Acts 10: Peter’s Vision - 119 Ministries
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 16 сен 2024
- So many read Acts 10 and say: "There you have it. All things are now clean for food." Little do they know that this text has NOTHING to do with food. This video is critical for anyone who thinks Acts 10 is about God redefining His dietary instructions.
www.119ministr...
Follow the above link to partner with 119 Ministries and support ongoing free teaching production.
Please note that we will not be closely monitoring nor responding to many comments on RUclips.
Please join the discussion of this teaching on our website at: 119ministries.c...
or reach us privately through the Contact Us form on our website: 119ministries.c...
Thank you so much for your continued and prayerful support. May YHWH bless you and keep you.
Shalom
Excellent! Elohim bless you!
Thank you so much for the teaching! This makes so much more sense now
Thank you! This is one of the first things God convicted me of when I became Christian 20 yrs ago but I’ve never had a teaching thorough enough to explain why I do this.
Amen glory be to Elohim!
Amazing teaching ❤
Thank you
It is written in Matthew 15:11; What goes into someone's mouth does not defile them, but what comes out of their mouth, that is what defiles them."
Yes, but that was written within the bounds of a specific CONTEXT - which you seem to have missed. Fortunately, the Messiah Himself tells us exactly what that context is: Matthew 15:20 NKJV These are the things which defile a man, but to eat with unwashed hands does not defile a man." 👉to eat with unwashed hands👈
All food is clean, but not all animals are food.
@@sourmilkministries9445 well said
@@behold_a_son I did not add the condition of unwashed hands. Performing the man-made Pharisaical hand-washing ritual was the context of the entire incident. This is reiterated by the Messiah Himself in Matthew 15.
Matthew 15:20 NKJV These are the things which defile a man, but to eat with unwashed hands does not defile a man."
Moreover, with all due respect, there are some additional fatal flaws in your interpretation.
1. When the passage speaks of "food", it is not speaking of unclean meats, which would never even be considered as food.
2. The passage is speaking against the doctrines and commandments of men, and not against the Commandments of God. Not eating unclean meats is a Commandment of God.
3. The context of Yeshua's remarks are that the foods people eat are not what causes them to become evil doers, murders, adulterers, fornicators, thieves, false witnesses, and blasphemers. He is not saying or implying that it's okay to eat unclean meats - as that would be an act of disobedience. And, mind you, that disobedience would come from one's heart, and not from the porkchop they ate. In other words: Porkchops do not inflict people with the disease of disobedience. No, disobedience comes from within.
@@sourmilkministries9445 yes I see that I was incorrect. It is written as you said. So I deleted my reply because it may cause confusion. I just want to know more about the Scriptures. I want to know why did God gave commandments for the distinction of food? Is it because of cleanliness and prevention of diseases? Or maybe because of avoiding pagan fellowship? But isn't technology changed since then...honestly I have always eaten food without distinction after praying over it and I believe the food to be sanctified after praying. If I just know the reason behind the commandment then it wouldn't be this confusing and all would probably find a common answer. Thank you for reading!
Thank you so much for the lesson as I have now a clear understanding of this chapter
Thank you so much! For some reason, probably The Holy Spirit, I just couldn't eat pigs anymore about 7 years ago but was confused about this. Toda and shalom.
Ma'am... you choosing to not eat pork is a personal choice.... it's not a biblical one. The guy in the video is lost and confused. I am NOT hacking on him. He is just interpreting the vision wrong.
The vision was twofold. 1. To show Peter he would be going to the gentiles to preach. 2. To show Peter it was ok to eat anything.... as long as we pray and ask The Lord to bless our food. Then it becomes clean. Also please check out 1 Timothy 4:1-5 if you have questions I would be glad to help.
God bless
@@jackmcbain3525 The father gave instructions in Leviticus 11 as to what is food and what is not. I would advise you to go reread that before you try to advise somebody else for having conviction from the Holy Spirit as to what it reads and how it does not Read.
@@jackmcbain3525 - How can you add to Peter’s own interpretation in Acts??? He very clearly interpreted his vision in *one* way and made *no* mention of being able to eat unclean animals. Have you EVER thought maybe the Father has reasons for us not eating such animals? Maybe His dietary guidelines are FAR and ABOVE our own reasoning and understanding?
This is why eating unclean animals is an abomination to the Father. He gave us these laws, a yoke if you will, for a reason. It’s probably best to follow His laws without trying to add to His word.
So those who say pig is edible are saying He came to earth in flesh kept commandments & taught them are saying after He died He abolished commandments?? Took Him dying for pig to be ok? Midas we’ll be cannibal too, huh? No limits …. 🙄
not true it was not about showing it was ok to eat unclean foods, the simple fact is ,peter was the only one to mention eating unclean food and it was not mentioned again from the time that peter realized what the vision meant , ,Kill and Eat meant ,use the Gospel represented by the sheet ; to devour the filth of flesh and evil ways, you cannot bless what God has cursed, when pray over your food,it has to be sanctified by Both the word and prayer 1 tim; 4 ; 4, sanctified in leviticus 20, only place to find where it was, set apart. which by the way means sanctified, thanks for your time
@@jackmcbain3525
I love this! Great word! I am reminded of an argument I had with someone stating that When Christ said 'it is not what goes into the mouth of a man that makes him unclean, but what comes out of his mouth' he abolished the food laws. He wasn't talking about food! He was debating the Pharisees argument against his disciples for not following their dogmatic, Talmudic tradition which said that they should not eat with unwashed hands! Again and again Jesus chastises the Pharisees for their added laws. These people miss the point entirely in their desire to justify eating unclean. The church today 'after their own lusts, heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears.'
If that's the case then you should probably consider having a farm incase you have ever worked at a factory the "unclean" meat touches the other meat and sometimes the vegies
Very well said Scotty.!!!
Where in the vision does it say he was fighting the pharisees.? The vision WAS about food. It was to prepare Peter for his ministry to the gentiles. The vison was twofold. 1. To show Peter he would be going to the gentiles to preach. 2. To show Peter it was ok to eat other foods, ANY food. The vision showing clean and unclean animals was symbolic to show he/they could eat what was previously considered unclean. We just pray over our food and ask The Lord to bless it... then it becomes clean.
Check out 1 Timothy 4:1-5
I'll be around if you have any questions
@@jackmcbain3525 yeah the Pharisees were not directly in the vision. But in his epistles that were written around the time, there were those from judea coming and preaching circumcision and such for salvation. It's very much about this pharisee doctrine of the seperation of gentiles and jews. It was this enmity which Christ abolished, that wall of partition. Btw there was a real wall of partition which had a sign which informed gentiles that their death was on their own head should they proceed further.
@@ScottyNatsar plz explain what partition you are referring to. The only partition I am aware that was "deadly" was the curtain in the temple separating the front 2/3(estimating) from the other 1/3 behind the curtain... the Holy of Holies. No one was allowed back there except the high priest who was scheduled to go back there and perform his Holy duties. If that's not what you are referring to... pls explain... thank you
Well done.
HALLELUYAH!!
Excellent!
It breaks my heart that YHshuah calls people to Love & then so many keep fighting over doctrine. It must break Paul’s heart too when his words are continually twisted & all he too wanted was unity. Pointing even back to the Ruah ha’ Qodesh being grieved by this continual bickering over Peters words. Thus YHWHs Heart too (Proverbs 27:11). Please don’t let ha’Satan win family. This was an Excellent teaching brothers thank you so much for this video & doing the Work of our A’don despite all the persecution that comes. May you be baruk in New Yerushalayim for fearlessly proclaiming The Truth! Psalm 119:142 🤗🙌🏼👏🏼 The Whole Word Is Everlasting Ah’mein.
