But he assumes an year as 365 days in other places but concludes Rama's rule of 11 thousand years as 11 thousand days ! Different scales for different datas !
He thinks he is super intelligent than Valmiki and Kambar. If you really want to listen ramayana from the perspective of Valmiki, please listen to swami velukkudi's upanyasam
ruclips.net/video/AhPZPqzd8Dk/видео.htmlsi=L_Pl8qZTnOvIOZbC (Sri Sri Satyatma teertha swami , of SriMadwaMadwacharya moola maha samsthana Sri Uttaradhi Math , the one who does pooja to Moola rama , the rama idol which sri rama did pooja during his avatara, with tamil subtitiles ) and ruclips.net/video/YiO9IWULc9U/видео.htmlfeature=shared (Sri Sri Vishwaprassana teertha swami of Sri Pejawar mut , one of Udupi 8 muts and the swamiji who actually did the Sri ramaprathista in ayodhya and current trustee of Sri Rama jenma bhumi trustee Ayodhya) , have given a very logical sastra backed reply for all the points and also more .Sri uttaradhi math swamiji has formed a special research team of well learned pundits and engineers and have collected information from the team . A Madwa pundit is ready to give clarity in this matter and translate both the swamijees thoughts on the topic
@@parthasarathygovindarajan9004 Definitely Velukkudi is a great scholar. Did you hear Dushyanth anywhere say he is intelligent than Velukkudi? Just becoz he is young and has given an age of Rama based on Valmiki, now he is bad for you? How weak is your faith sir? That’s why young kids and youth don’t believe what people like you say! He is the hero of younger generations and has inspired many kids to read scriptures and Sanatana Dharma. You don’t even know 1% of his work for Sanatana Dharma. He is is the future! Whether you like it or not!
Your reply only shows that you have listened to all his interviews. In one of his interviews to Rangaraj Pandey he has said that Lord Krishna can be considered as Brahmachari if he abstained from any physical relation during the times prescribed by vedas with any of wives. He is not aware of the simple fact that Brahmam's thirumeni is Suddha Satvam and therefore he will not seek any worldly pleasure. This is an abhacharam he has committed against our Lord and this was the last time. I can go like that and his faulty research of Ramayan is a classic example. I have never said that he has spoken against velukkudi swami. I only requested the viewers to follow Vellukkudi swamy to get grasp of our Sanatana Dharma. Despite all the above explanation, if you feel that he is worthy of following, please continue to do so at your risk of being part of the Abhacharams he commit
@@parthasarathygovindarajan9004 @ that’s your misinterpretation. He is quoting exactly from Vedas. Prove that he is wrong! In Mahabharata itself, Krishna has proved that while giving life to Parikshit! Don’t Jump to conclusions . I had listened to DS’s guru Karunkaracharya as well, and that’s his words for Krishna’s Brahmacharyam. That’s why I say, please get TC from RN’s hate school and join some other Sanatana Dharma school to get the big picture. I listen to Velukkudi, DS, APN, and also Damodhara Deekshithar, Dr Venkatesh. None of these upanyasakars talk bad of each other. Why are you followers doing this Bhagavatha Abacharam along with RN? RN is getting punished for his karma for talking ill of DS, Velukkudi, Kanchi Periyava, Vivekananda, Jayendra Saraswati Periyava, Sadhguru, Sri Sri Ravishankar etc. do not support this campaign!
Your 3rd reply exposes your poor understanding of vedas and srimad bhaghavatam. To begin with the rule prescribed in vedas can be applied only to Jeevathmas. Furthermore, even a mukthathma who is liberated would get a body devoid of any physical properties. Long story short, even the liberated souls will not have any lust nor any genitals and so to say that Lord Krishna had refrained himself from physical relation with his wives on the days and at times prohibited by vedas is abnoxious. If this theory is probagated by any contemporary acharya, he has to be rejected with contempt. I feel there is no need to extend this and leave the entire matter at the lotus feet of Swami Ramunuja.
@18:25+ the issue of age of Rama is not a big challenge as that of the time period, actually. It's acceptable for many, including myself that Rama would have lived for 100 years hale and healthy like a good human being. Was Rama 7000+ years old or 70000 years old or 7000000 years old?!
Have a question though. Why does Valmiki Ramayana mention Ashvamedha yagna as 10000 years but Vanavaasa as 12 years. Shouldn’t that be equated too, based on 1year=1day?
