I wish she would talk more about the implications and applications on practices within the mental health industry, from diagnosis, treatment, therapy, psycho education, and research. So many of the ideas she is debunking are the foundation of mental health discourses that could be holding back the industry from improving and helping people. How fabulous would a book on that topic be! She would be in a good position to write on that topic as someone who also trained to be a clinical psychologist. If any viewers here has links or resources to this aspect of the work, please comment :)
What a pleasant, close and warm presentation!. I imagine the effort to share (in a colloquial way, close to general divulgation, and in a short time for dissertation) the extensive empirical and theoretical scientific work. Thanks for sharing, and hugs from Chile.
... did we need this lecture to realize the glass and thirsty experiment? Is neuroscience at this level of "trivial popular" knowledge? Do neuroscientists and psychologist study system and control theory before doing any expensive experiments? ... They seem to lake of those basics' notions of science and technology
47:46 Informatively, if you ask a physicist such as Chris Fields, perception causes entanglement: ruclips.net/video/aeh9bSuSNrA/видео.html I was quite surprised to see Lisa state that affect is a property of consciousness. Wasn't this more precisely Mark Solms' view? I wonder if she changed her terminology tactics somewhat after their debates. That would certainly be a positive thing.
I wish she would talk more about the implications and applications on practices within the mental health industry, from diagnosis, treatment, therapy, psycho education, and research. So many of the ideas she is debunking are the foundation of mental health discourses that could be holding back the industry from improving and helping people. How fabulous would a book on that topic be! She would be in a good position to write on that topic as someone who also trained to be a clinical psychologist. If any viewers here has links or resources to this aspect of the work, please comment :)
One of the best talk-series I've ever heard. Thank you!
What a pleasant, close and warm presentation!. I imagine the effort to share (in a colloquial way, close to general divulgation, and in a short time for dissertation) the extensive empirical and theoretical scientific work. Thanks for sharing, and hugs from Chile.
So exciting. May your depts fame proceed and I be able to claim I heard this today 20 June 2024
Good morning & afternoon. Interesting lecture .
... did we need this lecture to realize the glass and thirsty experiment? Is neuroscience at this level of "trivial popular" knowledge? Do neuroscientists and psychologist study system and control theory before doing any expensive experiments? ... They seem to lake of those basics' notions of science and technology
47:46 Informatively, if you ask a physicist such as Chris Fields, perception causes entanglement: ruclips.net/video/aeh9bSuSNrA/видео.html
I was quite surprised to see Lisa state that affect is a property of consciousness. Wasn't this more precisely Mark Solms' view? I wonder if she changed her terminology tactics somewhat after their debates. That would certainly be a positive thing.
It was already her view before 2017 because she writes about it in her book How emotions are made.
@@babooshka7601 Interesting, thanks. She gave me more of an illusionist type of vibe but maybe I was wrong.
to lack