But,, we do have to contend for the faith bro, with all respect for each other
It's surprising that anyone would even consider that the passage in question was referring to food, when it's clearly explained as you read along, what God referring to.
Perfect.
Yahshua said He talked in mysteries so the rebellious would not understand, keep them in their darkness. Why wouldn't His Father do likewise, since they are one, in unison? The reason animals were used in the vision was to help people who are deceived. Imagine if pig-eating Christians were doing so in all-out rebellion against what they knew to be true. But since they're deceived by centuries of twisting of Paul's words, they aren't as culpable as if they flat out knew they were in stone, cold rebellion.
Yes, Peter was to escape the demands of rabbinic law if he should preach salvation to the Gentiles. Three times, "Kill and eat." He knew he wasn't to kill and eat. That's why he pondered to know the meaning. He was being shown while his refusal to violate Torah from Mt. Sinai is good, he was not bound to Babylonian Talmudic mandates. This story is in part, to show Peter's strength of character to not violate, transgress. This was proving ground for Peter as much as the four INITIAL mandates for Gentiles in Acts 15. Peter prove that he would not bend. Now, we all know he was a good choice to hob-nob with Gentiles and introduce salvation to them. This test proved Peter's character and was not a change of times and laws to eat the abomination.
The "kill and eat" was to show Peter it was/IS ok to eat anything. They were not/we are not bound by the law to refrain from certain foods... the vision was twofold... 1. To show Peter he would be going to the gentiles to preach. 2. That due to the fulfillment of the law: Jesus's birth, death, and resurrection... there is NO more law. Therefore, all foods MAY be eaten.. but doesn't mean you MUST change the way you eat now. Peter deciding to eat as he always had was a personal choice... but due to the vision he also knew it was ok for others to eat what they want... praying over their food and asking The Lord to bless it... thereby becoming clean.
*sigh*.... you are mislead... you speak as if we are still under Mosaic Law. The birth, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ FULFILLED THE LAW... there was/is no more Mosaic Law. People can't say they are true modern day Christians and STILL try to follow the old law. The law and prophets foretold of the Messiah. They understood that when the Messiah came it would mean THE END of the law. There is SOOOO much confusion and misleading on this site. As a Christian today you can eat WHATEVER you wish... there is no law in the New Testament that forbids us from eating certain foods. All we are required to do is give thanks and ask The Lord to bless the food we are about to eat. THAT IS ALL.... the Old Testament is the history of Israel and the world. Most people don't even know up until Noah, that people were all vegetarians... it was only AFTER the flood God told Noah eating meat was ok... but at that time nothing was specific about what a person could and could not eat... in relation to meat of any kind. The ONLY people who could be considered still living under the law are Jewish people who STILL believe the Messiah is coming... they didn't/don't believe the Messiah has come yet... that if Jesus was anything He was a prophet. It's kinda sad they don't believe Jesus already came, preached, healed, died, arose from the dead... and fulfilled the Law. When a prophecy is fulfilled it means it is DONE.... OVER.... there are NO restrictions on what we may eat. If anyone DOES believe they have to follow the old law.... then they do not believe Jesus fulfilled the law... of you don't believe Jesus fulfilled the law... how can you consider yourself a Christian.?? It makes absolutely no sense.
Christians ARE allowed to eat pork... or anything else... see my reply below... I thought it had posted here...
@@jackmcbain3525
Yeshua, (Jesus) said in his Sermon on the Mount that not one jot nor tittle of the law WILL PASS AWAY UNTIL THE WHOLE BIBLE IS FULFILLED.
The definition of fulfill is not the same as to do away with or to end. Your words here make Jesus a liar.
Jesus "did fulfill" what the prophets and the Word wrote about him.
His part was finished in God's plan for salvation. He did away with the law of sin and death.
Many people leave those last words off.... sin and death.
Narrow is the way and few people find it. He wrote these words for a purpose.
Many, I repeat, many are on the same road that you're on. I have spent my whole life on that same wide road.
But I now thank God for opening my eyes as to the path I was on, giving me the understanding to know the difference.
And only the Holy Spirit can give this understanding.
@3:28 "You mean like when God told the Israelites to kill everyone like all women and children of some tribes when conquering the promised land?" Just because it isn't something we clearly know it's from God's law doesn't mean He can't still command us to do it. I know now that the reason was because most likely those were descendants of the Nephilin, but this is one of the reasons why a lot of people question God. We can't put God in a box... He is God and sometimes He tells us to do things we don't understand. He absolutely meant it when He told Abraham to kill Isaac, but then the angel stopped him from doing it because Abraham passed the test. Sometimes we don't pass the test.
Nicely put.!! Thank you for your faith and standing firm for The Lord
Peter was asked to eat the common not the unclean. “Common=Clean but put beside the unclean” because in the SAME sheet were both kinds of animals together. Thus in their TRADITION making the actually clean becomes CEREMONIALLY unclean.
“And the voice spake unto him again the second time, What God hath cleansed, that call not thou common.”
Acts 10:15 KJV
There was no more "ceremonial" clean or unclean... the coming of Christ fulfilled the law... there was no more law... hence, there was no longer anything ceremonial. They could eat whatever they wanted... but some apostles kept to their old eating habits by CHOICE.. not because they had to.
BINGO! What you said is true, JM jeff! In fact, we have a video which explains that. The video is entitled: *_Video 8: Peter's Vision - What Torah Keepers get WRONG!_* (Don't let the title fool you, as this is a PRO-Torah video.)
common was a reference to Gentiles
@@jackmcbain3525 unclean animals are NOT referred to as food or meat , always referred to as flesh
Jesus told peter feed my Sheep, another instance He said , I have sheep that are NOT of THIS fold, now we know why it was Peter that had the vision ,the sheet represented the Gospel in the 4 corners of the world ,to Everyone not just the Jews
thank you very much for this i really need to know the story but there's no even a single thing came in my mind but then i saw this and listen to it now i know what to teach my family.
This video is misleading. The sheet had EVERYTHING to do with animals. The vision was twofold 1. To show Peter he would be going to the gentiles to preach the good news. 2. To show Peter it WAS ok to eat anything... the vision showed Peter that what others eat is not an offence... as long as we ask The Lord to bless the food... then, no matter what they are eating becomes clean.
Also check out 1 Timothy 4:1-5 it reinforces what I am saying... but these are not my "opinions"... everything I've said comes straight from the bible.
If you have any questions plz just ask.
you got it right, just read everything you can find of peter and Jesus walk together you can then understand ,even why had to be peter to receive the vision people all thru the bible were referred to as animals in one way or another, the was the gospel that to lift us from the earth, and death, peter had the vision also because he would pretend he was not talking to the gentiles when Jews were around,at least that is one reason
And he saith unto them, Are ye so without understanding also? Do ye not perceive, that whatsoever thing from without entereth into the man, it cannot defile him;
Because it entereth not into his heart, but into the belly, and goeth out into the draught, purging all meats?
And he said, That which cometh out of the man, that defileth the man.
