The Truth About Tariffs

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 31 янв 2025
  • 🔒Remove your personal information from the web at joindeleteme.c... and use code MRBEAT for 20% off 🙌 DeleteMe international Plans: international....
    Mr. Beat explains tariffs. Tariffs aren't usually good.
    Uh ok, so this is, like, the description of the video so keep reading. Produced by Matt Beat. Filmed by Matt Beat. Additional images used under fair use guidelines or found in the public domain. Music by Geographer, NEFFEX, Bad Snacks, and Sync Royalty.
    Related videos:
    • Every Recession and De...
    • What Really Caused the...
    • Every Type of Tax Expl...
    Here's an annotated script with footnotes: docs.google.co...
    Sources/further reading:
    dornsife.usc.e...
    The Tariff History of the United States by F.W. Taussig
    Download a free copy here: cdn.mises.org/...
    www.econlib.or...
    en.wikipedia.o...
    www.forbes.com...
    news.law.fordh...
    From the American System to Mass Production, 1800-1932 by David A Hounshell
    Purchase here: amzn.to/3F2RU3C
    #ushistory #tariffs #economics
    Join this channel to get access to perks:
    / @iammrbeat
    For business inquiries or to send snail mail to Mr. Beat:
    www.iammrbeat....
    / iammrbeat
    How to support and donate to my channel:
    Subscribe to @iammrbeat & hit the notification bell 🔔
    Join for great perks on Patreon: / iammrbeat
    Donate to Mr. Beat on Paypal: www.paypal.me/...
    Buy Mr. Beat a coffee: ko-fi.com/iamm...
    Cameo: www.cameo.com/...
    Subscribe to my second channel: The Beat Goes On
    Patreon for The Beat Goes On: / thebeatgoeson
    Connect with me:
    Links: linktr.ee/iamm...
    Website: www.iammrbeat....
    Podcast: anchor.fm/theb...
    Reddit: / mrbeat
    @beatmastermatt on Twitter: / beatmastermatt
    Facebook: / iammrbeat
    Instagram: / iammrbeat
    Beatcord: / discord
    TikTok: / iammrbeat
    Merch:
    matt-beat-shop...
    www.bonfire.co...
    sfsf.shop/supp...
    amzn.to/3fdakiZ
    Affiliate Links:
    Useful Charts: usefulcharts.c...
    Fourthwall: link.fourthwal...
    StreamYard: streamyard.com...
    But I could be wrong about tariffs. Let me know down below if you think tariffs are tubular. Thank you to all of my Patreon supporters and channel members. One perk ya get if you donate $15 or more a month to my channel is a monthly shout out, and now it’s time for that, eh? Starting with my biggest donors and reverse alphabetically, thank you to Trevon Jones, Sean Conant, Robert Kandell, Psycho, Patrick Steward, Pat Iapicca, Nik Everett, Nicolas Dronsky, NeoR14, Michael Cortez, Joe Cook, Jesus Carillo, Jeremy Dunham, Isaiah Warfield, Isabelle, HistoryNerd, Fletch Fick, emptymachine, Derek Williams, Corey Rieman, Chums McGuffey, Austin Siros, Anthony Beckett, Andrew B., Alvino V, Alicia Solberg, Zachary F Parker, Victor McClean, Ty Marwitz, Thomas Oppenheim, T C, Steve Bryan, Stacey, Salty, Raquell Jones, Ralph, Oliver E., Navincitron, Naterade, Michael Schillo, Michael Burt, Justin Love, Joshua Jackson, Jennifer, Jakob Birnbaum, Jack L, Erik Hernandez, Erik Davey, Emily Glover-Wilson, Elias Pierce, Andrew Schneider, Aditya Anand, and Adam Christians. Hey thanks to ALL my Patreon supporters, and thank YOU for being curious.

Комментарии • 2,5 тыс.

  • @iammrbeat
    @iammrbeat  Месяц назад +337

    Video begins to get real at 16:50
    Please consider supporting the sponsor of this video. Sponsors, Patreon supporters and channel members help keep this channel going when RUclips demonetizes my videos. I cannot thank them enough.
    This video's sponsor is DeleteMe? Why yes it is.
    🔒Remove your personal information from the web at joindeleteme.com/MRBEAT and use code MRBEAT for 20% off 🙌 DeleteMe international Plans: international.joindeleteme.com

    • @MemeSource.
      @MemeSource. Месяц назад +6

      Real

    • @jaguarmemez
      @jaguarmemez Месяц назад +5

      Damn your 43 and Drew is 32, wow time does fly

    • @jaguarmemez
      @jaguarmemez Месяц назад +9

      You should make a video about Luigi and how the American health care system has lead to this moment of backlash and how this isn’t the solution but instead how we can solve this through legislation

    • @mrcat5508
      @mrcat5508 Месяц назад +4

      @@jaguarmemezyeah I agree

    • @LucasForde
      @LucasForde Месяц назад +3

      This video proves the president can have the power to make economy bad. If Herbert Hoover vetoed smoot-hawley Great Depression wouldn’t been so bad. People forget that congress doesn’t override presidents veto often( except Andrew Johnson).

  • @johnchessant3012
    @johnchessant3012 Месяц назад +2663

    Regardless of how you feel about tariffs, it sucks that lots of people searched "what are tariffs" only after the election. Like seriously, if you can't be bothered to take 30 minutes to learn about the defining issues of the election, then please do everyone (including you) a favor and don't vote. But at the same time, I have to imagine if our campaigns and news media were less spectacle-driven (and if the average person weren't already so stressed from trying to stay financially afloat), this would be less of an issue.

    • @iammrbeat
      @iammrbeat  Месяц назад +1176

      Especially since Trump wouldn't shut up about raising tariffs. His supporters often just blindly support his ideas without questioning him.

    • @jackmccombie102
      @jackmccombie102 Месяц назад +241

      @@iammrbeatwhat's that saying, if you repeat a lie enough times, people will believe it to be true

    • @tylerwhaley4872
      @tylerwhaley4872 Месяц назад +57

      @@iammrbeat acting as if supporters of other candidates don't also blindly support ideas without question

    • @scpatl4now
      @scpatl4now Месяц назад +185

      Well, they are about to get the government they voted for. I hope they like it. Of course if they don't, they will blame someone else.

    • @GunterBummer
      @GunterBummer Месяц назад +166

      ​@@scpatl4now except his fans are going to blame everyone except their dear donny

  • @JSythe
    @JSythe Месяц назад +2192

    This video will be watched alot through the next 4 years.

    • @Tcrror
      @Tcrror Месяц назад +207

      @@JSythe And not understood by the people that need to understand it.

    • @iammrbeat
      @iammrbeat  Месяц назад +422

      By golly I hope so

    • @JayYoung-ro3vu
      @JayYoung-ro3vu Месяц назад

      Hopefully so. Unfortunately, a certain percentage of MAGARepublicans will continue to "guzzle the 'kool-aid'." The rest will see that they were duped and begin researching to hear the other side's voices.

    • @jacobquackenbush2981
      @jacobquackenbush2981 Месяц назад +1

      @@Tcrrorsad, They will just call Mr. Beat a radical left lunatic with pretty much no basis

    • @slowmoe1686
      @slowmoe1686 Месяц назад +25

      Won't it be longer than that? This issue might not be going away, the video might still be watched 20 years from now.

  • @CallMeAWeeb
    @CallMeAWeeb Месяц назад +1357

    Mr Beat low-key being one of the best channels once again by just telling things how it is with a sense of humor

    • @iammrbeat
      @iammrbeat  Месяц назад +110

      I'm glad you get my sense of humor. lol

    • @HypervioletGeometryDash
      @HypervioletGeometryDash Месяц назад +7

      His sense of humour is rather unique but I love it

    • @eliplayz22
      @eliplayz22 Месяц назад +5

      Not just low-key, he IS one of the best channels

    • @eliplayz22
      @eliplayz22 Месяц назад

      @@HypervioletGeometryDashYeah, I love his humor

    • @oliparkhouse
      @oliparkhouse Месяц назад +6

      ​@@eliplayz22I'm gonna be that guy.
      Saying "lowkey" doesn't detract from a compliment. In this case it means Mr Beat is one of the best and that's undervalued, and/or Mr Beat is humble rather than braggy.
      The compliment remains, even strengthened by the 'lowkey' prefix

  • @qjames0077
    @qjames0077 Месяц назад +760

    THANK YOU
    So many folks don't realize how this is going to affect the average American

    • @zoanth4
      @zoanth4 Месяц назад +42

      Slave labor both across the pond and here is wrong. We should all be willing to pay more so that our workers can earn more.

