okay so I notice some people have a problem with me calling the objective building a ''terrorist compound''. Just so you guys know, it's literally what the in game mission-description says: ''Al Qaeda have established a fortified compound in the area. Assault the compound and clear it out.''
Even if it's Al Qaeda, in that specific battle, they were not taking on the role of terrorists but rather militiamen, rebels, insurgents, etc. The issue that people have is that from an objective perspective that is not mired in American bias, the "terrorists" are what you would call "freedom fighters" from the Iraqi perspective who are defending their home, town, schools, and country from another country invading them. To them, Americans were not liberators, to them it's like any country invading your country, dropping bombs for months, rolling tanks and military hardware through your childhood town and streets, but when you pick up a gun to do something about it, you're a "terrorist" and the bad guy? This realization is what affected a lot of US veterans after-the-fact. Al-Qaeda on 9/11 were absolutely evil terrorists, but some townie picking up a gun and fighting under whatever local militia and automatically calling those fighters in the compound "terrorists" puts them into a mentally and morally defunct label that allows you to ignore all of that and just "hurr durr ez kill less than human terrorist lmao". It's like calling the Founding Fathers and the minutemen "terrorists". They're a lot more than that. But go ahead and ignore what I say because it's easier for you to cope with. Also, fuck Al-Qaeda.
I think this game does a great job capturing the battle in a respectful and realistic way. I am really looking forward to the console release because the developers clearly care about their game here.
Agreed but I feel like it might be hard to add content as the one map is every map and it's hard to add guns like the hk416 or even the m4 without straying from its realisism maybe I'm wrong but I don't think they where used much if at all during fallujah
@@falke_9775 I disagree. This game isn’t “fun and arcadey” like modern games. It’s very tactical, which will eliminate the possibility of children playing the game. Also, the option to play as both sides offers a new perspective on the war and makes sure the game isn’t just “fuck yeah America murders all of these terrorists”
Thats ridiculous, theres tons and tons of war shooters that depict battles where thousands lost their lives, to say its “disrespectful” would be to call every cod game that depicts a real life battle disrespectful
@@personaltreat5472and you fucking middle east countries never improve yourselves and ignore about the rapes in your country. Sorry but this is a morality and survival of the fittest war. As an half Kurd and Armenian, I despise Arabs with a passion. This world is about money and groups. Some people are better off in afterlife. I have got no respect for nation that marry little kids and ignore the rapists in their country. Sorry but you are on your own.
@@personaltreat5472 In one of the missions the Iraqis are hiding in a mosque. A war crime. I'm not saying war crimes weren't committed, but Iraq also committed their fair share. Like the gas shells launched at Coaltion forces, filled with sarin gas, the Kurds gassed, and how US marines found uranium. Again, this does not negate Abu Ghraib. It does not negate Haditha. It does not negate white phosphorus in Fallujah. It does not negate rape, torture, mistargeting, or other massacres. But those still don't negate suicide and civilian bombings. It does not negate executions. It does not negate torture. I do not wish to stir hate, but the war was not black and white between the Coaltion and Iraq. It was extremely gray.
I love how aggressive and flank-focused the AI is in this game. I wish AI in other shooters were more like this and not just buffed with damaged and overwhelming numbers
@@bschuske its like people hating on Battlefield games because how dare everyone in the match not talk to me like duh why would they all suddenly be tactical especially battlebits 200+ player counts lol the games fine you just have bad match ups
Yeah sorry but a microphone should be minimum requirement nowadays. In Games like R6, for example, you shouldn't be allowed to play ranked without a microphone. Change my mind.
@@VeryCoolCatBFr6 can absolutely be played without a mic. Nowadays we have pings that help communicating, also, using a mic doesn't mean that others will listen to you since a lot of people that use it are toxic and insult everyone for the littlest things
@@Necroix03 yes, of course you can. Still, I can assure you that you're doing better with proper vocal communication. For me, for example, when I'm solo queueing then I'll still use my mic just for safety and for call-out practice. I also have to admit that I'm that guy who is taking some games serious 😅 like uhmmm I'm literally that guy who can get very erm competitive xD
@@nenish No it isnt. A bot would say something like: can we all appreciate the effort he puts into his vids. He says something specificly to the topic everytime. But only from like the first 5 seconds. Thats why you see him everywhere. Hes trying to gain subs through commenting everywhere after seeing 5 sec off the vid and moves on. Maybe he will sell his acount as many before him did.
“I got your six” doesn’t mean “I’m standing behind you, looking over your shoulder”, It means “I’m covering your rear”, IE I’m looking BEHIND you, so no one sneaks up and shoots you in the back.
Speaking of war, I remember a story someone told me in the locker room once. During World War II, his grandfather was in a regiment that was supposed to neutralize an anti-tank gone on top of a hill while they were doing so the gun fired and hit a soldier dead center in the chest, the resulting impact blew up the man’s torso and all that was left were two legs and a waist that walked forward a couple times and then fell over. That’s some shell Shocking shit right there.
