Footage of Russian Tu 22M3 Bomber crashing in Olenegorsk | Aviation Club
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 27 янв 2019
- A Tupolev Tu-22M3 supersonic strike bomber has crashed in Russia's northwestern region of Murmansk.
The accident occurred at 1:40 p.m. (5:40 a.m. ET) as the long-range bomber was attempting to land, according to Russian state news agency TASS, citing law enforcement officials.
The warplane had four crew members onboard: the commander, co-pilot, navigator and operator.
Two crew members have died and two have survived, according to law enforcement officials, TASS reported.
I find it amazing that anyone would want to stand in the arctic cold and fog to try to film planes landing. Yet this dude got the footage of a lifetime! RIP
Nothing surprising. Military airfield. there are always people who are obliged to do what they order. It is a pity that they did not order themselves and the pilot to think about the risk of such a dangerous landing in a snowstorm.
Except he didn't catch the wings and rear of the aircraft actually taking off again while on fire as the nose rolls along the ground. Great filming outside of that little detail we missed.
I've stood out in quite cold and windy conditions to photograph aircraft....but the lowest I've been out is like 29 degrees F, this looks ridiculously colder than that
It doesn’t look real? Surely there would be more fuel on fire?
Also why didn’t he run over to save the pilot?
@@d.tim1989 he's not equiped to do so, and actually going straight to a plane that crashed with burning fuel is total suicide, unless you're a trained firefighter.
That impact on the runway didn't break the landing gear, it broke the whole plane.
@@davesnothere.. Overrated joke
@@MoskusMoskiferus1611 Still a good one!
@@MoskusMoskiferus1611 The fact you said overrated joke instead of overused joke, tells me everything I need to know about you Ivan.
@@davesnothere. retarded why don't you try to land a bomber in the middle of a snow storm.
The Russians are famous in the world for the production of extremely durable landing gears for military planes. Didn't you know about it?
They're still working on the airframes... 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Badly cleared runway (white), in fog (white) - visual assessment impossible at high speed. Damaged radio altimeter, poorly calibrated barometric altimeter. Typical Russian sloppiness. Results on the movie.
It’s amazing 2 of the 4 crew survived.
Actually, only one crew member survived the crash.
The third died later.
☮
@@McRocket RIP
I actually thought all four had a chance since the cockpit section broke away from the flaming wreckage.
@@Valisk Okaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay.
I am just going to slowly back out of the room...while I smile and nod at you.
Bye now.
☮
@@McRocket Don't mind him, he suffer already from watching ukraine gets obliterated.
I am a commercial pilot and flight instructor. That appears to me to be a classic example of an accelerated stall. For some unknown reason, the pilot allowed the descent rate to become way too high, before he applied power and pulled up, but it was too late. The excessive angle of attack in the pull-up resulted in an accelerated aerodynamic stall, and the descent rate was not substantially reduced. Thus, the impact with the ground was way more that the aircraft could sustain and it came apart. The only thing that could have prevented the accident was for the pilot to realize that the descent rate was rapidly increasing and apply go-around power immediately. His instruments would have shown him the increase in the rate of descent in time to save it. One pilot stays on the instruments and the other pilot watches for the ground to appear. Then, the pilot transitions from the instruments to a visual landing. The pilot appears to have tried to transition too soon.
I think the pilot reacted too late. The moment seemed to arrive way before the pilot was ready. That wasn't even close to a proper landing position or speed.. I guess I just don't understand what's going on here fully. No lights during a blizzard.? Why?. Was there no available ILS glide slope to bring them in at the proper angle? That high angle of decent also robbed the aircraft of much needed speed reduction as it was coming it way too fast... Tragedy was set the moment that pilot decided to make a terrible approach work. Whether they were low on fuel or just being lazy. With a runway like that, there is no making any landing working at that speed. What were they going to do, skate to a stop?
Добавь к этому особенность полосы(горбатая) в Оленегорске.
Russell Macdonald: It does not appear to be an accelerated stall to me. I see no evidence in the video of a pull up. It seems to me to just be an excessive sink rate. FYI: I am a recently retired major airline pilot with over 35 years of experience and close to 24,000 flight hours. I am also a former B-52 pilot.
