Hey guys, there is so much work, stringing the rackets, filming everything, cutting the video etc ... it would be nice if you could put a little more effort into the real review. How does it really feel? Solid, hollow ... what ist the spin potential .... what is the exact power level .... how does it compare to the pro ... A little too less information density. Nevertheless thanks! Best wishes from Bremen
As someone coming from a Head Ti S6 (wayy too light) I found this really good. Tried a few rackets last night (incl this one) and this was my pick. I don't want a super heavy racket but I found the power was easy and it had plenty on control on volleys etc. The same thing you guys like, I dislike. I don't like the weight at the top as for me I find myself late on serves. I got 4 aces in a row with this. I found it very neutral but I am at a lower intermediate level.
@@F4BIO771 Now you’ve made me want to see how Mannarino got that far on tour with a FH that’s got zero footwork, absent unit turn, non-existent kinetic chain with an all-arm chronic late hit technique! 🤪
Auxetic tech is in the throat bridge, not the shoulders. This is the second time you’ve made a video stating this blatant misinformation. Do you even have any sense of pride or professionalism in your videos? Or do you do this intentionally to generate comments?
Lol. I used to expect too much as well. Look at Harry and listen to him talk. He's like a stoner when he's making these videos. He obviously did not like it when Gu made a disparaging remark about the racquet, but Gu was being honest. I gave up on Harry as a serious reviewer a long time ago. Now I just tune in to be entertained with the stupidity and the comment section is usually the highlight.
@@chuckfriebe843 Occasional mistakes are fine. However, Harry is the worst case of ignorant but assertive talking “know-it-all uncle” behaviour. Zero acknowledgements of errors as ever. Yet super sarcastic condescending manner when recounting his customers who say incorrect things. 🤷♂️🤦♂️
I’m surprised coach Gu didn’t say he’s surprised by the racket
Esse cara é muito bom. Consegue transmitir o conhecimento técnico e ainda é bem humorado.
Hey guys, there is so much work, stringing the rackets, filming everything, cutting the video etc ... it would be nice if you could put a little more effort into the real review. How does it really feel? Solid, hollow ... what ist the spin potential .... what is the exact power level .... how does it compare to the pro ...
A little too less information density. Nevertheless thanks! Best wishes from Bremen
I have the same feeling when I tried the prototype. Guess not much difference made since then.
I think Henry found his go to racket. 💥
As someone coming from a Head Ti S6 (wayy too light) I found this really good. Tried a few rackets last night (incl this one) and this was my pick. I don't want a super heavy racket but I found the power was easy and it had plenty on control on volleys etc. The same thing you guys like, I dislike. I don't like the weight at the top as for me I find myself late on serves. I got 4 aces in a row with this. I found it very neutral but I am at a lower intermediate level.
Thanks guys
So how do they all compare then - Boom vs Prince x100 vs Clash?
Head has way too many lines of racquets
"I don't wanna say it's unstable, but it's unsteady." Oh my fucking god! You just said the same thing twice..
Just tried it. feels exactly like a pure strike.
Please if you can measure the specs too
Boom… how can you make such a marketing mistake for such a good idea and product. 😔
Any chance you’ll be getting your hands on a Babolat Pure Strike VS 2022 prototype soon for a review? 😬…only seen one video so far on it.
This video isn't about that racquet. It's about the Head Boom.
VS Wilson clash 100???
This is Head's answer to Wilson Clash.
Coach Gu is correct. That racquet isn't made for the serious player at club level.
Interesting- there are 3 4.5 players I know that use this racquet.
E é super sincero também.
Man , coach gu forehand is so sweet . Meanwhile Harry’s is the most amateur lazy forehand I ever seen . Yea
It's like Mannarino's forehand, is a bit strange but isn't a lazy forehand
You should come to the club that I play at to see amateur forehand’s.
@@F4BIO771 Now you’ve made me want to see how Mannarino got that far on tour with a FH that’s got zero footwork, absent unit turn, non-existent kinetic chain with an all-arm chronic late hit technique! 🤪
Mannarinos success on his forehand side is due to him stringing his racquets 24 pounds.
Right? Lol
The "coach" segments provide little to no meaningful info about the racquets. Have to go watch other reviews.
Every 100 sq. inch racquet these guys review, "it's like a Pure Drive"...
Yeah, thats true ;)
.... or like a Pro Staff 100 ;)
First!! 😂😃😃
I don't watch his reviews anymore!
Auxetic tech is in the throat bridge, not the shoulders. This is the second time you’ve made a video stating this blatant misinformation. Do you even have any sense of pride or professionalism in your videos? Or do you do this intentionally to generate comments?
Lol. I used to expect too much as well. Look at Harry and listen to him talk. He's like a stoner when he's making these videos. He obviously did not like it when Gu made a disparaging remark about the racquet, but Gu was being honest. I gave up on Harry as a serious reviewer a long time ago. Now I just tune in to be entertained with the stupidity and the comment section is usually the highlight.
@@chuckfriebe843 Occasional mistakes are fine. However, Harry is the worst case of ignorant but assertive talking “know-it-all uncle” behaviour. Zero acknowledgements of errors as ever. Yet super sarcastic condescending manner when recounting his customers who say incorrect things. 🤷♂️🤦♂️
@@jerome_morrow I don’t disagree.