I genuinely don't understand why someone would think you can't kick up dust in a vacuum. How would you even come up with such a stupid idea and not immediately realize it's stupid?
I genuinely don't understand your confusion and need to ask your question. It's simply a question of complete ignorance of Physics and therefore a lack of understanding of what a vacuum is and how objects react in one. Ignorance doesn't always equate with stupidity 😉
@@vladpadowicz5946 in some cases ignorance and stupidity is the same thing. Idk if thats the case here but to the ppl who know science, it might sound like that
@vibovitold unfortunately they did. The Moon dust was thrown up onto their suits while walking around (as you can see in the video). It tended to cling to the surface of the suit, not least because it's very easy to build up an electrostatic charge between the dust and suit on the moon surface. So, they ended up bringing dust into the lunar lander, which they would then breathe in eventually, leading to lung irritation for example.
It’s like the guy who thought he proved the earth was flat by taking a level on an airplane and showing that the bubble is still between the two lines.
@@eetoved1758 I was about to point out that it does. He barely kicks it, and look how far it flies. The *lower* gravity really makes it go some distance
We never went to the Moon because we have never been past the Van Allen Radiation Belt. That is the only 'conspiracy theory' that should be entertained.
I remember when I was a kid watching the images from the moon as soon as they were available to the News. Somethin that caught my eye even as a kid, is that in the absence of atmosphere, the dust fell back to the ground just as fast as the pebbles. I guess the average kid in the 60s was smarter than the average adult conspiracy theorist today.
Indeed. And remember when people said - if only those who say idiotic things had access to more information, they wouldn’t be so silly. Well, that turned out to be nonsense.
@@cwstewartjr1973 how long did it take to land in the original video? and how long did it take to land here on earth? you tell us then, since you seem to know more. Why question instead of telling
Well in reality the video It is not quite correct, you see when you work with air conditioner, a mini split and you want a vacuum free of humidity. You have to keep a vacuum at least for half of hour, forty minutes, you have to use a digital vacuometer and in the video the guy put in his "vacuum chamber" (you don't really know if it's sealed) and turned the vacuum just for a seconds...... it's not that easy to clean the system from humidity, so the result is not conclusive
Dust flies also because of lack of air on the moon. If you kick a pebble on Earth, it can fly a few meters. If you kick dust, it won't fly far because air will stop it. On the Moon, if you kick dust, it flies exactly as far as if you kicked a pebble.
@@theunknown9437 Hard to take you seriously, when you lack the ability to spell a common word. It is better to be pissed off, than to be pissed on. Checkmate.
It also doesn't have any water eroding away the materials rubbing them up against each other taking away their sharpness so they also lock together and that's why the footprint is so crisp
wait... Flat Earth supports Fake Moon-landing because rockets cant orbit a fucking disk Which makes Globe Earth better because Moon-landings are definitely real
@@daveleekatzthis makes you angry. I sense you’re upset. Maybe you could reflect on why this bothers you and elicited a rude response from you? Also he never said or even implied they were not both possible, in fact he said they were both possible when he said “also”.
@@johncomments2730 its completely fd up to claim it's a lie when all those men and now Women All put there lives on the line many times. Ya damn right I'm angry. It's very telling that you're not angry 🤡
@@johncomments2730 you're damn right it upsets me. Those men risked their lives to further our scientific knowledge. They could have given their lives at any point in those missions. It's very telling that you don't recognize this.
Made in a Hollywood basement, the year was 1969 what number of evil is in that? It’s so obvious that was his big move to lead you guys away from the sacred book, ITS FAKE THATS WHY WE CANT GO BACK AND EVERY SINGLE ROCKET DOSENT LEAVE THE ATMOSPHERE
And you can't even fix these people because everything you tell them is "a lie" and, even though they can't prove anything themselves, they want tou to prove what's already being proven over the internet in 10 seconds.
It's remarkable how little people know about. I heard adults arguing about how much faster could a helicopter lift off the Moon because it's smaller. Boy, that was fun explaining. I don't think they ever understood me about no air.
Even if there was zero gravity (which I know there is gravity on the moon), the kinetic energy of the kick would be enough to send shit into space and go until stopped
It's almost like when there's no air is even easier for things to move and also have nothing to make particles settle You can press things into flour/cornstarch and have it keep the shape too
I had a science teacher in the 80s who denied the moon landing. His big objection was that there were no dust clouds when the lunar module landed and took off.
I don't understand, what do they think would happen to the dust because there's no air? Do they think it would stay stuck to the moon ground? Wouldn't that just be caused by the type of surface and nothing to do with if there is air or not?
Hahahaha “Remind me to dust my camera too, will ya?” Immediately after, “Don’t forget to dust your camera…” I love how they can still joke around in situations as serious as this.
You can find on YT longer videos of them doing funny stuff. Playing with a ball, throwing tools, jumping up and down(which almost caused him to rip his suit.... and die)
the dust getting kicked up doesn't have to do with gravity, but with transfer of momentum. if you knock a thing against a thing, it'll still move in low/null gravity. in fact, it'll move more.
The air is not moving all the dust and sand in a storm. They are, literally, bouncing off each other after moved. For every action there is a reaction. It is simply a transfer of energy.
Nevermind the phuckin dust or a vacuum shoe print. How tha phuck can you go from your knees 2 popping straight up, without a phuckin wire? gravity or not, just look @ em, hop along Cassidy
@@The_Old_War_Elephant they can do it every time they want to, but there is not point. And also did you know the budget of NASA was much much more in 1969 than now? Do your research before talking about a topic that you don't know about.
The issue with conspiracy theorists like these is that they don't understand even the basics of physics. A medium isn't needed for something to move, otherwise the universe would be locked in place; and fine powders don't need moisture to stick because friction and intermolecular bonds make it cohesive enough to retain the shape if not disturbed
Like someone pointed out in below comments: In High school physics, simple problems like studying the trajectory and velocity of a projectile, free fall, etc., the questions usually ask you to neglect air resistance. Because taking it into consideration needlessly complicates high school physics. We can automatically assume, projectiles act and behave in vacuum almost identical to how they act on our world.
I like how people who didn’t even take high school physics feel that they are qualified to criticize and theorize about something that directly needs physics to know.
@@ioncekilledamanwithmyshoe To alot of people, things that require studying, replicable results through experiments, and peer reviewed certification are part of a giant conspiracy.
It will actually work more better in vacuum of space because of no air resistance or gravity! , and on different planets gravity will affect differently but most still be better than earth
This@@robertwalker7010 guy is going around this channel's videos and saying everything is fake lol. Seriously stop believing everything you saw on Facebook dude.
I have no idea why people would think dust or sand wouldn't fly after being kicked or disturbed on the surface of the moon. Maybe since there was no video or photographic evidence of a blast crater being made underneath the ship or no dust whatsoever being seen on the landing pads of the lunar lander some people must have just assumed it was impossible for dust to fly. Boy were they wrong! It is strange that the moon surface beneath the lander was completely undisturbed now that we know for a fact dust in a vacuum will fly????
