Super zoom in on the moon shot with 150x optical zoom - 0:30 + 350x digital zoom - 1:38. Shot with Sigma 150-600mm super telephoto lens + 3 x 2x teleconverters.
@@CatchEm_In_GA Did you know that the size of an average satellite is similar to the size of a motorcycle? Not all satellites are HUGE like the International Space Station.
This has to be the most impressive moon observation on the Internet. It feels like I'm flying over its surface, and I noted that shadow at 1:44 like many others, to my eyes it looked like a shadow of a bird in flight. I wish they had such powerful telescopes in schools, they would inspire millions of people and make us care more about our place in the galaxy. Thanks for sharing.
@@LeighDWYC Ah yes, I can still recall my first viewing of the moon's passing over the mirror of my Meade 900 reflector telescope, a real life changing moment.
1:44 you see this all the time using high magnification on the moon. It's just satellites. you should see it when the moon is strait azimuth, so many black dots zooming through the FOV.
ok watch 2.40 from left to right from the mid bottom of the screen and tell me what I saw ???? if it was a bird it would of blacked out all of the shot of the moon.... just a dark shadow but was going at some rate.
It's really hard to say if that's a bird at 1:44 because the shadow is being cast on the moon surface you can even see the shadow change shape depending on the elevation of the surface. If it's an artificial satellite, do we have a satellite orbiting the moon? Cause it could simply be the shadow of that.
i don't know what that thing is at 1:41 but i love that so many people noticed it without this being a '"did you see that ? what could that be" ? many of us notice things like this because we ARE looking for something
Is that the final layer we can see into? Some areas of the moon are supposed to be much deeper, like several miles, are we able to see the difference in depth? Very nice shots
En todos los videos si mira cm si estuviera a dentro del agua por sus ondas que hace jejejeje o todo es holografico ......somos solo gente caricatura xe
Odji Ramirez you can’t see it, mostly because it isn’t by the craters and it is literally like looking for a penny with a telescope from Florida to New York
Yes you are right one more thing the shadow is sharper and smaller.that means its not near camera.its a fall off shadow in moon itself might be the shadow of some satellite orbitting moon.and its very near moon.
Can you guys believe that if somehow somone where on there and you had a conversation with that person you will be seeing that person 1 second in the past? Because of the light speed
nice video good and close how many lens do you have on there ? I only have one and I can get just as close the Nikon P1000 is a beast . nice work brother keep it up.
Its far away but very big. It is a bit hard to understand scale especially from a human perspective. Its like zooming to Africa from 384.000 km. You would definetely catch detail.
Charged Couple Devices works just like our LRD "Light Receiving Diodes" or LRRD "Light Receiving Receiver Diodes" in our military satellites. CCDs in digital cameras and telescopes or zoom lens cameras works just our LRD and LRRD systems. Our LRD and LRRD systems works essentially like a normal eye retina that receives light and automatically display/record it as a still and/or moving picture. I believe I better take a refreasher engineering course to re-remember my college lessons and to keep abrest with certain overlooked technologies since I have been busy with the machine tool department as an occasional adviser from time to time.
Wow.. Nice job.. Best ever. Moon video... Perhaps you can use the Same equipment to film the horizon... I mean a sunset and see if the curvature of the world would hide buildings or big ships...
Fer Ch you can see the curvature of the earth hiding part of the moon every time it rises or sets with your naked eyes. A telescope would produce a higher resolution at a higher magnification.
Fer Ch I don’t understand, you do not see the moon disappearing behind the horizon everyday? I have a DSLR with some decent lenses, and a telescope with focal reducers and Barlow lenses (9130mm fl) that I use on my channel. Is there anything in particular you are looking for?
@@IBHunter there is no clear skies in Lima, ever... 😕 But, I am looking for a picture or video that shows earth is flat, or if it shows curvature like it should... Thanks
Fer Ch you are not kidding! You really have clouds all the time! I checked out the weather there! I am not home now, but I do have a picture I took at the the beach in Galveston Texas last year. All I had at the time was a 16-55 mm kit lens with very little magnification, but you could easily see the ships obstructed by the horizon with your naked eyes! This picture has 7 large ships in it at different distances away. drive.google.com/file/d/1WO91FvwhHRpgOpVEtityy442rZz_0FIt/view?usp=drivesdk I have worked for a survey company that specialized in marine navigation. If the earth was flat, or job would have been so much easier, but in order for measurements to come out correctly, they had to be based on a WGS84 geoid. If you have at least a couple of clear nights in a year, I have a suggestion you can do yourself with almost any camera.