Mark 7:18-20
Though it does not clearly stated about those unclean foods, but it is very clear that eating those once stated unclean food will only goes into the stomach not in the heart. Because the HEART IS NOT PART OF THE DIGESTIVE SYSTEM?😁😁😁
you left out what was really being referred to, the first thing mentioned in the chapter was , eating meat with out washing hands ,the 2nd was He was talking to people who never ate unclean meats/foods ,what is taught here was what they were teaching was not biblical ,the food they were eating without washing hands could Not defile but the unclean doctrine/food could
Amen!
“And the LORD God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat: but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.”
Genesis 2:16-17 KJV
“Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?”
Genesis 3:1 KJV
Did God really say…
Why gentiles are called unclean? Because they eat unclean foods... That is why God used that vision to teach Peter that God had cleanse whatever He cleansed.. Because even those gentiles received Christ as Savior it does not stated there that after Cornelius received Christ He did not anymore ate those unclean foods... Peter preach Christ as Savior not as to stop eating unclean food.
Pharisees establish those laws that is why they persecuted the apostles... Apostles preach Christ the giver of ETERNAL LIFE.
Consider this. In Acts ch.10 just before Peter had his rooftop vision the Word says that the men sent from Cornelius were approaching his house.
Peter saw the same vision three times. Each time Peter told God that he didn't eat anything unclean. Three times God said," What God hath cleaned call thou not unlean".
The Word " hath" is past tense. When the vision concluded God told Peter that there were men at his door and to go with them.What if God's message to Peter wasn't just that he was accepting gentiles but specifically that Cornelius and his guests had already been cleansed by God through repentance and baptism by John the Baptist?
At Cornelius' house Peter didn't have to explain to them who John was or his mission they already knew. Its a days ride from Caeserea, Cornelius and his guests could have reached John at the Jordan river in one day.
If the Gentiles are not to be deemed as unclean even though the Gentiles eat unclean food, then shouldn't eating unclean food not to be deemed as unclean to the Gentiles?
Mark 7:18-19 AMPC says:
"18 And He said to them, Then are you also unintelligent and dull and without understanding? Do you not discern and see that whatever goes into a man from the outside cannot make him unhallowed or unclean,
19 Since it does not reach and enter his heart but [only his] digestive tract, and so passes on [into the place designed to receive waste]? Thus He was making and declaring all foods [ceremonially] clean [that is, [h]abolishing the ceremonial distinctions of the Levitical Law]."
Please test this. Grace and Peace to you and Glory to God in the Highest!
Shalom Reuben,
Did you watch the video?
As we state in the teaching:
Food was never mentioned as a part of the interpretation as to what God was showing him - never. Peter had not eaten ANY of these unclean animals all this time since Yeshua. Doesn't it only make sense that IF the vision was to include the cleansing of unclean animals for food that Peter would have made mention of this?
Peter was not receiving anything new, just something that was already established as true. Even when Peter explains it all to the brothers in Jerusalem as found in chapter 11:1-18, nothing is mentioned regarding food. Peter even informed the brothers of his refusal to eat the unclean animals in the vision he had from the Father.
We hope this helps to clarify this.
Blessings to you and yours.
@@119Ministries Yes, I watched the video and I loved it! It made some valid points that made me study scripture and ask questions I didn't before. From what I understand, the vision was about Gentiles and that they should not be deemed unclean. I get that. But my question is that how can the Gentiles be deemed clean if they eat unclean food? (Just taking food as an example because the Gentiles frequently ate unclean food. You say that it was not about food, but food was part of the conditions about cleanliness, correct?). Peter did not eat unclean food, this I agree. But the Gentiles ate unclean food, yet the vision mentioned them to not be called unclean. This could be the case if the ceremonial laws were meant only to the Jews. As Leviticus 11:2 NKJV states “Speak to the children of Israel, saying, ‘These are the animals which you may eat among all the animals that are on the earth:" Note it is written 'to the children of Israel". Am I missing something?
I currently am watching the Pauline Paradox series (was completing the prerequisites for ep 2 :) and I really like the videos! Keep it up!
@@behold_a_son Yes, you are missing something. First and foremost, if you are in Covenant with the Most High, then you are Israel (Read Romans 11 & Ephesians 2). Thus, Israel's instructions are your instructions. Second, the purpose of Peter's vision was to show that he was no longer to consider Gentiles unclean, in general. Peter did not associate with Gentiles by order of a Jewish decree, and not because God said so.
So, to address your specific question: God was welcoming the Gentiles into the Kingdom, warts and all. However, with the inherent expectation that they would learn His Ways and obey them. This is what Acts 15 addresses.
Acts 15:21 NKJV For Moses has had throughout many generations those who preach him in every city, being read in the synagogues every Sabbath."
Thus, without question, Gentile coverts would learn (if for some reason they didn't already know) that Yah says eating unclean meats is an abomination. Moreover, concerning Acts 10, I suspect that Cornelius (and his household) were already ahead of the game, in that they were "God Fearers", which means they were Gentiles who loved Yah and followed Torah, with the exception that the men were not circumcised.
@@sourmilkministries9445 Are you attempting to win converts to Christ or converts to Judaism? If it is to Judaism (assuming from your emphasis on the Torah) then note Peter's counsel to the Jerusalem council...."why do you try to test God by putting on the necks of Gentiles a yoke that neither we nor our ancestors have been able to bear?" Acts 15:10.
I really do hope and encourage you to point the Gentiles and young believers towards Christ as "we too have put our faith in Christ Jesus that we may be justified by faith in Christ and not by the works of the law, because by the works of the law no one will be justified. "
Gal 2:15
@@luvo_studioWith all due respect, both of your points are flawed. First of all, the Torah is the very thing that's supposed to be written on our hearts in our covenant with Christ. And, if it's not, then we don't know Him. Secondly, no one is trying to be saved by keeping the Law, as that is the "yoke" Acts 15 is addressing.
Paul as the chief apostle to the Gentiles did not require theGentiles change their diet to now eat “clean” foods. Nor were gentiles introduced to the “Feasts” the Jews celebrated. Holding these facts before us help us to understand that a wider view of Peter’s vision ought include the letting go of Old Testament dietary constructs.
And by "facts" you of course mean "baseless presuppositions"
right on feasts, But wrong on God's food laws,we do not have permission from HIM to do so, show me where He said so, I'll wait
Isn't it a contradiction that we can say laws against food were not nullified here but laws against Gentiles were?
The law "against Gentiles" was via a man-made decree. Whereas, the Laws against eating unclean meats are from God. So, there's no contradiction.
❤❤
Im a jew- if I were Peter and hungry, I would definitely choose a clean animal off the sheet and barbecue it, BUT there’s a problem, the clean animals are the sheet with unclean animals which contaminates the clean animals through contact, so being that I’ve never eaten an unclean animal or a clean animal that has been contaminated , I not only wouldn’t eat the unclean animal, I wouldn’t eat the clean , contaminated animal either-
Peter made the right call. This vision is definitely about contact-
Not food-
Peter obviously understood the laws of kashrut, and after some thought obviously understood the meaning of the vision which he explains later in the passage.
What the problem is yall?
that presents an interesting queery, because certainly lamb, goats and cows alike have been covered with unclean pests at sometime in their life, so the argument, as these are not made unholy by touching. moreover God clearly says the touching of the dead makes one ceremonially unclean but makes no such distinction from an unclean pest as the clean animal is being slaughtered or roasted. but certainly not is condemnable by anyone as you meet anything above Gods standard as a position of Holiness just as some would not even dare write God. nevertheless Baruch Ha Shem.
read chapter 10 and 11 thru so you will understand
acts was NOT talking about food,,, read it
How do you follow up with 1Tim 4:4-5 from this teaching?