Thank you for a learned response.
Lol, I understood less than 50%
Video starts at 1:22
No, the video starts at 0:00
Thanks Zee, after 30 seconds I thought I had accidently hit a 'white noise snow storm' video. I scrolled down hoping someone would make a 'video starts' comment.
O avião simplesmente se partiu ao meio, que loucura!
E não podemos deixar de ressaltar o profissionalismo do câmera, filmou o acidente do começo ao fim, sem desviar o foco.
Horrific crash. But magnificent filming. Other clips on RUclips always amaze me when the cameraman quickly turns the camera away when something like a crash takes place.
While usually repeating the words, "OH MY GOD, OH MY GOD....!"
But this is Russia...they are used to crazy schtuff happening.
@@THE-BUNKEN-DRUM100s of times.
Videographers in Russia don't fuck around.
It's absolutely wrong. When it comes to something like that always keep filming as video footage will be extremely valuable source of data for people who will be investigating the accident.
The two surviving crew members are now Ryanair pilots.
🤣🤣🤣🤣
and when is your last hour?
They had a choice...
Aerosucre!
Have you even flown with Ryanair?
@@ozzy8286 no
Holy shit that's scary, he was coming in waaaaaay too fast and steep.
Agreed. Looks like the hard landing snapped the plane in two.
@@APOTwixx This was probably lucky as the cockpit may have survived a bit, then again G forces and flames not good.but it did travel away from fuel. Did pilot live?
@@plasmaburndeath two out of four died immediately, the third later in hospital. Just one survivor. Landing in a blizzard...RIP
Not the most favorable conditions either! I was looking at those little light coming and and thinking "... That's not landing worthy!"
@@asmuslinn4507 no rip they were Orcs
That was intense.
А по моему , так каждая посадка должна фиксироваться на видео !
Это во многом поможет вот в таких случаях понять причину аварии !
Я три раза пересмотрел, но причину не понял
@@littlerussianmax5831
А большую вертикальную скорость снижения не заметил ?!
Слишком быстрое снижение с последующей попыткой уйти на второй круг.
@@user-oh2kt8lf6g
Где ты увидел попытку ?! 😯😯😯
@@littlerussianmax5831 пилот нажрался водки и решил что он бессмертный.
Horrific conditions. Plane broke right apart.
oh you noticed...
Russia's industrial level is very low, and Russians are also careless!
@@user-bj1id4tp3i you just confirmed you know nothing about Russians. and Russian industrial level. period.
Action starts around 1:24
Excellent video
Lots of technical comments here: I’m just wondering how deep was the snow on the runway? Looks to me as if rear undercarriage dug in then bounced back up so tail hit the ground, with the sudden uplift fracturing the body. RIP.
Seeing a bomber split in half on landing was not something I expected to see today. RIP
We expect it if it is Russian technology. It happened to the Concordsky also.
@@nightman7263 retard what about US F117 stealth jet tearing into pieces during take off??....and the weather was absolutely fine.
You don't know what you're talking about, do that on an American bomber the same thing would happen. I don't want to be a nerd but a landing hard like that will cause hull ruptures.@@nightman7263
facts@@mcbmcb5163
@mcbmcb5163 what's the ratio of Americans planes obliterating for no reason versus Russian? Russian aircraft seem to have a much higher failure rate. Us aircraft usually fail due to pilot error
As I watched the forward fuselage roll down the runway I briefly thought the 4 crew might survive it but then the remains of the aircraft came right down on it.
RIP.
2 of the four crew were killed on impact and a third died on the way to the hospital. Never seen anything like that.
I have several thousand hours as a multi engine IFR rated pilot, flying primarily the Falcon 900 EX. Based on this video and what I see, this was a nightmare approach given the conditions. Almost zero visibility, fast airspeed on approach due to type of aircraft and a runway totally obscured in snow. Yes, a go around was the obvious choice but decisions had to be made well before DH. At 150 mph., my guess on airspeed during approach, you have but a few seconds to react and you are at the mercy of sink rate and potentially other factors such as surrounding terrain, fuel remaining and the complexity of a published missed approach.
