Well he that have an ear let him hear learning some things and a lot to learn with this Bantu history and so much more but willing to learn thanks bro.Duane.
@@brianlam1663 It's also proof that apartheid was not racist and oppressive. Blacks were not oppressed. If blacks were oppressed blacks would not have been given their own independent homelands.
@@brianlam1663Huh. 😮I lived through it? What do you want to know? You have the internet. It's only a click away. KD & Mandela were cousins. KD was Crown Prince as Mandela's was stripped off his royal titles by the Brits. KD & Nelson ran away to Alexandra in 1942 if I remember correctly. KD could not understand why Nelson took the stance he did so they split.
This needs to be part of history. I thought they were just towns in South Africa, never knew they were independent states. How come they look better run than what the ANC is doing?
They weren't really. Transkei at the time was merely "autonomous" even the ones that were later granted independence were unrecognized. The Bantustans were generally disconnected with isolated towns separated by South African controlled territory. The places look well run because this is compiled from propaganda footage. You could selectively film the Soviet Union, Nazi Germany or any other horrific regime to make it look "well run." There is a reason people rejected Apartheid.
They were set up for a failure but KD fought a brought development one better the ANC had a achieved in democracy Umthatha and Butterworth were better in Matanzimas time than now
Matanzima could not be independent of south Africa. When the anc took over they invaded transkei and made it part of eastern cape again. The people from there are still like foreigners. When I went there in 2018,, it still felt like a foreign state. The people behave differently than south Africans
People can insult K. D. Mathanzima but he was far smarter the black political leadership I'm seeing in a liberated South Africa. Even his first Cabinet was comprise of highly educated people than what I'm seeing today wherein even someone with no formal education can be a Head of State, shortsightedness at its own worst!
😆Mister Hendrik Frensch Verwoerd explain the transkei project 🙏0:32. 3:46😅 the black Chief is only Reading from a paper 😅but i guess he does not understand what he is Talking about because when Mandela came out of jail in around 1990,those Chiefs complain that the transkei project was not good,sorry my bad english i speak german.
This matanzima was a lawyer. He took over in 1962 but was relying on South Africa. In 1981 I went through the Transkei a lot ... We used to go to the casino.
@@richarderasmus4989He was a the Tembu Crown Prince, cousin & best friend to Mandela. This event saw their rift as Mandela was already in Robben Island.
@@katlegomoatshe1312 It was only a minority of blacks that were brainwashed by liberal leftist Communist propaganda that were against apartheid and seperate development. Most blacks supported apartheid and seperate development.
The masses were brainwashed by communist propaganda...it wasn't about rejection etc, they were forced to comply or face the consequences..I've done my research...imagine transkei now 30 years later as an independent homeland...they woulda been thriving beyond comprehension but now they have been subjected to communist anc terrorism ...ie, cultural and social economic sabotage
They should have done that for all the tribes in SA. The Afrikaaner gave homelands and countries to black tribes in South Africa when they were in control. Will they now do the same for the Afrikaaner?