@@sriramsourirajan3067 The interpretation of sloka should be viewed with previous Slokas and subsequent Slokas. For each interpretation, the acharyas have got pramaanika evidence. As an example, the sanyaasis have to observe what is called Chatur maasya vratham. This is that the sanyasins have to stay in a place for 4 months. This normally comes during Greeshma Ruthu and to extend up to Varsha Ruthu. But taking into consideration several factors, this vrat is observed for 4 pakshas ( 2 months) treating each paksha as a month. Like that there might have been a way of calculating the period in those days Whichever position you want to take, you take it. Ultimately nobody questions the content and veracity of the Kavyam. All those who believe,agree Rama was the hero, his wife was Seetha and it was Ravan, the demon who abducted Sita. Does DS say differently. Some 50 years ago, I have heard from Sri.Agnihotram Thaathachariar, a scholar par excellence narrating the Itihasa in different styles as a Religious Text, as a Dharmic Sastra, and using the language of metaphor ( உருவக அணி). All the three explanations were widely received. It should be noted that Thaathachariar was very closely connected with Kanchi Seer ( Maha periyavar)
The problem is not just this 11000 it's basically the the belief it brings with it?! This 11000 is just 7 slokas out of 24000 slokas that's like less than .0001% and people are blind. People should search and read this super criticism - "Dushyanth Sridhar's Ramayanam: A Modern Masala "
@13:25+ Sita Mata telling she lived happily 12 years - is wrongly quoted as there are northern Ramayanam versions that say 1 year rather than 12 years. The point is - these are really insignificant. How do we know that this is so?! It's not taken as a significant revelation in the retold version in Mahabharata - it was just told that's it pretty old time story of Dwapara Yuga. That's it.
We sanatanis worshipping Ramayanam, Mahabharatam for developing bakthi rasam in our heart. By bakthi only common people will easily accept saranagathi tatvam and attains moksham. Research articles will not serve the purpose of bakthi for common peoples. So my humble opinion is that, one should not promote his own research article, in the name of Valmiki Ramayana. Story and research are different. Please change the book title as " research on Rama's age" and publish it, then nobody having the issue.
Bhakthi without knowledge is called blind faith! We in Sanatan tradition, believe in Gyan with Bhakthi. Don’t believe in blind Bhakthi as the Abrahamic religion. Blind faith may be good for you! But nor for future generations. Younger generations are losing faith because they think Ramayana and Mahabharata are myth. I totally support Dushyanth as a parent of 2 young kids. He has succeeded in bringing many kids like mine to Bhakthi. This is also a service to sanatana Dharma. We should not let go our history. Btw his book is not about Rama’s age. Please buy his book and read. It’s just 1 line cited as per research done by Jayesree Saranathan.
@@User01029 Dear sir, knowledge and research are very different aspects. In science world research is necessary before accepting anything as you may reach the evidence physically. But in religious beliefs, we have to go behind physical proofs, we should accept acharya's words, we can ask doubts as arjuna did in every possible way. But it is not possible for us do research in invisible things like atma, manas, inthriyam etc. so the fact is, we may attain paramatma through bakthi only and not by research. So my point is, whether it is Ramayanam or mahabharata, developing bakthi is important than developing research mindset. Don't try to prove everything scientifically. Tulsidasar, Ramanujar, Tukaram, sabarima and many devotees reached paramatma through devotion only, there is no single story about scientists reached paramatma.
@@User01029 if children asked about scientific explanation, clearly tell them science does not have the power to explain paramatma's majesty. Tell them bakthi sathana is the best tool for understanding paramatma. Please think sir, if science has the capability to explain God, then we can pray towards science. Science is one small aspect in God's creation.
@@k.dineshkannana.kesavarama7749 That’s one way of escapism. Today’s kids are smart and if you say like that they either will become atheists or just follow for name sake. You can’t blame the kids either. It’s the parents like me and the peers around us. And I feel people like DS are actually giving the right answers that help the kids to stick to our Sampradaya. I have practically felt that in my experience.
22:10 The answer to all the critics who question 11000 yrs is given at this time. Anyone who came to this channel from RN’s school, jump to this time stamp and you will get your answers.
this is answered and countered by the ruclips.net/video/AhPZPqzd8Dk/видео.htmlsi=L_Pl8qZTnOvIOZbC (Sri Sri Satyatma teertha swami , of SriMadwaMadwacharya moola maha samsthana Sri Uttaradhi Math , the one who does pooja to Moola rama , the rama idol which sri rama did pooja during his avatara, with tamil subtitiles ) and ruclips.net/video/YiO9IWULc9U/видео.htmlfeature=shared (Sri Sri Vishwaprassana teertha swami of Sri Pejawar mut , one of Udupi 8 muts and the swamiji who actually did the Sri ramaprathista in ayodhya and current trustee of Sri Rama jenma bhumi trustee Ayodhya) . pls hear it with tamil subtitles and translation
Rangarajan Narasimhan clearly explained each and everthing and interviewd all scholars. Further he has proved that rhe calculation done by Dushyand Sridhar is wrong .This Dushyant Sridhar has blocked Sri Rangarajan Narasimhan,since he cannot answer to Rangarajan Narasimhan
Why shud we spew hatred on a person just coz he is famous. If anyone thinks he is more knowledgeable and can refute Dushyants theories, they shud also post a video refuting the same. IMO, an ambassador of Sanatana dharma doesn't deserve such lowly comments.
