If there were 2 more T95 variants that would be nice, they'd be the T95E3 with the T54E2's turret and 105mm gun, as well as the T95E8 test rig with M60A2 turret and hydropneumatic suspension.
The US is missing a ton of variants from the Cold War sadly, also Vietnam, it’s pretty criminal we don’t have the m48a5 yet as well as a bunch of AA’s like the chapparal and many others
Well, with the SU-57 and Su-57, those are much easier to distinguish in writing since the "SU" prefix is for Russian self-propelled guns. The "Su" is for aircraft by Sukhoi. It just has to be stylized properly. Far as the US naming scheme goes for the Doom Turtle, it has to be reworked if the base T95 medium tank variant is to be added.
Give us the base T95 medium. Stab and an actual rangefinder would be nice. Also, buff the reload rate. Like Gaijin... it's a 90 mil using single piece ammo; all it does is sling medium caliber darts (which you guys kek'd btw) and not APHE or HEAT
I wish gaijibbles would take a trip to the tank museum at fort benning in Georgia and do some 3D scanning.. they have sooooooo many variants and rare prototypes there. Amazing museum especially for USA stuff.
They should change this t95 to the version with stabiliser and composite armor, right now its not really that competitve, you can do well in it but you would be better off with the m60aos
T95E1 is definitely one of the best-looking tanks in its ranks. Playing it is a bit frustrating. The APFSDS shell has a really narrow cone of damage after penetration, due to Gaijin's limiting small caliber APFSDS round damage. The gun has a slow reload rate, and a bit sub-par accuracy. This, plus not having a gun stabilizer, require the player to have extreme patience and a steady hand to aim at the weakness to secure a score, not just scratch the enemy and got killed in return. The armor, while looking good against APHE shell on paper, does not stand a chance against the modern HEAT or APFSDS at its rank. The mobility is also not the greatest feature, on par with T-55 and M60A1 at best. In comparison, I think T-55 and M60A1 are a lot more enjoyable at this rank. They all have similar, if not slightly better armor protection and mobility. T-55 series almost have every possible good shell type in the game. M60A1 has a fast reload, great accuracy, good penetration, and decent post-penetration damage in its rank. Both T-55 and M60A1 are a lot less frustrating to play. I really hope Gaijin can give some love to the T95E1. At its current status, with not-so-effective firepower and limited mobility and protection, it should be moved down to around 7.0 - 7.3, at most 7.7. The current BR 8.0 is really rough.
I think it would be hilarious is gaijin just turned collision on all the barrels without telling us ahead of time. The amount of people spearing buildings would be great
Coming back to see this video of him saying it should go down to 7.7 from 8.0, only to be at 8.3 now But I use this tank at 9.0 as a support tank, its pretty low to the ground, has decent pen and ok speed, I like to make crit hits then run and helping repair from a defensive position
The US tree has a lot to offer 7.7-8.0; nothing outstanding, but usable. I picked the M60 (+the light tanks) line to research so wont be able to play this tank in a few years. BR vise I say that the T54E1 is over BR-ed as well, since it has nothing over the 7.7 tanks: Slow turret, average mobility, poor armor, no TVD or even NVD. Yes the T279 is better ammo than the M728 (of the M68 gun) but not better than the NATO DM13/L28A1 and u can get those on a lower BR, the autoloader can save u sometimes, but again the similar French tanks has a lower BR.
Object 906 has an even faster reload, far better mobility, a stabilizer, scouting, and an arguably better gun (APHE trumps APDS in a lot of situations, and it still has HEAT-FS in emergencies) at a lower BR. It's crazy. Not to mention TURM III being the same BR, despite just being a better T54E1 in most ways.
It is really a shame that because of costing reasons the United States did not adopt composite armor in its tanks before the m1 Abrams. The Soviets were definitely ahead of the game regarding composites, although the eventual armor deployed on the Abrams was pretty stellar.
when i last played the t95e1 is HATED IT i don't know if it was a feature or a bug but whenever i tried to reverse it would feel like the engine would just stall
crazy expensive like mine is 9k, bradley is also at 8.0 with atgm stabilized 20 mil, thermal with 5k repair, m-60a1 rangefinger stabilized is 6.5k, xm-803 is 5k i have no fkin clue why tankenstein think this tanks is great
I absolutely despise that tank. Accuracy on par with a blunderbuss, hits as hard as a Red Ryder BB gun, protection on par with a wet cardboard box, with the mobility of a golf cart.
