I love this channel because it just shows the games with no commentary or analysis to interrupt the game. I try to guess the next move and occasionally I get it right , and I feel as if I thought, at least for a moment, along the lines of a grandmaster.
That game against Bortnyk was nuts. At 43:00 instead of ....Nxg1, ....Rxe5 was needed to prevent Bortnyk from playing Nxg6 like he did in the game. Magnus would have been up an exchange after that because both Rooks would be hanging. You can see the evaluation bar drop immediately after Nxg1 was played.
@@lifesnotfair ...Bxh4 is the best move in that position instead of ...Kh8. Depending on white's reply. if you increase the depth it is not as bad for white as -3.3. Complicated position.
@@supplyequalsdemand2739 it would be easy for him to cover up any engine assistance, and incentives would be to improve his play and to win convincingly to build a persona that comes off as impossible to beat I think first guy that beat him after many years of not losing won in a ridiculous way and he was not pleased At least 2 instances where an absolutely incredible game was played against him and he showed no respect I’m not saying he cheated during those 2 games, most likely in my opinion he would have the highest likelihood to cheat in lichess arenas for the reasons I gave No body seems to notice that Carlsen has a hard time winning convincingly, but in many of those lichess arenas he won almost every game convincingly But the problem is not that i “think he’s cheating” I don’t know if he is I would just like to know how cheating can be prevented from occurring in exactly the way Carlsen could theoretically use it to his ultimate overall advantage It wouldn’t be at all difficult to have an overlaying arrows program on the computer that shows all good moves and he could just pick the one thats the coolest looking Time scrambles are a different story, I haven’t given much thought but I don’t think it’s as important as first just winning the game A time scramble would be much easier to win with the quality of the game that had been played, he wouldn’t give a crap about winning or losing at that point and would be totally relaxed MVL beat him in speed chess and he really tried to win
I love this channel because it just shows the games with no commentary or analysis to interrupt the game. I try to guess the next move and occasionally I get it right , and I feel as if I thought, at least for a moment, along the lines of a grandmaster.
you too old to be playing that androgynous game
This is how I like it , no BS commentary. Just pure, high quality chess.
🔫
Well also Magnus Carlsen blunders a chess skewer in time trouble. This is so comforting....
Yeh 1/200 games , you 50/50
Thats weak talk
That game against Bortnyk was nuts. At 43:00 instead of ....Nxg1, ....Rxe5 was needed to prevent Bortnyk from playing Nxg6 like he did in the game. Magnus would have been up an exchange after that because both Rooks would be hanging. You can see the evaluation bar drop immediately after Nxg1 was played.
Still trying to figure out why he was winning (-3.3) at 42:16 ... what was the winning move!?!?
@@lifesnotfair ...Bxh4 is the best move in that position instead of ...Kh8. Depending on white's reply. if you increase the depth it is not as bad for white as -3.3. Complicated position.
Thank you!
Beats a master. 0 rating point gain
If i was Magnus after this I would farm Nihal and Olek
I need magnus vedio to know thought process
!score
Magnus says he likes free pawns but he never goes for them...just positions his pieces.
Салам. Алейкум всем любителям шахмат
round 2: brm72 looks like a cheater
Sarin put a move on Magnus!
Very nice
classical zugzwang
I was hoping nihal would wins
3rd place below Nihal sarin😊
I think if Magnus ever cheats there’s no way to tell and some of his online performances are extremely fishy
Are you madd?he is the best player,just shut up 20iq kiddo and get lost
He plays just as good otb as well so his online performance isn't an anomaly
There isn’t anyone on the planet he cannot beat and it’s been that way for a decade. What incentive does he have to cheat? Stupid comment.
@@supplyequalsdemand2739 it would be easy for him to cover up any engine assistance, and incentives would be to improve his play and to win convincingly to build a persona that comes off as impossible to beat
I think first guy that beat him after many years of not losing won in a ridiculous way and he was not pleased
At least 2 instances where an absolutely incredible game was played against him and he showed no respect
I’m not saying he cheated during those 2 games, most likely in my opinion he would have the highest likelihood to cheat in lichess arenas for the reasons I gave
No body seems to notice that Carlsen has a hard time winning convincingly, but in many of those lichess arenas he won almost every game convincingly
But the problem is not that i “think he’s cheating”
I don’t know if he is
I would just like to know how cheating can be prevented from occurring in exactly the way Carlsen could theoretically use it to his ultimate overall advantage
It wouldn’t be at all difficult to have an overlaying arrows program on the computer that shows all good moves and he could just pick the one thats the coolest looking
Time scrambles are a different story, I haven’t given much thought but I don’t think it’s as important as first just winning the game
A time scramble would be much easier to win with the quality of the game that had been played, he wouldn’t give a crap about winning or losing at that point and would be totally relaxed
MVL beat him in speed chess and he really tried to win
My reply was deleted