(1) "no dust whatsoever being seen on the landing pads of the lunar lander". Incorrect, see photograph AS16-107-17442. (2) "no ..... evidence of a blast crater"...Just 3000lb of thrust and rocket engine cut some 2m above surface so no such crater should be expected. (3) "surface beneath the lander was completely undisturbed"...Incorrect, dust is observed being disturbed (and commented on by the astronauts) in the 16mm footage taken from inside the LM on every landing. Take care.
Try an experiment where you have a lunar lander break free from the moon’s gravitational pull without sufficient fuel, but somehow manage to dock with an orbiting rocket traveling at 24,000 mph.
“Remind me to dust my camera will ya?” *immediately after * “Don’t forget to dust your camera” That cheeky bastard. Good to see they were having fun out there
Why is no one talking about the god tier dad jokes being told on a multibillion dollar government operation? “Remind me to dust my camera too, will ya?” “Don’t forget to dust your camera”
I believe the only reason for dust to not fly around is to have the gravity of the moon makes them so heavy so they won't fly around. But I also believe that moon's gravity to be around 1/6th only sooo
@@nicholasdriver8253 it's not theoretical, if you take off your helmet in space, you will die due to all of the moisture in your body being sucked out in a few short seconds. But yeah man, guess I'm just wrong for actually learning.
Buzz Aldrin already said it never happened. Then nasa "loses" the tech to go back. You're a muppet. Humans will rot and go extinct on earth. We haven't and never will leave the outermost atmosphere. They go to the ISS practically in street clothes now. Not space. Still in the outer ring of the stratosphere. Van Allen radiation plus the fact that America nukes everything make it impossible to leave.
@@lappansommer546You mean something like how did they survived the van allen belt on their way back and forth or the lost plans about the rocket or the lost original film material, or would the movie sequence be enough about the fake half earth, which was only the half window from the inside of the space dome? And at least i accidently also saw the original footage with their wires on their costumes and their whole film set. Sorry for that, but better to say so before sora will came out soon and the truth is going to die at all 😢
@@lappansommer546 The evidence that we never went to the Moon is overwhelming! You just refuse to see it because you want to be a sheep. We've never been off this Earth. You can't get off this Earth.
Blimey are there still people out there that thinks the Americans never landed on the moon!!!! Amazing!!!! I mean if they faked the landings the Russians would have been all over it!!! And there are photos taken by satellites of the lunar landing sites over the last 20 years!!! Of course they landed on the moon!!!
@@Copelandscampwhy would every single rocket scientist not just in NASA but around the globe lie then??? what about all of the satellites, space stations and rockets? they were all just made up? every single engineer involved, from the companies used to manufacture specific parts, to the physicists and scientists who do all of the calculations and experiments are just LYING to make us THINK we can get off earth?? are you insane? do you even realize how many people, not just engineers directly working for NASA were involved in the AMERICAN space launch alone? not to mention that this applies to EVERY OTHER COUNTRY which has made attempts to put satellites, space stations, and rockets in space. holy shit.
Go back to 1969 and live video feed and recreate that tin foil space craft. We'll you could do that in your kitchen. Don't forget the sparkles when you take off
Fun fact: moon dust is also razor sharp since there’s nothing to erode it. It’s also very electrostatic, or it can cling really easily. There have even been cases of the dust ripping through four layers of Kevlar in an astronauts boot.
@@cappiece3786 yes they did. People who dont believe in the moon landing are the same people who will argue with you over anything. They will continue to deny and move the goal posts to suit their argument and will never give up.
The dust is flying around the same way he’s flying around, under his power. He kicks it up then gravity makes him and the dust fall back down at the same rate.
Incorrect. There is no terrestrial telescope in existence that has the resolution to resolve Apollo objects on the lunar surface. But satellites in lunar orbit from 4 different countries have identified and verified the Apollo landing sites on the lunar surface exactly where the should be. Take care.
Astronauts = Objects likewise Sand particles also = objects If astronauts can movie and jump in no air So does sand particles Astronauts = Sand particles = Can move
@@vintage8818 well I just busted you right there buddy if it's 1/6 of Earth gravity then it would take 1/6 of the fuel that it took to put that rocket into outer space and I didn't see any silos on the moon lander.
Here are the words of Dr. James Van Allen himself: "The outbound and inbound trajectories of the Apollo spacecraft cut through the outer portions of the inner belt and because of their high speed spent only about 15 minutes in traversing the region and less than 2 hours in traversing the much less penetrating radiation in the outer radiation belt. The resulting radiation exposure for the round trip was less than 1% of a fatal dosage - a very minor risk among the far greater other risks of such flights. I made such estimates in the early 1960s and so informed NASA engineers who were planning the Apollo flights. These estimates are still reliable. The recent Fox TV show, which I saw, is an ingenious and entertaining assemblage of nonsense. The claim that radiation exposure during the Apollo missions would have been fatal to the astronauts is only one example of such nonsense." Dr. James A. Van Allen.
Of course he's going to say those words in order to protect the integrity of NASA's lies. We don't know any different to argue against him. However, when NASA airs a program like they did on national television On March 9th, 2015 a NASA spokesperson admitted that they cannot send crafts through the Van Allen Belts. "Straight from a NASA employee's own mouth; "we must solve these challenges before we send people through this region of space." Sounds a bit contradictory, wouldn't you say, Mr. Van Allen?
@@joaquinmenendez2059 Nope, no contradiction at all. You really should watch the full "Orion - Trial by Fire" documentary and make some effort to understand what the engineer (Not a spokesperson) Kelly Smith was saying. and the context of the comments. "My name is Kelly Smith and I work on navigation and guidance for Orion"...It is clear and obvious that everything that he says is in this context and is about the Orion spacecraft. Do better than cherry-picking comments out of context and pretending that they mean other than do. Take care.
@@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth Not cherry picking. Merely sharing an observation that entails some discrepancies. And your reply doesn’t prove anything. All you're doing is demonstrating how dedicated you are playing the role of a pro-NASA advocate. And while doing so you quote textbook after textbook of old arguing points that fail to hold any water. Do you have any thoughts of your own? Or are not creative enough to come up with any proof that Man went to the moon and back in a tin can? Forget about landing on the moon. How about this one. I want you to look at the video released and aired by NASA regarding Venus In Transit, and explain to me how is it that you can see the edge right through venus as it moves across. The edge of the sun is seen through Venus clear as day. Please explain that one to me. Prove your loyalty to NASA with your answer. If you should by some miracle happen to find an answer in your haste rustling through your textbooks or laptop I'll be convinced that you might be a paid shill.
@@joaquinmenendez2059 A lot of waffle and attempted deflection. You attempted to cherry-pick comments out of context and you have been called out. Deal with it. Take care.
It depends on the planet or moon. The moon does technical have an extremely tenuous atmosphere but its pressure is millions of millions of times less than Earths. For all practical purposes the moon can be considered to be in a vacuum. Take care.
