NEW VS OLD CAR CRASH TESTING! - BeamNG Drive
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 29 сен 2024
- Join the OFFICIAL Neilogical Discord - / discord
So this video is based on a test the IIHS conducted in which the crash tested a 2009 Chevy Malibu and a 1959 Bel Air. The test showed just how much automotive safety has improved. Will the results be the same in Beamng?!
Video mentioned - • Crash Test 1959 Chevro...
Subscribe my dude! - bit.ly/2tPfyLv
Muh Twitter - / neilogical_
Watch me Stream! - / neilogical_
---------------------------------------------------------
Intro/End Card Music:
Track: Jordan Schor - Cosmic (feat. Nathan Brumley) [NCS Release]
Music Curtesy of NoCopyrightSounds
Check Out the Video! - • Jordan Schor - Cosmic ...
Support the Artist! (FREE DOWNLOAD) - ncs.io/CosmicID
Hey guys, how's it going? My name is Neil and I love anything were I get to smash, crash, explode or destroy stuff. I love playing automotive games such as BEAMNG Drive, Next Car Game Wreckfest, Burnout, Need for Speed, and many more. I try my best to upload at least once a day, sometimes two. I hope you find something here you enjoy, and I thank you for checking me out! Peace!
>60mph head-on collision
"You might have mild concussion after that"
@TyzGamin yep
Airbags
I have watched that crash test a million times! But it’s a good video!
BMW paying BeamNG for them safety features, eh? :P
Yay a discord!
well id say if the burnside had seat belts it have beaten the sunburst in this video every time
The year for the sunburst is 2012 I think and the ETK is 2016
That particular Caprice is actually a 1977.
The burnside has bench seats. You wouldn't be ok in that thing if you had a head on crash. It would be very bad for you. Especially since it doesn't have seatbelts, or at least if it did then they would be those crappy waist belts.
im late but the invite link doesnt work for the discord
Cool vid but covet doesn’t like like 50s car more like 90s
3:52 OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOFFFFFFFF
I personally think u have a better chance of living in older cars just bc of their brutal weight compared to something like a Honda Civic
nah, in an older car the airbags are shitty, seatbelts are questionable, and in even older cars, you dont even have those, just a chromed up steel steering wheel geady to give you a kiss in a crash, if you dont get to be a human cannonball from the windshield
2017 Honda Civic vs. 1906 Ford Model T. Who would survive????
@TEROKish of course cause cars weren't mass produced in 1900 compared to 1930. And also cars in 1930s are newer than "1900" cars.
Older car are better as in strength but lacks proper safety features ie air bags front and the side
That was a 120 mile an hour crash. You would be dead from impact
old cars are built better then new cars
awesome gamer 1983 ruclips.net/video/fPF4fBGNK0U/видео.html you sure about that?
@@marcd7332 this test was rigged and was using a weak x frame which called unsafe then either
Be my daddy neil
:)
Fakey Antek fruity as heck
Ooh yea
Fakey Antek i can be your daddy
Unknown Gamer can you be mine
I love old cars they look so nice like this if you love 40s to 60s cars
30-60s look so nice new cars look ugly
I prefer the 19th C Mustang Mach 1
Older cars do look really nice😀😀
@@kielbasathief9576 goki stop insulating newer cars, and older cars are equal to newer cars
this is why i am gonna learn how to make cars look old but there very advanced
Aren't newer cars supposed to crush to absorb the impact?
yes, volvo invented the "crush zone" in 1956
Creativity Isn't that’s why they aren’t made of invincible metals now
Gay? Okay! its crumple zone not "crush" zone
ThvtRvndomGuy
But Volvo called it the crush zone.
wasnt it mercedes benz who invented the crumple zone?
It’s sad that so many think that old cars are „safer“ and „stronger“ than new cars. Did anyone watch crashtests? You should... you clearly see the difference!
Leon G yeah, it’s not sad to me, it just tells me they are idiots
Because they are
@@Chicory-Cat69 says you dumbass
Actually that video show how much AN engine block improves structure
You do know that when they invented cars in the 1890s they didn't have any seatbelts and until the 1970s that was when they FINALLY added a seatbelt
Less damage to the car isnt equal to a safer car.. The Burnside doesnt have airbags and in best case it will only have lapbelts and i dont think that the steering column is built to break in half. You'd pretty much have a steering wheel through your face in the end
body mass matters because the more weight and things on absorb the shock of it so it wouldn't be really fair
You should put the old pessima against the modern pessima.
Be it unsafe, I still perfer 1950's cars over cars from now.