Of course they do. Birds, bats and insects fly between you and the moon all the time. A zoom or a telescope won't make you "closer" to the moon, they will just make it look bigger. So the birds and bugs that fly a few meters over you can still be seen in your eyepiece.
Easy : They simply picked clear landing sites. The photograph we see here does not make the Moon's size justice : Even those little craters we see near the end of the video are huge, dozens of km across. So you can find plenty of flat surfaces to land a 4m module on if you chose your landing site carefully, and if you have a pilot able to make last second adjustments to pick the best patch in the selected area. Stil pretty impressive, though. Breaking a landing gear (or anything else) on a rock at touchdown would have meant no return trip, and a pair of corpses on the Moon instead of a flag.
+I_am_Potato_ I don't know what it was but I'm sure it was not a bird flying in the night at that altitude (at that zoom - a bird would cover the entire image for a short period of time). Maybe some kind of space rock, satellite or yes, a UFO.
good because I want to see the American flag that you put on the moon and they're better still there if somebody took it away from there want you to find out who took it and ask them to put it back
Jose Mendez also, get this: with technology this powerful, you should just be able to aim anywhere and zoom until a "satellite" becomes visible, but does anyone ever do that? nope! because they're not up there. they don't exist.
OMG you can see Chuck Norris training on the moon. But on a serious note, with all the people all over the world looking at the moon closely, why doesn't anyone capture any impacts or plumes of impacts on the moon. I mean holy crap it's been nailed more times than any porn star in history ya think someone would catch a hit.
yep born, we are only provided with some retarded very poor quality pics of a Esa/Nasa (who cares) "probe" crashing into the moon's surface, and the video and pics from Esa/Nasa (who cares) are of an unbelievable poor quality.... they just can't be true if you compare with the details an amature can present with some high end camera.... strange for sure, suspiscious at least...
I agree. something smells. I mean just on youtube you have people that can basically look at the moon from 3000 feet or better and nobody see's any meteoric strikes. Then there's the guys with mini Hubble telescopes in their yard who can count every hole. And what makes it even stranger is the moon has no atmosphere to protect the surface from......well, anything so why no once in a while mile high dust plume and tomorrow.....BINGO a new giant hole.
ummmmmmm I not seeing any live impacts during this video. Sure I see a shit ton of holes. but nothing dramatic like say even something the size of a bowling ball slamming into the surface at 17,000 mph that would leave a very significant hole and plume of dust I'd say. please time stamp it where you think you see a impacter.
born68 - Nice how, when shown wrong, you change your argument from 'no one's captured any impacts' to 'no live impacts in this video clip'. Impacts large enough to be seen from earth, even with a high-powered telescope, are rare, so picking one up in a less than 3 minute video clip is highly unlikely.
Zoom in on the Rover we left behind or show us one of them 4 flags we left That's what i thought we never went to the moon or someone would of spotted them by now.
Even with the most powerful telescopes on Earth all you can see is a dot. Don't show your unintelligence because you don't understand how far away stuff is. If you think we can see that stuff with a freaking DSLR you're really stretching it.
Carmen Xero they can scope a 100000000000billion lightyears from earth, then they cant post an update whats happen to the flag around the moon?? OMG sorry for my bad english
Genius Intelligence exactly. these official version shills always say they're too far away to see, while others actually say other Apollo "missions" brought everything back. they can't get their stories straight because none of them know what they're talking about. This same technology however. could adequately show vehicles, houses and streets on an aerial view of earth's landscapes. no signs of mankind on the moon.
also, get this: with technology this powerful, you should just be able to aim anywhere and zoom until a "satellite" becomes visible, but does anyone ever do that? nope! because they're not up there. they don't exist.