There is a trace amount of sodium around the moon which gets pushed off by the solar wind. During the new moon phase it blows towards and past earth and sensitive telescopes detect a slightly streetlight-orange glow.
I like how people who didn’t even take high school physics feel that they are qualified to criticize and theorize about something that directly needs physics to know.
And there is also some idiot that believes that moon is just a big chunk of rocks that supposed to not have dust particles as similar as sand in the Earth 😂. I do make an argument with that person and almost try to beat that person.
Nope...the bigger question is why you seem to think that "there is no gravity" on the moon. Gravity is associated with mass. The moon has mass, therefore the moon has gravity. Gravity on the lunar surface is about 17% of that on earth. Take care.
The dust probably flies further and faster as there's no air resistance, although the smaller particles would've benefitted from being suspended in the air for some time. We see dust fly up and out quickly and drop quickly so it literally does look like dust in a vacuum..
The dust obviously can fly up if kicked on the on the moon, however it will fall much slower [specially fine dust] because of something called gravity which is much less than the earths. This is the same except the video is slowed down...
@@googlesucks100ballsandshaf6hmm.. I'm not sure if this reply is meant for me as it doesn't seem relevant but as you have my attention "something called gravity" doesn't work like that. In a vacuum (moon) e"specially fine dust" will fall at the same speed as larger dust. However, it may appear to land later because it has gone higher than larger debris (transfer of kinetic energy from boot to dust). On Earth fine dust stays in the air because, well because it's suspended in the air. If Earth were a vacuum, yes it would pull stuff down quicker (and not let it fly so high in the first place) vs the moon but it's not going to compare to dust suspended in a gaseous environment
@@Itsgyro possibly but they mentioned 'especially fine dust' falling slower due to 'something called gravity'. Seemed like they were giving a snarky lesson on gravity but messed it up lol
@@mixerfistit5522 it’s not a vacuum tho it’s an atmosphere and the moon has an atmosphere of itself just somewhat weak so it won’t have as much of an effect against it as a vacuum does
@@rhozq Gravity (from Latin gravitas 'weight'[1]), or gravitation, is a natural phenomenon by which all things with mass or energy, including planets, stars, galaxies and even light,[2] are attracted to (or gravitate toward) one another. On Earth, gravity gives weight to physical objects, and the Moon's gravity causes the tides of the oceans. The gravitational attraction of the original gaseous matter present in the Universe caused it to begin coalescing and forming stars and caused the stars to group together into galaxies, so gravity is responsible for many of the large-scale structures in the Universe. Gravity has an infinite range, although its effects become weaker as objects get farther away.
I wonder if conspiracy theorists understand that vacuum is the most ideal condition to get particles to fly around the way you expect/calculate them to…
@@yoyo-co3tx That’s an age old flat Earth trope that proves whoever asked it hasn’t got the first clue how gravity works! On Earth It’s GRAVITY that’s the container!
@@terrypussypower haha i dont think they believe in gravity. apparently the flat earth moves upwards infinitely, so when you jump the earth is going up and meeting you.
“How is there dust flying around if there isn’t any wind?” when you kick something, it moves, and then falls down if it’s close to a moon or similar being crazy, isn’t it
@@emilyservice4670 if there was no gravity on the moon, the astronauts wouldn't be able to land. And if they did somehow land and got out, once they hopped, they'd just be floating back into space until something stopped them
The dust does not look like "it's "flying around" as it would on Earth where dust particles are lighter than air, allowing them to be momentarily suspended in the air.
@@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth My evidence is your many lacks of evidence, one being that there is ZERO independent evidence of humans breathing pure O2 at 5psi and below for days and weeks at a time.
Наука
It's almost like when one thing hits another thing it moves ... incredible
Exactly. Then how exactly does sound propagates in vaccum like in those nasa videos? I've been asking this repeatedly and yet no satisfying answer
@@barryallen8307 example of vids i also wanna see?
@@barryallen8307 What sounds exactly?
@@barryallen8307 what sounds?
@@barryallen8307 can you please show an example? Because all you can hear is the radios going off, which are inside the helmet
"Remind me to dust my camera, will ya?"
*two seconds later*
"Don't forget to dust your camera"
Love that.
Ive heard a lot of moon landing conspiracies. Never these ones. Shillery.
Not gonna lie whenever I say “Remind me to ___” I always forget the immediate moment after.
My boyfriend does that 😂
@@revalfresh Hoaxers aren't all the same? Ya don't say...
Haha, i always do that when someone ask me to remind them about/to do something, because i know ill forget it faster than they do.
I genuinely don't understand why someone would think you can't kick up dust in a vacuum. How would you even come up with such a stupid idea and not immediately realize it's stupid?
Well because whoever presenting it, thinks that the individuals that they’re presenting it to is stupid.
I genuinely don't understand your confusion and need to ask your question.
It's simply a question of complete ignorance of Physics and therefore a lack of understanding of what a vacuum is and how objects react in one.
Ignorance doesn't always equate with stupidity 😉
@@vladpadowicz5946 in some cases ignorance and stupidity is the same thing. Idk if thats the case here but to the ppl who know science, it might sound like that
Empty head?
Lol, right?
Probably because some people think that you need "air" to "carry" the dust
Also, the moon dust is jagged because it hasn't been worn smooth by erosion, so when it is compacted it locks into position.
This caused temporary respiratory problems for the astronauts, from what I read.
@@morgellon7877 what do you mean? surely they didn't breathe the moon dust in?
@@vibovitold maybe contamination in the shuttle?
@vibovitold unfortunately they did. The Moon dust was thrown up onto their suits while walking around (as you can see in the video). It tended to cling to the surface of the suit, not least because it's very easy to build up an electrostatic charge between the dust and suit on the moon surface. So, they ended up bringing dust into the lunar lander, which they would then breathe in eventually, leading to lung irritation for example.
@@teanosugarplease47 interesting, I've never known that - thanks
If you give the particles momentum, they can move even without air to blow them.
@@user-wh6ki2oj3l your joking right?
@@user-wh6ki2oj3l Karen a simple google search would prove otherwise
@@user-wh6ki2oj3l That is because they wore secondary boots over the flat sole shoes on the suit when outside the lander.
@@user-wh6ki2oj3l uh... literally your "argument" can be proven wrong with a quick Google search
@@user-wh6ki2oj3l it’s called Google. Use it before making stupid comments
"If there's no air, how is the dust flying around?"
Because... they kicked it?
obviously 😊🤗
It’s like the guy who thought he proved the earth was flat by taking a level on an airplane and showing that the bubble is still between the two lines.
People are just plain dumb.
HoW DiD tHeY KiCk It iF ThErE iS nO AiR oN tHe MoOn
If moon landing was success, why no more astronaut go there? Our tech is far beyond already now.. the probability must be increased
The dust settles right back down too, on Earth that dust gets caught in air currents and doesnt settle as fast
But with less gravity on the moon, it would float around a bit just like the men.