To answer your question: no they would not. However, the thing you must remember is that the quality of the homelands’ standard of living, available resources and funding were laughably worse than that given to the whites. Each African tribe had their own specially dedicated land, yes. But we must not overlook the fact that the land given to these tribes were far from “ideal.” The thought process basically went like this: • Land A - Has lots of gold and natural resources, has fertile ground, has a lot of space, and also has existing industry and infrastructure from prior colonial rule. • Land B - Has no gold or quality natural resources, has almost no fertile ground, basically has to make due with squeezing 50 families in a small area where land A’s people would have 5 families, and lastly does not have much to work with in terms of existing industry or infrastructure. Whites (and some coloured folks who could pass for being white) got Land A. Whereas blacks, darker coloureds, Indians and Chinese people were all forced (i.e. against their will) to get Land B. Yes, the government at the time knew how to build a country, develop its economic and industrial standards, advance its groundbreaking international influence, preserve and develop art, etc. However, you cannot convince me that racist laws will ever be right. It’s not right now, and it wasn’t right then. Am I saying that today’s government is functional, knowledgeable and honest? NO! 😂 but what I am saying is that Apartheid and the National Party was wrong. We must acknowledge the shortcomings of every system and objectively look at what works and what doesn’t work. Then we must treat every system/philosophy/belief with the same equal amount of skepticism and fairness as we do with others. With that in mind, Apartheid’s disadvantages far outweigh the unethical advantages. The answer to this dilemma, however, is not to do what the current government does (or at least what it wants to do). Breaking everything down just to start all over again is just gonna end up even worse than than the state of the country at the beginning of Apartheid. Instead of breaking down, we must be building up. Let’s take our current schools, for example: Don’t take Afrikaans out of the educational system, rather give everyone the opportunity to get proper quality schooling in their own language. Don’t try and degrade everything related to Afrikaans culture/history/language just because the Apartheid government spoke it - no. Rather put in the effort and money and give the proper resources and opportunities to all schools. (This is the right course of action, but the current South African government won’t take it because almost everyone is corrupt and has a finger in the pie - so the money would rather go to a minister’s 3 Million Rand monthly salary than it would go to a school where all the kids basically starve and write with sticks in the mud). If a language does not have any academic standard yet, then START developing it. If there is no academic literature in the language, then in reality there is no excuse in that sense. We DO have intelligent and qualified people from every official language that can make this happen - yet it’s still not happening. Relying on English as a crutch for the academic underdevelopment of another language is not the way forward. Hopefully I am making sense to you?
@@WiseLittleOwl Hi Reinhard. Thank you for your detailed response. It does make a lot of sense. Hope we can find s workable solution for SA. I love the country but hate its politics.
What we would like to know is the role played by the Soros backed Provecateurs the Black Sash movement in the vilification/ slander that continualky undernined the Afrikaner Government for 40 years amongst the indigenous peoples of South Africa.
The "Afrikaner government" managed to undermine itself by engaging in severe corruption and severe violation of International Law and basic human rights.
I wish these Bantustans worked. Life would've been so more different than it is now. But the Afrikaners were too nationalistic and bigoted. This could've been workable if liberals had ran South Africa.
Explain how he was a sellout ? Look at the condition of the transkei today? Unless you mean the anc is a sellout organisation to soviet Communism the we can start talking...proof is in the pudding...transkei would have been thriving today
People like you must grow up and stop swallowing the Anc's marxist propaganda and be independent thinkers for once. Ask any elderly black person whos not political affiliated which governance does she or he prefers you'll be surprised.
Mathanzima regurgitating a script that he was given to say.
Thanks for sharing
Well he that have an ear let him hear learning some things and a lot to learn with this Bantu history and so much more but willing to learn thanks bro.Duane.
I completely agree! We need to know more about this Bantu independence. It is buried in history and we know very little about it!!
@@brianlam1663 It's also proof that apartheid was not racist and oppressive. Blacks were not oppressed. If blacks were oppressed blacks would not have been given their own independent homelands.
@@brianlam1663Huh. 😮I lived through it? What do you want to know? You have the internet. It's only a click away. KD & Mandela were cousins. KD was Crown Prince as Mandela's was stripped off his royal titles by the Brits. KD & Nelson ran away to Alexandra in 1942 if I remember correctly. KD could not understand why Nelson took the stance he did so they split.
Proper nurse with overwhelming compassion for huma kind
I remember this President when I was 2 years old.
2 years?😂..
When was that Sir??? 7/6/2024
Verwoerd he was president until 1966
2 years old and you still have recollection?😂😂
He was prime minister and got assassinated for comin up and driving apartheid
This needs to be part of history. I thought they were just towns in South Africa, never knew they were independent states. How come they look better run than what the ANC is doing?