@Age of Reason and @Genious Intelligence, PLEASE first read up on how optical resolution works and then come back and show us how you are going to resolve 2m on the moon from Earth with any optics in existence right now! People like you always feel confident enough to use computers to make bold statements. Yet they don't even grasp the basics of optics that determined the smallest features in their PCs CPU and also limits what you can see from Earth with available instrumentation. It is physicists and engineers like me, who always have to wonder how people with obviously so little understanding of the subject can feel competent enough to make such bold statements as you did. By the way: maybe also read up on the Dunning-Kruger-Effect!
Little Ricky'sFlyingCircus also, get this: with technology this powerful, you should just be able to aim anywhere and zoom until a "satellite" becomes visible, but does anyone ever do that? nope! because they're not up there. they don't exist.
That is GORGEOUS work! I am SO jealous lol but at least you are sharing this beautiful visual display so I am not so jealous bahaha Thank you for sharing 👍🏻
Abbas also, get this: with technology this powerful, you should just be able to aim anywhere and zoom until a "satellite" becomes visible, but does anyone ever do that? nope! because they're not up there. they don't exist.
+Age of Reason thanks for reply....do you mean by the last sentence that there is no flag on the moon ? i hope to have a better zoom to see more details on the moon
Did you have a moon filter on? I am guessing yes. I use a green one on occasion to keep the brightness down. I would suggest you concentrate your viewing on the side of the moon. That in my opinion you will gain the most out of this set up. At 1:18 and at 1:42 shows beautiful side shots of the moon. Beautiful man. Thanks for the show!
You have to believe one of two things. Either a video camera can zoom in to see the surface clearly of an object traveling 2,000 mph 200,000 miles away while stand on an object spinning 1,000 mph... Or the more logical truth. The earth has been proven to be flat. Open your eyes.
The logical truth is that the guy is using a tripod and a steady hand to aim the camera at the moon. What's not to get is beyond me. The numbers you're spewing out are relative. Something moving 2,000 mph at 200+k miles away appears to move far slower from your point of view because it's so far away. Ever looked outside the window of a moving car to a far object and then back again at an object closer to you? They appear to move at different rates. The same logic applies.
Harry Plinkett also, get this: with technology this powerful, you should just be able to aim anywhere and zoom until a "satellite" becomes visible, but does anyone ever do that? nope! because they're not up there. they don't exist.
@jspr2k5...logic does not effect the mind of a flat earther... no need to try. It's about belief, not logic to them one can never prove anything to them.
And they Say, the Moon is 384,400 km !!!! But we can see detail even through our own Eyes !!!! 384,400 yeh Right, pull the other one " It plays Jingle Bells"
jolly Jumper also, get this: with technology this powerful, you should just be able to aim anywhere and zoom until a "satellite" becomes visible, but does anyone ever do that? nope! because they're not up there. they don't exist.
if the moon was 240,000 miles away it would have to be huge for me to see the detail that I can see on it with my own eyes but it's not that big. Also what are the odds that the moon is 400x smaller and 400x closer than the sun so it appears to be the exact same size as the sun? bullshit they're both much closer and smaller and you've been lied to. Crepuscular rays of the sun prove this through simple trigonometry
Наука
1:44 space birds confirmed
Maybe fishes.
may be it is international space station..
hahahahaha....lol, thats alien bird
Hahahah great :D
Birds! Anything To across the lens to prejudicate the image.
i saw my footsteps there .
That means your eyes are very sharp 😂
@@siam36029 yes😂
@@Sp_pundir20 🤣
Lol
Did you went there
At 1:44 there is a shadow of something crossing.
yas
right
also saw that
its might be the "ISS" international space station..
*****
I think the shadow was too small, which implies something closer to the Moon's surface.
1:43 ..something was flying by
+Tome Rodrigo Yeah it's the flying bat people living on the moon.
+Tome Rodrigo a bird lol
you really think bird is so small when you zoomed to MOON? in this case bird would cover the whole image.
it was shadow of a satelite
but the speed is crazy xd
1:44" Satellite acrossing front the lens.
Francisco Hormaza. Right on! Orbit - sattelite tracker app. Very accurate. Also planes live app.
or space junk
How was it so small?
@@CatchEm_In_GA Did you know that the size of an average satellite is similar to the size of a motorcycle?
Not all satellites are HUGE like the International Space Station.
