Just FYI, the 'HYPE' naming of the IEM is, in ThieAudio's own marketing words, a mashup of the first two letters from the words 'Hybrid' and 'Performance' ...
Hi @audiolevels - You have mentioned many times on your videos to ask if we would like a recommendation. Well, I would like your advise. I am looking for an all BA set (under $300) with good strong bass and mid bass. Can you recommend any sets? Also, do you have any experience with GS Audio? Thanks in advance!!
I wish they could make Monarch mkll smaller or custom..or Prestige ltd custome.I have small ears especially my left one is a tough guy..I wonder how Hype compares to Gz audio Chopin
yea i am agree with u, the chifi manufacturers is indeed tearing the well established brands around, with fair is when $300 chifi can get near enough from sound quality with japan, europe or western brands cost 3 times more or kilo bucks
I am impressed with your review! I bought the hype2 and was massively disappointed... Most of my artists sounded not natural at all ... Like other persons... Bass and sub bass are not present on most of my library... EDM is fantastic.... I just had the impression that mine were faulty....
i though it was a dual DD of same 10mm size in isobaric , and it was the dunu davinci that 2 DD of different sizes, one for sub bass and one for subbass
That is the Mest Cable and you should be able to order adapters for it that the 3.5 plugs into to change it to 2.5 or 4mm balanced. The reason I know this is I ordered that cable over a year ago now because it came with adapters. I own the Skuld and love them and I bought them because of your video about them. I was lucky enough to get a used like new still in the box for $350 on ebay. I have to ask would the Hype2 be an improvement or just a side grade with more bass? Thanks for the video on this set and I'll keep them in mind and look for a used set possibly. I'm going to leave some important information below that many have never seen. It may make some angry or even confused as to why I'd post it on this video. If it does I do apologize but it really is that important. If it helps just one person it would be so worth it and if that person gets it they will share in my freedom and joy. Study is so important and one day a week is simply not enough. Buying into all the falsehoods of why it's not true or can't be His Word is deadly. With the amount of proof we now have in this age of abundance of information there's simply no longer any excuse or argument to be made. So here goes and for those that do read it please just think about what it means and will mean for you if you take it seriously: The case for Biblical accuracy and how we know we have the absolute, proven true Word of God in our modern Bibles if they maintain a word for word translation or as close as possible. First let's look at secular history and written sources that are taken as matter of fact. These other books and writings from antiquity are held up as truth and in some cases factual history. These other books/poems and there evidence/sources, data: Second most common manuscript document Homer's Iliad meaning there are more copies of it than any other secular writing/document from antiquity of which only 643 exist dating from 13th century AD. Homer is believed to have wrote it in the 8th century BC. The Gallic Wars of Cesar in 1st century BC, there are only 10 manuscripts of that in existence dating over 1000 years after they were supposed to have been written. Herodotus wrote of history and is known as one of the first historians 5th century BC and only 8 manuscripts exist and they are from more than 1300 years after he wrote anything. History of the Peloponnesian War written by Thucydides. There are only 8 manuscripts that are from 1300 years after he supposedly wrote his account. These are just a few examples but it doesn't get any better by adding more. Now let's look at Biblical proofs: There can be no doubt as to the accuracy of our current Bibles as it is proven via all the source fragments, scrolls, papyri, codex' and sources dating all the way back to before Christ around 700 BC for the OT and between 100 to 150 AD for the NT. There is no doubt and no room for any argument against these facts. We have more proof for God's Word than any other written word in history and it is by order of magnitudes more as in some 66,000+ such sources for Scripture. The early Church Fathers prior to 325 AD: Those known as the Anti-Nicene Fathers writings contain over 32,000 quotes from the New Testament from which we could reconstruct the entire/complete NT from just those. They also contain over 19,000+ quotes from the Gospels alone again from prior to 325 AD. All these sources allow us to be critical when it comes to the level of accuracy in our Bibles. The oldest manuscripts end The Gospel of Mark at chapter 16 verse 8. It is