Shalom,
For what it's worth, here is a link to our teaching that covers
1 Timothy 4. www.119ministries.com/teachings/video-teachings/detail/can-we-eat-all-things-1-timothy-4/
I think it’s funny the graphic image they use has a giraffe in the sheet but a giraffe is a clean animal according to Torah.
That's possibly where the the word "common" would come in to play.
All this arguing for your right to eat swine?
Revering the Almighty may have something to do with abstaining from food He knows isn’t healthy for His children.
But if this is the golden nugget you all want to be grasping when you stand before Yahweh, so be it.
The Almighty accepted Gentiles who did not observe the dietary law as his very own also.
119 if u turn it backwards is 911 angel of the bottomless pit. Peter said if u don't invert urself and like Isaiah said woe to them who seek deep....surely ur turning upside down shall be esteemed the Potter's clay. The Lord God. Peter shows us by crucifixion upside down we r upside down we need to invert convert or we will never know Jesus.
cornelius was keeping food laws
Watch on RUclips: *_Video 8: "Peter's Vision -- What Torah Keepers get WRONG!"_*
Matthew 5:17
@@brentbeatty4171 Brent, I am confused. Did you actually watch the video? I ask that because your reply _appears_ to be based on a misunderstanding of the video's title. The video affirms the dietary Laws.
@@sourmilkministries9445 I misunderstood. I will watch the video now
@@sourmilkministries9445 thank you for informing me brother. Shalom Aleichem 🙏
@@brentbeatty4171 Thank you, Brent. I can see how someone could easily get the wrong impression from the title. In fact, I actually made it a little vague on purpose, in order to draw people in from both sides of the issue. Although... maybe I made it a little too vague! Nevertheless, thanks, again, for taking the time to reply.
Shalom
Brother Randy,
Sour Milk Ministries
Joseph was told two dreams about food, from the servants of pharaoh. His interpretations had nothing to do with food either.
And just a picky detail… The giraffe pictured in the sheet was a clean animal, as it chews the cud and has split hooves.
And the voice spake unto him again the second time, What God hath cleansed, that call not thou common.
Acts 10:15
It doesn't only referring to FOOD but in all manner.
NOT TO EAT UNCLEAN FOODS AND NOT TO ASSOCIATE WITH GENTILES WERE 2 BIG ISSUES FOR JEWS DOESN'T D BIBLE OR GOD MAKES CONNECTION BETWEEN THE 2? SO THAT PETER WILL UNDERSTAND? Peter did not manifested Faith He shows Doubt. Ur illustration that use the gun to kill innocent is like Abraham was told to kill Isaac. Then why Abraham still attempted to kill his son?
Question for clarification on Peter's response when he says - "By no means, Lord; for I have never eaten anything that is COMMON or unclean.” We all know what unclean means, but what exactly is common food?
From what I've heard, "common" in the context of food is biblically clean but was made "common" due to jewish law? If that's true, it makes me wonder if there were more than just unclean animals in that vision? I'm wondering if it also included biblically clean animals but from Peter's cultural upbringing he considered those "common" and would not eat them. To me, that would only reinforce why this vision is about people NOT about food.
Anyone else have perspective on that?
Thanks for the video!
some might make the point that some animals are common that are clean because of the way they are kept, slaughtered , prepared or marketed. this may be what is meant. perhaps in this scene cattle kept with pigs, as an example.
common was as far as i can find is , Things sacrificed to idols, some jews back then would not eat these foods
It literally states it in Acts 10, Christ cleansed meat, in which the angel questioned Peter why he doesn't eat certain meats because all things are redeemed. It also was done after G-d purified the Earth with the flood and when Noah stepped off the ark. G-d spoke and said I give unto you all the four legged beast of the Earth all the fish in the sea, and all the fowl in the air for meat, for I G-d created these things and saw they are good. It wasn't until Moses when G-d was showing all these wonders to the Israelites and they still didn't follow G-d, so he gave them a written law as a curse for not following Him. Yes it states that the law is a blessing and a curse but it relates to the new testament of finding joy and worship through suffering. The Jews had to find joy and worship trough the curse. Peter was supposed to give words to Cornelius on how to be saved. Before he could get a few words out the Holy Spirit pored out from G-d and Peter and his apostles were amazed and the only thing he was led to say was be baptized, not live like a Jew or celebrate like one. We are free from the law. The Holy Spirit is what we live by. Please read 1 Timothy 4. This backs up Acts 10.
"Wasn't until Moses"....that's absolutely not true at all. You skipped over Genesis 7 where God differentiates the clean and unclean animals to Noah to be taken onto the Ark. Noah already was aware of clean and unclean animals....
...just saying.
He is referring to Genesis 9 after the flood.
With this interpretation, what do we do now with the unclean animals? What is their purpose of existence?
Scavengers/Food for non-believers/Food for other animals/Skins (leather) & pelts...
Bottom feeders
Pet your cat, throw a ball for your dog, ride a horse or else admire the beauty of God's creation. The same goes for all of the creatures created by Yeshua/God. Cats, dogs and horses were probably in Peter's vision. Or if you insist and you really want to eat your pet. God did give us free will, but YHVH is still Judge.
We have to understand that every one of God's creatures has a specific purpose(s). Some are meant for consumption (clean animals), others to clean The Creator's world(vultures to carcasses for example), some for specie population-control(sharks to eat surplus of fish, frogs to eat flies, etc.), some to care for God's awesome plants/our means of oxygen (Honey bees to pollinate, bats to bollinate, etc.), the list goes on...and as Humans, it is one of our primary duties to preserve/care for His creatures; to continue the work of Adam and Eve..to care for this planetary garden. God bless.
@Delon Duvenage I remember reading this Scripture. And, to be honest, that is sort of how this feels. Like I am being "dragged back under the Law" instead of saved by Grace. I will pray to God for His Guidance. I am done with Man's Corruption. Especially, when it becomes difficult to tell who is corrupting me. Notice, I said "difficult" not "impossible". Be Blessed My Dear Brothers and Sisters in Christ. I Pray that You Pray for Guidance in these matters as well.
I believe it is a matter of testing Peter's Faith. When God commanded Abraham to offer Isaac even it takes to kill His Son He never doubted and did it. When you say God himself toLD me to use the gun. I will use it because after all, if like Abraham and Isaac when I will shoot thegun, I know God will say STOP. Doesn't it only shew that Peter was strong enough standing and believing the Jewish Law? And doubted the power of Christ Blood to clean all things? Or doubted what God had commanded him to do? In Galatians 2:11-21, Paul scolded also Peter for staying away from gentiles.
As a Christian I take this at face value and eat what I want. You live buy the law better abide by the law
The law has not been removed as per Christ. Only the animal sacrifices. We don't need them because we have Christ!
@@combat-cozwe have been baptized into thr death of Christ, now risen and seated in Him in Christ. The laws of cleanliness is to the physical man, but we are no longer physical men but spiritual. We died to the law - the law is not done away with, it still stands to the carnal man
@@worldsmith6251 Yes! We died to the consequences of the law which is the penalty of death. The law did not die. If it did, we could murder without consequence because of the blood of Christ. Christ fulfilled the law, not abolished it. Not one jot or tittle will be removed of the moral law.