@@CatchEm_In_GA this is shadow
This has to be the most impressive moon observation on the Internet. It feels like I'm flying over its surface, and I noted that shadow at 1:44 like many others, to my eyes it looked like a shadow of a bird in flight. I wish they had such powerful telescopes in schools, they would inspire millions of people and make us care more about our place in the galaxy. Thanks for sharing.
W.M. Aslam - Author fantastic isn’t it. That first zoom when I noticed the moon’s movement... spine-tingling
@@LeighDWYC Ah yes, I can still recall my first viewing of the moon's passing over the mirror of my Meade 900 reflector telescope, a real life changing moment.
alien bird
Literally 69% of the comment section: 1:44
Dovfka :D 69 *nice*
1:44 you see this all the time using high magnification on the moon. It's just satellites. you should see it when the moon is strait azimuth, so many black dots zooming through the FOV.
That’s totally amazing . . It still sits where God placed it . . . What an amazing Creator . . Genesis 1:1
0:12 looks like empanadas
🤣🤣
340 aliens disliked this video
You're blind it's more than 400 dislikes
Very nice
Its actually 2,500 of them occupying the other side of the Moon. W Percival
IDIOTA ÚTIL.
@@issac3100 😂😂😂
Fantastic footage
yeah, spectacular, thank you much @vidmix for sharing that !
Have you seen the crossing object? about 1.45 minutes
+MIGUEL CORTES ROMAN Yeah!
+MIGUEL CORTES ROMAN It was E.T. on his bike but I couldnt see if Elliot was on it too.
no... :D lol
You're right, something flashed by, flew by, it was more like an object, a familiar thing on the moon, what do you think?
Wth was that?
Great job! Love the sepia color and the atmospheric turbulence within the footage that keeps it all realistic of what the eye sees threw a telescope.
Where is the american flag?
in America.
Carlos Bonilla There is no America or American flag, you might wanted to say United States flag
Carlos Bonilla
On the White House
In our heads
on the moon
Transformer optimus prime just crossed at 1:44
👍😂😜
Wonder woman
Awesome moon shot! What setting used? ISO, F stop, speed? When is the video using the 600 mm max zoom on the lens?
ok watch 2.40 from left to right from the mid bottom of the screen and tell me what I saw ????
if it was a bird it would of blacked out all of the shot of the moon....
just a dark shadow but was going at some rate.
sorry 1.45
There's a ton of debris and rocks orbiting Earth.
these rocks are not that big. Satellites i think
ya i see too
I saw it . strange
It's really hard to say if that's a bird at 1:44 because the shadow is being cast on the moon surface you can even see the shadow change shape depending on the elevation of the surface. If it's an artificial satellite, do we have a satellite orbiting the moon? Cause it could simply be the shadow of that.
Please shoot India's Chandrayan spaceship; superb photography!
Better images than Apollo ever produced. And they were really close. They say.
@ Fredrik Montelius: Your comment suggests that either you're daft or clueless. Which is it?
I would replace "Apollo" with "Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter".
@@madcityobserver6294 He just never has seen any Apollo picture...
at 1:45 something flies through the shot..
William Mignoli satellite transit. See them all the time. Fast and small.
probably a bird.
John theux a bird at that magnification would be huge
1:44 - 1:45
Eu ví tambem ;)
i don't know what that thing is at 1:41 but i love that so many people noticed it without this being a '"did you see that ? what could that be" ? many of us notice things like this because we ARE looking for something
1:44
Its a bird passing in front of the camera teslescope thing
Hands down the best moon close up I've seen...and i seen a lot!
0:50 Do you see that hidden alien face at the mid-bottom of the screen with his face expression saying "OH, will he notice me?? Sh..dont move"
Duration 1:44 "International Space Station Crossed by your lense."
You are lucky to capture it
It’s a ufo
🛸
The color of the moon is not miserable gray. The soil of the moon is colored (multi-colored), with a predominance, on average, of a brown color.
I think that's the refraction of the atmosphere that makes it look brownish
@@awesomefacepalm No, the blue atmosphere of Earth makes it look LESS brownish. The Moon is MORE brownish from open space
@@ВалентинКомаровский oh I see.
Thanks for pointing that out
Is that the final layer we can see into? Some areas of the moon are supposed to be much deeper, like several miles, are we able to see the difference in depth? Very nice shots
Amazing.Which camera you use for this video?