I heard a very similar story. Someone from my family was at the Don on the side of the Hungarians and he saw someone who's head got blown off and walked a bit forward before collapsing. I can't imagine what it would be like seeing things like this and living with these thoughts after the war
Holy Jesus! The audio design and more specifically the voice chat is insanely good. The other players sound like they are really there. The sounds change with every environment you're in and everything
Any war game is bound to have SOME controversy due to the real lives lost. In my opinion, games like this offers the younger generation to learn history and not repeat it, so its as essential than reading a history textbook
In America? LOL. Look up what actually happened, more civilians were killed than insurgents or marines combined. This is a propaganda game and I love it for gameplay, hate what we did. As for audio, anyone who has served, knows how bad comms is in theatre. LOL.
"this offers the younger generation to learn history and not repeat it" So encouraging kids to re-enact a war crime, because that's what the US invasion of Iraq was, is going to help them become pacifists? Are you really that naive?
@groppodalosio never said to encourage kids to commit war crimes l. You did. Im merely stating that if we dont teach the younger generations all aspects of history, both good and bad, they will bound to repeat the bad. If you want to censor the bad history, then the problem lies with you and people like you. By the way, next time you want to twist someones words up, just think twice before opening your mouth.
@deltamovieshd9255 civilians were killed in literally every war known to man, yet you have no problem play ww2 games. Like i said, every war game will have controversy due to the real lives lost. I guess i should add to that: Due to the real lives lost, both civilian and soldiers alike. I didnt know i had to state the obvious to dimwits like yourself. 🙄
Note: i dont care about your feelings or thoughts. Keep it to yourselves. If you have a problem with what i say, just shut the fuck up and look the other way. Like what your parents shouldve taught all of your sorry asses. Its a shooter game, just enjoy it.
Many of theses soldiers and marines that fought in Fallujah didn’t get any real sleep for days during the battle.. Think about that.. most people call out sick to work if they didn’t get any sleep the night prior. Imagine fighting in urban combat against a insurgency that plays dirty with IEDs, snipers, murder holes and human shields and you haven’t slept in 3 days… oh and don’t accidentally shoot any civilians or your own team mates.. thats a court martial
Look up Corporal Antonio Metruccio. He was an Italian soldier in Afghanistan. The first image that should come up in the results is of his face after 72 hours of fighting. His pupils are like pin pricks.
Imo if your okay with a vietnam war game you should have no problem with six days in fallujah. Any criticism of the Iraq war could equally leveled against nam yet no one has any problems with Vietnam games.
What does the average Iraqi think about the war in hindsight. I remember a Marine who was in there in 2004 (I think it was DevilDogGaming) say that Iraqis loved the Americans.
Never was in Fallujah, too early for me, but did have a few buddies who were there and have since played it, they told me the most startling to them, was the sound design, it sounded exactly like it did then, the combat the shouts everything about it
I see it as a way of telling the story position of a soldier. I know that they took real combat vets and ask them about their experiences. Because we all know how bad the battle of Falluja was. And to see the conditions in the possible situation is that the soldiers would’ve had to go through. I just think it brings out a lot more respect for the younger generation to see what these guys have went through.
the whole reason people liked BF1 story mode so much is that it somewhat showcased what that time was like even if not as realistic by far as Six Days having a whole misson about of Aussie fought battles was so cool
@@mikenikep5202 yeah the whole mission of being a heavy armor dude was very loosely based off the group that where basically suicide soldiers who nearly all died for their objectives for being just that brave an stubborn by far the most out their part :D
I’ve been waiting for a game like this for a while. Insurgency Sandstorm hit it for a bit but many people don’t use voice chat were playing it like COD and it stopped being fun.
@@brandoncortezemmanuel357 yea after awhile the game became very robotic, and I like the games mechanics and have had the occasional jarringly surprising cinematic firefight, but the repetitive blandness of the game now makes me not motivated to play it. Especially now since a new company has bought the game, less updates are being released and when they do, it feels like a step in reverse.
This game looks realistic especially with its mechanics and I would definitely play all I’d wish it be at least $10 cheaper but $39.99 isn’t that bad for a game like this
My cousin fought in this operation. She said “it’s great for them to show what we experienced but I hope they don’t show the civilian stuff” it’s mainly people who have not experienced this that say it’s offensive. If my cousin who was there isn’t offended then why are y’all
those randoms were pretty fun to listen to, it would be cool if you managed to bring them back for more videos. great video as always, i don't really watch gameplays anymore but this game really got my attention, i looks gritty and doesn't glorify America as the "good guys".
they made this game by interviewing people that were there (marine and iraqi). It was made to portray the battle as it unfolded and what it was like for the men on the ground, not for propaganda as some say.