In one regard, not many pilots ( myself included ) would dare make this landing. In another regard, the decision to seek a viable alternative airport should have been made half way through the flight based on conditions. That is, of course, if Russia has competent ATC and weather reporting.
Возможно что уход на запасной аэродром не был из-за отсутствия достаточного количества топлива.
Смешной комментатор, про компетенции в России рассказывает, в России, где авиация производится полным циклом, от научных исследований до производства двигателей и обучения летного состава.
If you have to make the decision before Decision Height, then there's no reason for having one.
You are the pilot, you control the sink rate. If you are at the mercy of sink rate, then get a ground job.
The complexity of the missed approach is usually less destructive than a crash landing.
It is obvious the pilot saw the runway and discontinued reliance on his instruments, ducking under and exceeding the sink rate.
It sounds like the engines kept running awhile after the fuselage hit the ground.
The turbine is spinning at 20000 rpm. It would definitely continue to spin although that’s inertia driven as there’d be no fuel available.
The Fuel pumps are in the engines, the throttles are set by servo, once power is lost to the servo it freezes in place or falls to idle speed. So the engines can run on the fuel that is remaining in the fuel lines or connected tanks. I imagine 60 feet of 3 inch line holds a few seconds worth of fuel.
Given how long before impact we could hear the plane approaching, it's possible another plane was on approach.
Я тогда в телеком конторе водителем работал, в тот день ездил между Снежногорск-Полярный-Гаджиево и слышал как самолеты в этом районе летали, может даже конкретно этот. Так вот, погода в тот день настолько ужасная была с сильным снегом что даже на машине дорогу тяжело было разглядеть. Непонятно, как можно было одобрить вылет самолета в такую погоду, а затем еще и посадку?
Хуй с ними
А если война?
Военный летчик должен уметь летать в любых погодных условиях.
@@operative-divisionпогода не летная, все сидят на земле.
@@josephastier7421нет, в любых погодных условиях пока что ещё не научились.
2:48 IMO, had the suspension collapsed on impact the fuselage may have survived. Unfortunately the wheel suspension was much stronger than cantilevered fuselage
теперь заходим на ролик где катастрофа американского самолета и заголовок на русском и читаем русскоязычные комменты. Сравниваем с теми ,что тут и понимаем скрепы и духовность
бандеровским защеканам этого не понять
Russian bot
In those atrocious conditions I'm not surprised the accident occurred. There seems to be no visual reference whatsoever. I wonder what the decision height was because the engines appear to spool up just before the accident as though the pilot saw the ground far too late for a go around to be successful. If it was a 'modern' aeroplane I should have thought auto land would have been the order of the day. Obviously not. I don't think an accelerated stall was the problem - more a high sink rate (with no flare) and an (apparent) very high approach speed (but that may just be due to perspective and the like). (ATPL/FI/FE)
The spectators could see the lights of the aircraft, but maybe the pilots couldn‘t see anything and were finally surprised by the closeness of the runway. And we don‘t know, under what technical circumstances they were flying. But what do I know... I was surprised how calm the filmer and his mate stood during and after this heavy accident.
The technical circumstances was, they were trying to land in zero visibility. Even a brand-new $200 million commercial airliner with 2023 modern electronic doodads would've waved off this landing and went to an alternate airport. This was a crude airplane in comparison, a Soviet bomber built in the 1980s. Probably didn't even have a radio altimeter.
We know the exact moment they saw the runway - It's when we hear the engines rapidly spooling up.
@mihailyv It's very typical for an average Jo in the West to think that way about Russia. Most of them still do not know that all those things were Russian : first satellite, first man in space, first nuclear plant, first supersonic passenger jet.
As well as being true pioneers in high window aviation.
you are in no way remotely qualified in any way to give an analysis yet her you are thinking your input is worthy of attention and consideration. Remind us of those many years you spent on the FAA investigation review boards? Tell us about the books you've authored on teh subject. Tell us about all those years you personally spent in the Russian air force working with their crash investigators... go ahead we'll wait. In the meantime maybe let the adults do the work here you go play somewhere
Wow! Looks like the plane was coming in way too fast. 😕
It doesn't ever appear that the nose gear touched down at all!