Is this 500x just a telescope or some kind of camera?. If its a camera what model is it? OMG i loved this wonderful view. Thanks
1:43 lol did you see the light? After that disappeard.Like this thing knew someone is watching on his side
En todos los videos si mira cm si estuviera a dentro del agua por sus ondas que hace jejejeje o todo es holografico ......somos solo gente caricatura xe
Where is the moon lem and the flag US 🤔 ? The Jeep, etc... ? i don't see ?
Odji Ramirez you can’t see it, mostly because it isn’t by the craters and it is literally like looking for a penny with a telescope from Florida to New York
great video! I had to come back and watch again
Before I die at least I saw the moon closer thanks to that high tech telescope....
It's like there's a wave of water..
Due to refraction
@Oliver Leduc true.
Nice to meet you.
@ its all due to temperature difference in atomsphere.....which bends the light.....n it seems like waves of water.....optics bro...
Atmospheric shimmering
Que sombra é esta que passa em 1:44?
+Juan Domingo Quintian Olá Juan.
Você enviou o seu recado para a pessoa errada.
Rsrsrsrs ! ...
o meu comentário foi outro.
+Juan Domingo Quintian Não sei, meu querido!...
Sinto por desapontá-lo!...
É a sua peruca que foi levada por um vendaval...
Un mosquito
Gutenberg Gomes tive a impressão de ser a ISS, mas não posso afirmar nada assistindo de uma tela dr celular. Quando chegar em casa eu vejo direito.
Im really no sure what is that near 1:44 ... If it was a bird or something from Earth, it should go a lot more faster because the big camera zoon..
Yes you are right one more thing the shadow is sharper and smaller.that means its not near camera.its a fall off shadow in moon itself might be the shadow of some satellite orbitting moon.and its very near moon.
@@SKDreamcatcher totally agreed
Can you guys believe that if somehow somone where on there and you had a conversation with that person you will be seeing that person 1 second in the past? Because of the light speed
nice video good and close how many lens do you have on there ? I only have one and I can get just as close the Nikon P1000 is a beast . nice work brother keep it up.
Really nice, Impressive video of our Moon :)
croww777 would like these 😊
the moon looks so close, this is seen from the clear detail. while according to science the moon is 385,000 km from the earth. Is it true?
Its far away but very big. It is a bit hard to understand scale especially from a human perspective. Its like zooming to Africa from 384.000 km. You would definetely catch detail.
If we can see moon with naked eye imagine what camera with this zoom can see
Charged Couple Devices works just like our LRD "Light Receiving Diodes" or LRRD "Light Receiving Receiver Diodes" in our military satellites. CCDs in digital cameras and telescopes or zoom lens cameras works just our LRD and LRRD systems. Our LRD and LRRD systems works essentially like a normal eye retina that receives light and automatically display/record it as a still and/or moving picture. I believe I better take a refreasher engineering course to re-remember my college lessons and to keep abrest with certain overlooked technologies since I have been busy with the machine tool department as an occasional adviser from time to time.
The moon is a reflection of Earth from the past!!!!!
at 1.44 seconds, there was something crossed from right to left, may be satellite.
1:44, not 1.44!
1:44
Solve this MYSTERY ADMIN!
Satelite, space debre
Ghost maybe
Agora sei porque não voltaram a lua,o cara tem uma câmera que dá pra ver tudo!!! Que top rs
Em revolucionários 144p de resolução, vi até uns aliens ali
1:42 is where an earth based BIRD flies by......you can tell by its speed
You forgot one tiny, little bit of information. What camera did you use?
entre los minuto 1:44 y 1:45, hay una extraña imagen que pasa desde arriba hasta abajo en el lado inferior izquierdo
É impressão minha ou passou uma sombra de algo voando? Confiram vocês mesmos em 1minuto e 45 segundos.
Eu tbm vi
Zoom in the space stations 😂
Nice!! 😂😂 I would love to see that
Is it possible to buy such equipment?
Wow.. Nice job.. Best ever. Moon video... Perhaps you can use the Same equipment to film the horizon... I mean a sunset and see if the curvature of the world would hide buildings or big ships...
Fer Ch you can see the curvature of the earth hiding part of the moon every time it rises or sets with your naked eyes. A telescope would produce a higher resolution at a higher magnification.