Well, I'm sure static electricity might have something to do with attracting particles on their suits, equipment, etc.
@@eetoved1758 I was about to point out that it does. He barely kicks it, and look how far it flies. The *lower* gravity really makes it go some distance
@@DT-hb3zu yep👍
We never went to the Moon because we have never been past the Van Allen Radiation Belt. That is the only 'conspiracy theory' that should be entertained.
I remember when I was a kid watching the images from the moon as soon as they were available to the News.
Somethin that caught my eye even as a kid, is that in the absence of atmosphere, the dust fell back to the ground just as fast as the pebbles.
I guess the average kid in the 60s was smarter than the average adult conspiracy theorist today.
Indeed. And remember when people said - if only those who say idiotic things had access to more information, they wouldn’t be so silly. Well, that turned out to be nonsense.
@@julianmorriscoamazing how the Internet made most people DUMBER
It never happened, have you been sleeping recently?
True. There are no dust plumes or visible air currents. It just kicks up and falls right back down
No one has ever been to the moon. It was a hoax for superpower status, and it still is.
That dust one is stupid, because they are completely forgetting that things still have inertia in a vacuum
Can you expect less from some people that don't believe in science '-')
@@kazukishinomiya9424 yeah they dont even believe in gravity, let alone inertia
well said
So explain how does the dust fall back to the surface so fast in 1/6th the gravity of earth?
@@cwstewartjr1973 how long did it take to land in the original video? and how long did it take to land here on earth? you tell us then, since you seem to know more. Why question instead of telling
If there’s no gravity on the moon, how come the shadows of the astronauts didn’t fly away?
You're onto something!
my god…
EXPOSED...
Because no air.
just out of curiosity, where is your current location? I'm not the CIA, you can trust me
The people who think this conspiracy theory is real are the same people that think you can enable gravity in a space station by clicking a button
People really thinking air is the magical substance that enables basic physics.
Until the 1800's we thought it was a good idea to cut people and bleed them out to heal them.
Stupidity knows no bounds.
Ya its more like a factor that can influence energy.
Those ppl are clearly dumb.
it makes physics harder 😭
They think air makes the world go round.
Imagine making an argument that dirt shouldn't move after being kicked
@@dtvivoAin't nobody gonna find your messages... just type it here
That's how stupid flat-earthers are.
@@dtvivo dafuq lmfao
Well in reality the video It is not quite correct, you see when you work with air conditioner, a mini split and you want a vacuum free of humidity. You have to keep a vacuum at least for half of hour, forty minutes, you have to use a digital vacuometer and in the video the guy put in his "vacuum chamber" (you don't really know if it's sealed) and turned the vacuum just for a seconds...... it's not that easy to clean the system from humidity, so the result is not conclusive
@@dtvivo The Earth is round, bozo.
"These babies are huge. They're watching us. They're lined up on the far side of the crater. Watching us." -Niel Armstrong
Isn't that from a Transformers movie?? Lol
Great, thanks for that. But there’s no chance in hell we went to the moon.
😂😂😂
@@elitemusclewhy is that?
@@Vlibba why is what?
This guy should point out that the dust flies around also because of reduced gravity. The footprint thing is self evident.
Dust flies also because of lack of air on the moon. If you kick a pebble on Earth, it can fly a few meters. If you kick dust, it won't fly far because air will stop it. On the Moon, if you kick dust, it flies exactly as far as if you kicked a pebble.
@@Alexagrigorieff Very true.
If anyone over the age of ten believes that dust can only move with air, I’m saddened
Our former President thought windmills cause cancer. People use their mouths before they use their brains.
@@BjManberries piss off mate, like the currant potato uses anything.
@@theunknown9437 Hard to take you seriously, when you lack the ability to spell a common word. It is better to be pissed off, than to be pissed on. Checkmate.
@@BjManberries it’s hard to take you seriously when your argument is picking on spelling words.
@@theunknown9437 they didn't mention anything about Joe biden but you just assumed he was a biden supporter
Everyone who takes a physics paper knows why things can fly up and down in a vacuum:
"Assume air resistance is negligible."
High school science has a unique fan base 😅😅😅... especially in China , India ...Asian countries per se
How do you take a physics paper?
How do you take a physics paper?
Exactly
@@ranchenthusiast5323 with your hands.
There is no reason to believe that your fish tank is a vacuum.
It also doesn't have any water eroding away the materials rubbing them up against each other taking away their sharpness so they also lock together and that's why the footprint is so crisp
Imagine thinking air is the only place that physics can work lol 🗿
Karen-science.
lol
@@wasifiqbal9984 yup
Wait I'll make another sentence
Imagine thinking earth is a flat object in the ss when it's neighbours are round🗿
Not as good as yours but I tried
Imagine thinking you know everything lol
“How can particles fly around in a vacuum?” They asked, while sitting on a rock hurtling through space
Big brain
They are flatearthers
wait...
Flat Earth supports Fake Moon-landing because rockets cant orbit a fucking disk
Which makes Globe Earth better because Moon-landings are definitely real
@@Project_VideoGame Ignoring Flat Earth theory. NASA themselves say They can’t pass low earth orbit. Also NASA was created by former Nazis.
@@RagingBullNuts there is no such thing as the flat earth theory.
You also can make a footprint in hollywood studio 😂
Yeah but so can you on the moon those two aren't mutually exclusive genius
Yeah you can do stuff on the moon because Nasa says so doii🤪
@@daveleekatzthis makes you angry. I sense you’re upset. Maybe you could reflect on why this bothers you and elicited a rude response from you? Also he never said or even implied they were not both possible, in fact he said they were both possible when he said “also”.
@@johncomments2730 its completely fd up to claim it's a lie when all those men and now Women All put there lives on the line many times. Ya damn right I'm angry. It's very telling that you're not angry 🤡
@@johncomments2730 you're damn right it upsets me. Those men risked their lives to further our scientific knowledge. They could have given their lives at any point in those missions. It's very telling that you don't recognize this.
Dust falling faster than the astronaut 😂 they forgot to attach a cable to it🤣
One theory holds "water." ONE.
To make the moon landing more believable they filmed it on the moon. Truly committed to the bit.
😂
I love NDT because of this joke.
Perfect
Made in a Hollywood basement, the year was 1969 what number of evil is in that? It’s so obvious that was his big move to lead you guys away from the sacred book, ITS FAKE THATS WHY WE CANT GO BACK AND EVERY SINGLE ROCKET DOSENT LEAVE THE ATMOSPHERE
😂😂😂duhhh
By their logic, you shouldn't be able to move in space at all. Why is dust any different than the astronaut?
Big brain
Yeah, and it’s a whole lot lighter than a whole ass person so if a human moves-
Well I mean 90% of them don’t even believe in space so what do you expect from people like them
And you can't even fix these people because everything you tell them is "a lie" and, even though they can't prove anything themselves, they want tou to prove what's already being proven over the internet in 10 seconds.