The way to have cars continuously driving forward or backwards on keyboard is to press w (key bind for throttle) hold, then press tab to a different car. This may work with a setup if you hold the throttle then press tab to move to a different vehicle. Then press the throttle key to disable the perma drive
You should of gotten cars that were the same mass. Because that does play a pretty big role. A person driving an old 90s Ford 350 crashing head on into someone driving a brand new Prius is gonna be allot better of than the Prius.
Neil-You were surprised at how easily the Burnside Special caught fire. Well, duh! It’s not called the BURNside Special for nothing!! Lol
Actually, in the iihs video, the old car (Bel Air) didn't have an engine, it was just the shell of the car
GTA Nerd liar
@@Chicory-Cat69 no hes right IT WAS USING A X FRAME VERY UNSAFR EVEN IN 1959!!! I OUTTA KICK YOUR ASS
I've seen a few other 59s that folded in the exact same way. They all had engines, it's just the frame that's bad. All cars with an X Frame are like that.
It was deceivingly rusty too, plume of red dust on impact
I like how much more in a better shape the older car is... But the newer one is apparently in better condition in like 90% of these tests. Like the older vehicles are wayyyyy more durable irl
depends on speed, in newer cars the crumple zone is all in the front so you dont get a case of 'bashed to death in your car', in older cars, the crumple zone is where you and your family are eating Wendys on the way home from sunday church
Did u think about g forces, belts, and that newer cars are suppossed to break to absorb the force and Save the driver/passanger
??? fff what are you talking about idiot if it breaks it going to kill you hell cars now days you barley lay a finger on them and they fall apart
Big Bud modern cars have crumple zones designed to absorb impact while the driver/passengers are inside a tub which doesn't break. This reduces g force exerted on the occupants
i'll bet you believe the world is flat and that evolution is a myth
i meant Big Bud up there lmao
@@jamespetty5344 this doesn't help you In a 60mph head on crash. 50 is survivable but 60 not really
Shouldnt the older car be better off? Not for the driver, but just overall. The older cars I thought were built to be strong and withstand crashes, but not to protect the driver, while new cars are more safety concerned, so they crumple more to take most of the pressure of the crash. If I am right, I actually think this may be inaccurate. Correct me if I am wrong please.
Variant This is accurate in real life. Not so much in beam ng... yet..
Yes, but we have to remember that too much crumple will be bad for the driver inside, potentially crushing them inside. The newer cars still have crumple, but stops when it reaches the driver/cabin.
Variant watch this: ruclips.net/video/joMK1WZjP7g/видео.html
Or this: m.imgur.com/K1FKoAC
Older cars didn’t have crumple zones. They faired well in slow speed crashes but anything more than say 30 mph and they crumpled fully like tin cans.
Beamng is pretty much spot on.
Kozaktri old cars are essentially tougher but the occupants inside have nothing soft to protect em. New vehicles are the opposite. You either choose occupant protection or vehicular durability ( new vs old respectively. )
Duckdude 001 not really. Those old cars aren’t designed to be crashed whereas newer ones are intricately designed by engineers to withstand crashes. Watch any old vs new car crash on RUclips and you’ll see. An old car is like running into a wall with a brick infront of you whereas a new car is like running into a wall with a pillow. Which will you prefer? Also older cars pretty much crumpled as a whole especially in the middle where the driver sits. Safety just wasn’t even a thought back then.
Who else remember the burnside as a shitass 80s sedan/coupe/wagon?
This was pretty good. Can you do a part 2 but also do some stuff like old and new cars vs a wall?
you know why that burnside is still driving because its better
Join my Discord server here! discord.gg/YvBsFP
Neilogical your 1st hahaa
Neilogical I don’t have discord :(
Hi
I like to join but I don't have the game
hyh the jydnktgjuj
The old cars in real life will end up a lot better on the outside after a crash but the new cars are more safe
Neil forgot to switch to the car limiting to 40mph in the "mode" option on the side, so the cars were faster than expected
I drove an ETK 800 at 70MPH Into a 100% solid wall and it seemed survivable
Cool video, now run a Moonhawk into a Covet and tell me new cars are safer lol.
Old Pessima vs I-Series
Someone make a song remix of him saying "bouhhh" everytime the cars smash.
make this with maluch :D
Hang a Belaz or the invisible BTR in the air by a medium-long chain swing the Belaz(or BTR) and then fly planes into this wrecking ball contraption
Covet hatchback.
-Tiny.
-Almost no weight or strength.
VS
Wagon
-Huge.
-Heavy as hell.
Seems legit.