@@combat-coz the natural laws pertaining to morality still stands, but civil and cleanliness laws no longer pertain to us, for we are no more of this world: we have no kingdom in this earth, for ours is the Kingdom of God and not the Kingdom of Heacen - that is for earthly Israel.
Do you have an English captions version?
Then council of Jerusalem didn't forbid to eat unclean animals! So stop deceiving!
daro nonsense!
The source of the painting at 11:30 please.
I disagree with one of the first things you said about Abraham god really did want him to but he also stopped him to see his obedience and got can not lie nor does his words come back to him void so if he said Abraham go do that and you saying he didn’t mean that is saying he lied or was joking in a sense right or am I wrong just curious
I think YHWH can test people and doing so is not lying. As a kid, your father asks you to do something, as a test. He sees you were willing to do it, so he stops you as it might hurt you. Do you call him a liar?
Thank you for the message! This is my first time here, and I'm very new to the church, but there's something about what you say that confuses me. In my understanding, God created the earth and *all* the creatures on it for human consumption. So when did that change? What now makes an animal viable to eat? What is an "unclean" animal?
Shalom Cosmic Kal! Here are 2 other teachings that you might find interesting and I think they will answer your questions.
www.119ministries.com/teachings/video-teachings/detail/berean-bridges-the-dietary-instructions/
www.119ministries.com/teachings/video-teachings/detail/can-we-eat-all-things-1-timothy-4/
Kali, in the beginning humans didn't eat meat. Everyone was a vegetarian up until the flood. After the flood God changed man physiologically... in order to allow our body to be able to process meat. (I am pretty sure there WERE some people who ate meat before this. Ignoring God's laws... among other things... hence, the purpose of the flood. After the flood we were able to eat meat. It wasn't until Moses and the Mosaic law came that distinguished WHAT types of meat we could eat. Then with the birth, death, and resurrection of Jesus the was fulfilled. There was NO more law. In Peter's vision he saw biblically clean and unclean animals all together on the sheet. The vision was twofold 1. It was to show Peter he would be going to the gentiles to preach. 2. To show Peter it was now ok to eat other types of food/meat. Him going to the gentiles he had to have an understanding that what they were eating was ok.
My personal two cents... I believe Peter was relieved to understand this. Can you imagine the arguments he could possibly get in to due to his previous understanding of Mosaic law.? But now he knew he didn't have to worry about that because as we pray over our food and ask The Lord to bless it... it becomes clean.
Any questions plz ask.
God bless.!
wait, according to the Talmud, the serpent "entered eve?" (@9:35 in video) thats not what the bible says....hmmm.....
That’s the point, They are not supporting the Talmud...They are pointing out that many people took reservations of man the Talmud and we’re applying it as though it were a commandment of God.
Mike, I totally agree with you... satan never entered Eve... to say he did just means they are confused.... *sigh* this entire post has sooooo many people who are lost and confused and 119 doesn't help at all with their misinformation and misunderstandings and the way they interpret scripture.
@@jackmcbain3525 The teaching in this video was very clear that the Talmudic teaching that the serpent entering Eve was based on tradition and NOT the Word of God.
The _Age of Grace_ *began* with a spectacular “event” in Damascus (Acts 9: 1-18). Doesn’t it stand to reason that the _Age of Grace_ will also *end* with an equally spectacular “event” in Damascus, from where it all started, just prior to its destruction (Isaiah 17:1)?
On the road to Damascus (Acts 9:1-18), Paul saw a light and was struck blind for 3 days. He was taken to Damascus where the veil was lifted from his eyes, and the age of grace began. When Damascus will be totally destroyed and cease to be a city (Isaiah 17:1), the road leading to and out of Damascus will also be destroyed and cease to exist. This will leave us no exit road out - our only exit will be up.
This very road which led to *GRACE, WILL ALSO CEASE.* Paul knew of a time when this Age of Grace would be "complete" and "come to an end" when he stated *_“until the fullness of the Gentiles be come in”_* (Romans 11:25). This reference means that when the last member of the Body of Christ will be accounted for, this scripture will be fulfilled.
Similarly to Paul, will not the veil over our carnal eyes be lifted, when Damascus is destroyed. Will we not meet and see our Messiah spiritually in all His light and glory in the clouds?
At the end of this age of grace, it's the rapture of the Body of Christ. Is this event, (the destruction of Damascus), the trigger signaling our departure? and is this event the very first domino to fall which will topple the rest of the dominos already set in place, to usher in the tribulation and the Anti-Christ?
We, the Body, are children of the Light (Eph.5:8, Philp.2:15, 1Thess.5:5). We are the only light that is left to illuminate the world. We will be taken out of harm’s way, snatched away, caught up, to be with our Messiah. The world will no longer have light - Darkness will reign. The Anti-Christ will be introduced and Jacob’s trouble (the 7-year tribulation) will begin.
Look up, our redemption is at hand. Our Blessed Hope is about to become reality!
LET THE ABOVE SINK IN FOR A MOMENT
This is a maranatha “come soon” moment. Rejoice!
----------------------------------------------------------------
*Also to consider* - God insisted that the story about Paul's "road-to-Damascus" experience be recounted 3 times, (in the same book no less). See Acts 9:1-18, then in Acts 22:1-18 and then again in Acts 26:1-18.
THREE (3) is a very significant number to God. To my knowledge, Acts is the only book in the Bible that has the SAME STORY recounted 3 times within it.
Why would the limited pages of the Bible use up so much precious real-estate in just one book? This is not happenstance. It was intentioned by God Himself, for a specific reason.
Concerning the number 3, E.W. Bullinger so aptly notes that, ”three marks Divine completeness and perfection of testimony”
And to reaffirm how significant the number 3 truly is, also consider the story of Peter and his 3-fold vision of unclean meats, wherein God tells him to eat thereof and his 3-fold refusal to eat as God had commanded. Remember, this whole story revolves around the “unclean gentiles, made clean”. (Acts 10 & 11).
SPECIAL NOTE: We are told that after Peter’s refusal to eat of the “unclean” food (representing God cleansing the Gentiles, rendering them clean and acceptable), that this “unclean” food (Gentiles), laying upon *the 4 corners of the sheet* were all immediately *_taken away_* to heaven. This is reminiscent of the “Gentile” BODY of Christ being *_taken away_* (raptured) from *the 4 corners of the earth.* (Acts 10: 11 & 16)
----------------------------------------------------------------
*Also to consider* - Methuselah was the oldest recorded person in the whole Bible. His name in Hebrew/Aramaic prophetically means _”destruction will come”_ or _”his death shall bring”_ or something to that effect.
Damascus happens to be the oldest known inhabited city in the world. Is it possible that just as Methuselah's death was foretelling the destruction of the world in Noah’s day, that the destruction of Damascus might also be foretelling the coming destruction that God is about to bring on this present world?
AS A SIDE NOTE: The only other cities to be completely destroyed like Damascus is Sodom & Gomorrah. They became a ruinous heap (of ashes), by fire and brimstone, just like the fire and brimstone that God will rain down in (Ezk.38:22).
When the alliance of armies coming from the north, marching towards the south, for the spoils in the Golan Heights (oil & gas), they must geographically go through Damascus. God can fulfill 2 prophecies at the same time, both the destruction of Damascus (in less than 12 hours), by fire and brimstone AND the destruction of the attacking enemy armies of Gog (in less than 12 hours), also by fire and brimstone.