    • @iammrbeat
      @iammrbeat  Месяц назад +94

      Indeed :(

    • @AC-vc5qp
      @AC-vc5qp Месяц назад +11

      @@zoanth4yes but the raise in prices would be insane, especially if we want to make stuff in the us

    • @qjames0077
      @qjames0077 Месяц назад +16

      @@zoanth4 I'm familiar with the Uyghur plight, but not all cheap products are made using forced labor. Tarrifs aren't the only plausible solution

    • @zoanth4
      @zoanth4 Месяц назад +1

      @AC-vc5qp prices are currently skyrocketing due to made in China models, you want to continue that model?

  • @jalenweatherspoon96
    @jalenweatherspoon96 Месяц назад +134

    The saddest part is that the people who need to see this won’t and even if they do they will scroll past out of ignorance. Thank you for this video

    • @ColdSid
      @ColdSid Месяц назад +11

      If the economist are right and Trump goes through with his plan .. they’ll understand it when shit hits the fan

    • @Tennyson999
      @Tennyson999 Месяц назад +10

      not american but im sure his voters will realize how much they f'd up once your grocery prices and everything else all go up lol. i just hope it won't somehow affect global PC parts price lmaoo

    • @nakulaman
      @nakulaman Месяц назад +1

      ​@@Tennyson999Oh they'll realise and they'll immediately blame it on the democrats somehow. Trump can do no wrong in their eyes

    • @Galow311
      @Galow311 Месяц назад +1

      @Tennyson999 our grocery prices are already high and trust, if America fails your vassal state will follow suit

    • @Abel-Alvarez
      @Abel-Alvarez Месяц назад +5

      ​@@Tennyson999 lmao right? I'm barely getting my PC setup and thankfully almost done buying what I need before everything goes up. 😂😭

  • @DXnationmember
    @DXnationmember Месяц назад +429

    The most common point that tariff defenders use is that USA products are going to be cheaper and sell more. In reality, American companies would raise their prices to match the competition and make more money at the same time.

    • @iammrbeat
      @iammrbeat  Месяц назад +147

      USA products are going to remain expensive as long as American incomes are decent

    • @sirllamaiii9708
      @sirllamaiii9708 Месяц назад +9

      I dont think anyone's ever made that argument, at least ive never heard it. I think the general consensus among tariff people is that goods will cost more, but itll make more higher paying jobs, so the effective cost will be lowered or about the same if that makes sense.

    • @use10483
      @use10483 Месяц назад +5

      not true, undercutting the market is how a company grows relative to its competition. the problem with tariffs is that artificially changing prices decreases efficiency, the problem with many forms of taxation

    • @possumverde
      @possumverde Месяц назад +9

      @sirllamaiii9708 Higher paying jobs with higher priced items just means a rise in inflation. which, in turn, means that said higher pay isn't really higher purchasing power.

    • @Artyomi
      @Artyomi Месяц назад +7

      @@use10483 Aw thats kinda cute how you think the US market actually has competition.

  • @Xsetsu
    @Xsetsu Месяц назад +556

    The price of eggs during the Great Depression went form $0.03 to $0.10 a dozen because of the tariffs. Now just imagine a price increase like that today.

    • @nestorv7627
      @nestorv7627 Месяц назад +67

      I can. I live in Miami. 60 eggs were about $7 in Walmart in 2021. The average price of that same box of eggs I buy biweekly is almost $20 right now.

    • @Xsetsu
      @Xsetsu Месяц назад +90

      @@nestorv7627 That's insane. The problem is that is a lot more than inflation. It is greed.

    • @beccangavin
      @beccangavin Месяц назад +65

      @@nestorv7627Are you buying gold plated eggs? I buy the big cartons of eggs for $4. I can get them from organic local farmers for twice that if I want fancy eggs...Just looked up the inflation rate in Florida and apparently you guys are above the national average. Sorry.

    • @GrizzlyT2945
      @GrizzlyT2945 Месяц назад +5

      Looks like my wife's backyard chicken cook that she bought for me to take care of might end up paying off!

    • @i_like_beer-o2f
      @i_like_beer-o2f Месяц назад

      @@nestorv7627 avian flu outbreak caused that. You can stop buying eggs until it subsides if you want to save money

  • @juniemcgraw8860
    @juniemcgraw8860 Месяц назад +894

    Would love a video on what high-paying jobs could replace manufacturing because I can’t think any off top of my head.

    • @iammrbeat
      @iammrbeat  Месяц назад +571

      Heck yeah. I will have to make this video.

    • @frenzalrhomb6919
      @frenzalrhomb6919 Месяц назад +1

      ​@@iammrbeat
      I know, I know, ditch digging. Everyone's going to eventually need a "ditch" of one kind or another (💀) so ditch digging could be "a new and unexpected growth sector"

    • @mrhitech6742
      @mrhitech6742 Месяц назад +170

      UBI recipient

    • @ruedelta
      @ruedelta Месяц назад +144

      Automation engineer. Don't learn how to do a tool's job, learn how to use and maintain tools to do jobs.

    • @mattdeluccia153
      @mattdeluccia153 Месяц назад +13

      @@mrhitech6742I hope not, that sounds like a miserable way to live having to wait for your allowance from Daddy government

  • @kylemcmullan2831
    @kylemcmullan2831 Месяц назад +231

    An interesting point made by the Wall Street Journal on their recent tariff video is how domestic industries also increase prices after a tariff is introduced. In their example, they looked at the tariffs placed on washing machines. As expected, the price on foreign washing machines increased, but also, the price on domestic washing machines increased about the same amount as well. You would expect that domestic companies might instead keep their price the same and gain market share, but that would mean more units sold, which means they need to grow their manufacturing, which is a very long and expensive process. On the other hand, increasing prices can be done fast and gives more profit immediately, so tariffs cause domestic manufacturers to increase prices as well.
    As another effect, even though dryers were not subject to tariffs, their prices increased the same amount also, this is because consumers are used to paying a similar amount for a washer as a dryer, so it was once again easy money. This is why tariffs are said by economists to be an inefficient way of collecting tax, because the consumer is paying more for washers and dryers manufactured anywhere, but the US government is only collecting money on foreign-made washing machine tariffs.

    • @armandoventura9043
      @armandoventura9043 Месяц назад

      And that's why Trump will put a tariff on electric cars, that way Musk sells the Teslas he produces in the United States at a higher price and also gets a tax cut
      Anyone with 3 neurons and enough information can deduce it

    • @What-ez6im
      @What-ez6im Месяц назад

      simple, price controls.

    • @danielch6662
      @danielch6662 Месяц назад +4

      @@What-ez6im you're killing capitalism.

    • @cadesmandela1935
      @cadesmandela1935 Месяц назад

      @@danielch6662yep, they will never implement fundamental changes to the system because every single positive change that hurts the ruling class’s bottom line is “communism/socialism/woke/whatever”

    • @1dgram
      @1dgram Месяц назад +4

      Maybe if c-suite weren't as focused on the next quarter as they were on the five or ten year outlook, it would be different. Change the expiration of the stock options they get and you'd see more long term investment.

  • @wowcorny
    @wowcorny Месяц назад +64

    Tariffs only work if it's specific and targeted. A blanket tariff on the other hand is just mind boggingly stupid.

    • @greenman8
      @greenman8 Месяц назад

      Stupid is, as Stupid does.
      I am still, just numb over the upcoming administration. God I hope I am wrong, I would love to eat crow!

    • @r_watkinsi9443
      @r_watkinsi9443 Месяц назад +6

      I absolutely agree with this comment!

    • @christiansmith1793
      @christiansmith1793 Месяц назад +6

      I expected to see more pushback in these comments but it seems like the maga crowd avoided this vid

    • @vetinaris1297
      @vetinaris1297 25 дней назад

      Define 'work', as in what is the intended result that can be measured as working?

    • @GRAHAM282828
      @GRAHAM282828 3 дня назад +1

      @@christiansmith1793 expecting a MAGA person to fully comprehend a 26 minute about anything is giving them a lot of credit

  • @RomWatt
    @RomWatt Месяц назад +621

    Tariffs, in theory, are meant to protect local/national manufacturers, but in practice, it just gives them an excuse to make their products more expensive.

    • @mattdeluccia153
      @mattdeluccia153 Месяц назад +31

      Your theory falls completely flat if the cost increase is so much that the consumers will not pay. Nobody is going to pay a 200% price increase on a foreign vehicle made in Mexico. They will simply buy a car made domestically. Because of this foreign auto manufactures will start building their manufacturing plants in the USA because they need the American consumer base to sell to.

    • @LeDoctorBones
      @LeDoctorBones Месяц назад +147

      @@mattdeluccia153 And then they will sell those domestically manufactured cars at 190% the initial cost because they have no foreign competition.

    • @DeosPraetorian
      @DeosPraetorian Месяц назад

      ​ They will still increase the price to just below The most consumers are willing to pay@@mattdeluccia153

    • @mattdeluccia153
      @mattdeluccia153 Месяц назад +15

      @@LeDoctorBones That’s a very fair critique, but I doubt domestic producers would do that. Like I said before, these companies want to sell as much product as possible. Every car they don’t sell is a sunk cost that depreciates in value over time. If people can’t afford the product, the maker won’t be able to sell it. It’s not like people will not be able to get a car since there are millions of used cars for sale throughout the country. I’m not an economist but my family has been in the auto industry for generations and I have a decent understanding of how that business works.