If it didn't have THAT title don't think there would be any problem. Looks like a good tactical team GAME to me. Also this ISN'T the first battle to be put to video games and it won't be the last I'm sure.
This has to be the most accurate and respectful depiction of what these soldiers went through. I honestly wouldn't be surprised if the devs spoke and worked with architects and soldiers who served to develop the game.
One thing i will say i feel like that every single game at least ive seen is the way accessory on rails work. Like an olight is gonna light a room up completely, a laser in the dark is a direct beam while in the light its the dot. Scopes the mechanic of still needing to be on target to really hit. Then again these are games and are still art peices.
In 2004, all we had was the Surefire 6P 2 battery incandescent lights, and very few guys had them mounted on rifles. 60 lumens and we were all excited to have that. All this modern LED stuff was driven by this sort of fighting.
I think it’s primary selling point is that it’s controversial. I’m not impressed with the gameplay I’ve seen so far, it looks generic and outdated. If this game was called Urban Warfare 2 nobody would talk about it.
Regardless of everything else this game is equal parts beautiful and terrifying. That dark corridor you're staring down...That was someone's home, that someone's life. Now it is nothing but a dark and terrifying unknown.
I would most definitely disagree that this is "the most controversial" game ever released. Lots of older games that are just in poor taste, like a game where you play as the columbine shooters. More than this game being controversial, it's interesting. It's interesting and it gets the thumbs up of a lot of Iraq war vets. Like this isn't ready or not, you aren't playing as a CQC specialist and elite operator, you're playing as a 20 year old Lance corporal with a full length M16A4 or M249 trying to clear dark houses with flashlights. This was the battle that defined MOUT training in the 21st century and what really started to shift squad load outs and weaponry to being more compact. As for the controversy itself, it immortalizes the guys that fought there. Coming out with a game a few short years after the battle wasn't the most sensitive idea, but the wars done and enough time has passed that I think we can start looking at it differently. We remember Vietnam and WWII with video games as a medium and I think Fallujah can be moved into a similar status as to those conflicts
2k people dead looking for weapons of mass destruction in Iraq for some reason that didn't exist because some Saudis and Egyptians flew some planes into some buildings resulting an no one getting arrested and charged. Bad to the bone
Enjoy the game, but it is too difficult. The AI are super smart, I love that, the game makes you think and move but they are also all marksmen. All of the AI are perfect shots making it impossible for a single player to enjoy the game. I played it for about 3 hours and the most kills I got was 5-6, found the mortar launcher several times but always got killed because they would move and by the time you tried to follow, another would shot you from behind or at a distance. Even teams of 4 that are excellent at communication are having major difficulty. I think the game should allow the player to make us aware but also remember, we are players trying to enjoy a game. Either ease up on the difficulty or give us difficulty levels. My only complaint.
I tend to agree, or atleast some option to play it solo with AI scaled acordingly so I can get to grips with it. The guys I played with (randoms) where for the most part super chill but I was very concious that I was fucking things up and costing the team (I like to think of myself as descent at FPS games too). Somewhere that I can go learn it on my own before wrecking other peoples games would be appreciated.
@@Nebulous361 yeah, you can choose to play solo and it is tougher than playing any Dark Souls game, the most difficult Boss in Elden Ring, and forget about the Romper Room Call of Duty and BF, this game is smart and brutal. I have been watching excellent shooter gamers play in groups, guys that are excellent and communication get destroyed. I don't know who is testing this and deciding how hard to make the difficulty, but they need to ease up because the casual gamer like myself bought in to support the cause, get a glimpse of and understanding of, but damn I would like to enjoy the game beyond 4-5 kills. Love it, but freakin AI. That's why I too am still playing solo. I suck at communication, but from what I see, everyone dies, just be polite and respectful.
A close friend of mine fought in this battle, thankfully survived, and told me what a hellhole it was. He refuses to acknowledge this games' existence.
Damn this game seems so good finally a game that is based on reality likenthe objective reads something about assaulting al qaeda bases or some the fact they use real names is very nice
people calling SDIF insensitive for the lives lost i mean yes definitely but tell that to the other millions of games recreating WW1, WW2 the first and second indochina wars like i dont understand making games controversial
the remark is silly when you think about how no one got super uncomfortable about BF1 using Arabian locations, Aussies and Black Skinned Troops in its game
It's as respectful as a video game can be. People should stop complaining and get perspective on the thousands of video games before it that haven't given a thought to the historical accuracy or respect of a game depicting a historical conflict. These games are found in and out of the mainstream.