Scripture/God claims that “they” (and the whole world) will know that I Am God. If fire & brimstone fall from the sky, everyone will see the hand of God. If Damascus and the attacking armies (Russia, Turkey, Iran) are destroyed by a nuclear bomb (as some have suggested), then the world would not have a reason to believe God Himself intervened. Think about this!
ONLY GOD KNOWS THE END FROM THE BEGINNING.
The start of the _Age of Grace_ *began* with a spectacular "event" in Damascus. Doesn't it stand to reason that the _Age of Grace_ will *end* with an equally spectacular "event" also in Damascus, from where it all began?
*DON’T BE SHY, PLEASE LEAVE A COMMENT.*
You assume so much. Grace did not begin with Paul. Grace began when God killed an animal to clothe Adam and Eve instead of killing them. Its really too bad that you dont understand what the fullness of the gentiles is about. Or that you ignore so much of what Jesus said but take misunderstanding of of Pauls letters and using it as gospel truths. I pray that you will ask God to clearify much of this misunderstanding that you have.
@@elizabethmonroe5791- Your whole answer to me is one HUGE “assumption” about my personal theology. I NEVER claimed grace started with Paul. I stated that the “Age of Grace” started with Paul.
I don’t particularly appreciate your tone towards me. You might want to revise your approach towards others. I didn’t ram my comment down anyone’s throat. I put my comment out there for simple consideration - Nothing more, nothing less.
@@Norman.Labelle I wasnt being mean. Jesus warned over and over and over again that many will come in his name saying he us the christ but will deceive many. Peter warns in his apistles of misunderstanding Pauls writing. We are all human. I worry and pray all the time to not be deceived. I think in the end times we all should pray that prayer.
That is interesting, you did not talk about Genesis 9:3, Romans 14:20, Colossians 2:16, Romans 14:2, 1 Corinthians 8:8, Romans 14:3,
Gen 9...yes,Yah saved the unclean animals on the ark.
They aren’t sinful animals, simply unclean and not healthy for us to consume.
unclean animals are NOT referred to as food or meat , always referred to as flesh
@@lcozart5047
I don't disagree, but Paul later confronts him about eating with the Gentiles one way and later with the Jews, another, doesnt he?
..as I am viewing this teaching 3 years after it was placed on RUclips, I am curious as to what happened to this presenter.
All the confused people ate him, ha ha
somebody needs to read Hebrews 11 :17-19 Issacs was goner , even rabbi believe that he put him to death
@119Ministies "There you have it. All things are indeed now clean for food" is declared by the Word of God starting with Acts 10, but not ending there. You are in error and not fully interpreting Acts 10. Can not a bible passage have more than one meaning? Yes it can and does. Here's an example....Revelation 13:3: "And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast." In Revelation 13:3, the deadly wound of the Antichrist has two meanings: (1) a revival of the Roman Empire and (2) his actual deadly physcial wound will be healed. Keep in mind the Antichrist will mock Christ such as healing the sick and mocking the Resurrection of Christ. Being healed of a deadly wound mocks Christ's resurrection.
So what about Acts 10? It has more than one meaning. Acts 10:10-15: "(10) And he became very hungry, and would have eaten: but while they made ready, he fell into a trance, (11) And saw heaven opened, and a certain vessel descending upon him, as it had been a great sheet knit at the four corners, and let down to the earth: (12) Wherin were all manner of fourfooted beasts of the earth, and wild beasts, and creeping things, and fowls of the air. (13) And there came a voice to him, Rise, Peter; kill, and eat. (14) But Peter said, Not so, Lord; for I have never eaten any thing that is common or unclean. (15) And the voice spake unto him again the second time, What God hath cleansed, that call not thou common. (16) This was done thrice: and the vessel was received up again into heaven."
The 1st meaning is about God wanting Peter to witness to Gentiles which is the only meaning you see. The 2nd meaning does indeed include eating unclean animals since the vision included them. That's the part you and too many others are missing. If a person accepts Christ as Lord and Savior, then they are cleansed by God. Also if a person prays over their food, with thanksgiving, then the food is cleansed by God, including so called unclean meats. 1 Timothy 4:1-5: "(1) Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils; (2) Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their conscience seared with a hot iron; (3) Forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from meats, which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving of them which believe and know the truth. (4) For every creature of God is good, and nothing to be refused, if it be received with thanksgiving: (5) For it is sanctified by the word of God and prayer."
Now in 1 Timothy 1-5, this passage is warning against giving heed to seducing spirits and doctrines of demons. Part of this warning is commanding others to abstain from meats. Now please re-read 1 Timothy 4:4 again where it clearly and emphatically states that every creature, icluding unclean animals, is good and not to be refused if received with thanksgiving. So yes not only did Christ change the dietary habits once after the flood, but here He did it again. If a person prays over their food, then it's cleansed by God. This is a passage which in part compliments Acts 10. There you go the Word has declared every creature good. I pray thee, please stop going against the Word of God and ask Him to give you complete understanding of His Word. Stop leading people astray.
Why would Yah want us to eat meat that comes from animals that clean up the filth of the earth and sea? Why would Yah have Peter break His law? Why would Yah go against His command? Isn’t He the same yesterday, today and forevermore?
@@amyw4125 Yes God is the same yesterday, today, and forever. You are misinterpreting that here. God is the same in nature and person always. It doesn't mean He won't change certain things when He sees fit to correct mankind when we are in error. Correct me if I am wrong, didn't God change the diet for man the 1st time after the flood? Genesis 9:3: "Every moving thing that liveth shall be meat for you; even as the green herb have I given you all things." Based upon your misinterpretation, we are to ignore this passage and just eat fruit and veggies like mankind did b4 the flood.
So yes God did declare certain animals unclean. Yet He changed things yet again, starting with Acts 10 and yet complimenting it with 1 Timothy 4:3-5: "(3) Forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from meats, which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving of them which believe and know the truth. (4) For every creature of God is good, and nothing to be refused, if it be received with thanksgiving: (5) For it is sanctified by the word of God and prayer."
Now I will be praying for you because you are not debating with me but Yah Himself which is a problem. It clearly states in 1 Timothy 4:4 that every creature of God is good and not to be refused if received with thanksgiving. Are not all creatures including the unclean created by Yah? All things are possible with God. To make the proper and full interpretation of Acts 10 goes like this....Whoever accepts Christ as Lord and Savior, including Gentiles, have been cleansed and sanctified by Yah. Also whoever eats any meat, including unclean, and pray over it with thanksgiving, that food has been cleansed and sanctified by Yah. If Yah has the power to cleanse sinners, then He would certainly have the power to cleanse unclean food if we ask Him. If you don't believe that then I feel sorry you. Like I said I will be praying for you.
Am i right in thinking, that you are saying that as long as unclean food like pork is prayed over before eating, then that Pork becames a clean Meat?
@@justtruth5855 Yes you can say that, but I rather you focus on the Word of God which says that just read 1 Timothy 4:1-5 which explains it.
Illuminati S.R the word of Yahuah says not to eat unclean animals. How can the swine become clean? It has no sweat glands so every thing it has eaten you will eat. It is pumped with chemicals and they have put the DNA of the RAT in the pig so that it grows faster. i am pretty sure there will be videos on youtube with people pouring coca cola over raw bacon. There is even scriptor saying that this would happen with the pig and the rat. As for the word god is that not Baal by another name?.