    • @TheWipeout32
      @TheWipeout32 Месяц назад

      @@mattdeluccia153 Wait, you doubt that companies, who are driven by a desire for the biggest profit margins possible, won't jack their prices up because they can? They did it and blamed it on inflation already. Kroger admitted to it. And if one was doing it, more were doing it. And you don't have a good idea how it works, since all the electronics and wiring and steel and plastics and spark plugs and components, including the rare earth elemental and rare earth minerals necessary for computers and electronics that are not mined here in the U.S. and cannot be mined because they do not exist, need to be made in the United States, as well. So, it isn't just one company jacking up the prices. It's *tens, if not hundreds, of them*. And you, my friend, get stuck with the final cost. China already slapped a ban on imporing rare earths to the United States, and Trump doesn't care about allies, so I hope you're ready to watch computer prices fucking skyrocket. Now, add to that yet another cost in the form of tariffs. When you people trigger another depression, on top of a Measels outbreak or Avian flu pandemic, since adults remember how well he handled the last one, you'll have nobody blame for it but yourselves.

  • @GavinkyleXD
    @GavinkyleXD Месяц назад +326

    I knew Trump was a big tariff guy, but the fact that he just said that the favorite word in the English dictionary is tariff is the funniest thing.

    • @_Dibbler_
      @_Dibbler_ Месяц назад +74

      And he knows words, he knows all the best words

    • @tomlxyz
      @tomlxyz Месяц назад

      That statement sums it up pretty well. No one who has in depth understanding about a topic X will just say that X is their favorite word. Most likely, if there's a favorite word in the first place, it'll be some obscure term. It's all the same again as the ineffectiveness of building a wall to solve immigration

    • @lukaszwodzynskiHNB
      @lukaszwodzynskiHNB Месяц назад

      it really isn't funny, this moron will (again) be the most important person in the world soon

    • @hayteren
      @hayteren Месяц назад +19

      He's probably the most hilarious president we've had

    • @elliott614
      @elliott614 Месяц назад +7

      He and his donors will be exempted of course

  • @SgtJoeSmith
    @SgtJoeSmith Месяц назад +118

    Tariffs are taxes on the poor. Trying to save money by buying cheaper Chinese stuff? Well, you got to pay more now. You got to pay a poor tax now. Cause the company or country ain't paying it. They just adding it to the price you pay. And now that Chinese stuff costs more than American stuff. American companies raise prices for more profit because they can.

    • @nakulaman
      @nakulaman Месяц назад +1

      This is exactly the plan. Trump will continue to cut taxes for the rich while raising them for the poor. Absolutely vile

    • @ChobeVelyasha
      @ChobeVelyasha 11 дней назад

      You are Woke

  • @tylerhackner9731
    @tylerhackner9731 Месяц назад +358

    Tariffs are regressive taxation

    • @iammrbeat
      @iammrbeat  Месяц назад +207

      Thank you for pointing this out, Tyler! They hurt poor people and small businesses the most.

    • @UGMD
      @UGMD Месяц назад

      It’s pretty pessimistic, but I think this is absolutely the reason trump wants them. It’s an easy way to hide making the tax bracket more regressive while further reducing taxes on the wealthy

    • @CuddlesTbear99999
      @CuddlesTbear99999 Месяц назад

      @@iammrbeat That, and they have typically transferred wealth to the elite at a faster rate too. Although I think you actually did point that out without saying it that way. Thanks for all the great videos.

    • @Fjaloeat1
      @Fjaloeat1 Месяц назад

      @@iammrbeat They're are going to cut SNAP, Medicaid, and TANF. All while cutting the number of agriculture workers and increasing tariffs. Poor people are about to have a really rough 4 years.

    • @pranshukrishna5105
      @pranshukrishna5105 Месяц назад +5

      @@iammrbeat liberal propaganda. Washington state has high sales tax on goods, but dosen't tax inome, it is doing well

  • @philliphessel6788
    @philliphessel6788 Месяц назад +18

    One motive for adopting the U.S. Constitution was that trade barriers among the several states were bringing them to the brink of shooting war.
    Today, nigh nobody is more worried about the trade imbalance between California (world’s 5th largest economy) and Montana (population less than San Francisco County), than about that between two streets in the same town.
    The latter can actually be very significant due to the dynamics of capitalism concentrating ownership in cartels that maximize profit by reducing real market freedom - and not putting profit back into circulation in the community from which it’s extracted.
    The phenomenon of racially segregated slums in the USA is a microcosm of how this plays out in global imperialism.
    What too many fail to recognize is that empires of financial capital are the real great powers today, using (or disposing of) nation-states as serves their interests rather than the other way around.
    Where we have institutions of popular electoral power, it’s the electorate’s own allowance of the propaganda big money buys effectively to dictate how they vote - even beforehand routinely setting the very menu of candidates on party-primary ballots - that enables perpetuation of unpopular policies.
    What would be for the majority better than tariffs is simply requiring that _anyone_ selling goods in our jurisdiction must meet minimum standards in treatment of workers, customers and the environment.
    Were the peoples of the USA and Canada thus to form a united front, their combined market would present an irresistible incentive. The leveling of the playing field would get us out of the race to the bottom into which we’ve been plunged.
    The competition among segments of labor would then be chiefly not on the basis of lower wage but on the basis of greater productivity. Investment in education, health and infrastructure can in that respect (as well as the more obvious ways) pay dividends.
    Unregulated capitalism is like a cancer the growth of which eventually ends itself by destroying too much of the host organism, that being the market of workers/consumers.
    However, the big winners in that game of musical chairs on the sinking deck of the _Titanic_ will be poised to dominate a reversion to something more like feudalism.
    If you actually need to work for a living, then in that event you definitely won’t be a winner.

    • @iammrbeat
      @iammrbeat  Месяц назад +6

      Dang, what an impressive comment 👏

    • @Joutube_is_trash
      @Joutube_is_trash Месяц назад

      Yeah but no one has the nuts to tell China to stop employing slave labor.

  • @FlowMichael
    @FlowMichael Месяц назад +171

    I think it's important to note that tarrifs are an inherently regressive form of taxation - rich people do benefit from them replacing income tax, but not everyone else.

    • @zoanth4
      @zoanth4 Месяц назад +10

      Our nation did very well before the income tax.

    • @iammrbeat
      @iammrbeat  Месяц назад +58

      Yep! Tariffs hurt poor people and small businesses the most.

    • @AC-vc5qp
      @AC-vc5qp Месяц назад +17

      @@zoanth4 yea but that was an incredibly long time ago, you can’t compare that to today

    • @FlowMichael
      @FlowMichael Месяц назад +38

      ​@zoanth4 ok? Income tax isn't being totally replaced, just reduced for wealthy people and tarrifs are being used to account for the missing revenue. Tax burden isn't going down, it's just being shifted towards middle class and poor people.

    • @zoanth4
      @zoanth4 Месяц назад +4

      @AC-vc5qp well the mass welfare state and foreign aid industrial complex scam would go away. I'm ok with this

  • @matthewhedrichjr.5445
    @matthewhedrichjr.5445 Месяц назад +270

    No tariffs without representations during normal times

    • @iammrbeat
      @iammrbeat  Месяц назад +113

      That's the thing. We are in normal times, and yet politicians are wanting to raise tariffs. It just doesn't make sense.

    • @sketchygetchey8299
      @sketchygetchey8299 Месяц назад

      @@iammrbeatthat’s because some politicians make no sense at all. They want to create an invisible problem/enemy or make a mountain out of a mole hill just to win votes.

    • @John.Smith98765
      @John.Smith98765 Месяц назад +16

      @@iammrbeat The economy is terrible and the world is on fire, we are not in normal times

    • @2010hyundaielantra
      @2010hyundaielantra Месяц назад +2

      tariffs, taxes, sending aid to other countries and war should be put on national votes

    • @blakekennemer1166
      @blakekennemer1166 Месяц назад +54

      @@John.Smith98765 The economy is actually the best it’s ever been, it’s just that it’s all going to the billionaire class.
      But don’t worry, I’m sure all the billionaires in the incoming cabinet won’t act in their own self interest like they have been their whole lives

  • @weasel3299
    @weasel3299 Месяц назад +104

    I feel like something else that people overlook is that if international products are higher in price, domestic producers (if they hypothetically make everything) will meet in the middle and prices will be higher as a result. Profit is the bottom line and this would allow those companies more profit, either way it’s a lose lose

    • @Yuletide_3535
      @Yuletide_3535 Месяц назад +9

      @@weasel3299 I was waiting to see if anyone had pointed this out. This is one of the most important effects tariffs have on prices.