@@Starrk_1 the m60a1 is superior with rangefinder and stabilization, the repair cost of the t95 is double the m60a1, i have been where you are just 3 months ago, trust me don’t force yourself to like that thing, it will dry your SL, get the american 8.0 is quite enjoyable with the missile bradley and sheridan, also m60s save yourself from the heartbreak of trying to love that thing..
@Gerald Revell I already got the XM1 803 and I don't play the t95 no more. I didn't go with the m60 because there's no more of them in the top tier and I don't want to research all the previous teir, my main line was the heavies
The problem is that American 8.0's is so mid, and in any other tech tree would be 7.7 at best but because of gaijins hatred of American mid tier and cas holding up the win rates. They are all sitting at shitty BR's
@@BARelement like the italian stabilized Premium M60? Or the Waffenträger version we have in game? The Tiger II Sla16? The different components of the T110E5 did exist but the tank wasnt built. Just the same as the tanks above.
@@schullerandreas556 M-60s existed, tiger II Hs existed, the engine was actually tested in a jagdtiger hull im sure. What did the T110E5 get other than words on the paper?
The fact that the t95e1, t54e1 and the German TURM 3 are the same BR is such a joke. The first two should not be over 7.7 and honestly the t95 should be 7.3 as it’s more comparable to the leopard 1
This tank is pure ass at 8.0, it has no features whatsoever, everything onn it is against it at its br, the only reason to play this is to get the extra 10% of RP towards the next in live vehicle
Bruh💀....how on earth would you suggest that this tank with its apfsds and armour face tigers, jagdpanthers, is2s, ferdinands, t44, jagdtiger, panthers. In short you're encouraging worsening of the br system
@@maxwellmaragia2272 every 7.7 tank can already do that, take the t54 as an example. The t54 is even more immune to ww2 tanks because it does not have any good frontal weak points. If anything you should be complaining about the leo 1 and t54 early more because at 7.3 those things don't care about your armor.
I really would want to see the T95 with siliceous armour, basically the first western composite armour which almost no one knows about
Gaijin: Da, Da comrade, we give this 20mm protection, da it’s correct
If there were 2 more T95 variants that would be nice, they'd be the T95E3 with the T54E2's turret and 105mm gun, as well as the T95E8 test rig with M60A2 turret and hydropneumatic suspension.
They need to give us the t95 with stabilizer and composite. It looks a lot closer.
The US is missing a ton of variants from the Cold War sadly, also Vietnam, it’s pretty criminal we don’t have the m48a5 yet as well as a bunch of AA’s like the chapparal and many others
Adding some of those things would definitely make this br range much better for the US
Gajin: adds range finder, raises BR to 7.0, doesn’t elaborate, leaves
T95e1 and T95(T28) are perhaps the two most different vehicles with the same name (Except maybe the Su57 TD and Su57 plane). We need more doom tutel.
Well, with the SU-57 and Su-57, those are much easier to distinguish in writing since the "SU" prefix is for Russian self-propelled guns. The "Su" is for aircraft by Sukhoi. It just has to be stylized properly.
Far as the US naming scheme goes for the Doom Turtle, it has to be reworked if the base T95 medium tank variant is to be added.
Give us the base T95 medium. Stab and an actual rangefinder would be nice. Also, buff the reload rate. Like Gaijin... it's a 90 mil using single piece ammo; all it does is sling medium caliber darts (which you guys kek'd btw) and not APHE or HEAT
I wish gaijibbles would take a trip to the tank museum at fort benning in Georgia and do some 3D scanning.. they have sooooooo many variants and rare prototypes there. Amazing museum especially for USA stuff.
They should change this t95 to the version with stabiliser and composite armor, right now its not really that competitve, you can do well in it but you would be better off with the m60aos
And same br with t72-64 with shit apfds other nations dont use even 8.0 ....