I think the AoA at touchdown was very, very high. There might have been a tail strike, it's hard to see but the top of the vertical stabilizer appears to collapse at touchdown. The vertical stabilizer is not highly stressed in that direction, so that failure suggests the tail hit well before the main gear. It's also possible the stress from the tailstrike initiated a buckling (compression) collapse along the top of the aircraft, and then when the main gear hit the buckled airframe broke apart under newly applied tension.
Looked like was coming in fast and steep.
I like that newly applied tension !! Pretty sure I have had that ! Good one - thanks
To me this looked like a classic “white out” condition. There was not enough visibility to judge the flair. Unknown is the runway lighting and/or visual aids.
The thick fog is not suitable for flying into. He may have not realized he was descending too fast. And then like another commenter said the plane may have been in a stall.
I doubt that really matters, the problem wasn't him not seeing the ground, it seems that he ignored clear indications that his instruments should have given him, that his approach was wrong. Maybe the humidty and low temperature caused ice to build up around some sensor, thus giving him wrong numbers on his instruments?
Or it was good old hubris. A short time ago, a commercial plane crashed in Katmandu (I think), cause the pilot missed the point where he should go into a controlled, slow descent and instead of performing a go-around, he decided to nosedive towards the runway, causing the plane to exceed landing speed... and just for good measure, that worthless asshole of a captain seems to have forgotten to put down the landing gear as a cherry on top. The plane scraped the runway, lost both engines and in the inevitable go-around stalled and crashed into the city.
@@muffs55mercury61,
You never see the snow covered runway, soon enough !
Why not do a low pass and look at runway first then come back in or go somewhere else.
В последний момент пилоты поняли, что идут ниже глиссады и скорость снижения очень высокая. Слышно как включили двигатели на всю, но не успели моторы вытащить его, да и места для манёвра уже не было.
Если снимали из окон КП, то это примерно середина ВПП, значит он шел выше глиссады и давно перетел точку касания, потому с увеличенной вертикальной скоростью опускался для быстрейшего касания полосы. (два года провел на КП аэродрома с СУ-24, видел сотни посадок, но никогда в такую погоду).
Да, очевидно, что старался успеть... Но, блин, что мешает вовремя понять неоправданность риска, и уйти на второй круг вовремя? При такой погоде лучше лишнего дать, чем вот так ( На гражданке премий лишают за лишние телодвижения и топливо, а в военке тоже что ли? Условия жуткие, огней на полосе нет...@@raimondaszujus1052
я не знаю минимума самолета, но погода для тренированных приемлемая, просто военные в такую погоду не летают, вот и навыка нет.@@raimondaszujus1052
textbook definition of *comin' in hot!*
I am not a pilot but is it possible that (cause of heavy snowing and frost) the front landing gear has got a hard stop on the runway when at that exact moment (cause of delay in acceleration) the jets went full power, bending the frame and breaking it?
Looks to me like the front gear was far too strong or the plane was too heavy with load or fuel. Or both of it (strong front gear and overloading) happened. The approach was aggresive but in ideal circumstances could pass without breaking the frame.
the plane splitting like that reminded me of the remote controlled plane that was crashed for sciencw
Assuming a short sound delay due to the distance, it seems the pilot began to go to full power the moment he saw the ground or trees outside his window.
Worrying; were they relying on visual, or on a ground-proximity alarm to tell them how high they were? A simple rate-of-descent mistake while relying on either of those would mean this was near-inevitable.
That plane broke in half, the nose tumbled, the rear half seems to have climbed up then fallen back as it tumbled, with engines still going full power.
A terrible business, and it didn't look survivable. I hope it wasn't demands of superior officers, or overconfidence that led to this incident, but that's an expensive result: several lives and a hard-to-replace aircraft.
From what I’ve read elsewhere, 2 of the 4 people onboard survived the crash itself, one of them later dying in hospital. I do not have a source for this though.
think the approach speed was a bit on the high side, but other than that, not bad
Double trouble, high rate of descent and Vref. Structural fatigue may have been a factor also.
When you think it's gonna slam into the ground but it splits in half instead?!?
Russian engineering at its finest
😂😂😂😂😂
Shoigu needed a swimming pool for his new dacha.
What happens? Finish your sentence.