ruclips.net/video/AhPZPqzd8Dk/видео.htmlsi=L_Pl8qZTnOvIOZbC (Sri Sri Satyatma teertha swami , of SriMadwaMadwacharya moola maha samsthana Sri Uttaradhi Math , the one who does pooja to Moola rama , the rama idol which sri rama did pooja during his avatara, with tamil subtitiles ) and ruclips.net/video/YiO9IWULc9U/видео.htmlfeature=shared (Sri Sri Vishwaprassana teertha swami of Sri Pejawar mut , one of Udupi 8 muts and the swamiji who actually did the Sri ramaprathista in ayodhya and current trustee of Sri Rama jenma bhumi trustee Ayodhya) , have given a very logical sastra backed reply for all the points and also more . 2 great Sanyasees of this century has replied to him, and DS knows kannada very well. you can get yourself cleared . He is not an ambassadors of SD, acharyas and acharyas can only be ambassadors of SD no one else. Sri uttaradhi math swamiji has formed a special research team of well learned pundits and engineers and have collected information from the team . A Madwa pundit is ready to give clarity in this matter and translate both the swamijees thoughts on the topic. Worst case scenario im personally ready to give clarity in this matter
Utter waste interview with this person, Rangarajan Narasimhan interviewed with many scholars and no one agree this yuga calculation and strongly believe Ramayana period is different and cannot compare with Kali Yuga. These ppl trying to demote Hinduism and try to bring near to BC/AD period. Pls avoid this
@@JRRajavarman All the scholars RN has interviewed were not absolutely categorical. They more or less parroted that this was what poorvacharyas said. Perhaps they might be reluctant to enter into argument with RN fearing he will defame them also. See what happened to the Jeer of Sriperumpudur and other two. They did not want to escalate controversy.
@@raghunathansrinivasaraghav6455Mr Do you agree that the jeeyar done is correct.your problem is not this, why it was disposed to public.Mr Rangarajan Narasimhan is a straightforward person and he never afraid of anybody and he is a God fear man and he is quoting all through Sasthram and samprathayam.
@@srinivasanchellapillais418 You are under a myth. What wrong did the jeyar do ? It is normal practice for any Madaathipathi, aadheenam, aacharyaas to visit the homes of people when invited. In fact, we had invited the 44th Jeeyar of Ahobila Mutt to grace and bless us on the occasion of my sister's gruhapravesam. He did come and blessed us. My brother invited the Sri Villiputhur Jeeyar for his son's marriage and the Jeeyar turned up to bless the couple. If RN wanted to expose the DMK first family, he should have taken Udhayanidhi head on for his abusive comments on Sansthana Dharma by filing case in High Court. Instead, he made the Jeeyars pawns in his Play. First of all, he should not have dragged them in this. Secondly, he should have got prior express consent from the Sri Perumpudur Jeer about his intention to record the conversation. Again he should have obtained the permission from the jeer for posting it Social Media. Did RN played the audio clip to the Jeer and informed him about putting it in public platform. This is gross betrayal and breach of trust. Thirdly, his interview itself was in bad taste. Asking the Jeer uncomfortable questions that whether he ate anything in UN's house is outrageous and atrocious. Is he not aware that the Sanyasins follow strict food habits ? Where is the need for that question ,? His another comment that " முழுக்க நனைந்தபின் முக்காடு எதற்கு"."சம்பாவனை கொடுத்தார்களா". It is totally inappropriate . I am shuddered to think of consequences that may befall the Jeer/s. If the case is argued In court and Jeer refutes to the conversation, RN will ask for forensic audit of the tape. If the tape turns out to be true, Jeer will be accused of lying in the court. This may lead to unpleasant consequences. The Sriperumbudur Mutt will remove the jeer from his post and will be expelled. His life after expulsion will be horrible. This also RN knows. Is this not Acharya Droham? I wish his ( RN) followers ponder over and desist from supporting RN in future.
@@raghunathansrinivasaraghav6455 ruclips.net/video/AhPZPqzd8Dk/видео.htmlsi=L_Pl8qZTnOvIOZbC (Sri Sri Satyatma teertha swami , of SriMadwaMadwacharya moola maha samsthana Sri Uttaradhi Math , the one who does pooja to Moola rama , the rama idol which sri rama did pooja during his avatara, with tamil subtitiles ) and ruclips.net/video/YiO9IWULc9U/видео.htmlfeature=shared (Sri Sri Vishwaprassana teertha swami of Sri Pejawar mut , one of Udupi 8 muts and the swamiji who actually did the Sri ramaprathista in ayodhya and current trustee of Sri Rama jenma bhumi trustee Ayodhya) , have given a very logical sastra backed reply for all the points and also more .Sri uttaradhi math swamiji has formed a special research team of well learned pundits and engineers and have collected information from the team . A Madwa pundit is ready to give clarity in this matter and translate both the swamijees thoughts on the topic. Worst case scenario im personally ready to give clarity in this matter. Pls do contact me personally regarding this matter, your audience who are very good bakthimans in general needs to hear the thoughts of 2 great peetas. My phone number 7904649432 . pls do whatsapp
விஞ்ஞான பூர்வமாக என் கேள்வி. (இது மடத்தனமான கேள்வி என்றும் நினைக்கலாம்). சுமார் 80 ஆண்டுகளுக்கு முன் ஆஙகிலேயன் இருந்த காலத்தில், நம் சராசரி வயது 30 வருஷம். இன்றைக்கு அதே சராசரி வயது 60 முதல் 80 வரை. இது எப்டி சாத்தியம்? இதுபோன்ற அந்த யுகங்களில் ஆயுள் நீண்டு இருந்திருக்கலாம். அல்லவா???. ஆயுள் என்பது நம் வாழ்க்கை முறையினால் நிர்ணயிக்கப் படலாம்.அடுத்து கணக்கு வித்தியாசம் படலாம். நாமெல்லாம் இப்போ metric arithmetical தானே பயன் படுத்துகிறார். உண்மையான வேதத்தில் உள்ள கணித சாஸ்த்திரம் உஸ்பெகிஸ்தான், சரியாக இருக்குமோ???. அறிஞர்களின் பார்வைக்கு விடுகிறேன்.