DUH 🙄 the astronauts are alive and the dust isn’t!
This is a joke
I think most people deep down know we didn’t go to the moon…
I think that all people who claim that Apollo Program was fake never provide any evidence to back up their claims. Take care.
I also know there is AIR in the “vacuum” of space. Because I can hear the Enterprise whiz by every time I watch Star Trek!
Me too . Isn't a vacuum what my wife has that she makes me push around the house?
The gravity is less, but it's still there. You don't need air for particles to go up when kicked, then go back down after a few seconds.
Ye
Thata what i though, me, a 16 yo.
It's remarkable how little people know about. I heard adults arguing about how much faster could a helicopter lift off the Moon because it's smaller. Boy, that was fun explaining. I don't think they ever understood me about no air.
Even if there was zero gravity (which I know there is gravity on the moon), the kinetic energy of the kick would be enough to send shit into space and go until stopped
@@-Gax- literally 35% gravity on moon sooooo, ye, that's real, the dust falling back to moon
"if there is no air on the moon, how are the dust flying?"
I lost braincells
Gravity
Yeah that was strange
@@jewelbarnett2077 Yup. And you can see how slow it falls.
I think it's the spend it goes down
momentum
It's almost like when there's no air is even easier for things to move and also have nothing to make particles settle
You can press things into flour/cornstarch and have it keep the shape too
Whoever came up with these theories should be removed from the gene pool…
😂😂😂
Edgy
@@vikzn1607 Im right though
No u
the gene forgot what is gravity
"Just because there is not air, doesn't mean physics stops existing"
Wouldn’t the physics change with a different center of gravity? 🤔
@@Stayjolly33 yeah it makes you look like you're suspended by wires when you trip and fall face first but don't hit the ground lol
@@TrillMurraytheir are reflectors on the moon they left with the right equipment you can see them, please just raw dog it and talk about the jew
It’s fake
@@TrillMurray hmm 🤔
Science beating all moon landing conspiracies at any time.
I had a science teacher in the 80s who denied the moon landing. His big objection was that there were no dust clouds when the lunar module landed and took off.
He clearly never did much research as dust is clearly observed being disturbed in the 16mm footage taken from inside the LM. Take care.
@@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth Disturbed vs dust cloud. Hmm
@@previewfirstphotos Well you are not going to get dust clouds in a vacuum if that is your point. That is why I used the word "disturbed". Take care.
ya know what else flies around in a vacuum, the whole damn universe
Prove it.
@@siddified bro missed public school 💀💀
@@azerria3416 Who?
@@siddified
You
They filmed this in a Canadian island
I'm an idiot most times, but even I have the basic knowledge that shit will move if moved
Dude I love it … right? Just left a comment about who is so dumb enough??? I’m serious I wonder who is saying these things what generation is it.
@@tootsitroll9785 old people
@@adrianolimaco8500 🤣🤣🤣
I don't understand, what do they think would happen to the dust because there's no air? Do they think it would stay stuck to the moon ground? Wouldn't that just be caused by the type of surface and nothing to do with if there is air or not?
@@prayingmantis8148 It's not the type of surface, it's just gravity. Even in vacuum and low gravity dust is still going to fall.
That's why it's called a conspiracy theory, because it's not actually true
Basic physics escapes most people 🤦🏻♀️
Hahahaha “Remind me to dust my camera too, will ya?” Immediately after, “Don’t forget to dust your camera…” I love how they can still joke around in situations as serious as this.
You can find on YT longer videos of them doing funny stuff. Playing with a ball, throwing tools, jumping up and down(which almost caused him to rip his suit.... and die)
@@cookiechaser126 Omg😂 thanks!
They're on the moon! How could they be anything but jolly?
I remembered the oat meal conversation they had too
@@vikingursigurdsson except none of that actually factually happened on the moon. None, its all hollywood basement
The dust falling and moving could be easily proven with free falling honestly. Things still fall when there is no air because gravity still exist.
Actually.......
Never gonna give you up, never gonna say goodbye...... Never gonna run around and Desert you.
@@haks7111 this is not an actual rickroll because u will need like a sentence that will end with never or smth
@@stick1384 you just mad you clicked read more 💀
@@TheBehemoth1984 you have a point LMAO i'm so pissed because i got rickrolled so many times that day
the dust getting kicked up doesn't have to do with gravity, but with transfer of momentum. if you knock a thing against a thing, it'll still move in low/null gravity. in fact, it'll move more.
It looks fake... that's how you know it's real. 😂
Kubrick had to sweep all that shit up later.😄
The air is not moving all the dust and sand in a storm. They are, literally, bouncing off each other after moved. For every action there is a reaction. It is simply a transfer of energy.
Yea, wtf is wrong with people, he literally kicking the dust in the video?
Thank you! I don't even know how this is an issue for anyone to understand.
Was dust supposed to fall down much slower due to lower gravity?
Right.
Nevermind the phuckin dust or a vacuum shoe print. How tha phuck can you go from your knees 2 popping straight up, without a phuckin wire? gravity or not, just look @ em, hop along Cassidy
“Remind me to dust my camera too”
“Don’t forget to dust your camera”
peak comedy
His comedy is out of this world.
Big Norm Macdonald energy
definitely best friends
@@necromancer6405 lol
Lol
Not to mention the moon has its own gravity . Why do people think earth is the only planet with gravity
What if you just put plain sand in there
In fact, air makes stuff flying around harder to happen since it adds resistance
This was my 1st thought, actually 🙂
I found it crazy that in the movie Interstellar everyone believes that we didn't land on the moon.
Never trust an edited comment 😂
We didn't and never will in this lifetime.
@@The_Old_War_Elephant cause what would we do on the moon? We already did everything we needed and it would be a waste of money to go back again
@@The_Old_War_Elephant Have you heard of lunar bases for nasa and china?
@@The_Old_War_Elephant they can do it every time they want to, but there is not point. And also did you know the budget of NASA was much much more in 1969 than now? Do your research before talking about a topic that you don't know about.
The issue with conspiracy theorists like these is that they don't understand even the basics of physics. A medium isn't needed for something to move, otherwise the universe would be locked in place; and fine powders don't need moisture to stick because friction and intermolecular bonds make it cohesive enough to retain the shape if not disturbed
Action lab is sponsored by NASA
Like someone pointed out in below comments:
In High school physics, simple problems like studying the trajectory and velocity of a projectile, free fall, etc., the questions usually ask you to neglect air resistance. Because taking it into consideration needlessly complicates high school physics. We can automatically assume, projectiles act and behave in vacuum almost identical to how they act on our world.
I like how people who didn’t even take high school physics feel that they are qualified to criticize and theorize about something that directly needs physics to know.
@@ioncekilledamanwithmyshoe To alot of people, things that require studying, replicable results through experiments, and peer reviewed certification are part of a giant conspiracy.
It will actually work more better in vacuum of space because of no air resistance or gravity! , and on different planets gravity will affect differently but most still be better than earth
So is the vacuum not part of the “real” world?