    • @dahalofreeek
      @dahalofreeek Месяц назад +11

      They tariffed the washing machines, and this increased the price of not just locally made washing machines, but also spilled over into other household appliances that weren't directly targeted by tariffs.

    • @duncanhw
      @duncanhw Месяц назад +1

      that's exactly what the pro-tariff people say, though. The prices go up, the profits go up, more companies join the market to taste the profits, profits and prices go down again until you're left with a competitive market. Now when you get rid of the tariff, you have a strong, efficient, cheap, functioning local industry.
      I'm very much against tariffs but your argument here against is rather an argument for.

    • @theseyi
      @theseyi Месяц назад +9

      @@duncanhw that’s just not what happens. See, if their competitors prices went up, wouldn’t their prices stay down to begin with? Yet thanks to easy profits, they just raise prices instead of trying to sell more units. If other companies joined the industry because of high profits and managed to scale up to be worthy competitors, reality shows that they often keep prices high. Why? Because they joined the market specifically because profits are so high, so why would they lower their prices and miss out on high profits?
      Reality has shown repeatedly that everyone raises prices to match with tariffs, it does NOT go back down again.

    • @VeronicaM-pf8oo
      @VeronicaM-pf8oo Месяц назад

      This was likely a feature, not a bug, to whomever whispered this idea into trump's ear.

  • @finegoldstones
    @finegoldstones 26 дней назад +2

    I love Mr Beat videos. This one is one of my favorites. Everything is explained so clearly and in a way to keep interest throughout the video, your sense of humor and goofy authenticity is such a strong strength of yours and you know to lean on it. I hope you do end up doing a video on why no good jobs have replaced the old ones that went away with manufacturing jobs decreasing. Thank you for educating us and for being yourself! It's helping a lot of people.

  • @onjulraz754
    @onjulraz754 Месяц назад +45

    Fellow teacher here! My students have been asking about tariffs. Your video will make a great review!

    • @Mirrale
      @Mirrale 18 дней назад

      One thing I don’t think he really emphasized enough is that domestic producers will also be able to raise their prices close to that of the foreign goods anyway.
      Basically, the domestic producers can either keep prices low and capture a larger market share (which is the purpose of the tariff), or increase their prices too. In the first case, they might not be able to currently produce enough to meet that increased market share without investing to expand production. This is often a lot less attractive than simply raising prices which is an immediate and easy means of profiting. Especially if there’s no guarantee that the tariffs will be in place forever.
      Tell them about that too

  • @jcash49
    @jcash49 Месяц назад +5

    Thank you for doing this. 2024 has been exhausting after debunking flat Earth "theories" and explaining why 1x1 does not equal 2. Now I can share this video when someone claims tariffs are paid by other countries or will magically lower our prices.

  • @sarahgk6870
    @sarahgk6870 Месяц назад +157

    A week or so before the election I saw a clip of trump on Fox News. This isn’t a perfect quote but he said something like, “Times are tough for Americans. Americans have never had it so bad. We need to go back to the way it was in the 1890s. That was the best time and it hasn’t been that good since.“ 🤦‍♀️ What does he think was so good about the 1890s?

    • @Rivecha
      @Rivecha Месяц назад

      1890s was the Gilded Age, marked by tacky excess, robber barons, and corrupt politicians. Of course Trump would love the 1890s, he'd fit right in with that time.

    • @kennethfisher7013
      @kennethfisher7013 Месяц назад +27

      So we finally know when America was great.

    • @TheWipeout32
      @TheWipeout32 Месяц назад +57

      I suspect he meant 1990s, but man, that's the mother of Freudian slips right there.

    • @wailin4192
      @wailin4192 Месяц назад +27

      @@TheWipeout32 he probably was referring to the 1890s since he’s spoken a lot about his admiration of McKinley.

    • @TheWipeout32
      @TheWipeout32 Месяц назад +2

      @@wailin4192 On one level, that's surprising he knows about McKinley at all. On the other level, that he'd admire a president who instituted a genocidal policy in the Philippines doesn't surprise me. On the third hand, does this mean we get someone who admires TR and wants to be TR after him? Man, I hope so. We're in desperate need of some progressivism in this country, and not the infantile stuff you see on Twitter and Tumblr. Real progressivism; pro-union, pro-labor, pro-living wage, pro-UBI, pro-strong Kennedy-style Square Deal/New Deal progressivism.

  • @Crunch104
    @Crunch104 Месяц назад +113

    Don't forget the part how North American manufacturing business owners simply moved their businesses to Mexico or overseas, or their purchases for their business. They then just pocketed the profit from the cheaper labour. Short term gain with no consideration for long terms effects on employment in NA. Not sustainable.

    • @mattsmelley5569
      @mattsmelley5569 Месяц назад +6

      Agree, 💯, but also add to your post , if you want to or have the time , CONGRESS COULD HAVE STOPPED the companies from moving BUT CONGRESS DID NOTHING.
      in many ways the above scenario explains "drinking from the same trough"

    • @anivicuno9473
      @anivicuno9473 Месяц назад

      ​@@mattsmelley5569
      You're all so cute, believeing the idea that businesses engage in long term thinking. Like bruh, the US economic system is a bunch of companies fighting to the death until one or two emerge victorious in each sector and then maximizes short term profit. Capture of congress by the rich, outsourcing, consolidation, these are all the system working as designed.

    • @Crunch104
      @Crunch104 Месяц назад

      @@mattsmelley5569 Yes, I'm in Canada and our government did practically the same.

    • @mattsmelley5569
      @mattsmelley5569 Месяц назад +1

      @@Crunch104
      Thanks, 🤔🤔🤔 I'll think on it

  • @brookelynshaw9738
    @brookelynshaw9738 Месяц назад +77

    Economics professor here. Thank you for your service. Well said.

    • @Mirrale
      @Mirrale 18 дней назад

      I love how politicians are always rambling about trade deficits meanwhile economics professors just shrug and refer to them as “foreign investment”.

  • @Autodidactyl
    @Autodidactyl Месяц назад +16

    Thank you, Mr. Beat! Your videos are so educational and entertaining. :)

  • @havehope646
    @havehope646 Месяц назад +125

    Interesting timing for this video Mr.Beat 👀

    • @iammrbeat
      @iammrbeat  Месяц назад +79

      I got soo many requests to make it. I gave into peer pressure. lol

    • @havehope646
      @havehope646 Месяц назад +10

      @iammrbeat haha lol love you man

  • @thegreatteaman
    @thegreatteaman Месяц назад +141

    I believe Tariffs are a necessary and important tool for governments to use, but the key is, like all other things in economics, MODERATION, which in the case of tariffs, means using them very rarely, and only in specific circumstances. They have their use, but they can be dangerous when mismanaged.

    • @millabasset1710
      @millabasset1710 Месяц назад +39

      Why punish people for buying a better product? If a foreign country makes better cars and you tax the consumer, that does nobody any good.

    • @zoanth4
      @zoanth4 Месяц назад

      ​@@millabasset1710cuz buying things off of slave states is wrong?
      Plus it drives down our wages

    • @iammrbeat
      @iammrbeat  Месяц назад +113

      They should RARELY be used.

    • @thegreatteaman
      @thegreatteaman Месяц назад +21

      @@millabasset1710 oh I agree. At the end of the day, if people want to buy a better product from a foreign business then they should be able to without being punished with increased prices. Tariffs are something that should be used sparingly and only in specific circumstances.

    • @binbows2258
      @binbows2258 Месяц назад +22

      @@millabasset1710 The only real use case that I see for tariffs is in preservation of the military industrial complex. For example, limiting car importation not due to some kind of market fear, but because you want to preserve your motor industry for potential use during wartime.
      Same with steel or electronics, wanting to avoid become too dependent on foreigners so that during national emergencies you can still produce domestically. If you don't do this somewhat, you can end up like Russia with very poor domestic production causing an overreliance on imports and reducing military capacity.

  • @dylanjones7485
    @dylanjones7485 Месяц назад +80

    The world is better when this guy uploads

    • @iammrbeat
      @iammrbeat  Месяц назад +18

      Aww. Thank you :)

    • @dylanjones7485
      @dylanjones7485 Месяц назад +5

      no problem my favourite should be senator

  • @mikechiu9767
    @mikechiu9767 Месяц назад +10

    People are angry because rich dudes are abusing the system, so they voted a rich dude in to "fix" the problem. Totally makes sense.

    • @6z0
      @6z0 Месяц назад +1

      Trump was already President and our economy was booming. 2018 was the record year for the highest average take home pay of ALL Americans in the entire country…

    • @mikechiu9767
      @mikechiu9767 Месяц назад +5

      @@6z0 If only the world was so simple.

    • @6z0
      @6z0 Месяц назад +1

      @@mikechiu9767 Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, Joe Biden, all rich men that democrats voted for to “fix” the problem. Hahaha you know Clinton was BFFs with Trump during Clintons presidency? How much did democrats benefit Trump in the 90s by voting for his buddy?