the perfect ending to Mark's Gospel when you think about it as there really was no more that needed said. There is a lot of evidence that anything after Mark 16:8 was added later gathering parts from all the other Gospels and even Acts. There have been many ideas put forward about why the rest was added but none truly fits, things such as knowing Mark's intent and inspiration and that had he been able he would have added to his Gospel. That after Peter was martyred he stopped short due to that but if you read his Gospel there's no need for anything to be added. There's also some idea that there's a lost ending but how can you think that if you don't even know if such an ending existed? So a bunch of endings began to appear, tacked onto the original Autograph. We have an abundance of evidence that prove anything after 16:8 was added later. 4th Century Church fathers Eusebius and Gerome both wrote that Mark ended after 16:8. Many, many other very early Church Fathers knew these alternate endings existed and didn't use them or just denounced them. This is a huge error in both the KJV and NKJV both of which are based on more recent manuscripts that the older manuscripts disprove. So those two translations have the added ending consisting of anything after Mark 16:8 in the Gospel of Mark. Newer translations may or may not include the additions after Mark 16:8 but if they do they're bracketed or mentioned in the notes in the margins, sidebar or at the bottom of the page. The external evidence, (oldest sources), indicates that anything after 16:8 does not belong in the Gospel of Mark because those additions simply do not exist in them. The internal evidence is that it is all borrowed from the other Gospel accounts and Acts. The transition from vs 8 to 9 is very awkward as in no transition from the story of the women, the use of a masculine pronoun, why would Mark also identify Mary Magdalene as the one whom Jesus cast demons from again, the angel spoke to Jesus' followers and told them He would appear to them in Galilee, the vocabulary is not Mark's there are 18 different words he never used, completely different structure to the writing, all these out of place themes, signs that don't appear in any of the other Gospels and the weird discussion of them like serpents and other such oddities are foreign to Mark. We don't know who these additions came from but we know where they got them: (below are not time stamps but Chapter and verses) .16:9 = is taken write out of Luke 8:1-3 .16:10 = John 20:18 .16:12 = Luke 24:13-32 .16:13 = Luke 24:14 .16:14 = Luke 24:36-38 .16:15 = Mathew 28:19 .16:16 = John 20:23 .16:17-18 = drawn from a lot of sources: Mathew 10, Mark 6, Luke 10, just a lot of stuff cobbled together. Acts 23-26 and Acts 28:3-6 Paul's encounter with the Asp/venomous snake. None of it after Mark 16:8 makes any sense and adds more than a little confusion with the discussion of signs/miracles and other such things. It is clear to see what was written after 16:8 was not inspired as the rest of his Gospel surely was. This was all done by someone or a group who thought Mark's ending was to brief. To help him get a "better ending" in their eyes because they couldn't accept how he had ended his. His True Gospel account of the life, death and resurrection of Christ Jesus and the awe and wonderment of it all. Why does Mark end the way he ends? It was just how he wrote, look at the beginning of his Gospel and all throughout it reads like a highlight real of Christ's Deity and that He is in fact the very Son of God. He made the point and was done he didn't need to go further. Mark's last words were about fear, a Godly Fear of our Lord and the pure awe and wonderment of Him. No other book in history has the proof the Bible does, it is not even close. As I've shown because of the over abundance of source materials we can even be critical of what we have and know for certain whether we have His Word or not. Biblical Historian/Theologian AT. Robertson said we have a vast array of Biblical Manuscripts/Sources that allow us to reconstruct the Bible with more than a 99.9% degree of accuracy. With the number of archaeological excavations, (25,000+ and counting to date). Then add the current excavations under way throughout the Middle East, it is only a matter of time until we see more ancient biblical texts uncovered. Given the recent search for more Dead Sea Scroll caves, this may be sooner rather than later. The Bible is the very Word of God and there's no longer any excuse for anyone to ignore that fact or to dispute it. The evidence simply does not support their arguments/views. Take care and God Bless...
Great review. I have always wanted a set of Thieaudio IEMs, but I wasn't aware they made more affordable IEMs. Do you think these are an upgrade from my Performer 5s? These look fantastic and you say they sound great!
