Big data: why should you care?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 26 июл 2024
  • In the second episode of Five Minute Masterminds, the author and broadcaster Timandra Harkness introduces big data, explaining how big it actually is, its impact on recent political elections and how it can change your life
    Can we all move to Mars? Prof Martin Rees on space exploration - video
    'Big Data, Does Size Matter? by Timandra Harkness
    Guardian privacy policy

Комментарии • 34

  • @gavinthecrafter
    @gavinthecrafter 3 года назад +23

    I like this video but you didn’t answer the question: Why should I care about all of this data being used?

  • @cryptomarxist
    @cryptomarxist 11 месяцев назад +1

    I've never been intellectually scared into not skipping a video, LOL, as if I'm actually going to apply for NASA,ROFL!!!

  • @stephenpowstinger733
    @stephenpowstinger733 5 лет назад +3

    This older American needed closed-captioning to understand her but the illustrations are good. The subject is timely.

  • @z4k4z
    @z4k4z 5 лет назад +1

    Informative and balanced.

  • @thisisbob1001
    @thisisbob1001 5 лет назад +2

    Big data. Big hard drive.

  • @johnfitzgerald7618
    @johnfitzgerald7618 5 лет назад +3

    Data is not information. Information consists of data that reduce uncertainty. The problem with any data, big or small, is that it will be taken as informative when it is not.

  • @harishv9968
    @harishv9968 3 года назад

    Data is the most valuable asset on the planet Earth.

  • @lukyluke4008
    @lukyluke4008 5 лет назад +5

    Thanks for the very informing video! I enjoyed it :)

  • @jzk2020
    @jzk2020 5 лет назад +8

    WRONG. I use adblocker like most intelligent people. 0:04

    • @intoeleven
      @intoeleven 5 лет назад +1

      C. Lincoln you still can see ads at RUclips and being tracked by google

  • @zax1998LU
    @zax1998LU 5 лет назад +2

    0:18 bit extreme. I don't think it goes that far but ok.

    • @jeremyjery01
      @jeremyjery01 2 года назад

      Definitely I can see it in the far future

  • @Dejonic97
    @Dejonic97 5 лет назад +17

    "Politics is about the content of the messages, not the platform that delivers them."
    This is most patently misinformed thing I've ever heard.
    How did this statement make it in? This is a fundamental misunderstanding of everything about politics.
    Maybe in an ideal world, that's what it would be about. However, in our world, the medium significantly impacts the message, whether that's method of distribution, the voicing of the message or the form in which its delivered.

    • @crawford2871
      @crawford2871 5 лет назад

      >boomers pretending they understand new media

    • @32lkrpo2fjm
      @32lkrpo2fjm 5 лет назад +1

      When you grow up you will understand. Maybe.

    • @HugoFauzi
      @HugoFauzi 5 лет назад +1

      Politics can't be reduced to elections

    • @32lkrpo2fjm
      @32lkrpo2fjm 5 лет назад

      @@HugoFauzi I agree. If you can arrange public music contests where half a billion people can enter their choice in seconds with the help of technology, it should be possible to let people have a more direct and continuous access to the decision making process. On voluntary basis.

    • @Odysseusf
      @Odysseusf 3 года назад

      I agree with you. This is just wrong. How can anyone believe in that? (Stephen Bannon had an entire team working on search engine optimisation and cracking the recommendation algorithm of Facebook, by the way.)

  • @LizzyYou
    @LizzyYou 5 лет назад +1

    😂In order to keep DATA out of your "Byiyizzuissizznes"
    Don't Care

  • @johnfitzgerald7618
    @johnfitzgerald7618 5 лет назад

    Politics was reduced to a marketing campaign decades ago. The size of the data sets has nothing to do with it. Here's a simple principle: A small random sample will be more informative than a large non-random sample.

  • @englishindulgence3862
    @englishindulgence3862 5 лет назад +5

    I don't like being blackmailed, so I stopped watching when she said: "If you stop watching now [...] in five year times some recruiting algorithm will reject you for that job as an astronaut". Even assuming this was just a way of making the point that my online data could be used to assess my application for a job, it was arrogant to suggest that a prospective employer would regard as positive watching this video which, according to the comments, seems to have pretty basic and low-quality information.

    • @json7598
      @json7598 Год назад

      I think it was a joke but delivered deadpan

  • @johnfitzgerald7618
    @johnfitzgerald7618 5 лет назад

    "Certainly t helped people to know which voters to target." How do you know that? What were the validity coefficients for their predictions? How do you get valid predictions out of non-probability samples, which all samples of attitude data are?

  • @muradnnolaki6788
    @muradnnolaki6788 2 года назад

    "Keep the humans in control"

  • @yapp1972
    @yapp1972 6 месяцев назад

    who is still watching this 2023

  • @SirAmicVarze
    @SirAmicVarze 5 лет назад +4

    Most of this was very tech illiterate. It would've been better to bring on an actual data scientist rather than just some broadcaster.

  • @PaulJHowell
    @PaulJHowell 5 лет назад +1

    influence is absolutely about the platform and the message...that's a crucial part of manipulation. to not know that and not account for that is negligent...and yeah..."let's use it the white way"...? kool aid drunk here...

    • @32lkrpo2fjm
      @32lkrpo2fjm 5 лет назад

      You are standing to close to the mirror.

    • @PaulJHowell
      @PaulJHowell 5 лет назад

      If you think the context in which influence is asserted is irrelevant to the outcome, you must also not believe in evolution.

  • @hansypants
    @hansypants 5 лет назад +5

    Is that a man or a woman?

    • @Patrick-jj5nh
      @Patrick-jj5nh 5 лет назад +5

      Oh dad, bless you. Just pick up your bottle and go back to the basement. See you at Christmas.

    • @alexverdigris9939
      @alexverdigris9939 5 лет назад

      It's a confusion-generating entity for idiots.