    • @Megatron-wz2pn
      @Megatron-wz2pn Месяц назад +4

      @@6z0It was because of Obama the economy was doing well. Trump just happened to be president and hijack the credit.

    • @baneofbanes
      @baneofbanes 28 дней назад

      People aren’t smart, especially when they’re angry.

  • @last9up
    @last9up Месяц назад +10

    No thank you. I want to stay ignorant so when it affects me negatively I can complain about it. But I appreciate the effort.

  • @kotm2021
    @kotm2021 Месяц назад +58

    Even as someone who thinks tariffs can be beneficial in some instances, I fully acknowledge the economic damage it can cause as well.

    • @zoanth4
      @zoanth4 Месяц назад +6

      Gotta think in the long term bro.
      Everything electronic lasts 5 years and wages suck.
      I'll gladly pay more to reverse this.

    • @iammrbeat
      @iammrbeat  Месяц назад +29

      Because you actually study economics, and good for you!

    • @VeronicaM-pf8oo
      @VeronicaM-pf8oo Месяц назад

      @@zoanth4 You wanna pick up the tab for my increased costs as well?

    • @capribreezee
      @capribreezee Месяц назад +4

      @@zoanth4 don't matter what country is making the product, they always gonna cut corners to make a profit

    • @zoanth4
      @zoanth4 Месяц назад +1

      @capribreezee well they are public corporations. Its literally job (and the law) that they maximize profits
      And yeah it would matter, cuz paying Americans 15 to 20 an hour is superior to paying some Asian slave 2 dollars an hour

  • @StunningMcC
    @StunningMcC Месяц назад +13

    Mike from Jersey here. No problem, Mr. Beat. Keep it up

    • @iammrbeat
      @iammrbeat  Месяц назад +3

      No way! It's MIKE!

  • @burgrrcat
    @burgrrcat Месяц назад +8

    your speaking voice for videos has come so far you werent ever bad but compared to your first videos youve come along way

    • @iammrbeat
      @iammrbeat  Месяц назад +2

      That's kind of you to comment. Thanks for your support.

  • @BayleySaxon
    @BayleySaxon Месяц назад +15

    Let’s also not forget that the reason why he’s pushing Ms. Terrace, like Mr. beat said, is to reduce the income tax. Which really again only benefits, the rich in the long run… everything they’re doing right now is to structure our economy to work for the billionaires

  • @Dawg476
    @Dawg476 Месяц назад +106

    This is why anyone who wants to be the leader should be forced to do tests on their knowledge before running.

    • @mikeoxlong3676
      @mikeoxlong3676 Месяц назад +6

      The voters should take a test.

    • @amineau82
      @amineau82 Месяц назад +5

      Watching a RUclips video that is clearly one-sided don't make you a expert 🤣🤣🤣🤦🤦🤦🤦

    • @Dawg476
      @Dawg476 Месяц назад +9

      @@amineau82 You are 100% right, facts are on the left and lies are on the right.

    • @amineau82
      @amineau82 Месяц назад

      @@Dawg476 That's not what the record says 🤣🤣🤣 all Democrats do is lie even when they are caught. They know some people ☝️ will follow them no matter what 🤦🤦🤦

    • @Fakemarcel
      @Fakemarcel Месяц назад

      @@amineau82 my guy was pretty middle ground in the video giving valid and proven reasons why tariffs are both terrible and alright depending on the situation. Although im assuming youre one of those Trumpies who just defends those points for no reason, I dont understand the need to defend politicians. Regardless of party they both suck, especially Trump the moron.

  • @robokaos69
    @robokaos69 Месяц назад +10

    Thank you for trying to explain these things to people. It is painful seeing the direction my country is headed culturally, and I only hope that people like you spreading good, and valuable information, can help to keep us from regressing.

  • @tiwtid6055
    @tiwtid6055 Месяц назад +18

    Hey Matt! When will your 2024 Presidential Election video be up? Love the channel.

    • @iammrbeat
      @iammrbeat  Месяц назад +12

      In February. And thank you so much!

  • @TrooperLITE
    @TrooperLITE 17 дней назад +2

    Thanks!

  • @samsam21amb
    @samsam21amb Месяц назад +20

    As an Australian, who also loves economics and is studying it at school. US tariffs will also affect other countries too. Since Australia is China’s largest supplier of iron ore the decreased demand from the US (because higher prices and people choosing to buy locally) will mean China will demand less iron from us, therefore, since most of economy is based of exporting iron and other commodities to China we will be negatively impacted. And American tariffs could hurt its biggest Asia-Pacific ally which is important to the US because of our relationship & proximity with China. (Yk, in case of war)

    • @luisluzania9713
      @luisluzania9713 Месяц назад +5

      As a fellow econ student to another, let me correct one thing. China will not demand less iron from you, they will simply demand a lower price, using the decreased demand from the competitor as a bargaining chip. Australia will find it has to lower prices for China for the market to clear iron.

    • @Joesteroven
      @Joesteroven Месяц назад

      Well when you elect a clown …. You know the rest

  • @KyleHarrisonRedacted
    @KyleHarrisonRedacted 7 дней назад +3

    24:02 I find this part pretty funny
    Much of the factory work has closed up shop in rural areas. Many young people have fled rural areas to bigger cities to secure better income.
    Cities tax and nickle and dime you for everything your worth, and your worse off with your higher paying job than you were jobless back in the country
    So you move back to the country, but have no capital to make something of it
    So you start booting shine and weed to make due
    But then nothing ever comes to the country
    So now you’re just an outlaw doing outlaw things to survive and now you’re stuck
    Geez. It’s almost like remote work would have solved this. Can remote work? Move rural. This reduces pressure in the cities and housing and goods become more affordable there for people who cannot work remote to fulfill their duties

  • @Tejiknasten
    @Tejiknasten Месяц назад +10

    Watching this, I kinda miss the days of Reagan, Bush 41 and Clinton, when both parties agreed that tariff's were wrong. Watching this also makes me appreciate mr Beat's infotainment videos, exploring things with fact, but also with a remarkable sense of witty humour. 🎉

    • @nari5161
      @nari5161 Месяц назад +6

      I used to have many conservative friends and enjoyed casual debate secure in the knowledge that we all wanted the same things but disagreed on how to go about it. Now, I have relatives who think I shouldn't have the right to vote.

    • @John-tr5hn
      @John-tr5hn Месяц назад

      Clinton's deregulation of the banking industry led almost directly to the 2008 recession. NAFTA killed way more jobs than it created, and the only beneficiaries were people who owned stock.

    • @kraigisboss
      @kraigisboss Месяц назад +1

      Reagan tried Tariffs about once for steel when the US steel companies promised to invest more if he did so. Then 5 years later Reagan got rid of the Tariff cause the steel companies hadn't invested much and were raking in massive profits.

  • @52HzWhaleMusic
    @52HzWhaleMusic 29 дней назад +4

    Gotta love it when the party of free markets and small government uses the government to control the markets

  • @MaryamMaqdisi
    @MaryamMaqdisi Месяц назад +5

    I don't oppose specific tariffs for important industries you want to protect and whatnot, but a blind tariff to all imported goods from a country you don't like it's extremely silly. And of course this type of this also encourages retaliatory tariffs and even smuggling.
    That said, I don't think free markets as a whole made the whole world a better place. Lots of countries, including my own, got poorer as our natural resources get extracted and exported to the global north, where a machine does a bit of work, and then it's resold to us expecting to pay a premium. The world economy is bad for the majority of people. Just saying.

  • @justindie7543
    @justindie7543 Месяц назад +82

    To anyone still confused why tariffs are bad, imagine it occurring at a small scale and at an extreme. What if the mayor of your town put a 20000% tax on all goods produced outside of your town?

    • @Tchaikfan
      @Tchaikfan Месяц назад +8

      This is a great analogy

    • @2010hyundaielantra
      @2010hyundaielantra Месяц назад +23

      Again, Not everything is black and white. Some tariffs should exist, like on goods Being attacked by unfair trade practices (Like trade dumping) or goods that would cause severe economic damage were they not available (Like Microchips, if China invades Taiwan, they can't make those anymore), but Blanket tariffs, like the ones Trump is proposing, or tariffs on goods that aren't under attack (Like, say, the auto industry) are ultimately harmful. I personally agree that Trump's tariffs will do more harm than good, but not all tariffs are bad

    • @jamescindric5056
      @jamescindric5056 Месяц назад +4

      What I am missing here is how the negative effects of tariffs are any different to the negative effects of goods taxes but also they have some upsides and can be more targeted. Goods taxes are way more inflationary than tariffs and don't support local production. They also kill small businesses which have to buy from other businesses, whereas businesses which can control the while chain don't have to pay on each stage.