The Performer5s punch well above their price point and I don’t believe the Hype are a direct upgrade. I own both the Performer5 and Performer8 and would keep both in my rotation as they’re both excellent at their respective MSRP. The P8s are an unbelievably detailed set and have amazing value for money. I also don’t believe it’s accurate to call these a “starter” Monarch MK3, but they may be a good entry point into the Thieaudio “house tuning” to give you more of an idea on whether or not you’re going to enjoy their other offerings. The market is bustling at the moment; it’s both a great time to be in this hobby, but also a confusing time if you’re unsure of exactly which IEMs you prefer.
@@marksr12 I don't "love" Zeos, but his review of these yesterday was not stellar. Complained over overly V-shaped sound signature and the symbals crashing at high volumes were hurting his ears. He said the bass was too much and mids were too recessed.
I actually own both and I can clearly day that these are a clear upgrade over the performer 5 if you want much better bass quality (performer 5 in the sub is pretty flabby) and better treble transients. Performer 5 is good if you like the dark, warm relaxed sound but hype 2 is a much more energetic listen.
@@drewmorg.he's literally the only reviewer to call it v-shaped lol. Love him but I don't share his iem views considering how weirdly tuned his collabs usually turn out.
Great to hear it's turned out well! Could you please compare its size with the new Monarch's? I've seen another review saying that this is the Oracle's shell (and cable), and I started to wonder.
That is the same cable that came with my original Monarch, except that my Monarch’s cable is a 2.5 mm with modular 3.5 mm and 4.4 mm plugs. It is a nice cable. I bought another one to go with my Moondrop S8.
Just FYI, the 'HYPE' naming of the IEM is, in ThieAudio's own marketing words, a mashup of the first two letters from the words 'Hybrid' and 'Performance' ...
Nicely Done.
Any chance you mind sharing some of your jazz track that you talk about in the video ?
Thanks
Hi @audiolevels - You have mentioned many times on your videos to ask if we would like a recommendation. Well, I would like your advise. I am looking for an all BA set (under $300) with good strong bass and mid bass. Can you recommend any sets? Also, do you have any experience with GS Audio? Thanks in advance!!
You're spot on with the name, When I saw "hype" in the name and immediately thought well this iem must be trash with hype in the name lol
Would you say the soundstage is expansive and 3D / holographic? Hype 2
I wish they could make Monarch mkll smaller or custom..or Prestige ltd custome.I have small ears especially my left one is a tough guy..I wonder how Hype compares to Gz audio Chopin
I love mine. They are a solid earphone. Very easy to drive--- they work well straight from your phone.
does your hype 2 had driver rattle?
@@wakokokwakekek9244 None.
yea i am agree with u, the chifi manufacturers is indeed tearing the well established brands around, with fair is when $300 chifi can get near enough from sound quality with japan, europe or western brands cost 3 times more or kilo bucks
I am impressed with your review! I bought the hype2 and was massively disappointed... Most of my artists sounded not natural at all ... Like other persons... Bass and sub bass are not present on most of my library... EDM is fantastic.... I just had the impression that mine were faulty....
i though it was a dual DD of same 10mm size in isobaric , and it was the dunu davinci that 2 DD of different sizes, one for sub bass and one for subbass
That is the Mest Cable and you should be able to order adapters for it that the 3.5 plugs into to change it to 2.5 or 4mm balanced. The reason I know this is I ordered that cable over a year ago now because it came with adapters. I own the Skuld and love them and I bought them because of your video about them. I was lucky enough to get a used like new still in the box for $350 on ebay. I have to ask would the Hype2 be an improvement or just a side grade with more bass? Thanks for the video on this set and I'll keep them in mind and look for a used set possibly.
I'm going to leave some important information below that many have never seen. It may make some angry or even confused as to why I'd post it on this video. If it does I do apologize but it really is that important. If it helps just one person it would be so worth it and if that person gets it they will share in my freedom and joy. Study is so important and one day a week is simply not enough. Buying into all the falsehoods of why it's not true or can't be His Word is deadly. With the amount of proof we now have in this age of abundance of information there's simply no longer any excuse or argument to be made. So here goes and for those that do read it please just think about what it means and will mean for you if you take it seriously:
The case for Biblical accuracy and how we know we have the absolute, proven true Word of God in our modern Bibles if they maintain a word for word translation or as close as possible.
