Billy Go’s Beginner Korean Course | #65: Only 밖에
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 17 сен 2024
- In this lesson you’ll learn a more natural way to say “only” with nouns - the form 밖에. You’ll also learn how 밖에 is different than the particle 만, as well as when to use 만 instead of 밖에.
Want a textbook to start learning Korean? Check out my book, "Korean Made Simple" on Amazon: amzn.to/2bDBi6h (affiliate)
Here’s the full playlist for this course: • Beginner Korean Course
Please consider supporting me on Patreon: / gobillykorean
"GO! Billy Korean" merch is out now! teespring.com/...
Learn Korean with GoBillyKorean! Subscribe for weekly videos!
Every time a new lesson comes out, it's like "WOW! That adds a whole new way to say things in Korean." Nice!
Wow! I've been seeing this a lot lately, I was so confused hearing or reading a sentence and thinking "outside" why?? Anyway, this was so helpful and quick/easy to understand. Thanks! :)
Billy's lesson to learn korean are always the best!!
I think about only
positive
Only = 뿐 , 만 ,오직
nagative
Only = 밖에 (within or without)
밖에 understand this way, 'Apart from this, I don't eat nothing else' get this in your head and you will better understand how to use it and sound natural.
Thank you, Billy. I truly appreciate your lessons. They are very helpful. : )
In Italian we have a similar expression "Non mangio altro che verdure" (literally "I don't eat other than vegetables"), but we use it less often than the other positive form.
I've only ever heard and used 만 thank you for another option
Hi I have a question regarding one of the examples:
In example 5 before it is changed you attached (atleast in my eyes) the subject marker 가 to both 모자 and the counter 게. Can you explain why it feels unnatural to put the emphasis on both the hats and the counter? When I looked around a little bit about counter and particles people wrote that there can be big differences depending on where the particle is attached but I did not find someone using it two times.
As this is my first time commenting:
선생님 감사합니다!
First, are you watching this series in order from the beginning? There are previous lessons which cover how this sort of thing works - such as a previous lesson about the Subject Marker separately, as well as a lesson all about using counters and using the Subject Marker with those as well. I recommend watching this series in order, as everything is taught one thing at a time.
@@GoBillyKorean Thank you very much for your response. I went back to check if I miss remembered something in my run until now and looked again at the three counting videos 61-63. In the end of video 63 you make an remark about it beeing fine to put the markers behind the noun or the counter. So I guess it is also fine to attach the marker to both?:
모자가 두 개가
@@GoBillyKorean now I'm curious too. I've so far never seen a subject marker placed on the noun and the counter at the same time.
@@knightshade1463 I cover this question in this series a few episodes before this one, when I teach about numbers and counters :)
@@GoBillyKorean I've watched it and yet I still haven't seen it anywhere explicitly said that it can be on both at the same time. Just that it can be on either. That's why I got curious with this example sentence.
For whatever situations 밖에 not fit for use, I think 말고 can be used to describe "besides..." or "exclusive of..."
. Anyone agrees?
Those have different meanings. ruclips.net/video/OQlil5mmAHM/видео.html
Sorry, just to understand if i missed something, why does this sentence "빌리 씨는 모자가 두 개가 있어요" have two Subject Markers? One after 모자 and one after 개?
You can use both, or just one if you'd like. You could say 모자가 두 개 있어요 or you could say 모자 두 개가 있어요. Or you could even just say 모자 두 개 있어요 and remove both of them. This is also mentioned in lesson 61. ruclips.net/video/N9WbmLh2uuU/видео.html
@@GoBillyKorean Hello Billy 선생님! I just wanna need some clarification about his comment. So we can also add or drop the subject particle if a person is having a existing thing? According to your reply we can say "모자가 두 개 있어요" or "모자 두 개가 있어요" and "모자 두 개 있어". So in short there's no wrong if you want to use the subject particle on the sentence or not? Correct?
@@irengarrr Yep!
