【精華版】蘇麻離青學問太深了!青花瓷真偽這樣判斷!

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 16 янв 2025

Комментарии • 18

  • @嘉豪黃-d7y
    @嘉豪黃-d7y Год назад

    勵害.曾教授

  • @joanleou6845
    @joanleou6845 2 года назад +1

    蘇料,嵌入胎骨的鐵鏽斑(錫光斑)高鐵低錳 藍中帶黑

  • @嘉豪黃-d7y
    @嘉豪黃-d7y Год назад

    曾教授我要去鑑定瓶子.要怎樣連絡

  • @x-feng
    @x-feng Год назад

    黑斑中间有些会有紫红或者暗红色结晶斑,虽然你的那件的确是仿品。

  • @nasa168168
    @nasa168168 4 месяца назад +1

    鈷含量太高,暈散太過就被當廢品打碎掩埋。

  • @嘉豪黃-d7y
    @嘉豪黃-d7y Год назад

    蘇麻離青.有其他色嗎

  • @menghungtsai5343
    @menghungtsai5343 2 года назад

    茶杯好美

  • @嘉豪黃-d7y
    @嘉豪黃-d7y Год назад

    我知道字裹秘訣

  • @lulingw3999
    @lulingw3999 2 года назад +2

    假模假樣的還帶雙手套,不知道拿瓷器不能帶手套嗎?太滑,這不是書畫。誤導觀眾。😅😅😅

  • @เสฐียรนิลเพ็ง

    因为真品多数人没有机会看到上手过,所以仿的人完全没法仿出高水准的作品

  • @張文武-n7q
    @張文武-n7q 2 месяца назад

    沒有大筆小筆的問題,

  • @yamk4412
    @yamk4412 7 месяцев назад

    真品釉質變得比較自然

  • @onnalannooho3293
    @onnalannooho3293 5 месяцев назад

    Sorry to call you Half Buckle Stonepert. If you do not really know the natural of SMALT you should not teach people from your wrong angle of view. You seems do not know the microscopic nature of the real black spots. Its features in Yuen dynasty and Ming dynasty are different as the source of SMALT is different. Go to buy a 50 times microscopic lens attached to your mobile phone and then to go the the TAIPEI museum to borrow the stuff to take a hand on examination. Then you may know the different. Even some specimen collected from the abandoned Kiln will miss lead you as the one on your hand coming from the abandoned kiln may just the middle Ming dynasty product not made in early Ming dynasty. Many many many Ming dynasty specimen are old but not at that age.

  • @張文武-n7q
    @張文武-n7q 2 месяца назад

    現象宇內含物,拍的不清楚,解釋也不清楚,

  • @蔡文祥-z1m
    @蔡文祥-z1m Год назад

    一派胡言、低级!台灣之悲!明代早期一筆點畫常在小器物、而蘇麻尼青發色最變化很多因為礦鈷級別的不同發色不同

  • @mosong5710
    @mosong5710 3 месяца назад

    一派胡言. Not an expert!!!