    • @betohax
      @betohax Месяц назад +1

      Basically Corporate taxes

    • @perguto
      @perguto Месяц назад +4

      To anyone still confused why laws are bad, imagine it occurring at a small scale and at an extreme. What if a boy stole an apple and the mayor of your town put him in jail for 200000 years????

  • @idkanymore_yeah
    @idkanymore_yeah Месяц назад +24

    I’m back as mr Beat’s no1 fan. I gotta up my game again, embarrassed to say.

  • @Moonwalker_2007
    @Moonwalker_2007 Месяц назад +14

    OMG thank you for making this video!!!

    • @iammrbeat
      @iammrbeat  Месяц назад +2

      Well thanks for watching!

  • @RanDom-if2ee
    @RanDom-if2ee Месяц назад +36

    Thank you Mr. Beat!!!

    • @iammrbeat
      @iammrbeat  Месяц назад +4

      Well thank YOU for watching and being curious. :)

  • @timpoolssentientbeanie5646
    @timpoolssentientbeanie5646 Месяц назад +5

    I can’t believe the slimy billionaires don’t have the working class’s interests at heart.

  • @skybox4080
    @skybox4080 Месяц назад +11

    The video ends at 1:07

  • @sammcottone5927
    @sammcottone5927 Месяц назад +3

    This is how exactly I’ve been explaining this issue to people. Thanks for the ammo!

  • @FredoRockwell
    @FredoRockwell Месяц назад +9

    Great video! As soon as you mentioned the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act I started replaying Ferris Bueller in my head - and then you played it in the video! 🎉 💯

    • @iammrbeat
      @iammrbeat  Месяц назад +6

      haha I'm glad you also appreciate that movie. I love pretty much all John Hughes movies. I covered a couple of them on my other channel, as a matter of fact. Looking forward to catching up with you next week!

  • @cht2162
    @cht2162 Месяц назад +4

    It's going to be 1930 again when Mr. Tariff takes over.

    • @Fjaloeat1
      @Fjaloeat1 Месяц назад

      The only saving grace is that 2028 might be like 1932 again. Man I would love a generationally amazing President. We're probably gonna need one too to fix the damage.

  • @ReanuKeeves69
    @ReanuKeeves69 Месяц назад +16

    23:13 I was called a "Simp" and then got an ad.

    • @AvatarXIII
      @AvatarXIII Месяц назад

      @@ReanuKeeves69 same

  • @tfjones78
    @tfjones78 Месяц назад +8

    QUALIFIED ECONOMIST. Tariffs can be effective to an economy IF it counters an in balance between the two economies that is unfair. The obvious one is SLAVE LABOUR. So if China produces a good for $1.00 and Australia produces it for $1.50 ... most people would think a $0.50 tariff would balance it. Wrong, thats a trade deficit debate. A fairness debate is Australia's minimum wage is $30ph and China's is $3.00ph in Australian dollars. So, an average manufacturer produces 100 items per hour of labour cost, meaning each item has $0.30 of labour costs in Australia and $0.03 of labour costs in China. Meaning the tarriff should be the difference, being $0.27. THUS, a tariff would mean Chinese goods sell for $1.27 and Australian goods sell for $1.50. If the government needs more taxes than it should cost $1.37 for Chinese goods and $1.60 for Australian goods. If they are both the same quality then CHINA will sell more goods in Australia than locally made. TRADE SURPLUS/DEFICIT is not a reason to introduce a tariff as shown here!!

  • @Omnicarr
    @Omnicarr Месяц назад +4

    Love your content, I look forward to every video!

  • @scottn322
    @scottn322 Месяц назад +15

    Greed is going to be the downfall of this country.
    Or it won't, but it sure feels like it will.

    • @ColdSid
      @ColdSid Месяц назад

      Rich are going to get richer and the poor will get poorer.. it’s been this way forever and politicians ESPECIALLY the billionaire/millionaire politicians aren’t going to change it

  • @jameslingenfelter5379
    @jameslingenfelter5379 Месяц назад +1

    Thank you for your hard work and promotion of knowledge Mr. Beat!

  • @Sadkiller100
    @Sadkiller100 Месяц назад

    thank you mr beat for putting all the sources in description i was just thinking about how to spot biases

  • @jordanl2131
    @jordanl2131 Месяц назад +161

    i’ve talked to a trump supporter who said she voted against kamala because she didn’t run on policy (which i don’t even disagree with) but then when i ask her what she thinks a tariff is she tells me it’s when china pays us for some reason. tariffs were one of the biggest “policies” trump ran on but i’m supposed to believe that these people voted based on policy 😂

    • @iammrbeat
      @iammrbeat  Месяц назад +103

      That is just so depressing

    • @its.that-time
      @its.that-time Месяц назад

      Trump was literally the one who had "concepts of a plan".We did a starter for history where you would look at Trump v Harris policies next to each other and it was even worse than I thought. It just said "Trump didn't say what he'll do about this" basically for most policies. (And he said climate change is a "hoax") The media was trying to play both sides and it made it seem like this wasn't the case.

    • @chronogamer7901
      @chronogamer7901 Месяц назад +52

      We have probably the least informed electorate in the democratic world. It's sad that our elections really are purely vibes based. People only react to what they are feeling in the moment, and our society is losing the ability to think critically about proposed policies. This needs to change or things won't get any better.

    • @its.that-time
      @its.that-time Месяц назад +17

      @chronogamer7901 getting big money out of the system is step one. According to Bernie Sanders, he knows lots of democrats that couldn't vote against sending money to Israel because Aipac would stop giving them money. A big part of the reason why many reasonable people you and I know voted for Trump is because Trump could afford more propaganda. From an outside view, most people can see voting for Trump is insanity (also Harris actually was a great candidate imo)

    • @somerandomguy4919
      @somerandomguy4919 Месяц назад +20

      Reading that person who has no idea how tarrifs work is a good example when the republican party shut down the dept of education leading to idiocracy

  • @chelseyislol74
    @chelseyislol74 Месяц назад +50

    Let’s just hope presidents act as they usually do, not keeping their campaign promises. 🤞

    • @chronogamer7901
      @chronogamer7901 Месяц назад +16

      Trump keeps doubling down on tariff threats since the election, which makes me not feel optimistic about that. He is also backtracking on his promise to lower grocery prices.

    • @chelseyislol74
      @chelseyislol74 Месяц назад +13

      @ I’m not optimistic either. I don’t know how people fell for lowering grocery prices. I mean, tariffs are going to inflate grocery prices even more, but you can’t tell that crowd anything.

    • @happyfriendshippal
      @happyfriendshippal Месяц назад

      @@chelseyislol74don’t worry. Deporting the underpaid immigrants who pick all our fruits and vegetables will make up for it

    • @AveryCD
      @AveryCD Месяц назад +2

      Trump literally wanted to make it illegal for parents to buy violent video games for their children when he first ran in 2016. I think we’re good. Hopefully he doesn’t keep his promise on this one😂

    • @kyperactive
      @kyperactive Месяц назад +8

      Yeah no...
      Best case is we get a weaker version of these tariffs, and thats being nice.

  • @ImSomethingSpecial
    @ImSomethingSpecial Месяц назад +14

    My, extremely broke, household has pretty much already entered what I'll call a small-scale famine in the past few days due to how high the cost of living is now. Never thought in my life I'd have to go a few days only living off of bread and hotdogs but that's the reality. Tariffs will make this so much worse.

    • @therealjjwatt
      @therealjjwatt Месяц назад +1

      and yet i bet you still supported biden

    • @ImSomethingSpecial
      @ImSomethingSpecial Месяц назад +1

      @@therealjjwatt Love the assumption when I voted for neither candidate. Sorry to tell you but Trump is not going to help or save our economy, his tariffs and blatant pro-corporatism stances will make things significantly worse.

    • @therealjjwatt
      @therealjjwatt Месяц назад

      @@ImSomethingSpecial you do know biden is incharge right now and you said your struggling to buy bread? keep blaming trump tho

    • @ImSomethingSpecial
      @ImSomethingSpecial Месяц назад +20

      @@therealjjwatt I don't recall once saying things were good under Biden. I seem to recall actually saying things will not get better under Trump and are instead likely to get even worse.

    • @gugurupurasudaikirai7620
      @gugurupurasudaikirai7620 Месяц назад +9

      @@therealjjwatt If he was smart he would have supported Bernie, don't worry, you'll really feel the pain too soon enough when Trumpflation really hits

  • @Ilikeike-h7u
    @Ilikeike-h7u Месяц назад +2

    Thank you Mr.Beat for talking about this it sucks that most people are only realizing this after the election

  • @thegreatmindgorb8948
    @thegreatmindgorb8948 Месяц назад +14

    As a multi-billion dollar company, i think tariffs are based, actually

  • @sugar858
    @sugar858 Месяц назад +10

    Thanks for all you do truly appreciate your content!

