Keynote "Artificial Intelligence: Where are we at and where are we heading?"

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 22 мар 2017
  • CeBIT Global Conferences - 23 March 2017: Keynote "Artificial Intelligence: Where are we at and where are we heading?" / Prof. Dr. Christian Bauckhage, Fraunhofer-Institut für Intelligente Analyse- und Informationssysteme IAIS, Germany
    bit.ly/2nqZrDv
  • НаукаНаука

Комментарии • 41

  •  5 лет назад

    In time 18:55 - It is not Miro style, it is Kandinsky.

  • @hakusansaku8800
    @hakusansaku8800 7 лет назад +2

    So now every company on the planet will hire people who can use TensorFlow, etc. ? To gain an edge?
    Even though AI software is open source, you still need several millions - billions to facilitate that power. As he also said that you need access to big data and to high performance computing.

    • @kadabra8268
      @kadabra8268 4 года назад

      right black hat hackers will love ai tec, like you said the cost to power that is un real

  •  7 лет назад +2

    but, what is left for us to do? what is not a process? hm....

  • @UserName________
    @UserName________ 7 лет назад +2

    Nothing is impossible.

    • @Brainbuster
      @Brainbuster 7 лет назад +3

      A round square is impossible.

    • @Brainbuster
      @Brainbuster 4 года назад

      @@heribertojuarez6046 Maybe one day you'll find a round square if you keep believing.

  • @SoCalFreelance
    @SoCalFreelance 7 лет назад +2

    Yes, AI has made tremendous gains, however you show a computer a picture and it can't figure out what it's looking at. So still much progress needs to be made before AI can understand its environment.

    • @seonteeaika
      @seonteeaika 7 лет назад +2

      The systems are getting better still, but AI has been better than humans at image recognition for over 2 years now. Look up article from feb 2015 with google term: "Microsoft, Google Beat Humans at Image Recognition".
      I think the reason humans can make errors is because they don't know names for all different types of plants and animals, that's where they will lose to a computer at the very least.

    • @SoCalFreelance
      @SoCalFreelance 7 лет назад +1

      While I would agree the use of hundreds of thousands of internet based images to conduct pattern matching (as seen in ImageNet Challenge) is a positive step, ultimately an AI needs orders of magnitude more computational power to truly understand what's happening in the picture or video beyond just object recognition.

    • @artemkovera5785
      @artemkovera5785 7 лет назад +1

      Hello. if you're interested in artificial intelligence, you can check out my ebook “HOW TO CREATE MACHINE SUPERINTELLIGENCE”. This e-book is available for FREE in Amazon Kindle Store until 2 April 2017.
      It includes the following topics:
      Intelligence as information-processing system
      Classical and quantum computations
      Artificial Intelligence and Machine learning
      Artificial Neural networks

  • @MonaGee98
    @MonaGee98 6 лет назад +1

    When the Speaker shown the chart of History of Technology and said the history of human kind, Asia and Asians are no where to be seen. What credibility does the speaker has?

  • @orca2162
    @orca2162 3 года назад

    The host is out of touch?

  • @entyropy3262
    @entyropy3262 7 лет назад

    12:57 "teached" probably the most common german mistake I tend to do myself aswell :D

    • @bernios3446
      @bernios3446 6 лет назад

      I understand: "I teach the students...." - he seems to use the present tense. He sounds good enough to use "taught".

    • @rubenontiveros6516
      @rubenontiveros6516 6 лет назад

      Enty Ropy ,

    • @christopherdiedrich40
      @christopherdiedrich40 5 лет назад

      @@bernios3446 I think you ought not to be taught, lest it has been brought up before.
      Do you know what I mean?

  • @i.C.Infinity
    @i.C.Infinity 7 лет назад +1

    It's really funny that at the beginning of his talk he said people can't get a grip on the exponential growth curve, then he finished with a prediction that totally ignored the exponential growth curve.

    • @brodrock
      @brodrock 7 лет назад +2

      Not ignored actually. The chart is designed with an exponential Y-scale so the advancing straight line actually represents exponential increase.

    • @i.C.Infinity
      @i.C.Infinity 7 лет назад

      In that case I stand corrected. Even though i'm not going back to look for it.

    • @Brainbuster
      @Brainbuster 7 лет назад

      You should've marked the time in your first comment.

    • @maxsvensons4438
      @maxsvensons4438 7 лет назад

      Just look for rice on a chessboard story. It says it all. But take in consideration that the chessboard ends after 64 fields, but does the development do so? We just can't get in and most people aren't even aware of the problem or do not see where this leads. We are still living in the past and not adopting. Very dangerous.

    • @tottisempre
      @tottisempre 6 лет назад

      If you paste these values in Excel and add a scatter chart you will see it is exponential:
      2016 1.00E+09
      2018 1.00E+10
      2020 1.00E+11
      2022 1.00E+12
      2024 1.00E+13
      2026 1.00E+14
      2028 1.00E+15
      2030 1.00E+16

  • @rhondamay1772
    @rhondamay1772 6 лет назад

    #FakeLeftIsAltRight ;-)