Perfect flying weather
. Flying scheduled Cargo in a single engine, turbo prop, we have our days of low. visibility approaches with snow, low ceilings, icing conditions, slogged up runways.
@@williamcope2652,
Good luck and the best wishes....
And this was Yuri's introduction to IFR landings.
I can imagine all the naval aviators thinking, "Yeah, normal approach for an F-18."
Those navy pilots also have Auto-throttles, and automatic carrier landing systems.
I think people are forgetting that this was is very snowing conditions and it was also precipitating (you can hear and see it coming down) and its very possible they were picking up ice... witch would have increase their rate of decent, and increased their stalling speed. Not sure what de-ice or anti-ice system a TU22 has, but I know from experience those systems are not entirely reliable, esp. in how they are used.
Well no wonder... He was coming in WAY TOO FAST. Wonder why
@@rockchalk9078,
The plane might had been covered with ice and the pilot had to keep up the speed to maintain enough lift...
Conditions for ice, no visibility, TOGA’d the second he saw the ground. The pilot certainly tried his best.
Perhaps if he flattened the plane out and collapsed the landing gear, it could have stayed intact? Probably would have got fired for that though.
Some confusion.. as the bomber hits, the front breaks off and goes under, the body goes over the top. What is the secondary structure that lands and explodes?
Came in a little hot maybe?
Unreal how, instead of the nose slamming down it breaks off instead. A miracle anyone survived.
Very sad when an aircraft goes down. 😮😢 My sincerest condolences to their family and friends. Requiescat In Pace. 🥺😔❤️💐🌹🌹
excellent gade A virtue signaling there Princess
Careful study of the recording shows a somewhat excessive downward vertical velocity, but not precipitous. Since the body angle was such that the nose gear was not in play, the main gear became a fulcrum and all of the contact energy occurred at its mounts. The fuselage split open from the top, cleanly at that station, suggesting that there may well have been fatigue in the upper diameter at that station from hundreds (thousands) of proper nose high landings. That airplane should not - in my opinion - have broken. The landing was not that hard. by Ron; CFII AIM - 12,000 hrs
Well, your opinion is obviously wrong as the plane quite obviously did break.
@@BL-jt3qtread it again.
@@bjb7587 Read what he said... "That airplane should not - in my opinion - have broken."
@@BL-jt3qt yeah, but he said more than that. I think you missed the context.
@@BL-jt3qt Read, 🤡
That was a positive touchdown...
Oh my god !!! Looks like due to the weather he had problems in seeing the altitude
Сочувствую родным и близким, всем кто знал экипаж. 😔
Ну и хуй с ними
Ошибка экипажа? Самолёт козлил?
Похоже, догонял глиссаду, видно же -вертикальная метров 7, если не больше, была, а потом сунул режим, но поздно. Не приучены военные в СМУ заходить, да и самолет этот еще тот,... Земля пухом...@@aptemdubrovin8623
Вот и такой себе @rkmacdonald - (следующий коммент), - то же самое пишет
@@aptemdubrovin8623 Превышение вертикальной скорости.
Atrocious conditions. RIP to the two crew that didn’t make it (certainly the two in the body of the aircraft, while the nose burned across the runway it never seemed to crush up to the pilots cockpit area). Also MUCH respect to the First Responders who had to deal with that one.
-
For people wondering how the men withstood the conditions to film the landings like that? Vodka.
Нет водки. Просто работа
@@user-mi2tm6br9k And thermal underwear!
One can see why some people might drink...
@@nicolasolton , We don't drink alcohol at work!
@ildarn235 That's good to hear!👍
Why the channel is so underrated?
Now that's some high quality Russian work...
Більше таких посадок.😆
@@saqwert тебе всё равно не поможет.
Помогло - менше всякой дряни в небе.@@user-xw7pv1cv6c
did i see that right? the cockpit sheered off.. and the pilots maybe survive the first hit... but then then the 2nd part of the plane literally hits them right on... wth
2/4 survived
@@beanindividual4000 1/4. 3rd died later 😥
Can you try to make the Reichelsheim Blimp Disaster
В таких погодных условиях он не должен был заходить на посадку. Там видимости было не больше 200 метров.