@@IBHunter I see the opposite of what you see, perhaps a good lens and camera can proof me wrong... Just want the truth.
Fer Ch I don’t understand, you do not see the moon disappearing behind the horizon everyday?
I have a DSLR with some decent lenses, and a telescope with focal reducers and Barlow lenses (9130mm fl) that I use on my channel. Is there anything in particular you are looking for?
@@IBHunter there is no clear skies in Lima, ever... 😕
But, I am looking for a picture or video that shows earth is flat, or if it shows curvature like it should... Thanks
Fer Ch you are not kidding! You really have clouds all the time! I checked out the weather there! I am not home now, but I do have a picture I took at the the beach in Galveston Texas last year. All I had at the time was a 16-55 mm kit lens with very little magnification, but you could easily see the ships obstructed by the horizon with your naked eyes! This picture has 7 large ships in it at different distances away.
drive.google.com/file/d/1WO91FvwhHRpgOpVEtityy442rZz_0FIt/view?usp=drivesdk
I have worked for a survey company that specialized in marine navigation. If the earth was flat, or job would have been so much easier, but in order for measurements to come out correctly, they had to be based on a WGS84 geoid.
If you have at least a couple of clear nights in a year, I have a suggestion you can do yourself with almost any camera.
Moon it's strong enough to reflect light on clouds but week enough to iluminate actornauts on moon
Looks like one enormous living sponge to me. That would explain the blood moons. Awesome.
BIRDS DONT FLY PAST THE MOON
Of course they do. Birds, bats and insects fly between you and the moon all the time. A zoom or a telescope won't make you "closer" to the moon, they will just make it look bigger. So the birds and bugs that fly a few meters over you can still be seen in your eyepiece.
Im dead
How nasa landed on such surface
Easy : They simply picked clear landing sites.
The photograph we see here does not make the Moon's size justice : Even those little craters we see near the end of the video are huge, dozens of km across. So you can find plenty of flat surfaces to land a 4m module on if you chose your landing site carefully, and if you have a pilot able to make last second adjustments to pick the best patch in the selected area.
Stil pretty impressive, though. Breaking a landing gear (or anything else) on a rock at touchdown would have meant no return trip, and a pair of corpses on the Moon instead of a flag.
nobody: What a good quality
me: it is actually out of this world
NASA could have saved money if they had used this zoom lens instead of going to the moon🤣🤣 jst kdng
If you laugh you sub! yes NASA did not go to the moon. . the astronauts went to the moon
Ok
No 1:44 was not a UFO or any of that stupid shit. It was a bird.
+I_am_Potato_ I don't know what it was but I'm sure it was not a bird flying in the night at that altitude (at that zoom - a bird would cover the entire image for a short period of time). Maybe some kind of space rock, satellite or yes, a UFO.
+VidMix asteroid, not very likely, UFO, never, there fake, unless your by Area 51, then it could be a blackbird plane.
+I_am_Potato_ how do you know you basturd?
+VidMix I'd vote for the shadow of a satellite, maybe ISS. It comes out of earth's shadow, it's orbiting earth. Lucky shot with that zoom I'd say. : )
+I_am_Potato_ try a molecule
ахуенный зум!
axye kll/lmbbM!
Yep
Ninguém vai dizer que é água no firmamento fazendo a imagem tremer?
Então quer dizer que a Lua tmbm está fora do Domo,nunca tinha visto da Lua,só das estrelas fora do Domo com águas a frente
The water makes the moon wavey.
Fabulous zoom... Goods... Moon in zooming
good because I want to see the American flag that you put on the moon and they're better still there if somebody took it away from there want you to find out who took it and ask them to put it back
Jose Mendez also, get this: with technology this powerful, you should just be able to aim anywhere and zoom until a "satellite" becomes visible, but does anyone ever do that? nope!
because they're not up there. they don't exist.
Jose Mendez bruh... a flag is tiny, a crater is probably MILES big do you really think you can see it with that little zoom?
Age of Reason they are spaced out pretty far... I don't think you can see a mailbox that is thousands of miles far
Google does it, "supposedly"
In fact satellites do not exist nor does imaging from space like google creating maps from pictures from outer space.