First let's look at secular history and written sources that are taken as matter of fact. These other books and writings from antiquity are held up as truth and in some cases factual history.
These other books/poems and there evidence/sources, data:
Second most common manuscript document Homer's Iliad meaning there are more copies of it than any other secular writing/document from antiquity of which only 643 exist dating from 13th century AD. Homer is believed to have wrote it in the 8th century BC.
The Gallic Wars of Cesar in 1st century BC, there are only 10 manuscripts of that in existence dating over 1000 years after they were supposed to have been written.
Herodotus wrote of history and is known as one of the first historians 5th century BC and only 8 manuscripts exist and they are from more than 1300 years after he wrote anything.
History of the Peloponnesian War written by Thucydides. There are only 8 manuscripts that are from 1300 years after he supposedly wrote his account.
These are just a few examples but it doesn't get any better by adding more.
Now let's look at Biblical proofs:
There can be no doubt as to the accuracy of our current Bibles as it is proven via all the source fragments, scrolls, papyri, codex' and sources dating all the way back to before Christ around 700 BC for the OT and between 100 to 150 AD for the NT. There is no doubt and no room for any argument against these facts. We have more proof for God's Word than any other written word in history and it is by order of magnitudes more as in some 66,000+ such sources for Scripture.
The early Church Fathers prior to 325 AD:
Those known as the Anti-Nicene Fathers writings contain over 32,000 quotes from the New Testament from which we could reconstruct the entire/complete NT from just those.
They also contain over 19,000+ quotes from the Gospels alone again from prior to 325 AD.
All these sources allow us to be critical when it comes to the level of accuracy in our Bibles.
The oldest manuscripts end The Gospel of Mark at chapter 16 verse 8. It is the perfect ending to Mark's Gospel when you think about it as there really was no more that needed said.
There is a lot of evidence that anything after Mark 16:8 was added later gathering parts from all the other Gospels and even Acts. There have been many ideas put forward about why the rest was added but none truly fits, things such as knowing Mark's intent and inspiration and that had he been able he would have added to his Gospel. That after Peter was martyred he stopped short due to that but if you read his Gospel there's no need for anything to be added. There's also some idea that there's a lost ending but how can you think that if you don't even know if such an ending existed? So a bunch of endings began to appear, tacked onto the original Autograph. We have an abundance of evidence that prove anything after 16:8 was added later.
4th Century Church fathers Eusebius and Gerome both wrote that Mark ended after 16:8. Many, many other very early Church Fathers knew these alternate endings existed and didn't use them or just denounced them.
This is a huge error in both the KJV and NKJV both of which are based on more recent manuscripts that the older manuscripts disprove. So those two translations have the added ending consisting of anything after Mark 16:8 in the Gospel of Mark. Newer translations may or may not include the additions after Mark 16:8 but if they do they're bracketed or mentioned in the notes in the margins, sidebar or at the bottom of the page.
The external evidence, (oldest sources), indicates that anything after 16:8 does not belong in the Gospel of Mark because those additions simply do not exist in them.
The internal evidence is that it is all borrowed from the other Gospel accounts and Acts. The transition from vs 8 to 9 is very awkward as in no transition from the story of the women, the use of a masculine pronoun, why would Mark also identify Mary Magdalene as the one whom Jesus cast demons from again, the angel spoke to Jesus' followers and told them He would appear to them in Galilee, the vocabulary is not Mark's there are 18 different words he never used, completely different structure to the writing, all these out of place themes, signs that don't appear in any of the other Gospels and the weird discussion of them like serpents and other such oddities are foreign to Mark.
We don't know who these additions came from but we know where they got them:
(below are not time stamps but Chapter and verses)
.16:9 = is taken write out of Luke 8:1-3
.16:10 = John 20:18
.16:12 = Luke 24:13-32
.16:13 = Luke 24:14
.16:14 = Luke 24:36-38
.16:15 = Mathew 28:19
.16:16 = John 20:23
.16:17-18 = drawn from a lot of sources: Mathew 10, Mark 6, Luke 10, just a lot of stuff cobbled together. Acts 23-26 and Acts 28:3-6 Paul's encounter with the Asp/venomous snake. None of it after Mark 16:8 makes any sense and adds more than a little confusion with the discussion of signs/miracles and other such things. It is clear to see what was written after 16:8 was not inspired as the rest of his Gospel surely was.