  • @SDZ675
    @SDZ675 Месяц назад +33

    Tarriffs isn't the answer but something needed to be done about the decades of manufacturing outsourced to 3rd world countries to exploit child/cheap labor. It's an economic, humanitarian, and security issue especially since our biggest trade partner now is a one party state that was just recently aggressively posturing on taking nearby territories.

    • @iammrbeat
      @iammrbeat  Месяц назад +15

      I agree!

    • @to101md
      @to101md Месяц назад +4

      I big issue IMO is that Tariffs are a blanket punishment. I don't think people would be opposed to a morality-tax wherein if the producer cannot prove that they pay their workers/don't use children/caged animals (etc.) they are taxed to offset the end-consumer price difference that would be lower than products that weren't made with morally dubious methods.

    • @SamD.GOAT0326
      @SamD.GOAT0326 Месяц назад

      I would support that 100%
      These exploitative companies couldn't care less until it effects their profits.
      But instead the big T decided on blanket tariffs on everything 😒​@to101md

    • @mintcake2668
      @mintcake2668 Месяц назад +6

      Here's the thing: for developing countries, it's not a humanitarian issue. Child labor is bad, child starvation is even worse, and millions of children in India are suffering from malnutrition today. For them, working in factory is the least bad option.

    • @DJPleasureSeekingMissle
      @DJPleasureSeekingMissle Месяц назад

      Capitalisms success is dependent on the exploitation and suffering of others. Until we can acknowledge this fact, the conversation goes nowhere.

  • @oleonard7319
    @oleonard7319 Месяц назад +19

    Everytime we have had tariffs get close to 40% we had a depression and 60% a major depression

    • @iammrbeat
      @iammrbeat  Месяц назад +5

      Are you talking average tariff rates or tariffs on specific goods?

    • @oleonard7319
      @oleonard7319 Месяц назад +3

      @iammrbeat avg tariff rates.

  • @HelloSmello
    @HelloSmello 29 дней назад +2

    My dad thought that tariffs were the international companies and we would get the money but I had to explain to him no, in a Mexican restaurant, then he started to talk about the border and cartel in said restaurant (it was so embarrassing)

  • @rashadb954
    @rashadb954 Месяц назад

    Thanks for making this topic easy to understand and with historical context as well!

  • @iggyboo
    @iggyboo Месяц назад +3

    The worst thing is they're trying to do away with the income tax and fund the govt (ie military) with a consumption tax (tarrifs)

    • @iggyboo
      @iggyboo Месяц назад +2

      That way they can sell all their stock and not have to pay any taxes

  • @anildadhich4654
    @anildadhich4654 Месяц назад +11

    My girlfriend got me a Eisenhower, Nixon 1952 hoodie!!! It also says for America! I was so happy to hear that he was your second favorite President and I actually used some of your videos to write a short essay about him on one of my exams!! Love you

    • @iammrbeat
      @iammrbeat  Месяц назад +7

      That's amazing! I need to get me one of those, especially since I appreciate Nixon more today than I used to

    • @jenniferlfm1876
      @jenniferlfm1876 Месяц назад

      ​@iammrbeat Would it be possible to hear your reasoning for your more positive appreciation to Nixon?
      I'm curious as I grew up in a Chinese family who view the Nixon as an important figure that led to opening relations between PRC-USA, but I am not American, so I don't know much about Nixon beyond the big events. Thank you.

  • @fifzeppelin
    @fifzeppelin Месяц назад +3

    I have a really big trade deficit with my local taco bell. I just give them money and they keep giving me cheap crunchwraps and I haven't sold them a single taco. I think I'm going to just throwing ten percent of the cost I pay for taco bell into the trash to incentivize my own fast food production.

  • @Randys_Channel
    @Randys_Channel Месяц назад +1

    Thank you, Mr. Beat. More people need to watch your videos.

  • @ethanteige
    @ethanteige Месяц назад +1

    Banger video, definitely should be seen more in the next few months and years

  • @mangalhao_0
    @mangalhao_0 Месяц назад +11

    this was a top 10 funniest Mr Beat endings, i laughed so hard man

  • @lamontdurr1682
    @lamontdurr1682 Месяц назад +3

    The guy arguing about "referrals" is exactly why America, as a collective, stays dumb on the real issues! He is very popular and is about as ignorant on economic issues as anyone I've ever heard. Yet, people cling to that guy because of their own identity politics!

  • @vincentlee7937
    @vincentlee7937 Месяц назад +4

    great video with facts and shown precedence on the effect of tariffs, however have you thought about our poor conservatives' feeling when making it ?

  • @jonvlahiotis
    @jonvlahiotis Месяц назад +1

    More people need to see this video. Thank you for making this!

  • @Ivan-xk4uy
    @Ivan-xk4uy Месяц назад +1

    Best teacher on the planet 😊🙌🏾🙌🏾

  • @bangbangyoureaboolean1324
    @bangbangyoureaboolean1324 Месяц назад +9

    I hope Trump does the tariffs. People need to see the difference between good and bad policies.

    • @gugurupurasudaikirai7620
      @gugurupurasudaikirai7620 Месяц назад

      People are too stupid to learn the lesson. George W got a second term for f----s sakes

    • @shush6552
      @shush6552 Месяц назад +11

      tbf the trumpies would find a way to blame trans people for it rather than their idol

    • @nari5161
      @nari5161 Месяц назад +7

      They only triple down, no self-reflection or admitting they could have ever been misled.

  • @thelouster5815
    @thelouster5815 Месяц назад +6

    I wanna point out that the western working class isn’t protesting about free trade. They’re protesting the export of manufacturing jobs that used to be well paid.
    The issue is that’s the reason why those jobs got outsourced. Companies want the cheapest labor available (preferably slaves), and countries like China are willing to provide that labor for pennies on the dollar. As long as companies are given free reign to slake their endless greed, nothing is going to change. Tariffs won’t help. They’ll simply make everything worse.

    • @amineau82
      @amineau82 Месяц назад

      You said companies go overseas for cheaper labor. Then why wouldn't tariffs bring that labor back when it cost more to import then produce the product here?

    • @thelouster5815
      @thelouster5815 Месяц назад +3

      @@amineau82 Because it would still be cheaper to have that labor overseas even with a 100% tariff. When I say "pennies on the dollar", I mean that literally.

    • @Calebe428
      @Calebe428 Месяц назад

      @@amineau82 Well those countries pay less because it costs less to live there. An apartment that is $1,000 here might be $100 somewhere else. So when you see people getting paid $500 a month, that doesn't mean the same for them as us. What might seem like slave labor here might be a decent wage somewhere else. Of course that isn't always the case and China has been guilty of that in the past, but China isn't really the stereotypical "slave labor" place we used to think of it as. Costs and wages have increase a lot recently and this has in turn led to increased quality to compete (though not as good as us of course).

    • @dongrant4956
      @dongrant4956 Месяц назад

      ​@@amineau82since their "American" companies and "American" goods, what tarrifs?

    • @vetinaris1297
      @vetinaris1297 25 дней назад

      Weird how they blame the workers in the other country rather than the employer who moved the jobs and the consumer who wants the lower.price because their employer wants to pay less too.

  • @bele13
    @bele13 Месяц назад +5

    The importer pays the tariffs and everyone along the supply chain wants to keep their margin. So, not just does the state make more money (thus being able to reduce taxes for the rich), but corporations along the way do as well (thus increasing profits for the rich). That's why it makes sense that tariffs is Trump's favorite word. It makes more money for the only people he cares about.

    • @Tom-f8r8o
      @Tom-f8r8o Месяц назад

      Explain how tariffs make more profit for a corporation.

    • @iammrbeat
      @iammrbeat  Месяц назад +3

      The rich definitely benefit more.

    • @An_Actual_Rat
      @An_Actual_Rat Месяц назад +2

      @@Tom-f8r8o Imagine if all imported goods cost 25% more.
      Now all companies can raise prices by 20%, inreasing profit margin while still being cheaper than the foreign products.
      Alternatively, they can raise their prices by 25% as well and change nothing, except now they earn more while the average joe get less for their money.
      Remember, shareholders seek infinite growth, only regulations can halt or reverse price inflation.

  • @durian116
    @durian116 Месяц назад

    Love your videos. Super informative with a splash of humor. Thanks!

  • @Oscar_8008
    @Oscar_8008 Месяц назад

    Thanks for making this sir. I have always had no clue in your live chats when people beg for videos about tarrifs

  • @neilchace1858
    @neilchace1858 Месяц назад +11

    Half of America's voting electorate needed to see this video two months ago...

  • @JervisGermane
    @JervisGermane Месяц назад +2

    Will we ever again have a government that's concerned with making life better for its citizens rather than for itself?

    • @Tom-f8r8o
      @Tom-f8r8o Месяц назад

      Trump is the closest thing to that

  • @AveryCD
    @AveryCD Месяц назад +32

    These next 4 years (hopefully 2 if the senate and/or house flip, stopping any horrible policies) will be the biggest “I told you so” in American history😂

    • @CarlGerhardt1
      @CarlGerhardt1 Месяц назад

      Republicans won so they could stop Biden's horrible policies. (Like letting in millions and millions of cheap-labor illegals.)

