Это видео недоступно.
Сожалеем об этом.

SDS_PAGE_ Quantification_ Simple way_ Gel analyzer

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 23 мар 2021
  • SDS-PAGE : A simple technique to separate proteins on the basis of molecular wt. This video will help to analyze your SDS-PAGE gel. This is the easiest way by using Gel analyzer 19.1

Комментарии • 5

  • @srikoerniati1685
    @srikoerniati1685 3 года назад +2

    Thank you so much

  • @fouziakhan2964
    @fouziakhan2964 3 года назад +4

    awesome
    but your voice isnt clear

  • @kinkpelionel3287
    @kinkpelionel3287 2 года назад +1

    thank you Sir. Very helpful.
    Please, may I know which software did you use ? and how can we get it?
    Thanks.

    • @md.arifhussain8109
      @md.arifhussain8109  2 года назад

      I have used gel analyzer 19 a. You can download it. It’s free 😊.

  • @hnevko
    @hnevko 11 месяцев назад +1

    Numbered subjectivity ...nothing else. It seems like you just put some numbers to your own subjectivity, the bands that you detected manually by a look. The same effect can be achieved in Windows Paint by painting dots. I don't find this sort of software useful, really. I think the main goal is to detect bands automatically based on some objective manners. But how to choose which method is right? Lets say you choose "rolling ball" to detect bands and then you set some parameters to determine the boundaries between "what is a band" and "what is not a band anymore". But you decide? Again subjectivity. You only put numbers to it, so it looks cool and scientific :) Anyway, it could be nice if you find those three parameters to detect bands, and then apply it for all samples. But when you have different gel images, there is a difference between them which means you must find specific parameters for each image. And that's the problem. You end up in detecting your bands manually, not automatically, so basically it didn't save your time. Really, Windows Paint+manually dotting the bands with different colours is easiest and quickest way... and still not worse than using software.