They weren't really. Transkei at the time was merely "autonomous" even the ones that were later granted independence were unrecognized. The Bantustans were generally disconnected with isolated towns separated by South African controlled territory. The places look well run because this is compiled from propaganda footage. You could selectively film the Soviet Union, Nazi Germany or any other horrific regime to make it look "well run." There is a reason people rejected Apartheid.
@arthurfretheim7782 Outside of aggressive territorial ambitions, SDP Germany was very well run. Maybe you intended to say Weimar Germany?
"better run" they were glorified ghettoes, please don't start with the apartheid apologia
Because they were GRANTED a constitution based on PRINCIPLES OF WESTERN DEMOCRACIES
Cause the ANCancer is useless. Mxm
They were set up for a failure but KD fought a brought development one better the ANC had a achieved in democracy Umthatha and Butterworth were better in Matanzimas time than now
So what happened to the Bantu state?
Did you find out yet?
It was a Hell on Earth.
Eastern Cape mate Ciskei & Transkei Land of the Tembu/Xhosa. The last independent Bantu nation to fall in 1891/2 to the Cape Colony.
The ANC ruined it
Matanzima could not be independent of south Africa. When the anc took over they invaded transkei and made it part of eastern cape again. The people from there are still like foreigners. When I went there in 2018,, it still felt like a foreign state. The people behave differently than south Africans
Akulanjwa kelonto 😢kuloo Transkei yabo yayihlutha abathile
Azba ilamba ukogqitha bani na xa ngathi kulanjwa konke nje qha it depends on how much coverage do others get.
I see the horses riding in York Road from the direction of "Stadium" riding down passing the building opposite Std Bank...and Town Hall...7/6/2024
People can insult K. D. Mathanzima but he was far smarter the black political leadership I'm seeing in a liberated South Africa. Even his first Cabinet was comprise of highly educated people than what I'm seeing today wherein even someone with no formal education can be a Head of State, shortsightedness at its own worst!
I went there in 1985, still have the visa paper
We knew it... but what really happened?...Politics!!!
Nostalgic. 😍
😆Mister Hendrik Frensch Verwoerd explain the transkei project 🙏0:32. 3:46😅 the black Chief is only Reading from a paper 😅but i guess he does not understand what he is Talking about because when Mandela came out of jail in around 1990,those Chiefs complain that the transkei project was not good,sorry my bad english i speak german.
This matanzima was a lawyer. He took over in 1962 but was relying on South Africa. In 1981 I went through the Transkei a lot ... We used to go to the casino.
@@richarderasmus4989He was a the Tembu Crown Prince, cousin & best friend to Mandela. This event saw their rift as Mandela was already in Robben Island.
The homelands were successful and did well.
Yeah, that's why people fought against apartheid. Makes sense.
@@katlegomoatshe1312 It was only a minority of blacks that were brainwashed by liberal leftist Communist propaganda that were against apartheid and seperate development. Most blacks supported apartheid and seperate development.
Mxm
True cause you could access our parents pensions through fake governments. Disguising as hard workers. La masela!
The masses were brainwashed by communist propaganda...it wasn't about rejection etc, they were forced to comply or face the consequences..I've done my research...imagine transkei now 30 years later as an independent homeland...they woulda been thriving beyond comprehension but now they have been subjected to communist anc terrorism ...ie, cultural and social economic sabotage
They should have done that for all the tribes in SA. The Afrikaaner gave homelands and countries to black tribes in South Africa when they were in control. Will they now do the same for the Afrikaaner?
They did do it for all the tribes. Each tribe was given their own homeland.
To answer your question: no they would not.
However, the thing you must remember is that the quality of the homelands’ standard of living, available resources and funding were laughably worse than that given to the whites.
Each African tribe had their own specially dedicated land, yes. But we must not overlook the fact that the land given to these tribes were far from “ideal.”
