Can you also elaborate on the Book of Mormon? If the message are in line with the other Abrahamic Scriptures, why should we not accept it as another Divine Scripture since God can bring another revelation like He did with the previous scriptures and the Qur'an? Just a curious, perhaps valid, question.
Good lecture, ma sha' Allah, but the adjective to use is surely not "Jamesonian". It could be Jamesian, or Jacobite, but "Jamesonian" would mean "of Jameson", not "of James". I think you're being influenced by words such as "Jeffersonian" or "Jacksonian" here, but in those situations the nouns have "son" in them.
Your work has truly helped bridge my understanding as a former christian to revert muslim, thank you so much Dr. Ataie
أعظّم الله نفعك، و أجرك، و أثابك بالثبات على الحق المُنزّل حتى ياتيك اليقين. اللهم آمين
14 minutes of unmatched intelligence
Intriguing, concise, useful, value-add. Thank you Zaytuna!
Thank you for this. Just in time too. Allah is truly all hearing.
preach brother preach ❤️❤️
Many thanks dear Professor
ماشاءالله تبارك الله
بارك الله فيك وجزاك الله خير
May Allah bless you my role model❤❤❤❤
Robert Eisenman and his work on the Dead Sea scroll got a shoutout
Can you also elaborate on the Book of Mormon? If the message are in line with the other Abrahamic Scriptures, why should we not accept it as another Divine Scripture since God can bring another revelation like He did with the previous scriptures and the Qur'an? Just a curious, perhaps valid, question.
Good lecture, ma sha' Allah, but the adjective to use is surely not "Jamesonian". It could be Jamesian, or Jacobite, but "Jamesonian" would mean "of Jameson", not "of James". I think you're being influenced by words such as "Jeffersonian" or "Jacksonian" here, but in those situations the nouns have "son" in them.