NEJM: “At one time, the worst offense one encountered was someone prescribing a few herbs to a desperate patient who'd exhausted all other means of treatment. The usual thinking was, “At this stage, it can't do any harm.” But insidiously and alarmingly, “alternative medicine” has crept from offering last-ditch treatments to making diagnoses. As the cancer armamentarium has expanded with targeted therapies, unscrupulous practitioners of alternative therapy have devised competing offers that sound at least as impressive to the average patient, who is often marginally health-literate and eager to embrace the promise of a cure without toxicity. But the radical, completely unregulated, and often dangerous options on offer can and do cause harm. Just in the past year, my patients have discussed intravenous selenium, vitamin C, high-dose apricot kernel, ozone treatment, and microwave therapy as cures for their cancer. Most recently, a patient with bleeding from an occult cancer wasted 3 months seeking gel treatment after being advised that his iron-deficiency anemia was the result of a fungal invasion of his red cells.”
@@kennethmoore3783 More like 19th century garbage. How'd the human genome project work out for you? Genes and pills are old age thinking and are effectively your knowledge base. Whether you train 1 year or 10 years. I'll listen to the cream of the crop like Robert Navaiux, and even Harvard trained professionals like Christopher Palmer before I listen to keyboard warriors who are run of the mill GP's at best.
I'd give 20 years off my life to be examined by this guy.
I wish meRT Therapy was covered by insurance. 💙💔 we could afford one, but it helped her.
“Family physician “ with 1 year training (internship). Doximity lists no training in neurology or neuroscience. Cleveland Clinic? What’s happening?
NEJM: “At one time, the worst offense one encountered was someone prescribing a few herbs to a desperate patient who'd exhausted all other means of treatment. The usual thinking was, “At this stage, it can't do any harm.” But insidiously and alarmingly, “alternative medicine” has crept from offering last-ditch treatments to making diagnoses. As the cancer armamentarium has expanded with targeted therapies, unscrupulous practitioners of alternative therapy have devised competing offers that sound at least as impressive to the average patient, who is often marginally health-literate and eager to embrace the promise of a cure without toxicity. But the radical, completely unregulated, and often dangerous options on offer can and do cause harm.
Just in the past year, my patients have discussed intravenous selenium, vitamin C, high-dose apricot kernel, ozone treatment, and microwave therapy as cures for their cancer. Most recently, a patient with bleeding from an occult cancer wasted 3 months seeking gel treatment after being advised that his iron-deficiency anemia was the result of a fungal invasion of his red cells.”
So what are you offering?
@@ngufanikojo6430
Evidence based medicine
pseudoscience
"right kind of treatment"
based on what studies?
check out Cochran database
don't be so gullible
@@kennethmoore3783where have l heard that line before??
@@kennethmoore3783 More like 19th century garbage. How'd the human genome project work out for you? Genes and pills are old age thinking and are effectively your knowledge base. Whether you train 1 year or 10 years. I'll listen to the cream of the crop like Robert Navaiux, and even Harvard trained professionals like Christopher Palmer before I listen to keyboard warriors who are run of the mill GP's at best.