@@xirochamber5863 Yes vacuum is not real. It can't hurt you. Ether fills everything.
I love how no matter what, people will never be 100% professional. These guys are making history and still have time to make jokes. It's hilarious.
It’s human and it’s refreshing.
Faked. Fool.
@@robertwalker7010 Mhm yeah okay
This@@robertwalker7010 guy is going around this channel's videos and saying everything is fake lol. Seriously stop believing everything you saw on Facebook dude.
@@robertwalker7010How ignorant do you have to be to think that this whole thing was faked?
I have no idea why people would think dust or sand wouldn't fly after being kicked or disturbed on the surface of the moon. Maybe since there was no video or photographic evidence of a blast crater being made underneath the ship or no dust whatsoever being seen on the landing pads of the lunar lander some people must have just assumed it was impossible for dust to fly. Boy were they wrong! It is strange that the moon surface beneath the lander was completely undisturbed now that we know for a fact dust in a vacuum will fly????
(1) "no dust whatsoever being seen on the landing pads of the lunar lander". Incorrect, see photograph AS16-107-17442.
(2) "no ..... evidence of a blast crater"...Just 3000lb of thrust and rocket engine cut some 2m above surface so no such crater should be expected.
(3) "surface beneath the lander was completely undisturbed"...Incorrect, dust is observed being disturbed (and commented on by the astronauts) in the 16mm footage taken from inside the LM on every landing.
Take care.
Yeah but, this doesn't mean big foot doesn't exist.
“I wanted to prove all these theories wrong”
“So I took a quick trip to the moon-“
To the moon📈
Right lol
That would be a Tom Scott video.
“A RUclipsr took a trip to the moon. Here’s what happened to his lungs.”
LOL!! Good luck getting there...
"Remind me to dust my camera, will ya?"
Other guy, not a second later: "Don't forget to dust your camera."
my kind of humor
Right , theyll make sure to keep track of that footage.
@@Boom-Freaka arent they dead?
@@crazyfriend50 think so, i do know that they lost a shit ton of footage of the moon landing though.
Original comment
@@Boom-Freaka We're watching the footage, genius.
Try an experiment where you have a lunar lander break free from the moon’s gravitational pull without sufficient fuel, but somehow manage to dock with an orbiting rocket traveling at 24,000 mph.
The moon footage looks like earth gravity.
Not even slightly.
“Remind me to dust my camera will ya?”
*immediately after *
“Don’t forget to dust your camera”
That cheeky bastard. Good to see they were having fun out there
1st comment
Why copy other popular comments?
@@burakkaya9149 I didn’t even look at the other comments before I posted this, maybe just a lot of people thinking the same thing?
@@zooby11isbambam repost is repost. That doesn't change anything.
@@burakkaya9149 wdym repost lol? He literally said he didn't look at other comments and posted his own immediately after watching the video...
Why is no one talking about the god tier dad jokes being told on a multibillion dollar government operation?
“Remind me to dust my camera too, will ya?”
“Don’t forget to dust your camera”
The real chads
I didn't get the joke, explain plz
Nevermind I got it, he reminded him instantly lol
@@YounesLayachi damn that really took you a while to understand
@@OneUp-18 yeah, because I didn't listen to the joke so I had no idea how much time went between the two lines
@@YounesLayachi same had to rewatch it. I only hope to be able to do that one day.
Do people really think being on the moon is like being fucking vacuum sealed???
Lesson: You can't argue with a brain which contains a vacuum.
Its like everytime they see an object move in space, these idiots always forget that either air resistance, gravity, or momentum exist.
*exists in (not "contains")
If we haven't went to the moon how would he know what mood dust is like
@@nickc5142 they collected moondust & moonrock samples already. Infact they have it displayed on the museum of nasa.
@Tomo_mo I'm saying how would they have gotten all that if we hadn't gone to the moon
What's puzzling me is why is that even an argument? Why would the dust NOT fly around? What's the idea? What's the reasoning behind such thoughts?
Same I was scratching my head thinking "what would you expect to happen exactly?"
I've never heard anyone ever talk about that, they've always said how does the moon dust act in the same gravitational equivalence as in earth.
I believe the only reason for dust to not fly around is to have the gravity of the moon makes them so heavy so they won't fly around. But I also believe that moon's gravity to be around 1/6th only sooo
@@mediaisthevirus But it doesn't. They're flying significantly higher than on Earth and fall significantly lower. And very visibly so.
@@pasijutaulietuviuesas9174 are your eyes broken? It acts exactly like the fine particulate dust in deserts here on earth
aliens: dont come back
😄💨
You can definitely tell it’s the moon he doesn’t under stand how to walk in 0 gravity
Dust would fly around easier in a vacuum since there’s no friction between it and the atmosphere
And would fall very quickly do to that very same lack of atmosphere.
You really don't know what you're talking about, right?
@@LocoFompi lol
Based on theoretical speculation that there’s a “vacuum” in “space”..
@@nicholasdriver8253 it's not theoretical, if you take off your helmet in space, you will die due to all of the moisture in your body being sucked out in a few short seconds. But yeah man, guess I'm just wrong for actually learning.
There is no point doing these videos. Their response will be probably like "Yeah right, NASA paid you. "
But even so, in doin the test, you now know its common sense. Has nothing to do with nasa
It is stupid to do this viedo because its stupid to proof the dumbest claims. why not proof the serious ones?
Think of the children though! 🙂
Yep. Total proof we went to the moon.
Buzz Aldrin already said it never happened.
Then nasa "loses" the tech to go back.
You're a muppet. Humans will rot and go extinct on earth. We haven't and never will leave the outermost atmosphere. They go to the ISS practically in street clothes now.
Not space. Still in the outer ring of the stratosphere. Van Allen radiation plus the fact that America nukes everything make it impossible to leave.
Great job man! I watched it on television when I was a little kid and as an adult I always believed it happened
"Remind me to dust my camera, will ya?"
"Remember to dust your camera."
Cheeky bastard lol
You ever consider the surfice of the planet is mostly dust, just like the genitals of your mom
Yup. That was the joke that was told. Thank you.
@@iplaywhatiwant3738 you're welcome, happy to help
To be fair he never set a timer 😂
Ha, didn't catch that initially.
People will make a conspiracy out of literally anything.
I have a conspiracy that there is a conspiracy to make a conspiracy out of any advancement in science and technology.
Prove it
@@marcmussenge7533 You are not real and the dark gods are changing my room's temperature not sunlight
the government made you say that obvs
@@patrickdwyer320 what
I guess deserts are wetter than I thought
He almost convinced me they were actually on the moon 😂😂😂
If you want to convince people they weren't on the moon, then you'll need to find something convincing...