Worst question is the starting one - how to live and hiw not to live - and saying that Ramayanam is for former and Mahabharata for later. As if a summary. Check if that's true. Is Ravan, Surpanaka, Vali, what are these examples in Ramayanam then?! And in Mahabharata what is the life of Pandavas - and many more - how to live life. It's called confirmation biases because of some summary provided by some fellow as a selling.😢. Wish people realise before it's too late
Kinly look at dushyanth's Sri Suktam youtube video and the opening image. Isn't it nasty to portray Mahalakshmi the 🙏 mother of all mothers that way? I told him many times but he seems to be incorrigible. Would he portray his mother, sister or wife like that? Nasty fellow
@14:10+ the story of marriage before puberty is all humbug, even though that is true, even before 50 years or 100 yrs in my own family i know what was practised - the girl was not sent to husband house rather retained in her mother's house. Read Shri Sharadha Devi life, when she went to join Shri Ramakrishna Paramhansa
Unwanted research. If 11000 years can't be accepted how u accept chadur dandam kajam divyam. 4 dantha elephants . What is the age of 4 danta elephant as per accepted theories. We can ask so many questions in various other aspects to disprove his findings.
@@User01029 ruclips.net/video/AhPZPqzd8Dk/видео.htmlsi=L_Pl8qZTnOvIOZbC ruclips.net/video/YiO9IWULc9U/видео.htmlfeature=shared all that is done and dusted by these two
Are you saying that there should not be any discussion over the matter? You may not agree with their thoughts and opinions, but it does not mean they cannot have one.
@@menagamaniyan8808 don't you understand now the age of Sri ramar and whether he ate veg/non veg is the only thing being discussed?Is it the main core thing which vyasa maharishi wanted people to learn from Sri Ramayanam? Discuss??...we should not promote/ do discussions on topic which creates confusion and which doesn't give the moral/value.
@@rajinarayanan4742 there are a number of videos on the dharma Lord Rama stood for. And, they have attracted thousands of views, as well. If the public is interested in knowing if Rama ate meat or not, we do have scholars to present that issue as well. One cannot try and impose censorship on what to discuss and what not to. Fortunately, we do not live in China or Russia. Sanathan Dharma will continue to thrive in this land. This is the Dharma bhoomi.
@@menagamaniyan8808So you, the intellectuals want to create confusions amongst Hindus and drive them to discuss Sri Rama's Age issue instead of discussing His Great characters.? You want to create some space for others (atheists & other religious ppl) to make fun of our Sanathan Dharma.? *'MunnOr sonna VArthai thappAmey'* is our Sri Vaishnava's main principles. So you the Intellectuals should spend your valuable time to make our Dharma to reach more and more general Hindus especially in lower levels, instead of researching / preaching unwanted stuff like this. Rajeshkumar Narayanan
For many, their problem is not the answer but Dushyanth, but he is doing very fair job 🎉.
But he assumes an year as 365 days in other places but concludes Rama's rule of 11 thousand years as 11 thousand days ! Different scales for different datas !
Jai Shri Ram
He thinks he is super intelligent than Valmiki and Kambar.
If you really want to listen ramayana from the perspective of Valmiki, please listen to swami velukkudi's upanyasam
ruclips.net/video/AhPZPqzd8Dk/видео.htmlsi=L_Pl8qZTnOvIOZbC (Sri Sri Satyatma teertha swami , of SriMadwaMadwacharya moola maha samsthana Sri Uttaradhi Math , the one who does pooja to Moola rama , the rama idol which sri rama did pooja during his avatara, with tamil subtitiles ) and ruclips.net/video/YiO9IWULc9U/видео.htmlfeature=shared (Sri Sri Vishwaprassana teertha swami of Sri Pejawar mut , one of Udupi 8 muts and the swamiji who actually did the Sri ramaprathista in ayodhya and current trustee of Sri Rama jenma bhumi trustee Ayodhya) , have given a very logical sastra backed reply for all the points and also more .Sri uttaradhi math swamiji has formed a special research team of well learned pundits and engineers and have collected information from the team . A Madwa pundit is ready to give clarity in this matter and translate both the swamijees thoughts on the topic
@@parthasarathygovindarajan9004 Definitely Velukkudi is a great scholar. Did you hear Dushyanth anywhere say he is intelligent than Velukkudi? Just becoz he is young and has given an age of Rama based on Valmiki, now he is bad for you? How weak is your faith sir? That’s why young kids and youth don’t believe what people like you say! He is the hero of younger generations and has inspired many kids to read scriptures and Sanatana Dharma. You don’t even know 1% of his work for Sanatana Dharma. He is is the future! Whether you like it or not!