Hey man, nice video, good to see you branch out and play more varied games, don't let the hateful comments get to you, it's just people who cannot tell apart reality from entertainment.
yet no other conflict is hated by Vets for being in game form really no one got livid over BF1 using stuff all over WW1 from Aussies to Arabian conflicts etc
did you know of the game The Finals its from X Battlefield devs its quick action destructible 3V3 matches you can plow through a building grapple hook into a shotgun shot trick shot
Random people think it is insensitive and it shouldnt be a game Meanwhile soldiers who were there and returned helped work on game because they think it is great idea
okay so I notice some people have a problem with me calling the objective building a ''terrorist compound''. Just so you guys know, it's literally what the in game mission-description says: ''Al Qaeda have established a fortified compound in the area. Assault the compound and clear it out.''
nah bro u are in the wrong for shooting terrorist in a fps
Why would people have a problem with that?
@@vonknorring09 Because people are idiots. This entire location was in reality just a pure terrorist haven.
Bro, calling terrorists what they are and shooting them, and that too in a game? That's wild.
Even if it's Al Qaeda, in that specific battle, they were not taking on the role of terrorists but rather militiamen, rebels, insurgents, etc. The issue that people have is that from an objective perspective that is not mired in American bias, the "terrorists" are what you would call "freedom fighters" from the Iraqi perspective who are defending their home, town, schools, and country from another country invading them. To them, Americans were not liberators, to them it's like any country invading your country, dropping bombs for months, rolling tanks and military hardware through your childhood town and streets, but when you pick up a gun to do something about it, you're a "terrorist" and the bad guy? This realization is what affected a lot of US veterans after-the-fact. Al-Qaeda on 9/11 were absolutely evil terrorists, but some townie picking up a gun and fighting under whatever local militia and automatically calling those fighters in the compound "terrorists" puts them into a mentally and morally defunct label that allows you to ignore all of that and just "hurr durr ez kill less than human terrorist lmao". It's like calling the Founding Fathers and the minutemen "terrorists". They're a lot more than that. But go ahead and ignore what I say because it's easier for you to cope with. Also, fuck Al-Qaeda.
I think this game does a great job capturing the battle in a respectful and realistic way. I am really looking forward to the console release because the developers clearly care about their game here.
Agreed
Agreed but I feel like it might be hard to add content as the one map is every map and it's hard to add guns like the hk416 or even the m4 without straying from its realisism maybe I'm wrong but I don't think they where used much if at all during fallujah
Agreed
A video game is not a respectful way at all. Seeing as most of the playerbase is kids, most wont appreciate the background and story of the battle.
@@falke_9775 I disagree. This game isn’t “fun and arcadey” like modern games. It’s very tactical, which will eliminate the possibility of children playing the game. Also, the option to play as both sides offers a new perspective on the war and makes sure the game isn’t just “fuck yeah America murders all of these terrorists”
"It's disrespectful to the lives lost"
me: glances towards 9 million WW2 shooters.
Them saying lives mean Americans of course cause they're never wrong and never commit hundreds of war crimes in Iraq alone
Thats ridiculous, theres tons and tons of war shooters that depict battles where thousands lost their lives, to say its “disrespectful” would be to call every cod game that depicts a real life battle disrespectful
@@personaltreat5472and you fucking middle east countries never improve yourselves and ignore about the rapes in your country. Sorry but this is a morality and survival of the fittest war. As an half Kurd and Armenian, I despise Arabs with a passion. This world is about money and groups. Some people are better off in afterlife. I have got no respect for nation that marry little kids and ignore the rapists in their country. Sorry but you are on your own.
@@personaltreat5472 In one of the missions the Iraqis are hiding in a mosque. A war crime.
I'm not saying war crimes weren't committed, but Iraq also committed their fair share. Like the gas shells launched at Coaltion forces, filled with sarin gas, the Kurds gassed, and how US marines found uranium. Again, this does not negate Abu Ghraib. It does not negate Haditha. It does not negate white phosphorus in Fallujah. It does not negate rape, torture, mistargeting, or other massacres. But those still don't negate suicide and civilian bombings. It does not negate executions. It does not negate torture. I do not wish to stir hate, but the war was not black and white between the Coaltion and Iraq. It was extremely gray.
Why are people calling my Malmedy Massacre game insensitive? Maybe I should make a counter insurgency game set in Belarus in 1943 instead.
I love how aggressive and flank-focused the AI is in this game. I wish AI in other shooters were more like this and not just buffed with damaged and overwhelming numbers
Or more annoyingly health
@@falloutfart9917average call of duty's enemy in the highest difficulty
F.E.A.R has good A.I as well. But it’s very old.
@@rookie3087 i suggest stalker gamma too
Try FEAR
In all honesty. It’s an impressive game with a nice twist of things.
what twist? you daft?
You know what?
Out of everyone I've watched play this you are the first person who made it look enjoyable, you also played with randoms too
@@bschuske its like people hating on Battlefield games because how dare everyone in the match not talk to me like duh why would they all suddenly be tactical
especially battlebits 200+ player counts lol
the games fine you just have bad match ups
What about Drewski
Yeah sorry but a microphone should be minimum requirement nowadays.