@@lappansommer546You mean something like how did they survived the van allen belt on their way back and forth or the lost plans about the rocket or the lost original film material, or would the movie sequence be enough about the fake half earth, which was only the half window from the inside of the space dome? And at least i accidently also saw the original footage with their wires on their costumes and their whole film set. Sorry for that, but better to say so before sora will came out soon and the truth is going to die at all 😢
@@lappansommer546 The evidence that we never went to the Moon is overwhelming! You just refuse to see it because you want to be a sheep. We've never been off this Earth. You can't get off this Earth.
Blimey are there still people out there that thinks the Americans never landed on the moon!!!! Amazing!!!! I mean if they faked the landings the Russians would have been all over it!!! And there are photos taken by satellites of the lunar landing sites over the last 20 years!!! Of course they landed on the moon!!!
@@Copelandscampwhy would every single rocket scientist not just in NASA but around the globe lie then??? what about all of the satellites, space stations and rockets? they were all just made up? every single engineer involved, from the companies used to manufacture specific parts, to the physicists and scientists who do all of the calculations and experiments are just LYING to make us THINK we can get off earth?? are you insane? do you even realize how many people, not just engineers directly working for NASA were involved in the AMERICAN space launch alone? not to mention that this applies to EVERY OTHER COUNTRY which has made attempts to put satellites, space stations, and rockets in space. holy shit.
Go back to 1969 and live video feed and recreate that tin foil space craft. We'll you could do that in your kitchen. Don't forget the sparkles when you take off
Fun fact: moon dust is also razor sharp since there’s nothing to erode it. It’s also very electrostatic, or it can cling really easily. There have even been cases of the dust ripping through four layers of Kevlar in an astronauts boot.
Source? Sounds terrifying
Ohh so that’s why they wear suits on the moon (Joke)
Pocket sand just got more fun
It's only Dust because it's shards of rock pulverized by impacts!
I learned that from Lemmino
I can't even imagine how amazing it would be to be walking on the moon. It'd be so surreal.
yeah!! imagine seeing Earth from there!!
Sorry but space is fake.
But did they 😊
@@cappiece3786 yes they did. People who dont believe in the moon landing are the same people who will argue with you over anything. They will continue to deny and move the goal posts to suit their argument and will never give up.
@@cappiece3786 they did
I love how the original video tape of the moon had to be deleted and reused to save money, our government is great at saving money
The dust is flying around the same way he’s flying around, under his power. He kicks it up then gravity makes him and the dust fall back down at the same rate.
I like how people keep forgetting about the existence of physics
Can't forget what you haven't learned.
Most people think heavier things fall faster.
@@davep8221 most people don’t know what they are talking about lol
forgetting . they never knew ... average american cant name 5 countries and you think they ever knew physics
@@myname-mz3lo Argentina, Andorra, Azerbaijan, Armenia, Austria I’m an American who can name 5 countries and all start with the letter A
@@davep8221in an atmosphere heavier things usually fall fast, unless of course you increase its drag proportionally
I love how peoples brains turn off when it comes to the moon.
Moon is Chinese satellite, used to track you
@@FalconTheFries i cant even tell if someone’s being serious on the internet anymore
@@Villosa64 same
Moon is the greatest atomic bomb built by the soviets
Moon is gru secret base that he makes crack in
And yet, with all the space probes and huge telescopes. Still can't see the flag, footprints and everything else left behind on the moon
Incorrect. There is no terrestrial telescope in existence that has the resolution to resolve Apollo objects on the lunar surface. But satellites in lunar orbit from 4 different countries have identified and verified the Apollo landing sites on the lunar surface exactly where the should be. Take care.
No one ever landed on the moon
Then produce the evidence to back up your claim. Take care.
Bruh the fact that theres no air on the moon is exactly the reason why so much dust is kicked up… Air makes it harder for things to move not easier
Indeed! Could do the experiment the other way around: try to move dust in a high pressure environment
And with less gravity everything is lighter so when kicked it moves farther same when they walk less force to jump farther!
Astronauts = Objects likewise Sand particles also = objects
If astronauts can movie and jump in no air
So does sand particles
Astronauts = Sand particles = Can move
Well, the reason the dirt flies around on the moon in the same way it does on Earth, is because, like the Earth, the moon is FLAT! 😁
Besides the fact, that the dust is statically charged and sticks to everything.
Gravity, momentum, and friction exist inside of a vacuum? Crazy! It's almost like physics exist in space!
right? who wouldve thunked it?
It cant be real
Physics don't explain why that dust fell back down to the Earth so quickly or why they had to slow the video down.
@@mikebass5929 gravity on moon is 1/6 of that on earth.
@@vintage8818 well I just busted you right there buddy if it's 1/6 of Earth gravity then it would take 1/6 of the fuel that it took to put that rocket into outer space and I didn't see any silos on the moon lander.
Now, show us how they were able to go through the Van Allen Radiation Belt without getting fried.
I can't wait for that one.
Here are the words of Dr. James Van Allen himself: "The outbound and inbound trajectories of the Apollo spacecraft cut through the outer portions of the inner belt and because of their high speed spent only about 15 minutes in traversing the region and less than 2 hours in traversing the much less penetrating radiation in the outer radiation belt. The resulting radiation exposure for the round trip was less than 1% of a fatal dosage - a very minor risk among the far greater other risks of such flights. I made such estimates in the early 1960s and so informed NASA engineers who were planning the Apollo flights. These estimates are still reliable. The recent Fox TV show, which I saw, is an ingenious and entertaining assemblage of nonsense. The claim that radiation exposure during the Apollo missions would have been fatal to the astronauts is only one example of such nonsense." Dr. James A. Van Allen.
Of course he's going to say those words in order to protect the integrity of NASA's lies. We don't know any different to argue against him.
However, when NASA airs a program like they did on national television
On March 9th, 2015 a NASA spokesperson admitted that they cannot send crafts through the Van Allen Belts. "Straight from a NASA employee's own mouth; "we must solve these challenges before we send people through this region of space."
Sounds a bit contradictory, wouldn't you say, Mr. Van Allen?
@@joaquinmenendez2059 Nope, no contradiction at all. You really should watch the full "Orion - Trial by Fire" documentary and make some effort to understand what the engineer (Not a spokesperson) Kelly Smith was saying. and the context of the comments.
"My name is Kelly Smith and I work on navigation and guidance for Orion"...It is clear and obvious that everything that he says is in this context and is about the Orion spacecraft. Do better than cherry-picking comments out of context and pretending that they mean other than do. Take care.
@@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth Not cherry picking. Merely sharing an observation that entails some discrepancies. And your reply doesn’t prove anything.
All you're doing is demonstrating how dedicated you are playing the role of a pro-NASA advocate. And while doing so you quote textbook after textbook of old arguing points that fail to hold any water.
Do you have any thoughts of your own?
Or are not creative enough to come up with any proof that Man went to the moon and back in a tin can?
Forget about landing on the moon.
How about this one. I want you to look at the video released and aired by NASA regarding Venus In Transit, and explain to me how is it that you can see the edge right through venus as it moves across. The edge of the sun is seen through Venus clear as day. Please explain that one to me. Prove your loyalty to NASA with your answer.