@@sinanates-nz9ne the stabilized composite t95 would never go above br 8.3 and I think it would be pretty decent.
I hope we can get the version with the composite armor and stabilizer.
T95E1 is definitely one of the best-looking tanks in its ranks. Playing it is a bit frustrating. The APFSDS shell has a really narrow cone of damage after penetration, due to Gaijin's limiting small caliber APFSDS round damage. The gun has a slow reload rate, and a bit sub-par accuracy. This, plus not having a gun stabilizer, require the player to have extreme patience and a steady hand to aim at the weakness to secure a score, not just scratch the enemy and got killed in return.
The armor, while looking good against APHE shell on paper, does not stand a chance against the modern HEAT or APFSDS at its rank. The mobility is also not the greatest feature, on par with T-55 and M60A1 at best.
In comparison, I think T-55 and M60A1 are a lot more enjoyable at this rank. They all have similar, if not slightly better armor protection and mobility. T-55 series almost have every possible good shell type in the game. M60A1 has a fast reload, great accuracy, good penetration, and decent post-penetration damage in its rank. Both T-55 and M60A1 are a lot less frustrating to play.
I really hope Gaijin can give some love to the T95E1. At its current status, with not-so-effective firepower and limited mobility and protection, it should be moved down to around 7.0 - 7.3, at most 7.7. The current BR 8.0 is really rough.
Or they could just implement the other versions which would be massive improvements.
I think it would be hilarious is gaijin just turned collision on all the barrels without telling us ahead of time. The amount of people spearing buildings would be great
Coming back to see this video of him saying it should go down to 7.7 from 8.0, only to be at 8.3 now
But I use this tank at 9.0 as a support tank, its pretty low to the ground, has decent pen and ok speed, I like to make crit hits then run and helping repair from a defensive position
The US tree has a lot to offer 7.7-8.0; nothing outstanding, but usable. I picked the M60 (+the light tanks) line to research so wont be able to play this tank in a few years.
BR vise I say that the T54E1 is over BR-ed as well, since it has nothing over the 7.7 tanks: Slow turret, average mobility, poor armor, no TVD or even NVD. Yes the T279 is better ammo than the M728 (of the M68 gun) but not better than the NATO DM13/L28A1 and u can get those on a lower BR, the autoloader can save u sometimes, but again the similar French tanks has a lower BR.
Object 906 has an even faster reload, far better mobility, a stabilizer, scouting, and an arguably better gun (APHE trumps APDS in a lot of situations, and it still has HEAT-FS in emergencies) at a lower BR. It's crazy. Not to mention TURM III being the same BR, despite just being a better T54E1 in most ways.
It is really a shame that because of costing reasons the United States did not adopt composite armor in its tanks before the m1 Abrams. The Soviets were definitely ahead of the game regarding composites, although the eventual armor deployed on the Abrams was pretty stellar.
when i last played the t95e1 is HATED IT i don't know if it was a feature or a bug but whenever i tried to reverse it would feel like the engine would just stall
My only problem with this tank is the reload, it doesn't make any sense that large turret and 90mm caliber is reload slower than 105mm
Maybe we could get more T95s if the BRs were much, much more decompressed. Grinding this tank to ace was pure pain.
Hey tankenstein would you like to see the USA t69 or the t58 auto loaded tanks in game
Only if he knew it would become 8.3..... lol
well thats a decent aged vid, i can see repair factory still going
Only thing I hate about htis thing, is the transmission. You cannot turn on the spot, its like a wheeled vehicle.
Do u know when the next vehicle sale is?
As an american main, I approve of this message
What are the repair costs and repair times ?
crazy expensive like mine is 9k, bradley is also at 8.0 with atgm stabilized 20 mil, thermal with 5k repair, m-60a1 rangefinger stabilized is 6.5k, xm-803 is 5k i have no fkin clue why tankenstein think this tanks is great
@@amorphousdc this tank has been left in the dust cuz gaijin forgot about it. The other variants could be really good but gaijin likes US suffering.
Looks like the tank do well at 8.0
It doesn’t
I absolutely despise that tank. Accuracy on par with a blunderbuss, hits as hard as a Red Ryder BB gun, protection on par with a wet cardboard box, with the mobility of a golf cart.