Huawei P 100 😁
1,44 minutos passa uma sombra voando na lua. como se fosse um ovni.
provavelmente um satelite pelo tamanho e velocidade, mas pode ser um passaro tmb...
No Holagram here. Nice vid.
Fantastic zoom
First time I could see the moon so near
OMG you can see Chuck Norris training on the moon. But on a serious note, with all the people all over the world looking at the moon closely, why doesn't anyone capture any impacts or plumes of impacts on the moon. I mean holy crap it's been nailed more times than any porn star in history ya think someone would catch a hit.
yep born, we are only provided with some retarded very poor quality pics of a Esa/Nasa (who cares) "probe" crashing into the moon's surface, and the video and pics from Esa/Nasa (who cares) are of an unbelievable poor quality.... they just can't be true if you compare with the details an amature can present with some high end camera.... strange for sure, suspiscious at least...
I agree. something smells. I mean just on youtube you have people that can basically look at the moon from 3000 feet or better and nobody see's any meteoric strikes. Then there's the guys with mini Hubble telescopes in their yard who can count every hole. And what makes it even stranger is the moon has no atmosphere to protect the surface from......well, anything so why no once in a while mile high dust plume and tomorrow.....BINGO a new giant hole.
"why doesn't anyone capture any impacts or plumes of impacts on the moon." - You mean like these?:
ruclips.net/video/PCwzWTea4yE/видео.html
ummmmmmm I not seeing any live impacts during this video. Sure I see a shit ton of holes. but nothing dramatic like say even something the size of a bowling ball slamming into the surface at 17,000 mph that would leave a very significant hole and plume of dust I'd say. please time stamp it where you think you see a impacter.
born68 - Nice how, when shown wrong, you change your argument from 'no one's captured any impacts' to 'no live impacts in this video clip'. Impacts large enough to be seen from earth, even with a high-powered telescope, are rare, so picking one up in a less than 3 minute video clip is highly unlikely.
2:29 E pq os relevos que foram as sobras está ao contrário
Não entendi a sua frase kkkk
Zoom in on the Rover we left behind or show us one of them 4 flags we left That's what i thought we never went to the moon or someone would of spotted them by now.
Even with the most powerful telescopes on Earth all you can see is a dot. Don't show your unintelligence because you don't understand how far away stuff is. If you think we can see that stuff with a freaking DSLR you're really stretching it.
Carmen Xero they can scope a 100000000000billion lightyears from earth, then they cant post an update whats happen to the flag around the moon?? OMG sorry for my bad english
Genius Intelligence exactly. these official version shills always say they're too far away to see, while others actually say other Apollo "missions" brought everything back. they can't get their stories straight because none of them know what they're talking about.
This same technology however. could adequately show vehicles, houses and streets on an aerial view of earth's landscapes.
no signs of mankind on the moon.
also, get this: with technology this powerful, you should just be able to aim anywhere and zoom until a "satellite" becomes visible, but does anyone ever do that? nope!
because they're not up there. they don't exist.
@Age of Reason and @Genious Intelligence, PLEASE first read up on how optical resolution works and then come back and show us how you are going to resolve 2m on the moon from Earth with any optics in existence right now! People like you always feel confident enough to use computers to make bold statements. Yet they don't even grasp the basics of optics that determined the smallest features in their PCs CPU and also limits what you can see from Earth with available instrumentation. It is physicists and engineers like me, who always have to wonder how people with obviously so little understanding of the subject can feel competent enough to make such bold statements as you did. By the way: maybe also read up on the Dunning-Kruger-Effect!
What telescope were you using?
Gary McKinnon Darude - Sandstorm
FANTASTIC.... you could most see the little Green Men 😂😂😂...joking aside they were really impressive shots...Nice one 👍🏻
top !
You should be able to find the lunar lander if it is there!
No the craters you see are so fricking big you wouldnt even believe it
Why are their no angular impacts?
kind of weird..
lol.. even with the most powerful telescopes available on earth you would only see a little dot..
***** Exactly
Little Ricky'sFlyingCircus also, get this: with technology this powerful, you should just be able to aim anywhere and zoom until a "satellite" becomes visible, but does anyone ever do that? nope!
because they're not up there. they don't exist.