If you should by some miracle happen to find an answer in your haste rustling through your textbooks or laptop I'll be convinced that you might be a paid shill.
@@joaquinmenendez2059 A lot of waffle and attempted deflection. You attempted to cherry-pick comments out of context and you have been called out. Deal with it. Take care.
I was under the impression that all planets have atmospheres so not a complete vacuum but basically 99.999 percent vacuum
It depends on the planet or moon. The moon does technical have an extremely tenuous atmosphere but its pressure is millions of millions of times less than Earths. For all practical purposes the moon can be considered to be in a vacuum. Take care.
Its gravity keeping stuff "down" on the moon surface.
There is a trace amount of sodium around the moon which gets pushed off by the solar wind. During the new moon phase it blows towards and past earth and sensitive telescopes detect a slightly streetlight-orange glow.
Apply their logic to anything else and it completely fails. It’s like saying planets can’t move in space because they’re in a vacuum😂😭😭
It’s because the moon still has its own gravidty
Nor would the man himself be able to move😂
@Pope Shabba are you an Unus or an Annus
Hey pope. Earth is flat. This youtuber is with the government cooking up some conspiracy.
@@saidarahaasayyangalam3445 Heh. Jokes.
I like how people who didn’t even take high school physics feel that they are qualified to criticize and theorize about something that directly needs physics to know.
But they watched a RUclips video and read a Twitter post about it, so that makes them an expert on the matter.
them after they learn something useless in science class: *Expet*
And there is also some idiot that believes that moon is just a big chunk of rocks that supposed to not have dust particles as similar as sand in the Earth 😂. I do make an argument with that person and almost try to beat that person.
"Democracy is good"
@@Ari-ft3lm zionism is better...
I think the bigger question is, if there is no gravity, how did he fall to the ground?
Nope...the bigger question is why you seem to think that "there is no gravity" on the moon. Gravity is associated with mass. The moon has mass, therefore the moon has gravity. Gravity on the lunar surface is about 17% of that on earth. Take care.
There is gravity it's just a lot less than on Earth
Waiting for the flat earthers to come up with their own excuse for why science is wrong.
The dust probably flies further and faster as there's no air resistance, although the smaller particles would've benefitted from being suspended in the air for some time.
We see dust fly up and out quickly and drop quickly so it literally does look like dust in a vacuum..
The dust obviously can fly up if kicked on the on the moon, however it will fall much slower [specially fine dust] because of something called gravity which is much less than the earths. This is the same except the video is slowed down...
@@googlesucks100ballsandshaf6hmm.. I'm not sure if this reply is meant for me as it doesn't seem relevant but as you have my attention "something called gravity" doesn't work like that. In a vacuum (moon) e"specially fine dust" will fall at the same speed as larger dust. However, it may appear to land later because it has gone higher than larger debris (transfer of kinetic energy from boot to dust).
On Earth fine dust stays in the air because, well because it's suspended in the air.
If Earth were a vacuum, yes it would pull stuff down quicker (and not let it fly so high in the first place) vs the moon but it's not going to compare to dust suspended in a gaseous environment
@@mixerfistit5522 he is probably saying that it will fall much slower in comparison to earth as moon has 6 times less g (1.667 m/s^2 i believe).
@@Itsgyro possibly but they mentioned 'especially fine dust' falling slower due to 'something called gravity'. Seemed like they were giving a snarky lesson on gravity but messed it up lol
@@mixerfistit5522 it’s not a vacuum tho it’s an atmosphere and the moon has an atmosphere of itself just somewhat weak so it won’t have as much of an effect against it as a vacuum does
Best part is... without air, that astronaut's footprint will forever be preserved, unless someone or something mess with it.
Maybe it’s still there lol
Well maybe in a perfect environment but with micrometeorite impacts that’s extremely unlikely
Unless it snows again and covers em up
The Hollywood set for the moon landing had already been dismantled unfortunately
@@busboy3232 LOL you people are silly with your stupid ideas of Hollywood movie sets LOL stop smoking your cars tail pipe.
Yea in a vacuum but NOT on the moon...
That makes no sense
It's no benefit to argue with people who think gravity is due to atmospheric pressure.
So what is gravity
@@rhozq Gravity (from Latin gravitas 'weight'[1]), or gravitation, is a natural phenomenon by which all things with mass or energy, including planets, stars, galaxies and even light,[2] are attracted to (or gravitate toward) one another. On Earth, gravity gives weight to physical objects, and the Moon's gravity causes the tides of the oceans. The gravitational attraction of the original gaseous matter present in the Universe caused it to begin coalescing and forming stars and caused the stars to group together into galaxies, so gravity is responsible for many of the large-scale structures in the Universe. Gravity has an infinite range, although its effects become weaker as objects get farther away.
@@rhozq the thing that one smart dude invented
your pfp definitely checks out on what you think, you think high enough about yourself that informing and teaching people about what they dont know
@@chmleon he does look like a teacher huh
Now use your vacuum to disprove flat earthers😅
Fellas who questioned this might have skipped the class of newtonian mechanics.
Most of them never even took a basics physics class.
Conspiracy nuts always think they know how it "should" be. When they have no clue..
I wonder if conspiracy theorists understand that vacuum is the most ideal condition to get particles to fly around the way you expect/calculate them to…
I wonder if conspiracy theorist understand basic mechanical physics.
Down to, and including, action=-(reaction)
I wonder if you can demonstrate a gas existing withing a vacuum without a container
@@yoyo-co3tx That’s an age old flat Earth trope that proves whoever asked it hasn’t got the first clue how gravity works! On Earth It’s GRAVITY that’s the container!
Yeah! That’s why Commander David Scott on Apollo 15 dropped the hammer 🔨 and the feather 🪶 simultaneously on the moon’s surface!
@@terrypussypower haha i dont think they believe in gravity. apparently the flat earth moves upwards infinitely, so when you jump the earth is going up and meeting you.
“How is there dust flying around if there isn’t any wind?”
when you kick something, it moves, and then falls down if it’s close to a moon or similar being
crazy, isn’t it
I just found out about this stuff called gravity. It's absolutely wild
People are morons on this planet. Can’t believe these idiotic questions are called conspiracy theories.
@@yellowflash7696 tell that to the ppl who said “moon landing is fake
@@Dastardly_Duo thought there was t gravity on the moon...
@@emilyservice4670 if there was no gravity on the moon, the astronauts wouldn't be able to land. And if they did somehow land and got out, once they hopped, they'd just be floating back into space until something stopped them
The dust does not look like "it's "flying around" as it would on Earth where dust particles are lighter than air, allowing them to be momentarily suspended in the air.
The more important question: How come we have never been back? 😂
Nope, the more important question is how come you do not know about Apollo 12, 14, 15, 16 & 17? Take care.
All staged.
@@NoremacOktik An your evidence is? Take care.
@@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth
My evidence is your many lacks of evidence, one being that there is ZERO independent evidence of humans breathing pure O2 at 5psi and below for days and weeks at a time.