вы перепутали нижний край облачности с горизонтальной видимостью. (если судить по видеозаписи, то нижний был метров 120-150)
Remember kids, you can always go around
Tbf... Not always...
I too think, that it was some sort of emergency... Look at the weather/visibility...
I doubt any sane pilot would try that approach if they had a choice... Even in wartime...
Maybe taking off, if you know the area(trees, hills etc) but landing???
Hell no.
@@tyrionlannister4920 could be poor situational awareness and inexperience of the pilots could also be a factor
It was a special operation to test the hardness of the ground. All went according to plan.
I wonder if the airframe was past it's EOL and suffered from unchecked metal fatigue then finally broke apart in the rough landing.
Tragic! ✈️😔
в сРахе все всегда полный аналоговнет )))
The gravity push broke the plane in half. Wow
It's remind me of die hard movie part 2 when BA had crash landing on the runway cause the pilot misscalculated the height of the runway. All I can think of is John Mclane standing on the landing path with a torch screaming "PULL UPPP!"
what kind of runway has humps the plane looks extra heavy on touch down....
Летать в такую погоду уже героизм. Служба на северах вызывает уважение, почтение и преклонение со стороны коллег, работающих на южных рубежах.
Мои соболезнования родным и близким❤
По-моему садится в таких условиях это не героизм, а безумие. Это понимал даже человек на земле, поэтому и начал снимать ожидая горячие кадры. К сожалению, он оказался прав
@@vaadim100 это "по-вашему", от незнания специфики лётного дела, службы в дальней авиации и погодных условий в данном конкретном месте. Лишних зевак с видеокамерами там за тысячу вёрст не бывает. Сейчас даже у нотариуса всякие гражданские договора подписываются под камеру, доя вашего сведения.
@@sergeyermolenko6034 Я действительно в этом ничего не понимаю, и со своей дилетантской точки зрения, я бы запретил взлёт и посадку в таких условиях, но профессионалам, конечно, виднее. Самолёт правда разбился
@@vaadim100 погода там меняется в течение получаса - взлетал при синем небе и пока летал три часа, над аэродромом дважды идеальная видимость успела смениться на полное отсутствие видимости (что вы и видите в ролике). И каковы ваши предложения? Мои - наказать автора слива. Эти съёмки совсем не предназначались ради минутной славы и хайпа.
@@vaadim100 ЗЫ поищите ролики в твоя труба с нарезкой бесконечного множества профессиональных посадок Ту-154 и Ту-134. Снималось вовсе не для фиксации случайной катастрофы. Ну таков регламент, да. И порадуйтесь за наших лётчиков.
We can all agree an A-10 could easily survive that.
Right, mainly because an A-10 isn't capable of flying in weather that shitty. So it wouldn't be up there in the first place.
That wasn’t a landing, it was an arrival. Didn’t look like they cleared the snow off the runway and not that many lights were on. Not much in the way of depth perception in those situations. Done a few of them myself, but without incident.
So what went wrong ? Landing seemed to be smooth
The camera man isnt even fazed by it wow
Смущает еще как или ты думаешь что он должен был как с#ка арать во все горло
He kept recording and in frame that’s all he could do to help piece what happened.
As we now know, that plane didn't crash, it was just put on a special operation as a snow plow.
Искали землю в молоке. И нашли её.
This is perfect landing for a guy who carries vodka in a 50 gallon tank in his aircraft
Meh, Russian... shame Putun wasn't on it.
Виноват не пилот а рукамиводитель давший добро
Uy raro muy raro muy raro entonces argentino no soy me quedé muy sorprendido me quedo me dejó con la boca abierta 😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮
Wow. I know it didn't... But it sure looked like he tried landing at a way faster speed than a normal landing speed.
No, I am not a licensed pilot.
And yes, it was a hard landing.
But it does not seem hard enough for a military aircraft to break apart like that.
I personally think it had - at least - something to do with the fact the aircraft was at least 26 years old.
☮
it was built like a paper airplane, thats what it is.
No, it didn't.
@@prophetsnake And when you prove it...I might believe you. Until you do - I don't.
Bye now.
☮
@@McRocket Yeh, sure. Let's ignore the aircrsaft engineer and believe the fjukwit who has "Been in an airplane" You speshul.