The Flat Earth
The ball earth
Srsly how the fuck did you get 5 likes on your stupid/troll comment?
@@fastlane005 hahahaha and u got (0) likes
@@fastlane005 and 2 dislikes
*Very cool. I bought a camera and brought the car closer, which made the license plate visible from a distance of 1.22 km*
That is GORGEOUS work! I am SO jealous lol but at least you are sharing this beautiful visual display so I am not so jealous bahaha Thank you for sharing 👍🏻
1.43 min ves un objeto volando
Can you show as te american FLAG on the moon ?
why the violence?
+jeeper4x4life gtfo lmao the moon landings weren't faked
www.space.com/12835-nasa-apollo-moon-landing-sites-photos-lro.html
Abbas also, get this: with technology this powerful, you should just be able to aim anywhere and zoom until a "satellite" becomes visible, but does anyone ever do that? nope!
because they're not up there. they don't exist.
+Age of Reason thanks for reply....do you mean by the last sentence that there is no flag on the moon ? i hope to have a better zoom to see more details on the moon
Observe the ripples...
nikhil teja. Observe our atmosphere and thermal waves.
Did you have a moon filter on? I am guessing yes. I use a green one on occasion to keep the brightness down. I would suggest you concentrate your viewing on the side of the moon. That in my opinion you will gain the most out of this set up. At 1:18 and at 1:42 shows beautiful side shots of the moon. Beautiful man. Thanks for the show!
Why can't I find a video of the moon through a professional telescope 100 times more powerful?
no american flag hahahahaah .
Gomez 94 united states *
Are you stupid
Tu Muy Bien h
I saw a Russian flag ops'!
You have to believe one of two things. Either a video camera can zoom in to see the surface clearly of an object traveling 2,000 mph 200,000 miles away while stand on an object spinning 1,000 mph... Or the more logical truth.
The earth has been proven to be flat. Open your eyes.
The logical truth is that the guy is using a tripod and a steady hand to aim the camera at the moon. What's not to get is beyond me.
The numbers you're spewing out are relative. Something moving 2,000 mph at 200+k miles away appears to move far slower from your point of view because it's so far away.
Ever looked outside the window of a moving car to a far object and then back again at an object closer to you? They appear to move at different rates. The same logic applies.
Harry Plinkett also, get this: with technology this powerful, you should just be able to aim anywhere and zoom until a "satellite" becomes visible, but does anyone ever do that? nope!
because they're not up there. they don't exist.
@jspr2k5...logic does not effect the mind of a flat earther... no need to try. It's about belief, not logic to them one can never prove anything to them.
open your door ----and walk to school
To John Doe: I would be surprised if I didn't find a flattard comment on such videos...
And they Say, the Moon is 384,400 km !!!! But we can see detail even through our own Eyes !!!! 384,400 yeh Right, pull the other one " It plays Jingle Bells"
jolly Jumper also, get this: with technology this powerful, you should just be able to aim anywhere and zoom until a "satellite" becomes visible, but does anyone ever do that? nope!
because they're not up there. they don't exist.
Age of Reason you do know satellites are very hard to spot?
been saying this for years! its more like 3-4,000 miles tops
DaDopeMasta
This probably won't come as a shock to you, but "advanced stupid" is becoming the new normal.
if the moon was 240,000 miles away it would have to be huge for me to see the detail that I can see on it with my own eyes but it's not that big. Also what are the odds that the moon is 400x smaller and 400x closer than the sun so it appears to be the exact same size as the sun? bullshit they're both much closer and smaller and you've been lied to. Crepuscular rays of the sun prove this through simple trigonometry
Some of the comments on here have made me lose my faith in humanity...
Good video and clear sky
Fake photo CGI
RIGHT!
Zooming on moon
Zoomer : am i joke to you
Great video - The magnification and resolution calls for adaptive optics!
What is 500x zoom? What equipment did you use?
It's not all optical zoom, major part of the video is with digital zoom.
3 x 2x converters...wow! great clip, well done
Definitely we are seeing moon thru the water.
Yup that means that sky is full of water and there is no space
@@lifegoeson877 there is space, above the water
If you find the Vikram Lander & Rover sent by ISRO,then you are a legend 🎉
Close enough to see the moon moving
I can see Indian flag on the moon