In Games like R6, for example, you shouldn't be allowed to play ranked without a microphone.
Change my mind.
@@VeryCoolCatBFr6 can absolutely be played without a mic. Nowadays we have pings that help communicating, also, using a mic doesn't mean that others will listen to you since a lot of people that use it are toxic and insult everyone for the littlest things
@@Necroix03 yes, of course you can. Still, I can assure you that you're doing better with proper vocal communication. For me, for example, when I'm solo queueing then I'll still use my mic just for safety and for call-out practice.
I also have to admit that I'm that guy who is taking some games serious 😅 like uhmmm I'm literally that guy who can get very erm competitive xD
"playing with randoms cuz I dont have friends"
Hope TBAG finds friends one day
hope you find a purpose in ilfe other then generating a generic comment every vid u see
@@muik6516you didn’t own him, it’s a bot bro 😅
i'm mean were all here
@@nenish No it isnt. A bot would say something like: can we all appreciate the effort he puts into his vids. He says something specificly to the topic everytime. But only from like the first 5 seconds.
Thats why you see him everywhere. Hes trying to gain subs through commenting everywhere after seeing 5 sec off the vid and moves on.
Maybe he will sell his acount as many before him did.
@@muik6516 it’s literally just a algorithm that rips/copies generic comments, not a human.
My dad is a former Marine never went there, but he knew a guy who did go there and got half his hand got blown off an IED explosion
im sorry to hear that. god bless him for his service 🙏
Okay and they killed 10,000 Iraqi people in their own country only 95 Americans got slaughtered in the process
only half ? that's bad when someone go to steal someone else country's resources and then call them terrorists..... America is a real terrorist
Got what he fucking deserved
I'm sad that his worthless head didn't explode instead
Thank him for his Service
“I got your six” doesn’t mean “I’m standing behind you, looking over your shoulder”, It means “I’m covering your rear”, IE I’m looking BEHIND you, so no one sneaks up and shoots you in the back.
yeah was hella confused too.
Speaking of war, I remember a story someone told me in the locker room once. During World War II, his grandfather was in a regiment that was supposed to neutralize an anti-tank gone on top of a hill while they were doing so the gun fired and hit a soldier dead center in the chest, the resulting impact blew up the man’s torso and all that was left were two legs and a waist that walked forward a couple times and then fell over. That’s some shell Shocking shit right there.
Holy shit, that’s expected from an anti tank gun used on a soldier but that’s fucking crazy to see and definitely scarring.
Poor man...
@EdwardKenway130 at least it was quick enough he felt no pain
@@falloutfart9917just watching it is enough pain
I heard a very similar story. Someone from my family was at the Don on the side of the Hungarians and he saw someone who's head got blown off and walked a bit forward before collapsing. I can't imagine what it would be like seeing things like this and living with these thoughts after the war
Holy Jesus! The audio design and more specifically the voice chat is insanely good. The other players sound like they are really there. The sounds change with every environment you're in and everything
That sounddesign for the VC is insane
I love the Echo
It's still extremely buggy
4:46 That gave me "Sector is clear. Not clear, NOT CLEAR!" vibes.
Any war game is bound to have SOME controversy due to the real lives lost. In my opinion, games like this offers the younger generation to learn history and not repeat it, so its as essential than reading a history textbook
In America? LOL. Look up what actually happened, more civilians were killed than insurgents or marines combined. This is a propaganda game and I love it for gameplay, hate what we did. As for audio, anyone who has served, knows how bad comms is in theatre. LOL.
"this offers the younger generation to learn history and not repeat it"
So encouraging kids to re-enact a war crime, because that's what the US invasion of Iraq was, is going to help them become pacifists?
Are you really that naive?
@groppodalosio never said to encourage kids to commit war crimes l. You did. Im merely stating that if we dont teach the younger generations all aspects of history, both good and bad, they will bound to repeat the bad.
If you want to censor the bad history, then the problem lies with you and people like you. By the way, next time you want to twist someones words up, just think twice before opening your mouth.
@deltamovieshd9255 civilians were killed in literally every war known to man, yet you have no problem play ww2 games. Like i said, every war game will have controversy due to the real lives lost.
I guess i should add to that: Due to the real lives lost, both civilian and soldiers alike. I didnt know i had to state the obvious to dimwits like yourself. 🙄
Note: i dont care about your feelings or thoughts. Keep it to yourselves. If you have a problem with what i say, just shut the fuck up and look the other way. Like what your parents shouldve taught all of your sorry asses.
Its a shooter game, just enjoy it.
"I'm playing with randoms cause I don't have really any friends"
I understand you bro
Many of theses soldiers and marines that fought in Fallujah didn’t get any real sleep for days during the battle.. Think about that.. most people call out sick to work if they didn’t get any sleep the night prior. Imagine fighting in urban combat against a insurgency that plays dirty with IEDs, snipers, murder holes and human shields and you haven’t slept in 3 days… oh and don’t accidentally shoot any civilians or your own team mates.. thats a court martial
Look up Corporal Antonio Metruccio. He was an Italian soldier in Afghanistan. The first image that should come up in the results is of his face after 72 hours of fighting. His pupils are like pin pricks.
