Isn't it that as consumer choices became a proxy of browser algorithms, also the people using AI will soon repeat only the arguments proposed by machine learning systems? Maybe all technological revolutions partly are about losing some basic (vital) competences?
@@IOFLOOD we could use the machines to improve the human condition or we can use them to make a hundred people extremely wealthy which one do you think we're going to do?
@@DoubtfireClub Improving the human condition will in turn make those hundred people in control wealthier in the long run, versus short-sightedly robbing their consumers of buying power(in the long term, buying their products for years and decades to come). You don't sound like you understand basic economics.
As for alien contact and effects, just read Lem. He figured out many of today's dilemmas years ago. Read Stanisław Lem, and you will know:) and maybe even understand how it will develop and impact humanity. Thank you for the interesting yet slightly myopic (optimism is a choice, not a cognition) discussion.
Eine Vielzahl von Behauptungen, die nicht bewiesen sind. Plausibilität reicht nicht. Als Grundlage fehlt eine präzise Definition von AI. Die erwähnten Unternehmen könnten rasch als Spuk verduften.
![Felix "Unfair" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Oswujxm2Ag0/mqdefault.jpg)
This podcast title is so very true !
Isn't it that as consumer choices became a proxy of browser algorithms, also the people using AI will soon repeat only the arguments proposed by machine learning systems? Maybe all technological revolutions partly are about losing some basic (vital) competences?
indeed
HBR articles are the best!
agreed the framework I use is adjust adapt advantage for Change Management
In the AI world we’re talking change on 15:41 steroids
Powers law: as machines become to seem more human-like, humans will be treated more like machines, especially by corporations and governments.
@@IOFLOOD we could use the machines to improve the human condition or we can use them to make a hundred people extremely wealthy which one do you think we're going to do?
@@DoubtfireClub Improving the human condition will in turn make those hundred people in control wealthier in the long run, versus short-sightedly robbing their consumers of buying power(in the long term, buying their products for years and decades to come). You don't sound like you understand basic economics.
Watching and listening. Thank you for this great discussion.
Very nice! Good insights.
Loved this video and couldn’t agree more!
Just like digits photography will never replace film, or automobile will never replace horses!
Great Stuff. Acoustics is poor.
The Learning Journey never stops, the future will come. and Humans can control the AI
As for alien contact and effects, just read Lem. He figured out many of today's dilemmas years ago. Read Stanisław Lem, and you will know:) and maybe even understand how it will develop and impact humanity.
Thank you for the interesting yet slightly myopic (optimism is a choice, not a cognition) discussion.
How would diversity of thought get impacted by generative AI
We'll become clones
Eine Vielzahl von Behauptungen, die nicht bewiesen sind.
Plausibilität reicht nicht.
Als Grundlage fehlt eine präzise Definition von AI.
Die erwähnten Unternehmen könnten rasch als Spuk verduften.
Is this Dutch?
That’s true!
This makes no sense. There will definitely be a point where even creative thinking will be AI. AI will definitely replace us.
humans manipulate physical objects: this is how humans learn & control the environment;
A.I. cannot manipulate physical objects
No it won't replace us at all
AI will make us lazier physically an intellectially than we already are
Hahaha no
If Ai can replace these two blathering stammering dudes with an entity that at the very least enunciates I’m all for it.