Really? I get everything but the armor, that has saved me plenty of times from apds.
RUclips really knows I play war thunder, it just gave me a tender add😭 like bro you know I can’t talk to women, I play this game
It should be 7.7
Same as M103.
I'm almost done with the research for this tank. I searched on RUclips and I saw this video uploaded 10 hours ago
its not worth it buddy, the tank after is fkin awesome though
@Gerald Revell idk but it's my first tank with that advanced shells
@@Starrk_1 the m60a1 is superior with rangefinder and stabilization, the repair cost of the t95 is double the m60a1, i have been where you are just 3 months ago, trust me don’t force yourself to like that thing, it will dry your SL, get the american 8.0 is quite enjoyable with the missile bradley and sheridan, also m60s save yourself from the heartbreak of trying to love that thing..
@Gerald Revell I already got the XM1 803 and I don't play the t95 no more. I didn't go with the m60 because there's no more of them in the top tier and I don't want to research all the previous teir, my main line was the heavies
I enjoyed playing the E95e1 because of the APFSDS shells
I think the t95 is the least interesting and competetive in the entire 8.0 lineup rn lol
The problem is that American 8.0's is so mid, and in any other tech tree would be 7.7 at best but because of gaijins hatred of American mid tier and cas holding up the win rates. They are all sitting at shitty BR's
Its kinda sad that of all the t95 variants we probably got the most vanilla of the bunch
This isn't even the vanilla one, this is the budget one lol.
this thing's Gun handling tho
All I want is the T110E5 at the same BR as the M103
Didn’t exist
@@BARelement like the italian stabilized Premium M60? Or the Waffenträger version we have in game? The Tiger II Sla16?
The different components of the T110E5 did exist but the tank wasnt built. Just the same as the tanks above.
@@schullerandreas556 M-60s existed, tiger II Hs existed, the engine was actually tested in a jagdtiger hull im sure. What did the T110E5 get other than words on the paper?
@@schullerandreas556 An engine tht was tested, and existed is different from an entire tank that never existed that only resides in WOT.
@@BARelement a gun that was tested. A derivation of the gun used in the T34 and firther develiped into the M58.
The fact that the t95e1, t54e1 and the German TURM 3 are the same BR is such a joke. The first two should not be over 7.7 and honestly the t95 should be 7.3 as it’s more comparable to the leopard 1
War thunder so realistic for vehicles unless they are American
I really hate T-95. Thank God I got Abrams after suffer
We should get a new a 10
The uranium one
No.
We need to stop adding things to top-tier.
@@IJN_Guy simple, stop playing then 💯
@@LewisB3217 What?
@@IJN_Guy stop playing if you want things to stop being added to top tier, gaijin will never do that
This tank was ass to play at 8.0. Has a decent round but slow, immobile and no stabs.
it is way faster than m60a1 tho, i agree this tank is ass nonetheless
@@amorphousdc it’s not, it has worse hp/t
@@Optimusprime56241 i am currently playing 8.0 with this as back-up, it really is faster bud
@@amorphousdc nigga it takes 0 dollars to look up the War Thunder wiki and see that you’re wrong
This tank is pure ass at 8.0, it has no features whatsoever, everything onn it is against it at its br, the only reason to play this is to get the extra 10% of RP towards the next in live vehicle
Bruh💀....how on earth would you suggest that this tank with its apfsds and armour face tigers, jagdpanthers, is2s, ferdinands, t44, jagdtiger, panthers. In short you're encouraging worsening of the br system
No, this thing is Hella overtiered. You should play it and see for yourself.
@@gavinlightfoot5521 So it should face ww2 tanks? whom can't pen it but it can lol pen them anywhere? Use some common sense
@@maxwellmaragia2272 every 7.7 tank can already do that, take the t54 as an example. The t54 is even more immune to ww2 tanks because it does not have any good frontal weak points. If anything you should be complaining about the leo 1 and t54 early more because at 7.3 those things don't care about your armor.
@@maxwellmaragia2272 plus the apfsds from the t95e1 is not very good, most apds is much better so it wouldn't be changing much by getting moved down.