The thought process basically went like this:
• Land A - Has lots of gold and natural resources, has fertile ground, has a lot of space, and also has existing industry and infrastructure from prior colonial rule.
• Land B - Has no gold or quality natural resources, has almost no fertile ground, basically has to make due with squeezing 50 families in a small area where land A’s people would have 5 families, and lastly does not have much to work with in terms of existing industry or infrastructure.
Whites (and some coloured folks who could pass for being white) got Land A. Whereas blacks, darker coloureds, Indians and Chinese people were all forced (i.e. against their will) to get Land B.
Yes, the government at the time knew how to build a country, develop its economic and industrial standards, advance its groundbreaking international influence, preserve and develop art, etc.
However, you cannot convince me that racist laws will ever be right. It’s not right now, and it wasn’t right then.
Am I saying that today’s government is functional, knowledgeable and honest?
NO! 😂 but what I am saying is that Apartheid and the National Party was wrong.
We must acknowledge the shortcomings of every system and objectively look at what works and what doesn’t work. Then we must treat every system/philosophy/belief with the same equal amount of skepticism and fairness as we do with others.
With that in mind, Apartheid’s disadvantages far outweigh the unethical advantages.
The answer to this dilemma, however, is not to do what the current government does (or at least what it wants to do). Breaking everything down just to start all over again is just gonna end up even worse than than the state of the country at the beginning of Apartheid. Instead of breaking down, we must be building up.
Let’s take our current schools, for example: Don’t take Afrikaans out of the educational system, rather give everyone the opportunity to get proper quality schooling in their own language. Don’t try and degrade everything related to Afrikaans culture/history/language just because the Apartheid government spoke it - no. Rather put in the effort and money and give the proper resources and opportunities to all schools. (This is the right course of action, but the current South African government won’t take it because almost everyone is corrupt and has a finger in the pie - so the money would rather go to a minister’s 3 Million Rand monthly salary than it would go to a school where all the kids basically starve and write with sticks in the mud).
If a language does not have any academic standard yet, then START developing it. If there is no academic literature in the language, then in reality there is no excuse in that sense. We DO have intelligent and qualified people from every official language that can make this happen - yet it’s still not happening. Relying on English as a crutch for the academic underdevelopment of another language is not the way forward.
Hopefully I am making sense to you?
@@WiseLittleOwl Hi Reinhard. Thank you for your detailed response. It does make a lot of sense. Hope we can find s workable solution for SA. I love the country but hate its politics.
Yes, go live in the Kalahari Desert.
Aah! Daliwonga
This is obviously propaganda but I wonder what Trasnkei would have been like if apartheid didn't end.
AAAAhhhhh Daliwooongaaaa....7/6/2024
What we would like to know is the role played by the Soros backed Provecateurs the Black Sash movement in the vilification/ slander that continualky undernined the Afrikaner Government for 40 years amongst the indigenous peoples of South Africa.
Black Sash funded by Solos
The "Afrikaner government" managed to undermine itself by engaging in severe corruption and severe violation of International Law and basic human rights.
I wish these Bantustans worked.
Life would've been so more different than it is now.
But the Afrikaners were too nationalistic and bigoted.
This could've been workable if liberals had ran South Africa.
Verwoerd had sincerely good intentions, why didn't the Transkei succeed?
ANC
@@mfesanekunju6051 nawhaw
He was full of sh**
You good person, need to read a book.
@@Keegodd what book?
Propaganda
Dr H.F. Verwoed..31/7/2022
A fool he was.
@@Lettersfromhome18 a fool you are
sellout
Explain how he was a sellout ? Look at the condition of the transkei today? Unless you mean the anc is a sellout organisation to soviet Communism the we can start talking...proof is in the pudding...transkei would have been thriving today
People like you must grow up and stop swallowing the Anc's marxist propaganda and be independent thinkers for once.
Ask any elderly black person whos not political affiliated which governance does she or he prefers you'll be surprised.