Hi Billy, how would you say 'only' in the sense as 'that shop sells it for only/just 5000 won' or 'I am only/just 18 years old'? I feel like the 밖에 form doesn't quite cover this, is there another form to use for this or will the 밖에 form suffice?
You can use 만, as is taught in a previous lesson of this series :) Or you can use this form 밖에 with 안 되다.
Hey 🙂
Didn't you say i a former lesson, that 명 is only the counter for people? Here you translate it with "only one person" without using 사람 or 분.
I recommend re-watching the lesson on counters :D
@@GoBillyKorean Re-watched. Now I know... Sorry for bothering you.... 😬
The particule 밖에 with a negative verb assume a negative or a positive sense ?
I just can't understand why a sentence with a negative verb shows positive meaning in the transition
What i mean by negative and positive sense is affirmative and negative
It means "negative" as in using 안 or ~지 않다 or a negative verb (this is shown in a previous lesson in this series), not a "bad" meaning.
Why are the negative verbs translated to positive, like 안 + Verb or 없다...?? I have watched all classes in the playlist so far but I don't remember seeing something like this before. Is there a video you suggest?
That's simply due to how English and Korean express things differently. You can simply memorize those as they are :)
@@GoBillyKorean Oh Okay okay Gotta remember it's a new and different language from English ㅋㅋㅋ 감사합니다
"저는 한국 음악밖에 안 들어요." 선생님, I feel called out. That or you just know certain parts of your audience
Once you go 한국 음악, you never go 밖. Excuse the pun 😂🙃
@@nixhtha good one😂😂😂
@@nixhtha I love that! 😂
For the practice section would it be okay if for 3) I instead wrote the following?: 저는 고양익밖에 안 키우고 싶어요. Basically using 안 instead of 지 않다.
And at the end when you say 밖에 can’t be used with 아니다 nor with commands and suggestions. Just use 만 instead for those situations correct?
Thank you for any help.
You can use either 안 or the ~지 않다 form to make sentences negative.
Maybe in French it would be “à part”, 저는 채소밖에 안 먹어요 je ne mange rien à part les légumes
Hi Billy.... just to clarify, it seems from your sentence examples that the Topic, Subject and Object Markers are not used after 밖에. Is that correct? Also, in the example 저는 고양이밖에 키우고 싶지 않아요, can 안 be used instead of ...지 않다 ie, 저는 고양이밖에 안 키우고 싶어요 ?
Yes, 안 and ~지 않다 can both be negative. Just keep in mind that 안 doesn't attach to every verb and you're fine :)
@@GoBillyKorean And the markers after 밖에?
@@kathy4259 You wouldn't add a marker after a particle like that, so no.
@@GoBillyKorean Thank you for clarifying those points :) I am learning so much more from your lessons :)
Hi Billy. Can markers be used along with 밖에 ?
Can you give me an example of a sentence you mean?
@@GoBillyKorean in your video relating to particle 만 I remember u saying that markers should be used after 만. Ex : 만을, 만은
Now in the sentence I only eat Kimchi, is it right to say 저는 김치밖에을 안 먹어요 ?
@@shwetham0693 That marker will not be used after 밖에 :)
@@GoBillyKorean thank you Billy for the reply 😊✨
How to use 밖에 in a negative sentence? For example: "Only one person didn't do it"
That sort of sentence sounds awkward in English and in Korean. You'd probably want to switch it to say something else so it'll be easier for everyone to understand what it is you mean. Double negatives can quickly get confusing. For example, instead of saying "Only one person didn't do it," it'd be better to just say "One person (here) didn't do it" or "Except one person, everyone did it," or "Almost everyone did it," or other ways.
@@GoBillyKorean Aww in french that kind of sentences are common, that's why I got confused ^^ 감사합니다 !
しか ない
저는 빌리 씨 비디오밖에 안 봐요....
이거 맞죠..???
majayo
its like saying 'I dont know anyone outside Billy.' literally
Sir can we easily translate the sentence as I don’t eat anything outside of vegetables, and this itself gives negative vibes....