This was all done by someone or a group who thought Mark's ending was to brief. To help him get a "better ending" in their eyes because they couldn't accept how he had ended his. His True Gospel account of the life, death and resurrection of Christ Jesus and the awe and wonderment of it all.
Why does Mark end the way he ends?
It was just how he wrote, look at the beginning of his Gospel and all throughout it reads like a highlight real of Christ's Deity and that He is in fact the very Son of God. He made the point and was done he didn't need to go further.
Mark's last words were about fear, a Godly Fear of our Lord and the pure awe and wonderment of Him.
No other book in history has the proof the Bible does, it is not even close. As I've shown because of the over abundance of source materials we can even be critical of what we have and know for certain whether we have His Word or not.
Biblical Historian/Theologian AT. Robertson said we have a vast array of Biblical Manuscripts/Sources that allow us to reconstruct the Bible with more than a 99.9% degree of accuracy.
With the number of archaeological excavations, (25,000+ and counting to date). Then add the current excavations under way throughout the Middle East, it is only a matter of time until we see more ancient biblical texts uncovered. Given the recent search for more Dead Sea Scroll caves, this may be sooner rather than later.
The Bible is the very Word of God and there's no longer any excuse for anyone to ignore that fact or to dispute it. The evidence simply does not support their arguments/views.
Take care and God Bless...
Great review. I have always wanted a set of Thieaudio IEMs, but I wasn't aware they made more affordable IEMs. Do you think these are an upgrade from my Performer 5s? These look fantastic and you say they sound great!
The Performer5s punch well above their price point and I don’t believe the Hype are a direct upgrade. I own both the Performer5 and Performer8 and would keep both in my rotation as they’re both excellent at their respective MSRP. The P8s are an unbelievably detailed set and have amazing value for money. I also don’t believe it’s accurate to call these a “starter” Monarch MK3, but they may be a good entry point into the Thieaudio “house tuning” to give you more of an idea on whether or not you’re going to enjoy their other offerings.
The market is bustling at the moment; it’s both a great time to be in this hobby, but also a confusing time if you’re unsure of exactly which IEMs you prefer.
Thanks,makes perfect sense. I've only had my P5s for a couple of months and they are great. Why are we always chasing something better?@@Silverjerk
@@marksr12 I don't "love" Zeos, but his review of these yesterday was not stellar. Complained over overly V-shaped sound signature and the symbals crashing at high volumes were hurting his ears. He said the bass was too much and mids were too recessed.
I actually own both and I can clearly day that these are a clear upgrade over the performer 5 if you want much better bass quality (performer 5 in the sub is pretty flabby) and better treble transients. Performer 5 is good if you like the dark, warm relaxed sound but hype 2 is a much more energetic listen.
@@drewmorg.he's literally the only reviewer to call it v-shaped lol. Love him but I don't share his iem views considering how weirdly tuned his collabs usually turn out.
How would these compare to Kiwi ears Quintet as a comparison?
does it rattle?
Hello sir. Is the Dunu sa6 mk2 worth the price? is it really good? or is this one better? or save for mk3?
I have the sennheiser ie 600. They are real good. But what is the next upgrade for me ?
Great to hear it's turned out well! Could you please compare its size with the new Monarch's? I've seen another review saying that this is the Oracle's shell (and cable), and I started to wonder.
Yes I will, the original oracle or the ii?
@@AudioLevels Thank you! The OG.
That is the same cable that came with my original Monarch, except that my Monarch’s cable is a 2.5 mm with modular 3.5 mm and 4.4 mm plugs. It is a nice cable. I bought another one to go with my Moondrop S8.
when did u start order it ?
Hi,
Are you scottish or irish? Where do you buy your audio gears here in UK?
😂 I am going to say Scottish (based on the Scottish accent) and if I am correct in assuming, he is not in the UK (Asia based)
You sound like a British Bernardo Faria.
his audio is very bad! it is lousy I might say!!!