All that adrenaline is keeping their mind sharp 😂
Imo if your okay with a vietnam war game you should have no problem with six days in fallujah. Any criticism of the Iraq war could equally leveled against nam yet no one has any problems with Vietnam games.
Tbf vietnam is also older then iraq and the controversy has decreased in contrast to iraq
@@aeroblitzt9561 well thats true whit the majority of recent conflicts
@@aeroblitzt9561 I'm 20 years old and I wasn't even alive when it started.
@@maayan748I don't think Saddam's army advocate for freedom lol.
Im playing it in literally falujah
The immersion is 101%
Hows the internet there?
Bro’s gon hear gunshots and realize it ain’t the game, that’s crazy 💀💀💀
جاي يسئلك شلونه الانترنت هناك 🤡 لا تكله ينقطع الفجر بسبب الامتحانات lol
☠️😭
What does the average Iraqi think about the war in hindsight. I remember a Marine who was in there in 2004 (I think it was DevilDogGaming) say that Iraqis loved the Americans.
From Fallujah, everything has changed. I hope that peace will prevail among us and the whole world .🇮🇶
Never was in Fallujah, too early for me, but did have a few buddies who were there and have since played it, they told me the most startling to them, was the sound design, it sounded exactly like it did then, the combat the shouts everything about it
i live in fallujah and it's really sound real
I see it as a way of telling the story position of a soldier. I know that they took real combat vets and ask them about their experiences. Because we all know how bad the battle of Falluja was. And to see the conditions in the possible situation is that the soldiers would’ve had to go through. I just think it brings out a lot more respect for the younger generation to see what these guys have went through.
I also know that for the arma 3SOG mod that they took grill Colin bad experience from former members of SOG and told it in a realistic style
the whole reason people liked BF1 story mode so much is that it somewhat showcased what that time was like even if not as realistic by far as Six Days
having a whole misson about of Aussie fought battles was so cool
@@senritsujumpsuit6021 I agree I thought it was cool, but there was some historical inaccuracies.
@@mikenikep5202 yeah the whole mission of being a heavy armor dude was very loosely based off the group that where basically suicide soldiers who nearly all died for their objectives for being just that brave an stubborn by far the most out their part :D
@@senritsujumpsuit6021 there is a movie about it I believe it’s Italian
who else is waiting for the console release, i've hit the writers block in gaming and hopefully this will cure it.
I’ve been waiting for a game like this for a while. Insurgency Sandstorm hit it for a bit but many people don’t use voice chat were playing it like COD and it stopped being fun.
@@brandoncortezemmanuel357 yea after awhile the game became very robotic, and I like the games mechanics and have had the occasional jarringly surprising cinematic firefight, but the repetitive blandness of the game now makes me not motivated to play it. Especially now since a new company has bought the game, less updates are being released and when they do, it feels like a step in reverse.
This game looks realistic especially with its mechanics and I would definitely play all I’d wish it be at least $10 cheaper but $39.99 isn’t that bad for a game like this
Considering it's early access, I am waiting till it add friendly ai and single player options.
It's actually pretty cheap for a game this realistic. Take CoD for example it's twice the price of SDiF
@@amalayperson7208 there's Ground Branch, Ready or Not, Zero Hour and Arma 3, all of which are available at the same or cheaper price range.
These are so good. Really teamwork oriented, tactical, shown in a nice format by you, so I can enjoy the game while continuing to have a skill issue.
Looks amazing! Hope it comes to console at some point like Insurgency did
They said they will once it comes out of early access
It will come out for new gen approximately mid 2024
It will release on console in 2024
“I’m playing with randoms because I don’t have any friends”. I know that feel, bro 😢
My cousin fought in this operation.
She said “it’s great for them to show what we experienced but I hope they don’t show the civilian stuff” it’s mainly people who have not experienced this that say it’s offensive.
If my cousin who was there isn’t offended then why are y’all
those randoms were pretty fun to listen to, it would be cool if you managed to bring them back for more videos.
great video as always, i don't really watch gameplays anymore but this game really got my attention, i looks gritty and doesn't glorify America as the "good guys".
they made this game by interviewing people that were there (marine and iraqi). It was made to portray the battle as it unfolded and what it was like for the men on the ground, not for propaganda as some say.
This is basically the game that Mac & Frank were playing but in VR
the sounds on this game is well made, like explosions and stuff
But extremely buggy
This game was announced for PS2 a long time ago, and controversy happened because "it was too early to make"
It would be cool if they did something similar to sniper elite 5 where another player can invade your game as an enemy and try to kill you
If it didn't have THAT title don't think there would be any problem. Looks like a good tactical team GAME to me. Also this ISN'T the first battle to be put to video games and it won't be the last I'm sure.