Your reply only shows that you have listened to all his interviews. In one of his interviews to Rangaraj Pandey he has said that Lord Krishna can be considered as Brahmachari if he abstained from any physical relation during the times prescribed by vedas with any of wives. He is not aware of the simple fact that Brahmam's thirumeni is Suddha Satvam and therefore he will not seek any worldly pleasure. This is an abhacharam he has committed against our Lord and this was the last time. I can go like that and his faulty research of Ramayan is a classic example. I have never said that he has spoken against velukkudi swami. I only requested the viewers to follow Vellukkudi swamy to get grasp of our Sanatana Dharma. Despite all the above explanation, if you feel that he is worthy of following, please continue to do so at your risk of being part of the Abhacharams he commit
@@parthasarathygovindarajan9004 @ that’s your misinterpretation. He is quoting exactly from Vedas. Prove that he is wrong! In Mahabharata itself, Krishna has proved that while giving life to Parikshit! Don’t Jump to conclusions . I had listened to DS’s guru Karunkaracharya as well, and that’s his words for Krishna’s Brahmacharyam. That’s why I say, please get TC from RN’s hate school and join some other Sanatana Dharma school to get the big picture. I listen to Velukkudi, DS, APN, and also Damodhara Deekshithar, Dr Venkatesh. None of these upanyasakars talk bad of each other. Why are you followers doing this Bhagavatha Abacharam along with RN? RN is getting punished for his karma for talking ill of DS, Velukkudi, Kanchi Periyava, Vivekananda, Jayendra Saraswati Periyava, Sadhguru, Sri Sri Ravishankar etc. do not support this campaign!
Your 3rd reply exposes your poor understanding of vedas and srimad bhaghavatam. To begin with the rule prescribed in vedas can be applied only to Jeevathmas. Furthermore, even a mukthathma who is liberated would get a body devoid of any physical properties. Long story short, even the liberated souls will not have any lust nor any genitals and so to say that Lord Krishna had refrained himself from physical relation with his wives on the days and at times prohibited by vedas is abnoxious. If this theory is probagated by any contemporary acharya, he has to be rejected with contempt. I feel there is no need to extend this and leave the entire matter at the lotus feet of Swami Ramunuja.
@18:25+ the issue of age of Rama is not a big challenge as that of the time period, actually. It's acceptable for many, including myself that Rama would have lived for 100 years hale and healthy like a good human being.
Was Rama 7000+ years old or 70000 years old or 7000000 years old?!
Have a question though. Why does Valmiki Ramayana mention Ashvamedha yagna as 10000 years but Vanavaasa as 12 years. Shouldn’t that be equated too, based on 1year=1day?
Carefully follow the conversation. You will get the reply.
Does dushyant says kaliyuga will be only 1183 years? If one year= one day@@raghunathansrinivasaraghav6455
Yes, that Allegorical
It may be due to the rhyme of sloka or due to the poetic meter which he used that in one place he meant varsha as 1 day and in other as 1 year.
@@sriramsourirajan3067
The interpretation of sloka should be viewed with previous Slokas and subsequent Slokas. For each interpretation, the acharyas have got pramaanika evidence. As an example, the sanyaasis have to observe what is called Chatur maasya vratham. This is that the sanyasins have to stay in a place for 4 months. This normally comes during Greeshma Ruthu and to extend up to Varsha Ruthu. But taking into consideration several factors, this vrat is observed for
4 pakshas ( 2 months) treating each paksha as a month. Like that there might have been a way of calculating the period in those days
Whichever position you want to take, you take it. Ultimately nobody questions the content and veracity of the Kavyam. All those who believe,agree Rama was the hero, his wife was Seetha and it was Ravan, the demon who abducted Sita.
Does DS say differently.
Some 50 years ago, I have heard from Sri.Agnihotram Thaathachariar, a scholar par excellence narrating the Itihasa in different styles
as a Religious Text, as a Dharmic Sastra, and using the language of metaphor ( உருவக அணி).
All the three explanations were widely received. It should be noted that Thaathachariar was very closely connected with Kanchi Seer
( Maha periyavar)
Jai sriram
I thought ratnamala is trying to do justice....but hidden agenda with dushyant. Waste of time. Dushyanth is not an archeologist or historian...
Dushyanth sridhar should also be listened, he is good also
The problem is not just this 11000 it's basically the the belief it brings with it?! This 11000 is just 7 slokas out of 24000 slokas that's like less than .0001% and people are blind.