The reason why the old ones are dangerous is bc you are making them go faster than they are supposed
My mom is roblox and my dad is brickplanet my grandma is beamng drive and my uncle is brick rigs
Neil why didn't you tell me that you worked in IIHS? XD
I love your content Neil, keep it up! :D
Take a current Mercedes vs. a Cadillac from the 50/60s. With 40mph against a wall, the Mercedes will look very bad and crumbled, the Cadillac much less. However, from the Mercedes I get out and can normally walk away, at the Cadillac there will be a few weeks hospital. Old cars are more stable, but do not absorb energy in the event of a collision.
The game doesn't follow real world physics, so none of those can be legitimately comparable to real world counterparts. A 1983 Ford f150 would survive a crash with a 2013 Ford f150 and fair a lot better off, I've been in and seen enough crashes to know. Throw a piece of metal possibly a metal thermos at the wall and see how it comes through it, then throw a plastic cup at the same wall and you'll see metal Is better and new day plastic dont hold up too well
Can you do race v normal cars
Hi Neil
Never letting people drive my cars again each time I wasn't driveing
Hey neil joined the discord! Keep up the good vids!!
USE THE STIG
excuse me I Don t believe it, I front of Brasil.
Do 2012 Mercedes - Benz E -class v.s 2012 BMW 5 Series car racing & crashing video. Please !
That not 100%true because older cars are made of iron new cars are not made of iron. Edit that year caprice is made of iron.
Sunburst is a Subaru Impreza
After watching you for years I realized I forgot to subscribe.
(I hate myself)
3:19 I guess you call it
The BURNside
Neil anything above 45 miles per hour your probably dead if the car stops dead under 5 mph
Even though the older car might not fare as well as the newer car , I’d still rather be in it so I could die in a much better car.
1900's
Hey neil!
Hi Neil great video
You should deffinetly do a part 2 or a vid on crash testing cars in a realistic way 🖒
I was inspired by you to become a gamer
*Folds car in half*
"Looks like we'd be A-OK" 😂
I just downloaded the BeamNG.drive app. It’s gonna take some getting used to in order for me to be good at it. It’s very hard to steer lol
The discord server link is expired. how will i join now?
where do you get your mods from and how to download cause im new to beamng?
Do a monster truck cop car chasing a hopper
Then it'll be super cool
Why doesn't BeamNG have Multiplayer?!
6:02 According to the BeamNG wiki, the Sunburst was made from 2009-2014. Coincidentally, the SBR4 came out in 2014.
The second I saw that Neil uploaded this, I freaked like the first day of summer!
Offset crashes are where you really see the difference between old and new.
Beam ng drive with graystillplays spike strips and fidget spinners
Can anyone tell me what version that is?thanks guys
Neil, they covet is based on a 1970s car
This game your playing the is cooler than fortnite
If you do make another video of this, when setting the speed make sure you set mode to limit. Because essentially they are not holding back when they go to chase you.
classic cars were not supost to go like 80mph
Cool ive joind ur discord its my u tube user name
Can you do an episode with planes🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Blez v semi
Great entertainment tho, keep it up
I'm sorry, but am I thr only one who thinks that he couldn't really tell how bad the damage was? The older car obviously won most of the time. The sunfire no longer had a distinguishable front end, but no. "It's totally dentless and in good shape," while the older car only lost the hood and bumper but not even the fenders. How biased are you?
+Neological | the Chevy Caprice Estate Wagon is from 1977 thru 1990 in beamng drive. Very long running generation and body style. In fact Oldsmobile's version still used a carbureted 307cid V-8 in 1990.
I don't think Neil's a car guy
You should do planes crashing together
You are on my top 5 favorite RUclipsrs
I've gotta say your videos are pretty cool
Keep up the great work Neil
And this is a game so it's not always right
I joined an hour ago. Mikethegamer
Hi
Beam by multiplayer with graystillplays
4:06 Maybe a minor concussion...
OR *TWO?!*
Safer or not i prefere classic cars. I dont expect to someone in 2070 be excited to find in barn VW Golf MK5 they simply gets less specific look and starts to look the same way as other make and models....
I like how we're basing car stats off of a video game lol also had a crash in my 1990 Chevy 1500, replace my bumper and grill and left side fender cause it had a little crush on the front of it. Other girl, it totalled her car and it was a newer year model honda
I wonder how many people in the comments understand the fact that most older cars lack the structures the modern cars have; the sort of crashes that made older cars extremely vulnerable in offset collisions (no linking between front rails on older cars plus no structure ahead of the front tyre; both of which allowing for forces to be redistributed in a much safer manner), and that's not going into the non-structural passive safety systems.
in real life, if you were going to put me in these cars i'd choose the old car as its solid enough to stay intact while it utilises the modern impact technology of the new car that"s being demolished. However, if you were to crash these into a wall, the modern car would be far safer ofcourse.