Still waiting for bfv end of round themes worst to best
This has to be the most accurate and respectful depiction of what these soldiers went through. I honestly wouldn't be surprised if the devs spoke and worked with architects and soldiers who served to develop the game.
Tbag you know we’re your friends buddy ❤
One thing i will say i feel like that every single game at least ive seen is the way accessory on rails work. Like an olight is gonna light a room up completely, a laser in the dark is a direct beam while in the light its the dot. Scopes the mechanic of still needing to be on target to really hit. Then again these are games and are still art peices.
In 2004, all we had was the Surefire 6P 2 battery incandescent lights, and very few guys had them mounted on rifles. 60 lumens and we were all excited to have that. All this modern LED stuff was driven by this sort of fighting.
I think it’s primary selling point is that it’s controversial. I’m not impressed with the gameplay I’ve seen so far, it looks generic and outdated. If this game was called Urban Warfare 2 nobody would talk about it.
Tbag please make a video ranking every bf1 operation from worst to best. That would be sick
"Most Controversial game ever" bro has never heard of Knights of Al-Aqsa Mosque...
Would love to see more gameplay.
First mission is to find and secure The Fallujah Fire Hose.
4:41 The line “watch out it’s Saddam” idk but it was kinda funny to me💀
Invasion Simulator
Tbag you are the best european youtuber
Regardless of everything else this game is equal parts beautiful and terrifying. That dark corridor you're staring down...That was someone's home, that someone's life. Now it is nothing but a dark and terrifying unknown.
I CANNOT WAIT FOR THIS GAME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Edit: it comes out in 2024 so it looks like I'm gonna have to wait :/
I’ve been playing this non-stop, it’s already a great game, can’t wait to see how it improves since it’s only an early release.
0:54 did anyone else hear that echo in the audio? That's really cool
4:45
Nice video TBAG❤ first!
I would most definitely disagree that this is "the most controversial" game ever released. Lots of older games that are just in poor taste, like a game where you play as the columbine shooters.
More than this game being controversial, it's interesting. It's interesting and it gets the thumbs up of a lot of Iraq war vets. Like this isn't ready or not, you aren't playing as a CQC specialist and elite operator, you're playing as a 20 year old Lance corporal with a full length M16A4 or M249 trying to clear dark houses with flashlights. This was the battle that defined MOUT training in the 21st century and what really started to shift squad load outs and weaponry to being more compact. As for the controversy itself, it immortalizes the guys that fought there. Coming out with a game a few short years after the battle wasn't the most sensitive idea, but the wars done and enough time has passed that I think we can start looking at it differently. We remember Vietnam and WWII with video games as a medium and I think Fallujah can be moved into a similar status as to those conflicts
Shizzz I feel chills running down my spine when you almost smoked your own teammate
I love this game, can’t wait for when it comes on Xbox next year. Nice to see you play it
2k people dead looking for weapons of mass destruction in Iraq for some reason that didn't exist because some Saudis and Egyptians flew some planes into some buildings resulting an no one getting arrested and charged. Bad to the bone
I mean yeah we didn't have wmds but how did Egypt and Saudi fit into this equation exactly?
@personaltreat5472
The 19 men who were responsible for the September 11 attacks were from Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Egypt and the United Arab emirates
I suggest you play this game with nano
i love this game , i cannot get passed the sniper mission😭 but it’s so fun
Enjoy the game, but it is too difficult. The AI are super smart, I love that, the game makes you think and move but they are also all marksmen. All of the AI are perfect shots making it impossible for a single player to enjoy the game. I played it for about 3 hours and the most kills I got was 5-6, found the mortar launcher several times but always got killed because they would move and by the time you tried to follow, another would shot you from behind or at a distance. Even teams of 4 that are excellent at communication are having major difficulty. I think the game should allow the player to make us aware but also remember, we are players trying to enjoy a game. Either ease up on the difficulty or give us difficulty levels. My only complaint.
I tend to agree, or atleast some option to play it solo with AI scaled acordingly so I can get to grips with it. The guys I played with (randoms) where for the most part super chill but I was very concious that I was fucking things up and costing the team (I like to think of myself as descent at FPS games too). Somewhere that I can go learn it on my own before wrecking other peoples games would be appreciated.
@@Nebulous361 yeah, you can choose to play solo and it is tougher than playing any Dark Souls game, the most difficult Boss in Elden Ring, and forget about the Romper Room Call of Duty and BF, this game is smart and brutal. I have been watching excellent shooter gamers play in groups, guys that are excellent and communication get destroyed. I don't know who is testing this and deciding how hard to make the difficulty, but they need to ease up because the casual gamer like myself bought in to support the cause, get a glimpse of and understanding of, but damn I would like to enjoy the game beyond 4-5 kills. Love it, but freakin AI. That's why I too am still playing solo. I suck at communication, but from what I see, everyone dies, just be polite and respectful.