People should search and read this super criticism -
"Dushyanth Sridhar's Ramayanam: A Modern Masala "
@13:25+ Sita Mata telling she lived happily 12 years - is wrongly quoted as there are northern Ramayanam versions that say 1 year rather than 12 years. The point is - these are really insignificant.
How do we know that this is so?! It's not taken as a significant revelation in the retold version in Mahabharata - it was just told that's it pretty old time story of Dwapara Yuga. That's it.
We sanatanis worshipping Ramayanam, Mahabharatam for developing bakthi rasam in our heart. By bakthi only common people will easily accept saranagathi tatvam and attains moksham. Research articles will not serve the purpose of bakthi for common peoples. So my humble opinion is that, one should not promote his own research article, in the name of Valmiki Ramayana. Story and research are different. Please change the book title as " research on Rama's age" and publish it, then nobody having the issue.
Bhakthi without knowledge is called blind faith! We in Sanatan tradition, believe in Gyan with Bhakthi. Don’t believe in blind Bhakthi as the Abrahamic religion. Blind faith may be good for you! But nor for future generations. Younger generations are losing faith because they think Ramayana and Mahabharata are myth. I totally support Dushyanth as a parent of 2 young kids. He has succeeded in bringing many kids like mine to Bhakthi. This is also a service to sanatana Dharma. We should not let go our history. Btw his book is not about Rama’s age. Please buy his book and read. It’s just 1 line cited as per research done by Jayesree Saranathan.
@@User01029 Dear sir, knowledge and research are very different aspects. In science world research is necessary before accepting anything as you may reach the evidence physically. But in religious beliefs, we have to go behind physical proofs, we should accept acharya's words, we can ask doubts as arjuna did in every possible way. But it is not possible for us do research in invisible things like atma, manas, inthriyam etc. so the fact is, we may attain paramatma through bakthi only and not by research. So my point is, whether it is Ramayanam or mahabharata, developing bakthi is important than developing research mindset. Don't try to prove everything scientifically. Tulsidasar, Ramanujar, Tukaram, sabarima and many devotees reached paramatma through devotion only, there is no single story about scientists reached paramatma.
@@User01029 if children asked about scientific explanation, clearly tell them science does not have the power to explain paramatma's majesty. Tell them bakthi sathana is the best tool for understanding paramatma. Please think sir, if science has the capability to explain God, then we can pray towards science. Science is one small aspect in God's creation.
@@k.dineshkannana.kesavarama7749
That’s one way of escapism. Today’s kids are smart and if you say like that they either will become atheists or just follow for name sake. You can’t blame the kids either. It’s the parents like me and the peers around us. And I feel people like DS are actually giving the right answers that help the kids to stick to our Sampradaya. I have practically felt that in my experience.
22:10 The answer to all the critics who question 11000 yrs is given at this time. Anyone who came to this channel from RN’s school, jump to this time stamp and you will get your answers.
this is answered and countered by the ruclips.net/video/AhPZPqzd8Dk/видео.htmlsi=L_Pl8qZTnOvIOZbC (Sri Sri Satyatma teertha swami , of SriMadwaMadwacharya moola maha samsthana Sri Uttaradhi Math , the one who does pooja to Moola rama , the rama idol which sri rama did pooja during his avatara, with tamil subtitiles ) and ruclips.net/video/YiO9IWULc9U/видео.htmlfeature=shared (Sri Sri Vishwaprassana teertha swami of Sri Pejawar mut , one of Udupi 8 muts and the swamiji who actually did the Sri ramaprathista in ayodhya and current trustee of Sri Rama jenma bhumi trustee Ayodhya) . pls hear it with tamil subtitles and translation
Excellent wonderful superb
Thanks a lot
Rangarajan Narasimhan clearly explained each and everthing and interviewd all scholars. Further he has proved that rhe calculation done by Dushyand Sridhar is wrong .This Dushyant Sridhar has blocked Sri Rangarajan Narasimhan,since he cannot answer to Rangarajan Narasimhan
11:04
ஒருவரின் தனிப்பட்ட நம்பிக்கைக்காக மற்ற அனைவரின் (புராணம் மற்றும் இதிஹாசங்கள் புகுத்திய) நம்பிக்கையை வீணாக்கக் கூடாது?
Super Rathna mam. Tq so much
Why shud we spew hatred on a person just coz he is famous. If anyone thinks he is more knowledgeable and can refute Dushyants theories, they shud also post a video refuting the same. IMO, an ambassador of Sanatana dharma doesn't deserve such lowly comments.
