The moment man first stepped on the Moon - BBC World Service
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 16 фев 2020
- Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin's Moonwalk is one of the 20th Century's most iconic moments.
Click here to subscribe to our channel 👉🏽 bbc.in/3VyyriM
“That’s one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind.” These were the famous words commander Neil Armstrong spoke as he descended the ladder of the lunar module to begin his Moonwalk at 02:56 GMT on 21 July 1969. He was followed on to the surface shortly afterwards by lunar module pilot Buzz Aldrin. Command module pilot Michael Collins remained in lunar orbit whilst Armstrong and Aldrin explored the Moon's surface.
Check out our podcast 13 Minutes to the Moon here about how the first Moon landing was saved: • 13 Minutes to the Moon
Image credit: Nasa
----------------
This is the official BBC World Service RUclips channel.
If you like what we do, you can also find us here:
Instagram 👉🏽 / bbcworldservice
Twitter 👉🏽 / bbcworldservice
Facebook 👉🏽 / bbcworldservice
BBC World Service website 👉🏽 www.bbc.co.uk/worldserviceradio
Thanks for watching and subscribing!
#BBCWorldService #WorldService 
Наука
I saw Buzz Aldrin speak for an hour here in NZ🇳🇿 in 2010 about his experience ON the Moon and in space.. RIP Neil Armstrong 🚀
This three are most adventures and greatest man in history
This are people who know where they go but not known how return
Check out our podcast 13 Minutes to the Moon here about how the first Moon landing was saved: ruclips.net/p/PLz_B0PFGIn4f0xYPhOk0wIASOYE8-1Wbz
Marvelous✨
We think so too! Have you watched our podcast 13 Minutes to the Moon? It's about how the first Moon landing was saved: ruclips.net/p/PLz_B0PFGIn4f0xYPhOk0wIASOYE8-1Wbz
@@BBCWorldService😂😂😂
Yeah, I ws there with Armstrong when we took the picture in Hollywood, it's AWESOME..💃💃🕺🕺😷
yes and you were there in the back street porn movie your mother starred in when you were accidentally created...
The Perfect Neighbor
If you had to choose a “next-door neighbor” for the earth, you could not improve on the moon. Its diameter measures just over a quarter of the earth’s. Thus, when compared with other moons in our solar system, our moon is unusually large in relation to its host planet. This, however, is no coincidence.
For one thing, the moon is the principal cause of ocean tides, which play a vital role in the planet’s ecology. The moon also contributes to earth’s stable spin axis. Without its tailor-made moon, our planet would wobble like a spinning top, perhaps even tipping right over and turning on its side, as it were! The resulting climatic, tidal, and other changes would be catastrophic.
Was it necessary to have music playing in the background? Hello? BBC? Anyone home?
No, the music detracts from the video,
😅😅😅😅well information good show you 😅😅😅
Footprimt has shadow, interesting.
It is a 3 dimensional object, so yes: of course it has.
Где. Етих. Астранафтыв.
Гроб. Кладбище. Может. На.
Луне. Осталось. 🖐️
How did they manage to reattached to their friend ?
The same way that other spacecraft have been doing for 50 years.
satrun v rocket
🗨️🇺🇸
That fly ash shure looks damp for a vacuum
Made in a Hollyweird studio!
Another mindless comment by you geoff, when do you get around to producing evidence to back them up? Take care.
@@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth back up your moon landing claim by providing real evidence! Take care!
@@geoffbirchall7552 Yes, you should back up your claims with "real evidence" but you never do. Take care. PS: Any update on where the Sun goes at night on your "flat earth". You still haven't given an answer to that question that is consistent with observable reality.
@@TheWokeFlatEarthTruthsee no evidence again, just diverting calling me a flat earthier! Classic!
@@geoffbirchall7552 Yes, correct, I see that you have again provided no evidence to back up your claims, you never do. And yes, in previous threads you have stated that the Earth is "flat" yet as usual you never even attempt to provide any evidence for that claim. Take care.
The neural network from Google considered that the photo of American astronauts on the Moon was a fake.
The neural network marks in red those places that it considers to be fake. That is, almost all the objects in this photo seem unreal to her. At the same time, the photograph of the Chinese lunar rover does not raise any special questions for her.
The neural network from google considers that 98% of 'conspiracy theorists' are mentally retarded closet flerfers....
The neural network scanned your brain and found it to be missing @@KPL400
But was it an original photograph?
@@redditsucksyo The neural network determined that you're a regular Bart Sibrel.
Adam moon mars more more allways 😄☺😊😃😂😁😀😊😄☺😊😀😁😂😃😄😄😃😂😁😀😊☺eve😄😃😁😁😀😀😊☺😀😁😁😂😃😄..........
who toke the shot 📷 ??? 😕
No person took it. The camera was installed in a compartment on the side of the Lunar Module descent stage. Armstrong first opened this compartment and then the camera pointed towards the ladder and filmed Armstrong when he climbed down. No one had to operate this camera.
Later the astronauts placed this camera on a tripod so that it could film their activities.
The famous first footprint does not match the spacesuits they war. Hmmm
The true conspiracy was why the spacesuits were in armed conflict.
the government is so good at creating a fake moon landing but making sure the footprints match was too hard for them
They wore [NOT "war", you idiot] galoshes on the surface, took them off before returning, to minimize internal dust contamination.
Because he was wearing a cover on his boots
@@user-hx6gs9rq7u Because, because. because, because...
Wasn’t this fake
No
Yes. The U.S. Lied to the whole world, enabled by Stanley Kubrick, the space video producer who made the movie, 2001, a space odyssey. Notice that astronauts from other countries don't go along with the big lie. The international space station, now in geo earth orbit, is the furthest man has ever gone In person. Many many reasons and ways to prove.
@@mrdman094081"Yes. "
No. It wasn't.
"enabled by Stanley Kubrick,"
Kubrick had nothing to do with the moon landings.
" is the furthest man has ever gone In person."
This is nonsense, because 24 men were in the vicinity of the moon.
" Many many reasons and ways to prove."
This is nonsense. there are no such reasons and there is no such proof.
No
I don't think a human would leave a footprint that deep on frozen land with very weak gravity.
The land isn't frozen. It's in the sunlight. It's probably fairly hot. Either way, for it to solidify, it would have to contain water. It's the WATER that freezes; not the soil. And yes - the footprint would be that deep. The lunar regolith was much like a powder. It will compress a lot. It also has very ragged edges, so it clumps well - making a nice distinct footprint.
Source: Trust me bro
"I don't think a human would leave a footprint that deep on frozen land with very weak gravity."
1. Not frozen. 2. the life support system and the space suit had a mass of about 200 Kg. Tell us: How deep is a footprint on earth with that weight?
Stop lying.
Another ridiculously short facile comment from a reality denier without even an attempt to provide any evidence to back it up.
Mas falso que la plandemia
Is the Earth flat😂?.
ni sabes escribir
@@Sam-nb8evIt would be to him
Where are the crazy deniers?
Plenty braindeads around.
are you one of those physics deniers?
@@marxman00 Moonlandingdeniers deny physics too. Andre doesn't.
Marvel studio is better than.
just say you are dumb
Flying ash with no gravity😅
"no gravity".............The moon has gravity. All objects with mass have gravity. Take care.
The Moon has gravity you dickhead
แหกตา
100%