    • @amineau82
      @amineau82 Месяц назад

      Hopefully the house never flips again. Weird leftist ideologies are dead . The people have had enough of DEI, racist and sexist. Democrats keep these views alive to divide the voters in order to win. American has realized how ridiculous fake the news is.

    • @paullol7852
      @paullol7852 Месяц назад +3

      Trump imposed tariffs in his first term; while inflation worsened because of those, other administration regulations still slowed it down. Way better than the current administration. It is in all American's best interest to wish good luck to the new administration and hope that they do their best

    • @0008loser
      @0008loser Месяц назад +11

      ​@@paullol7852 you do know that those tariffs made them have to bail out farmers and industries lmao

    • @ColdSid
      @ColdSid Месяц назад +10

      @@paullol7852 the farmers suffered in trumps first term Fox News just didn’t talk about it the way they talked about Hillary’s emails and Kamala’s laugh

  • @warmerk
    @warmerk Месяц назад

    mr beat ur awesomeeeee !!! keep uploading i love seeing ur videos pop up on my recommended😩😩😩

  • @Emmyjay1124
    @Emmyjay1124 Месяц назад +1

    This video is going to teach people to educate themselves and do research about what theyre actually voting for next time. Thank you very much Mr Beat. Love your channel.

    • @HoustonLuksa-m8k
      @HoustonLuksa-m8k 19 дней назад

      What were you voting for if you voted for the other side, in this election you really just didn't have a choice. But this video is running off protectionist tariffs and is blatantly skewed towards the DNC, but protectionist tarrifs arent what trump's doing, his tariffs are targeted and not universal, targeted tariffs dont raise prices because the US and China are not the only ones in the market there are others. This video also runs on the myth that the consumer pays the price of the tarrif which is ridiculous because the tarrifed nation has to lower prices to remain competitive or else they lose profits due to a loss in market share. Generally profits from the initial sale are not as important of profits from volume. Regardless the president elect has even said if the market doesn't sort out the tarrifs they adjust them.

  • @sydguitar99
    @sydguitar99 Месяц назад +21

    Aren't tariffs a form of big government overreach? I thought the right was against govt intervention in economics

    • @mikeoxlong3676
      @mikeoxlong3676 Месяц назад +2

      That's true but Trump is a 90's Democrat. He's not right wing.

    • @danielch6662
      @danielch6662 Месяц назад +1

      tariffs are just taxes by another name.

    • @0008loser
      @0008loser Месяц назад +8

      It's only government overreach if it's something they don't want

    • @WillyJWill
      @WillyJWill Месяц назад

      @@mikeoxlong3676no way. Trump loves defrocks spending.

    • @WillyJWill
      @WillyJWill Месяц назад

      Deficit

  • @BayleySaxon
    @BayleySaxon Месяц назад +31

    With Donald trump we will ALWAYS go backwards…. He’s never going to put this country in a place it needs to be.
    He can’t run a business and he sure as hell can’t run a country

    • @mako88sb
      @mako88sb Месяц назад +10

      He knows how to grift suckers though. I guess that's all it takes nowadays.

    • @2007NissanAltima
      @2007NissanAltima Месяц назад

      Pt barnum said there’s a sucker born every minute

    • @Galow311
      @Galow311 Месяц назад +4

      Don't want to hear it from the people who propped up a walking corpse

    • @douglasmcfarland9040
      @douglasmcfarland9040 Месяц назад

      ​@Galow311 who invested in infrastructure, housing, chips manufacturing, green energy, and attempted to reign in excessive education debt.

    • @-._.-What-Is-Up-._.-
      @-._.-What-Is-Up-._.- Месяц назад +1

      lol, and We Won Popular Vote, FYI

  • @EPluribusUnumYT
    @EPluribusUnumYT Месяц назад +11

    As a person who also made a tariff video (really podcast) that isn't as nice to tariffs, I think one major issue is the fact of the analysis.
    As you state in the video, very few people benefit from Free Trade. Its a common misnomer that Trump uses that countries like Mexico are raking in the benefits while Americans get screwed, when that is FAR from the truth. Not only has Mexico not seen real wage increase until AMLO directly implemented policies raising wages, but resources from Mexico would then be taken by American Companies and sent to the US, a bizarro version of "The Large Sucking Sound" that Ross Perot would talk about with NAFTAs implementation. With American Companies being able to overcome a legal loophole in the Mexican Constitution that prohibits the taking of indigenous land.
    Will Tariffs fix the problem, not necessarily because simply ADDING tariffs to the economic system we have now still has greedy companies looking to exploit people, as is happening now with companies preparing. While you could enact policies that could negate the negative effects on tariffs, that can't really happen under capitalism as a whole.
    Trumps specific tariff plans are dumb because of the amount, how he plans to implement them. and the fact he's a billionaire fraud only looking for a way to make the rich pay less. And it has been especially hilarious to see Trump Supporters thinking that implementing Tariffs on Mexico is some sort of threat to them because they are too America-Pilled to look at the objective realities of the situation. Under our current free trade deals; Mexico gives us 60% of our Fruit Supply & 1.8 billion barrels of oil, the US gives them Lays Potato Chips and 70% of the weapons used by the cartels....oh no what will Mexico do if the US and them have to stop trading....especially since Sheinbaum is already implementing policies to make Mexico more self sufficient in food agriculture and other things. If the US gets hurt in a Trade War our Billionaire in chief is going to make sure Elon isn't hurt, meanwhile if Mexico gets hurt Sheinbaum's going to help the people.

    • @jagolago-bob
      @jagolago-bob Месяц назад

      Actually, I thought Mr. Beat said that free trade does more or less help everybody.
      I agree with everything else, pretty much.

    • @EPluribusUnumYT
      @EPluribusUnumYT Месяц назад

      @jagolago-bob Well he brought up how real wages have not gone up, but does the more broad take of "Things are cheap". Which means little if wages don't account for that.
      I mean if he did say that, it'd be wrong; Free Trade is a handout for the Rich Elite.

    • @jagolago-bob
      @jagolago-bob Месяц назад

      @@EPluribusUnumYT I think he meant that despite our wages not increasing, with low tariffs we have still been able to buy cheaper imported products (which has hidden our real situation)- the rich have got richer.
      The rich elite have always looked to get richer, at everybody else's expense, free trade or not.

    • @EPluribusUnumYT
      @EPluribusUnumYT Месяц назад

      @@jagolago-bob Its po-tay-toes/po-tah-toes IK, but without wage increases any "benefits" of free trade are borderline nonexistent.

  • @Nikimouse311
    @Nikimouse311 Месяц назад +1

    Omg thank you! My bf’s dad was in town last week and he brought up the tariffs. I never talk politics with him because we have different views - like what’s the point? However, this one was an easily talked about objective truth. He thought the 3rd party companies pay, not the company importing the good. It started to get heated, so I busted out an Investopedia article about “what is a tariff”😂. He basically ended it with, “well Trump will help us out. They will figure it out”. Okay my guy 🙄🤷🏻‍♀️. I have never had so much faith in a politician. Even if the person I voted for wins, I’m still like, “yea, I’ll probably be pissed off at them 6 month in”😂

  • @RoshDroz
    @RoshDroz Месяц назад

    I like this change in direction, Mr. Beast. I think all the controversy will blow over any day now. I support you

  • @VannrithSourisVa
    @VannrithSourisVa Месяц назад +5

    When I say the average consumers will pay more, everyone laugh at me hahaa

    • @HoustonLuksa-m8k
      @HoustonLuksa-m8k 20 дней назад

      They won't, because American made products won't price hike to the beat if the tariffs like you liberals say, if you keep prices low you increase market share and get more profits by volume.

  • @alexalmond6862
    @alexalmond6862 Месяц назад +2

    The people who need to see this will not be seeing this unfortunately

  • @drkrn
    @drkrn Месяц назад +4

    I for one welcome higher prices. I'm tired of going to the store and only spending $250 for my groceries. I want to spend at least $500 doggammit.

    • @cyrollan
      @cyrollan Месяц назад

      Soon!

    • @vetinaris1297
      @vetinaris1297 25 дней назад

      Do you know who invented the word groceries, it may surprise you?

  • @itx_x
    @itx_x Месяц назад

    Day 0 of asking for that Tariff video! Thank you so much for this video. It always amazes me that people don’t know this stuff but sometimes you just got to explain obvious stuff.

  • @Btsjojoandkanye
    @Btsjojoandkanye Месяц назад +2

    Hello mr beat I enjoyed this video thank you for making me smile today :)
    Edit: also i am from scotland and have seen the adam smith statue too

  • @gast321
    @gast321 Месяц назад +3

    I kinda wish this had come out before rhe US election