Just because an airplane is 26 years old doesn't mean it's structurally weak or otherwise unsafe to fly. There are passenger airliners still cycling that have flown for that long if not longer.
Besides, the Tu-22 is a big aircraft, roughly the size of a B-1 bomber. It came down steep and hard. Obviously.
Aircraft have sink rate limits for a reason. This aircraft exceeded them. The result is self-evident.
I’m no expert on the Tu-22, but that sure doesn’t look like anything resembling a stabilized constant angle approach. What that looks like is a pilot fixated on trying to get back on the glide scope while not properly monitoring their descent rate.
In the description you give the time of the incident but not the date.
Красиво-то как!!!!
Most Russian hardware collapses on impact.
А твои мозги разрушаются при ударе?
Bad design, poor materials, and shoddy manufacturing.@@yesandno389
I assume that some form of ILS was in use, because there was little hope of seeing much of the runway in that blizzard. Obviously the rate of descent was far higher than any commercial plane would take on approach.
They're gonna feel THAT in the morning. 👀
I think the reason of the crash is because the middle where it split did not have enough support and the fuselage was to long
The aircraft design had nothing to do with the crash. This model has been in service since 1972. Do you really think that the experts who design these aircraft would make a simple mistake like that? LoL! The weight, speed and angle that the plane came in on was the cause of the crash. This was a training flight so the pilot was very inexperienced.
@@larsondarcy101 thanks for the response
oof
I guess he missed that day in flight school when they taught you how to flare...
Ok we have to clear the runway for another drunk Russian landing!
First time seeing this one...RIP.
Пацанов жаль, такая нелепая смерть.
В войну 18-20 - летние пацаны становились мужчинами. А у нас всё "пацаны", да "пацаны", хотя в кабине этого самолета далеко не пацаны сидели наверняка. Пора уже наверное взрослеть, не? Вся страна в стиле трудных подростков живет, не доведет это до добра.
Жаль должно быть детей, по домам которых эти "пацаны" без зазрения совести делают пуски ракет!
Вполне заслуженная смерть. Они знали, на кого учились...
Согласен на все 100!@@hose1205
oh that's going to leave a mark
The pilot probably had no other options, nowhere else to go and not enough fuel to get there even if there was. Those two survivors are damn lucky.
That’s less pilots dropping bombs over Ukraine.
i don't understand why the pilot took so many risk trying to land that bomber when he probably had very low vision, he has extreme equipment to tell him everything he needs to know, but he decided to be lazy and landed it too fast.
A bomber plane doesn't have callouts like airliners do, which should be changed.
What do you expect from a russian pilot?
@@DenysEhamberdiyev There you go, you filthy woke bastard
fuel was running out or there was a breakdown because of which it was necessary to land the plane
@@user-zz6hg6yq9l in that weather???
If it really is an emergency, fly high enough over some rural area and eject!
But i admitt, my comment is probably stupid, cause now that i think about it, that bomber probably doesnt have ejection seats 😐😔
Высокая вертикальная скорость. Знакомая погода по работе в мурманской области. Светит солнце потом оглянулся снежная буря пришла потом опять солнце или туман.
Plane disintegrates on landing.
Cameraman: Indifferent.
Мойор Хуев, почащеб таких посадок.
Very sad. RIP to the pilots.
Well, it saved innocent Ukrainians by being targeted by the machine and its crew, so not too sad.....
Death to all Russian pilots
Not sad at all!
@@eroche913 What about innocent Serbs, Iraqis, Libyans, Syrians?
@@user-zx3yn5xd4c what has that got to do with this tu22 crash, and russia’s criminal non-provoked attack on Ukraine, and it’s crimes against humanity in Ukraine?
The quick reaction of the emergency teams shows the deep dedication Russia has to its pilots.
(sarc)
fortune thing the bomb doesn't explode so, nailed it
Думаю с бомбой на борту самолеты не садят так как это опасно
To bad Putin wasn’t onboard
Lets spot the Nazi in the comments. Oh here he is!
@@MicMc539only the Russians are nazis. Most of them.
Жалко, что ты на свет родился.
Oh duck!
I think you sent her a little too hard bud!
I hope the radiator is OK.