Peter was a jew in nature and he had a problem with uncleaned animals so it was Peters preference not to eat uncleaned animals
noel nadasan Jesus is a Jew, he did not sin so did not eat anything unclean. We are to walk, eat, as he did
Where in the bible does it say that.?
@@TheCindermonkee Jesus fulfilled the old law.... finished it... there is NO old law now... by saying (Mark 7:19) Because it entereth not into his heart, but into the belly, and goeth out into the draught, purging all meats - Jesus declared all foods clean. We can eat what we wish... we only have to pray over our food and ask The Lord to bless it and it is clean.
Plz read 1 Timothy 4:1-5 it reaffirms this as well... AND speaks about false doctrine.
1TIMOTHY 4
Very interesting that you have 144k subs, lol.
Indonesian subtitled please.
We don't have any teachings in Indonesian; however, if you would like to volunteer to help with translations, please contact us here: info@119ministries.com
No Where in the Bible does it say that the serpent entered Eve.
Why put such Credence on the talmud-oral tradition? Didn't Yeshua say something about tradition? In Mt.15:
So for the sake of your tradition you have made void the word of God.7 You hypocrites! Well did Isaiah prophesy of you, when he said:
8 “‘This people honors me with their lips,
but their heart is far from me;
9 in vain do they worship me,
teaching as doctrines the commandments of men.’”
That was actually the vert same point made in the video.
You are lying as Peter eat unclean animals in antioch. This is why Paul told him off that he eats himself but teaches other not to eat!
daro you misunderstand, that’s not what went on there.
^^ yes it was
unclean animals are NOT referred to as food or meat , always referred to as flesh
Number one Peter was in a "TRANCE" because of hunger like Jesus was when He was tempted by Satan at a "weak point" after 40 days and 40 nights. When you are in a "TRANCE " Mediums communicate with humans. It was in fact a demon attempting to stray Peter from Gods Word. The scripture said " A Voice" spoke to Peter, not God or the voice of God. You should question why God would say "Do not call anything impure that God has made clean.” When it is God that is speaking.
?
@@gregc5671 Pray in Holy Spirit and study deeper or you will always questions.
@@gregc5671 l know...you follow the other sheep and don't think for yourself.. Yeshua bless you 🙏🏾
The Father says this because, if you read the chapter in context, He is clearly referencing the Gentiles… read the rest of the chapter and see the Spirit, through divine intervention, brought Cornelius to Peter for a meeting… Peter even *explains* the vision in the very same chapter…
This doesn’t make sense. If you look at the Greek, it makes no mention nor implication it’s an unclean spirit.
@2:57 is not how Abraham or Isaac looked lol. That mean that the Israelites would be white…
Abraham and Isaac Were Israelites Which Mean They Look Like Yahawahshi Who The World Ignorantly Calls Jesus. Revelation 1:14 ???
Which part of this video is your comment in reference to?
@@gregc5671 @2:57 is not how Abraham or Isaac looked lol. That mean that the Israelites would be white…
Most of the Gentiles spoke Greek at the time. That's why Christians say Jesus. Remember, it was Peter who gave the Gentiles the name Christians. You can see the distancing from the traditional Judaism even when Christ walked on Earth. He changed Simon a common Jewish name to Peter. Later Saul another common Jewish name to Paul.
I'm going to make me bacon stuffed pork loin. mmm
I believe it's safe to say that's not the only abomination you have towards God ?
Nsw
You're really good at philosophy. I mean pretty good. I see you're going to ignore the context and make it entirely about verse 28. WOW. I don't think there's any words that will help.
The idea that this has nothing to do with food shoots itself in the foot. For if the illustration is false (meaning if all those unclean animals were not, in fact, now clean), then neither is the meaning behind the symbol. It's really a both/and: The formerly unclean animals are no longer to be called unclean, for He has MADE them clean. In the same way, Gentiles were no longer to be considered unclean by Jews, for God was making them clean by the same faith.
The blind do not need YOU for a teacher, you have clearly not studied on the subject you are trying to teach about. all you need to do is read all of acts 10 and 11 the answer is there plain as day
@@bmurp1201 Yeah...they...uh...actually do. And I have studied it. I'm right. Move along, now.
@@markomus1 your arrogance testifies against you, professing yourself as wise you became a Fool
You could parallel the vision to animals. A common animal is a clean animal that is living among unclean animals. ie: a goat living among a pig, the goat is okay to eat but not the pig. The vision was about man not animals.
@@bmurp1201 I could say the same about you. Now move along, little fella.
This video and its argumentation is absurd on so many levels. "Rise and shoot" is being compared to "Rise and eat". Are you freaking serious? Your reward will be just.
funny how the ones with the least knowledge are always first to attack
@@bmurp1201 Do you think the video's comparison to "rise and shoot someone" with "rise and eat" is equivalent? Since you have more knowledge, please explain.
if you have read the text, it states that before peter fell into the ,trance , vision which i think is a better term ,he was very hungry, which when woke, God immediately says rise peter kill and eat, he misconstrued what God was saying because he Was hungry, we have to consider several scriptures to find that peter had started on his journey that day ,to fulfil what Jesus had prophesied to him concerning the work he had to do ,in just 1 instance among many he was told ,thou art peter and upon this rock i will build my church and the gates of hell will not prevail ,etc. if you notice peter had a hard time including the gentiles in his ministry ,anyway to give the answer you asked ,it looks as if God was teaching peter several things in the statement , rise and eat, God was saying,for peter to use the gospel which we find represented by the sheet let down 3 times ,showing that peter was to preach the Gospel to All .not just Jews, peter called them common And unclean that was peters perspective on them to kill in this instance ,meant for peter to teach them the difference between ,The Holy and Profane in romans 6 is a good bit of knowlege on that, i thank you for your ? if this does not answer your inquiry enough i will gladly give it more effo
rt @@goldenarm2118
@@bmurp1201 Thank you for your reply. You say that Peter misconstrued what God was saying because Peter was hungry. Peter didn't misconstrue what God was saying. He didn't know, at the beginning, what God was saying. He was confused because God had given him a command that went against the dietary laws of the Old Covenant. Peter eventually figured out that vision was to teach him that Gentiles were included in God's redemption and salvation. The question is why did God give a command to Peter that went against the dietary laws he commanded in the Old Testament. It seems at odds with God to teach Peter that Gentiles were included in the gospel by commanding Peter to break the law.
misunderstood, misconstrued ,to interpret (something, such as a statement or action) wrongly, i think it was close enough, to understand ,peter did think on the vision later he said as much, God used those words with purpose , kill and eat ; was a term used for , devouring sinful flesh and evil religions, this was further understood by the sheet let down knit on 4 corners , also search on things Jesus said to peter, some sayings were ,if you love me Feed my sheep , I have sheep of another fold, one reason for the vision rebuke because when Jews were around peter would hide the fact that he was keeping company w the gentiles,, hope this helps,, God bless
@@goldenarm2118
Lol I feel like there's an underlying bit of scoffing from this man. I too get frustrated when I talk to Christians about food and they mention Peter's vision. So I don't blame this teacher lol
i am unsure of your position on this.
probably double minded looks like
@@John_Mcgrane
You're interpretation is clearly wrong because not only the Gentiles were cleansed, the Dietary Laws are now done away by Christ Jesus' Atonement on the cross!