Even his Guru not accepted his research.
ruclips.net/video/AhPZPqzd8Dk/видео.htmlsi=L_Pl8qZTnOvIOZbC (Sri Sri Satyatma teertha swami , of SriMadwaMadwacharya moola maha samsthana Sri Uttaradhi Math , the one who does pooja to Moola rama , the rama idol which sri rama did pooja during his avatara, with tamil subtitiles ) and ruclips.net/video/YiO9IWULc9U/видео.htmlfeature=shared (Sri Sri Vishwaprassana teertha swami of Sri Pejawar mut , one of Udupi 8 muts and the swamiji who actually did the Sri ramaprathista in ayodhya and current trustee of Sri Rama jenma bhumi trustee Ayodhya) , have given a very logical sastra backed reply for all the points and also more . 2 great Sanyasees of this century has replied to him, and DS knows kannada very well. you can get yourself cleared . He is not an ambassadors of SD, acharyas and acharyas can only be ambassadors of SD no one else. Sri uttaradhi math swamiji has formed a special research team of well learned pundits and engineers and have collected information from the team . A Madwa pundit is ready to give clarity in this matter and translate both the swamijees thoughts on the topic. Worst case scenario im personally ready to give clarity in this matter
@@k.dineshkannana.kesavarama7749 that’s from RN’s channel. He has an agenda he could have edited the vaudio as well
Utter waste interview with this person, Rangarajan Narasimhan interviewed with many scholars and no one agree this yuga calculation and strongly believe Ramayana period is different and cannot compare with Kali Yuga. These ppl trying to demote Hinduism and try to bring near to BC/AD period. Pls avoid this
@@JRRajavarman
All the scholars RN has interviewed were not absolutely categorical.
They more or less parroted that this was what poorvacharyas said.
Perhaps they might be reluctant to enter into argument with RN fearing he will defame them also. See what happened to the Jeer of Sriperumpudur and other two.
They did not want to escalate controversy.
@@raghunathansrinivasaraghav6455Mr Do you agree that the jeeyar done is correct.your problem is not this, why it was disposed to public.Mr Rangarajan Narasimhan is a straightforward person and he never afraid of anybody and he is a God fear man and he is quoting all through Sasthram and samprathayam.
@@srinivasanchellapillais418
You are under a myth. What wrong did the jeyar do ?
It is normal practice for any
Madaathipathi, aadheenam, aacharyaas to visit the homes of people when invited. In fact, we had invited the 44th Jeeyar of Ahobila Mutt to grace and bless us on the occasion of my sister's gruhapravesam. He did come and blessed us. My brother invited the Sri Villiputhur Jeeyar for his son's marriage and the Jeeyar turned up to bless the couple.
If RN wanted to expose the DMK first family, he should have taken Udhayanidhi head on for his abusive comments on Sansthana Dharma by filing case in High Court. Instead, he made the Jeeyars pawns in his
Play. First of all, he should not have dragged them in this. Secondly, he should have got prior express consent from the Sri Perumpudur Jeer about his intention to record the conversation. Again he should have obtained the permission from the jeer for posting it Social Media. Did RN played the audio clip to the Jeer and informed him about putting it in public platform. This is gross betrayal and breach of trust.
Thirdly, his interview itself was in bad taste. Asking the Jeer uncomfortable questions that whether he ate anything in UN's house is outrageous and atrocious. Is he not aware that the Sanyasins follow strict food habits ? Where is the need for that question ,?
His another comment that
" முழுக்க நனைந்தபின்
முக்காடு எதற்கு"."சம்பாவனை கொடுத்தார்களா". It is totally inappropriate . I am shuddered to think of consequences that may befall the Jeer/s. If the case is argued In court and Jeer refutes to the conversation, RN will ask for forensic audit of the tape. If the tape turns out to be true, Jeer will be accused of lying in the court. This may lead to unpleasant consequences. The Sriperumbudur Mutt will remove the jeer from his post and will be expelled. His life after expulsion will be horrible.
This also RN knows. Is this not Acharya Droham? I wish his ( RN) followers ponder over and desist from supporting RN in future.
@@raghunathansrinivasaraghav6455 ruclips.net/video/AhPZPqzd8Dk/видео.htmlsi=L_Pl8qZTnOvIOZbC (Sri Sri Satyatma teertha swami , of SriMadwaMadwacharya moola maha samsthana Sri Uttaradhi Math , the one who does pooja to Moola rama , the rama idol which sri rama did pooja during his avatara, with tamil subtitiles ) and ruclips.net/video/YiO9IWULc9U/видео.htmlfeature=shared (Sri Sri Vishwaprassana teertha swami of Sri Pejawar mut , one of Udupi 8 muts and the swamiji who actually did the Sri ramaprathista in ayodhya and current trustee of Sri Rama jenma bhumi trustee Ayodhya) , have given a very logical sastra backed reply for all the points and also more .Sri uttaradhi math swamiji has formed a special research team of well learned pundits and engineers and have collected information from the team . A Madwa pundit is ready to give clarity in this matter and translate both the swamijees thoughts on the topic. Worst case scenario im personally ready to give clarity in this matter. Pls do contact me personally regarding this matter, your audience who are very good bakthimans in general needs to hear the thoughts of 2 great peetas. My phone number 7904649432 . pls do whatsapp
Ivar enna rishiya?
விஞ்ஞான பூர்வமாக என் கேள்வி. (இது மடத்தனமான கேள்வி என்றும் நினைக்கலாம்).