That looks like a solid feeling tilt/lean mechanic.
Bro the people calling it pro US propaganda dont realize the fact that every cod game is just propaganda
What about the video ranking every tree in Battlefield 1 ????????
Looks great. For a CS mod circa 2006
This looks way better than a 2006 cs mod tf you on about
I finally understood why my uncle would not talk about phantom fury...we could never understand what it was like
Remember guys if this game ever gets banned from steam remember the game hatred is still on there
As an Iraqi that game sounds pretty offensive, and historically inaccurate but other than that this game’s dope with realistic gameplay
A close friend of mine fought in this battle, thankfully survived, and told me what a hellhole it was. He refuses to acknowledge this games' existence.
an yet almost vet towards any other conflict feel acknowledged by games like this wonder if your friend would bar fight other Vets over this
0:39 Don't worry I'll be your friend Tbag
Damn this game seems so good finally a game that is based on reality likenthe objective reads something about assaulting al qaeda bases or some the fact they use real names is very nice
I hope we can play as al mujahdeen and fight for freedom from america :3
That would be actually cool, have multiplayer where you can play as insurgents. Asymmetric warfare would be fun.
@@evilleader1991 exactly like CS or CS:GO
@@bouakkazsamir6778bro really thinks he's in the right calling people who defend their country terrorists goo job retard
Not even close to the most controversial game ever made. Postal, Manhunt, GTA3, Spec Ops: The Line, and plenty more were far more controversial.
"Welcome back soldier."
You mean, Marine.
Would be a Great affect, when Throwing a grenade in a Room. Some dust and Stuff Coming out of it
people calling SDIF insensitive for the lives lost i mean yes definitely but tell that to the other millions of games recreating WW1, WW2 the first and second indochina wars like i dont understand making games controversial
the remark is silly when you think about how no one got super uncomfortable about BF1 using Arabian locations, Aussies and Black Skinned Troops in its game
i heard "Thr Battle of Fellujah" and the first thing i thought abou was "The Clone Wars
Just so you know. We don’t call the m249 a m249. We just call it a saw.
come on man it's 1:30 am
Can't wait for the sequel "Six days in Bakhmut" where you play as the Russian army clearing the city of Ukrainian insurgency
Cry about it
I will enjoy killing incompetent Ukrainian troopers.
@hinokassimp7734 incompetent and Ukrainian soldiers don't belong in the same paragraph, nevermind sentence. Thats painfully obvious
wouldn't be very realistic to play as a russian soldier killing multiple ukrainian soldiers
It's as respectful as a video game can be. People should stop complaining and get perspective on the thousands of video games before it that haven't given a thought to the historical accuracy or respect of a game depicting a historical conflict. These games are found in and out of the mainstream.
**Cough, Vanguard, cough**
Hey man, nice video, good to see you branch out and play more varied games, don't let the hateful comments get to you, it's just people who cannot tell apart reality from entertainment.
I can think of far more controversial games. Grezzo 2 in particular comes to mind.
4:41 My parents were in iraq at that time…😢 Its so sad they had to endure the pain of Saddam
4:43 Now im happy
Did people just forget that we made games based on conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan while they were happening?
I’m looking forward to playing this one! 👍🏻
i love this game cause i can go around just capping my teammates, for realism reasons
If they add online gameplay like squad it will be the greatest game forever
Looks cool. but it is definitely controversial. Love ya T Bag ❤
It isn't controversial you snowflake
yet no other conflict is hated by Vets for being in game form really no one got livid over BF1 using stuff all over WW1 from Aussies to Arabian conflicts etc
Ill wait for the multiplyer pvp and monsters mode hehe
We need TBAG to review battle bit remastered it's really good
"I'm playing with randoms because i don't have any friends...enjoy! 😢"
I am playing with randoms because I dont have any friends. I feel you bro😭😭.
I wish I could buy this game man 😭
But yk what else I wish ? You ranking all bf1 operations from worst to best
no way, TBAG has a pc but still plays all the games on a ps5
He's a loyal PlayStation homie ig
Hard to imagine I was only 3 when this was going down
Ptsd simulator 2023
How have you played evey other fps except battlebit. It's actually unreal. Come on. Next video needs to be a battlebit vid
did you know of the game The Finals its from X Battlefield devs its quick action destructible 3V3 matches
you can plow through a building grapple hook into a shotgun shot trick shot
Random people think it is insensitive and it shouldnt be a game
Meanwhile soldiers who were there and returned helped work on game because they think it is great idea
Nice video
I heard that the AbuGraib DLC is coming out in 2024!! yeeeey
me here again asking for historically accurate doors in bf1 ranked from worst to best.