Let's take a look at the Apostle Peter's vision:
Acts 10:9-16 KJV
On the morrow, as they went on their journey, and drew nigh unto the city, Peter went up upon the housetop to pray about the sixth hour: [10] And he became very hungry, and would have eaten: but while they made ready, he fell into a trance, [11] And saw heaven opened, and a certain vessel descending unto him, as it had been a great sheet knit at the four corners, and let down to the earth: [12] Wherein were all manner of fourfooted beasts of the earth, and wild beasts, and creeping things, and fowls of the air. [13] And there came a voice to him, Rise, Peter; kill, and eat. [14] But Peter said, Not so, Lord; for I have never eaten any thing that is common or unclean. [15] And the voice spake unto him again the second time, What God hath cleansed, that call not thou common. [16] This was done thrice: and the vessel was received up again into heaven.
This was done 3 times to confirm the matter, the same way Christ Jesus spoke with Peter on different occasions. Read in the Gospels.
Peter journeyed with these uncircumcised men why? Who told him to go with them?
Acts 10:17-20 KJV
Now while Peter doubted in himself what this vision which he had seen should mean, behold, the men which were sent from Cornelius had made enquiry for Simon's house, and stood before the gate, [18] And called, and asked whether Simon, which was surnamed Peter, were lodged there. [19] 👉While Peter thought on the vision, the Spirit said unto him, Behold, three men seek thee. [20] Arise therefore, and get thee down, and go with them, doubting nothing: for I have sent them.👈
After this, read the next chapter to see those opposed to what the Spirit of God told Peter to do!
Acts 11:1-18 KJV
And the apostles and brethren that were in Judaea heard that the Gentiles had also received the word of God. [2] And when Peter was come up to Jerusalem, *they that were of the circumcision contended with him,* [3] *Saying, Thou wentest in to men uncircumcised, and didst eat with them.* (Peter ATE WITH THEM!)
Continue reading:
[4] But Peter rehearsed the matter from the beginning, and expounded it by order unto them, saying, [5] I was in the city of Joppa praying: and in a trance I saw a vision, A certain vessel descend, as it had been a great sheet, let down from heaven by four corners; and it came even to me: [6] Upon the which when I had fastened mine eyes, I considered, and saw fourfooted beasts of the earth, and wild beasts, and creeping things, and fowls of the air. [7] And I heard a voice saying unto me, Arise, Peter; slay and eat. [8] But I said, Not so, Lord: for nothing common or unclean hath at any time entered into my mouth. [9] But the voice answered me again from heaven, What God hath cleansed, that call not thou common. [10] And this was done three times: and all were drawn up again into heaven. [11] And, behold, immediately there were three men already come unto the house where I was, sent from Caesarea unto me. [12] *And the Spirit bade me go with them, nothing doubting. Moreover these six brethren accompanied me, and we entered into the man's house:* [13] *And he shewed us how he had seen an angel in his house, which stood and said unto him, Send men to Joppa, and call for Simon, whose surname is Peter;* [14] Who shall tell thee words, whereby thou and all thy house shall be saved. [15] And as I began to speak, the Holy Ghost fell on them, as on us at the beginning. [16] Then remembered I the word of the Lord, how that he said, John indeed baptized with water; but ye shall be baptized with the Holy Ghost. [17] Forasmuch then as God gave them the like gift as he did unto us, who believed on the Lord Jesus Christ; what was I, that I could withstand God? [18] When they heard these things, they held their peace, and glorified God, saying, Then hath God also to the Gentiles granted repentance unto life.
Your video is incorrect and has legalistic opinions in it.
built4speed101 - May Yeshuah open your eyes and your understanding of his word.
Romans 1 18, Jeremiah 17 9, Colossians 2 8, Romans 1 18
Yeshua never ate a pagan ham on pagan easter! John 4 24
1 Thessalonians 5 21
@@brentbeatty4171 your misleading context,context,context
built4speed101 you complicate the vision clearly you are heart desires your own pleasure that makes you blind and stubborn to understand the vision clearly. Please remove that ego and understand the vision top to bottom.
The man in this video is using poor illustrations to try and make the scripture mean something else, when it’s plain and simple in the text
You completely ignore the Lord’s words - words He spoke- does He not mean ALL that He speaks? You mention that Peter went on to practice the law and abide under the food laws - yet it is also said that he was accursed for doing so.....
If we could earn our own salvation what would be the need for a Savior. And can what God says and shows not have a double meaning not contradictory to one another? Why ONLY does this pertain to gentiles and not to the food shown itself. I feel you are heavily leading people astray and putting them under a law that Jesus fulfilled... that the Lord God Himself spoke and said had been made clean.
So what of the other 613 commandments - you mean to tell me you do and follow each of those in perfect fulfillment ?!! NONSENSE! WE COULD NOT FULFILL THE LAW, it is why Jesus was sent to die for the sins of the world. You are cursed by the law of which you command others keep- for if you break but one you’ve broken them all.
So please tell me you do not wear clothes mixed of two different threads- that you do not wear linen and wool blends? Polyester blends? Get out of here with that .... seriously. Just about every piece of clothing made in modern day is mixed threads. Suppose we should all start walking around naked as to not break God’s law...
Many will use homosexuality to draw a parallel in the law but homosexuality is also spoken against in the NT. However, I can see no evidence of the same in regards to food, especially when I see the spoken words of God “what I have made clean”...
So because we discredit those words to pertain to Gentiles only and not both the animals and their consumers... what else has God said that we may dismiss as mere illustration!
Is not the word of God perfect ? Is not His word breathed into life ? Does His word not give life? Why if He did not mean it would He have spoke it?! I’m really struggling to dismiss the words of God as merely illustration with no other meaning but for an illustrative purpose - is our God not greater than that ? Is His word not TRUTH in all ways? Or only partially?!
Thank God Almighty for His abounding grace that sinners such as myself who take His words to be finite truth can see such meaning and know that He knows my heart above all else ♥️
Your Deceive. I think your in a belief of "Once Save always save"
You make TMH out to be a bipolar God. Why would he create unclean animals in the beginning, say they are unclean and to not eat them, distinguish them from clean, then turn around and say it's now ok to eat what I deemed unclean. I adjure you to study on that Hebrew word unclean, then study the reason unclean animals were created. Then it will be very clear why He said they were unclean and why we are not to eat the unclean. I've come to learn when we cross up TMH word, we lack clear understanding of Him and his word. That's why scripture says to study to show thyself approved(acceptable/pleasing) unto Yahuah, a workman need not be ashamed, RIGHTLY dividing (to make straight/correctly) the word of truth.
Brenda Wilson that’s pretty flawed thinking - that’s like saying why would God ever require sacrifice for sin from the beginning if He was always going to send Jesus to Earth to atone for the sins of the world. 🤦🏼♀️ Fallacious.
Larsen Alexanders I don’t believe in once saved always saved nor did I ever say that - but I believe you must have faith in Jesus Christ above all things... if you could get to Heaven off your own merit, good works and fulfillment of the law what would ever be the need of a Savior?!!
@@jackieg4911
You don't understand.
You do Good works because you are save.
You do not do Good work to be Saved.
Good teaching, but not correct. Not only were the gentiles no longer unclean, but the food as well. It covers all.
Shalom! Here is a link to another teaching that you may find interesting. www.119ministries.com/teachings/video-teachings/detail/can-we-eat-all-things-1-timothy-4/
No Where in the Bible does I say that the serpent entered Eve?
V28 sums it up. Read the context not just 1 cherry picked verse
unclean animals are NOT referred to as food or meat , always referred to as flesh