சுமார் 80 ஆண்டுகளுக்கு முன் ஆஙகிலேயன் இருந்த காலத்தில், நம் சராசரி வயது 30 வருஷம். இன்றைக்கு அதே சராசரி வயது 60 முதல் 80 வரை. இது எப்டி சாத்தியம்? இதுபோன்ற அந்த யுகங்களில் ஆயுள் நீண்டு இருந்திருக்கலாம். அல்லவா???.
ஆயுள் என்பது நம் வாழ்க்கை முறையினால் நிர்ணயிக்கப் படலாம்.அடுத்து கணக்கு வித்தியாசம் படலாம். நாமெல்லாம் இப்போ metric arithmetical தானே பயன் படுத்துகிறார். உண்மையான வேதத்தில் உள்ள கணித சாஸ்த்திரம் உஸ்பெகிஸ்தான், சரியாக இருக்குமோ???.
அறிஞர்களின் பார்வைக்கு விடுகிறேன்.
Worst question is the starting one - how to live and hiw not to live - and saying that Ramayanam is for former and Mahabharata for later.
As if a summary. Check if that's true. Is Ravan, Surpanaka, Vali, what are these examples in Ramayanam then?!
And in Mahabharata what is the life of Pandavas - and many more - how to live life.
It's called confirmation biases because of some summary provided by some fellow as a selling.😢. Wish people realise before it's too late
And the answer is correct 💯 by DS
Dushyantsridhar is very knowlegeable🎉🎉🎉
Kinly look at dushyanth's Sri Suktam youtube video and the opening image. Isn't it nasty to portray Mahalakshmi the 🙏 mother of all mothers that way?
I told him many times but he seems to be incorrigible.
Would he portray his mother, sister or wife like that?
Nasty fellow
Can you please give me the link to the video?
@thesolitaryreaper332 ruclips.net/video/_jKbIaJx2x4/видео.htmlsi=XDwsr1iCH1JgqPNc
@14:10+ the story of marriage before puberty is all humbug, even though that is true, even before 50 years or 100 yrs in my own family i know what was practised - the girl was not sent to husband house rather retained in her mother's house. Read Shri Sharadha Devi life, when she went to join Shri Ramakrishna Paramhansa
Unwanted research. If 11000 years can't be accepted how u accept chadur dandam kajam divyam. 4 dantha elephants . What is the age of 4 danta elephant as per accepted theories. We can ask so many questions in various other aspects to disprove his findings.
He is accepting everything in Ramayanam except Rama's age, I think. What is his motivation has to be discussed.
@@k.dineshkannana.kesavarama7749no he isn’t . There are
No just him, many acharyas don’t accept 11000 yrs as exact arithmetic. It’s allegorical. Uttarakanda has more controversies
@@User01029 ruclips.net/video/AhPZPqzd8Dk/видео.htmlsi=L_Pl8qZTnOvIOZbC ruclips.net/video/YiO9IWULc9U/видео.htmlfeature=shared all that is done and dusted by these two
Why not do research? What's so wrong ?
Please stop this contraversy and keep your popularity.not requd at this juncture
🙏🙏🙏🙏
ruclips.net/video/piJuU4hUrXU/видео.htmlsi=AdqMsg8KDAA1C618
உருட்டுங்க
உருட்டுங்ங
நல்லா உருட்டுங்க
ஸ்ரீ ராமர் வபது பற்றிய இவரது வாதங்கள் ஏற்புடையதாக இல்லை..
தேவையற்ற குழப்பங்களை இந்துக்களிடையே உண்டாக்கும்.
இந்த வீடியோவை நீக்குதல் நலம்.
Are you saying that there should not be any discussion over the matter? You may not agree with their thoughts and opinions, but it does not mean they cannot have one.
@@menagamaniyan8808 don't you understand now the age of Sri ramar and whether he ate veg/non veg is the only thing being discussed?Is it the main core thing which vyasa maharishi wanted people to learn from Sri Ramayanam? Discuss??...we should not promote/ do discussions on topic which creates confusion and which doesn't give the moral/value.
@@rajinarayanan4742 there are a number of videos on the dharma Lord Rama stood for. And, they have attracted thousands of views, as well. If the public is interested in knowing if Rama ate meat or not, we do have scholars to present that issue as well. One cannot try and impose censorship on what to discuss and what not to. Fortunately, we do not live in China or Russia. Sanathan Dharma will continue to thrive in this land. This is the Dharma bhoomi.
🙏🙏🙏🙏
@@menagamaniyan8808So you, the intellectuals want to create confusions amongst Hindus and drive them to discuss Sri Rama's Age issue instead of discussing His Great characters.?
You want to create some space for others (atheists & other religious ppl) to make fun of our Sanathan Dharma.?
*'MunnOr sonna VArthai thappAmey'*
is our Sri Vaishnava's main principles.
So you the Intellectuals should spend your valuable time to make our Dharma to reach more and more general Hindus especially in lower levels, instead of researching / preaching unwanted stuff like this.
Rajeshkumar Narayanan