sure you did not have a brain aneurysm
@john hansberry the "... bleeding obvious." - somehow i do not think it is anything but obvious to many people
john hansberry
And yet, it seems like a large part of Brits don't quite get it....
Clear, concise, informative and unemotional - she should be interviewed far more on UK television for the electorate to be correctly informed and not misled. The UK was always in safe hands in the EU and profitably placed in the largest trading block. It took lies and fantasies to convince the politically uneducated electorate to want to leave for personal gain of a small number of very divisive and powerful politicians.
If the UK still wants to leave, knowing what they now now about the disadvantages and lack of benefits, the withdrawal should be phased. A careful and measured step at a time. Leave but stay in the single market and customs union and, as methods become available to keep a soft border on the island or Ireland then, and only then, take the next carefully measured and fully supported and publicly endorsed step. Only fools rush out where angels fear to tread.
Meanwhile, UK is still debating on the deal, when EU already said there will not be renegotiation xD
Yes indeed. I guess the Tories and their flunkies are still in a massive denial. Farewell UK. enjoy your poverty.
Whether you are for or against Brexit, it is hard not to see Sabine Weyand as an intelligent, informed and articulate person, setting out the current position clearly -- in excellent English. Which is why it's sad to see many of the comments below focusing on for/against Brexit, conspiracy theories and even childish name-calling between commenters -- often in barely functional English.
usvalve
So, care to guess why so many Leave voters fail to see it?
"debate in the UK about the withdrawal agreemant, unhindered by knowledge of what is in it"
- priceless!
The UK is the slowest kid in the class when it comes to understanding the EU and their obligations to the Good Friday Agreement. The anti-reality discussions in the UK about "binning the backstop" illustrate how out of touch the politicians really are.
How I wish she was British. I would vote for her. She is head and shoulders above any politician we have.
She's a "Europhile" and very dangerous. Don't be stupid, never vote for these fascist eu polititians. Vote them out, vote against the EUSSR! Cheers from the Netherlands.
@@JustaPoke Sure, forget about Rotterdam being one of the main European ports when NL leaves the EU. NL will be bankrupt in a week as goods for Europe will pass through Antwerp and Hamburg.
@@AW-iw6kt Nonsence, we don't need a political union with overpaid politicians to keep harbors going. Back to the EEG. The EU will end in time anyway, not a lot of the people want a EUSSR! Watch the next elections.
A W A threat?
Maybe you wish you were European
Not only did the UK create the main problem, Brexit, we also created the problem within the problem, the NI backstop, and then as if that wasn't enough we proceeded to create a third problem, within a problem, within a bigger problem, rejecting our own solution to the problem within a problem without proposing an alternative.
All this while the EU is sitting back, watching and simply repeating the same question for 2 years, "what do you (Tories) want????????????????????????????????"
it's quite pathetic really.
Could she our PM please? Our lot are so clueless...
Chaos & messes need not just happen spontaneously & too late to be prevented because they are unexpected, but they are planned and carefully implemented especially when there is collusion between the 2 sides. I wager there are no minutes recorded by any means of what the participants actually said at all the meetings which took place; we just have to take Weyand's word for the claims made in her video. Varoufakis can confirm important talks are not customarily recorded.
I miss the days when 65M Brits all suddenly became experts in international trade deals - everyone - plumbers, managers, delivery drivers, bankers, salesman... all battling it out on social media about who knows the most about bilateral market-market trade deals. Now days people are just arguing about which way is up.
What a woman, she is right in evry single word
Im sorry, but if you think the uk government ever intended to get a good deal then youre an idiot.
Jesus
hey, dont talk to jesus that way. apologize
No wonder Teresa May was crying EU leaders are mean to her. She can't compete in a discussion with people like this.
'A lot of the discussion is uninhibited by any knowledge of what is actually in the withdrawal agreement.'
Well said! 7:42
Clear mind, clear explanation... devoid of political and ideological jargon . Intellectually honest.
Intelligent people are beautiful.